ulsd hydrotreater challenges overcome to improve on stream factor - mepec 2013

19
Striving for Excellence 1 ULSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve On-Stream Factor Alpesh Gurjar The Bahrain Petroleum Company (Bapco) Kingdom of Bahrain 2 October 2013

Upload: alpesh-gurjar

Post on 11-Nov-2014

166 views

Category:

Technology


3 download

DESCRIPTION

The presentation outlines the experience in overcoming the challenges that faced and the lessons learned, to achieve safe, reliable and profitable Diesel Hydrotreater (2HDU) operation, while meeting all throughput and yield targets and product specifications. The 2HDU success over the 6½ years clearly demonstrated the importance and value of in-house process engineering expertise and experience, while working as a part of cross-functional team.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

1

ULSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome

to Improve On-Stream Factor

Alpesh Gurjar

The Bahrain Petroleum Company (Bapco) Kingdom of Bahrain

2 October 2013

Page 2: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

2

Agenda

• Introduction

• Background

• Simplified Process Flow Sketch

• Challenges

• Lessons Learned and Concluding Remarks

Page 3: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

Introduction

• Bapco operates the Bahrain Refinery - capacity 265,000 BPD

• Produces 100,000 BPD of ULSD, of which 70% comes from the ULSD

Hydrotreater (2HDU)

• 2HDU history and operation:

– Commissioned as VGO Hydrotreater (52,000 BPD) in 1972

– Revamped to Mild Hydrocracker in 1983

– Revamped to 70,000 BPD ULSD Hydrotreater in 2007

• Sustained and reliable operation of 2HDU has great influence on refinery performance

Sulfur PNA, wt% Cetane Index T95%, °C

Feed 1.70 wt% 13 50 367

Diesel Product <10 wppm 2 55 min 357

3

Page 4: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

4

Background to 2HDU Revamp

• 2HDU was revamped with minimum capital investment - maximum re-use

of existing equipment, including recycle gas compressor (RGC)

• Two additional reactors and a stabilizer added, product stripper revamped

• Catalyst target life - 2 years with 4 years unit operating cycle

• Unit has been onstream for 6 years without T&I or catalyst changeout

• T&I in 2014 - 6½ year cycle - unprecedented in 40 years of unit’s history

• Outstanding on-stream factor achieved, with a proven safety record

Page 5: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

Rich Amine

LP Amine

Absorber

5

Process Flow Sketch - Reaction Section

Feed Heater Feed Heater

Feed

Feed Filters

550# Steam

Condensate

Surface Condenser

PSA

Lean Amine

HP Absorber

HPS

LPS

To Stripper

Water Injection

Make-up H2

RGC

Turbine

Second Stage Reactors

First Stage Reactors

Recycle H2

Water Injection

New Equipment

Existing Equipment

LPS

Page 6: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

6

Process Flow Sketch - Recovery Section

From LPS Stabilizer

Stripping Steam

Stripper

To DEA Unit

Diesel Product

Wild Naphtha

Stabilized Naphtha

To Flare

New Equipment

Existing Equipment

Page 7: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

7

The Challenges

Page 8: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

8

1. Feed Filtration • Problem

– High frequency of filter fouling → low feed pump suction pressure

– Unit slowdown → increased operating cost

– Frequent filter cartridge replacement → high maintenance costs

– Filter fouling worsens due to crude unit shutdowns & start-ups

• Corrective Actions

– Filter cartridge changed from depth to pleated type - 50% cheaper

– Separate 2HDU feed and SR diesel rundown tanks - enhanced settling time

• Results

– Increased life with use of pleated type filter cartridge

– Feed tank switchovers reduced fouling and filter cartridge replacement

– Minimised impact of crude unit shutdowns/start-ups

Page 9: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

2. Reactor Feed/Effluent Exchanger Fouling

• Problem

– Original design → makeup H2 pre-mixed with feed downstream of

feed/effluent exchangers

– Fouling in preheat trains → unit constraint towards End-of-Run

– Increases feed heater load, could force a unit shutdown unless mitigated

• Action

– Make-up and recycle H2 routings modified → Makeup H2 and a part of recycle H2 pre-mixed with feed upstream of feed/effluent exchangers

Reactor Effluent

To Feed Heater

Makeup H2

Diesel Feed

To Feed Heater

Makeup + Recycle H2

Reactor Effluent

9

Diesel Feed

Page 10: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

10

2. Reactor Feed/Effluent Exchanger Fouling (cont’d)

• Results

– Effect of H2 mixing with feed upstream of feed/effluent exchangers:

– Improved velocity → reduced shellside fouling

– Improved heat transfer coefficient

– Satisfactory performance of preheat train → exchangers not cleaned since 2007

Page 11: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

11

3. Reactor MPT Limitation

• Problem

– Minimum Pressurisation Temperature (MPT) – temperature to which

reactor wall must be heated before pressuring to >25% of design

pressure to avoid brittle fracture

– 1st stage reactors are new with low MPT (100°F @ 300 psig)

– 2nd stage reactors are old with high MPT (350°F @ 330 psig )

– High MPT causes problems during start-up:

Risk of MPT violation during feed cut-in → safety issue

Potential risk of catalyst reduction at T’s >700˚F

RGC speed limitation at lower than specified suction pressure

Extended start-up duration

Page 12: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

12

3. Reactor MPT Limitation (cont’d)

• Corrective Actions

– Conservative margin above MPT – for cooling effect due to feed cut-in

– DMDS injection into recycle gas loop at outlet of feed heater

• Results

– Minimised risk of MPT violation

– Potential catalyst reduction avoided

• Path Forward

– 2nd stage reactors permanently bypassed – sufficient volume in 1st stage

reactors to meet diesel specs with latest generation ULSD catalyst

– Bypassing 2nd stage reactors will:

Eliminate RGC speed limitation, enhance safety and reliability

Reduce start-up duration by approximately one day - cost benefit

Page 13: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

13

4. NH4Cl Formation in Reactor Effluent Exchangers

• Problem

– Chloride (0.5 wppm) in feed causes ammonium chloride (NH4Cl)

deposition in effluent side (tubeside) of exchangers

Substantial increase in pressure drop (~80 psi)

Reduced H2/Oil ratio - increased catalyst deactivation rate

Could force unit shutdown unless mitigated

• Corrective Actions

– Initially NH4Cl was removed by hot hydrogen stripping

During hot strip, feed cut out for 4 days – significant economic penalty

– Online water wash facility installed - used intermittently for NH4Cl removal

Page 14: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

• Corrective Actions (cont’d)

– Challenges encountered in design of water wash system include:

Selection and orientation of injection nozzle, space constraints, water corrosion and potential exchanger metallurgy upgrade

• Results – Eliminating feed outages – Increased average H2/Oil ratio

14

4. NH4Cl Formation in Reactor Effluent Exchangers (cont’d)

Water Injection Point Water Injection Nozzle

Page 15: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

15

5. 2HDU operation with 99.9% makeup H2 – RGC Limitation

• Problem – Design makeup gas purity is 95% maximum

– Unavailability of 93% H2 from #1H2 Plant → 2HDU shutdown

– Use of 99.9% H2 from #2H2 Plant reduces recycle gas SG <0.19

– Unstable RGC operation at SG <0.19

• Corrective Actions – Gas SG maintained >0.19 using N2 injection into recycle gas loop

– Purge rate reduced and adjustment of HP absorber operation

• Results – 2HDU operates successfully at 70% throughput when #1H2 Plant

shutdown → higher profits

– Increased unit reliability → elimination of intermediate shutdowns and startups

Page 16: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

16

6. Product Stripper Operation and Control

• Problem

– Designed to operate with total reflux → no “Wild Naphtha” product

– Design top temperature → 90 degF above water dewpoint

– In practice, top temperature falls below water dewpoint at total reflux

Risk of corrosion

• Corrective Action

– Top temperature increased to provide 15 degF margin above dewpoint

• Results

– Minimised potential risk of corrosion in column overhead

– Undesirable “Wild Naphtha” produced but manageable

Page 17: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

17

7. Stabilizer Operation

• Problems

– Limitation in reboiler firing to achieve required column bottom

temperature - diesel water spec (50 wppm) could not be met

– Column operation unstable at low throughput

• Corrective Actions – Ultimate capability of burners established

Allow reboiler outlet temperature increase

– Column now operated at lower than design operating pressure

• Results – Required diesel water specification is achieved

– Column operation stable but root causes of instability at low

throughput still being investigated

Page 18: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

18

Lessons Learned and Concluding Remarks

• Ensure feed impurities are fully defined and impact on operations fully

understood and addressed at design stage

• Always take start-up requirements into account during design phase

• 2HDU’s success over the last 6 years was achieved because we were

able to solve difficult problems mostly on the run

• Detailed process monitoring and optimisation, and prompt troubleshooting

of operational challenges paved the way for improved on-stream factor

• It is vital to have technically strong and experienced process engineers

who have an intimate knowledge of the units, their history, design,

operation and constraints

Page 19: UlSD Hydrotreater Challenges Overcome to Improve on Stream Factor - MEPEC 2013

Striving for Excellence

19

Thank You