today’s topic do you believe in free will? why or why not?
TRANSCRIPT
Today’s Topic
Do you believe in free will?
Why or why not?
The “I Want More Pain” Experiment
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
A or B
The “I Want More Pain” Experiment
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
69% 31%
Memory or ExperienceWhich is more important?
How is this possible?
Remembered pain(RP)= (MAX+ENDING)/2
A– (RP=(7+1)/2=4)B- (RP=(7+7)/2=7)
Experienced pain= sum(pain)
Which should doctors minimize?
How do we choose what we choose?
u(x) : the subjective utility of x
E(x) : the expected subjective utility of x
E(x) = p(x) u(x)
p(x) : the probability of x
Lottery: 1/1000 odds, $500 prizeOn average, you win$500 for 1000 games= $0.50 per gameThat’s expected utility
E(c) : the expected subjective utility of choice c
E(c) = i p(oi) u(oi)
oi : the ith outcome of choice c
Calculating Expected Utility
What is my subjective expected utility of deciding toaudition for “The Real World”?
E(c) = p(o1) u(o1)How cool would it be to be on The Real World?
How likely am I to actually be chosen?
Calculating Expected Utility
What is my subjective expected utility of deciding toaudition for “The Real World”?
E(c) = p(o1) u(o1) + p(o2) u(o2)How cool would it be to be on The Real World?
How likely am I to actually be chosen?
Do I like interviews? equals 1: there will be an interview!
Calculating Expected Utility
What is my subjective expected utility of deciding toaudition for “The Real World”?
E(c) = p(o1) u(o1) + p(o2) u(o2)How cool would it be to be on The Real World?
How likely am I to actually be chosen?
Do I like interviews? equals 1: there will be an interview!
Being on “Real World” would be really cool, but youdon’t have a chance in heck, and you dislike interviews:
E(c) = 0.0001 * 10000 + 1 * (-8) = 2
Expected utility of staying home (no outcomes):E(c) = 0
Now, suppose you REALLY dislike interviews:E(c) = 0.0001 * 10000 + 1 * (-50) = -40
Rational Choice
These ideas are from Rational Choice Theory in Economics. “Rational consumers always maximize expected utility.”
But we can extend these ideas to choice behavior in general. “People always maximize subjective expected utility.”
But is this how people actually work?
If it is, people are faced with two problems: We often don’t know how probably outcomes are Utility of outcomes often depends on other outcomes
For Example: E(being in class) = p(passing) * E(passing) E(passing) = p(graduating) * E(graduating) E(graduating) = p(getting good job) * E(getting good job) …..
chaining principle
Semi-Rational Choice
Lets assume: People want to maximize subjective expected utility, but they can’t (too much computation, too many unknowns)
What do people do? People make educated guesses (i.e. use heuristics) to estimate utility and probability values.
Psychologically, there are two critical questions:
How do we decide how good something is? (utility) How do we decide how likely something is? (probability)
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
subjective utility
losses gains
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
subjective utility
losses gains$100 $500 $1000$-100$-500$-1000
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
subjective utility
losses gains$100 $500 $1000$-100$-500$-1000
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
subjective utility
losses gains$100 $500 $1000$-100$-500$-1000
risk aversion:100% chance to get $100,50% chance to get $200
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
subjective utility
losses gains$100 $500 $1000$-100$-500$-1000
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
subjective utility
losses gains$100 $500 $1000$-100$-500$-1000
loss aversion
In Class Experiment - Framing Effects
• There is an outbreak of a disease that’s expected to kill 600 people. Two plans have been proposed to deal with the disease– Plan A: 200 people will be saved
– Plan B: 1/3 chance that 600 will be saved
– 2/3 chance that 0 will be saved
In Class Experiment - Framing Effects
• There is an outbreak of a disease that’s expected to kill 600 people. Two plans have been proposed to deal with the disease– Plan A: 400 people will die
– Plan B: 1/3 chance that 0 will die
– 2/3 chance that 600 will die
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
Framing Effects
Assume you are richer by $300. Choose between:• a sure gain of $100• a 50% chance gain of $200, 50% chance no change
Assume you are richer by $500. Choose between:• a sure loss of $100• a 50% chance loss of $200, 50% chance no change
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
Framing Effects
Assume you are richer by $300. Choose between:• a sure gain of $100• a 50% chance gain of $200, 50% chance no change
Assume you are richer by $500. Choose between:• a sure loss of $100• a 50% chance loss of $200, 50% chance no change
+ $400
+ $500 or $300
+ $400
+ $300 or $500
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
subjective utility
losses gains$100 $500 $1000$-100$-500$-1000
Framing Effects
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
subjective utility
losses gains$100 $500 $1000$-100$-500$-1000
Framing Effects
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
subjective utility
losses gains$100 $500 $1000$-100$-500$-1000
Framing Effects: Choose a sure gain
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
subjective utility
losses gains$100 $500 $1000$-100$-500$-1000
Framing Effects: Choose a sure gain
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
subjective utility
losses gains$100 $500 $1000$-100$-500$-1000
Framing Effects: Choose a sure gain Choose risk for a loss
Utility
How do we decide how good something is?
subjective utility
losses gains$100 $500 $1000$-100$-500$-1000
loss aversion• leads to trade aversion• maintaining the status quo
Probability
How do we decide how likely something is? Representativeness: Something is likely to the extent that it is familiar.
Representativeness
Linda is a 31 year old, single, outspoken, and very bright.She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeplyconcerned with issues of discrimination and social justice,and also participated in antiuclear demonstrations.
Please rank the following by their probability, with 1for the most probable and 6 for the least probable.
A) Linda is a university professorB) Linda is an insurance salespersonC) Linda is a bank tellerD) Linda is an owner of a book storeE) Linda is a single mom and takes classes at night schoolF) Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement
Representativeness
Linda is a 31 year old, single, outspoken, and very bright.She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeplyconcerned with issues of discrimination and social justice,and also participated in antiuclear demonstrations.
Please rank the following by their probability, with 1for the most probable and 6 for the least probable.
A) Linda is a university professorB) Linda is an insurance salespersonC) Linda is a bank tellerD) Linda is an owner of a book storeE) Linda is a single mom and takes classes at night schoolF) Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement
People rank F as more probable.According to probability,it can’t be: P(A&B) = P(A) * P(B)
Probability
How do we decide how likely something is? Representativeness: Something is likely to the extent that it is familiar. This leads to the conjunction fallacy.
RepresentativenessTom W. is of high intelligence, although lacking in true creativity. He has a need for order and clarity, and for neat and tidy systems in which every detail finds its appropriate place. His writing is rather dull and mechanical, occasionally enlivened by somewhat corney punsand flashes of imagination of the sci-fi type. He has a strong drive for competence. He seems to have little feel and sympathy for people, and does not enjoy interacting with others. Self-centered, he nonetheless has a deep moral sense.
This preceding personality sketch was written on the basis ofprojective tests Tom’s senior year in highschool. Tom iscurrently working
Is Tom more likely to be a salesman or a librarian?
Probability
How do we decide how likely something is? Representativeness: Something is likely to the extent that it is familiar. This leads to the conjunction fallacy, and to base rate beglect.
Probability
How do we decide how likely something is? Representativeness: Something is likely to the extent that it is familiar. This leads to the conjunction fallacy, and to base rate beglect. Availability: Something is likely to the extent that examples easily come to mind.
Availability
What is the probability that a major earthquake will strikethe U.S. in the next year and kill 1,000 people?0.1
What is the probability that a major earthquake will strikeCalifornia in the next year and kill 1,000 people?0.5
Probability
How do we decide how likely something is? Representativeness: Something is likely to the extent that it is familiar. This leads to the conjunction fallacy, and to base rate beglect. Availability: Something is likely to the extent that examples easily come to mind. This leads to the conjunction fallacy also, and people overestimate the probability of publicized events.
Conditional Probability Examples
• P (having a beard given that you are an american male)? P(B|M)? (1/50)
• P (being american male given that you have a beard)? P(M|B)? (99%?)
• P(an american taller than 6’4” given that you are in the NBA?) (98%)
• P(Being in the NBA given that you are an american taller than 6’4”?) (<1%)
Bayes’ Theorem
P(X) : the probability of XP(Y) : the probability of YP(X | Y) : the probability of X given that Y is trueP(Y | X) : the probability of Y given that X is true
Bayes Theorem converts P(X | Y) to P(Y | X).
P(X | Y) * P(Y)P(Y | X) = P(X)
Bayes’ Theorem
P(T) : the probability of being TallP(N) : the probability of being in the NBAP(T | N) : the probability of Tall given that Nba is trueP(N | T) : the probability of Nba given that Tall is true
Bayes Theorem converts P(T | N) to P(N | T).
P(T | N) * P(N)P(N | T) = P(T)
If Bob plays in the NBA, he is Probably Tall (>6’4”)
Bayes’ Theorem
If Bob plays in the NBA, he is Probably Tall (>6’4”)
0.98
P(T) : the probability of being TallP(N) : the probability of being in the NBAP(T | N) : the probability of T given that N is trueP(N | T) : the probability of N given that T is true
Bayes Theorem converts P(T | N) to P(N | T).
P(T | N) * P(N)P(N | T) = P(T)
Bayes’ Theorem
The probability that Bob is tallGiven that he is in the NBA is High
What is the probability that BobPlays in the NBA given that heIs Tall (>6’4”)
0.98
P(T) : the probability of being TallP(N) : the probability of being in the NBAP(T | N) : the probability of T given that N is trueP(N | T) : the probability of N given that T is true
Bayes Theorem converts P(T | N) to P(N | T).
P(T | N) * P(N)P(N | T) = P(T)
Bayes’ Theorem
The probability that Bob is tallGiven that he is in the NBA is High
What is the probability that BobPlays in the NBA given that heIs Tall (>6’4”)
0.98 0.00001
0.01
P(T) : the probability of being TallP(N) : the probability of being in the NBAP(T | N) : the probability of T given that N is trueP(N | T) : the probability of N given that T is true
Bayes Theorem converts P(T | N) to P(N | T).
P(T | N) * P(N)P(N | T) = P(T)
= .0000098/.01 = .001
A Picture might help
P(>6'4")
P(NBA)
Why is Base Rate Important?
• Need base rate to reason about conditional probabilities
• Base rate neglect: Failing to consider the base rates– A VERY COMMON ERROR -- even
among EXPERTS