UNDAP Tanzania 2011-15

An Overview of the UN/GoT Programme of Cooperation

• Improve the coherence, development effectiveness and efficiency of its operations in Tanzania; improve the transparency of the UN’s work in Tanzania and thereby enhancing its accountability to the Government and Development Partners.

• The UN in Tanzania’s experience in developing and using the previous and current UNDAFs to guide the UN’s work. Key constraints included: lack of prioritisation, broadly defined similar outcomes which were overly ambitious for the timeframe, lack of specificity about what the UN would contribute, and lack of monitoring and evaluation.

• The UNCMT’s decision to develop a single UN country plan for Tanzania; moving from a strategic framework (UNDAF) to a single country programme.

• The UN resolution A/RES/64/289 on system wide coherence allowed for submission and approval of common country programmes on a voluntary basis

UNDAP: The Rationale

UNDAP: What is different?UNDAF 2007-11 UNDAP 2011-15

1. A framework for the UN agencies to operate within Tanzania

1. A business plan for the UN agencies in Tanzania

2. Echoes Tanzania’s development priorities to which the UN would contribute

2. Articulates the contribution of the UN system to the national priorities

3. Agencies developed individual plans using UNDAF as the overarching framework (out of these, 9 Joint Programmes developed)

3. UNDAP is the plan for all UN agencies in Tanzania

4. Only Joint Programme reviewed annually (performance based fund allocations)

4. Entire UN Programme reviewed annually (performance based fund allocations)

CCA

Specialised Agency Country Plans

Standard process

UNDAP process

Prioritisation UNDAFSpecialised Agency Country

Plans

CPAPsCPD

Common CPDUNDAPPrioritisationMKUKUTA/ MKUZA Review

UNDAP: Results and Accountability

8 MDGs& IADGs

16 MKUKUTA + 14 MKUZA

58 UNDAP Outcomes

182 UNDAP Outputs

369 UNDAP Key Actions of 19 UN agenciesIndividual agency

Agency(s) and Implementing Partners

UN andImplementing Partners

GoT and Development Partners

Member states

Collective Accountability

UNDAP: Prioritising Capacity DevelopmentCapacity of Who?(Of Outcomes)

Capacity to do What?(Of Outputs)

Legislative & Democratic

5% Judiciary & En-

forcement7%

MDAs42%

LGAs/ Facilities

20%

Communi-ties & Citi-

zens10%

CSOs and

FBOs11%

Private Sector5%

Policy and Legislative

Strategy & Budget Allocation

Implementation capacity, including institutional capacity

M&E and learning

Resource Mobilization

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

31

53

111

47

22

Service Delivery: 5% of UNDAP34% of BudgetService Delivery: school feeding;emergencies/refugee assistance

Capacity Development: 95% of UNDAP66% of Budget

UNDAP: Budgetary FrameworkUNDAP Budget Outlay: $ 773m (inclusive of programme costsClus-

ter One23%

Clus-ter

Two42%

Cluster Three35%

Economic Growth9%

Environment14%

Education13%

Health17%

HIV/AIDS5%

WASH3%

Social Protection4%

Governance9%

Emergencies2%

Refugees24%

Core , $126, 16%

Non Core, $431, 56%

One Fund, $216, 28%

Economic Growth

Environment

Education

Health

HIV/AIDS

WASH

Social Protection

Governance

Emergencies

Refugees

0 50000000 100000000 150000000 200000000

Agency Core Resources Agency Non Core Resources Resources to be mobilised - One Fund

UNDAP: Resource Mobilisation Plan (mill USD)Core ,

$126, 16%

Non Core, $431, 56%

One Fund, $216, 28%

Cluster I: Growth for reduction of income poverty(Budget: $ 180 million, 23%)

Advance fulfillment of Tanzania’s international treaty obligations

Providing Durable

solutions

Basic services

andprotection

for refugees

Strengthening National

emergency preparedness and response

Justice system responsive to

children & women

Cluster II: Improvement of Quality of Life and Social Well-being (Budget: $ 323m, 42%)

Advancing good governance,

national oversight and accountability

Deepening democracy and

further community

dialogue

Health, Nutrition and HIV / AIDS

Strengthening development management

capacity

Water, Sanitation and Hygiene

Protection services, Social Protection

Education, Vocational Training, School feeding

Agriculture productivity & food

security

Trade promotion and Labour standards

Environmental mainstreaming & climate change

adaptation

SME capacity and entrepreneurial skills

Cluster III: Governance and Accountability (Budget: $ 270 m , 35%)

Enabling Environment

Sectoral capacities

National Development Outcomes

Supporting Basic Social

Services

Reducing income poverty

Fulfilment of human rights in Tanzania

UNDAP: Areas of cooperation

UNDAP Management StructureJSC

CMT

OMT

WG on HACT WG on ICT

WG on HR WG on Procurement

WG on Common Premises

WG on Finance

IAPC

IAGG PWG on Economic Growth

Human Rights Group

PWG on Environment

PME Group

PWG on Education

PWG on Emergencies

PWG on HealthPWG on

Social Protection PWG on

HIV/AIDSPWG on WASH

PWG on Governance

PWG on Refugees

Com’G

Cluster I

Cluster II

Cluster III

JSC: Joint Steering CommitteeCMT: Country Management TeamSMT: Security Management TeamOMT: Operations Management TeamIAPC: Inter-Agency Programme CommitteeCom’G: Communications GroupECG: Emergency Coordination GroupIAGG: Inter-Agency Gender GroupHRG: Human Rights GroupPME Group: Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation GroupPWG: Programme Working GroupZnz CG: Zanzibar Coordination Group

Znz CG

Proposed planning, monitoring & reporting

UNDAP

WG Annual Workplans

UN will sign 10 AWPs with GoT

Country Programme Planning

Annual Work Planning

Common Review process Mid Year /Annual Reviews

Agency reporting as necessary

One UN report

Annual report

Economic Growth

Environ-ment Education Health HIV/AIDS

Social Protection WASH Governance Emergencies Refugees

UNDAP: Results and Accountability

8 MDGs& IADGs

16 MKUKUTA + 14 MKUZA

58 UNDAP Outcomes

182 UNDAP Outputs

369 UNDAP Key Actions of 19 UN agenciesIndividual agency

Agency(s) and Implementing Partners

UN andImplementing Partners

GoT and Development Partners

Member states

Collective Accountability

Key National Policy Documents

Problem Identification

Causality Analysis

Duty Bearers Role & Capacity Assessment

Possible Areas of UN Intervention

Outcome Statements

Programme Results Matrix

Programme M&E Matrix

Delivering as One Matrix

UNDAP: the Process

Stakeholder ParticipationGovernment of

Tanzania UN AgenciesCivil SocietyDevelopment

Partners

Cross Cutting Considerations– Human Rights– Gender Equality– Environmental

Sustainability– Capacity Development – RBM

Advocacy (Decision makers, Leveraging)7%

Behaviour Change Com-munication (Public)

2%

Inter-institutional coordina-tion 6%

Stakeholder consultation5%

Analytical work and in-formation sharing

20%

Equipment, Commodities, Material Supplies10%

Formulation of standards, tools, plans, frameworks

and guidelines32%

Technical skills13%

Pilots and Vulnerable subnational areas4%

COMMUNICATION

CONVENER (Strengthening

Inclusive Decision-Making)

FUNCTIONAL CAPACITIES

How will the UN build this capacity?(Of Key Actions)

UNDAP: Prioritising Capacity Development

UNDAP: the ProcessUNDAP is results-based and mainstreams UN programming principles and cross-cutting issues:

• UN priorities were identified using a Human Rights Based Approach to Programming (HRBA)

• Gender equality was mainstreamed in prioritization and programming phases, supported with Quality Assurance mechanisms

• Capacity Development was an important consideration in the formulation of Outcomes and deciding on the choice of interventions

• Specific outcomes relating Environmental Sustainability are planned in UNDAP, and have been mainstreamed as cross-cutting considerations with planned key actions

• Cross-cutting issues on HIV/AIDS, Conflict prevention, Disaster risk reduction (DRR), Food security, Indigenous peoples’ issues, Volunteerism and Employment & decent work have also been considered in light of planned key actions

More than 300 persons participated in the development of UNDAP

GoT44%

NSAs21%

UN35%

NSAs include CSOs, FBOs, INGOs, Private Sector and DPs.