M M H W H T I M M THE FHSBICAL M M M I M PROGRAM M

• ARUXOKOB STATE COUSAS WITH RSCOMMSHDAIIGHS

TOR mmm Dmnwmwt

AFFROTBPT

M M M W ' V-

^ , 1

i«tiAirlift iil/1 i}(mAAtirli J, Kmw wmfmmm

^ ./ , .. Y^rm^pr A

' W"IFTS DTPIIKVTMML'J

OF FKQRTIEFTL B&UE&TION

@ F E L S W ^ 3 W H W ' 1 5 K © R

AN SVAKJATION OF THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION PROGRAM OF

ARLINGTON STATS COLLEGE WITH RSCOMMEHDATIONS

FOE FOTURB DEVELOPMENT

THESIS

Presented to the Graduate Council ©f the

North Texas Stat® College in Partial

Fulfillawnt of the acquirements

For the Degree of

MASTER OF SCIENCE

xiy

Burley Bearden, B. S#

Arlington, Texas

August, 1954

TABLE OF CONTESTS

Page

LIST OF TABLE3 . ir

use OP ILHJSTRlf ICMS . . . . . . . . . . r M

Chapter I» 1ST RODUCT ION 1

Statement of the Problem • • Definition of Terms Purposes ©f the Study limitations of the Study Sources of Data Procedure Organization

XI A BRIEF HISTORICAL DESCRIPTION OF ARLINGTON STATE COLLEGE. . . . . . . 5

III. PROBLEMS M D GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE PHYSICAL SDUCATIGI DEPARTMENT. . . . . 13

Changes in Enrollment and Effect on Athletics and Physical Education

Professional Courses in Physical Education History of Boy's Physical Education History of Girl's Physical Education History of Intramural Athletics History of Intercollegiate Athletics

If. AS EVALUATION OF THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . 383

Organisation and Administration Required Physical Education Intramural Athletics Intercollegiate Athletics

V. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. . 77

Summary Conclusions

Recommendations for Future Development

BIBLIOGRAPHY. 8B

4 4 4

M m m TABLES

Table f&m

- U Personnel, M#n»s Physical Education, 2.91*?•19S® * • # • « » « * * • • • *

E. Personnel, Wmm*s Physical Education, 191?«1959 . , . •

3. Standards for the Organization and Staff of » College Physical Education Program and the Extent to Vbleh the • Physical Education Program* the Physical sanation

. Department t and tit© !,G,f*C» Department of Arlington State College Meet the Standards . . . . 36

4. Standards for the Instruction of a College Physical .education Program and the Extent to fetch the Physical Education Program, the Physical Education Department, and the R»0*T*C. Department of Arlington State College Meet the Standards 39

5. Standard# for Attendance of a College Physical Education Program and the Extent to Which the Physical Education Program, the Physical Education Department, and the fUG.T*C.. Department of Arlington State College Meet the Standards « . * . 40

6. Standards for Attendance fbr a College Physical Education Program and the Extent to Which the Physical Education Program, the Physical Education Department, and the R»0»T »C. Department of Arlington, Stat® College Meet the Standards « • • • « • 48

7. Standards for Restrictive and Corrective Physical Education in a College Physical Education Program and the Extent to Which the Physical Education Program, the Physi-cal Education Department, and the R.O.T.C. Department of Arlington State College Meet the Standards * • *5

Table B. Standards for Facilities and Equipment

for a College Physical Education Pro-gram and the Extant to Which the Physi-cal Education Program, the Physical Education. Department, and the R.G.T.C. Department of Arlington State College Meet the Standards 4?

9, Standards for Sanitation of Gymnasium in a College Physical Education Program and the Ixtent to Which the Physical Education Programthe Physical Education Department, and the R.G.T.C. Department of Arlington State College Meet the Standards • 51

10» Standards for Organization and Staff of a College Intramural Athletic Program and the Extent to Which the Physical Education Program* the Physical Education Department, and the R*G.T.C«. Department of Arlington Stat® College Meet the Standards 54

11. Standards for Facilities and Equipment of a College Intramural Athletic Program and the Extent to Which the Physical Education Program, the Physical Educa-tion Department, and the H.O.T.C. Depart-ment of Arlington State College Meet the Standards 55

• IS, Standards for a Program of Activities in a College Intramural Athletics Program and the Extent to Which the Physical Education Program, the Physical Education Department, and the R.O.fX. Department of Arlington State College Meet the Standards • « * * 5®

IS. Standards for Schedules for a College Intra-mural Athletics program and the Extent to Which the Physical Idueation Program, the Physical idueation Department, and the

- l.O.T.C. Department of Arlington State College Meet the Standards • 58

14. standards for Protests in a College Intra-mural Athletics Program and the Extent to Which the Physical Education Program, the Physical Education Department, and the H.0.7.C* Department or Arlington State College Meet the Standards 59

fable Page 15. Standards for Organization and Staff for

Intercollegiate Athletics and the Extent to Which the Physical Education Program, the Physical Education Department, and the R.O,T.C. Department of Arlington State College Meet the Standards m

16# Standards for Equipment for Intercollegiate Athletics and the Extent to Which the Physical Education Program, the Physical Education Department, and the R.O.T.C. Department of Arlington State College Meet the Stfindards » « » • « . * . , 64

1? • Standard# for Accounting for Intercollegiate Athletics and the Extent to Which the Physical Sducation Program, the Physical Education Department, and the R»0*T»C* Department of Arlington State College Meet the Standards . . 6$

18. Standards for Ticket Sales in Intercol-legiate Athletics and the Extent to Which the Physical Education Program, the Physi-cal Education Department, and the 1UG.T.C. Department of Arlington State College Meet the standards 67

19* Standards for Care of Equipment in Inter-collegiate Athletics and the Extent to Which the Physical Mutation Program, the Physical Education Department, and the SLQ.T.C, Department of Arlington State College Meet the Standards 68

20, Standards for Trips in Intercollegiate Athletics and the Extent to Which the Physical Education Program, the Physical Education Department, and the R-G.I.C. Department of Arlington State College Meet the Standards . . . 70

21* Standards for Publicity for Intercollegiate Athletics and the Extent to Which the Physical Education Program, the Physical Education Department, and the R.G.T.C. Department of Arlington State College Meet the Standards . ?g

iri

fable PaS® 82. Standards for Assistance of leedy

Students In Intercollegiate Athletics ana the Extent to Which the Physical Education Program, the Physical Educa-tion Department, and the R.Q.T.C. Depart-ment of Arlington State College Meet the Standards. 7 3

S3, Sursmary of the Eatings* by Divisions, of the Standards of the Physical Education Program, the Physical Education Depart-ment, and the R.O.T.C. Department of Arlington State College • 7 6

w<-t

U A OF tumsMtims

Figure

1. Enrollment, By Years, at Arlington State College * 10

2. Percentage of Students from Dallas ana Tarrant Counties 14

CHAPTER I

JSfROPPCflOf

At Arlington State College the department of Health and

Physical Education means intramural athletics and intercol-

legiate athletics* Very little attention has tees given to

required physical education, from the beginning of the school

a great deal of emphasis has been placed on military training,

and for various reasons, some real and some imaginary, required

physical education has not been attempted.

For a long time physical education was regarded as an

activity to give a student the needed amount of physical exer-

cise, and it has been the opinion of sows school people and.

lapses. that R. o. T. C. would serve the same purpose.

Although the 1#. 0. T. C. and physical education depart*

seats, each in its respective field, sight stress some OOHIIEIOH

objectives, for the most part, the standards ©f a college health

and physical education department are quite different fro®

those of the H. 0. T. C. The extent of the differences between

the two departments became very significant as this study pro-

gressed.

Since Arlington State College is a junior college with

a large number of students taking terminal work, it provides

the last opportunity many of its graduates will have to learn

3

new sports in & supervised program of physical education.

IJnfortmately, much of their time at the college is used in

the relatively crowded class and laboratory schedule. It is

important that a college-sponsored program provide the students

with recreational skills that will be usable after they have

left college. Emphasis should be placed on teaching those

team and individual sports that the student will be likely to

play when he is away from the college facilities#

Statement of the Problem

The problem undertaken in this Investigation was that of

making an evaluation of the Physical Education Program of

Arlington Stat® College with recommendations for future devel-

opment.

Definition ©f fems

The investigator has used the following terms in the

study:

Physical Education "is that part of education which pro-

ceeds by means of, or predominantly through, physical activity?

it is not some separate, partially related field.1

flgfJMr fltofiftfrtfffi togff rtfers to activity programs,

intradural athletics, intercollegiate athletics, and profes-

sional courses in physical education.

^Sdward F. Voltmer and Arthur A. Esslinger, fh€ MM MlllMgllm 2l BlMMM P.M.'

Purposes of the Study

The general purposes of this study were as follows:

1* To select evaluative criteria by which the physi-

cal education program at Arlington State College is to be

evaluated.

2. To evaluate the organisation and administration of

the physical education program.

3. To evaluate the activity, intradural( and intercol-

legiate programs»

4. fo make re ©emendations for future development of

the program.

Limitations of the Study

This study was limited to the evaluation of the physical

education program at Arlington State College with recommenda-

tions for future development.

Sources of Data

lata _ utilised in this study were both documentary and

human. The documentary sources included books,, articles,

bulletins, and yearbooks of Arlington State College* and the

standards selected as criteria for the evaluation of the

problem. The hmaan sources included members of the staff and

administration of Arlington State College and leaders in the

field of physical education.

Procedure

In preparation for this study the investigator did exten-

sive reading in booksr professional magazines, unpublished

4

theses, and corresponded with leader# in the field of physical

education related to the field of physical education and

Junior colleges*

fhe selection of the measuring instrument for this study,

as well as an account of the procedure# in connection with the

administration of the instrument, will fee treated in detail '

in Chapter IV.

Organisation

The present chapter has contained a brief statement of

the problem* the purposes of the study, limitations of the

study, sources of data, and methods of procedure.

Chapter II consists of a brief historical description of

Arlington State College.

In Chapter III is presented changes in enrollment and

effect on athletic® aM physical education, history ©£ hoys *

physical education, history of girls* physical education,

history of intramural athletics, history of intercollegiate

athletics and professional courses in physical education.

Chapter IV includes a discussion of the selection of

the evaluative criteria for the evaluation of the orgsniaa-

tion and administration, required physical education, intra*

mural athletics, intercollegiate athletics and professional

courses in physical education.

Chapter V presents a mammary of the present program

along with conclusions and re commendations for future develop-

ment.

CHAPTER II.

A: BRIEF HISTORICAL DESCRIPTION

OF MUIQTGi STATE COLLEGE

For a ntBHber of years m institution of learning in the

form of a college has been located in Arlington* Its early

history is one of change,, both in management and philosophy,

bat there is evidence of a consistent desire on the part of

the residents of the community to have a college in'this

vicinity*

Arlington College was opened in 1895, and was closed in

1900 because of financial difficulties. After a period of

fund-raising and reorganisation, Carlisle Military Academy

opened in 1901 and continued through 1913, when financial

troubles sad a low enrolls®t again forced it *t@ close. In

the fall of 1913, still smother attempt was made, this time

under the nam® of Arlington Training School. It continued

&s~ such until 1917 *

In that year, the legislature of the State of Texas

first took an active interest in the Arlington school and

•changed one® sore the nature ©f the Institution* - Judge ?. M,

Grubbs of Greenville, a former legislator, urged the legisla-

ture to establish a vocational school in forth Texas. He

came to Arlington and found the local leaders of this city

'Hilling to supply the neeessary local support for his plan*

On March 16* 1917, & bill was enacted providing that a state

college should be established to Arlington, contingent upon

tli@ meeting of certain obligations by the people of that city.

The bill stipulated that the local citizens should donate on®

hundred acre® of good land in addition to the property of Car-

lisle Military Academy* which should be debt free.1 The record

show that the conditions were met during the same year, and

the Arlington School, this time with the name of Orubbs Voca-

tional College* became, along with John farleton State Agri-

cultural College, a part of the Agricultural and Mechanical £

College of Texas* These two Colleges were the first publicly-

supported junior colleges in the South* The college opened

in the fall of 1917 with twenty-six boys and forty girls

enrolled* M. L. Williams was appointed the chief adminis-

trative officer.

In 1923, the name was changed to forth Texas Junior Agri-

cultural, Mechanical, and Industrial College.3 This formid-

able appellation was popularly, but not officially, shortened*,

to North Texas Agricultural College or •1-tac", as it was

called by the students.- In 1925, Williams resigned and

£• B. Davis accepted the position* He continued

the State ojf Texas, passed by the Thirty-fifth legislature at its regular session, January 9.,. 1917, p* 60.

I. Herefordt "Report to the Board of Directors,* 1951,, p» 2.

3..

College, p. 1 Annual Catalogue. Horth Texas Agricultural

in this capacity until 1946, at which time £• H. Hereford

was installed. In 1948, the Texas Agricultural and Mechanical

College System was established and the institution at Arling-

ton became a part of the system, instead of a "branch* of Texas

A, and M. College. The title of the chief administrative offi-

cer was changed fro® •Dean*- to "President.M In 194©, the name

of the college was changed by the legislature to its present

form—Arlington State College.

Two major characteristics of the philosophy of Arlington

State College are traceable to its close relationship to Texas

A, andH.College: the military organization of the student body

and the staff, and the emphasis in the curriculum upon voca-

tional and technical subjects. The first of these Is of con-

siderable importance to this study and will be considered in

some detail. The students were among the very few in. state-

supported institutions to wear Amy R. 0. T. C. uniforms at

all tines m the campus and to be subject to the discipline '

of a military organization in the dormitories and during class

hours. For many years the Professor of Military Science and

Tactics was also the Commandant of men. in the latter capacity

he ruled in disciplinary matters and administered within the

dormitory through an organization of cadet officers. Recently,

the two responsibilities have been separated, and a civilian

commandant is in charge of the cadets. With a strong military

flavoring in its background, Arlington Starts College has

developed those traditions and usages which are to be found

8

In most of the schools of such a character, especially Texas

A and M College,

The second characteristic, that of emphasis on tech-

nical and vocational training, owes much of its strength to

the efforts of its second dean. E# 1* Davis. For a number of

years he conducted a study of the needs of industry in the

area in which the college is located and examined the offer-

ings of leading technical institutions throughout the country.

From these studies he developed a group of terminal courses

in engineering and allied fields which have been offered 4

during the last twenty years. On a comparative basis, it

appears that Arlington say legitimately be regarded as a

leader in terminal education in the junior college field.

There is no question but that the college is thought of pub-

licly and offically as predominantly a technical institution. .

M connection with the nature of the courses offered,

however, a curious fact becomes evident upon examination of

the enrollment of the various classes. The fact is that the

bulk of the students take the academic courses of English,

History, and Mathematics while at Arlington State College.

Consequently, the number of faculty members in these depart-

ments far exceeds that of the other departments combined * In

reality then, the emphasis, in terns of student hours, is on

the traditional liberal arts subjects at Arlington State College.

% . H. Hereford, "Report to the Board of Directors," 1951, p. 2.

9

There is yet a third characteristic of the college that

has nothing to do with its connection with Texas A. and M. Col-

lege; the fact that it has been- co-educational since its

beginning* However, the student body has always been pre-

dominantly male. This is d m to several factors. XJntil

1946, no dormitory facilities were available for women stu-

dents. Those vho could not live at home and coazcute lived

in private homes in the city of Arlington. The present

dormitories accommodate only eighty-four women. The college

has appealed more to the male population because of its excel-

lent military program, its emphasis on technical and scien-

tific courses, and the employment opportunities in this vici-

nity for male students with technical training.

The presence of wobmui students on the campus has, how-

ever, been a definite influence. Certain courses such as

Hoaas Economics, Physical Education for Women» and Typing and

Shorthand have appealed mainly to the girls. The faculty

includes a Dean of Women and a number of other women faculty

members, probably more than would be found in an all-raale

college.

The growth of the college was slow in the early years,

as shown by Figure 1, but accelerated rapidly after 19S3

•when the name was changed. The depression of the early '30's

caused & considerable decline in student registration. The

drop was short-lived, however, and in 1933 the enrollment

began to increase again and continued to do so until the

m

f f f f f f 5 s a 8 g 8 i ^ 8 ' 8 § * ® s M £ * * * f c & & 2 M ! 2 a a 2 ' ! : 3 2 M 8

moo MOO 8300 mm 22m moo 1900 18QO rroo *soo 1500 1400 1300 1300 1100 1000 900 ©00 too aoo too 400 300 800 loo

iaaaaaaaaaaaaaaajtlaaaa

O H ©I tO <«• tO <0 B>» < I s s i s s i i 1

#*# f"! &*$ f*w J fHf wi f

Fig. 1.—Eapolteent, by years, at Arlington State College

11

beginning of the Second World War, at wbieh time the enroll-

sent took a decided decline again* With the return of ex-

Service men and the enactment of the G. X* Bill, 1946 showed

an unprecedented increase in enrollment with the long-term

student count going to 2,498. More than 1400 of these were

ex-Service men*. The enrollment stoadily declined after that

year due to the withdrawal of veterans, the war in Kor«a,'the

excellent employment opportunitiss, and small high school en-

rollment* 'In the last two years there has been a definite

increase„ and there am indications that future enrollment

will fee larger.

Arlington State College has drawn a large portion of its

students from Dallas and Tarrant Counties* Because of its

central location, students were able to commute from Dallas

sad fort Worth, as well as from Grand Prairie, Irving, and

other smaller centers* This has meant that the college has

been largely a day school with a relatively small dormitory

population. Among the resident students there is a fairly

even distribution from counties in forth and East Texas*

Several agencies will control the future of Arlington

State College j asong them the legislature, the Board of Direc-

tors of the Texas A.and System, and the voting populace of

Texas# So factor has been more apparent in recent years,

however, than the tremendous population increase and urbanisa-

tion of the geographical area in which it is located. The

last census listed, mom than one million people in a forty

12

g

mile radius* A H the signs of booming growth are apparentt

rapid building, crowded public schools, intense ccnaierclal

and industrial activity. There are only .four counties in the

state with a population density of more than 400 per square

mile and the college is practically on the line dividing two

of them. Population in the City of Arlington continues to

increase explosively and without pause. From the standpoint

of numbers, the future of Arlington State College seems very

bright indeed*

For all its brevity, the history of Arlington State Col-

lege shows a steady development and a distinctive philosophy.

Its future program will be determined by the students it

serves. One thing is certain: alterations will have to be

made, both to keep pace with and to anticipate the changes

in tb$ nature of the surrounding community.

l a I M !teM laal sL B s & u 1953, p. 300.

CHAPTER III

PROBLEMS AND GEIERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE

PHYSICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

Although Arlington State College is in m excellent

geographical location and toss consistently attracted students

of high caliber, it has not always enrolled large numbers

fro® the neighboring cities of Dallas and Fort Worth. For the

first two years, most of the students case from an area near

Arlington. For the twelve years after that,. 1919 to 1931,

about half of the student body came fro® toms more than

twenty-five miles from the college.

Daring the period from 1932 until 1935, an average of

76 percent of the students lived within a radius of twenty-

five miles of the city of Arlington. This percentage figure

reached its peak during the two sessions of 1936-193? and

1940-1941,. during which years 89 percent entered the school

from Dallas and Tarrant Counties* Curiously enough, the

last peak year was followed by a rapid decline, and during

the academic, year of 1943-1944 only §0 percent ease from the

two counties. The percentage increased again rapidly after

that,, howeverr and for the year 1952-1953 it stood at 89 per-

cent as show in Figure 2.

It

u

frf @o <ki e> w oi it & <© e» m m o h m m

£»c®m

o> & o> Ch 0* &&.<$> m Cl <3* <&&& Gi & & 0i o> m o> <?> G> Xj Jlj iL§ ILL ZJ ZJ III ZJ 2 «JI 111 ZJ ZJ ZJ ZJ 2 ZJT ZJ ZJ ZJ ZJ ZJ ZJ

-IP* |r*f Irf f*"| ?H| fHt irHI F"f PHI fHI fHr fHI JrH| rHF fHf f"Hr *""1 lr*i fHI F"*I f""'! F""I H rt #*f

««* fyfjl P-. "

fe""^ ! *•/ A -

jP$®p£ P S *

* ^ \ i I "

i ; \ 5 . ;*:¥

K y

i

I "

If ,*

i

I "

"* i*> j H.' v*

i

I "

, * "*

i

I "

•t. J

f

i

I "

P i a • ' #

i

I "

r ..... t y i i

i

I "

W11 • "

t f

• i

" i

: a 4 :

«

•« 1

" r

1

* 4 ;

/ 1 i

1

* 4 ;

/ I f

' 7 ? ,v: r — —

X, s ^ -

•" r i ...,SW_i

J

Vlfe "J * , i

• I . 1

tr. , ^ i f r t c

• # V „ - f

'fr"''* 1

r " A' -f! -

* -«4~,

5 ^ , " M * r ." "M" i, - j ^

! T T , ' 1

a n

aosf

ts^

t m

SOji

m i

Wm

Fig* g.—Percentage of stu&ents from Dallas and Tarrant Cowities.

25

These figures indicate that Arlington Stat® College my

fairly fee considered, in large measure, a day school for those

living .in a twenty-five nil* radius of the college, even though

the precentage figures may fluctuate somawhat from year to year.

There is no question hut that the majority of the day students

come from the tm cities of Dallas and Fort Worth. The saving

to the student on. room arid board which he receives from living

at home, and the low tuition fees for a state-supported college

provide M a with an education at a very reasonable cost*

la the earliest days ©f the college* little' or no atten-

tion was paid to a physical education or athletic program.

Intradural contests of various sorts were held, including bas-

ketball, but most of the participating students lived on the

caapus or in Arlington. Intercollegiate athletics were engaged

in on a very irregular and informal basis, usually by the smm

group of resident students# There mm not many problem! con-

nected with the commuting students.

In recent years a ntaaber of such problems has arisen*

Obviously* the intramural and intercollegiate teams could not

be recruited entirely or even largely from the Arlington and

resident students. One very difficult problem exists in con-

nection with the intramural program. Many of the day students

spend little time on the campus when not actually In class

and are unwilling to return to the caapus in the late after*

noon or evening to participate in an intramural contest. Lack

of dressing room facilities discourages the student from spend-

ing the hours between classes in practice or informal contests.

x§

While the 1. 0# t * C. Company makes a convenient unit of com-

petition, a. 0. C. activities themselves consume a tog®

portion of the student * s extra tins*

lay attempt to schedule intramural contests at night has

been unsuccessful because the students living in sections of

Dallas and Fort Worth were unwilling to wait on the campus,

and it ms impractical for then to go home and return in the

evening for the contest* For the MOM reasons night nestings

of intercollegiate athletic teams are practically impossible,

and many tines in practice key mm have had to leave early in

order to have transportation home. Because of th®' location

of the college and its student body, the problems mentioned

above have consistently plagued the Department of Athletics

and Physical Education# So single solution has ever been

devisedt nevertheless, the program of intercollegiate athletics

has in recent years increased in atse and effectiveness, and

the program of intramural athletics continues to present,

expanding or contracting from year to year, activities allied

to the interests sM abilities of the students.

there is a© question but that the substitution of

a . 0, J* C» participation for physical education has in*

hibited the growth and effectiveness of th® related programs

of intramural and intercollegiate athletics. There are many

indications that future changes in the philosophy of the insti-

tution, which are already being presaged by certain changes in

the rules for students, will make possible extensive improve-

ments in the whole situation.

17

History of Intercollegiate Athletics

The colleges that preceded Grubbs Vocational College

ua&er the names of Carlisle Military Academy and Arlington

Vocational Training School did sponsor athletic? teams which

engaged in contests with various to am# in the area on a vary

irregular and infoiraal basis.

80on after its founding, Grubbs Vocational College

became a member of the Texas Junior College Athletic Associa-

tion* In 1933# North Texas Agricultural College withdraw

from the above organization to become a member of the Central

Texas Junior College Association* The new conference was

formed in order to decrease the tea® traveling ©sEpeiises and

to give the championship more geographical meaning* forth

Texas Agricultural College continued as a member of this con-

ference until the fall of 194«, at which time it became a mem-

ber of the Southwestern Junior College Conference, which was

composed of John Tarleton Agricultural College, Kilgore Junior

College, Paris Junior College, San Angelo Junior Colleget

Schreinar Institute, Lamar College, forth Texas Agricultural

College, and Hardin Junior College, which was replaced one year

later by Tyler Junior College.

By the autumn of 1950, many changes had taken place in

the auaber apfl character of the junior colleges in Texas# In

order to accomodate itself to the new situation, Arlington

State College, along with Tarleton State College, Schreiner

Institute, and San Angelo Junior College, withdrew from the

23

Southwestern. Conference and formed the Pioneer Athletic Con*

ference. Banger Junior College was added making the present

five-tea® conference.

Football, basketball, track, and tennis have been spon-

sored sine© the first year of the college*# organisation.

Baseball was played during the years 191? to 1930, but was

discontinued at that time and 1ms not been resumed. Golf was

added to tli® schedule in 1989 and has • been present ever since*

A boxing team competed in the two year# 1933 to 1935* Swim-

ming and wrestling teams were sponsored for a single year each,

in 1931 and 1934, respectively.

The relative success of the various teams has fluctuated

widely over the years, as had the interest on the part of the

students. For the aost part, the spectators have been inter-

ested in the football team, except for isolated periods in

which one of the other teams enjoyed particularly good years.

The low point of interest in all sports occurred during the

years from 1937 until 1937, even though lights were installed

at the football field in 1935. In recent years each season

has brought a small but steady increase in gate receipts in

football, mtil quite recently the expenses of the depart-

ment of physical education were about three times the amount

of the gate receipts at athletic contests. Local and state

funds made up the difference.

There were no athletic scholarships given at Arlington

State College until 1951. In the early nineteen-thlrties

19

the Rational Youth Administration provided some job® oa

the campus, but these were open to all students, Including

athletes# Slue® 1961 the President of the Collage and a local

organization have been active la providing aid to the athletes

in the torm of jobs for scholarships.

fhe high point In the fortune# of the football team

occurred during the academic year of 1942-1943, when ths ¥-12

Program of the lavy sent a number of the nation*a leading

athlete® to the campus. this was followed fey the bleakest

period of all, with the low point in 1949, when not a single

game m $ won. Since that nadir the quality of teams has

greatly improved* Arlington State College won the Champion-

ship of the Pioneer Conference in the two academic years of

19§3 and 1@§4*

Generally speaking, the athletic tea»s have been com-

posed of boys who took part for the enjoyaent they could

receive from suoh participation, tint 11 quite recently, there

has been an absence of pressure on the coaches t© win, and

the intercollegiate athletle program has been thought ©f

as another department of the college for the development of

the student.

History of the Boys1 Physical Education

Several factors have Influenced the course of development

which the program of physical education 1ms taken? one of these

however, far outranks all the others In importance. It is the

30

fact that H* 0. f, C# twining has been allowed to satisfy

the requirement for physical education. Such an interpret

tation of the requirements has placed the emphasis on mili-

tary activity rather than m physical education. l*rge *

numbers of the student population were not touched in any

way by the physical education program. Daring the first

eight years of' the school's existence# no trained personnel

supervised the program, activities being carried on by the

members of the teaching staff. Uhtil the gymnasium was

built in 1933* a© facilities that even approached adequacy

were available to the student for dressing or play.

The fact that a large number of the students were on the

campus only during the day worked to augment the difficulties

created by the military philosophy. Military training occu-

pied those hours during the week that would normally be spent

in physical education classes, and it was very difficult for

the student to find additional campus hours during which he

Bight take an extra course in physical education. This situa-

tion led t® an official difficulty to g.® with the practical

ones. Beginning with 1919-1980 each student was required to

take si* hours per week of physical training including three

hours of military duty each week. This three hours of physi-

cal exercise and games in addition to the three hours of mili-

tary drill was quoted in the catalogue as a requirement each

year until 1933-34. So systematic effort was made to carry

21

it out, however, and in 1935 the preten.se was dropped

altogether. Since the very beginning, the actual »quir@d

physical education for men has consistea of three hoar® per

week of military drill,

those students who do not take military training m m •

required to take physical education in the for® of courses

aetting two hours a week and carrying one hour of credit.

The first of these is described in the catalogue as being

devoted to "two hours per week of minor sports activity and

it

.8

1 rules interpretation." The course for the second year is

"two hours per week of activity and health instruction. *'

In addition to the above required courses, the depart-

ment offers two professional courses, one in the materials

m i methods of physical education and the otter in materials

and methods of health education. These courses are open to

both boys and girls and are' designed to satisfy the state

requirements for elementary school teachers.

Table 1, on the following pages, shows the personnel

of the m&'s physical education department. These men

served as instructors in physical education, intramural

athletics, and the sports shown. The games of football,

basketball, baseball, track, and tennis have been offered

to students under the supervision of the.se instructors.

,rt<EO Arlington State- College, ffefety,s£|X | Imsl, 1952*53, p* 147.

8IfeMf,t p» wa,

3!ABLE I

PERSONNEL, MEN'S PHYSICAL EDUCATION department., 1917.193s

fear M$£k Football Basketball

1917-18

1916-19

1919-SO

1920-21

1981-82

19B2-2S

1983*184

1984-25

1985-36

1986-87

1927-88

1988-89

1929-30

1930-31

1981-52

1932-33

J. H. McElroy

L» W, Calna, Jr.

It

C, A,.. Dueral

C. A, Doval J. C» Moore

C. A. ©awl L» f» Calne, Jr,

C, M* Eduijs J* C. Moore L. W. Gains, Jr.

»

J* C. Moore

J* C* Moore W* U Hughes H. A» D. Dunsworth

J. C» Moore H» A. D» Donswortb

J» C« Moor® 1* A# D» tfrmwmHh J* F* Joyce

J* n . McSlroy

L* W* C&ine, Jr.

W. A. Itosoa

J* C. Moore

C* M» Mens j • C • Moore

C. M. Mens

J. 0. Moore

# <

m

TABLE I—Cont iraaArt

Sport Tear Tear

Football Basketball

1933-34 : E» W* Lambert S» W* Lambert 1. Ju D* Dunsworth

1934-35 « If

1935-36 w Hi

1956-37 J• &» BolS6S J. 0. Holmes H* A. Dr IXmsworth

1937-38 K # >

1938-39 * a

1939-40 *

1940-41 J. 6. Holmes T. J. Tinker T* J • Tinker

1941-48 N «

1942-43 » • J. G« Holmes

1943-44 J. Q. Holmes J# Q» Holme® Jackson

1944-45 «J *. 0* Holiues 1, S. fie

1945-46 * J. G. Holmes

1946-47 J. 6* Holmes T» J. Tinker T. J. Tinker

1947-40 <J» Holmes H T* J«. Tinker

L. Bearden 1948-49 »• *

1949-50 • It

1950-61 : tt

1951-52 AX Milch «kv B. L* Bearden T. J. Tinker

1952-53 W • J-» jStspulsc w B. L, Bearden T. J. Tinker

m

t me b

Y«ar Sport Y«ar Baseball track ftttaii

im~u • J* I# MoSlpoy J * R* UeHlmf £» ft* McEJuPOjr it# *• C8lilM§ $Tt : l># w• CaiBfi) Jr«; l«» «t* Caia*t Jr#

%w»m ; 5# f* Meyer i » ; i* H« £« ftoiSii S* A* DttVtl C* A* BusraX

19£ueg| » « *

l9S£«8ft 0 m it 2*&&«&4: C. H# &«aft : <?« (J# K#6«5 <3* C m iimm

W» u Hwgiies #

ft m *

isat-tt?; » ! # #

2997*496; Jt 0# 14#© C» P* Itatph f* 3.# lOWlS # J* C« M@0» *

JMS-SC ft <?* B* Pntet&Kl 203G«4X * II

* n If **•&. II n 3W»*»®4 ; * t§ I9M«a6i II II

TMIM I—Contlnued

Jem ; Spor t

Jem ; Spor t

B a s e b a l l f r a e k l a n n i i

1935-36 : Dlseontinmea : H+A«D»2)mjnfartlk 1* W. lambert

3sm**m « S«A *0 » taum» v th

IS 87-88: H H

I f 88-89: II w.

1989-40 if

1940-41 T» J . f i l ace r I# J* {fooiiieart

1941-40 « *

1948<-48' 3* 0 . Holmes J . 0 . Holmes

1948-44. Mo t r a c k No t e n n i s

1944-48 G. Holmes J . G. Holmes

1948-48 : : f . J . T inke r ft

1946-47 M if

1947-48 • «

294h8«49 II «

1949-80 • •

1980-81 » : v» M# Pmt%mm

l i i l - $ g A1 Milch • f * J* f l u t e d

1958-88 W. F* Zapalac it

£6

There has been a total of ten different head coaches

in football during the period from 191? to 1953* The

coaches in basketball, track, and tennis were usually the

football coach or an assistant in football. This would

indicate that more emphasis has been placed ©n football

since the very beginning of the institution.

History of Girls* Physical Education

During the first year of the college*s operation, no

physical education of any kind was required of women* In

the two years that followed * 1918-1919, six hours a week

of supervised physical training were added as a require-

ment. This training was carried on in a very unsystematic

manner and was conducted by various members of the faculty.

Ho trained personnel were employed for the purpose of set-

ting up the program. Classes did not meet regularly and

the roll was seldom called.

fable B, on the following pages, shows the members

of the wxnen's physical education staff and their position

in the department of physical education. These women

usually teach the professional courses in the department.

tmm z

P E R S O N N E L , W O M M ' S P H Y S I C A L E D U C A T I O N

B E P A f f l M E U T , 1 9 1 7 - 1 9 5 3

Y e a r N a m e P o s i t i o n

1 9 1 7 - 1 8 I © " w o m e n * s P h y s i c a l

E d u c a t i o n D e p t .

1 9 1 9 - 8 0 S i x h o u r s p e r v e e k b u t

s u p e r v i s e d t h r o u g h

o t h e r d e p a r t m e n t s .

1 9 2 0 - E l m-

1 9 2 1 - 2 2 S i b l e y l o s s : P h y s i c a l T r a i n i n g

1 9 2 2 - 8 3 *. n. •f

1 9 8 3 - 8 4 S u s i e K i n g * *

1 9 2 4 * - 2 5 M a r t h a W o o d s o n *« tt

1 9 2 5 - 2 6 «t it- »

1 9 2 6 - 2 7 # * t»- *

1 9 2 7 - 2 6 ' m- n » »

1 9 2 8 - 2 9 i w m • «

1 9 2 9 - 3 0 «t m * #

4 . 9 3 0 t - 3 1 ' iMtm 1 # 2 2 ® B a r b e r l e a d W o m e n 1 # P h y s i c a l

l a t a c a t i a i i D e p a r t m e n t

XmiMB : ' " * f t *• It t !

1 9 3 2 - 3 3 ; n <n w it tt t*

1 9 3 3 - 3 4 ; M i r a i i e G A e s e e k ® t t if it

1 9 3 4 - 3 5 It ii * «t »

8®

f m m

Year Msiae Position

1935-36 I M e KM .te Brjrson Ebad' Women* ft Phjrsieal Sdueation Department

1936-37 m H It it- tt W

1937-$8 m i§ ft it * if

1938-39 Olenda Bsvil # «» m

1&39-40 H a it n m

1940-41 M & i e Scruggs H ft

1941-42 it t t m #

1948-43 ; * « ii * It

1943-44 VbuMm HugMMI «t «

1944-45 n * II * if

1945-46 Marion Weaver : ft tt it

1946-47 M d i e Seruggs « tt 19

1947-46 | * ft # ft ft

1946-49 i It ii «» it

1949-SO : «t « it it 19

1960-61 : it « m it

19S1-5E ' tl t ® it ii

1952-53 H «* it II ft

89

Six different women have sewed la the department ever

a period of thirty~*ix years. For the first three years, bo

particular person was assigned the duty of supervising the

program* Then in 19£0*81 a separate department of physical

education and expression was established.

the courses In required physical education are described

as follows s

Exercisefbr poise, presence, and hearing, for grace and ease of manner.. Physical training in It® relation to health and beautyj psychophysical culture \ harmonic movements j marching;. measurements j chest development. breathing exercises, personal hygiene j exercises for the vital organs j games, simple folk dances; educations gymnastic** including free standing and apparatus move*

Mo substantial change was made in either the requirement

or the description of the course for the next eight years.

Boring this time *. the students were required to spend two

hours at practice and one at theory instruction each week,

la the years from 1989 to 1934, the girl® were allowed

to elect to practice in either hiking, basketball, volley

ball, indoor baseball, calesthenicst folk dancing, tennis,

or archery# Theory consisted of hygiene study. Although

minor changes have been made since in the sports that the

student might choose, the plan for conducting the course is

substantially the same. The catalogue for 1953-54 reads as

followsi

Both, freshmen and sophomore girls are allowed to elect their practice work from the activities offered

%rabbs Vocational College, Foua^h Mnua^ g§lBteS»# 1988*1983, p. 68*

30

during the several seasons, It is recommended that at least one semester of dancing be taken, lot more than two semesters of the same sport may be selected. The activities include; tennis, tap dancing, folk dancing* basketball, volley ball, Softball, fencing, archery, table tennis# badminton, and marksmanship.

At various times in the late thirties attempts were made

to inaugurate professional courses in physical education other

than those described above. Difficulty was encountered by the

students in transferring courses, however, since the senior

colleges regarded them as third-year courses and were reluc-

tant to accept thea from a Junior college. In general, the

physical education program for women at the college has remained

limited because of the small number of women students.

History of Intramural Athletics

In the early days of the college there was considerable

overlapping between the intramural and required programs.

Some early attempts were made to use the military company as

the unit of competition for athletics to satisfy the physical

training requirement of the three hours per week of physical

exercise in addition to military drill.

The required physical education was disassociated from

intramurals in 19£S» Since that time competition has been

held in track, tennis, Softball* basketball, golf, football,

and touch football.

^Arlington State College, Thirty-fifth Annual Catalogue. 1953-54, p. 147.

SI

In 1934-35 a scoring systaa was installed and the

entire program was revises, the sport calendar was enlarged

to include Softball, tennis, golf# horseshoes, cross country,

free throw,, basketball, volley tellt boxingt wrestling, and

track* At the close of the winter season, Ka fight ftight* was

held, concluding the sports of basketball, volley ball,

boxing and wrestling* At that time the military company was

the unit of competition* This stimulus gradually waned be-

cause of interest on the part of the students,

2n 1950, the unit of competition was changed to doiwitory

ramps and floors, and campus organizations in an effort to

stimulate interest*. A survey of the activities for the sepa-

rate years reveals that the intramural program has had to be

limited or expanded to meet the interests of the students.

Some student bodies have been more "sports-minded" than others,

the reluctance of the day students to return to or remain on

the campus for an intradural contest has been a constantly

inhibiting factor,*

CHAPTER 17

M EVALUATION OF THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION

M M M M OF ARUNSTOH STATE COLLEGE

W* L. Hughes in M s IgllUlSlmllia %l M 1 B MB.

i i m M » i M ia» up a selected Mat of 164

standards and policies which should be considered basic 1

to a college physical education program.

From a vide reading of the literature of the field

approicim&tely 85G standards mm selected. These statements

were written on 4 x 6 inch cards and arranged under on®

of four ssa or headings: administrative plan, required physi-

cal education, intramural athletics, and intercollegiate

athletics.

The standards were further arranged under sufc head*

in§s. A yisit was paid to each of twelve colleges and ml-

versities in the eastern and mid-western sections of the

United States* Interviews were held with approximately

ninety individuals each of whom was connected with some

administrative phase of the college health and physical edu-

cation parogimas* The standards were revised .in the light

of existing practices in the twelve selected institutions.

Four groups of specialist# were chosen, one for each

division of objectives. A group consisted of from one to S — —

I• Hughes, Administration o£ fiealth and M M t m teu ppTa-is.

m

fifteen men. Each group rated only those objectives in its

own division. The Judges war© asked to rate the policies

according to the following scale: 5—essential; 4—highly

desirable; 3—desirable; 2—some value; 1—no value. The

data were tabulated in simple for® and the total actual value

for each statement was turned into a percent value. The per-

cent was obtained by dividing the actual score by the highest

possible score# The highest possible score was determined

in each case by Multiplying by five the number of jurors

reporting OBI the statement, the actual score was determined

by simple addition of the various ratings given by the Judge.

Of the original list of standards, 35.63 percent or

164 received a rating of between 90 and 100 and were con-

sidered essential, fine basis and authority for this study

will be this list of essential standards as compiled by

Hughes except that all sections of the physical education

program were not included. The standards* as developed by

Hughes, were set up for the administrative plan, health super-

vision, health, health instruction* required physical educa-

tion, intisaur&l athletics, and intercollegiate athletics.

The present study is limited to an evaluation of the adminis-

trative plan, required physical education, intramural ath-

letics, and intercollegiate athletics. Mot all the standards

set up by Hughes, therefore, were utilised.

Three phases of the physical education program of Arling-

ton State College were evaluated against the selected standards

m

to determine the extent to which each standard Is mt t

CD the entire physical education program, <8) the physical

education department» sad (3) the R. 0, T. C. department.

the following rating scale was used in making the evaluations;

3»-ftoe standard Is satisfied entirely.

2«-?fce standard is met in a fairly satisfactory maimer.

1—fh@ standard is satisfied in only a Halted way.

0—Wo attention is given to the satisfaction of the standard.

The plan of rating the R« 0. T. C» department toy using

standards which are criteria for college progress in health

and physical education is done with full knowledge that

authorities in the field of health and physical education

feel that an R» 0* T. C. program is in no way an adequate

substitute for any part of a good progran of health and physi-

cal education. However, since the R. 0. T« C. progran in the

situation is being studied and is being advocated at a substi-

tute for parts of aa adequate health and physical education

program, it becomes important to see to what extent such a

substitution is justified.

Jhe evaluation of the selected phases of the physical

education program of Arlington State College is presented in

both discussion and table form. It should be explained that

the numbers of the standards as presented are not in numerical

order but follow the number of the standards as set up by Hughes*

m

I. Administrative Plan

Only one item la administration KM selected as essential

toy the furors in the Hughes study as a standard to be used

for evaluation* This it«m is as follows:

1. the administration ©f health and physical educa-tion (including athletics) is the responsibility of the institution and should he under its complete control.*'

She physical education program of Arlington Stat© College

has a. rating of 2 on its administration. The physical educa-

tion department, however, ha# a rating of 1, which Indicate#

the standard Is met In only a Halted way. The B» 0. T. C.

department has a rating of 0 In administration.

II. Required Physical Education

Organisation SB& ?W.--Bleven "«•* » » lnalsdea In the

standards set up for the organization and staff of a required

college education program, These itens and the ratings given

the three phases of the present study at Arlington State Col-

lege are shown In fable 3.

As shorn In Table 3, the physical education program and

the physical education department of Arlington State College

have a fating of 3 In five instances: standards, 2, 3, 10, 13,

and 14. In four instances, Standards 1, 4, 6, and 18, the physi-

cal education program and the physical education department

have a rating of 2 which means fairly satisfactory. Both of

these phases have a rating of 0 on Standard 5. The 1* 0. T. C.

Department has a rating of 0 on all of the selected standards.

S

36

TABLE 5 \

STANDARDS FOR TEE ORGAHIZATIOS M B STAFF OF A COLLEGE PHYSICAL EDUC&TIQI PROGRAM AND THE EXTE8T fO WHICH THE PHYSICAL IBtJCATIOI PROGRAM, TIE PHYSICAL EDtJCAT ION BIPAET1EIT,

AMD THE a.O.I.d. DEPAfHMERT OF ARUMTC* STATE COLLEGE MEET THE STANDARDS f

standards o o.

Ratings

1# Physical education should include all re$uired activities, both elective and restrictive* intramural athletic# $ and intercollegiate athletics • • * • «

E» Physical education staff members, including athletic coaches, with this • requisite academic training should' he granted the same faculty rating «• simi-lar training would command in other departments. . .

3. The physical education staff members including all coaches should he expec-ted to attend faculty meetings regu-larly unless actually in charge of a class or tea® at the time of the faculty meeting .

4» Physical education instructors in the required activities should hair® a college degree, and an undergraduate major of at least 40 semester hours in health and physical education or the

' P * • • * * * •

5» Directors of physical education should told a Bachelor's degree with a major in health and physical education and should have had graduate work: in this field and preferably a Master of Arts or Doctor of Philosophy Degree. .

$

3

5

0

ft

37

TABUS 5—"Continued

standards

Batings

r4 •

•i •H & § •

i

8&» *i # nn

o * • H4» • # O ft ,S6j

<r

$# Physical #ftueatlott instructors should be selected who are specialists in at least one phase of the program, and *ho, in addition,, are trained in a wMs variety of the. activities of the depart*! ment (©thistles* swiaaing, intradural, teacher training,, etc.)

?• Members of the physical education staff Should belong to the' important state, sectional, and national organi-zation of the American Physical Bteca-tion Association# and the Society of Directors of Physical Education In Sol-leges • * » » » • » • • • •

10. Five hours should be the maximm loai: of actual teaching, on any one day

li* Instructors in physical education and coaches of athletic teams should wear a costume suitable: to the activity being taught#' * • • « • • • •

13« Each member of the physical educa-tion staff should be provided with a desk and a filing .cabinet • • * .

13* A secretary or office cleric should be on duty la the physical education office daily • * « » * * . •

0

0

0

0

33

—Only om Item wis Included

In the standards for classification of physical education stu-

dents :

15* Every student entering the institution should he required to take a health examination, and should he classified according to his physical fitness for physi-cal activities into at least two groupsi those students who are without'significant physical handicaps# and those who should fee restricted because of limitations revealed by the examination.

No examination or classification is Bade by the physical educa-

tion department of the college, but the fL 0* T. C* department

requires a complete examination* The ratings received by the

physical education program and the physical education depart-

ment are, therefore, 0, and the one for the 1. Q. t* C. depart-

ment is 3, or very satisfactory.

_ Requirements- —Two items are included in the standards

for requirements* The first of these is Standard 88 and

reads as follows t

23. Physical education activities should teg carried on

out-of-doors whenever the weather permits.

Ratings received on this standard by the physical education

program and the physical education department of the school

are 1* which indicates that the standard is met only in a

limited way. The girls1 physical education at the school meets

the standard, but boys' physical education is not required for

boys taking R.O.T.C.- The R.Q.T.C. department has a rating of 0»

The second item included in the requirements for a physi-

cal education program is Standard 31 and reads as follows: sibid.. x>. 68^ '^ibiirr p.ia. ~

31* The shower bath should be a part of the regular

, physical education period.5

Eatings of £ are assigned the physical education program and

the physical education department on this standard* The

shower bath is part of the regular physical education program

for the girls* the H.O.T.C. department has a rating of 0 on

this standard,

Instruction. —Three items are included in the standards

for instruction for evaluation in the study. These items

and the ratings given each are shorn in fable 4.

TABXJI 4

STAIDAHBS FOR THS INSTHUCTIOB OF A COLLEGE PHYSICAL EDUCATIOH PBOORAM M D THE EXfMT TO WHICH THS PHYSICAL EVOCATION PRO-01AM| THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT» AMD THS R.O.T.C. BEPAHTHEST or muumm STATS COUSOB MEET THE STANDARDS

Standards

T-f * • * <8 • B f H N ta ft. FFISF

1 % j§

gt« '

F S

d * #

* m O ft * fl>

32. Physical education classes should be used priaarily as instruction periods wherein students learn suitable activi-ties and develop neuromuscular skills which can be used out of school. , » 3 3 0 34. Undergraduates Should not be used as instructors in physical educations ©lessee except under close supervision . . . 3 3 0

•35. Instruction should be offered in a U voluntary activities to upper classmen ««d faculty if they desire instruction* 0 0 0

Eatings

Ibid., p. 71.

40

The physical education program and the physical educa-

tion department of Arlington Stat# College have a rating of

3 on both Standards 38 and 34# Each has a rating of 0 on

Standard 35« The R.Q.T.C. department has a rating of 0 on

all three of the standards#

Six Itesi are included in the standards set up for attend-

ance for a college physical education program. These items

and the rating! given the three phases of the present study

at Arlington State College are shorn in fable 8*

TABUS §

STANDARD8 FOR A F F U M C B OF A COLLEGE PHYSICAL EOTCAFXQK PRO-GRAM MB THE EMTWT TO WHICH THE PHYSICAL ITOATIOI PROGRAM, THE PHYSICAL EOTCATIOI DEPARIMHKT, MB Til R.O.T.C. DEPART-

mm OF MIIMFM STATE COLLEGE MEET THE STANDARDS

Standards

Ratings

M m 8 T

o • • ««• O » SSJ

8$» Attendance should be recorded by some rapid method which does not require more than one or two minutes of time which otherwise might be used for in* struction or activity 36* Students should not be excused, per* aanently or temporarily, from physical education except upon the advice of the department of health education . . # 31+ Absences should be treated in the same maimer in physical education as they art handled in other departments of the Institution . . . . . . . 4#* Students who participate regularly throughout the year to intramural ath-letics should not be excused permanently from the required physical education »

0

0

41

TABXiB 5~

Standards

M'lagt r*f {rt u

PJ|

• m

11

« o • • Ht 6 CN «

SO. Members of the squad of intercolle-giate teams who have not fulfilled th© institution^ physical education require-ment sho\ild be required to report back to th© regular physical education classes within one week after the intercollegiate schedule is completed . . , . . .

49 » Students who are dropped from a squad of intercollegiate teams should be expected to report back immediately to a regular•physical education class » » 0

0

0 0

As shown in fable 5, the physical education program and

the physical education department of Arlington State College

have a rating of 1 caa Standards 36, 38, 37, and 46 which indi-

cates that the standards were mt in only a limited way. Each

has a rating of 0 on Standards 49 and 50. Physical education

is not required for students at the college who take R.O.T.C,

training and they are excused permanently from such activity.

The R.O.T.C. department, therefore, has a rating of 0 on all

the standards set up for attendance in a college physical edu-

cation program.

Credlt.—Cfae item pertaining to standards for credit is

included In th® criteria for the study* fhis item reads as

followsI 52. The institution should have positive credit granted for physical education on the basis of laboratory credit In the sciences.®

u. •?».

4 Z

ftoe physical education progran and the physical education

department of Arlington Stat# College have a rating of 5 on

Standard 58 which indicates that it is met to a satisfactory

manner. The R.O.T.C. department has a rating of 0 on the

Standard.

Four Items are included in the standards for a program

of activities for a college physical education department.

These iteas and the ratings given the three phases of the

study at Arlington Stat© College are shown in Table 6.

TABLE 6

simmms FOR ATTSKMSCI FOB A COLLEGE PHYSICAL EDUCATIOH PRO-GOT, THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION PROGRAM, TIE PHYSICAL BJ30CAT108 BEPAHTMEMT A3D THE R.O.T*C. DS-

PARTMEST OF ARLINGTON STATS COLLEGE MESS THE STA!PAf®S

Ratings

Standards

5S* Instructors in physical education should lie encouraged to indicate desir-able changes in. the program and to ex-periment with various methods and pro cedure® « • #. * * . * » • 56. The program of physical education should contain a variety of activities of informal typ«, including team games and »carry.over* or individual sport# 58 • Students who are planning to elect physical education activities should he expected to remain in the same activity long enough to acquire some skill in and an. appreciation of the activity , «. 00. The physical education activity pro-gram should he supplemented by knowl-edge test® and motor achievement tests

§ 5

1

1

0

0

0

43

According to the data in Table 6, the physical education

prcgraa and the physical education department of Arlington

Stat® College have a $ rating m Standard 56, and a 1 rating

on Standards 58, 58, and 60, The B.O.T.C. department has a

rating of 0 on all the standards. Hon-participation of the

boys in the H.O.T.C. department in the physical education pro-

gram was the main cams® of the low rating m the majority of

the standards for attendance.

Marks.—One standard was set up by Hughes study for

evaluation of the marking system used in determination of

students' grades. The item is as follows:

61, Student*s marks (grades) in physical education should he based largely on achievement, where pos-sible , and on knowledge tests#'

The rating given the physical education program and the

physical education department on Standard 61 is 1, which

indicates that the standard was net to a limited degree. It

was met in a satisfactory manner by those taking physical

education, but the boys did not participate la the program.

The R.O.TfC. departiaent has a rating of 0 on the standard.

Two standards were set up by the Hughes study for the

use of tests in a college physical education program. The

first of these, Standard 62, is as follows:

68. Insults of instruction in physical education should be determined by tests, such as achleveaient

7lbid.. p. 75.

44

tests, la activities where such tests are avail-able, and on knowledge tests of the written short-answer type.e

Ho tests in physical education are given at Arlington Stat®

College, so that all three phases of the study evaluated

have a rating of 0 on Standard 68*

fh© second standard for tests is as follows*

§6* Students should he required to show, in addition to swimming* some skill in at least two organized team games, and two "carry over" sports before credit is granted in physical education, this skill should be determined by tests, if available, or by judgments of staff members,9

All phases of the study have a rating of 0 on Standard 66

beeause no tests are given in the physical education pro*

gram*

fen items are included in the standards for restric-

tive and corrective physical education, these items and 'the

ratings given them are shown in fable 7.

According to the data in fable 7, the physical educa-

tion program and the physical education department have

ratings of 3 in five instances, namely, Standards 67 , 74,

80, ai, and 82. They have ratings of 0 on Standards 68,

66, 69, 71, and 78. The R.O.T.c. department has a rating

of 0 on all of the standards.

8Ibld.. p. 75.

9Ibid., p. 76.

45

fAILS 7

STANDARDS FOR RESTRICTIVE AND CORRECTIVE PHYSICAL EIRJCATIC® IB A COLLEGE PHYSICAL EDUCATION PROGRAM AMD TIE EXTEHT TO

WHICH THE PHYSICAL IDUCATIW PROGRAM, THE PHYSICAL EDOCATIOM DEPARTMENT AND THE R.O.T.C. DEPARTMENT OF ARLINGTON STATE COLLEGE MEET THE STAHDARDS

Standards

Ratings

o * *

* *

o tm * m akJBL

67. The department of physical education should provide restricted physical edii-cation for those individuals who are physically handicapped„ whether perman-ently or temporarily

69. Physical education should not he a hospitalized procedure and only those students who cannot profit sore by the regular program should be given restric-ted exercise and activity, which approx-imates as closely as possible the regu-lar program, and which is compatible with the physical defect . . . . .

71. The clinical procedure for indivi-dual corrections should be administered by especially trained teachers ©f ortho-pedics who carry on individualized in-struction under the close supervision of a thoroughly qualified doctor of medicine

72. The department of physical education should determine the individual needs of physically handicapped students, bring about an intelligent understanding and appreciation ©f the defect by the stu-dent, and outline and provide a program of activities

0

46

Tmm

Standards

Eatings

m i m

• o # * H4* • * Q £, *

74# Students in restricted physical edu-cation should be given ©pportmity to participate and acquire skills in team gases anA "carry over* sports, as far as this is possible without harm to the individual . . .

?6. students with remediable defects, such as poor vision, infected tonsils, bad teeth, etc., should b© expected to have the defect removed or treated at the earliest possible date , » ,

79* Students in the restricted physical education group should be marlsed "pass* or •fail1' on the basis of a wittte or oral eawiaation or demonstration. They should be able to diagnose their own case and show achievement in sicills or improvement in correcting the defect, or both « « * • • • * • * •

80• fhe department of physical educa-tion should provide first aid equipment and treats®®.* * . » • # * » * * *

SI* fb® staff in physical education should under no circumstances attempt to diagnose or treat pathological con-ditions unless trained in medicine «

62. students is the department of physi-cal education who are in need of medical attention should be directed to the health service * * * * * » + #

o

3

3

$

0 0

0 0

0

4?

Facilitys m l §auteafc»-St8nflaras for facilities and

equipment are set up under the following classifications: (1>

field® and courts r (8) uniforms and towels; <3) purchase and

mm of equipment $ (4) baskets* lockers, and loclcer rownsf

(5) shower and shower rooms $ and (6) the swimming pool*

Standards for the first fire of these classifieations and the

rating the three phases of the study haw been given on them

are shown in Table 8. The Arlington State College has ao

swimming pool and the standards for such a pool, therefore,

are omitted.

tmiE a

STANDARDS FOR FACILITIES M D I Q m « FOB A COLLEGE PHYSICAL EDUCATION PROGRAM AND THE EXXEKf TO WHICH THE PHYSICAL SDOCATIQM PROGRAM, THE PHYSICAL EDtrCAIIGH DEPARTMENT,

M B THE R»O.T»C» BEPMTMSSf OF ARLINGTON S M I CCLLEGi:; mm THE 8TAJIDARD3

Standard, s

Ratings

o * #

4* Oft 031

88, A golf course* public, private, or owned by the institution, should be available for • student use at a minimua cost to the students 89. All physical education facilities should be located within convenient walking distance of the campus . . « 9B. The tesiperature of the gymnasium in winter should not go below SSdegroes F.. 99 • The physical education department should provide the facilities and per* sorrnel for storing and caring for equip-sent « • » • » • • « * • •

3

3

3

3

0

0

0

48

TABLE 8-^ontlmied

Eatings

Standard3 J m *1$

HfJ m • m 0 , ;

fpljl A M j f t i * 0

E i

*

o # *

f y i : $g"f , II *» O £•<&* H K W m m

Uniforms «"<* Towels

105 • The institution should furnish towels for physical education classes . 0 • 0 : 0

106, An attendant or custodian should be provided to distribute and collect equip-ment (uniforms, towels, balls, etc.) at all hours when the physical education facilities are in use 3 • s 0

Purchase and Care of Equipment

10?* The physical education department should provide facilities and personnel for repairing equipment or should sake arrangements for having the repair work done outside the department . . . . 3 3 0

108 • Escact records should be kept on file of the equipment issued to students, end students should sign for such equip* sent • « » « • # » » . • • • » 3 ' 5 0

109 • Students who loan articles of clothing or equipment to other persons should be liable to lots of physical education credit and forfeiture of gym-nasium locker and basket privileges . 0 • 0 | 0

Ill# to inventory of physical education equipment .should be made twice annually : z s : 0

113* Matt should not be dragged over the floor 0 : 0 • 0

IIS* All gpanaeiujB apparatus should be tested for safety at least twice m year 0 0 : 0

49

TABLE 8-

Hatings

Standards

: ##$ * ! ft 9 *H & : J* '*0 E»JJ3

jM.

w * S a. •rt ® ir» fiS

'• * o * *

4 m o o, * ®

l&sfcetst Lockers, tad Locker looms

Hi* If a basket system is used, suffi-cient lockers should be provided to accomodate the greatest number of stu-dents (peak load! participating in act-fer-ities at any on© time 3 3 0

119 • Equipment baskets should be kept on a rack in a basket or equipment j*@o® in charge of ©n attendant . * , 3 3 0

180# Where equipment baskets are pro-vided, the student should obtain the basket, dress in a clean uniform, deposit street clothes and basket in a 1

looter while participating, and finally < mtmm. the basket and soiled equip-ment to the attendant, • • . # . 3 3 0

1S1* Clean unifoim® (costumes) Should be kept in the baskets, and soiled equipment should be sent to the laun-dry imaediately. 0 • 0 0

122• 2a institutions where the basket system is not in use, the department' of physical education should provide a sufficient number of lockers to accommodate all students who desire to participate in activities . . . . 0 0 ; 0

IBS# Double typ® lockers should be at : least 12 x lg x 36 inches in size. . 0 0 0

X8S» Locker rooms should be kept at a temperature of approximately 70 degrees when in use . 3

9 1 0

m

According to the data in fable 8, the physical educa-

tion program and the physical education department of • -

Arlington State College have a rating of 9 ©a three out

©f the foar standards for fields and courts: Standards

89, 9ft, and 99, fhe physical education program of the

college has a rating of 3 on Standard 88, while the physi-

cal education department has a 0 rating. The R.O.T.C.

department of the college has a © rating ©n all ©f the

standards.

In the-section ©n uniforms and towels, the physical

education program and the physical education department

have a rating of $ on Standard 106, while both have a

rating of 0 on Standard 105. The R.Q.f.C. has a 0 rating

on both the standards In this section.

In the purchase and tar® of equipment, the physical

education program and the physical education department ,

of the college have a 9 rating on Standards 10? and 106

and a rating of 8 on Standard 111. Both of these phases

of the study have a 0 rating ©n Standards 109, 119, and

115. fhe R.G.T.C. department has a 0 rating on all of

the standards.

SI

titation g£ GvumaslUBu —Three items are included in

the standards sat up by Hughes for sanitation of the gym*

nasium in a college physical education program, These items

and the ratings given the three phases of the study on the®

at Arlington Stat® College are shorn to fable 9.

t m m 9

FOE SAXRATXOlf OF GIMIASXUM H 4 COLLEGE PHYSICAL EDUCATION PBOGBAM AHD THE 8XXBST TO WHIGH THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION PROGRAK, THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION DEPABTMEHT AND THE R*0*T»C* DEPAHTWE8X Of ARLMT'ON STATE

COLLEGE MEET THE STAHDABDS

Ratings

Standards

iji #

* g> : ft|

ft ;

jd «& m m

o r 'fly *

V A is! J? $! gj j? »o • si pi

•"r o * •

:|H4* • # - C3& : * #

, us* £3

188. The gymnasium floor Should be swept daily with sweeping compound or other similar material , . . . . a 3 0

191*. Oymasiwt# looter, toilet, train* ing# sad shower room floors and locker room benches should be thoroughly cleaned with hot water and soap and disinfected daily • • • » • > « 0 0 0

193* Receptacles for running water for purposes of expectoration should be : conveniently placed In the gymnasium. © 0 0

§2

According to the date In Tabls 9, the. physical educa-

tion program and the physical education department of

Arlington Stat® College with a 3 rating very- satisfactorily

meet Standard 168. They both have a 0 rating on Btandards

191 and 195. The R.0.-T.C. department of the college has a

0 rating on all three itaadards.

Finances «»«T*o ite»t are included In the standards for

finances for a college physical education program. The

first of these lt«s§ reads as followsi

194. Physics! education should be operated on a budget

?lan and financed by general fund# appropriated by 1ft he institution and raised by taxation or endowssent.

*

The physical education program and the physical education

department of Arlington State College, with a rating of 5,

very satisfactorily meet the standard. The H.Q.T.C. depart-

ment of the college has a o rating on the standard,

the second item for finane© is as follows ?

195. If an appropriation for physical education is not available, a student fee should be charged for the physical education program.•L±

An appropriation is available for meeting this standard at

Arlington State College. The physical education program

and the physical education department, therefore, have a

9 rating on the standard. The H.Q.T.C. department of the

college has a 0 rating. 10lbid.» p* S9.

UIbld.. p. 89.

S3

Military Selene# Tactics*—One item Is included

In the standards set up by Hughes for a college physical

education program. this item reads as follows:

199* Military science and tactics should not be considered as a part of or as a substitute for physical education*^

Military science tod tactic® Is considered a substi-

tute for physical education for the boys at Arlington

State College, and the boys who are in the a.O.T.C. depart-

ment do not participate in physical education activities.

AII three phases ©f the study at Arlington State College,

therefore, have a 0 rating on this item.

XII* Jntraanaral Athletics

A number of standards were set up by Hughes for intra-

mural athletics. These were divided into organization and

staff, facilities and equipwmt, program of activities,,

schedules, requirements, protests, awards, budget, publicity,

and record®.

Organization §a4 §£§££•—three items are included in

the standard® for organisation and staff of an Intramural

athletics program at the college level* These items and

the ratings each phase of the study has on them are shown in

fable 10»

18Ibid.» p. 90.

S4

flllS 10

STANDARDS FOB OBGABIZATIOS AND STAFF OF A COLLEGE INTRAMURAL MSEIMIQ PROGRAM AID THE EXTMT TO WHICH THE PHI3IGAL EDUCATION PROGRAM. THE PHYSICAL EDtJCATIOR DEPAIWM^

AHD THE R.O.T.C. BSFAMMSff OP ARLINGTON STATE COLLEGE MSEC THE STANDARDS

Ratings

Standards

d**1 m m

£s |Ptf

. JQ IQ,

* •O

# •

« M> O p) • 0

1* Intramural athletics should be con-sidered a part of physical education and should he wider the control of that department 3 3 0

9, The director of intramural athletics ihonM act as a higher court of appeals on disputed questions which the student intraaural council cannot decide. * . . 5 3

: 0

IB* Qhlt managers should he elected or appointed by their o n group to act as ; intermediaries between the office and their respective teams 3 : 3 : 0

According to the data in Table 10, the physical education

program, and the physical education department of the Arling-

ton Stat® College have a 5 rating on all three of the standards

for organization and staff of a college intramural athletics

program. This indicates that all three standards are very

satisfactorily met* The B.O.T.C. department of the college

a 0 rating ©» all three standards.

53

Faollltlae Brolpment.—Ihree itsas ara included In

the standards set up by Hughes for facilities and equipment

for a college intramural athletics program# Shese items and

the ratings the three plates of the study have on them are

shorn in Table 11*

*P&TKTW !*t XIU3 JUD JUL

SAMMMS FOR FACILITIES AID EQUIPMENT OF A COLLEGE IMTM* MUM.L MTMIMXCB PROGRAM AMD TIE SXISX fO WHICH IBS! PHYSICAL EDUCATION PHOGBAM, XHE PHYSICAL EBOCAXHM

BlPABSMIif f AID XHS B.Q.T.C, CIFATOffiSf OF ARLINGTON SXATE COLLEGE MEEF THE S M A K B 8

Standards

Mings

i—) • cd o O P* •H P-» to

H -P c d -O Q, •H 0)

*

& «d •feLFfl

o • • EH -P O f t

Qg cjl

28. Xhe institution should provide spe-cial facilities for intradural athletics or arrangements whereby present facili-ties are assigned to intramural athlefctes at certain hows m designated days * . 30* totraarural playing equipment, such as halls, hats, fields, etc., should be provided by the department

31* Participants should be expected to furnish personal equipment, except in saeh activities as football, where the department should be- responsible for properly protecting the students « • •

5

3

0

0

According to the data in fable 11, the physical education

program and the physical education department of Arlington State

College have a rating of $ on all three of the included stand-

ards for facilities and equipment for a college intraarural ath-

letics program, Xhls indicates that the standards are met in

5$

la a very satisfactory maimer, The R.O.T.C. department of

the college has a 0 rating on all three of the standards.

Program o£ Aetlvitlea.items are included in the

standaMs set up by Hughes for the program of activities for

a college physical education program. These items and the

ratings the three phases ©f the study at Arlington State Col-

leg® have on then are shown in fable IS.

TABLE 12

M M M M A FOE A PROGRAM OF ACTIVITIES W A COLLEGE ® I M ~ MORAL AIHU8TIC3 PROGBAM AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH Til PHYSICAL SmJCATIOH PROORAM, TIE PHYSICAL EDUCATION

DEPARTMENT, AHD THE R.O.T.C. DEPARTMENT OF ARLINGTON STATS COLLEGE MEET THE SBHDARDS

Standards

St* All, statists should fee required to undergo the health examination and re-ceive the physician's permit before they are permitted to participate ia intra* ®ural athletics . ,

35. Team games should be included . . 36. Managers or some other designated persons should be responsible for cteck-ing out equipment and collecting It after contests are completed . . . . 3?. Individual "carry over" sports should be included 41*, Activities should be suited to the facilities available •- • - . 42. Activities should be physically wholesome (vigorous i not too strenuous j safe for the novice) .• . . . . . 43. Activities should be,interesting to students* • * . • . • » * • •

e o.

O A,

OS

Ratings

0

3

a

3

3

5

3

0

3

3

3

3

3

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

57

According to the data In Table 12, the physical eduea*

tton program and the physical education department of Arling-

ton Stat©- College have a rating of 3 on five of the standards,

35, 36, 37, 41* 42, 43. The college does not require a physi-

cal eaesaination of students before they are permitted to par-

ticipate in intradural athletics, to that tooth of these phases

of the study have & 0 rating on Standard 32. The E.G.T.C.

department of the college has a rating of 0 on all the stand-

ards.

Schedules* —Eight items are Included in the standards

set up for schedules in a college intramural athletics pro-

gram, These items and the ratings the three phases of the

study at Arlington State College on the© are shorn in Table 13.

According to the data in Table 13, the physical educa*

tion program and the physical education department of Arling-

ton State College, with a rating of 3, very satisfactorily

meet the standards for seven of the items, on schedules, 51,

S3, 55, $0, 67, Si, and 74. The college does not require

participants in intradural football, cross country, boxing,

or wrestling to go through a conditioning routine. The physi-

cal education program and the physical education department,

therefore, have a 0 rating on Standard 71, The R.O.T.C.

department of the college has a 0 rating on all the stand-

ards.

TABLE 13

M A D S FOB SCHEDULES FOR A COLLEGE INTRAMURAL ATHLETICS PROGRAM AID THE EXTENT TO WICH ZSS PHYSICAL EOTCATIGH

PROGRAM, Till PHYSICAL EPOCAf Id DSMBXKEIf, AID' TBI R.G.T.C. DBPASTMfflT Of ARLIKGTGK STATE

COLLSOE MEET THE STANDARDS

Standards

Ratings

o g-4 4* • * O P* « 0*

51. Complete schedules should be made before the season bagias and gaaes or events should fee played on days sched-uled sad at the time designated . . *

53* The original number of contestants in m elimination should equal a per* feet power of two* If the entry number is not a perfect power of two,, only enough games should toe played is the first round to reduce the entries to power of tm for the second round

55. The total nuaber of games needed in m round robin schedule in which all eoa-petitors meet each other should be

fetemined by the following formula: . MaM- where I represents the number of «iSes .. .. ,, .. .. .. #. . .• *•

60. All intradural participants should be required to pass the health examin-ation and receive a permit from the physician , . . . .

67. Students should not be permitted to transfer fro® one intramural unit or organization to another during a sport

# m . # - * « * - * * - * * •

68. Clubs, churches, etc.,,should be represented only by active members . . 3 71. Students should not be permitted to participate in intramural football,cross country,. boxing,. or wrestling without having gone through a conditioning matte 74. Final entry date for all intramural | activities should be- knom to students 1 3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

59

Four items ape included in the standards set

up by Hughes for protests in a college intramural athletics

program. These items and the ratings the three phases of the

study at Arlington State College are shorn to fable 14*

XJU3I3 14 „ •'

m A M m m s for protests m a colisoe ihtb&mjml athletics PROGRAM MD THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE FHXBICAL EDUCATION PROGRAM, THE PHYSICAL SIRJCATIOII DIPAWM£Wt AHD THE R.0»T«.C» DEPARTMENT OF ARL2BOSOR STATE COLLEGE

MEET THE STANDARDS

Ratings

standard#

$*$ * 4t P « tu

l i t p

I s

sff

NJ?

K «d i ,r " W T "

"""" W :o S4 • • 4> 0* * ft « jr

77. Protests should not be based on the Judgement of officials but upon such facts as mistakes to the fules . . . s * 0 83. forfeitures should be definitely discouraged by the department . . . 8 3 0

84* An intrsMural team should b© re-quired to forfeit and contest in which it uses an ineligible player. . * . : 3 3 0

86. The program of events at the insti-tution should be carefully studied be-fore the intramural schedules are made out to avoid conflicts and postpone-ments • • • « » • « • • . * 3 3 0

As shoiai in Table 14* the physical education program and

the physical education department of Arlington State College,

with a rating ©f 3* very satisfactorily meet all the standards

for protests to a college intradural athletics program. The

R»0,T»C« department of the college has a o rating on all the

standards*

60

A«M8***fwo items mm included In the standards set up

by Hughes for awards In a college intramural athletics program,

S© awards are given, by Arlington State College for achievements

in tli© college intramural athletics program and all phases of

the study, therefore, did not meet the standards for such

awards#

Budget#—One item was included in the standards set by

Hughes for budget financing of a college intrsmural athletics

program. This item reads as follows?

93. Intramural athletics should be run on a budget basis with funds appropriated by the institution for physical education.!®

the physical education program and the physical education

department of Arlington State College» with a rating of 3»

met this standard in a very satisfactory my. The R»0»T.C»

department of the college has a 0 rating on the standard.

Publicity»»~Fttblicity is an Integral part of a college

intramural athletics program. One item was included in the

standards set up by Hughes for such as program. It reads as

follows t

95» The intradural department should keep in touch with the various teams and players byweans of an intraMural column in the - school paper, circular

bulletin tions, etc.M notices, bulletin boards, and telephone ooaanunica

the physical education program and the physical education

department of Arlington State College have a rating of 3 on

13 I M a < < 1Q4. ^Ibld.. P. 104,

61

tills Item awl meet the standard very satisfactorily. The

H*0*T«C • department of the college has a 0 Kiting on the

standard.

Records.--Records aye also an important part of any col-

lege intramural athletics program. One Item on records was

included in the standards set up by Hughes for a college intra-

mural athletic® program, the item is as followsi

loir Detailed records of games by means of so©'re boota, scrap hooks, or typewritten sheet filed in cabinets or bound in permanent volume should be carefully kept by

the intramural manager or by secretarial help.Is

So permanent records are teept by Arlington State College of

intramural games. All three phases of the study, thereforw,

hare a 0 rating on the standard.

IV. Intercollegiate Athletics

Standards set up by the Hughes study for intercollegiate

athletics include those for organisation and staff, aim of

athletic policies, budget, equipment, accounting of receipts,

ticket sales, care of equipment, responsibility for injuries,

time for major games, courtesy to visiting teams, trips educa-

tional value of games, publicity, alumni, scholarship, and

employment for student athletes.

Organization §£& gta£|.—Seven items are included in the

standards for intercollegiate athletics. These items and the

ratings of each of the three phases of the study at Arlington

State College are shown to fable 15.

^IbM.. o.'no.

68

TABUS 15

SJAHBARDS FOR ORGANIZATION AID STAFF FOE INTERCOLjUSGIATE ATHLETICS AND TEE EXTEKT TO WHICH THE PHYSICAL E0JCAISR PROGRAM, THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION MPAHTMBlfT, ASB THE

R»OJ.C. DEPARTMENT OF ARLINGTON STATE COLLEGE MEET THE STAIDARSS

Standards

O ft

Ratings

o # * H4* . * *»

O ft «i is £r h

1* Intercollegiate athletics, if prop-erly conducted, should be recognized as possessing greet educational possibili-ties, and, therefore, should be organi-zed as a part of a broad program of physical education *

B0 All physical activities, including intercollegiate athletics, should be entered in one department under one mn desi®»ted as director of physical educa Lion • « « « * « • « » »

9* Final control of athletics should be vested in the president and board of trustees

M » All student athletic managers sfaouQA be scholastieally eligible or else be automatically removed fro® office *

16. Athletic coaches who have had the requisite academic training should be granted the seme faculty rating as sii4~ lar training would command in other depts 17# Athletic coaches should be nominated by the director of the department with the advice of the athletic committee, reccimaended by the president,officially-appointed by the board of trustees • 28» All athletic training should be under the direct supervision of a physician, preferably the director of health ©duca tion or a physician from the health education staff « «• , . r •• .. •

£ g 0

3

5

3

3

0

0

0

3

£

m

According to the- data in fable 15, the physical educa-

tion program and the physical education department of Arling-

ton State College have a rating of 3 on five of the seven

standards, B, 3, 14, 16, and 17. This indicates that they

bare met the standards in a very satisfactory manner. They

have a rating of 2 on Standards 1 and 22. The R.O.T.C.

department of the college has a rating of 0 on all of the

standards.

Ada g£ athletic policies*--One item was included in

the standards set up toy Hughes for the ai® of athletio poli-

cies. This item reads as followss

24. Athletic policies should be shaped with the idea of the welfare of the students in mind rather than for financial profits.16

The physical education and the physical education department

of Arlington State College have a 3 rating on this item

which indicates that it is very satisfactorily met. The

R.O.T.C. department of the college has an 0 rating on the

standard.

According to the data in Table 16, the physical educa-

tion program and the physical education department of Arling-

ton State College, -with a rating of 3 on ©tell standard, very

satisfactorily meets all of them. The R.O.T.C. department

of the college has a 0 rating on all the standards*

16Ibid., p* 111.

64

TABLE 16

StAHDARDS FOR SQUIPKSST FOE XfiTB!GOLI£GlATE ATHLETICS ASP THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION HID®* THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION DEPAHTMEUT, AND THE R.C.T*C.

DEPARTMENT OF ARLINGTON STATE COLLEGE MEET THE S M BARBS

Standards

Eatings

o j «h i m b

mtr m &* *h f It M*tf 0* if

u • *

# *

O A elil

33^ Quality* price, and service should It® considered in buying new equipment .

34* Equipment should conform to specifi-cations, should be official, should to© suitable for the service for which it is intended and the price should be con-sistent with market conditions • # «

36# Before placing an order for new equipment the director should take an inventory of the stock on hand, then send a requisition blank, properly filled out, to the purchasing agent for the equipment needed

39. Inside discounts, concessions, and special terns should fee avoided in purchasing athletic equipment • . .

3 3 0

3 0

3 3

Finances.--Two items were included by Hughes in the

standards for intercollegiate athletics* The first one reads

as follows:

86. All large bills incurred in athletics should be paid by the university treasurer.17

17 » , P- 11*.

65

Til® physical education program and the physical education

department of Arlington State College have a rating of 3

on Standard 86, and therefore, meet the standard satisfac-

torily, The R^0«T»C» department of the college has a 0

rating on the standard.

The second standard in finances for intercollegiate

athletics reads as followsi

31. The bases for estimating expenditures in pre-paring the budget should be as follows: Past expenditures (2 to 10 years) Changes in prices of materials and services Existing salary schedule Increase or decrease in enrollment Improvements made or contemplated Examination of past expenditures for waste Heeds of the program and schedule adopted18

She physical education program and the physical education

department of Arlington State College have a 5 rating on

the standard and meet it satisfactorily. The H.0..T.C.

department of the college has a 0 rating on the standard.

Equipment * —Four items were included by Hughes In the

standards for intercollegiate athletics. The items and the

rating ©f the three ptoses of the study on them are shown

in Table 18*

Accounting* —Six items were included by Hughes in

the standards for accounting in intercollegiate athletics.

These items and the ratings that the three phases of the study

at Arlington State College have on them are shown in Table 17.

P- 113.

66

TABLE 1?

STANDARDS FOR ACCOUHTXHO FOR ESTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS AMD m m a a t to which TIE physical mmiktim m o m . the

PHYSICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENTt AID TBS R.Q.T.C. DEPARTMEUT OF ABLISGTGM STATE COLIffll

MEET THE STANDARDS

Ratings

Standards

rr# "" • M €

w . m *

tt % Jf

is fmi P|'

#

o • * *4 4* a if O- Pit

§0* The system of athletic accounting I M S provide an official set of accounts snowing all items of income amI t^ease s 3 0

54. Collection ©f athletic receipts should he by central authority and com-plete accurate accounts of all income should b© kept » • * « * • » * 3 3 0

55. Record of athletic receipts should show all monies spent and for what purpose 3 3 0

56« It should be possible to trace every item of athletic expenditure from its origination to the final recording of it in the proper distribution ledger or ledgers 3 3 0

63. Financial statements showing the exact status of the accounts of the athletic department should he published at least annually . 3 <81 0

TO, Athletes should be paid for campus employment by the hour at the current uniform price for services actually rendered « « • • • > • • • • • 3 3 0

67

According to the data in fable 17, the physical education

program and the physical education department of Arlington Stat®

College have a rating ©f 3 m each ©f the standards as set up

in the table. This indicates that they mm% these standards

in a satisfactory manner. The R.Q.T.C. department of the col-

lege has a 0 rating cm all the standards.

Ticket sales.—Four items were included by Hughes in the

standards for ticket sales in intercollegiate athletics. These

Items and the ratings the three phases of the study at Arling-

ton State College have on them are shown in fable 18.

TABUS 18

STAHDARBS FOR TICKS SALES II IHTERCOLLBOIATE ATHLETICS AMD THE EXTEUT TO WHICH THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION PROGRAM, THE

PHYSICAL EDUCAIIQI DEPARTMENT, AKD THE H.O.T.C. MMMWMT OF arlimsrop state colisge

MEET THE STANDARDS

Standards C# |Qi§

Ratings

15. The business manager of athletics of the manager of ticket sales for ath-letic contests should be required to sign a receipt for all tickets pur-chased, giving quantity, price, and suitable description . . . . . . 77. Unsold tickets for athletic contests should be returned to the treasurer*s office and receipts should be issued for the® and preserved for the auditor*s.

Quantity, price, and suitable des-cription should be made ©f all athletic tickets returned to the treasurer . 79* A detailed report ©f ticket sales for athletic contests including all financial transactions involved should be aade to university business office and the director of athletics . . .

3

3

3

3

0

3

0

0

3

•«8

According to data in Table 18, the physical ©ducation

program and the physical education department of Arlington

State College- haw 6 rating of 3 on all the standards for

sales in intereollegiate athletics. This indicates

that the standards were set in a satisfactory manner. The 1.0.

T.C. department of the college has a © rating en all standards.

Car© g£ equipment. —Four items were included is the stan-

dards set up by Hughes for care of equipment in intercolle-

giate athletics. These items and. the rating the three phases

©f the study have on %hm are shorn in fable X9*

TABUS 1®

STANDARDS FOR 0A8E OF EQUIPMENT II DTEHCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS mD THE ARRSNT TO WHICH TIE PHYSICAL EBOCATIQH PROGRAM, m

PHYSICAL SIWCATIOI D1PABTWMT, AID THE R.O.T.C. DEPARTMENT OF ARLINGTON STATS COLLEGE

MEKE THE STAMDARDS

Standards

Sating*

Standards

' g**f »

8 8 w iff «H ftt JO <f*f ' K m. .

gf O Q, 1 4 JS <Gt E «

f O r • .« * O ft ' * # AS M

83# The custodian of athletic equipment should keep a record of all equipment issued • • # • • » • • • « • • 3 3 0 88. Damaged or soiled equipment should be returned to the stock clerk for re-pair or laundry . 5 . 3 0 92* Provision should be made for repairing damaged athletic equipment * ; 3 3 0 93* The invoice of athletic equipment should be made annually . . . . . 3 3 0

St

According to the data to Table 19, the physical education

program and the physical education department of Arlington State

College have a rating of 3 on all the standards included for

©are ©f equipment in intercollegiate athletics. This indicates

that all standards were satisfactorily met. The R.O.T.C.

department of the college has a 0 rating on all of the standards.

t m items were included by

Hughes in the standards for responsibility for Injuries receiv-

ed in intercollegiate athletics# The first of these items

reads as follows:

95. The policy of the athletic department regarding the responsibility for the reasonable ©are of athletic 1Q injuries should be definitely made toown to students.

The physical education and the physical education department

of Arlington State College have a rating of 3 on this standard,

which indicates that 'the conditions as set up are satisfac-

torily met. The R.Q.T».C» department of the college has a

rating of G on the standard.

the second standard in regard to injuries sustained in

Intercollegiate athletics reads as follows:

100. Any athlete with a head injury should be sent to the infirmary at once to remain for the night.20

the physical education program and the physical education

department of the college have a rating of 3 on this standard,

which indicates that it is met in a satisfactory manner. The

H.G.T.C* department of the college has a 0 rating on this Stan*

dard.

B t o ^ T T p T l H I ^ibid.. p. liae*

70

time for major games. —Or® item was Included in the stan-

dards as set up by Hughes for the time at which major games

should he played* The Item reads m followst

186, All aajor intercolleglate contests (those $ m m which attract wide student and public interest)

should he played m weekends.81

The physical education program and the physical education de-

partment of Arlington State College have a.rating of 3 on this

standard which indicates that it is met in a satisfactory man-

ner, The R.Q.T.C. department has a 0 rating on the standard. I M ftiiktoMl f,»f«--^o items mm included in

the standards set up for visiting teams in intercollegiate

athletics. The first item reads as followsj

135. A definite policy should be adopted regarding the courtesy accorded visiting athletic teaas and spectators.82

The physical education program and the physical education

department of Arlington State College haw a rating of 3 on

this standard. This indicates that th® practices of the col*

lege in this respect were satisfactoi^. Th© a.0»T.C» depart-

ment of the college has a G rating m this standard.

The second item la regard to courtesy to visiting teams

reads as follows?

136. Visiting athletic teams and officials should be infoimed well In advance as to time of contests, trans-portation facilities,, eating and sleeping accommodations,83

The physical education program and the physical education

department of Arlington State College have a rating of 3 on

the standard. This indicates that the standard is met i» a

11,1 " 186." * * * £ Z p. 1861:

71

satisfactory maimer# fhe R.O.T.C. department of the college

has a 0 rating on the standard.

Trips»—Five items were included in the standards set up

by Hughes for intercollegiate athletics. These items and tha

'ratings of the three phases of the study at Arlington State

Golleg® on them ore shorn in fable 20.

TABUS 80

STANDARDS FOR TRIPS IN INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS AND THE EXTENT f0' WHICH THE MUSICAL EDUCATION PROGRAM, THE PHYSICAL EDUCA* TICS® DEPARTMENT M B THE R.O.T.C. DEPARTMENT OF ARLINGTON

STATE COLLEGE MEET THE STANDARDS

1

Standards i §p :

I s j

• M » 0 m

M:*cf S m

o "w" • • i*4» o m «Jt

137. Arrangements, such as transporta-tion facilities, and eating and sleeping accommodations for trips of athletic teams should he made well in advance . 5 3 & J3i» Expense money for trips should he carefully accounted for 3 * i 0 140. Actual cash for trips should not he given members of athletic squads except under exceptional circumstances 5 3 0 145. fiie time of leaving on athletic trips should fee arranged with a view to reducing the absences from classes as much as possible. . 3 5 : 0 144. It should be clearly understood -that no items are to be charged to a hotel against an athletic team with-out the approval of the appropriate authorities . # . IS 3 0

Ratings

72

According to the data in Table 80t the physical education

program and the physical education department of Arlington

Stat©' College have a rating of 3 on all of the standards

included for trips in intercollegiate athletics. This indi-

cates that all standards are met in a satisfactory manner.

The R.0.T»C. department of the college has & 0 rating on all

the standards in Table SO*

Publicity*—Three items were included in the standards

set up by Hughes for publicity of intercollegiate athletics#

These items and the ratings the three phases of the study at

Arlington State College Mm on them are shown in Table 81.

TABLE SI

m m m n r n FOR PUBLICITY FOR MMCCLTBOXATE ATHLETICS mv THE EXTEWT TO WHICH THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION PROGRAM, THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, AID TEE B.O.T.C.

M W M M M T OF ARLINGTON STATE COLLEGE MEET THE STANDARDS

Standards

Batisgi

Standards

H • ©

O U (X,

m K • ,xs «M n%"8"—

H4» m *

O A •H © WO

pit jjg{

— * • —

o • » # * o A

146* Stphasis on intercollegiate games should depend upon their educational value to students and not solely upon

3 3 0 their public appeal or tradition , . 3 3 0

154. The institution should adopt an educational policy regarding athletic

a 3 0 publicity* . . « « . . . « * a 3 0

157. The institution should not pay sport writers for sport stories . 3 3 0

As shorn in Table 21, the physical education program and

the physical education department of Arlington State College

bare a rating of 3 on the standards for publicity of intercol-

legiate athletics. This indicates that the standards i«re met

in a satisfactory manner. The R.Q.T.C. department of the col*

lege M s & 0 rating on all the standards#

Assistance of needy student®. --Three items were included

in the standards set up by Hughes for assistance of needy stu-

dents to intercollegiate athletics* These items and the

ratings the three phases of the study at Arlington State Col-

lege hare on them are shown in Table ggiTatOe 23 suraerizes ratings.

TABLI ES

mmmms FOR ASSISTANCE OF SEEM srmmw m IMTSRCOLLKGIATE ATHLETICS MB THS EXTENT TO WHICH THE PHYSICAL 1WGATICM

PROGRAM, TEE PHYSICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, AND THS R*O.T.C* DEPARTMENT OF A R U M ® STATB COLLEGE

MEET THE STANDARDS

Standards

Ratings

«i U P* m

fit • « 04

at >% *

o * •

* m

S Q

171. The activities of all alumni and other institutional agencies, and of all individuals, toward the assistance of needy students should be officially recognized, merged and brought under the supervision of the proper university or college authorities . . . . . . .

IFS* Scholarships should be awarded on the basis of need regardless of athletic or intellectual ability . * . . 175. Employment for athletes should be secured through the same office and on the ssioe basis as it is secured for other students in the institution . . Z>

0

0

n

table 83

SUMMARY OF THE RATINGS, BY DIVISIONS, OF TIE STAKDARDS OP Til PHYSICAL EDUCATION PROGRAM, THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION DEPART-

MENT, M D THE R.O.T.C. DEPARTMENT OF ARLINGTON STATS COLLEGE

— mr$mi ,, fmsm, _ Plan Rating

lilal" 1

Possible Rating

; Rating : Total

"liii&ie" Bating.

: tereeaiage' 1 of Possible

Bating

Administrative Plan 3 % 2*000 &6.S7

Required Physical Education m 104 0*565 31.81

Intramural Athletics m 7S 0*400 ao.oo

Intercollegiate Athletics 138 110- • 8.950 98.48

fbiatis "Mi" "Sol"1""' "U¥|- '"l ' 11 *"

, Myaii sal. Education B@b&: rtment

Administrative Plan 3 • l 1.000 33.33

Required Physical Education 98 Q«&m ' 89.97

Intramural Athletics 90 78 8.400 SO.00

Intercollegiate Athletics uz 1357 2.886 96.70

Totals "'""fir"1""1" 298 ' i.ii® $3*^*' "

1 jt.O.T.C. Z> puartwiBi S ! .

Administrative Plan 3 0 0 0

Required Physical Education 587 3 O.OEQ 0.92

Intramural Athletics 90 0 0 0

Intercollegiate Athletics 138 0 0 0

J 'foliis" ' i iisg g ' ' 0.0054 J-WPJJ ,.MJ .JJU Ujan WAWMW

75

According to th@ data In fable 28, the physical educa-

tion program and the physical education department of Arling-

ton State College have a rating of 3 on all the standard®

Included for assistance of needy students in intercollegiate

athletics. This indicates that the standards are met in a

satisfactory maimer. The R.G.T.C. department of the college'

has a rating of 0 on all of the standards,.

Summary of Ratings

As a means of evaluating the prograa as a whole, a sum-

mary was made of the total possible ratings, the total ratings

made, the average rating* and the percentage ©f possible

ratings for each of the three phases of the study at Arling-

ton State College, these ratings are shown in fable £5#

According to the data in fable 23, the percentages of

possible ratings indicate the extent to which standard,s are

met. In the physical education program, the percentages of

possible rating for the different parts of the study were as

followst administrative plan, 66.67 j required physical educa-

tion, £1.31; intramural athletics, 30.00j intereollegiate

athletics* 93.48. The total possible rating is 53.97, which

indicates that the physical education progrsa meets essential

standards 53*97 percent.

The physical education department of the college has the

following percentages of possible' ratings; administrative plan,

76

33 *35 5 required physical education, 29*97} intraarur&l ath-

letics, 801 inte rcollegiate athletics, 96.7* The total

possible rating for the physical education department is

58*99, which Indicates that the department meets essential

standards 53.99 percent.

In the mo»T.C. department of Arlington State College,

the percentages to which it meets the essential standards

of a college physical education program is 0.55, a negli-

gible percent#

CmPfBK ?

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AID RE&GMMEND&TXONS

FOR FUTURE DEVBLOB5EST

Summary

The investigator undertook an evaluation of the physical

education program of Arlington State College by eismmining the

history and development of the college sine© Its establish-

ment as & state college in 1917• Special attention was paid

to those aspects of philosophy and practice which affected

the nature of the problem*

In undertaking this study,, the investigator had the

following purposes in mind t (1) to select evaluative

criteria by which the physical education program might be

effectively evaluated; (2) to evaluate the organization and

administration of the physical education programs (3) to

evaluate the activity, intramural and Intercollegiate pro-

grams; (4) to mate those recommendations for the future of

the physical education program as a whole which would imple-

ment its greater development*

The study was limited to the evaluation of the physical

education program of Arlington State College with recommenda-

tions for its future development. Sources employed in

gathering the data were both huaaan and documentary*

70

The following terms were used in this Investigation:

(!) Physical education is that part ©f education which pro-

ceeds by means of, or predominantly through, physical educa-

tion; (8) pfiys^l. n m M m W M W m to activity pro-

grams, professional courses In physical education, intramural

The plan of the study generally was t© proceed fro® a

review of the general history of Arlington State College to

a history of each phase of the physical education program,

and thence to an evaluation of the program. Such an evalua-

tion provided the liases for conclusions and recommendations X

for the future development.

M the initial chapter the purposes of the study, limi-

tations which restricted the investigator, sources of data,

procedure, organisation, and other basic considerations were

established#

Chapter II consists of a brief history of the general

development and growth of Arlington State College since its

founding.

Chapter III is a review of the general development of

the physical education department* Effects of the changes

in enrollment upon the progrsn were given special consider-

ation, as were the histories of the professional courses in

physical education, boys' physical education* girls* physi-

cal education, intramural athletics, and intercollegiate

79

athletics. Problems special to this particular program and

the esqplanation for their existence were discussed in each

division.

Chapter IT contains an evaluation of the entire prograa

©f physical education including the administrative plan,

required physical education, intradural athletics* and inter-

collegiate athletics.

Conclusions

From an analysis of the data of this study, the follow*

ing conclusions have been reached:

1. The entire program of physical education of Arlington

State College meets the essential standards of a college or

university physical education program to the extent of 54*0

percent#

B. the program of physical education is a@st nearly

satisfactory as to the essential standards in the divisions

of intercollegiate athletics (98,5 percent) and intramural

athletics (SO.O percent).

3. The pro grans of physical education is most deficient

in the division of required physical education (31.8 percent).

4. the department of physical education meets the essen-

tial standards of a physical education program to the extent

of 53.9 percent.

9* The department of physical education is most nearly

satisfactory as to the essential standards in the divisions

80

of intercollegiate athletics (96.7 percent) end intramural

athletics <60.0 percent}•

g# The department of physical education is most deficient

te the division of required physical education (29.9 percent).

7, The eietent to which the R.O.T.C. department meets the

essential standards of a college physical education program

1@ negligible (0*06 percent).

Recommendations for Future Development

the findings of this study indicate certain needs for

revision of the present program of physical education at

Arlington State College, Some of these are general in nature

and arise from the philosophy and policy of the institution;

others are specific in nature and have to do with aspects of

a purely practical nature. The history of the college indi-

cates that there has always been a youthful spirit present

in the administrative outlook. Flans for the future have

always been a part of the administrative thought and the col-

lege has never ceased to develop in many areas from year to

year# At the present time the philosophy of the college is

in a definite period of transition, and the change in thinking

will inevitably have many implications for the physical educa-

tion program, these recommendations, arrived at as a result

of this study, are a part of the whole picture of change.

1. It is most obvious that the R.O.T.C. program does not

aeet the needs of the students for physical education activities.

SI

Whatever benefits the student realizes •from the H»O.T.C» pro-

gram, and they are many, adequate physical education is not

one of then* Purposes of the two prognuss So not sufficiently

coincide* The H,O.T.C, program should not be considered as

any part of a substitute for physieal • education.

Z* Time should be reserved in the student*s schedule for

physical education.

S* Great expansion of the physical facilities for physi-

cal education is definitely needed. Separate plants for the

boys1 and girls' programs should be provided, with adequate

bathing and dressing provisions in each one.

4* A swimming pool on or near the main campus should be

made available•

5. It is essential that all students, male and female,

participating in the physical education program should be

given a physical examination by a physician.

6, Although there are now, and will continue to be,

many problems existing in connection with the intramural ath-

letics, the nature of the college being what it is, the pro-

gram should be made the object of continuing study and should

be altered from year to year to meet the needs and desires ©f

the students#

BIBUOGMPH!

Books

Hughes, William L., £&§, Education £02 itH M S t m m ^ J l ^ r s ^ M g t ^ J g

w £ ? £ v Ksi#iSSlffitlSai. Xeaehars College, Colombia, univer-sity, 1938.

Hughes, Willi® w p a | | B S ^ Kaugatlon to EaffigatM BMWfflW*** »«* IOM£« *• "• lames and company, 1WB*

lotiies* William L», aria Williams,. J» F.» gpfflftl § M IM|| supervision, Saw Tork, A* S. Barnes Company, 1942.

Voltmer, Mward F., end Esslinger, A# A.* | M

" • " • J t J B f e V W l S i B ' S S s s s f

The Wop^AImame and Boote g£ BSlS.# 1955» H w Yorlc» I e w Y o r k

Articles

Arlington State College, SSllMSMe 1^17-1952.

BlanchaM, Vaughn S. 4 "Adequate 1 HatoMr jquhUi il & H I I § m B u s H m # { G e t o b e r*

478-4M

Bogue, j. p#f «Junior College," Rational iSiSSSSMffi. Journal. XX3CfIt (April# 1947J|Wl»

Colver, C. C.t •Half Century of Junior College," | M IMISS. Qftiiotf* Journal. XVII (F@toru.ary, 194?),. 844-843*

Horing, Olive H., "Physical Education at Centenary f»£>* College," t&S. Junior iWftCT., d&HBSl* w CApril# 1954), 3*?$-S91»

Irwin, L. W.» -lew Directions in J§f 1946). journal t£ Health & & BTOf-fffl W H I <"•*• 1 9 4 6

E65-J369.

83

Jensen, Elizabeth J., "Physical Education for Women,w

imlSS 22BSS1. XX (November, 1931), 95-96.

MacLean, M. S., "What Constitutes an Adequate Junior College

Myers, Spencer i.r (Chairman), "3urvey on Athletic Practice 2a Junior College, Committee on Athletic Conditions,* the Junior Collide Journal, X <December, 1940), §51* I S j ir (May71944 ), l?l-l?7.

Havelle. Yearbook at Arlington State College# 1917-1953•

Sperling, A. P., "Standards in Physical Education," The Jo|rnal^of Jealth agd (Io?erober,

Vande Bogart, G. H., "Physical Education in the Junior Col-lege," I (February, 1931), 268*869,

Unpublished Materials

Hereford,, I. K., "Annual Report of Arlington State College,11

to Chairman ferns Education Association.

Ligon, 0. L»| "Physical Education in the Junior Colleges," Unpublished Master*s Thesis, The "diversity of Texas, Austin, August, 1958.

Tinkle, Mabelle, "Physical Education in the Junior College," Unpublished Master's Thesis, The University ©f Teas, Austin, June, 1932.