u-charts: attribute control chart by nathan westover brigham young university november 2012

27
u-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Upload: raymundo-hatchell

Post on 01-Apr-2015

232 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

u-Charts: Attribute Control Chart

By Nathan WestoverBrigham Young University

November 2012

Page 2: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Agenda

1. U-Charts Defined

2. Brainstorming Exercise: How can this tool be used in your organization

3. Nuts and Bolts: What are Control Charts?

4. Nuts and Bolts: Attribute Control Charts vs. Variable control Charts

5. Nuts and Bolts: What information do u-Charts convey?

6. Nuts and Bolts: How u-Charts are developed?

7. How it works

8. Real World Example

9. Sample Exercise

10.Summary

11.Readings List

Page 3: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

U-Charts Defined

u-Chart: A control chart that tacks the variation in the average number of defects per unit.

Example: XXX company produces cold weather coats. For the X123 model of coat, XXX uses a u-chart to track the average number of defects each coat has from a sample.

Page 4: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Brainstorming Exercise: How can this tool be used in your organization?

• Think of a few products or product categories in your company that appear to constantly have defects

• Write these down at the top of your notepad

• Throughout the presentation think of how you can implement u-Charts with these products

Page 5: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Nuts and Bolts: What are Control Charts?

Tools for monitoring process Variation

Variables Attributes

x Process population average p Proportion Defective

x-bar Mean or Average np Number of Defective or Number non-conforming

R Range c Number nonconforming in a consistent sample space

MR Moving Range u Number of defects per unit

s Standard Deviation

Types of Control Charts

Page 6: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Nuts and Bolts: Attribute Control Charts vs. Variable Control ChartsAttribute Control Charts: Process control chart that tracks variation in either-or situations

Variable Control Charts: Process control chart that tracks variation in continuous measurements such as weight, height, or volume

Example: XXX company produces flash memory used in digital MP3 players. XXX uses an attribute control chart to track the proportion of units that are defective

Example: XXX company produces flash memory used in digital MP3 players. XXX uses a variable control chart to track the average number of flash memory that is produced per hour.

Page 7: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Defect Charts: u-Charts vs. c-Charts

u-Charts:• Average number of defects per

unit• Units do not have to be, but

can be from the same sample space

• Ex: Average number of defects in a sample of the unibody casing for all sizes of Apple Macbook Pro’s

c-Charts:• Actual number of Defects per

unit• Units must be from the same

sample space Ex. Size, Height, Length

• Ex: Actual number of defects in a sample of the unibody casing for an Apple 17” Macbook Pro

Page 8: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

What information does a u-chart convey and how can it be used?

• Non-random Variation in the average number of defects from a given sample space. That sample space can be the same or varied.

• This information can then be used in a quality rating system for rating vendors or suppliers, depending on the purpose behind using the chart.

• If the chart is for internal use, it can help a company to see the whether the variation is random or not, and can give insight as to what needs to be improved in the process

Page 9: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

How are u-chart’s developed/work?

Step 1:

• Determine the sample space that is going to be used e.g. Sample amount, Type of product, Varied number of units or standard number

Step 2:

• Collect sample data

Step 3:

• Create a control chart with upper and lower limits

Page 10: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Creating the Control Chart

• Using the sample data, Determine the sum of the defects by adding up all the defects record

Item NumberNumber of

Defects1 42 z23 34 15 5

Sample Data

Page 11: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Creating the Control Chart

• Use the Sum to Determine ū

Sample Data

Item Number Number of Defects1 42 23 34 15 5

Sum of Data 15

Page 12: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Creating the Control Chart

• Use the u-Bar to determine UCL and LCL. Because LCL ends up being negative and the LCL cannot go below 0, LCL becomes 0.

Sample Data

Item Number Number of Defects1 42 23 34 15 5

Sum of Data 15u-Bar 3

Page 13: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Creating the Control Chart

• Using the sample data, the Upper and Lower Control Limits (UCL and LCL), and u-Bar (Also Known as the Center Line, CL), Create a u-Chart

Item Number

Number of Defects UCL LCL CL

1 48.196152423 0 3

2 28.196152423 0 3

3 38.196152423 0 3

4 18.196152423 0 3

5 58.196152423 0 3

Sum of Data 15u-Bar 3

1 2 3 4 50

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

U-Chart Example

Number of DefectsUCLLCLCL

Sample Data

Page 14: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Real World Example

Libby’s Cups is a company that makes glass cups for household use. Recently Libby’s managers have been concerned with their cups having too many bubbles in the glass. However, they are unsure if this is just random variation in the process, or if it is a non-random problem that can be addressed. In order to determine whether or not this is non-random variation or not, Libby’s managers decided to randomly select 25 samples from all of their styles of cups and count the total number of defects per sample. The average sample size used is 2.

Page 15: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Real World Example (Sample Data)The following data was taken from 25 randomly selected glass cups

Item Number Number of Defects Item Number Number of Defects1 2 14 52 3 15 43 1 16 94 10 17 55 4 18 26 5 19 57 7 20 68 4 21 109 3 22 11

10 8 23 911 2 24 712 3 25 313 1

Page 16: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Real World ExampleLibby’s managers then used the data from the sample to calculate the sample mean/Center Line (CL), the Upper Control Limit (UCL) and the Lower Control Limit (LCL)

Equations Results

Page 17: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Real World Example (excel Data)Item Number Number of Defects UCL LCL CL

1 2 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.162 3 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.163 1 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.164 10 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.165 4 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.166 5 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.167 7 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.168 4 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.169 3 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.16

10 8 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1611 2 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1612 3 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1613 1 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1614 5 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1615 4 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1616 9 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1617 5 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1618 2 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1619 5 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1620 6 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1621 10 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1622 11 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1623 9 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1624 7 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.1625 3 9.978713521 0.341286479 5.16

Sum of u 129ū 5.16

Page 18: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Real World Example (excel Data Visual)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 250

2

4

6

8

10

12

Libby's Cups Example

Number of DefectsUCLLCLCL

Libby’s Managers then plotted the Data and the control limits into a control chart

Page 19: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Real World Example (Conclusion)

Interpretation:

After reviewing the chart, Libby’s managers were a bit concerned. It appeared that at certain times there was non-random variation in the number of defects in the cups. They concluded that they were probably overproducing to make sure that they compensated for those that had too many defects. They decided to evaluate the production process more thoroughly to try to reduce the amount of defects or waste in the process.

Page 20: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Sample Exercise

You have recently taken a job as the Senior Quality Manager at Xtreme Toys. Xtreme Toys specializes in making an off-road tricycle for kids. The tricycles it makes comes in several different sizes and colors. In addition they have different size wheels depending on what sort of terrain they are going to be used on.

Recently, one of Xtreme Toy’s retailors has been rejecting several lots of tricycles claiming that they have too many defects. After inspecting the returned lots, it appears that the defects seem to appear in the paint finish. Many of the tricycles have scratches in the finish and it appears to be completely random.

You are tasked my senior management to determine the cause of these defects. To assist in determining this, you decide to set up a u-chart to monitor the process. Each sample you take will be on average 3 units.

Page 21: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Sample Exercise DataItem Number Number of Defects

1 32 23 14 05 56 27 48 39 3

10 611 712 813 1114 1415 1016 617 318 319 220 521 122 223 224 425 726 827 928 1029 1130 15

Calculate:Sum of Defects

u-bar/ Center Line

Upper Control Limit

Lower Control Limit

Create: u-Chart

Analyze:Is the process in

Control?

If not, Where is it out of control?

Page 22: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Sample ExerciseSolutions:

Sum of Defects:

U-Bar/Center Line

Upper Control Limit

Lower Control Limit

Equations Calculations

Page 23: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Sample ExerciseItem Number Number of Defects UCL LCL CL

1 3 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.2666666672 2 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.2666666673 1 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.2666666674 2 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.2666666675 5 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.2666666676 2 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.2666666677 4 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.2666666678 3 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.2666666679 2 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.266666667

10 3 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666711 4 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666712 5 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666713 6 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666714 4 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666715 5 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666716 3 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666717 3 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666718 4 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666719 2 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666720 3 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666721 5 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666722 3 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666723 2 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666724 4 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666725 5 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666726 4 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666727 3 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666728 3 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666729 2 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.26666666730 1 6.397161835 0.136171498 3.266666667

Sum of u 98ū 3.266666667

Page 24: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Sample Exercise

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Sample Exercise

Number of DefectsUCLLCLCL

Page 25: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Sample ExerciseConclusion:

The process appeared to be within the control limits that had been set, however it still appeared to be trending out of control.

• Five sample means in a row were above the center line. This indicates that their may be periods of sustained poor performance which could be the root cause of the scratched or damaged lots

• Six sample means on a decreasing trend. Because the fewer defect the better, this could indicate that a problem has been fixed and that the process is improving. It would need to be monitored more closely to see if the mean has shifted.

Recommendation:

• Shut down the production line and evaluate the cause of the sustained poor performance.

Page 26: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Summary

• u-Charts are designed to track the variation in the average number of defects

• u-Charts fall into the Attribute category of Control Charts

• u-Charts do not have to be from the same sample space and can vary in the number of units per sample.

• Three steps to make a u-chart• Step 1: Determine the sample space

• Step 2: Collect sample data

• Step 3: Create control chart

Page 27: U-Charts: Attribute Control Chart By Nathan Westover Brigham Young University November 2012

Reading List

Foster, S. Thomas. Managing Quality: Integrating the Supply Chain. 4th ed. Boston: Prentice Hall, 2010. Print.

Bhat, K. Shridhara. Total Quality Management. Himalyaya: Himalaya Publishing House. Print.