theme 3 session 14 corporate level strategy
DESCRIPTION
Yes or NoTRANSCRIPT
Strategy: Choices and Impact MN6005
Session 14 (w/c 14/01/13 -3b) Corporate Level Strategic
Choices
Lecturer: xxxxxxxxStrategy Theme 3: Strategy Directions and
Choices
What did we talk about last week?
Re-cap of session 13 : Business Unit Level Strategic Choice
Image source: http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/anyanswers/question/i-think-client-has-sacked-me
Objectives • Understand the difference between business
unit and corporate level strategies• Identify alternative corporate strategy options
and choices (Portfolio Analysis)• Consider the different roles of the corporate
parent
Today
Levels of strategy
• Corporate-Level Strategy is concerned with the overall purpose and scope of an organisation and how to add value to business units
• Business-Level Strategy is concerned with the way a business seeks to compete successfully in its particular market
• Operational Level Strategy is concerned with how different parts of the organisation deliver the strategy in terms of managing resources, processes and people
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 1
The Corporate Parent manages the portfolio of business unitsExample Virgin – highly diversified
source: http://www.virgin.com/ accessed 1/1/13
Strategic directions andcorporate-level strategy
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
Logic of the Portfolio
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
Portfolio matrices
Growth/Share (BCG) Matrix
Directional Policy (GE-McKinsey) Matrix
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
The growth share (or BCG) matrix
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
The growth share (or BCG)
• A star is a business unit which has a high market share in a growing market.
• A question mark (or problem child) is a business unit in a growing market, but it does not have a high market share.
• A cash cow is a business unit that has a high market share in a mature market.
• A dog is a business unit that has a low market share in a static or declining market.
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
The growth share (or BCG)
• A star is a business unit which has a high market share in a growing market.
• A question mark (or problem child) is a business unit in a growing market, but it does not have a high market share.
• A cash cow is a business unit that has a high market share in a mature market.
• A dog is a business unit that has a low market share in a static or declining market.
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
BCG matrix/Boston box: the pros
• Simplicity • PIMS (profit impact of market share) research
provides some evidence to support BCG matrix
• Part of common business vocabulary• Allows for purposive approach rather than
following the vagaries of the market-place
BCG matrix/Boston box: limitations
• Limited two-dimensional (2 factors)• Its simplicity makes it prone to overuse• Arguably, a ‘self fulfilling’ strategy tool• May be reasons for keeping a ‘dog’ e.g.
complementary product
The directional policy(GE–McKinsey) matrix
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
Strategy guidelines based on the (GE–McKinsey) directional policy matrix
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
Indicators of Strategic Business Unit Strength and Market Attractiveness
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
Role of the Corporate Parent
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
Balancing Synergy and Responsiveness
Low parental control• Collection of businesses• Potentially unrelated
businesses• Focus on business unit
responsiveness• Centre allocates capital and
monitors performance• Low co-ordination between
business units• Simple to add new
businesses
High parental control• Common core business• Tightly related (focussed)
businesses• Focus on multi-business
synergy• Centre sets direction and
manages synergies• Highly integrated and inter-
dependent business units• New businesses require
integration
De Wit, B and Meyer, R (editors) (2010). 4th Edition Strategy: Process, Content, Context, Thomson International Business Press: London. chapter 6
Corporate rationales – role of ‘Head Office’
Original Source: Adapted from M. Goold, A. Campbell and M. Alexander, Corporate Level Strategy, Wiley, 1994
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
Corporate rationales
• The portfolio manager operates as an active investor in a way that shareholders in the stock market are either too dispersed or too inexpert to be able to do.
• The synergy manager is a corporate parent seeking to enhance value for business units by managing synergies across business units.
• The parental developer seeks to employ its own central capabilities to add value to its businesses.
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
Value-Adding Corporate Parents
Envisioning Strategic Intent Central Services and Resources
Focus
Clarity to external stakeholders
Clarity to business units
Investment
Scale advantages
Pool of management capabilities
Intervention at Business Level Expertise
Monitor performance
Action to improve performance
Challenge/develop strategic ambitions
Coaching/training
Achieve synergies
Provide expertise/services
Knowledge creation/sharing
Brokering linkages/accessing external networks
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
Value-Destroying Corporate Parents
• Bureaucracy– Adds cost– Hinders responsiveness
• Buffer from reality– Financial safety net
• Diversity and size– Lack of clarity on overall vision
• Managerial ambition– Empire building
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
Read the Case Study: Virgin Group
• What type of corporate parent is Virgin (portfolio manager, synergy manager or parental developer)?
• How does the Virgin Group, as a corporate parent, add value to its businesses?
• What’s the logic of the portfolio? Why do you think they are in mobile telephony, travel, financial services, leisure, music, holidays and health & wellness?
• What are the main risks facing the Virgin Group as a result of their strategy? How might they be reduced?
Summary
• Many corporations comprise several, sometimes many business units. Decisions and activities above the level of business units are the concern of the corporate parent.
• There are several portfolio models to help corporate parents manage their businesses, of which the most common are: the BCG matrix and the directional policy matrix
• Corporate parents may seek to add value by adopting different parenting roles: the portfolio manager, the synergy manager or the parental developer.
source: Johnson, Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9 th Edition, Pearson Education, Chapter 7
Task for your Learning Journal
1. In your own words and using referenced quotes describe the difference between ‘business unit level’ strategy and ‘corporate level’ strategy
2. Discuss the corporate parenting style of Virgin group.
Note: this should take you about an hour. As an indicative guide, based on student submissions from semester 1, this can be completed to a high standard in 300 to 500 words but of course the quality of what is written matters greatly. Use referenced quotes to demonstrate academic reading. Demonstrate that you have a good understanding of the content of the module, the models and theories in particular, and can apply this to a real-world organisation like Virgin. This should be completed within 7 days i.e. before your next class.