transfer of property case

10
R.Kempraj v. Messrs Barton Son & Co. By, MOHAMMED HAROON RASHEED B.A.LL.B (Hons.), [BSW] & [LLM] Advocate Email ID: [email protected] 1 (c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE

Upload: mohammed-haroon

Post on 21-Mar-2017

219 views

Category:

Law


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Transfer of property case

1

R.Kempraj v. Messrs Barton Son & Co.

By,MOHAMMED HAROON RASHEEDB.A.LL.B (Hons.), [BSW] & [LLM]

AdvocateEmail ID: [email protected]

(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE

Page 2: Transfer of property case

2

1962 (2) Supreme Court Cases 594.

(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE

Page 3: Transfer of property case

3

FACTS:•On October 26, 1951, Respondent entered

into a deed of Lease. (para 2)

•Respect to a premises located at M.G Road, Bangalore. (para 2)

•“with an option to the lessee to renew the same as long as desired as provided”.

(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE

Page 4: Transfer of property case

4

ISSUE:

•Whether an option given to a lessee to get the lease, which is initially for a period of ten years, renewed after every ten years is hit by the rule of perpetuity and is void?

(para 1)

(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE

Page 5: Transfer of property case

5

LAW:• Clause 9 of the lease deed.(para 2)

• Clause 10 of the lease deed. (para 2)

• Section 14 – Rule Against Perpetuity. (para 4 def.)

• Section 40- Restriction on use of land (para 8).(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE

Page 6: Transfer of property case

6

ANALYSIS OF THE LAW:•Clause 9 of the lease deed:

•“The lessee shall have the right to renew the lease of the scheduled premises at the end of the present period of ten years here in secured on the same rental of Rs. 450/- per month, for a similar period and for further similar periods thereafter on the same terms and conditions as are set forth herein ; and the lease shall be permitted and shall have right to remain in occupation of the premises on the same terms and conditions for any further periods of ten years as long as they desired to do so.” (para 2)

•Clause 10 of the lease deed:•“The lesser shall not raise any objections whatsoever to the lease exercising his option to renew the lease for any further period of ten years on the same terms and conditions as long as they desire to be in occupation, provided the lease shall not have a right to transfer the lease or alienate right there under.” (para2)(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED,

ADVOCATE

Page 7: Transfer of property case

7

• Section 14 – Rule Against Perpetuity.(para 5 and 6)

The Object of this rule is to ensure free and active circulation of property both for purposes of trade and commerce as well as for the betterment of the property itself. (vested interest)

• Section 40- Restriction on use of land.

• (para 8)

(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE

Page 8: Transfer of property case

8

•The Rule of Perpetuity applies in case of Vested Interest where here it is the case of contingent interest held by respondent where he is not the owner but he is lessee who pays the lease and also has right to renew his lease after period of every 10 years. (para 5 and 6)Vested Interest : - Interest created in favor of the transferee upon the

transfer of a property.

Contingent Interest : - Interest which gets vested upon the happening or not happening of an uncertain specific event.(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED,

ADVOCATE

Page 9: Transfer of property case

9

CONCLUSION (Judgment):• The Rule against perpetuity contained in section 14

of the Transfer Of Property Act 1882 would not be applicable as no interest in property has been created of the nature contemplated by that provision.

• The appeal fails and it is to be dismissed with costs.

(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE

Page 10: Transfer of property case

10

Thank you…

MD(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE