union of churches an alternative organizational model for the seventh-day adventist church
TRANSCRIPT
UNION OF CHURCHES
An alternative organizational model for the Seventh-day Adventist Church
introduction Policy discourages the organization of a
union of churches Sub-committee assigned to study whether
policy should be changed to encourage a union of churches
Sub- committee decided to include a union of churches-mission to complete the picture
introduction Nomenclature-
Union of Churches-conferenceUnion of Churches-mission
Definition of a Union of Churches: A united organized body of local churches
within a territory, having similar status to a union conference or union mission, and a direct relationship with the division.
introduction
Irregular and diverse circumstances around the world:
Geographical hurdles, language issues, financial challenges, ethnic concerns, cultural norms, geopolitical hurdles, traditions.
introduction
No one model fits all these situations
Flexibility is needed
history 1967-first union of churches-Austria
1981-General Conference approved recommendation of Euro-Africa Division to set up unions of churches
1983-policy approved
1985 General Conference Session approved representation
history Reasons given-
small membership
difficult evangelistic environment
Interim structure to be used until the church grew into a more viable stature, requiring mission or conference status
history
1981-Italy, Spain and Portugal became unions of churches
General Conference action, “The tithe percentage will be paid as though they were unions,” but the organization would be an exception rather than a model for new church structures.
history General Conference Annual Council action,
1983, approved new policy stating, “The Church does not encourage the organizational arrangements termed union of churches.”
Only an action of the General Conference Committee can authorize the establishment of a union of churches.
history
1984-1995 Sri Lanka was listed as a union of churches
current status Unions of churches in Euro-Africa and Trans-
European Divisions
5 countries in EUD and 1 in TED
Netherlands and Sweden have adopted union of churches structure but have union conference status
current status SIX UNIONS OF CHURCHES
RANGE: Population-5.525 million to 59.178 million Membership-2649 to 11,742 (Average 6961 per
union) Churches-47 to 114 (Average 81 per union) Institutions-3 to 6 (Average 4.8 per union) Ordained ministers- 17 to 63 (Average 38 per union)
current statusSTATISTICS:
An average of .46 ordained pastors per church An average of 84 members per church Church membership is approximately .003%
of population
rationale for changeJan Paulsen stated: Globality of Church Rapid growth in some areas Sluggish growth in some areas (which historically
have been resource providers) Changed expectations from members Government regulations Predominance of non Christian religionsForce the church to re-examine organizational structure
rationale for change BIG CONCERNS:
1. Global unity
2. Global mission
3. Best use of resources
rationale for change ISSUES WHICH AFFECT UNITY:Organization, structure, communication,
policies, theology, identity, values, beliefs, committees, prophetic gift, Church Manual
ISSUES WHICH AFFECT MISSION:Preaching, teaching, healing, responding to
poverty and disasters
rationale for change
ISSUES WHICH AFFECT RESOURCES:Examine what and how we are doing things now
as opposed to what we did when the Church was established;
Are we meeting the needs of the global community and the global Church?
rationale for changeWHY UNION OF CHURCHES?1. Reduce number of levels of organization2. Enable redistribution of financial resources3. Enable redistribution of personnel4. Enhance mission in specific areas5. Facilitate access to country authorities6. Faster communication and more appropriate
decision making
changes needed
Making a union of churches a desirable option:
Change policy-a positive option Adequate representation at all levels Fair financial arrangements Remove special wage scale provisions Define clear criteria and process for new status
changes needed
Policy for union of churches-conference, similar to union conference, with a blend of local conference elements
Policy for union of churches-mission, similar to union mission, with a blend of local mission elements
changes needed
Union of churches-conference, self-supporting, approve its own constitution based on new model
Union of churches-mission, guided by operating policy, approved by division, based on General Conference model policy
changes neededNEW NOMENCLATURE:
Union Conference of ChurchesUnion Mission of Churches
ORUnion of Churches-ConferenceUnion of Churches-Mission
ORAnother
changes needed
New policy to govern distribution of institutions
New policy to govern discontinuation, dissolution, and mergers
philosophy Changing and diverse world Dominant religious organizations Faster and effective means of communication Possibility of centralized financial
management to large geographical areas Tighter immigration laws Difficulty transferring funds
philosophy Expansion of education Rapid growth of Church in some areas Negative growth of Church in some areas Increased threat of war Ability to travel long distances quickly and
cheaplySome factors are a blessing; others are
challenge to the Church
philosophyWE NEED TO ASK QUESTIONS:
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the new model?
Does it respond to the realities of the Church and the world we now live in?
Can we or should we amend a structure that is almost 160 years old?
philosophy
Is the Church over-governed? The answer could be-yes, in some parts, no, in others
Will new structures threaten unity or enhance it?
Does the new model fairly provide for representation?
philosophy
Local churches struggling financially Perception is that too much money is being
passed to higher organizations Not enough money for evangelism locally Should we alter structure just to redistribute
money? We need a better reason than just financial
philosophy
Restructuring must foster unity We must avoid congregationalism at all costs Be careful to avoid isolation Restructuring must release more personnel into the
field Country structures can respond to political realities
far more readily New structures must not result in additional units
philosophy
We must bring the Church into 21st century Change can be painful If it is imposed it becomes objectionable-must be
seen as an option Must include features that address relevant needs Must assist the mission of the Church, provide
essential resources, both financial and personnel
constitution
Changes will be needed in the General Conference constitution and bylaws to accommodate new models
Union of churches-conference and union of churches-mission need to be identified as well recognized units, not Cinderella organizations
constitution ARTICLE IV-MEMBERSHIPMembership of the General Conference includes unions
of churches-conference and union of churches-mission
ARTICLE V-General Conference SESSIONSRegular delegates to GC Session from unions of
churchesUnion of churches-mission: one delegate as well as
president (same as union mission)Union of churches-conference: two delegates as well as
president (same as union conference)
constitution
ARTICLE VIII-EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Presidents of union of churches-conference and mission serve as ex-officio members of General Conference Executive Committee
bylaws ARTICLE VIII-AUDITING SERVICE AND
AUDITS
GCAS is the preferred provider for auditing services for unions of churches
ARTICLE XIII-EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
This article will need to be deleted. It states that presidents of unions of churches are only invitees to General Conference Executive Committee
bylaws ARTICLE XIV-DIVISION EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEES
Presidents of unions of churches to be ex-officio of their respective division committees
ARTICLE XVII-FUNDS
An extra percentage of funds (2-3%) may need to be remitted to the division for extra services rendered to unions of churches, e.g. depts.
bylaws
Unions of churches will have access to a larger pool of funds than union conferences/missions. Unions of churches will receive 100% of the tithe from the local churches while union conferences/missions usually only receive 10% of this amount. If unions of churches are required to remit an extra 2-3% to the division they will still receive 70-80% more than union conferences/missions.
policy amendmentsB Organization and Administration Constituency based units No longer an exceptional unit of organization Units required to abide by teachings and
policies of the Church A building block of the church Remove the special wage scale provision
policy
B 60 ESTABLISHING NEW CONSTITUENCY-BASED UNITS
Nomenclature Process for organizing new unions of churches Reorganizing unions of churches-better to organize
two unions of churches rather than a union conference or union mission-which puts back another level of structure
policy
B 75 11 ESTABLISHING NEW CONSTITUENCY-BASED UNITS
General criteria for establishing new unions of churches
Process for dividing a union of churches
policyB 85 UNION OF CHURCHES Negativity removed Preferred organizational arrangement New set of criteria
-contiguous boundaries-no more than one union in any geographical area-similar language groups-population, 10 mill.-150 mill.-membership, 4000-150,000-no sub units-must advance mission of the Church
policy
B 85 UNION OF CHURCHES
Authorization by General Conference Union of churches-conference, model
constitution Union of churches-mission, operating policy
policyB 90 DISCONTINUATION OF
ORGANIZATIONS
Discontinuation of organizations Mergers Dissolution Expulsion
policyD 11 MODEL UNION OF CHURCHES-
CONFERENCE CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS
Patterned after union conference and conference constitution and bylaws
policyD 17 MODEL UNION OF CHURCHES-MISSION
OPERATING POLICY
An entirely new policy The model needs to be added to the GC Working
Policy Needs to be approved by the relevant division
executive committee for each union of churches-mission
Includes elements from local mission and union mission model operating policies
policyFinancial policies
Policies have yet to be written It is recommended that unions of churches remit to the
division an extra 2-3% more than union conferences/missions This is to cover extra services provided by the division to
unions of churches, e.g. departments Divisions may return this money to unions of churches if
extra services are not needed and /or provided
policy Remember that unions of churches will have
access to a larger pool of funds than union conferences/missions. Unions of churches will receive 100% of the tithe from the local churches while union conferences/missions only receive 10% of this amount. If unions of churches are required to remit an extra 2-3% to the division they will still receive 70-80% more than union conferences/missions.
recommendationsWe recommend: the redistribution of finances and personnel to meet
the needs of an irregular world and a rapidly changing church
that the total number of administrative units be reduced and that one level of structure be eliminated where deemed valuable for mission of the Church
the adoption of unions of churches, both conference and mission to address the issues identified above
recommendationsWe recommend: That unions of churches, conference and
mission be normalized in General Conference Constitution and Bylaws as well as in Working Policy
That a special study be initiated to determine how best to communicate this proposal to church members
recommendationsWe recommend: The development of models to show impact
on number of delegates to GC Session, additional members on GC and Division Executive Committees
The development of models that will demonstrate the impact of this proposal on both financial and personnel resources.
appendices Appendix A General Consultation on Church Polity and Theology in
Europe Appendix BRobert Pierson Letter Appendix CAustrian Union Conference Reorganization Appendix DRobert Pierson Telegram
appendices Appendix ERobert Pierson Letter to Marius Fridlin Appendix FEdwin Ludescher Letter to Neal Wilson and other items Appendix GObservations and responses to questionnaires sent to
union of churches-conference presidents Appendix HAdventist Review, July 14-28, 2005