transportation utility fee (tuf)...

Transportation Utility Fee (TUF) Update Transportation Committee– December 2014

Overview

• TUF Program Accomplishments• TUF Program Accomplishments

• TUF Program Needs

• TUF Fund Performance

• Potential Program Modifications

• Next Steps

“Getting TUF on our streets.”

Program Accomplishments

Bicycle & Pedestrian Capital Improvement (BPCIP) ‐ NE 37th Avenue

• Main to Brogden

• Street improvement including curb streetincluding, curb, street trees, street lighting, storm sewer, and water upgradesupgrades.

• Estimated Total Cost: $1.55 Million

• Budgeted TUF: $750,000

• CompletedCompleted


Program AccomplishmentsAdditional BPCIP

• SE Spruce St Sidewalk Infill – 13th to 21stSE Spruce St Sidewalk Infill 13 to 21

• Completed 2010

AfterBefore


Program AccomplishmentsAdditional BPCIP

• SE 18th Ave Improvement – Maple to WalnutSE 18th Ave Improvement Maple to Walnut

• Completed 2011

AfterBefore


Program AccomplishmentsADA Ramp Installation & Upgrades

• Federal requirement to install ramps where sidewalks exist andFederal requirement to install ramps where sidewalks exist and no ramp is present and bring all other ramps to current standard.

• City must also bring all ramps up to current standards when• City must also bring all ramps up to current standards when streets are overlaid or micro sealed.

AfterBefore ‐ Non Standard Before‐No Ramp



Pavement Management Program (PMP)‐New Technologies

• Introduced Micro Sealing 2009

– Reduced deferrals by $2.5 Million the first year.• Testing Fiber Reinforced Slurry Seal

– Applied first tests in 2012

– Potential to improve reflective cracking from underlying asphalt.Potential to improve reflective cracking from underlying asphalt.

• Testing Fiber Reinforced Asphalt– Applied first tests in 2013

– Potential to allow reduction in asphalt thickness.

– Potential to improve resistance to reflective cracking from older asphalt



90%

100%

Condition by Centerline Miles

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Net

wor

k

20%

30%

40%

50%

Perc

enta

ge o

f

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014EXCELLENT (86 TO 100) 93.47 95.34 100.79 107.72 121.34 117.69 121.45 127.46 128.92 125.20VERY GOOD (71 TO 85) 66.03 63.82 62.26 59.16 59.63 60.72 56.35 54.44 56.14 59.04GOOD (56 TO 70) 22 41 26 94 26 10 24 91 18 51 23 87 24 74 22 93 18 63 18 54

0%

10%

GOOD (56 TO 70) 22.41 26.94 26.10 24.91 18.51 23.87 24.74 22.93 18.63 18.54FAIR (41 TO 55) 10.10 11.43 10.02 11.52 8.76 7.82 9.52 8.09 13.03 11.44POOR (26 TO 40) 5.73 5.73 6.54 4.73 3.52 3.46 2.36 2.08 1.20 2.61VERY POOR (11 TO 25) 4.12 4.71 4.34 4.02 3.16 2.04 1.78 1.39 1.47 2.04FAILED (1 TO 10) 0.82 0.60 0.88 0.84 0.65 0.42 0.16 0.10 0.15 0.37UNRATED* 9.23 5.51 5.95 6.83 4.78 5.71 5.42 6.11 4.71 5.04


Year


$3,500,000

$4,000,000 Funding by Maintenance Type

$2,500,000

$3,000,000

$1,500,000

$2,000,000

$500,000

$1,000,000

FY 03‐04 FY 04‐05 FY 05‐06 FY 06‐07 FY 07‐08 FY 08‐09 FY 09‐10 FY 10‐11 FY 11‐12 FY 12‐13 FY 13‐14 FY 14‐15

Remaining Expenditures $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $1,292,238

Rehabilitation $605,529 $413,544 $1,628,695 $1,194,687 $1,213,714 $1,249,216 $476,696 $523,424 $1,146,268 $1,797,902 $2,479,919 $1,554,803

Preventative $208 992 $118 361 $486 878 $410 295 $317 031 $354 826 $493 027 $702 128 $672 109 $1 075 149 $971 631 $726 459

$‐


*FY 14‐15 Expenditures to date. $1.1 Million of expenditures of rehabilitation still planned for reconstruction of Griffin Oaks. Possible Crack Seal & AC Replacement contract.

Preventative $208,992 $118,361 $486,878 $410,295 $317,031 $354,826 $493,027 $702,128 $672,109 $1,075,149 $971,631 $726,459


Maintenance History (Centerline miles treated)

2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15

Crack Seals 42.7 35.2 28.3 19.7 0

Slurry Seal 10.0 14.5 7.1 7.1 7.5y

Micro‐Surfacing 2.2 4.6 4.9 3.8 4.5

AC Replacements 6.4 1.9 3.4 1.5 0

Subtotal Preventative Maintenance 12.2 53.7 51.6 43.6 32.1 12

Overlay 1.3 3.9 3.9 2.6 2.4

PCC Reconstruction 0.10.4

Pending

Subtotal Rehabilitative Maintenance 1 3 3 9 3 9 2 72.8

(w/Pending)Subtotal Rehabilitative Maintenance 1.3 3.9 3.9 2.7 (w/Pending)

Total 12.2 55.0 55.5 47.5 34.814.8

(w/pending)


PMP Deferrals

$11 762

$14,000 Annual Deferrals

$9,062

$10,020

$8 503$9,374

$11,762

$9,615 $10,000

$12,000

s

$6,443 $6,718 $6,704

$8,214 $8,503

$6,000

$8,000

Thou

sand

s

$

$4,000

T

$‐

$2,000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Year


Year

Historical Treatment Costs

2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 Percent Change*

Crack Seals (per LF) $ 0.42 $ 0.62 $ 0.62 $ 0.59 + 40%

Slurry Seal (per Sq. Yd.) $ 1.20 $ 1.54 $ 2.09 $ 1.61 $ 1.51 + 26%

Micro‐Surfacing (per Sq. Yd.) $ 4.38 $ 4.50 $ 4.60 $ 4.48 $ 5.27 + 20%

AC Replacements (per Sq. Yd.) $ 27.92 $ 26.50 $ 30.57 $ 35.12 $ 42.77 + 53%

Overlay (per Sq Yd ) $ 15 73 $ 16 59 $ 21 23 $ 31 03 $ 26 04 + 66%Overlay (per Sq. Yd.) $ 15.73 $ 16.59 $ 21.23 $ 31.03 $ 26.04 + 66%

*Percentage change is from earliest year of data to last year of data.


Program Needs – ADA Improvements


Program Needs ‐ Sidewalks


Program Needs ‐ PMP


Program Needs ‐ PMP

$14,000,000

PMP Historical & Projected Deferrals‐10 Years

HISTORICAL

$10,000,000

$12,000,000

HISTORICAL

$3.4M

$3.6M

$3.8M

$6,000,000

$8,000,000

$2,000,000

$4,000,000

*All funding scenarios assume that revenues are increased 6% annually

$‐

$ , ,

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024


All funding scenarios assume that revenues are increased 6% annually.

TUF Fund PerformanceFY 2009‐10 FY 2010‐11 FY 2011‐12 FY 2012‐13 FY 2013‐14 FY 2014‐2015*

TUF PMP $874,070 $848,349 $904,830 $932,098 $944,877 $1,008,376

$ $ $ $ $ $TUF BPCIP $882,876 $749,575 $771,068 $784,213 $803,404 $850,025

Total $1,756,945 $1,597,924 $1,675,897 $1,716,311 $1,748,281 $1,858,401

• TUF rates have been adjusted 3 times– FY 2009‐10: Reduced multifamily rates.

– FY 2010‐11: Re‐allocated in accordance with TUF MethodologyFY 2010 11: Re allocated in accordance with TUF Methodology (revenue neutral).

– FY 2011‐12: Increased rates to generate 4% increase in TUF PMP.

No changes have been made to TUF BPCIP rates– No changes have been made to TUF BPCIP rates.

• Currently collect ~10% more in TUF PMP than at adoption.


*FY 2014‐15Projected Year End

TUF Fund Performance

TUF Administration Costs

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

TUF Fund Performance $1,756,945.00 $1,597,924.00 $1,675,897.00 $1,716,311.00 $1,748,281.00

4% Maximum Administration $70,277.80 $63,916.96 $67,035.88 $68,652.44 $69,931.24

Actual Administration Charges $23 562 08 $42 123 99 $29 500 29 $8 193 40 $19 666 74Actual Administration Charges $23,562.08 $42,123.99 $29,500.29 $8,193.40 $19,666.74

Actual Adminstration Percentage 1.3% 2.6% 1.8% 0.5% 1.1%


Discounts & Waivers

Residential Programs

• Waivers: – Vacancy : TUF suspended if water service suspended.

– Unemployment : 6 month waiver when someone in household has been recentlyUnemployment : 6 month waiver when someone in household has been recently laid off.

– Hardship: One year waiver for residents whose income is below 60% of the median

Oregon income Annual AnnualOregon income. Number in Family

Annual Poverty Income

Annual Median Income

60% Median‐Annual

60% Median ‐Monthly

1 $ 11,490 $ 42,500 $ 25,500 $ 2,125 2 $ 15,510 $ 48,600 $ 29,160 $ 2,430 3 $ 19 530 $ 54 600 $ 32 760 $ 2 7303 $ 19,530 $ 54,600 $ 32,760 $ 2,730 4 $ 23,550 $ 60,700 $ 36,420 $ 3,035 5 $ 27,570 $ 65,600 $ 39,360 $ 3,280 6 $ 31,590 $ 70,400 $ 42,240 $ 3,520 7 $ 35,610 $ 75,300 $ 45,180 $ 3,765 8 $ 39 630 $ 80 100 $ 48 060 $ 4 005


8 $ 39,630 $ 80,100 $ 48,060 $ 4,005

Discounts & Waivers

Residential Programs

• Discounts: – Motor Vehicle: 30 % discount for residents who don’t own a vehicle.

– Transit : 30% discount for residents who have purchased and annual TriMet pass.Transit : 30% discount for residents who have purchased and annual TriMet pass.

• Only one discount or waiver is applied at a time.

• All discounts and waivers are renewable.


Discounts & Waivers

Non‐Residential Programs

• Vacancy Waiver: TUF is suspended when water service is suspended.

• Transit Discount: Up to a 30% discount for employers that purchase TriMet passes for their employeesTriMet passes for their employees.

• DEQ/Eco Discount: discount for employers that have an approved commute option program. Discount is equal to the trip reduction d d b h fdemonstrated by the program up to a maximum of 30%.

• Discount programs for Non‐Residential may be combined up to a maximum of 30% and renewed annually.


Discounts & Waivers

$

$35,000

$40,000

$20,000

$25,000

$30,000

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

EMPLOYER DEQ/ECO DISCOUNT $84 $657 $572 $‐ $‐ $‐

EMPLOYER TRANSIT DISCOUNT $1,955 $10,455 $2,001 $168 $‐ $‐

$‐

$5,000

RES TUF TRANSIT DISCOUNT $64 $246 $333 $463 $638 $636

RES TUF MOTOR VEHICLE DISCOUNT $6 $73 $30 $23 $23 $23

RES UNEMPLOYMENT WAIVER $434 $1,848 $689 $321 $280 $159

RES HARDSHIP WAIVER $2,821 $21,048 $13,309 $10,876 $9,944 $7,433


Discounts & Waivers

Forgone Revenue & Associated Administrative Costs

$30 000

$35,000

$40,000

$20,000

$25,000

$30,000

$10,000

$15,000

FY 2008‐09 FY 2009‐10 FY 2010‐11 FY 2011‐12 FY 2012‐13 FY 2013‐14

Discounts and Waivers Annual Credits $7,372 $36,209 $18,820 $13,863 $12,898 $10,265

$‐

$5,000

$ , $ , $ , $ , $ , $ ,

Discounts & Waivers PW Admin Costs $63 $6,940 $8,572 $7,155 $5,515 $2,816


Funding Forecast

$6,000,000

$3.6 Million Annual Contract(with 6% annual revenue increase)

$4,000,000

$5,000,000

$

$3,000,000

$ , ,

$1,000,000

$2,000,000

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Shortfall $489,464 $1,379,253 $1,581,999 $1,795,427 $2,023,315

SIP $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000

Transportation Fund $1,200,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000

$‐


TUF PMP $1,008,376 $1,028,544 $1,049,114 $1,070,097 $1,091,499

Proposed Changes

Residential/Non‐Residential Share ‐ Existing

• Currently 52% Residential/48% Non Residential• Currently 52% Residential/48% Non Residential– Based on Metro determination of residential, commercial, and

industrial use of collectors and arterials.

N d f l l d i hb h d hi h f h– No data for local and neighborhood routes which account for the majority of Hillsboro’s network.

– Doesn’t differentiate between local streets that are residential d l l h i l i d i land local streets that are commercial or industrial.

– Doesn’t account for alleys.

Cl ifi ti L Mil R id ti l C i l I d t i l P bliClassification Lane Miles Residential Commercial Industrial Public

Arterials 17.23 45% 35% 15% 5%

Collectors 125.16 50% 30% 15% 5%

Local/Neighborhood Routes 324.38 60% 25% 10% 5%


Proposed Changes

Residential/Non Residential Share Proposed

• Split share of arterials, collectors, neighborhood routes 50/50. Maintenance Shareroutes 50/50.

• Assign local commercial & industrial streets to non residential

Classification Residential Non ResidentialArterials 50% 50%Collectors 50% 50%Neigborhood Routes 50% 50%Local Commerical/Industrial Streets 0% 100%

non‐residential customers.

• Assign local residential

Local Residential Streets 100% 0%Alleys 100% 0%

streets and alleys to residential customers.


Proposed Changes

Residential/Non Residential Share ‐ Proposed

• 75% Residential/25 % Non‐Residential

Maintenance Share Lane Mile Share

Classification

Maintenance Share

Total Lane Miles

Lane Mile Share

Residential Non Residential Residential Non ResidentialArterials 50% 50% 17.65 8.83 8.83Collectors 50% 50% 130.54 65.27 65.27Neigborhood Routes 50% 50% 50 37 25 19 25 19Neigborhood Routes 50% 50% 50.37 25.19 25.19Local Commerical/Industrial Streets 0% 100% 19.38 0.00 19.38Local Residential Streets 100% 0% 243.23 243.23 0.00Alleys 100% 0% 7.37 7.37 0.00Total 468.54 349.88 118.66

74 7% 25 3%74.7% 25.3%


Proposed Rate Change – Scenario ACURRENT 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020

RATESNON RESIDENTIAL

NON RESIDENTIAL‐1 $ 0.21 $ 0.22 $ 0.24 $ 0.25 $ 0.27 $ 0.28 NON RESIDENTIAL‐2 $ 0.49 $ 0.52 $ 0.55 $ 0.58 $ 0.62 $ 0.66 NON RESIDENTIAL‐3 $ 1 63 $ 1 73 $ 1 83 $ 1 94 $ 2 06 $ 2 18NON RESIDENTIAL‐3 $ 1.63 $ 1.73 $ 1.83 $ 1.94 $ 2.06 $ 2.18 NON RESIDENTIAL‐4 $ 3.64 $ 3.86 $ 4.09 $ 4.34 $ 4.60 $ 4.87 NON RESIDENTIAL‐5 $ 9.58 $ 10.15 $ 10.76 $ 11.41 $ 12.09 $ 12.82 NON RESIDENTIAL‐6 $ 19.42 $ 20.59 $ 21.82 $ 23.13 $ 24.52 $ 25.99 NON RESIDENTIAL‐7 $ 0.04 $ 0.04 $ 0.04 $ 0.05 $ 0.05 $ 0.05

NON RESIDENTIAL BASE CHARGE $ 2.87 $ 4.50 $ 4.77 $ 5.05 $ 5.36 $ 5.68 RESIDENTIAL

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL‐8 $ 3.18 $ 5.00 $ 5.30 $ 5.61 $ 5.95 $ 6.31 MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL‐9 $ 2.87 $ 4.50 $ 4.77 $ 5.05 $ 5.36 $ 5.68

ANNUAL REVENUEBPCIP (ALL FROM RESIDENTIAL) $ 818,132 $ 817,324 $ 866,363 $ 918,345 $ 973,446 $ 1,031,852

PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) NON RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 484,020 $ 499,212 $ 529,165 $ 560,915 $ 594,570 $ 630,244 RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 524,356 $ 1,238,403 $ 1,312,707 $ 1,391,470 $ 1,474,958 $ 1,563,455

TOTAL PMP $ 1,008,376 $ 1,737,615 $ 1,841,872 $ 1,952,385 $ 2,069,528 $ 2,193,699

PMP NEEDS PMP NEED (ADMINISTRATION & CONTRACT) $ 3,697,840 $ 3,907,797 $ 4,130,113 $ 4,365,524 $ 4,614,814 $ 4,878,806

‐CARRY OVER/RESERVES $ 489,464‐TUF PMP $ 1,008,376 $ 1,737,615 $ 1,841,872 $ 1,952,385 $ 2,069,528 $ 2,193,699

SHORTFALL W/O OTHER FUNDS $ 2,200,000 $ 2,170,182 $ 2,288,241 $ 2,413,139 $ 2,545,286 $ 2,685,107 ‐TRANSPORTATION FUND (GAS TAX/OTIA) $ 1,200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000

SHORTFALL AFTER TRANSPORTATION $ 1,000,000 $ 1,670,182 $ 1,788,241 $ 1,913,139 $ 2,045,286 $ 2,185,107 W/$1 M FROM BUDGETED SIP

SHORTFALL AFTER TRANSPORTATION FUND $ 1,000,000 $ 1,670,182 $ 1,788,241 $ 1,913,139 $ 2,045,286 $ 2,185,107 ‐SIP $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000


SHORTFALL $ 0 $ 670,182 $ 788,241 $ 913,139 $ 1,045,286 $ 1,185,107

Proposed Rate Change – Scenario A

436450

500 Non Residential Customers Monthly Bill Change – 1st Year

436

364

350

400

450

250

300

tomer Cou

nt

138

77 100

150

200

Cust

‐

60

23 10 14 8

32

7 1 ‐ ‐ 1 ‐‐

50

$0.00 ‐$1

$1.01 ‐$2

$2.01 ‐$3

$3.01 ‐$4

$4.01 ‐$5

$5.01 ‐$6

$6.01 ‐$7

$7.01 ‐$8

$8.01 ‐$9

$9.01 ‐$10

$20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00


$1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10

Proposed Rate Change – Scenario BCURRENT 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020


NON RESIDENTIAL‐1 $ 0.21 $ 0.24 $ 0.27 $ 0.29 $ 0.31 $ 0.34 NON RESIDENTIAL‐2 $ 0.49 $ 0.56 $ 0.63 $ 0.70 $ 0.76 $ 0.82 NON RESIDENTIAL 3 $ 1 63 $ 1 94 $ 2 25 $ 2 55 $ 2 77 $ 3 01NON RESIDENTIAL‐3 $ 1.63 $ 1.94 $ 2.25 $ 2.55 $ 2.77 $ 3.01 NON RESIDENTIAL‐4 $ 3.64 $ 4.14 $ 4.64 $ 5.13 $ 5.58 $ 6.06 NON RESIDENTIAL‐5 $ 9.58 $ 10.88 $ 12.18 $ 13.46 $ 14.65 $ 15.91 NON RESIDENTIAL‐6 $ 19.42 $ 24.19 $ 28.96 $ 33.72 $ 36.70 $ 39.86 NON RESIDENTIAL‐7 $ 0.04 $ 0.05 $ 0.06 $ 0.07 $ 0.07 $ 0.08

NON RESIDENTIAL BASE CHARGE $ 2.87 $ 4.18 $ 5.49 $ 6.81 $ 7.34 $ 7.91 RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL


ANNUAL REVENUEBPCIP (ALL FROM RESIDENTIAL) $ 818,132 $ 865,169 $ 912,206 $ 962,309 $ 1,020,047 $ 1,081,250

PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) NON RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 484,020 $ 541,757 $ 632,024 $ 716,381 $ 778,704 $ 844,702NON RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 484,020 $ 541,757 $ 632,024 $ 716,381 $ 778,704 $ 844,702 RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 524,356 $ 1,041,853 $ 1,650,908 $ 2,149,143 $ 2,336,111 $ 2,534,105

TOTAL PMP $ 1,008,376 $ 1,583,610 $ 2,282,932 $ 2,865,524 $ 3,114,814 $ 3,378,806


‐CARRY OVER/RESERVES $ 489,464‐TUF PMP $ 1 008 376 $ 1 583 610 $ 2 282 932 $ 2 865 524 $ 3 114 814 $ 3 378 806‐TUF PMP $ 1,008,376 $ 1,583,610 $ 2,282,932 $ 2,865,524 $ 3,114,814 $ 3,378,806

SHORTFALL W/O OTHER FUNDS $ 2,200,000 $ 2,324,187 $ 1,847,181 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 ‐TRANSPORTATION FUND $ 1,200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000

SHORTFALL AFTER TRANSPORTATION $ 1,000,000 $ 1,824,187 $ 1,347,181 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 W/$1 M FROM BUDGETED SIP

SHORTFALL AFTER TRANSPORTATION FUND $ 1,000,000 $ 1,824,187 $ 1,347,181 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 SIP $ 1 000 000 $ 1 000 000 $ 1 000 000 $ 1 000 000 $ 1 000 000 $ 1 000 000


‐SIP $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 SHORTFALL $ 0 $ 824,187 $ 347,181 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐

Proposed Rate Change – Scenario B400

Non‐Residential Customer Monthly Bill Change – First Year

335

253

300

350

253

200

250

stom

er Cou

nt

124

82 77

119

100

150

Cus

‐

77

40

25 37

22 27 17

7 7 3 1 ‐ 1 1 ‐

50


$0.00 ‐$1

$1.01 ‐$2

$2.01 ‐$3

$3.01 ‐$4

$4.01 ‐$5

$5.01 ‐$6

$6.01 ‐$7

$7.01 ‐$8

$8.01 ‐$9

$9.01 ‐$10

$20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $100.00 $200.00

Proposed Rate Change – Scenario B1CURRENT 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020


NON RESIDENTIAL‐1 $ 0.21 $ 0.27 $ 0.33 $ 0.39 $ 0.42 $ 0.45 NON RESIDENTIAL‐2 $ 0.49 $ 0.64 $ 0.79 $ 0.95 $ 1.01 $ 1.08 NON RESIDENTIAL 3 $ 1 63 $ 2 25 $ 2 86 $ 3 48 $ 3 70 $ 3 94NON RESIDENTIAL‐3 $ 1.63 $ 2.25 $ 2.86 $ 3.48 $ 3.70 $ 3.94 NON RESIDENTIAL‐4 $ 3.64 $ 4.76 $ 5.88 $ 7.01 $ 7.46 $ 7.94 NON RESIDENTIAL‐5 $ 9.58 $ 12.52 $ 15.46 $ 18.40 $ 19.59 $ 20.85 NON RESIDENTIAL‐6 $ 19.42 $ 28.31 $ 37.20 $ 46.08 $ 49.06 $ 52.21 NON RESIDENTIAL‐7 $ 0.04 $ 0.06 $ 0.08 $ 0.09 $ 0.10 $ 0.10

NON RESIDENTIAL BASE CHARGE $ 2.87 $ 4.72 $ 6.57 $ 8.42 $ 8.96 $ 9.52 RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL


ANNUAL REVENUEBPCIP (ALL FROM RESIDENTIAL) $ 818,132 $ 835,229 $ 901,914 $ 950,732 $ 1,007,775 $ 1,068,242

PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) NON RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 484,020 $ 623,979 $ 795,525 $ 966,381 $ 1,028,704 $ 1,094,702 $ , $ , $ , $ , $ , , $ , ,RESIDENTIAL PMP $ 524,356 $ 1,292,987 $ 2,094,466 $ 2,899,143 $ 3,086,111 $ 3,284,105

TOTAL PMP $ 1,008,376 $ 1,916,966 $ 2,889,990 $ 3,865,524 $ 4,114,814 $ 4,378,806


‐CARRY OVER/RESERVES $ 489,464‐TUF PMP $ 1 008 376 $ 1 916 966 $ 2 889 990 $ 3 865 524 $ 4 114 814 $ 4 378 806TUF PMP $ 1,008,376 $ 1,916,966 $ 2,889,990 $ 3,865,524 $ 4,114,814 $ 4,378,806

SHORTFALL W/O OTHER FUNDS $ 2,200,000 $ 1,990,831 $ 1,240,123 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 ‐TRANSPORTATION FUND $ 1,200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000

SHORTFALL AFTER TRANSPORTATION $ 1,000,000 $ 1,490,831 $ 740,123 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐W/NO CITY CONTRIBUTIONS

SHORTFALL AFTER TRANSPORTATION FUND $ 1,000,000 $ 1,490,831 $ 740,123 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐‐SIP $ 1 000 000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐


SIP $ 1,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ SHORTFALL $ 0 $ 1,490,831 $ 740,123 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐

Proposed Rate Change – Scenario B1

252

300 Non‐Residential Customer Monthly Bill Change – First Year

252

185 200

250

162

118

150

Custom

er Cou

nt

76

54 47

72

44 50

100

‐

32 34 36

20

7 4 10 7 3

12

‐ 1 ‐

50

$0.00 ‐$1

$1.01 ‐$2

$2.01 ‐$3

$3.01 ‐$4

$4.01 ‐$5

$5.01 ‐$6

$6.01 ‐$7

$7.01 ‐$8

$8.01 ‐$9

$9.01 ‐$10

$20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $100.00 $200.00 $300.00 $400.00


Rate Comparison

CITY

PSU 2013 CertifiedPopulation Estimates

CENTERLANE MILES

MAINTAINED SFR MFR

100000 SQ.FT.

MANUFACTURING

30,000 GENERAL OFFICE

BUILDING

20,000 SPECIALTY

RETAIL 100,000 SUPER

MARKET

10,000 DRIVE IN

BANK

5000 FAST FOOD

RESTAURANT W/DT

North Plains 2,015 14.21 $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 450.00 $ 135.00 $ 450.00 $ 1,350.00 NA $ 162.00

C lli 55 345 187 00 $ 1 36 $ 0 94 $ 8 02 $ 6 94 $ 18 61 $ 214 70 $ 51 76 $ 52 09Corvallis 55,345 187.00 $ 1.36 $ 0.94 $ 8.02 $ 6.94 $ 18.61 $ 214.70 $ 51.76 $ 52.09

Philomath 4,625 16.01 $ 2.00 $ 1.60 $ 12.45 $ 9.25 $ 12.45 $ 22.75 $ 12.45 $ 12.45

Phoenix 4,570 19.47 $ 2.21 $ 1.46 $ 6.12 $ 52.93 $ 142.03 $ 1,146.71 $ 209.24 $ 43.72

Hillsboro 93,340 224.24 $ 3.18 $ 2.87 $ 21.00 $14.70 $ 32.60 $ 364.00 $ 95.80 $ 97.10 Milwaukie 20,500 74.01 $ 3.35 $ 2.10 $ 133.70 $ 115.61 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 250.00

Grants Pass 34,855 151.29 $ 3.42 $ 2.13 $ 11.40 $ 11.40 $ 34.19 $ 341.94 $ 34.19 $ 11.40

Tualatin 26,510 68.79 $ 3.92 $ 3.36 $ 77.50 $ 52.30 $ 90.30 $ 1,110.50 $ 297.60 $ 366.15

Talent 6,170 21.79 $ 3.93 $ 2.72 $ 264.86 $ 106.70 $ 91.20 $ 937.15 $ 93.71 $ 158.67

Wilsonville 21,550 7.64 $ 4.03 $ 2.62 $ 64.33 $ 64.33 $ 113.33 $ 285.88 $ 64.33 $ 113.33

Dufur 605 6.86 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00

Bay City 1,310 11.69 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 Unavailable

Hubbard 3,200 12.33 $ 5.20 $ 5.20 $4.50 per EDU

Clatskanie 1,745 10.20 $ 5.50 $ 5.50 $8.00 per month per unit Commercial / Motel, Hotel

Tigard 49,135 151.43 $ 5.83 $ 5.83 $1.31per parking space or fueling position

Eagle Point 8,575 39.68 $ 6.00 $ 6.00 $ 175.00 $ 151.20 $ 405.40 $ 1,237.00 $ 304.40 $ 434.75

La Grande 13,125 87.35 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 $ 8.00

Lake Oswego 36 990 167 33 $ 8 01 $ 5 72 $ 490 00 $ 330 90 $ 220 60 $ 1 103 00 $ 411 90 $ 205 95Lake Oswego 36,990 167.33 $ 8.01 $ 5.72 $ 490.00 $ 330.90 $ 220.60 $ 1,103.00 $ 411.90 $ 205.95

Ashland 20,295 102.99 $ 8.17 $ 6.23 $ 640.00 $ 222.00 $ 222.00 $ 1,110.00 $ 99.00 $ 146.00

Medford 75,920 280.70 $ 8.46 $ 5.42 $ 442.40 $ 293.31 $ 557.65 $ 3,758.19 $ 801.85 $ 499.91

Oregon City 33,990 135.60 $ 11.56 $ 8.12 $ 75.64 $ 65.40 $ 175.51 $ 535.59 $ 131.77 $ 188.18

Average $ 7.41 $ 6.22 $ 386.01 $ 193.57 $ 318.38 $ 1,801.26 $ 344.21 $ 278.03

High $ 11.56 $ 8.12 $ 640.00 $ 330.90 $ 557.65 $ 3,758.19 $ 801.85 $ 499.91

$ $ $ $ $ $ $


Low $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00

Rate ComparisonRESIDENTIAL NON‐RESIDENTIAL

SFR MFR

100000 SQ.FT.

MANUFACTURING

30,000 GENERAL OFFICE

BUILDING

20,000 SPECIALTY RETAIL

100,000 SUPER MARKET

10,000 DRIVE IN BANK

5000 FAST FOOD

RESTAURANT W/DTSFR MFR URING BUILDING RETAIL MARKET BANK W/DT

Average $ 7.41 $ 6.22 $ 386.01 $ 193.57 $ 318.38 $ 1,801.26 $ 344.21 $ 278.03

High $ 11.56 $ 8.12 $ 640.00 $ 330.90 $ 557.65 $ 3,758.19 $ 801.85 $ 499.91

Low $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00

Hillsboro scenarios for new rates

Current $ 3.18 $ 2.87 $ 21.00 $ 14.70 $ 32.60 $ 364.00 $ 95.80 $ 97.10

Scenario A $ 5.00 $ 4.50 $ 22.00 $ 15.60 $ 34.60 $ 386.00 $ 101.50 $ 102.95

Scenario B $ 4 86 $ 4 18 $ 24 00 $ 16 80 $ 38 80 $ 414 00 $ 108 80 $ 120 95Scenario B $ 4.86 $ 4.18 $ 24.00 $ 16.80 $ 38.80 $ 414.00 $ 108.80 $ 120.95

Scenario B1 $ 5.24 $ 4.72 $ 27.00 $ 19.20 $ 45.00 $ 476.00 $ 125.20 $ 141.55

Hillsboro scenarios for new rates in Year Three (2017/2018)

Current $ 3.18 $ 2.87 $ 21.00 $ 14.70 $ 2.60 $ 364.00 $ 95.80 $ 97.10

Scenario A (2017/2018) $ 5.61 $ 5.05 $ 25.00 $ 17.40 $ 38.80 $ 434.00 $ 114.10 $ 115.65

Scenario B (2017/2018) $ 7.56 $ 6.81 $ 29.00 $ 21.00 $ 51.00 $ 513.00 $ 134.60 $ 168.60

Scenario B1 (2017/2018) $ 9.36 $ 8.42 $ 39.00 $ 28.50 $ 69.60 $ 701.00 $ 184.00 $ 230.40


Discussion

• Discuss proposed modification and potentialDiscuss proposed modification and potential increases to the customer rate structure.


Next Steps

• December 17th – Transportation CommitteeC id k h ld f db k– Consider stakeholder feedback

– Recommend any changes be forwarded to Council

• January 6th ‐ City Council (tentative)– Set Public Hearing on any proposed changes

• February 3rd – City Council (tentative )Public Hearing– Public Hearing

• February to April‐ Outreach on changes (tentative)

• April 1st – Implement Changes (tentative)


transportation utility fee (tuf)...

Documents