toning up your shared services operation for elite performance
TRANSCRIPT
Toning up your shared services operation
for elite performance
….formalised service performance modelling to fit with your organisation
Ian McAllister March 2012
For today…….
The Nationwide Building Society
Finance Business Services
Interactive session: your views
Our model: the ‘HOW and the ‘WHAT’
Interactive session: how are you managing service performance
Key challenges and next steps
Risk management (if we have time)
Context
Service Performance modelling
In summary
Context: The Nationwide Building Society in numbers
165 years.…….experience - as a mutual
£190 billion....assets held - the world’s largest building society, UK’s largest mutual
£320 million…last reported profit (2011)
15 million..…..members – borrowers and savers
16,000……..….employees – in approximately 700 locations
180+…….………similar organisations – acquired or merged
1st………………..retail internet banking - introduction in the UK
8...………….……range of retail financial products – savings, mortgages, loans, investments etc..
♯2…………...…UK savings and mortgage provider
♯1…………...…for customer satisfaction (Financial Research Survey: February 2012)
Context: forming Finance Business Services (FBS)
• Nationwide transactional activities (mainly P2P and R2R) branded as ‘shared services’ but in reality are centralised accounting (and in another location)
• This shared services proposition:-
• a provider of Business Intelligence and other analytics to senior decision-makers
• focus is on delivering high quality, often complex outputs through a combination of efficient transactional activities and insight.
• Shared services as a business
• This story: how…..
• we intend to deliver on our proposition
• an embedded Service Performance Model (of any design) is equally effective for a range of shared services solutions
Business Customers
Service Performance [Model] Management
Finance Business Services
Group Financial
Planning and Analysis
Group Cost Management
Capital Management
Operational Cost
Management
[Product] Income and
Margin Management
Channel Performance Management
Board and Regulatory Business Partnering
Fin
anci
al P
erfo
rman
ce
Shar
ed S
ervi
ces
Context: Operating model for ‘Financial Performance’
Our Critical Success factors
Our Key Performance
Indicators (w-i-p)
Achieving the vision:
STRATEGY for 2012-3
Developing capability Creating opportunities Being accountable Recognising excellence
Continuously Improving Raising standards Best Operating Practice Embracing change
Raising Service levels Delivering on time, in full Developing partnerships Expanding range of services
Clear strategy Optimising automation Engage and support Re-engineer
Our Vision
Our Mission
To be a high performance shared services business
Delivering excellence to each customer first time, every time
•Viewpoint score •Absenteeism •Attrition rate •# PRIDE awards •Average PA score •% development plans in place
•SLA success rate - various •# Exceptions •Cost of rework
•LV7 downtime •P1 & P2 faults raised •SLA performance •Projects completed on time •% self-service application
Embed a structured and formalised way of working – Service Performance Model implementation Review our product and service offering – Service Performance Model implementation Review, optimise processes for delivery – FMT27 outcomes Review, modify organisational structure to support delivery – FBS aligned to process Focus on developing capability – people and systems
•Customer satisfaction •Process improvements •SLA performance •OTIF delivery
Finance Business Services: being organised as a ‘Business’
People Process Technology Service
Our Critical Success factors
Our Key Performance
Indicators (w-i-p)
Achieving the vision:
STRATEGY for 2012-3
Developing capability Creating opportunities Being accountable Recognising excellence
Continuously Improving Raising standards Best Operating Practice Embracing change
Raising Service levels Delivering on time, in full Developing partnerships Expanding range of services
Clear strategy Optimising automation Engage and support Re-engineer
Our Vision
Our Mission
To be a high performance shared services business
Delivering excellence to each customer first time, every time
•Viewpoint score •Absenteeism •Attrition rate •# PRIDE awards •Average PA score •% development plans in place
•SLA success rate - various •# Exceptions •Cost of rework
•LV7 downtime •P1 & P2 faults raised •SLA performance •Projects completed on time •% self-service application
Embed a structured and formalised way of working – Service Performance Model implementation Review our product and service offering – Service Performance Model implementation Review, optimise processes for delivery – FMT27 outcomes Review, modify organisational structure to support delivery – FBS aligned to process Focus on developing capability – people and systems
•Customer satisfaction •Process improvements •SLA performance •OTIF delivery
Finance Business Services: being organised as a ‘Business’
People Process Technology Service
Our Critical Success factors
Our Key Performance
Indicators (w-i-p)
Achieving the vision:
STRATEGY for 2012-3
Developing capability Creating opportunities Being accountable Recognising excellence
Continuously Improving Raising standards Best Operating Practice Embracing change
Raising Service levels Delivering on time, in full Developing partnerships Expanding range of services
Clear strategy Optimising automation Engage and support Re-engineer
Our Vision
Our Mission
To be a high performance shared services business
Delivering excellence to each customer first time, every time
•Viewpoint score •Absenteeism •Attrition rate •# PRIDE awards •Average PA score •% development plans in place
•SLA success rate - various •# Exceptions •Cost of rework
•LV7 downtime •P1 & P2 faults raised •SLA performance •Projects completed on time •% self-service application
Embed a structured and formalised way of working – Service Performance Model implementation Review our product and service offering – Service Performance Model implementation Review, optimise processes for delivery – FMT27 outcomes Review, modify organisational structure to support delivery – FBS aligned to process Focus on developing capability – people and systems
•Customer satisfaction •Process improvements •SLA performance •OTIF delivery
Finance Business Services: being organised as a ‘Business’
People Process Technology Service
Our Critical Success factors
Our Key Performance
Indicators (w-i-p)
Achieving the vision:
STRATEGY for 2012-3
Developing capability Creating opportunities Being accountable Recognising excellence
Continuously Improving Raising standards Best Operating Practice Embracing change
Raising Service levels Delivering on time, in full Developing partnerships Expanding range of services
Clear strategy Optimising automation Engage and support Re-engineer
Our Vision
Our Mission
To be a high performance shared services business
Delivering excellence to each customer first time, every time
•Viewpoint score •Absenteeism •Attrition rate •# PRIDE awards •Average PA score •% development plans in place
•SLA success rate - various •# Exceptions •Cost of rework
•LV7 downtime •P1 & P2 faults raised •SLA performance •Projects completed on time •% self-service application
Embed a structured and formalised way of working – Service Performance Model implementation Review our product and service offering – Service Performance Model implementation Review, optimise processes for delivery – FMT27 outcomes Review, modify organisational structure to support delivery – FBS aligned to process Focus on developing capability – people and systems
•Customer satisfaction •Process improvements •SLA performance •OTIF delivery
Finance Business Services: being organised as a ‘Business’
People Process Technology Service
Our Critical Success factors
Our Key Performance
Indicators (w-i-p)
Achieving the vision:
STRATEGY for 2012-3
Developing capability Creating opportunities Being accountable Recognising excellence
Continuously Improving Raising standards Best Operating Practice Embracing change
Raising Service levels Delivering on time, in full Developing partnerships Expanding range of services
Clear strategy Optimising automation Engage and support Re-engineer
Our Vision
Our Mission
To be a high performance shared services business
Delivering excellence to each customer first time, every time
•Viewpoint score •Absenteeism •Attrition rate •# PRIDE awards •Average PA score •% development plans in place
•SLA success rate - various •# Exceptions •Cost of rework
•LV7 downtime •P1 & P2 faults raised •SLA performance •Projects completed on time •% self-service application
Embed a structured and formalised way of working – Service Performance Model implementation Review our product and service offering – Service Performance Model implementation Review, optimise processes for delivery – FMT27 outcomes Review, modify organisational structure to support delivery – FBS aligned to process Focus on developing capability – people and systems
•Customer satisfaction •Process improvements •SLA performance •OTIF delivery
Finance Business Services: being organised as a ‘Business’
People Process Technology Service
Your views: what a Service Performance model looks like
Interactive session: at your tables……………..two questions: 1.What should ‘good look like’ for managing Service Performance
2.What do you think the benefits are of having a ‘model’
Our execution: 7 priorities, 5 workstreams
1. Support a business mindset………....vision, mission, critical success factors
2. Establish where we currently are….baselines
3. Monitor how we are performing…..scorecards
4. Set out our service promise………....service level agreements
5. Sustain a learning culture…………....exceptions management
6. Deliver performance………...............formal continuous improvement
7. Assist in managing priorities……..….self-managed teams
Something to………
Service Performance model: Execution through process excellence
• A bit of interactive ‘fun’………………….not scientific
• On the handout provided, we would like you to indicate where your shared services business is up to with regard to modelling ‘Service Performance’
• As we share the contents of this particular model, we would like you to score that progress as follows:
Score 0………………….not started, not applicable, not interested!! 1………………….thought about it, at the ideas stage, may implement 2………………….have a plan for implementation 3………………….currently implementing 4………………….fully implemented, still evolving 5………………….totally embedded
• We’ll total at the end
• Maximum score is…………110
• Would like to collect in at the end of the session, replies can be anonymous
Performance Measurement – process checklist
1. Baselines
Current transaction unit costs Expense ratios, budget performance Productivity measures Cost of exceptions
✔
2. Process metrics
Best practice in Shared Services Identify key processes for measurement Establish measures – link into SLA Agree internally and with customers Publication
✔
3. Internal Benchmarks
Establish contacts Agree benchmarks Measure and report Share and identify influences
✔
4. External Benchmarks
Establish contacts – Hackett, SSF Agree benchmarks Measure and report Share and identify influences
✔
5. Balanced Scorecard Best practice in Shared Services Design local scorecard Agree targets and implement
✔
6. Performance modelling Enable Performance Measurement processes Increased automation in production
✔
Service Performance model: Execution through process excellence
Establish where we currently are….
Measure process performance…….
Point of comparison if you can access them………………..
Powerful point of comparison if you can get them………………….
Report to stakeholders...................
Make it easy to execute……………….
So what…
Capability Development – process checklist
1. Organisational capability analysis
Evaluate current FBS status and structure Define end-state Gap analysis Fill through skills development
✔
2. People performance management systems
Job specification and competency profiles Development and retention programme Succession planning Reward and recognition process Improved use of existing tools e.g. Reviews/360 Resources for training and development Leverage the Capability Framework Leadership competency
✔
3. Employee surveys Viewpoint Action planning Accountability, progress monitoring and delivery
✔
4. Systems optimisation strategy
Communication/stakeholder management Training and awareness approach Protocols for development and initiatives Process for prioritisation of business as usual
✔
5. Formalised continuous improvement
A visible, well defined process Shared with customers and branded Incentivised Tracked benefits
✔
Service Performance model: Execution through process excellence
Establish the optimum delivery structure……………..
Develop our people……….....
Get the team’s perspective and act……………………………..
Leverage technology…………
Delivery, effectiveness, efficiency, differentiation……..
So what…
Customer Relationship Management – process checklist
1. Service Level Agreements
Agree Design Establish FBS service measures Establish customer reverse measures Set targets and Implement
✔
2. Voice of the customer Define who the customer is Customer review meetings Customer survey and managing feedback
✔
3. Products Definition
Agree what is to be delivered Product development – customer led Product development – FBS innovation Measure delivery and quality - insight
✔
4. Service Definition Agree when and how we deliver Measure delivery and quality Capability development
✔
5. Exceptions Management
Design process Communicate out Prototype Monitor , measure and action planning
✔
6. Communications strategy SLA requirements Relationship governance Exceptions processes
✔
7. CRM modelling Exceptions modelling Collecting and reporting SLA performance data
✔
Service Performance model: Execution through process excellence
Set out our service promise……
Get the customer view on a systematic basis……………………..
So what do we do…………………..
How should we deliver…..........
A sustainable learning culture….
Engagement at all levels………….
Make CRM easy to execute……..
So what…
Workload Management – process checklist
1. Activity Analysis
Create schedule of regular activities Review ad hoc requests Map out peaks and troughs Assess flexibility of resource Identify insight, focus on consistency Feed in to Capability Development process
✔
2. Hotspots (Communication cells)
work is effectively prioritised - urgency of the request, the importance to the customer
ensure fluctuations in the FBS workload are managed within the planned staffing levels
plan the allocation of work to individuals and teams in a timely manner.
consider the skills, competencies and preferences of individuals and teams
ensure the developmental needs of individuals and teams are catered for
✔
3. Activity Based Management
Use activity analysis Create activity cost analysis Feed in the unit cost calculation Examine cost sensitivity and impact of exceptions
✔
4. Charging mechanism
Research best practice Prototype FBS model Discuss potential impact with stakeholders
✔
Service Performance model: Execution through process excellence
Identify standard and ad hoc activity, establish baselines, focus effort on CI……………………………….
Develop a sense of team working and shared ownership, pro-active managment of issues on a systematic basis…………………….. Understanding cost of service, impact of re-working, basis for transaction unit costs
Influence behaviours…………
So what…
Challenges and next steps
• Challenges…..
• Winning hearts and minds – culture, ‘bit theoretical?’
• Choosing the ‘right model’ – priorities, delivery, resources, ‘fit’
• Implementation – timing, change management
• Sustainability - measurement systems, evolution, embed
• Next steps…..
JDI for superior shared services delivery (in my humble opinion…..)
Performance measurement Score
1. Baselines
2. Process metrics
3. Internal Benchmarks
4. External Benchmarks
5. Balanced Scorecard
6. Performance modelling
Maximum 30……….
Your Service Performance model: where are you up to?
Customer Relationship Management Score
1. Service Level Agreements
2. Voice of the customer
3. Products Definition
4. Service Definition
5. Exceptions Management
6. Communications strategy
7. CRM modelling
Maximum 35………….
Capability Development Score
1. Organisational capability analysis
2. People performance management systems
3. Employee surveys
4. Systems optimisation strategy
5. Formalised continuous improvement
Maximum 25……..
Workload Management Score
1. Activity analysis
2. Hotspots (Communication cells)
3. Activity Based Management
4. Charging mechanism
Maximum 20………..
Total
Score 0 - not started 1 - at the ideas stage, may implement 2 - have a plan for implementation
3 - currently implementing 4 - fully implemented, still evolving 5 - totally embedded
110
out of….
Being ‘organised’ as a ‘business’
Engage and enable the team
Embracing technology to
support service delivery
• Lack of organisational credibility • Low levels of ‘business-like behaviour’ • Inability to influence business customers • Ineffective communication
• Inappropriate technology selection • Incomplete implementation, lack of training • Under-utilisation of the functionality • Missing out on leveraging automation
• Lack of clarity of objectives, expectations • Absence of shared services leadership • Rewards systems are inadequate • Failure to act on employee feedback
• Baselining, bench-marking, scorecards • Leadership, objectives, CSF’s • Charging mechanisms • Communicated vision, strategy, mission
• Specification, competencies for all roles • Skills development strategies • Succession, retention, reward programme • Satisfaction surveys and positive actions
• High levels of automation, % self service • Fit for purpose systems, few side applications • Project management expertise • Defined relationship with IS organisation
Strategic themes
Potential risks of going off-track……..
Managing that risk……
Committed to process
excellence and ‘product’ quality
• Processes and controls not understood • Audit failure, reputation damaged • Ineffective change management • Lack of response, follow up on exceptions
• Documentation, standardisation, streamline • Formalised issues resolution, CI • Change control process and governance • Quality control, risk management focus
Developing partnerships,
focus on customers
• Lack of customer engagement • Non-compliance to agreed processes • Service and ‘product’ failures • Not leveraging the benefits from the SPM
• Well executed communications strategy • Defined and agreed services and products • Key performance indicators – duly managed • Customer Satisfaction Surveys – gain insight
Peop
le P
rocess
Techn
o
Service
Risk assessment: mitigating risk supported by the model