toxo comparative sensitivit 10=10

Upload: mohammed-sarhan

Post on 04-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    1/31

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    2/31

    Comparative Sensitivity of Fluorescence Resonance

    Energy Transfer Quantitative PCR and

    Conventional Nested PCR in detection of

    Toxoplasma parasiteAmany A Abd El-Aal, Enas Zakaria, Nehal A Hanf,

    Asmaa A Abd El-Aal

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    3/31

    Amany Ahmed Abd El-AalProfessor of Parasitology

    Faculty of Medicine , cairo University

    Presented by:

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    4/31

    Introduction

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    5/31

    Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is a common cause ofinfection in many warm-blooded animals, including

    humans. Between 15 and 85% of the world adult

    human population is chronically infected with T.

    gondii depending on geographical location.

    Introduction

    Most cases of human infection are mild, but

    devastating disease can occur in immune-

    compromized individuals and congenitally infected

    fetuses that may lead to serious complications. Early

    diagnosis is crucial to start treatment that drastically

    reduces the extent of the damage.

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    6/31

    Serological diagnosis of active infection is unreliable because

    reactivation of hidden infection is not always accompanied by

    changes in antibody levels, and evolution of a latent or dormant

    toxoplasmosis is highly unpredictable. Moreover, the presence ofIgM does not necessarily indicate recent infection.

    Introduction

    Application of PCR has evolved as a sensitive, specific, and rapid

    method for the detection of T. gondii DNA in different samples,

    accordingly serving confirmation of active infection.

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    7/31

    There is a wide variety of protocols used by different Research

    laboratories that employ the three-stages conventional PCR

    procedure (extraction,amplification and detection). In addition to

    a 4th stage in case of semi-quantitative analysis of the specific

    genome using gel documentation system and markers with known

    molecular weight size .

    Introduction

    On the other hand, accelerating the molecular diagnosis of

    toxoplasmosis by performing real-time PCR protocols has been

    reported. This technique allows amplification and simultaneous

    detection of DNA in 1 h.Unlike many bacterial and viral infections there is no available

    IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic) molecular technique for parasitic

    infection.

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    8/31

    Introduction

    According to the method by which the primers and probes

    hybridize to the target gene, there are different qPCR protocols as

    TaqMan probes, Molecular Beacons and fluorescence resonance

    energy transfer (FRET) probes.

    Concerning qPCR, fluorescently labeled specific probes was

    reported as a highly sensitive and specific method of detection,

    as only the desired PCR product is detected.

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    9/31

    AimThis work aimed to evaluate sensitivity of 2 different PCR

    protocols in detection ofToxoplasma parasite, conventional nested

    PCR and Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) real

    time PCR.

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    10/31

    Methodology

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    11/31

    The target DNA of the cloned sample

    (Roche Diagnostics) was provided in 6

    different quantities to yield from 10copies to 106 copies ofToxoplasma target

    molecules once eluted in 5 l PCR-

    grade water . Reaction mixture was

    added to each sample and was then

    mixed by pipetting the solution up anddown 10 times.

    Methodology

    Toxoplasma samples

    T. gondii (P-strain) tachyzoites werecollected by peritoneal lavage of infected

    mice. The number of tachyzoites in

    suspension was determined by counting

    on a haemocytometer prior to DNA

    extraction.

    Cloned Toxoplasma DNA samples Toxoplasmagondii tachyzoites

    Negative control: By replacing the template DNA with water.

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    12/31

    DNA was extracted from Toxoplasma

    tachyzoites using fully automated

    MagnaPure Compact Instrument . Final

    pellets were suspended in 30L of TE buffer

    and stored

    at 70C until used.

    DNA extractionMethodology

    The amount of parasite genome (tachyzoite

    equivalents) was determined by

    spectrophotometer (one parasite ~ 0.1 pg of

    DNA). Accordingly different dilutions were

    prepared

    Perform 116 nucleic acid purifications from the sample in 15-40 minutes

    The system is highly flexible concerning the sample and elution volume needed

    to obtain the necessary nucleic acid concentrations for application.

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    13/31

    Nested Polymerase chain reaction:

    Methodology

    The fully automated thermo-

    cycler (Q cycler Quanta

    Biotech).

    Nested primer sets targeted B1

    gene were;

    The outer bases were from171 to

    190 and from bases 602 to 583

    producing an amplified product of

    432 bp.

    Inner primers were from bases 180 to 196 and from bases 392 to

    372 producing an amplified product of 213 bp.

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    14/31

    The amplification products weredetected by gel electrophoresis

    using 3% agarose gel in 1 tris-

    borate-EDTA buffer.

    DNA bands were visualized using

    0.5% ethidium bromide in thepresence of ultraviolet light.

    Methodology

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    15/31

    PCR, targeting T. gondii 134 bp

    repeated region (more than 200-

    fold) was amplified with specific

    primers and Fast-StartDNA

    MasterPLUS Hybridization

    Probes Kit. The resulting PCR

    fragment ofT. gondii was analyzed

    with a probe labeled withLightCyclerRed 640 (detected in

    channel 640).

    Methodology

    QuantitativeFRET-PCR(Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer)

    protocol:

    The LightCycler Real-Time PCR

    System with its screen showing the

    soft war

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    16/31

    In this technique, two labeled oligonucleotide probes that bind to

    the PCR product in a head-to-tail fashion

    When the two probes bind, their

    fluorophores come into close,

    allowing Energy Transfer froma donor to an acceptor

    fluorophore.

    Therefore, fluorescence is

    detected during the annealingphase of PCR and is proportional

    to the amount of PCR product.

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    17/31

    Prior to the performance, a standard curve was automatically

    drown, using known samples with known genomic quantities to

    facilitate estimation of genomic quantites of the unknown

    samples.

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    18/31

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    19/31

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    20/31

    Optimization of qPCR was done to avoid non specific

    reactions (primer dimmer ).

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    21/31

    Results

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    22/31

    Real-time PCR detected the same amount of DNA extracted from

    different dilutions of Toxoplasma tachyzoites as the conventional

    PCR. The amount of DNA equivalent to one tachyzoite wassystematically detected by both methods.

    Results

    Using the cloned Toxoplasma DNA, all concentrations from 101 to

    10 6 were detected by qPCR, while nPCR failed to detect the

    lowest concentration (101).

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    23/31

    Nested PCR was sensitive to detect102 copies while FRET assay

    showed a sensitivity of 101 copy.

    Results

    Crossing points (Cps) showed different values ranging from 39.68

    to 12.88 reflecting the different DNA quantities (from 1.7x 101 to9x 1010) .

    Quantitative genomic estimation of these positive samples inqPCR was ranging from 1.7x 101 to 9x 1010.

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    24/31

    In addition of acurate Quantitative genomic estimation of these positive

    samples, qPCR technique can simultaneously identify genotype of the

    target genome using reference strain

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    25/31

    1

    2-5

    6

    Positive samples in relation to the negative control . First signal at

    cycle number 13 followed by 5 signals starting from cycle 17 to

    22 . The last signal is a weak one at cycle 30.

    Amplification product becomes detectable

    within the baseline setting of cycles 13 to cycle 30

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    26/31

    Results

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    27/31

    Conclusions

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    28/31

    Conclusion

    The main advantages of Real-time PCR

    over nested-PCR assays as follow; (i) it isfar less labor-intensive (only one PCR step,

    compared to at least two in nested-PCR);

    (ii) qPCR is performed in a closed systemwhere post-PCR handling is not required

    (i.e., transfer of amplified template from the

    primary to the secondary amplification

    reaction and agarose gel electrophoresis for

    the detection of PCR products; thisconstitutes a major advantage since the risks

    of contamination are minimal);

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    29/31

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    30/31

    As for all parasitic diseases, the PCR diagnosis of toxoplasmosis isnot standardized. Due to the previously mentioned advantages of qPCR

    over conventional PCR, It seems highly probable that there will be an

    agreement on Real-time PCR assays in the next few years. However, the

    agreement on the best sequence to be amplified will be more difficult.

    Conclusion

    For a possible application of Real-time PCRs in routine diagnosis,

    protocols should be optimized and carefully evaluated in a larger

    number of clinical samples before they are implemented as routinediagnostic method for toxoplasmosis.

  • 7/31/2019 Toxo Comparative Sensitivit 10=10

    31/31

    Thanks