trueallele ® interpretation of allegheny county dna mixtures cybergenetics © 2003-2014 continuing...

28
TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse Allegheny County Courthouse February, 2014 February, 2014 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA

Upload: sophia-baldwin

Post on 21-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

TrueAllele® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures

Cybergenetics © 2003-2014Cybergenetics © 2003-2014

Continuing Legal EducationContinuing Legal EducationAllegheny County CourthouseAllegheny County Courthouse

February, 2014February, 2014

Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhDMark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhDCybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PACybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA

Page 2: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

One person, one genotype

7

14

locus

Page 3: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

DNA dataOne or two allele peaks at a locus

Page 4: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Two people, two genotypes

7

14

10

12

locus

Page 5: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

DNA mixture dataPeak height pattern at a locus

peak size

peakheight

Page 6: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Data summary – “alleles”

Threshold

Over threshold, peaks are labeled as allele events

All-or-none allele peaks,each given equal status

Allele Pair7, 77, 107, 127, 14

10, 1010%10, 12

10, 1412, 1212, 1414, 14

Page 7: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

CPI information

CPI6.83 (2.22)6.68 million

Combined probability of inclusion

Page 8: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

SWGDAM 2010 guidelines

Threshold

Under threshold, alleles less used

Allele Pair7, 77, 107, 127, 14

10, 100%10, 12

10, 1412, 1212, 1414, 14

Higher threshold for human review

Page 9: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Modified CPI information

CPI6.83 (2.22)6.68 million

2.15 (1.68)140

mCPI

Page 10: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

SWGDAM 2010 guidelines

3.2.2. If a stochastic threshold based on peak height is not used in the evaluation of DNA typing results, the laboratory must establish alternative criteria (e.g., quantitation values or use of a probabilistic genotype approach) for addressing potential stochastic amplification. The criteria must be supported by empirical data and internal validation and must be documented in the standard operating procedures.

Use TrueAllele® Casework for DNA mixture statistics

Page 11: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

TrueAllele Casework

ViewStationUser Client

DatabaseServer

Interpret/MatchExpansion

Visual User InterfaceVUIer™ Software

Parallel Processing Computers

Page 12: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Validated genotyping methodPerlin MW, Sinelnikov A. An information gap in DNA evidence interpretation. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(12):e8327.

Perlin MW, Legler MM, Spencer CE, Smith JL, Allan WP, Belrose JL, Duceman BW. Validating TrueAllele® DNA mixture interpretation. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2011;56(6):1430-47.

Ballantyne J, Hanson EK, Perlin MW. DNA mixture genotyping by probabilistic computer interpretation of binomially-sampled laser captured cell populations: Combining quantitative data for greater identification information. Science & Justice. 2013;53(2):103-14.

Perlin MW, Belrose JL, Duceman BW. New York State TrueAllele® Casework validation study. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2013;58(6):1458-66.

Perlin MW, Dormer K, Hornyak J, Schiermeier-Wood L, Greenspoon S. TrueAllele® Casework on Virginia DNA mixture evidence: computer and manual interpretation in 72 reported criminal cases. PLOS ONE. 2014:in press.

Page 13: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

TrueAllele reinterpretation

Virginia reevaluates DNA evidence in 375 casesJuly 16, 2011

“Mixture cases are their own little nightmare,” says William Vosburgh, director of the D.C. police’s crime

lab. “It gets really tricky in a hurry.”

“If you show 10 colleagues a mixture, you will probably end up with 10 different answers”

Dr. Peter Gill, Human Identification E-Symposium, 2005

Page 14: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Report mixture statistics

• 72 criminal cases• 92 evidence items • 111 genotype comparisons

Criminal offense• 18 homicide• 12 robbery • 6 sexual assault• 20 weapon

Page 15: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Mixture weightSeparate mixture data into two contributor components

25% 75%

Page 16: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Genotype inferenceThorough: consider every possible genotype solutionObjective: does not know the comparison genotype

Explain thepeak pattern

Betterexplanationhas ahigher likelihood

Victim's allele pair

Another person's Another person's allele pairallele pair

Allele Pair7, 77, 107, 127, 14

10, 1098%10, 12

10, 1412, 1212, 1414, 14

Page 17: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Sensitivity

The extent to which interpretation identifies the correct person

101 reported genotype matches 82 with DNA statistic over a million

True DNA mixture inclusions

Page 18: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

TrueAllele sensitivity

11.05 (5.42)113 billion

TrueAllele

log(LR) match distribution

Page 19: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Specificity

The extent to which interpretation does not misidentify the wrong person

101 matching genotypes x 10,000 random references x 3 ethnic populations,

for over 1,000,000 nonmatching comparisons

True exclusions, without false inclusions

Page 20: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

TrueAllele specificity

– 19.47

log(LR) mismatch distribution

Page 21: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Reproducibility

MCMC computing has sampling variation

duplicate computer runson 101 matching genotypes

measure log(LR) variation

The extent to which interpretation givesthe same answer to the same question

Page 22: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

TrueAllele reproducibilityConcordance in two independent computer runs

standard deviation(within-group)

0.305

Page 23: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Comparison

CPI

11.05 (5.42)113 billion

6.83 (2.22)6.68 million

2.15 (1.68)140

mCPI

TrueAllele

Page 24: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Accuracy

Page 25: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

TrueAllele Virginia outcomes144 cases analyzed

72 case reports – 10 trials

City Court Charge Sentence

Richmond Federal Weapon 50 years

Alexandria Federal Bank robbery 90 years

Quantico Military Rape 3 years

Chesapeake State Robbery 26 years

Arlington State Molestation 22 years

Richmond State Homicide 35 years

Fairfax State Abduction 33 years

Norfolk State Homicide 8 years

Charlottesville State Homicide 15 years

Hampton State Home invasion 5 years

Page 26: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

TrueAllele today

Invented math & algorithms 20 years

Developed computer systems 15 years

Support users and workflow 10 laboratories

Used routinely in casework 3 labs

Validate system reliability 20 studies

Educate the community 50 talks

Train & certify analysts 200 students

Go to court for admissibility 5 hearings

Testify about LR results 20 trials

Educate lawyers and laymen 1,000 people

Make the ideas understandable 150 reports

Page 27: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Pennsylvania Cases

AlleghenyBeaverBerksButlerCambriaColumbiaDelawareIndianaLuzerneMercerYork

Page 28: TrueAllele ® interpretation of Allegheny County DNA mixtures Cybergenetics © 2003-2014 Continuing Legal Education Allegheny County Courthouse February,

Allegheny County

Crime Evidence Defendant Outcome Sentence

rape clothing Ralph Skundrich guilty awaiting

murder gun, hat Leland Davis guilty 23 years

rape clothing Akaninyene Akan guilty 32 years

murder shotgun shells James Yeckel, Jr. guilty plea 25 years

murder fingernail Anthony Morgan stipulation life

weapons gun Thomas Doswell guilty plea 1 year

drugs gun Derek McKissick& Steve Morgan

guilty pleas 2 1/2 years

16 cases, 12 reports3 trials, 1 exoneration