transmittance of near infrared energy by binary glassesgerlovin. glasses 7 and 8 contain more lead...

4
- U. S. Departme nt of Commer ce National Bureau of Standards Re sear ch Paper RP1945 Volume 41, December 1948 Part of the Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Transmittance of Near Infrared Energy by Binary Glasses 1 2 By Jack M. Florence, Francis W. Glaze, Clarence H. Hahne r, and Ralph Stair A study has been made of the transmittance of near infrared energy by a number of binary glasses. Of the systems studied, the lithia-silica and lead oxide-silica were found to have the highe st transmittance of cnergy ill the range of wave l engths from 3.0 to 5.0 micron s. Thc ' t r allsmittance of lithia-silica is compared with that of 1.he other alkali-silica glasses. Va lues of tr ansmittance are given for lead silicate glasses of highcr lead eontellt than have been previou sly r eported in the literature. 1. Introduction Publish ed d ata concerning the rel ation between the transm ittance of infrared energy and the com- position of glasses have been limited to a rel atively . few investigations. A compil ation of these inves- tigations is given by Eitel, Pirani, and Scheel [IP in Glastechnische Tabellen, which was published in 1932. Since th at date, GCll ovin [2] has pub lished a s tu dy of borate, sili caLe, and phosphate glasses; a study of glasses incorporaLing rare eal th and other oxides h as been published by SLair a nd F aick [3]. The majority of these studies arc concerned with the absorption b ands of compl ex glasses. I n th is paper only data on experimenLal b inary glasses are considered. II . Preparation of the Glasses Th e glasses th at were made for this work were melted in pl atinum ' cru ci bles of 150- to 300-g capacity. The b atch materials used were of the highest co mmercial puri ty as used in the maJmfac- t ur e of op tical glass, and no special processes were used to purify the materials before usc. The only h eavy metal th at was present as an impur ity in sufficient quantities to have any possible eff ect on Lhe tr ansmittance was iron. Th e following quan- 1 Made possible by a transfer of funds from the Department of the Navy. Bureau of Ships, to the National Bureau of Standards. 'This paper will also appear in the December issne of the Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 3 Figures in brackets indicate tbe literature references at tbe cod of this paper. Transmittance of Binary Glasses 811266-49-6 Lities as Fe20 3 were present in Lhe baLch maLel'ials used: Powdered silica (SiOz) _________ _ 0.018 percent. Li zC O a _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Trace. NazCOa__ ______ ______ Less than 0.001 percent. K Z C0 3 __ _______ _ _______ __ _ Do. Litharge (PbO) ______________ 0.001 percent. The glasses were melted and fined in a platinum resistance furnace in about 6 hI' and then p oured into a mold to form a sample ab out in. thiclc The samples were of a quality equivalent to that of optical glass. Samples were prepared for measurement by grinding and polishing into plates having plane parallel faces 1 in. square. III. Composition of th e Glasses :Measurements were made on glasses of lithium silicate, sodium silicate, potassium silicate, and l ead silicate. The lithium silicate glass had a composition close to that of lithium metasilicate (Li 20 .2Si02). Compositions appreciably differ- ent from this ratio could not be cooled without devitrification [4]. The sodium silicate glasses contained 21.28, 24.79, and 31.02 mole percent of N a 20. The potassium silicate glass contained 20 .35 mole percent of K 20. These glasses, listed in table 1, are within such ranges of compositions that comp arisons may be made by moleTpercentage and , weigh t-percentage compositions. within 3 percent. A stable K 20 -Si0 2 glass of 32.41 mole per cent of K 20 could not be made for direct co mp arison with the Li 20 glass. Th e l ead sili cate 623

Upload: others

Post on 23-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • -U. S. Department of Commerce National Bureau of Standards

    Research Paper RP1945 Volume 41, December 1948

    Part of the Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards

    Transmittance of Near Infrared Energy by Binary Glasses 1 2

    By Jack M. Florence, Francis W. Glaze, Clarence H. Hahner, and Ralph Stair

    A study has been made of the transmittance of near infrared energy by a number of

    binary glasses. Of the systems studied, the lithia-silica and lead oxide-silica were found to

    have the highest transmittance of cnergy ill the range of wavelengths from 3.0 to 5.0 microns.

    Thc' t rallsmittance of lithia-silica is compared with that of 1.he other alkali-silica glasses.

    Values of t ransmittance are given for lead silicate glasses of highcr lead eontellt than have

    been previously reported in the literature.

    1. Introduction

    P ublished data concerning the relation between the transmittance of infrared energy and the com-position of glasses have been limited to a relatively . few investigations. A compilation of these inves-tigations is given by Eitel, Pirani, and Scheel [IP in Glastechnische Tabellen, which was published in 1932. Since that date, GCll ovin [2] has published a s tudy of borate, silicaLe, and phosphate glasses; a study of glasses incorporaLing rare ealth and other oxides h as been published by SLair and F aick [3]. The majority of these studies a rc concerned with the absorption bands of complex glasses. I n th is paper only data on experimenLal binary glasses are considered.

    II. Preparation of the Glasses

    The glasses that were made for this work were mel ted in platinum ' crucibles of 150- to 300-g capacity. The batch materials used were of the highest commercial puri ty as used in the maJmfac-ture of op tical glass, and no special processes were used to purify the materials before usc. The only heavy metal that was presen t as an impurity in sufficient quantities to have any possible effect on Lhe transmittance was iron. The following quan-

    1 Made possible by a transfer of funds from the Department of the Navy. Bureau of Ships, to the National Bureau of Standards.

    'This paper will also appear in the December issne of the Journal of the American Ceramic Society.

    3 Figures in brackets indicate tbe literature references at tbe cod of this paper .

    Transmittance of Binary Glasses 811266-49-6

    Lities as Fe20 3 were present in Lhe baLch maLel'ials used: Powdered silica (SiOz) _________ _ 0.018 percent. LizCOa _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Trace. NazCOa__ ______ ______ Less than 0.001 percent. KZC0 3 __ _______ _ _______ __ _ Do. Litharge (PbO) ______________ 0.001 percent.

    The glasses were melted and fined in a platinum resistance furnace in about 6 hI' and then poured into a mold to form a sample about }~ in. thiclc The samples were of a quality equivalent to that of optical glass. Samples were prepared for measurement by grinding and polishing into plates having plane parallel faces 1 in. square.

    III. Composition of the Glasses

    :Measurements were made on glasses of lithium silicate, sodium silicate, potassium silicate, and lead silicate. The lithium silicate glass had a composition close to that of lithium metasilicate (Li20 .2Si02). Compositions appreciably differ-ent from this ratio could not be cooled without devitrification [4]. The sodium silicate glasses contained 21.28, 24.79, and 31.02 mole percent of N a20 . The potassium silicate glass contained 20 .35 mole percent of K20 . These glasses, listed in table 1, are within such ranges of compositions that comparisons may be made by moleTpercentage and , weigh t-percentage compositions . within 3 percent. A stable K 20 -Si0 2 glass of 32.41 mole percent of K 20 could not be made for direct comparison with the Li20 glass . The lead silicate

    623

  • glasses made contained 70 .86, 79 .91 , and 88.08 weigh t percent of PbO. Potassium and lead silicate [5] glasses . beyond th ese ranges, either could no t b e melted and cooled without difficulty

    ...... or were not sufficielltly resis tant to moisture so tha t a polished sample could be made for trans-mission measurements. The compositions of th ese glasses, by chemical analysis, are given in table 1.

    TABLE 1. Glass compositi ons

    I Na,O I K ,O I PbO I F e,0 3 I -------------------------Glass N o. Li,O SiO,

    ----------------------_.-,----

    L _____________________ _ 2 ______________________ _ 3. ______________________ _ 4 .. ____ ___ _

    5 _____ _____ __ __ ________ _

    Weioht percent

    80. 72 78.01 74. 60 G8. 29 71. 37

    Mole percent

    67. 58 78.71 75.21 68. 97 79. 64

    6_____________ _______ __ __ 29. 13 60. 44 7_____________ _________ _ 20. 08 48.28 8___________ __________ ___ 11. 91 33. 44

    Weight 1Jercent

    1R 26

    M ole 1JCrcent

    32.41

    IV. Near Infrared Transmittances

    Jilei"ht percent

    21. 97 25. 38 31. 70

    The infrared spectra of glasses have wid e r egions of absorption and transparen cy . The

    - transmi.ttance for glasses of the same b at ch com-position will vary with the .thiclmess of the sample and t he presence in th e glass of small amounts of impurities, among which are Iron and nick el oxides and water vapor [6] .

    The sp ectral transmissions wcr e determined radiometrically by m eans of a fluori te prism mir ror spectrometer , N ernst glower, and a vacuum thermopile. A detailed descrip tion of th e method is given in previous publications [7 , 8, g, 10, 11 , and 12] . These data are given in figures 1 to 5 without correc tion for reflectance.

    The simplest glass from th e st andpoint of chemical composition , though not case of prepara-t ion, is fused silica. The transmission curve for transpar en t tused silica (fig . 1) indicates a high transmittance t o about 3.5M. The ' absorp tion band a t 2.8M is ch aracteristic of silicate glasses, but i t is a minimum in fused silica . Two addi-tional absorption b and s ar c present at th e wave-len gths of 3 .7 and 4.45M. The thiclmess of th e sample was 2.85 mm.

    1. Transmittances of the Alkali-Silica Glasses

    The t ransmittances of a r epresen tative li th ium silica te glass 1 ar e shown in figure 2 for a sample 5.74 mm thick. This thickness of sample gives a good contrast for the range of wavelengths from 3. 0 to · 5. 0 M. In figure 3 the t ransmission

    624

    lvI ole percent

    21. 28 24.79 31. 02

    100

    90

    80

    r 70 z w u 5 60 a. w ~ 50 f'! r

    ~ 40 z

    20

    10

    o o

    lVeioht percent

    28. 61

    1.0

    ],,(o/e Weioht M ole Weioht lv(ol. percent percent IJercent percent percent

    O. 017 O. 005 . 01 5 . 006 .01 5 .006 . 014 . 006

    20.3.\ . 016 . 007

    70 86 3D. 55 . 009 . 01 79. Dl 51. 70 . 008 . 01 88. 08 GG. 54 . 007 . 02

    I

    \( ~ \ - \ \

    ~

    1\ \

    \ h \

    2.0 3.0 4 .0 5.0 WAVELENGTH, MICRONS'

    F IGURE 1. Transmittance of infra'red energy by fu sed silica.

    Thickness of sam ple= 2.85 m m.

    curves of the sodium silicate glasses 2, 3, and 4 ' a.r e shown. The h igh es t tran smit tance is shown by glass 3, which is n ear the composition of Lhe eu tee tic r eported by Kracek [13] for the N a20-Si02 sys tem. A comparison of th e transmit tance of th e liLhium silica te glass 1 with tha t of th e sodium silicate glasses 2, 3, and 4, shows that the lithium silicate glass has a higher transmittan ce of infrared energy than any of the sodium silicate glasses. The potassium silicate glass .5 is similar

    Journal of Research

  • - cps

    100

    90

    80

    I- 70 z w u ffi 60 11.

    W U Z 50 ~ !::: ~ 4 0 Z « a:: I- 30

    20

    10

    o o

    ... ---r ~

    1.0

    I

    ..... 1-1

    , \ k " ~ 1'\

    \ 2.0 3 .0 4 .0 5.0

    WAVELENGTH, MICRONS

    I-z

    70

    60

    ~ 50 a:: w 11.

    tJ 40 Z

    i:! !::: 30 ::< (/)

    Z

    ~ 20 I-

    10

    o

    \ \t I'---

    o 1.0

    r--.. ~~ ,

    \

    "I--... ~ 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

    WAVELnlGTH , MI CRONS

    FlC URJ, 4. T ransmittance of infrared energy by potassium silicate glass.

    Thickness of glass 5= 4.45111111 .

    100

    .. ~

    FTflUlm 2. Transmillance of infrared energiJ li y (/ lithi 'u?n 90

    100

    90

    80

    I- 70 Z w u ffi 60 11.

    W

    ~ 50 ~ I-

    ~ 40 z « a:: I- 30

    20

    10

    o

    f--

    o

    silicate e:Lpcrimental gla ss.

    rr h ickness or glas~ 1= 5.74 m ll1.

    .rd>

  • r The experimental glasses prepared for our work

    contained 70.86 to 88.08 percent by weight of lead oxide. The transmittance curve for glass 6 shown, in figure 5, is similar to that published by Gerlovin. Glasses 7 and 8 contain more lead oxide than any glass reported by Gerlovin. It is evident that increasing the lead oxide content above 70.86 percent decreases the percentage of transmittance up to the 2.8-1" absorption band, but increases the transmittance for wavelengths from 3.25 to about 5.0 1".

    V. Summary

    T he transmittance of infrared energy by lithium, sodium, potassium, and lead silicate glasses has been measured for wavelengths of 0.7 to 5 1". It was found t hat glasses containing lithia-silica gave a greater transmittance of infrared energy than the glasses of either soda-silica or potash-silica systems.

    Increasing the percentage of lead oxide in a lead silicate glass does not increase the transmit-tance of infrared energy for all wavelengths.

    A glass of the composition 71 percent of PbO, 29 percent of Si02, will gi ve the maximum trans-mittance of infrared energy in the range of wave-lengths from 0.8 to about 2.7 J1..

    Increasing the quantity of lead oxide above 71

    626

    percent increases the transmittance of infrared energy in the range of wavelengths from 3.25 to about 5.0 1", but lowers the transmittance in the range from 0.8 to 2.7 1".

    The authors thank Mrs. Helen Pool and J. J . Diamond for their cooperation in making the measurements of transmittances and tbe chemical analyses, respectively.

    VI. References

    [1] W. Eitel, M. Pirani, and K. Scheel, Glastechnische tabellen (29 Ultrarotdurchliiss, Springer, Berlin, 1932).

    [2] J. 1. Gerlovin, Acad. Sci. URSS 38, 5 to 6, 170 (1943). [3] R. Stair and C. A. Faick, J. Research NBS 38, 95

    (1947) RP1761. [4] F. C. Kracek, J. Phys. Chern. 34, 264 (1930). [5] Roo F. Geller, A. S. Creamer, and E. N. Bunting, J.

    Research NBS 13, 237 (1934) RP705. [6] A . .T. Harrison , J. Am. Cerarn. Soc. 30, 362 (1947). [7] R. Stair and W. W. Coblentz , BS J. Research 11,

    703 (1933) RP617. [8] W. W. Coblentz, BS Bul. 10, 1 (1913) S204. [9] W. W. Coblentz, BS Bul. 13, 423 (1916) S282.

    [10] W. W. Coblentz, BS Sci. Pap. 17, 187 (1921) S413. [11] W. W. Coblentz, BS Sci. Pap. 17, 187 (1921) S413. [12] R. Stair and W. W. Coblentz, J. Research NBS 10,

    295 (1935) RP830. [13] F. C. Kracek, J. Phys. Chern. 34, 1583 (1930).

    WASHlNG'rmr, August ]6, 1948.

    Journal of Research

    jresv41n6p_623jresv41n6p_624jresv41n6p_625jresv41n6p_626