to be filled by the ato training staff - accueil...direction générale de l’aviation civile...

Direction Générale de l’Aviation CivileDirection de la Sécurité de l’Aviation CivileDirection Personnels NavigantsPôle examens

DGAC/EASA - 08.2017 Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman75720 PARIS CEDEX 15

EASA-FCL Appendix 901/08

Ref

: 11

Form

exa

Applicant's name or licence number:If

ap

plic

able

, th

is f

orm

is

also

th

e ce

rtif

icat

e o

f co

mp

leti

on

of

the

trai

nin

g c

ours

e.

SE-SP(H)

ME-SP(H) SP

MP

Skill test:

ATPL(H)

IR Licence Skill test

Revalidation

Renewal

Operations:Type rating: Registration:

Revalidation

Renewal

Ski

llte

st

Pro

fici

ency

ch

eck:

TRAINING, SKILL TEST AND PROFICIENCY CHECK FOR ATPL, TYPE RATING, SINGLE/MULTI-PILOTE HELICOPTERES AND PROFICIENCY CHECK FOR IRs

Date of birth:

Type of licence held:

Licence number:

State of licence issue:Ap

plic

ant Last name(s)*:

First name(s)*:

ME-MP(H) Extension

IR-ME

1 Theoretical training for the issue of a type rating performed during period (if relevant)

From: To:

Mark obtained % (Pass mark 75%):

Signature of HT: Name(s)*:

2 FSTD (if relevant)

FSTD (aircraft type):

FSTD manufacturer:

FSTD operator: FSTD ID code:

Total training time at the controls:

Location and date:

Instructor: Signature of instructor:

Name(s)*:

3 Flight training:

Type of helicopter: Variant: Training flight time at the controls:

Training aerodromes or sites (take-offs, approaches and landings):

4 ATO informations

The ATO confirms that the candidate has been trained according to the approved syllabus and assures the level of proficiency required.

ATO name: Registration number:

Name of head of training*:

Location & date:

Signature of head of training & ATO stamp:

FI TRI Other:

TO B

E FI

LLED

BY

TH

E A

TO T

RA

ININ

G S

TAFF

Instructor: Signature of instructor:

Name(s)*:

FI TRI Other:

Training designation:

SFI STI

5 Skill test and proficiency check details:

Aerodrome or site:

Total flighttime:

Take-off time:

Landing time:

Pass Partial Pass**

Date of exam first attempt:

SIM or aircraft registration:

Examiner’s certificate number:

Fail**

I have received information from the applicant regarding his/her experience and instruction and found that experience and instruction complying with the applicable requirements in Part FCL.

I confirm that all the required manoeuvres and exercises have been completed as well as information on the verbal theorecal knowledge examination when applicable.

02/08

Applicant's name or licence number:Direction Générale de l’Aviation CivileDirection de la Sécurité de l’Aviation CivileDirection Personnels NavigantsPôle examens

DGAC/EASA - 08.2017 EASA Part FCL Appendix 9

Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile50 rue Henry Farman

75720 PARIS CEDEX 15

I confirm that in the event of a partial pass or fail I mustnot exercise the privileges of the rating until a full pass has been obtained.

Applicant name(s)* and signature:

*In capital letters:

In case of Partial Pass or Fail

6 Remarks

Pass Fail**

ATPL(H)

Ref

: 11

Form

exa

Date of exam second attempt:

IR

Pass Fail**

TR

Partial Pass**

Examiner’s certificate number:

Type and licence number :

Examiner’s name(s)* and signature:

I have received information from the applicant regarding his/her experience and instruction and found that experience and instruction complying with the applicable requirements in Part FCL.

I confirm that all the required manoeuvres and exercises have been completed as well as information on the verbal theorecalknowledge examination when applicable.

Examiner’s name(s)* and signature:

Total flight time:

Pass Fail**

Pass Fail**

Pass Fail**

**Give reasons and detail any further training, and mail this form to [email protected] :

Aerodrome or site:

SIM or aircraft registration:

Type and licence number :

European IR/PBN Pass Fail**

European IR/PBN Pass Fail**

I confirm that all requirements for validation of IR/PBN have been checked and completed according to the the instructions given on pages 3 and 4 of this form.

Validation of European IR/PBN

I confirm that all requirements for validation of IR/PBN have been checked and completed according to the the instructions given on pages 3 and 4 of this form.

Validation of European IR/PBN

Revalidation of type ratings : 2 Hours on relevant helicoptere type, check included (FCL.740.H(a)(2))

ATPL(H)

IR

TR

TRAI

NIN

G, S

KILL

TES

T AN

D P

RO

FIC

IEN

CY

CH

ECK

FOR

ATP

L, T

YPE

RAT

ING

, SIN

GLE

/MU

LTI-P

ILO

TE H

ELIC

OPT

ERES

AN

D P

RO

FIC

IEN

CY

CH

ECK

FOR

IRs




Ref

: 11

Form

exa

VALIDATION OF EUROPEAN IR/PBNINSTRUCTION TO EXAMINERSValid from 25/08/2017 until 25/08/2018

Introduction

Following the enforcement of EU 2016/539 regulation (training checking of pilots for PBN operations), the purpose of this note is to provide examiners (especially “non-French examiners”)with proper instruction to conduct the assessment of pilots holding an EASA licence administrated by France for transition to European IR/PBN.

It is reminded that European IR/PBN will be mandatory (and be recorded in the licence) to operate PBN classified airspaces or PBN approaches procedures latest from 25/08/2018.

The procedure described thereafter will enable examiners to deliver the European IR/PBN :

• to pilots having attended an EASA approved PBN course in an ATO, or

• to pilots holding a RNAV/GNSS course certificate provided by an EASA approved ATO or an European Airline (grandfathering procedure)

Procedure for Grandfathering

During the transition period (from 25/08/2017 until 25/08/2018) French licence holders are eligible for validation of European IR/PBN during their LPC, provided they :

1. can justify to their examiner having completed a RNAV/GNSS course by providing a certificate delivered by an EASA approved ATO or an European AOC operator,

2. answer to an 8 questions oral questionnaire during the briefing prior to the LPC session,

3. are assessed as competent when performing at least one 2D or one 3D approach based on GNSS during the flight/FSTD session of the LPC.

All 3 items above must be covered

Note 1: the certificate stated in (1) has no formal defined format. It must clearly state that the applicant has been trained (theoretical course + in-flight/FSTD training) in operating RNAV/GNSS procedures, especially RNP GNSS approaches (such training is mandatory as per ORO.FC.230 for airlines operating RNAV/GNSS approaches). Once checked, the certificate is to stay with the holder.

Preparation of the applicant for the oral questionnaire

It is highly advisable that applicants self-prepare themselves for the oral examination. For this purpose, they can study any updated and detailed document on the subject (the list of training objectives is detailed in AMC7 FCL.615(b) part “area navigation systems, RNAV/FMS”). Normally, knowledge and guidance included in the Operator Manual should be sufficient. Note that DGAC provides a comprehensive PBN guide (in French language) downloadable on:

https://www.ecologique-solidaire.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/Guide_exploitation_formation_PBN_Ed2_V0_novembre_16-1.pdf

Procedure for the validation of European IR/PBN for pilots not holding a RNAV/GNSS course certificate (not eligible for grandfathering)

These pilots must attend an approved PBN course in an EASA approved ATO (ground + flight/FSTD training + checking).




Ref

: 11

Form

exa

Paperwork to be completed by examiner for the validation of European IR/PBN

From 25/08/2017 and after having conducted the evaluation as described above (grandfathering procedure), the examiner shall either:

• Tick the corresponding box on the paper Training and Report Form for LPC, or

• For examiner having access to the internet system SIGEBEL, tick the corresponding box on the test record page.

Note: it is mandatory to use the latest version of the French TRF (training and report form) including the corresponding tick-box. It is downloadable on DGAC website.

Reminder: only examiners administrated by France are entitled to write on the licence of the holder of an EASA licence administrated by France (under conditions). Non-French examiners must only fill-in the TRF. The LPC and the PBN mention will be entered in the licence by a French licence officer.

Examiners entitled to conduct IR/PBN evaluationDuring the transition period (from 25/08/2017 until 25/08/2018), only EASA certified examiner are entitled to conduct the evaluation for validation of European IR/PBN and only if they:

• hold an European IR/PBN, or

• are trained in RNAV/GNSS procedures via the completion of a course provided by an EASA approved ATO or a European AOC operator

Revalidation of IR/PBN

Once validated, IR/PBN must be revalidated at each LPC by the successful completion of either one 2D or one 3D approach based on GNSS. The examiner shall confirm the revalidation by ticking the corresponding box on the paper or electronic report form.

Additional information to examiner concerning the oral questionnaire

Examiners are requested to ask 8 questions. Pass rate is 75% (6 good answers)

Questions must cover both theoretical aspects of RNAV/PBN (principles, parameters like accuracy, integrity, continuity, functionality, navigation specifications, designation of specifications especially the ones commonly used by the candidate in operations) and practical aspects (use of PBN, SOPs, MEL practice, associated NOTAMs, RNP APP technique, etc.). When preparing their questions, examiners can use the operator OM and/or official documents like AMC7 FCL.615(b) part “area navigation systems, RNAV/FMS” and ICAO doc 9613. French readers can usefully refer to the comprehensive document mentioned earlier in this note.


05/08

Ref

: 11

Form

exa

Applicant's name or licence number:

C. Specific requirements for the helicopter category

1. In case of skill test or proficiency check for type ratings and the ATPL the applicant shall pass sections 1 to 4 and 6 (as applicable) of the skill test or proficiency check. Failure in more than five items will require the applicant to take the entire test or check again. An applicant failing not more than five items shall take the failed items again. Failure in any item of the re-test or re-check or failure in any other items already passed will require the applicant to take the entire test or check again. All sections of the skill test or proficiency check shall be completed within 6 months.

2. In case of proficiency check for an IR the applicant shall pass section 5 of the proficiency check. Failure in more than three items will require the applicant to take the entire section 5 again. An applicant failing not more than three items shall take the failed items again. Failure in any item of the re-check or failure in any other items of section 5 already passed will require the applicant to take the entire check again.

FLIGHT TEST TOLERANCE 3. The applicant shall demonstrate the ability to: (a) operate the helicopter within its limitations; (b) complete all manoeuvres with smoothness and accuracy; (c) exercise good judgement and airmanship; (d) apply aeronautical knowledge; (e) maintain control of the helicopter at all times in such a manner that the successful outcome of a procedure or manoeuvre is never in doubt; (f) understand and apply crew coordination and incapacitation procedures, if applicable; and (g) communicate effectively with the other crew members, if applicable.

4. The following limits shall apply, corrected to make allowance for turbulent conditions and the handling qualities and performance of the helicopter used. (a) IFR flight limits Height: Generally ± 100 feet Starting a go-around at decision height/altitude ± 50 feet/- 0 feet Minimum descent height/altitude ± 50 feet/- 0 feet Tracking: On radio aids ± 5° 3D «angular» deviations half scale deflection, azimuth and glide path (e.g. LPV, ILS, MLS, GLS). 2D (LNAV) and 3D (LNAV/VNAV) «linear» deviation: cross track error/deviation shall normally be limited to ± 1/2 the RNP value associated with the procedure. Brief deviations from this standard up to a maximum of 1 times the RNP value are allowable. 3D lienar vertical deviaitons (e.g. RNP APCH (LNAV/VNAV) not more than - 75 feet below the vertical profile at any time, and not more using BaroVNAV): than + 75 feet above the vertical profile at or below 1 000 feet above aerodrome level. Heading: Normal operations ± 5° Abnormal operations/emergencies ± 10° Speed Generally ± 10 knots With simulated engine failure + 10 knots/- 5 knots (b) VFR flight limits Height: Generally ± 100 feet Heading: Normal operations ± 5° Abnormal operations/emergencies ± 10° Speed Generally ± 10 knots With simulated engine failure + 10 knots/- 5 knots Ground drift: T.O. hover I.G.E. ± 3 feet Landing ± 2 feet (with 0 feet reaward or lateral flight)

CONTENT OF THE TRAINING/SKILL TEST/PROFICIENCY CHECK GENERAL 5. The following symbols mean: P = Trained as PIC for the issue of a type rating for SPH or trained as PIC or Co-pilot and as PF and PNF for the issue of a type rating for MPH.

6. The practical training shall be conducted at least at the training equipment level shown as (P), or may be conducted up to any higher equipment level shown by the arrow. The following abbreviations are used to indicate the training equipment used: FFS = Full Flight Simulator FTD = Flight Training Device H = Helicopter

7. The starred items (*) shall be flown in actual or simulated IMC, only by applicants wishing to renew or revalidate an IR(H), or extend the privileges of that rating to another type. 8. Instrument flight procedures (section 5) shall be performed only by applicants wishing to renew or revalidate an IR(H) or extend the privileges of that rating to another type. An FFS or FTD 2/3 may be used for this purpose. 9. Where the letter ‘M’ appears in the skill test or proficiency check column this will indicate the mandatory exercise. 10. An FSTD shall be used for practical training and testing if the FSTD forms part of a type rating course. The following considerations will apply to the course: (i) the qualification of the FSTD as set out in Part-ARA and Part-ORA; (ii) the qualifications of the instructor and examiner; (iii) the amount of FSTD training provided on the course; (iv) the qualifications and previous experience in similar types of the pilot under training; and (v) the amount of supervised flying experience provided after the issue of the new type rating. MULTI-PILOT HELICOPTERS 11. Applicants for the skill test for the issue of the multi-pilot helicopter type rating and ATPL(H) shall take only sections 1 to 4 and, if applicable, section 6. 12. Applicants for the revalidation or renewal of the multi-pilot helicopter type rating proficiency check shall take only sections 1 to 4 and, if applicable, section 6.




Ref

: 11

Form

exa

Applicant's name or licence number:TR

AIN

ING

, SKI

LL T

EST

AND

PR

OFI

CIE

NC

Y C

HEC

K FO

R A

TPL,

TYP

E R

ATIN

G, S

ING

LE/M

ULT

I-PIL

OTE

HEL

ICO

PTER

ES A

ND

PR

OFI

CIE

NC

Y C

HEC

K FO

R IR

s

PRACTICAL TRAINING

ATPL/TYPE RATING

SKILL TEST OR PROF. CHECK

Manoeuvres/ProceduresNote : Training shall includeMCC for each item, if MPO

Instructor initials &

date training completed

Checked inFFS/H

FTD

1.1 Helicopter exterior visualinspection; location of each itemand purpose of inspection

P

1.2 Cockpit inspection

1.3 Starting procedures, radioand navigation equipment check,selection and setting of navigationand communication frequencies

1.4 Taxiing/air taxiing in compliance with air tra�c control or with instructions of instructor

1.5 Pre-take-o� proceduresand checks

2 attempt

FailPass

1 attempt

FailPassH

2.1 Take-o�s (various pro�les)

2.2 Sloping ground or crosswindtake-o�s & landings

2.3 Take-o� at maximum take-o�mass (actual or simulated maximum take-o�)

Pre-�ight preparations and checks

Insert examiner’s initials only

Flight manoeuvres and procedures

SECTION 2

2.4 Take-o� with simulatedengine failure shortly beforereaching TDP or DPATO

2.4.1 Take-o� with simulatedengine failure shortly afterreaching TDP or DPATO

2.6 Autorotative descent

Normal and abnormal operations of the following systems and procedures

SECTION 3

3.1 Engine

3.3 Pitot/static system

P

P

P

P

P

M

M

P

P

P

P

P

FFS

M (if performed in the helicopter)

M

M

M

M

M

2.5 Climbing and descendingturns to speci�ed headings P M

2.5.1 Turns with 30° bank, 180° to360° left and right, by solereference to instuments

P M

P M2.6.1 Autorotative landing (SEHonly) or power recovery P M

2.7 Landings, various pro�les P M

2.7.1 Go-around or landingfollowing simulated engine failurebefore LDP or DPBL

P M

2.7.2 Landing following simulatedengine failure after LDP or DPBL P M

A mandatory minimum of 3 items shall be selected from this section

3.2 Air conditioning(heating, ventilation) P

P3.4 Fuel system P3.5 Electrical system

3.6 Hydraulic system

PP

P3.7 Flight control and trim system

SECTION 1

P* * * M*




Ref

: 11

Form

exa


AIN

ING

, SKI

LL T

EST

AND

PR

OFI

CIE

NC

Y C

HEC

K FO

R A

TPL,

TYP

E R

ATIN

G, S

ING

LE/M

ULT

I-PIL

OTE

HEL

ICO

PTER

ES A

ND

PR

OFI

CIE

NC

Y C

HEC

K FO

R IR

s

PRACTICAL TRAINING

ATPL/TYPE RATING





Checked inFFS/H

FTD

3.8 Anti-icing and de-icing system

3.9 Autopilot/�ight director

3.10 Stability augmentationdevices

3.12 Area navigation system

3.13 Landing gear system

2 attempt

FailPass

1 attempt

FailPassH

4.1 Fire drills (includingevacuation, if applicable)

4.2 Smoke control and removal

4.3 Engine failures, shutdown andrestart at a safe height

Abnormal and emergency procedures

SECTION 4

4.4 Fuel dumping (simulated)

4.5 Tail rotor control (if applicable)

Instrument �ight procedures

SECTION 5

5.1 Instrument take-o�: transitionto instrument �ight is required assoon as possible after becomingairborne

5.2 Adherence to departure andarrival routes and ATC instructions

FFS

4.7 Transmission malfunctions

4.8 Other emergency proceduresas outlined in the appropriateFlight Manual

5.1.1 Simulated engine failureduring departure

5.3 Holding procedures

5.4 3D operations to DH/A of 200feet (60 m) or to higher minima ifrequired by the approach procedure

5.4.1 Manually, without �ight directorNote: According to the AFM, RNP APCH procedures may require the use of autopilot or Flight director. The procedure to be �own manually shall be chosen taken into account such limitations (example choose an ILS for 5.4.1 in case of such AFM limitation).

3.11 Weather radar, radioaltimeter, transponder

3.14 Auxiliary power unit

3.15 Radio, navigation equipment,instruments �ight managementsystem

P

P

P

P

PP

P

P

A mandatory minimum of 3 items shall be selected from this section

4.5.1 Tail control loss (if applicable)

4.6 Incapacitation of crewmember -MPH only

H may not be usedfor this exercise

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

5.4.2 Manually, with Flight Director5.4.3 With coupled autopilot

5.4.4 Manually, with one enginesimulated inoperative; engine failure has to be simulated during�nal approach before passing 1 000 feet above aerodrome level until touchdown or until completion of the missed approach procedure

5.5 2D operations down to theminimum descent altitude MDA/H

(*) actual or simulated IMC

P* * *

P* * *

P* * *

P* * *

P* * *

P* * *P* * *

P* * *

P* * *

For section 5 partial pass = 1 up to 3 failed items

M*

M*

M*

M*

M*




Ref

: 11

Form

exa


AIN

ING

, SKI

LL T

EST

AND

PR

OFI

CIE

NC

Y C

HEC

K FO

R A

TPL,

TYP

E R

ATIN

G, S

ING

LE/M

ULT

I-PIL

OTE

HEL

ICO

PTER

ES A

ND

PR

OFI

CIE

NC

Y C

HEC

K FO

R IR

s

PRACTICAL TRAINING

ATPL/TYPE RATING





Checked inFFS/H

FTD

5.6 Go-around with all enginesoperating on reaching DA/DH orMDA/MDH

5.6.1 Other missed approachprocedures

5.7 IMC autorotation withpower recovery

2 attempt

FailPass

1 attempt

FailPassH

6 Use of optional equipment

Use of optional equipment

SECTION 6

FFS

5.6.2 Go-around with one enginesimulated inoperative on reachingDA/DH or MDA/MDH

5.8 Recovery from unusual attitudes

P

P* * *

P* * *

P* * *

P* * *

P* * *

For sections 1 to 4 and section 6 partial pass = 1 up to 5 failed items

ATPL ONLY

ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE ASSESSED FOR ATPL EXAM

ATPL SKILL TEST ONLY

PASS FAIL

Management of crew cooperation M

Maintaining a general survey of the aircraft by appropriate supervision

M

Setting priorities and making decisions in accordance with safety aspects and relevant rules and regulations appropriate to the operational situation, including emergencies

M

ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE ASSESSED IN CASE OF SPECIAL AGREEMENT FOR ATPL EXAM TO BE CONDUCTED IN BOTH SIMULATOR AND AIRCRAFT

ATPL SKILL TEST ONLY

1ST ATTEMPT 2ND ATTEMPT

Crew coordination and task-sharing must be assessed during each exercise

pass fail pass fail

Standard airport circuit (no engine failure) M

Low high airport circuit (no engine failure) M

Simulated engine failure on take-off M

Standard airport circuit with simulated engine failure M

Go-around with simulated engine failure M

Landing with simulated engine failure M

M*

M*

M*

to be filled by the ato training staff - accueil...direction générale de l’aviation civile...

Documents