the virtual museum
TRANSCRIPT
Jonathan Bowen is considered by many
as the `founding father' of the Virtual
Library museums pages (www.icom.org/
vlmp), one of the premier Internet sites in
the museum field. He is a lecturer at the
Department of Computer Science,
University of Reading (United Kingdom),
where he leads the Formal Methods and
Software Engineering Group and was
previously a senior researcher at the
Oxford University Computing Laboratory.
He has worked in the field of computing
in both industry and academia since
1977 and has served on more than
fifteen programme committees including
a major working group within the
European Union information
technologies programme, ESPRIT. The
author of 140 publications including
nine books, Jonathan Bowen won the
1994 IEE (Institution of Electrical
Engineers) Charles Babbage Premium
award. In 1997 he was honorary chair,
workshop presenter and an invited
speaker at the first `Museums and the
Web' conference and has been an active
participant in subsequent conferences.
This issue of Museum International, to-
gether with the previous issue, is dedi-
cated to online museums. In the first issue
we explored how online museum `com-
munities' are being formed and organized;
here we consider some experiences of
individual museums in using the Internet
and the Web in presenting themselves
online.
Museums are traditionally information
providers, drawing on and interpreting
their collections for their visitors. Schools,
the general public, tourists, scholars, etc.,
all potential museum visitors, are informa-
tion gatherers. Previously these gatherers
have had to physically visit the informa-
tion providers; however, with the advent
of the Internet, it is increasingly possible
for the providers to reach out to the
gatherers who may be located in their
homes, workplaces, schools, libraries, etc.
Museums are well placed to provide real
content that is appealing to network users.
Producing a Web site can be difficult for
museums. The first question should be,
`Why do we want or need a Web site?'
Answers will vary for different museums,
but it is very important to consider the
experience from the point of view of
virtual visitors and what they might wish
to gain from using the museum Web site,
rather than just considering what the
museum has to offer. A museum with an
online presence needs to build up its vir-
tual visitor community just as it is desirable
to encourage return visits by real visitors.
Here are some particular points to con-
sider when creating a museum Web site:
• Do not try to re-create the `traditional'
museum experience. The Web is a
different medium with its own strengths
and weaknesses, which should be
exploited to enhance the virtual visitor
experience. Vast amounts of informa-
tion such as museum catalogue data-
bases can be made available online at
relatively little cost since computer disk
storage is cheap.
• Obvious and consistent navigation aids
should be included on all pages within a
Web site to allow a visitor to move easily
within the site. For example, in a
physical museum it may be difficult to
find the entrance hall from some gal-
leries, but in a virtual museum all loca-
tions should include a hyperlink directly
back to the home page for the museum.
• Avoid making high-quality graphical
images available unless you are happy
for them to be reused by others. Such
images are slow-loading and should
never be included in navigation pages
within a Web site. In addition, copyright
issues may need to be addressed. It is
worthwhile including a copyright notice
where appropriate, but online copyright
is an evolving area. Virtual visitors
expect images, so low- and medium-
resolution images (which do not print
very well, but are adequate for screen
viewing) should certainly be included.
• A popular reason for searching a mu-
seum Web site is to learn about a
museum that may be located far from
where the virtual visitor lives. This
certainly raises awareness of the mu-
seum and could well influence a visit if
the person is ever in the same vicinity as
the museum. This would bear further
investigation to see exactly how large
the effects are in practice. Whatever the
influence exerted, it is likely to increase
exponentially because of the expansion
in use of the Internet itself.
Perhaps the most important feature in the
design of a Web site for a museum is the
home page or location at which most
4 ISSN 1350-0775, Museum International (UNESCO, Paris), No. 205 (Vol. 52, No. 1, 2000)ß UNESCO 2000
Published by Blackwell Publishers, 108 Cowley Road, Oxford, OX4 1JF (UK) and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148 (USA)
The virtual museumJonathan Bowen
virtual visitors first arrive. The home page
and other important, frequently used
navigation pages should load quickly.
Large, slow-loading multimedia resources
(high-quality images, interactive media,
video, audio, etc.) should be downloaded
to the virtual visitor once an item of
particular interest (e.g. associated with a
specific museum object or gallery) has
been reached.
An important facility that museums can
provide is the presentation of online
virtual exhibitions, perhaps mirroring
actual exhibitions in the galleries, both
temporary and permanent. This also
allows access to material not otherwise
generally available, such as objects in
store (normally the vast majority of a
serious museum's collection), or those too
fragile or sensitive for display. A recent
survey has discovered that around three-
quarters of virtual visitors expect to find
virtual exhibitions at museum Web sites.1
Increasingly, multimedia using graphics,
sound, video, as well as text, is possible.
The same survey indicates that 87 per cent
of people visiting museum Web sites
expect to find images. A major limiting
factor at the moment is the speed of
access, but this is likely to increase in the
future (although not as fast as many
would like).
Newsgroups and mailing lists allow dis-
cussion between a group of people,
potentially geographically distributed
throughout the world. Although museums
could use suitable newsgroups to pub-
licize their activities, so far few have taken
advantage of this very cheap avenue of
information dissemination to any great
extent, perhaps due to lack of appreciation
of the possibilities offered to interact with
potential visitors. The Deja Web site
(www.deja.com/) provides a convenient
interface to many newsgroups.
Probably the most common reason for
visiting a museum Web site is to explore a
personal interest. A survey could well
help with ascertaining the most useful
types of information presentation and
museums could put greater effort into
more popular parts of their virtual sites.
Most Web servers can record the number
of `hits' per page automatically, and this
information could be very helpful in
determining how the Web site is being
used. Online forms for feedback (similar
to the more traditional visitor books) are
also worth while. In any case, it is very
important for a museum to think carefully
about why it wants or needs a virtual Web
site, and what potential benefits this could
bring.
This issue of Museum International pre-
sents the experiences of a number of
diverse museums in creating, and even
more importantly maintaining, an online
presence. Jim Angus of the Natural History
Museum of Los Angeles County in
California has much practical experience
of these issues, having almost single-
handedly set up the Web site for his
museum. His article distils some of this
knowledge.
While the United States certainly main-
tains a lead in the percentage of museums
with their own Web presence, museums
from all over the world are starting to
create Web sites. A. Enis Cetin, Omer N.
Gerek and Ahmed H. Tewfik present the
experience of creating a Web site for the
Topkapi Palace Museum in Istanbul,
Turkey, a museum with rich and diverse
offerings.
Jim Devine has been very active in
creating an interesting Web site for the
Hunterian Museum in Glasgow, Scotland.
He has used advanced technology such as
QuickTime Virtual Reality to create online
ß UNESCO 2000 5
virtual reality access to galleries. In his
article with Ray Welland he covers some
of the multimedia projects involving his
museum. With the Hunterian Museum's
location within the University of Glasgow,
Jim Devine has made full use of access to
computer science students who are nor-
mally very keen to collaborate in the pro-
duction of Web-based resources for projects
as part of their courses. This is something
that other museums would be well advised
to foster with their local university since it
can result in excellent online resources at
very low cost to the museum.
MUVA, the Virtual Museum of Arts El Pais,
is unusual in that it is solely a virtual
museum with no corresponding actual
museum associated with it. Created in
Uruguay to showcase art that could not be
seen elsewhere, it is the country's first
virtual museum. It is very graphical in its
presentation and has won a `Museums
and the Web' conference Best of the Web
Award. Alicia Haber presents the experi-
ence of setting up a virtual museum,
including the thorny question of how to
budget for such a project.
Lin Hsin Hsin is an artist and poet from
Singapore who has created her own online
Art Museum that, like MUVA, has no
corresponding museum in reality. This
virtual museum is a very personal project,
reflecting the vision of a single artist. It
clearly demonstrates that one of the great
benefits of the Web is that it empowers
individuals to act creatively, often to greater
effect than much larger organizations.
Bogota 's Museum of Gold is one of the
rare Colombian institutions to have
established a presence on the Internet.
Eduardo Londono describes the experi-
ence of setting up the Web site and how it
was revamped as users' expectations
become increasingly demanding.
Finally, Greg Van Alstyne is in charge of
the Web site for the Museum of Modern
Art (MoMA) in New York, an extremely
stylish site which won the top Best of the
Web Award at the 1998 `Museums and the
Web' conference. The site takes a mini-
malist approach, very much in keeping
with the style of the museum itself, and
the article presents some of the design
philosophy behind it. Other museums
would do well to visit MoMA online to
attempt to emulate and learn from the
structure and graphical presentation of
this site.
While it is very important for individual
museums to have their own online
presence in the form of a Web site, e-mail
communication and so on, as emphasized
in the previous issue, it will be increas-
ingly necessary for museums to organize
themselves in a collective manner online.
A recent example of such an initiative in
the United Kingdom is the 24 Hour
Museum (www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/).
This includes information on some 2,000
museums around the United Kingdom,
whether or not they provide their own
online information, accessible as a search-
able database.
A number of museums that do have their
own Web sites are participating more
actively as pilot sites. Each of these mu-
seums provides special hidden informa-
tion as part of their Web site that indicates
the location of important standard data
such as museum location, opening times,
facilities for the disabled, etc. (Around
thirty such categories have been desig-
nated.) These pilot museums have ex-
panded entries in the 24 Hour Museum
database allowing virtual visitors access
directly to the information they require
about a particular museum without having
to enter the museum's home page and
then search for the data in a more
6 ß UNESCO 2000
haphazard manner. The 24 Hour Museum
Web site also includes museum news,
resources especially for children and a
featured museum `Web site of the Week',
making it a dynamic site which visitors
may wish to revisit. The 24 Hour Museum
was recently designated a national mu-
seum by Chris Smith, the UK government
minister in charge of the Department of
Culture, Media and Sport, and the site may
well become the main online portal for
UK museums.
The English novelist Penelope Lively
(born 1933) wrote in her book Moon
Tiger (1987) that `we carry a museum
inside our heads'. Perhaps the Web is a
way for museums to make some of their
more ethereal information available to all.
But it should be recalled that online
facilities are complementary to traditional
museum services; `virtual museums' will
not replace real museums, but instead
should be used as a tool which en-
courages actual visits to actual museums.
■
Note
1. J. P. Bowen, `Time for Renovations: A
Survey of Museum Web Sites', in D. Bearman
and J. Trant (eds.), Museums and the Web
1999: Selected Papers from an International
Conference, New Orleans, 11±14 March 1999,
pp. 163±72, Pittsburgh, Pa., Archives &
Museum Informatics, 1999.
ß UNESCO 2000 7