tierney communication 2011

28
Examiners Training Course Communications Sean Tierney Lusaka December 2011

Upload: amnch-vascular-surgery

Post on 21-Nov-2014

683 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


5 download

DESCRIPTION

for COSECSA exam course, Lusaka, Zambia, 2011

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tierney communication 2011

Examiners Training CourseCommunications

Sean Tierney

Lusaka December 2011

Page 2: Tierney communication 2011

MSC format (2010)

• Clinical Bays (*5 in duplicate)– Thyroglossal cyst– Abdominal mass– Jaundice– Penile carcinoma– Soft tissue sarcoma– Paget’s disease of nipple

• Operative skills (*1)– Bowel anastomosis

• Communications skills (*2)– Giving (consent)– Getting (history taking)

8 bays in total

Page 3: Tierney communication 2011

Communication skills

Page 4: Tierney communication 2011

Communication skills

• Do we need to assess communication skills separately – why bother?

• What is to be assessed and How

• Can communication skills be taught and/or learned?

Credit: Richard Young, Consultation Skills and Curriculum Development Tutor, UEA

Page 5: Tierney communication 2011

Why bother with communication skills?

• Effective communication is essential to the practice of high quality medicine

Page 6: Tierney communication 2011

Why bother …

• Ensuring more effective interviews accuracy efficiency supportiveness

• Enhancing patient and doctor satisfaction

• Improving health outcomes for patients

The average doctor undertakes 200,000 consultations in a professional lifetime!

• Promoting collaboration and partnership

• Managing expectations

Page 7: Tierney communication 2011

Assessment of communication skills

• Should be included at MCS level

• Separate & distinct– Busy clinical agenda– Language issues

• Structured– ?OSCE– global rating

• Information giving & gathering

Page 8: Tierney communication 2011

A model of assessment

Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic Medicine (Supplement) 1990; 65: S63-S7.

Knows

Shows how

Knows how

Does

Pro

fess

ion

al au

then

tici

ty

Cognition

Behaviour

Page 9: Tierney communication 2011

How can we assess ?

Knows

Shows how

Knows how

Does

Knows Factual tests: MCQ, essay type, oral…..

Knows how(Clinical) Context based tests:EMQ, essay type, oral…..

Shows howPerformance assessment in vitro:OSCE, SP-based test, long/short cases…..

DoesPerformance assessment in vivo: Masked simulated patients, Video

Page 10: Tierney communication 2011

Providing structure

Building the relationship

Initiating the session

Gathering information

Physical examination

Explanation & Planning

Closing the session

Model of the consultation

Calgary Cambridge model

Page 11: Tierney communication 2011

Providing structure

Building the relationship

Initiating the session

Gathering information

Physical examination

Explanation & Planning

Closing the session

Calgary Cambridge model

Information gathering

Page 12: Tierney communication 2011

Providing structure

Building the relationship

Initiating the session

Gathering information

Physical examination

Explanation & Planning

Closing the session

Calgary Cambridge model

Information giving

Page 13: Tierney communication 2011

Providing structure

Building the relationship

Initiating the session

Gathering information

Physical examination

Explanation & Planning

Closing the session

Initiation

Calgary Cambridge model

• Preparation

• reading of the brief

• establishing initial rapport

• Introductions

• identifying the reasons for the consultation

Page 14: Tierney communication 2011

Providing structure

Building the relationship

Initiating the session

Gathering information

Physical examination

Explanation & Planning

Closing the session

Gathering Information

Calgary Cambridge model

• exploration of the patient’s problems to discover the:

• biomedical perspective

• the patient’s perspective

• background information - context

Page 15: Tierney communication 2011

Providing structure

Building the relationship

Initiating the session

Gathering information

Physical examination

Explanation & Planning

Closing the session

Explanation & Planning

Calgary Cambridge model

• providing the correct type and amount of information

• aiding accurate recall and understanding

• achieving a shared understanding: incorporating the patient’s illness framework

• planning: shared decision making

Page 16: Tierney communication 2011

Providing structure

Building the relationship

Initiating the session

Gathering information

Physical examination

Explanation & Planning

Closing the session

Providing structure

Calgary Cambridge model

Making organisation overt

Attending to flow

Time keeping

Page 17: Tierney communication 2011

Providing structure

Building the relationship

Initiating the session

Gathering information

Physical examination

Explanation & Planning

Closing the session

Building the relationship

Calgary Cambridge model

using appropriate non-verbal behaviour

developing rapport

involving the patient

Page 18: Tierney communication 2011

Providing structure

Building the relationship

Initiating the session

Gathering information

Physical examination

Explanation & Planning

Closing the session

Model of the consultation

Calgary Cambridge model

Page 19: Tierney communication 2011

Gathering information

Information gathering

• patient’s narrative• question style

– open vs closed

• attentive listening• establish baseline• picking up cues• clarification

– check back

• Chunks & checks• internal summary• appropriate use of language

Process

Page 20: Tierney communication 2011

Gathering information

Information gathering

• patient’s narrative• question style

– open vs closed

• attentive listening• establish baseline• picking up cues• clarification

– check back

• Chunks & checks• internal summary• appropriate use of language

• History– Sequence of events– Symptom analysis– Systems review

• Patients perspective– ideas & beliefs– concerns– Expectations

• Background & context– medical/surgical history– social history (occupation)

Process Content

Page 21: Tierney communication 2011

Human Factors

Page 22: Tierney communication 2011

Human Factors

Page 23: Tierney communication 2011

Human Factors

Page 24: Tierney communication 2011

Teaching communications skills

Page 25: Tierney communication 2011

Human Factors training RCSI

Page 26: Tierney communication 2011

Review

• communication skills can be taught• best model is experiential• all levels (up to senior clinicians) benefit

Page 27: Tierney communication 2011

School for Surgeons

UK Council of Clinical Communication in Undergraduate Medical Education

Page 28: Tierney communication 2011

Communications skills for surgeons