tms quality council our mission
DESCRIPTION
TMS Quality Council Our MISSION We are a data-driven decision making team that enhances student learning by providing a channel of communication for stakeholders. Meeting Norms Start on time. Be ready to participate. Stick to the agenda. Keep cell phone usage minimal and discreet. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
TMS Quality CouncilOur MISSION
We are a data-driven decision making team
that enhances student learning by providing a channel
of communication for stakeholders.
Meeting Norms•Start on time.•Be ready to participate.•Stick to the agenda.•Keep cell phone usage minimal and discreet.
The Percentage of TMS Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced on MAPS Reading Assessment is Increasing
Only Current Year Values are Shown.
42%
65%57%
47%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Fall Winter Spring Testing Cycle
Tota
l Per
cent
Current Goal 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
Mean RIT Growth for Current Year is 5.5
2009-2010 gain of 15%
2008-2009 gain of 16%
2007-2008 gain of 17%
2006-2007 loss of 2%
Success
Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced on the MAPS Reading Test
2009 - 2010
17%25%
30%
48%56%
66%61%
67%79%
65%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Fall Winter Spring
Test Cycle
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Sixth Grade Seventh Grade Eighth Grade Current Goal
TMS Spring MAPS Scores by Grade Level - READINGValues shown for most recent data only
2010 TMS EPSS Goal = 65%2011 TMS EPSS Goal for NMSBA and MAPS = 72%
66
79
57
30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Total TMS
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
2011 Goal2010 Scores2010 Goal2009 Scores2009 Goal2008 Scores2008 Goal2007 Scores2007 Goal
The Mean RIT Scores of TMS Students on MAPSGeneral Science AssessmentOnly Current Year Values are Shown.
205
210
207
200
205
210
215
Fall Winter SpringTesting Cycle
RIT
Scor
e
2009 - 2010 2008 - 2009 2007 - 2008 2006 - 2007
Mean RIT Growth for Current Year is 5
2009-2010 gain of 5.
2008-2009 gain of 4.
2007-2008 gain of 1.
2006-2007 gain of 3.
Success
Mean RIT Scores by Grade Level on theMAPS General Science Test
2009 - 2010
200203
205206209 210210 209
214
195
200
205
210
215
220
Fall Winter Spring
Test Cycle
RIT
Sco
res
6th grade 7th grade 8th grade
TMS Spring MAPS Scores by Grade Level - ScienceGeneral Science
Values shown for most recent data only
210
214
210
205
200
204
208
212
216
220
6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Total TMS
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
2010 Scores2009 Scores2008 Scores2007 Scores
The Mean RIT Scores of TMS Students on MAPSScience Concepts and Processes Assessment
Only Current Year Values are Shown.
205
209
207
200
205
210
215
Fall Winter SpringTesting Cycle
RIT
Scor
e
2009 - 2010 2008 - 2009 2007 - 2008 2006 - 2007
Mean RIT Growth for Current Year is 4
2009-2010 gain of 4.
2008-2009 gain of 3.
2007-2008 gain of 1.
2006-2007 gain of 1.
Success
Mean RIT Scores by Grade Level on theMAPS Science Concepts and Processes Test
2009 - 2010
199202
204206
208 209209 210
214
195
200
205
210
215
220
Fall Winter Spring
Test Cycle
RIT
Sco
res
6th grade 7th grade 8th grade
TMS Spring MAPS Scores by Grade Level - ScienceConcepts & Processes
Values shown for most recent data only
204
209
214
209
200
204
208
212
216
220
6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Total TMS
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
2010 Scores2009 Scores2008 Scores2007 Scores
The Percentage of TMS Students Scoring Proficientor Advanced on MAPS Math Assessment is Increasing
OnlyCurrent Year Values are Shown.
52%
35%
44%
21%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Fall Winter SpringTesting Cycle
Tota
l Per
cent
Current Goal #1 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
Mean RIT Growth for Current Year is 6.8
2009-2010 gain of 23%
2008-2009 gain of 24%
2007-2008 gain of 14%
2006-2007 gain of 13%
Success
The Percentage of TMS Students Scoring atBeginning Step on MAPS Math Assessment is Decreasing
Only Current Year Values are Shown.
11% 11%8%
4%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Fall Winter SpringTesting Cycle
Tota
l Per
cent
Current Goal #2 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
2009-2010 decrease of 3%
2008-2009 decrease of 12%
2007-2008 decrease of 16%
2006-2007 decrease of 7%
Success
Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced on the MAPS Math Test
2009 - 2010
5%
18%
30%22%
41%
56%
36%
49% 49%
52%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Fall Winter Spring
Test Cycle
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Sixth Grade Seventh Grade Eighth Grade Current Goal #1
TMS Spring MAPS Scores by Grade Level - MATHValues shown for most recent data only
2010 TMS EPSS Goal = 52%2011 TMS EPSS Goal for NMSBA and MAPS = 63%
56
4944
30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Total TMS
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
2011 Goal2010 Scores2010 Goal2009 Scores2009 Goal2008 Scores2008 Goal2007 Scores2007 Goal
The Percentage of TMS Math Lab Students Scoring Proficient on the Spring MAPS
May 2010
33%
52%
31% 37%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
6th 7th 8th T M S T otalGrade Level and Total TMS
Perc
ent o
f Stu
dent
s
Total number of Proficient Math Lab students:Total number of Math Lab students:
3491
TMS Math Lab Students Have a Greater Mean RIT Growth than Non-Math Lab Students
Fall 2009 to Spring 2010
6.3 6.87.8
8.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
N o L ab 1 L ab 2 L ab 3 L abNumber of Times a Student has Been in a Math Lab
Mea
n R
IT S
core
Gro
wth
Total number of Math Lab students:Total number of Non-Math Lab
91121
TMS Math Lab Students Have a Greater Mean RIT Growth than Non-Math Lab Students
Fall 2009 to Spring 2010
6.37.2 7.8
8.5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
N o L ab N umbers & Operations A lgebra GeometryMean RIT Growth by Math Labs
Mea
n R
IT S
core
Gro
wth
Total number of Math Lab students:Total number of Non-Math Lab
91121
TMS Systems Check III - TeamMean Growth - SPRING
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2
Leadership StrategicPlanning
Student,Stakeholder
Focus
Measurement,Analysis, &
Knowledge Mgt
Human Resource Focus ProcessManagement
PerformanceResults
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
Mea
n Sc
ore
Spring 2008Spring 2009Spring 2010
TMS Systems Check III - ClassroomMean Growth - SPRING
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Leadership ClassroomStrategicPlanning
Student, StakeholderFocus
Measurement, Analysis,& Knowledge Mgt
HumanResource Focus
Process Management PerformanceResults
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
Mea
n Sc
ore
Spring 2010Spring 2009Spring 2008
TMS Attendance Rate 2009 - 2010
TMS Goal
NM Goal
Weekly Total
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
8/17/0
9
8/24/0
9
8/31/0
99/7
/09
9/14/0
9
9/21/0
9
9/28/0
9
10/5/
09
10/12
/09
10/19
/09
10/26
/09
11/2/
09
11/9/
09
11/16
/09
11/23
/09
11/30
/09
12/7/
09
12/14
/091/4
/10
1/11/1
0
1/19/1
0
1/25/1
02/1
/102/8
/10
2/15/1
0
2/22/1
03/1
/103/8
/10
3/15/1
0
3/22/1
04/5
/10
4/12/1
0
4/19/1
0
4/26/1
05/3
/10
5/10/1
0
5/17/1
0
Weekly Total
Year to date rate = Student Population = 220
93.9 Success is staying ABOVE the orange line.
TMS Attendance Rate 2009 - 2010
TMS Goal
NM Goal
3 Year Mean
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
8/17/0
9
8/24/0
9
8/31/0
99/7
/09
9/14/0
9
9/21/0
9
9/28/0
9
10/5/
09
10/12
/09
10/19
/09
10/26
/09
11/2/
09
11/9/
09
11/16
/09
11/23
/09
11/30
/09
12/7/
09
12/14
/091/4
/10
1/11/1
0
1/19/1
0
1/25/1
02/1
/102/8
/10
2/15/1
0
2/22/1
03/1
/103/8
/10
3/15/1
0
3/22/1
04/5
/10
4/12/1
0
4/19/1
0
4/26/1
05/3
/10
5/10/1
0
5/17/1
0
Weekly Total
Year to date rate = Student Population = 220
Success is staying ABOVE the orange line.
93.9
TMS Attendance Rate 2009 - 2010
YTD Mean
TMS Goal
NM Goal
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
8/17/0
9
8/24/0
9
8/31/0
99/7
/09
9/14/0
9
9/21/0
9
9/28/0
9
10/5/
09
10/12
/09
10/19
/09
10/26
/09
11/2/
09
11/9/
09
11/16
/09
11/23
/09
11/30
/09
12/7/
09
12/14
/091/4
/10
1/11/1
0
1/19/1
0
1/25/1
02/1
/102/8
/10
2/15/1
0
2/22/1
03/1
/103/8
/10
3/15/1
0
3/22/1
04/5
/10
4/12/1
0
4/19/1
0
4/26/1
05/3
/10
5/10/1
0
5/17/1
0
YTD Mean Weekly Total
Year to date rate = Student Population = 220
Success is staying ABOVE the orange line.
93.9
TMS Office ReferralsTotal Number (Column) and Per Capita Percentage (Line)
385428
327 303 306 327
152 171
132%
147%
110% 106%
125%
147%
76% 77%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010
291 292 296 287 245 222 200 221School Years and Student Population
Tota
l Num
ber o
f Ref
erra
ls
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
Num
ber o
f Ref
erra
ls p
er S
tude
nt
Success
4/30/2010
TMS Office Referrals - YTD Run Chart2009 - 2010
4
34
43 42
30
50
42
28
46
32
12
29
35
10 12
1923
19
12
00
10
20
30
40
50
60
August September October November December J anuary February March April May
Num
ber o
f Ref
erra
ls
7-year Average 2009-2010
TMS Office Referrals - By grade level and gender
20%9%
32%
4%
6%
29%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Sixth Seventh Eighth
25% 15% 60%Grade Level and Percent of Referrals
Tota
l Per
cent
age
of R
efer
rals
Male Female
4/30/2010
TMS Office Referrals - By grade level and gender - 6 YEAR MEAN2003 through 2009 School Years
17%23%
30%4%
13%11%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Sixth Seventh Eighth
22% 37% 41%Grade Level and Percentage of Referrals
Mea
n Pe
rcen
tage
of R
efer
rals
Male Female
TMS Office Referrals - Top Five Violation Types
37 27 26 26 180
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Refusal to Comply WithSchool Officials
Inappropriate PhysicalContact
Other Fighting Truancy
Num
ber o
f Occ
uren
ces
.
4/30/2010
TMS Office Referrals - Top Five Violation Types - SIX YEAR MEAN2003 through 2009 School Years
19% 10% 9% 9% 8%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Refusal to Comply WithSchool Officials
Fighting Other Insubordination Inappropriate PhysicalContact
Mea
n Pe
rcen
tage
of O
ccur
ence
s
.
TMS Students With Office Referrals(Number of Students, Percentage)
2009 - 2010
26, 12%
16, 7%
6, 3%
6, 3%
10, 5%
157, 71%56% is Six Year
Mean
0 Referrals1 Referral2 Referrals3 Referrals4 Referrals5 or more