trends in the u.s. power sector

22
/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 1 MEGATRENDS, TIPPING POINTS, FUTURE STATE AND PATH FORWARD STATE AND FUTURE OF THE POWER INDUSTRY JAN VRINS LEADER GLOBAL ENERGY PRACTICE JULY, 2016

Upload: navigant

Post on 14-Apr-2017

2.500 views

Category:

News & Politics


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED1

MEGATRENDS, TIPPING POINTS,

FUTURE STATE AND PATH FORWARD

STATE AND FUTURE OF THE

POWER INDUSTRY

JAN VRINS

LEADER GLOBAL ENERGY PRACTICE

JULY, 2016

Page 2: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED2 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED2

MEGA TRENDS THAT DRIVE POWER INDUSTRY TRANSFORMATION

The following megatrends1 underpin the industry transformation:

1. The power of customer choice and changing demands

2. Rising number of carbon emissions reduction policies and regulations

3. Shifting power-generating sources

4. Delivering shareholder value through mergers and acquisitions (M&A)

5. Regionalizing of energy resources

6. Merging industries, new entrants, and colliding giants

7. The emerging Energy Cloud: Replacement of old infrastructure and transition

toward an increasingly decentralized and smarter power grid architecture

The transformation includes a wide range of strategic, operational, technological,

commercial, environmental, and regulatory changes that are transforming the

traditional strategies and business models.

1 Take Control of Your Future: Megatrends in the Utilities Industry

Page 3: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED3 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED3

TIPPING POINTSINDICATORS THAT THE TRANSFORMATION HAS STARTED

Power Forward: 215 Fortune 500 companies investing in GHG reductions,

sustainability, and renewable energy initiatives

DER growing 3 times faster than central station generation between 2015-2019

in the US (168 vs 57 GW)

In 2016, natural gas, solar, and wind expected to make up 93% of U.S.

generation additions

Paris Climate Agreement signed by 175 countries limiting global warming to

<2o C by 2100

AEP decommissions 11 coal plants (6,500 MW) and builds renewables (4,000 MW)

Value of utility M&A deals quadrupled in 2014-15 (compared to 2012)

CAISO saving $18.9M in first quarter of 2016 by using 113 GWH of surplus

renewable energy across participants

2018 - Tesla producing 500,000 cars per year (range > 200 miles, 30-40K)

Page 4: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED4 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED4

POWER INDUSTRY TRANSFORMATIONTHE ENERGY CLOUD1

EMERGING: THE ENERGY CLOUD

Distributed, Two-Way Power Flows

TODAY: TRADITIONAL POWER GRID

Central, One-Way Power System

1 The Energy Cloud: Emerging Opportunities on the Decentralized Grid (white paper)

©2016 Navigant Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. (Source: Navigant Consulting)

Page 5: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED5 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED5

UNDERSTANDING THE IMPACTS OF THE ENERGY CLOUD

We can begin to understand Energy Cloud transformation through the lens of

clean, distributed, and intelligent energy. These trends describe broad paradigm

shifts affecting how power is generated and consumed.

In addition to the established utility objectives of providing safe, reliable and

affordable power, utilities now need to incorporate clean, distributed and

intelligent ways of producing and delivering energy to their customers.

Page 6: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED6 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED6

UNDERSTANDING THE TIPPING POINTS

The potential for disruption that is happening can be assessed by observing five key

dimensions affecting the utility business along the lines of these additional objectives.

Page 7: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED7 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED7

STATE & FUTURE OF THE POWER INDUSTRY SURVEYBALANCED VIEWPOINTS ON DER

Which distributed energy resource

will be the most useful to utility

operations by 2025?

Which will be the most prevalent

distributed energy resource in terms

of capacity by 2025?

Page 8: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED8 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED8

STATE & FUTURE OF THE POWER INDUSTRY SURVEYBALANCED VIEWPOINTS ON DER

When will the growth of DER force a

major shift in the utility business models?

What is the most important tipping

point for utilities to aggressively pursue

owning and operating DER?

Page 9: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED9 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED9

DER IN THE UNITED STATESWE FORECAST STRONG DER PENETRATION GROWTH OVER THE NEXT DECADE

Observation

DER deployments will

reach 30 GW this year in

the US, versus new

generation (19.7GW)

Drivers

• Declining System Costs

• Supporting Policies and

Incentives

• New Business Models

• Reliability Concerns

• Product Availability

• Access to Financing

(Source: Navigant Research)

Annual Installed DER Power Capacity Additions

by DER Technology, United States: 2015-2024

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

(MW

)

Distributed Generation Distributed Energy Storage Microgrids Electric Vehicle Charging Load Demand Response Energy Efficiency

Page 10: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED10 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED10

ENERGY EFFICIENCYTHE IMPACT OF DOE RULEMAKING ON LOAD GROWTH WILL BE SIGNIFICANT

Since 2000, the DOE has published

over 45 appliance standards

Energy Efficiency savings from DOE rules

issued since 2000

• 100 quads of energy savings1

• Equivalent to eliminating all U.S.

residential energy consumption for 4

years1energy savings based on rules issued since 2000 over a period of 30

years after they were issued

Page 11: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED11 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED11

DISTRIBUTED GENERATIONRESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL SOLAR PV CONTINUES TO GROW

• Solar PV Cost (installed) will continue to decline.

• The 5 year extension of the 30% federal

investment tax credit (ITC) will drive continual

market growth.

• Utility and Community scale solar most cost

effective, but residential and commercial will

continue to grow.

Page 12: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED12 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED12

DISTRIBUTED GENERATIONC&I SOLAR PV AT GRID PARITY IN MANY PARTS OF THE U.S.

Page 13: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED13 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED13

DISTRIBUTED GENERATIONC&I SOLAR - TOP U.S. COMPANIES

Sources: SEIA’s Solar Means Business, 2014, Navigant 2015

The Top 25 U.S. Fortune 1000 companies have installed nearly 500 MW of on-site solar PV; many of the leaders have mature supplier relationships.

Commercial Company Solar PV Partner(s)

Ikea REC Solar, Inovateus Solar

Costco REC Solar, PermaCity

Fresh & Easy REC Solar

Walmart SolarCity

Walgreens SolarCity

Westfield Mall Solar City, Martifer Solar USA

Kohl’s Sun Edison

Staples SunEdison

WholeFoods Market Sun Edison

Macy’s Sunpower

Johnson & Johnson Sunpower

Ford Motor Company Sunpower

Hertz Martifer Solar USA

FedEx BP Solar

Top 15 Corporate Solar PV Companies

(MW installed)

Corporate Solar PV Relationships

Page 14: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED14 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED14

DEMAND RESPONSETECHNOLOGY IS ENABLING DR RESOURCES TO RESPOND MORE LIKE GENERATION

Availability

• 24/7, year-round availability

• Dispatchable dozens or hundreds

of times per year

Speed of Response

• Spinning reserves (<10 min.)

• Frequency response/regulation

services

Performance

• Ramp-up and down

• ISO-qualifying precision of

delivered MW

• Real-time visibility from control

room

• Improved customer experience

Page 15: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED15 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED15

DISTRIBUTED STORAGECOMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL

• Business case based around reduction of demand charges and energy cost

management

• Vendors are now offering third party financing. - No money down installation

- Shared savings model

- Minimal risk or involvement required of customers

• Leading vendors include: Stem, Green Charge Networks, Coda Energy, Sharp

Source: Sharp

Reduction of Demand Charge

Page 16: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED16 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED16

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

(Gw

H)

ELECTRIC VEHICLESALTHOUGH EARLY, ADOPTION WILL CONTINUE

• Electric Vehicles are large opportunity for utility load growth

• Workplace and home charging can be timed to grid requirements (peak load)

• Investments in charging infrastructure is beneficial for utilities

• EV adoption rates differs greatly by region and will depend on:

– Regulations

– Gasoline prices & battery costs

– Range & recharge time

– Charging infrastructure

– Electric resale rules

– Consumer preferences

(Source: Navigant Research)

Road Transportation Electricity

Consumption, U.S. : 2015-2035

(Source: Navigant Research)

Page 17: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED17 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED17

IMPLICATIONS FOR UTILITIESSTRATEGY AND BUSINESS MODELS

Customer choice and technology drive regulatory changes,

new entrants, and business models

Rate design must integrate DER to fairly compensate utilities

and DER owners/operators for the value they provide

More fluid, incentive-oriented frameworks needed to support

innovation and modernization and operations investments

Incumbent utilities can adapt to DER trends and incorporate into

integrated resource planning and operations—must do so

without disrupting current model (safe, reliable, affordable

power)

Page 18: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED18 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED18

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PARTICIPANTS ECOSYSTEM WILL EVOLVE TO ACCOMMODATE DER PENETRATION.

o Basic power products for

Residential and C&I

o Safe

o Reliable

o Affordable

o Individualized Energy

Products and Services

o S/R/A

o Clean

o Distributed

o Intelligent

• Regulation

• Governance

• Strategy

• Business models

• Processes/systems

• Standards

ECOSYSTEM

Page 19: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED19 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED19

IMPLICATIONS FOR UTILITIES EXAMPLES OF CURRENT DER BUSINESS MODELS

Utility DER Program

Arizona Public

Service

Solar PV Pilot program where they own and rate base

residential PV systems that are grid-tied;

participating customers are on specific feeders and

receive $30/month for hosting the PV system.

Detroit Edison Solar PV Community solar program in which DTE owns and

operates the PV systems and offers their customers

subscriptions to the projects.

Exelon Microgrids Exelon is developing microgrids across its territory.

ComEd is moving forward with 6 microgrids in

Northern Illinois.

San Diego Gas and

Electric

Energy Storage Proposed a plan for customers – on targeted feeders

- to own energy storage, but SDG&E has ability to

dispatch systems during peak events.

Page 20: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED20 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED20

IMPLICATIONS FOR UTILITIES DER STRATEGY AND BUSINESS MODEL DECISIONS

There is broad variance among utilities planning for a transition to the Energy

Cloud. They can select from a variety of DER business models for development

and ownership.

Model Selection Rationale

1. Integrate, develop, and own DER

Utility has DER integration experience and has no

difficulty with designing, integrating, and controlling with

in-house resources.

2. Develop and own DERUtility has the in house capability to handle permitting,

site selection, financing, and interconnection.

3. Purchase a turnkey solution

Due to DER specific knowledge, it may be more

economical to have a third party handle the project

development and site preparation tasks.

4. Contract servicesDue to the regulatory environment, utility contracts

services from 3rd Parties.

Assess Strategize Pilot Implement Integrate (iDER)

Page 21: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED21 / ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED21

IMPLICATIONS FOR UTILITIES DIFFERING PATHS FORWARD

Utility Grid Reform (going from maturity level 4 to 5)

One example utility, that operates in what could characterized as a

Grid Reform state i.e. aggressive renewable and distributed

policies, has taken a decidedly Energy Cloud mindset. Anticipating

a more networked grid, this utility has begun developing new

services – integrating EV charging with demand response, offering

bring your own device programs to customers, etc. – to serve an

integrated, ‘plug-and-play’ electricity system that it believes will

enhance the value of individual assets across the network. With the

goal of shifting away from the traditional ratepayer model, this utility

is taking steps to provide customers maximum flexibility and choice

in how they use energy in order to maximize value across the

network. To accomplish this, this utility has proactively built

collaborative partnerships with technology providers.

Utility Business as Usual (going from maturity level 1 to 2)

One example utility in a state representative of BAU, stayed the

course on investing in traditional generation assets and was

reluctant to even pursue AMI investments. However, disappointing

load growth and increased federal regulations targeting fossil

generation of late, have begun undermining long-standing

assumptions, causing management to re-evaluate priorities. This

includes surveying DER opportunities and contemplating shifting

investments toward distribution automation assets and services.

The questions remain whether these efforts will be too little, too

late, as their customers increasingly become targets for third-party

providers of energy services.

Page 22: Trends in the U.S. Power Sector

/ ©2016 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED22

JAN VRINS

Leader Global Energy Practice

+1.305.341.7839

[email protected]

Navigant Energy Practice

http://www.navigant.com/industries/energy

Navigant Research

http://www.navigantresearch.com/

navigant.com

CONTACT