‘towards’ using grazing markers to determine grazing intake

26
‘Towards’ using grazing markers to determine grazing intake Ron Lewis Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences 2013 “Brown Bagger” Webinar Series October 30, 2013

Upload: wylie

Post on 23-Feb-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

‘Towards’ using grazing markers to determine grazing intake. Ron Lewis Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences. 2013 “Brown Bagger” Webinar Series October 30, 2013. Cow efficiency. An efficient cow herd has: high reproductive rates early sexual maturity longevity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

‘Towards’ using grazing markers to determine grazing intake

Ron LewisDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences

2013 “Brown Bagger” Webinar SeriesOctober 30, 2013

Page 2: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Cow efficiency

An efficient cow herd has: high reproductive rates early sexual maturity longevity minimum maintenance requirements ability to convert available energy from

forage into calf weaning weight

(Dickerson, 1970)

Page 3: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Maintenance costs

~ 65% total beef production costs due to feed

~ 70% total energy consumed by cow-calf sector

~ 75% cow’s total annual energy requirement for maintenancevaries appreciably

(Ferrell and Jenkins, 1985)

Page 4: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Challenge

Page 5: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Plant-wax markersMeasurementPrediction

Our processValidationAdditional markersExtension to pasture

Summing up

Today’s talk

Page 6: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Plant cuticular wax

Wax on external surface of plantsComplex mixture with chemical

composition that differs appreciably among plant species

n-alkanes (hydrocarbons)Over 90% have odd-numbers of

carbons (C29, C31 and C33 predominant)Relatively inert and ‘easy’ to assess

(Dove and Mayes, 2005)

Page 7: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Measurement

PlantAssess n-alkane profiles of plants

Animal (fecal sample)Diet composition

Assess n-alkane profile of fecal sampleFeed intake (and whole-diet digestibility)

In addition, dose with even-chain n-alkane (C32)

Page 8: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Prediction

Diet compositionMatch n-alkane concentrations in feces

with combinations of plant profiles Feed intake (I )

𝐼=Dose   rate 𝑗

( 𝐹 𝑗×𝑅 𝑖

𝐹 𝑖×𝑅 𝑗 )× (𝐻 𝑖−herbage   content 𝑗 )

𝑖−odd −chain   n −alkane𝑗−odd−chain  n−alkane

Page 9: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Our process

Validation (n-alkanes)Characterize plantsPredict diet composition

Additional markers Extension to pasture

Fecal samplingDosing

Page 10: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Characterize plants (simple mixture)

C27 C29 C31 C330

100

200

300

400Red cloverFescue

mg/

kg D

M

n-alkanes LCOH

Page 11: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Characterize plants (simple mixture)

Page 12: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Characterize plants (simple mixture)

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0Test diet composition: fescue proportion

ABC

Actual proportion (kg/kg)

Pre

dict

ed p

ropo

rtion

(kg/

kg)

𝑦=𝑥

Page 13: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.70.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8Cattle diet composition: red clover

Estimated proportion (kg/kg)

Obs

erve

d pr

opor

tion

(kg/

kg)

Predictions (simple mixture)

𝑦=𝑥

Page 14: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Forb Curly dock Dandelion Lambsquarter

Forage Alfalfa Clover

Red White

Fescue Orchard grass Smooth brome

Characterize plants (complex mixture)

Page 15: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Characterize plants (complex mixture)

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

PC1

PC

2

C27, C29

C31

C33

White clover

Alfalfa

Red clover

Fescue

Orchard grass

Smooth brome

Curly dock

Dandelion

Lambsquarter

Page 16: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Prediction (complex mixture)

Avg.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%Cattle diet composition: mixed plants

White CloverRed CloverAlfalfaFescueSmooth bromeOrchard Grass

Animal

Per

cent

of d

iet

Page 17: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Additional markers

Long-chain fatty acids Even-numbers of carbons C20 – C32 exclusive to plants with high

fecal recoveries Long-chain alcohols (LCOH)

Primarily even-number of carbons with high fecal recoveries

Wide variation in patterns across plants(Dove and Mayes, 2005)

Page 18: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Characterize plants (simple mixture)

C27 C29 C31 C33 C26-OH

C28-OH

C30-OH

0

100

200

300

400

500Red cloverFescue

mg/

kg D

M

n-alkanesLCOH(Vargas Jurado, 2012)

Page 19: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Characterize plants (simple mixture)

Page 20: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Extension to pasture: dosing

Page 21: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Extension to pasture: sampling

Need to link fecal sample to an animal

Day 2

Day 3

Page 22: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Extension to pasture: sampling

Page 23: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Summing up

Understanding cow efficiency would benefit from measures of diet composition and intake at pasture

Plant-wax markers, with refinements, offers opportunities to achieve that aim

Page 24: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Summing up

If scalable, such information may contribute topasture management systemsanimal selection decisions

Page 25: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Summing up

National sire (bull) testing program Progeny tests within feedlot and pasture-

based systems Evaluate ‘sensitivities’ in feed efficiency

relative to production system

Page 26: ‘Towards’ using  grazing markers to determine  grazing  intake

Thanks for listening

Faculty/Staff Sarah Blevins David Fiske Harold McNair Terry Swecker Amy Tanner

The Hutton Institute Bob Mayes

Graduate student Napo Vargas Jurado

Undergraduate students Amy Brandon Patricia Helsel Annie Laib Jaime Rutter

USMARC Harvey Freetly Heidi Hillhouse John Keele Larry Kuehn Sam Nejezchleb

Virginia Tech