tm 5-1 copyright © 1999 addison wesley longman, inc. consumer choice the consideration set ...

20
TM 5- TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice The consideration set Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice Attitude-based versus attribute-based choice Choice Heuristics Determinants of choice strategy

Upload: lydia-beasley

Post on 17-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-11Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Consumer Choice

The consideration set Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice Attitude-based versus attribute-based choice Choice Heuristics Determinants of choice strategy

Page 2: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-22Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

The Consideration Set...Consumers rarely consider more than nine brands before choosing!

Brands available in the marketplace Consideration Set Choice (>20 brands) (7 + 2 brands) (1 brand)

Page 3: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-33Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Page 4: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-44Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

The Consideration Set

Part-List Cuing Attraction Effect

–Williams-Sonoma Home Bread Bakery $275Later offered a more expensive model and sales of the original model almost doubled–Cross Pen or $6 - 36% chose the Cross PenCross Pen or decoy pen or $6 - 46 % chose the Cross Pen

Tradeoff Contrast Effect–$1,000 PC with 640K or $1,200 PC with 960K(Tradeoff of $200 for an additional 320K)

Compromise Effect

Page 5: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-55Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Part-List Cuing

.64 .59 .60 .47 .56 .43

Proportion of Brands Recalled

0 5 15

Females

Males

1

0

Page 6: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-66Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Exp. 1 Homogeneous Brands

0 5 15M .59 .47 .43F .64 .60 .56

Exp. 2 Heterogeneous Brands

0 5 15M .59 .47 .43F .64 .60 .56

Exp. 3 Prop. of subjects Prop. of subjectsrecalling at least 1 recalling at least 1item from nasal item from multisymptomspray category formula category

no cue mutisymp. cue no cue spray cue 1.00 .78 .78 .33

Page 7: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-77Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Part-List Cuing Effect - Why?

1. P(retrieving itemi) = Strength of Assoc. Between i and Category Strength of Assoc. Between Each Item

& Category

2. Sampling with Replacement

Sampling an item increases strength of association between that item and the category

Page 8: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-88Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

How Choices and Comparisons Are Made

Stimulus-Based Choice Memory-Based Choice Mixed Choice

(Alba et. al. (1993) - Consumers prefer the stimulus brand overa memory brand, even when the memory brand is better. However, memory brand is preferred more over time when positive features are made more memorable by frequency (many positives) or by puffery .)

Attitude-Based vs. Attribute-Based Choice - Accessibility-Diagnosticity Model

Page 9: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-99Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Page 10: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-1010Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Sanyo attribute recall4.73 2.08 3.92 4.97 3.57

Gro

up

1:

Lo

wIn

terf

ere

nc

e p

lus

ch

oic

e t

as

k

Gro

up

2:

Hig

hIn

terf

ere

nc

e p

lus

c

ho

ice

ta

sk

Gro

up

3:

Lo

wIn

terf

ere

nc

e p

lus

re

ca

ll a

ttri

bu

tes

Gro

up

4:

Lo

wIn

terf

ere

nc

e p

lus

re

ca

ll e

va

lua

tio

n

Gro

up

5:

Lo

wC

on

tro

l G

rou

p

Page 11: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-1111Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Sanyo evaluation recall1.58 1.19 1.81 1.25 1.11

Gro

up

1:

Lo

wIn

terf

ere

nc

e p

lus

ch

oic

e t

as

k

Gro

up

2:

Hig

hIn

terf

ere

nc

e p

lus

c

ho

ice

ta

sk

Gro

up

3:

Lo

wIn

terf

ere

nc

e p

lus

re

ca

ll a

ttri

bu

tes

Gro

up

4:

Lo

wIn

terf

ere

nc

e p

lus

re

ca

ll e

va

lua

tio

n

Gro

up

5:

Lo

wC

on

tro

l G

rou

p

Page 12: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-1212Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Page 13: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-1313Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Page 14: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-1414Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Evaluation recall4.03 3.28 4.12 4.12 3.48 3.40

Choice Recall Control

Consistent Inconsistent

Page 15: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-1515Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Choice Heuristics

Attitude-Based Strategies–The Theory of Reasoned Action–Information Integration Theory–Attitude Heuristic–Frequency of Good and Bad Features Heuristic

Page 16: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-1616Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Frequency of good/bad features is one way to choose...

Page 17: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-1717Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Choice Heuristics

Attribute-Based Strategies–Between Alternative Processing

Lexicographic HeuristicLexicographic Semiorder Heuristic Mr. Coffee Accel PR12A $27 90 Mr. Coffee Accel PR16 $25 85 Mr Coffee BL110 $22 80Elimination-By-Aspects HeuristicAdditive-Difference HeuristicMajority of Confirming Dimensions Heuristic

–Within Alternative ProcessingConjunctive HeuristicDisjunctive Heuristic

–Phased Strategies

Page 18: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-1818Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

The lexiographic heuristic involves choosing the best brand on the basis of its most important attribute.

Page 19: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-1919Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Determinants of Choice Strategy

Processing Goals (Involvement, Accountability, Perceived Risk)

Processing Load- Decision Difficulty (# of brands, # of attributes, time pressure)

Context- Brand-based vs. Attribute-based format- Framing Effect (75% lean/ 25% fat ground beef)

- Unwanted Premium Effect (Pillsbury Brownie Cake Mix or Pillsbury Brownie Cake Mix Plus)(Collector’s Plate Offer - reduced price with POF)

Page 20: TM 5-1 Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Consumer Choice  The consideration set  Stimulus-based versus memory-based choice  Attitude-based

TM 5-TM 5-2020Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Copyright © 1999 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Processing goals are influenced by importance of a decision, accountability, and perceived risk...