top trumps or trivial pursuit?: redefining the rules of political engagement in the age of web 2.0

21
Top Trumps or Trivial Pursuit? Redefining the Rules of Political Engagement in the Age of Web 2.0 Shefali Virkar Oxford Internet Institute/ Department of Politics and IR University of Oxford [email protected]

Upload: shefali-virkar

Post on 16-Nov-2015

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Virkar, S., ‘Top Trumps or Trivial Pursuit?: Redefining the Rules of Political Engagement in the Age of Web 2.0′. Paper presented at Internet Research 8.0: Let’s Play, Association of Internet Researchers, Vancouver (Canada), 12th – 17th October 2007.

TRANSCRIPT

  • Top Trumps or Trivial

    Pursuit? Redefining the

    Rules of Political

    Engagement in the Age of

    Web 2.0

    Shefali Virkar Oxford Internet Institute/

    Department of Politics and IR

    University of Oxford

    [email protected]

  • Young Citizens, Old Problems

    Increased questioning of traditional democratic politics in Western liberal democracies

    Growing political apathy and a broader disillusionment with political institutions, policies and actors - e.g. low voter turn-out.

    Particularly true amongst young people

    Are we seeing a crisis of democracy ?

  • Breaking Barriers to

    eGovernment

    Exploring eConsultation

    Initiatives in the European

    Union

  • e-Governance

    e-Government e-Democracy

    e-Engagement e-Voting

  • Category 1: Duration

    Long Term Consultations

    Long-lasting initiatives, not bound within any

    time-period

    Short Term Consultations

    Citizen opinions sought on key political

    events, during a specific period of time

    One-off Consultations

    Highly specialised, issue-based often ad hoc consultations

    Citizen reaction sought for current issues

    Come to a close once event ends / time-

    period is over

  • Category 2 : Level of Government

    Local Government

    National Government

    Regional Government/Pan European

    Initiatives

  • Category 3: Target Audience

    The General Public

    Participation invited from the general

    populace on a wide-ranging variety of issues

    Targeted / Special Interest Groups

    Feedback obtained for specific issues of

    immediate concern

    UK Parliamentary Consultations (such as

    FloodForum.net, Domestic Violence)

  • eConsultation in the

    United Kingdom

    The No.10 Downing Street

    ePetitions Initiative

  • An Introduction to Petitioning

    What is a petition? A formal request to a higher authority

    such as a Head of State or Parliament, signed by one or a number of citizens

    Traditionally paper-based

    Not meant to be representative of a countrys opinion

    Advent of Web 2.0: The Rise of the ePetition Different from conventional petitions only in

    the way signatures are collected and delivered

  • Petitioning in the United Kingdom

    Long-established convention of petitioning

    the Prime Minister

    Petitions traditionally submitted in person at

    the door of No.10

    Received a 21st century make-over: The PMs ePetitions Website launched in November

    2006

    Joint venture between the Prime Ministers Office and mySociety

  • ePetition Website: Key Features

    Home Page

    View recently submitted petitions, or

    petitions according to popularity ranking

    Create/Submit a Petition

    Petitioners create petitions using an

    ePetitions form Petitions must conform to certain

    standards set down in the Civil Service

    Code

    On average 1 in 6 petitions are rejected

    Sign a Petition

    Data Protection

    Once submitted, a petition may be signed by anyone accessing the site Feedback

    Petitioners email address used by the Government for providing feedback

    A maximum of two responses from

    Government to issues raised, and two

    replies by the petitioner Data held by mySociety and not by the

    PMO or any other Government agency

  • Advantages to ePetitioning

    The website allows for informed petitioning

    and a better quality of participation

    Easy to obtain background information

    before signing up

    Citizens able to research the finer points of

    an issue before deciding whether or not to

    support it

    Citizens receive feedback on the progress of

    their petition, once signed

  • From a Government standpoint, the initiative

    aids informed decision-making and better

    dialogue with citizens

    Popular petitions and citizen comments may

    be used during the policy process

    Extremely popular petitions may serve to

    highlight issues and uncover underlying

    discontents which have not yet been picked

    up by the media

  • New Opportunities, Old Problems

    Most petitions can be ignored by the Government without fear of retaliation

    Tendency for serious petitions to get mixed up with not-so-serious ones

    Government must strike a balance between the overarching democratic requirements of openness, accessibility and participation and the need to keep within stringent Data Protection standards

  • In addition, the initiative faces many old and well-known stumbling blocks, including:

    Political Apathy

    Lack of Publicly Available Information

    Selection of Participants

    Difficulties of Dealing with Expectations

    Problems of Digital and Social Exclusion

  • By combining traditional access to politics with technology ePetitions are a powerful way of making politicians aware of a section of public opinion

    However

    An ePetition itself simply indicates what one group of people think on a subject

    The ePetitions system is a direct replica of the traditional petitions model, and not a radically new democratic process

  • Exploring the Past, Present &

    Future of e-Democracy in the

    EU and Beyond

    Engaging the Public

  • Privacy and security issues

    The role of moderators in discussions

    The stage in the policymaking process at which consultations should be introduced

    New Issues, New Questions

    Remote user authentication to prevent fraud

    and identity theft

    Ability of process to generate trust and

    increase participation

    Danger that opinions which are outside of

    pre-defined parameters may be deliberately

    marginalised or excluded

  • Can Government 2.0 offer something radically different from Government 1.0?

    Will new forms of voter engagement like the ePetitions lead to changes in policy, or will entire exercises be quietly forgotten after any initial hype?

    Are there a fresh set of ways in which advances in Web technology may be applied to help bring communities together and enable government to deliver public services that meet personal, family and community choices?

  • Madrid Participa (Spain)

    Iperbole (Italy)

    Bristol City Council (UK)

    The No. 10 Downing

    Street ePetitions

    Website (UK)

    Tana Otsustan Mina

    (Estonia)

    The Scottish

    Parliamentary

    Initiative (UK)

    Your Voice in Europe

    (the European

    Commission)

    The City of

    Esslingen (Germany)

    Digital Administration

    Programme the

    Democracy Project

    (Denmark)

    Energy Technology

    Futures (Canada)

    Toute lEurope

    (based in France)

    The City Planning

    Commission of Kalix

    (Sweden)

    Online Parliamentary

    Inquiry into Domestic

    Violence (UK)

    FloodForum.net (UK)

    The Future of Food

    (Germany / the

    Netherlands)

    Local National Pan-European L

    on

    g

    Te

    rm

    Sh

    ort

    Te

    rm

    On

    e-o

    ff

  • Can Government 2.0 offer something radically different from Government 1.0?

    Will new forms of voter engagement like the ePetitions lead to changes in policy, or will entire exercises be quietly forgotten after any initial hype?

    Are there a fresh set of ways in which advances in Web technology may be applied to help bring communities together, create new spaces for constructive democratic interaction and enable government to deliver public services that meet personal, family and community choices?