the utility of enterprise architecture to records and

20
The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and Archives Specialists Dr. Shadrack Katuu Research Fellow, Department of Information Science University of South Africa

Upload: others

Post on 22-May-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

Archives Specialists Dr.ShadrackKatuu

ResearchFellow,DepartmentofInformationScience

UniversityofSouthAfrica

Page 2: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

Outline

1.0 Introduction2.0 LiteratureReview3.0 EAFrameworks–primeronTOGAF4.0 DesignofanintegratedTOGAFFramework5.0 Concludingremarks

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 2

Page 3: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

1.0 Introduction

•  Thetransdisciplinaryfieldofcomputationalarchivalscienceprovides,amongotherthings,aplatformthatfacilitatestheexplorationofemergingmethodsandtechnologiesaswellasnewformsofanalysisthatsupporthistorical,social,scientific,andculturalresearchengagementwithrecords/archives(Marcianoetal.2018).•  Inthelastfewyearsexpertsincomputationalaswellasarchivalscienceshaveexploredandmappedseveralconceptsandmethodsinbothfieldsresultinginenrichingtransdisciplinaryefforts.

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 3

Page 4: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

1.0 Introduction

•  Therearefourmajorcategoriesofcomputationalthinking:•  datapractices,•  modelingandsimulationpractices,

•  computationalproblem-solvingpractices,and

•  systemsthinkingpractices(Weintropetal.2016,p.127-147)

•  Thispresentationfallsundersystemsthinkingpracticeswithitsfocusonunderstandingthedynamicswithinsystemsandhowthosesystemschangeovertime.

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 4

Page 5: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

1.0 Introduction

•  Thispresentationdiscussesenterprisearchitecture(EA),thatemergedinthe1980stoaddressinstitutionalcomplexityinanincreasinglysophisticatedorganizationalenvironment(Ahlemann,F.,et.al2012)•  EAemergedasanapproachtoimprovethealignmentbetweentheorganization’sbusinessandtheirinformationsystems(Ahlemann,F.,et.al2012)

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 5

IncreasinglywemayfeellikeAliceinWonderland,havingfallenintoarabbithole…intoafantasyworldpopulatedbypeculiar“anthropomorphicsystems”(e.g.ArtificialIntelligencesystems).

Page 6: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

1.0 Introduction

•  AtthepointofEA’semergence,computersoftwaredevelopersandinformationsystemengineersrealizedthattheycouldonlydesignsuitableITcomponentsifthey“understoodhowtheorganisationworksasdefinedbyitsprocesses,organisationalstructureandgoals”(Ahlemann,F.,et.al2012)

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 6

Source:IASASpain,2014

Page 7: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

1.0 Introduction •  Fordecades,recordsandarchivesspecialistshavetriedtofulfiltheirprofessionalmandateusingtheoriesandmethodsdevelopedforapaperratherthandigitalenvironment.

•  Thedigitalenvironmentconstitutesavastarrayofsoftwareapplicationsandtechnologicalinfrastructure.Recordsandarchivesspecialistsneedtomakesenseofthisdigitalecososystemintheirquesttosupportinginstitutionalfunctionsandactivities.Thisisnecessarytoinstitutesystematicmanagementofrecords/archivesorpotentialrecords/archivesgeneratedbythesoftwareapplications.

•  ThispresentationisdrawnfromaresearchprojectinvestigatingtheutilityofEAtorecordsandarchivesspecialists

•  Theoverallstudyconstitutesfourcomponents:•  (1)areviewofliteratureonEA;•  (2)anassessmentofEAframeworkswiththechosenframeworkforthisstudybeingTOGAF(TheOpenGroupArchitectureFramework);

•  (3)thedesignofanintegratedTOGAFmodelincorporatingrecordkeepingrequirements;and•  (4)thevalidationoftheintegratedmodel

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 7

Page 8: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

2.0 Literature Review •  Moderninstitutionsinvestlargeamountsofresourcestobuildtechnologyplatformsandbusinessapplicationstosupportorganizationalactivitieswhichwillfulfiltheirinstitutionalmandate.

•  AsITdepartmentsbuildsystems,theycreatelegaciesbasedonbusinessassumptionsthatmightnolongerholdtrue.

•  EffectivemanagementoftechnologyassetshasnecessitatedthedevelopmentofportfoliomanagementtechniquesandmodelstomapoutthecompleteITecosystemintheirinstitutions.

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 8

Page 9: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

2.0 Literature Review

•  Formanysuchinstitutions,creatinganinventoryofsystemsorapplicationsisjustthebeginningofthemanagementprocess.

•  Therestofthemanagementprocessentailsmodelingtheorganizationalstructure,businessprocesses,informationflow,informationsystems,andinfrastructure

•  EAmodelsdifferfrompurebusinessprocessmodelsastheyholisticallydescriberelatedenterprisecapabilitiesanddifferentlayers’assets

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 9

Source:Basten&Brons,2012,pp.215-216

Page 10: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

2.0 Literature Review •  IndividualcountrieshavebeenadoptingEAatdifferentpacesandlevelsofsophistication.•  Forinstance,inthelate1990sandearly2000s,severalpublicsectorexpertsinAustraliarecognisedthepotentialforEA’sutilitytoassessthemanagementofdataandinformationinlocalcouncils(LocalGovernmentAssociationofTasmania,&SchoolofInformationSystems[UniversityofTasmania]2003).

•  Inthecourseofthe2000s,CanadaembeddedEAprincipleswithinthefederalgovernmentwiththechiefarchitect’sofficelocatedwithintheTreasuryBoardSecretariat(Doucet2008).

•  SimilartrendsareseenincountriesintheglobalperipherysuchasSouthAfricaandKenya.

•  Whiledifferentcountriesareatvariedlevelsofsophistication,thesituationamongstrecordsandarchivesspecialistsremains(mostly)vague.

•  Themostvisibleeffortshavebeenthroughthestandardizationprocess.Around2016,recordsprofessionalsinISO’sTechnicalCommitteeSub-Committee11embarkedoncreatingacommonreferenceforrecordsprofessionalsandenterprisearchitectstitled“RecordsRequirementsinEnterpriseArchitecture”coveringrequirementsforrecordsprocessesandsystems(InternationalStandardsOrganization2018)

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 10

Page 11: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

3.0 EA Frameworks – a primer on TOGAF

•  Sincethemid-1980s,EApractitionersdevelopedmorethantwodozenframeworks,includingtheZachmanFramework,TOGAF,andtheFederalEnterpriseArchitecture(FEA)framework.•  Theseframeworksarepopularbecauseoftheirmaturity.Zachmanistheoldest;TOGAFandFEAallowfreeaccesstoresourcesandinformation.

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 11

Enterprise-developedFrameworks

• TheOpenGroupArchitectureFramework(TOGAF)• GeneralisedEnterpriseReferenceArchitectureandMethodology(GERAM)

• ReferenceModelofOpenDistributedProcessing(RM-ODP)• GuidetotheEnterpriseArchitectureBodyofKnowledge(EABOK)

CommercialFrameworks

• IntegratedArchitectureFramework(IAF)• ZachmanFramework• ArchitectureofIntegratedInformationSystems(ARIS)• OBASHIBusinessandITmethodologyandframework

DefenceIndustryFrameworks

• DepartmentofDefenceArchitectureFramework(DoDAF)andTechnicalReferenceModel(TRM)

• NATOArchitectureFramework(NATO)• TechnicalArchitectureFrameworkforInformationManagement(TAFIM)

• UKMinistryofDefenceArchitectureFramework(MODAF)• DepartmentofNationalDefenceandtheCanadianForcesArchitectureFramework(DNDAF)

• FranceDGAArchitectureFramework(AGATE)

GovernmentFrameworks

• FederalEnterpriseArchitectureFramework(FEAF)• GovernmentEnterpriseArchitecture(GEA)• TreasuryEnterpriseArchitectureFramework(TEAF)• EuropeanInteroperabilityFramework(EIF)• NISTEnterpriseArchitecture(NIST)• TreasuryInformationSystemArchitectureFramework(TISAF)

Source:BastenandBrons2012,p.208

Page 12: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

3.0 EA Frameworks – a primer on TOGAF

•  TOGAFwascreatedbyTheOpenGroupasatechnologyarchitecturemethodologybasedonthetechnicalarchitectureframeworkforinformationmanagement(TAFIM),aframeworkdevelopedbytheUnitedStatesDepartmentofDefense(Armour,F.J.et.al1999)•  TOGAFhasthreemainpillars:

•  ArchitectureDevelopmentMethod(ADM):ThisdescribesamethodfordevelopingandmanagingthelifecycleofanEAandformsthecoreofTOGAF.

•  EnterpriseContinuum(EC):Thisprovidesmethodsforclassifyingarchitectureandsolutionartifacts,bothinternalandexternaltothearchitecturerepository,astheyevolvefromgenericfoundationarchitecturestoorganization-specificarchitectures.

•  EnterpriseArchitectureDomains(EAD):TheseareareasofspecialisationthatarecommonlyacceptedassubsetsofanoverallEA.Thesedomainsare•  businessarchitecture,•  applicationsarchitecture,•  technologyarchitecture,and•  dataarchitecture.

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 12

Page 13: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

3.0 EA Frameworks – a primer on TOGAF

WithinTOGAF’senterprisearchitecturedomainsarefourinterrelatedareasofspecialization:•  Businessarchitecturewhichdefinesthebusinessstrategy,governance,organization,andkeybusinessprocessesoftheorganization•  Applicationsarchitecturewhichprovidesablueprintfortheindividualsystemstobedeployed,theinteractionsbetweentheapplicationsystems,andtheirrelationshipstothecorebusinessprocessesoftheorganizationwiththeframeworksforservicestobeexposedasbusinessfunctionsforintegration•  Dataarchitecturewhichdescribesthestructureofanorganization'slogicalandphysicaldataassetsandtheassociateddatamanagementresources•  Technicalarchitecture,ortechnologyarchitecture,whichdescribesthehardware,software,andnetworkinfrastructureneededtosupportthedeploymentofcore,mission-criticalapplications.

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 13

Page 14: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

4.0 Design of an integrated TOGAF Framework

•  AspartofaresearchstudyconductedundertheauspicesoftheInterPARESTrustproject,thisresearcherisexploringtheutilityofTOGAFarchitecturedomainsinaninstitutionalsetting.•  Intheresearch,theTOGAFEADwasexpandedtoaccommodateamodifiedformoftherecords/archivesandinformationlifecyclemodel.Thenormallifecyclemodelusuallyconstitutescreationorreceiptofrecordsorinformation,theircapture,storageandmaintenance,use,anddisposition.•  Themodifiedlifecyclewithintheinstitutionalsettinghasfourphases:

•  informationauthoring•  informationmanagement;•  recordsmanagement;and•  archivesmanagement.

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 14

Page 15: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

4.0 Design of an integrated TOGAF Framework •  Eachofthefourphasesofthelifecyclehasaswimlanethroughthefourlayersoftheframework.

•  Anadditionalswimlane,titledsupportingcapabilities,wasaddedtoaccommodateaspectsofthebusinesscapabilitiesthatcutacrossallfourphases

•  Theresultingframeworkfortheinstitutionhasanonymizednamesforapplicationsandtechnologies

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 15Source:MaldonyandKatuu2016

Page 16: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

4.0 Design of an integrated TOGAF Framework

•  Thegaponthefourthlayercausedconcernwhenbuildingthecomponentsoftheframework.

•  Asaresult,theinstitutionaldecisionwastodevelopmetadataattributestofacilitatetheassessmentofcontentintheotherlayers.

•  TheseattributeswereadaptedfromapreviousphaseoftheInterPARESprojectwhichhaddevelopedaframeworkforidentifyingauthenticitymetadata.

•  IntheInterPARESproject,themetadatacomponentsweremappedoverthreestagesofthelifecyclemodel.InordertoadapttothedatalayeroftheTOGAF,themetadataattributeswereextendedtocoverallfourswimlanes(InterPARES32012)

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 16

Theillustrationdemonstratesthemetadatacategoriesmappedoverthethreestagesoftherecordslifecycle.Source:Tennis,2006

Page 17: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

•  Theresultantmodelmappedthemetadatacategoriesacrossfourofthefiveswimlanes.

•  Identitymetadatae.g.•  Nameofauthor/writer•  Nameofaddress(ifapplicable)•  Nameoforiginator(ifapplicable)•  Nameofreceiver/recipient•  Nameofaction•  Indicationofformsofauthentication

•  Integritymetadatae.g.•  Indicationofprotectiveproceduresusedtoprevent

corruptionofthepresentedinformationasset•  indicationofanyredactionforprivacy,copyrightorany

otherreasons•  Recorddeclarationmetadatae.g.

•  Classificationcode•  Registrationnumber(i.e.uniqueidentifier)•  Nameofcreator•  Indicationofintellectualrights•  Nameofhandlingoffice•  Nameofofficeofprimaryresponsibility

17Source:Katuu2017

Page 18: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

4.0 Design of an integrated TOGAF Framework

•  Thedatalayer,whenincorporatedinthelargermodel,offersseveralbenefits.•  Itprovidesageneraloverviewofhowcomponentsinthelayersareconnected.•  Forinstitutionalstakeholders,thedatalayerprovidesanobjectiveandconsistentmannertoassessmetadatarequirementsimplementedinthebusinessapplicationsandtechnologyplatformsintheotherlayersoftheframework.

• Overall,theEAmodelprovidesanoverviewofhoweachofthecomponentsareconnectedandtowhatextenttheystraddleswimlanesintheframework

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 18

Page 19: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

5.0 Concluding Remarks •  Thispresentationisdrawnfromanongoingstudythatconstitutesfourphases,concentratingontheresearchdoneinthefirsttwophases.•  IthasdemonstratedhowanEAframeworkbasedontheTOGAFframeworkassessedaninstitutionalmodelwithfourlayers:(1)businesscapabilities;(2)application;(3)technology;and(4)data.Thedatalayerwasblank.Therefore,theresearchstudyofferedanopportunitytoadaptmetadatacategoriesandtypes.•  Asanongoingresearchprocess,thestudywillcontinuewiththethirdphasebycompletingthedesignoftheintegratedTOGAFconceptualmodel.Thismodelshouldbebuiltincrementallyasitconsiderstheconceptualcontributionfromrecordkeeping.ThefourthandfinalphasewouldvalidatetheintegratedTOGAFconceptualmodel.•  ThisstudydiffersfromtheworkcurrentlybeingundertakenbyISO’sTC46/SC11thathasalsochosenTOGAFtoexploreitsrelevancewithintherecordsandarchivesprofessioninthefollowingways:•  ThisstudylookedexclusivelyatTOGAF.TC46/SC11usedTOGAFinconjunctionwithArchiMate.•  ThisstudyexploredonepillarofTOGAF(i.e.,EAD)whileTC46/SC11usedadifferentpillar(i.e.ADM)

•  Finallythispresentationisademonstrationofhowrecordsandarchivesspecialistsareharnessingcomputationalmethods,inthiscaseEAthatfallswithinthesystemsthinkingapproach,intheirquesttofulfillingtheirprofessionalmandate.

UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 19

Page 20: The Utility of Enterprise Architecture to Records and

References •  Ahlemann,F.,Legner,C.,andSchafczuk,D.(2012)Introduction.InF.Ahlemann,E.Stettiner,M.Messerschmidt&C.Legner(Eds.),Strategic

enterprisearchitecturemanagement:challenges,bestpractices,andfuturedevelopments(pp.1-34).Dordrecht:SpringerScience&BusinessMedia.

•  Armour,F.J.,Kaisler,S.H.andLiu,S.Y.Abig-picturelookatenterprisearchitectures.ITprofessional,1,1(1999),35-42.•  Basten,D.,&Brons,D.(2012).EAframeworks,modelingandtools.InF.Ahlemann,E.Stettiner,M.Messerschmidt&C.Legner(Eds.),Strategic

enterprisearchitecturemanagement:challenges,bestpractices,andfuturedevelopments(pp.201-228).Dordrecht:SpringerScience&BusinessMedia.

•  Doucet,G.(2008)EnterpriseArchitectureattheGovernmentofCanada.InProceedingsoftheWorkshoponGovernmentEnterpriseArchitectureasEnablerofPublicSectorReformWashingtonDC,WorldBankGroup.

•  LocalGovernmentAssociationofTasmania,&SchoolofInformationSystems[UniversityofTasmania].(2003).InformationandKnowledgeManagementNationalScopingStudyRetrieved25thNovember,2018,fromhttp://www.lgat.tas.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/Information_Knowledge_Management_Report_v1a.PDF

•  IASASpain.(2014).IntroductiontoEnterpriseArchitectureandTOGAF9.1Retrieved25thNovember,2018,fromhttps://www.slideshare.net/iasaglobal/introduction-to-enterprise-architecture-and-togaf-91-38378019

•  InternationalStandardsOrganizationRecordsRequirementsinEnterpriseArchitecture.2018,fromhttps://committee.iso.org/sites/tc46sc11/home/projects/ongoing/records-requirements-in-enterpri.htmlGeneva,2018

•  InterPARES3Project:TEAMCanadaGeneralStudy15–ApplicationProfileforAuthenticityMetadata.2018,fromhttp://interpares.org/ip3/display_file.cfm?doc=ip3_canada_gs15_final_report.pdfInterPARES3Project,Vancouver,2012

•  Katuu,S.Facingthechallengesofmanagingrecordsintransactionalsystems.InProceedingsoftheinForum2017(Brisbane,Australia,10th-13thSeptember,2017).RecordsandInformationManagementProfessionalsAustralasia,2017.

•  Marciano,R.,Lemieux,V.,Hedges,M.,Esteva,M.,Underwood,W.,Kurtz,M.,&Conrad,M.(2018).Archivalrecordsandtrainingintheageofbigdata.InRe-envisioningtheMLS:PerspectivesontheFutureofLibraryandInformationScienceEducation(pp.179-199).EmeraldPublishingLimited.

•  Maldony,M.andKatuu,S.AssessingInformationSystems:ATemplateforAnalysis(TR04).InterPARESTrust,City,2016.•  Tennis,J.(2006).MetadatafortheLife-Cycle.Retrieved25thNovember,2018,from

http://www.interpares.org/display_file.cfm?doc=ip2_dissemination_cs_tennis_archiexpo_2006.pdf•  Weintrop,D.,Beheshti,E.,Horn,M.,Orton,K.,Jona,K.,Trouille,L.,&Wilensky,U.(2016).Definingcomputationalthinkingformathematicsand

scienceclassrooms.JournalofScienceEducationandTechnology,25(1),127-147.UtilityofEnterpriseArchitecture 20