The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for AggregateVIVA Presentation

MOHAMAD NAQIUDIN ZAINUDIN16814

IntroductionVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate

AdvantagesTypes of CeramicsAsphalt Road

Introduction

Advantage of ceramic• Light weight

• Withstand the oxidation and corrosion process

• Has high capability of storing heat

• Low in friction coefficient.

Asphalt road.The size, the number, and the continuity of the pores

• Strength of the aggregate,

• Abrasion resistance,

• Surface texture,

• Specific gravity,

• Bonding capabilities,

• and resistance to freezing and thawing action

ObjectivesVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate

Physical Properties Compressive

Strength Porosity

Identify the physical properties of ceramic material.

Determine the compressive strength of the material with addition of ceramic waste

To compare the porosity of the sample with the porosity of the conventional asphalt road (excluding porous asphalt).

Scope of StudiesVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate

Physical Properties Compressive

Strength Porosity

(Ramon et al., 2013) study the future of this material as in treatment of the waste in presents proportionally with natural aggregate in the asphalt mixture design.

Kruger and Solas, (2013) focus on the usage of the RCW on the road surface coarse due to its high degree of whiteness and hardness.

Use of ceramic waste as road surface before and after implementation

Literature ReviewVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate

Mechanical Properties

Leaching Behaviour Porosity Water Retention

Van de Van et al. (2011) use 15% of recycled ceramic aggregate(RCA) with the conventional aggregate and result in positive feedback for both mechanical properties and leaching behavior.

Selmo (1999) and Levy and Helene (1997), For bulk density of mortar which use recycled ceramic shows lower value than from using conventional mortars due to high porosity in the ceramic

Miranda and Selmo (1999) and Levy and Helene (1997), greater water retention in MRA with ceramic aggregate rather than MRA with aggregates from mortars and concrete.

Kikuchi et al. (1998) reported that 40% substitution of the ceramic aggregate with the natural one in the mortar sample will increase the shrinkage of MRA compared to the constant sample with no ceramic aggregate added but also has lower shrinkage of MRA at the initial stages.

MethodologyVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate

Flowchart Type of Test

Conducted JKR Standard

Study and Analyze the Properties of Material Used.

Determine the Size of Aggregate Used According to JKR Standard

Preparing Recycled Ceramic Waste(RCW) Sample

Conduct The Aggregate Test and Collecting Data

Determine the Optimum Bitumen Content (OBC)

PHYSICAL

SPECIFIC GRAVITY & WATER ABSORPTION

SIEVE ANALYSIS

ELONGATION & FLAKINESS INDEX

MECHANICAL

LA ABRASSION TEST

AGGREGATE IMPACT VALUE

MARSHALL TEST

BS Sieve Size

(mm)

 

Percentage Passing by Weight

  A B C D

37.5 100 100 100 100

12.5 45-47 55-85 60-100 -

4.75 30-60 35-65 50-85 55-90

2.00 20-45 25-50 40-70 40-70

0.425 15-30 15-30 25-45 20-50

0.075 8-20 8-20 8-20 8-25

The particle size shall be determined by the washing and sieving method of BS

1377

Gradation Limit For Gravel Surfacing According to JKR Standard

Physical Test for Aggregate

Flakiness Index and Elongation Index• Flakiness and elongation of the

aggregates• Value to measure• Flakiness • Elongation

Physical Test for Aggregate

Specific Gravity and Water Absorption Test• Bulk and apparent specific

gravity• Absorption of water• Value to measure:• Water absorption in mass• Density of sample

Physical Test for Aggregate

Sieve Analysis• Analyze the type of

gradation the aggregate belongs• Value to measure:• Aggregate size in

(mm).

Mechanical Test for Aggregate

Los Angeles Abrasion Test• The difficulty with

aggregates particles are likely to wear.

• Value to measure:• Percentage of weight

(%)

Mechanical Test for Aggregate

Aggregate Impact Value Test• Toughness of aggregate due

to impact• Value to measure• Percentage of weight (%)

Result & DiscussionVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate

Sieve Analysis Flakiness & Elongation Specific Gravity Water Absorption OBC

Sieve Analysis Result

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Specific Gravity and Absorption Test

Test 1 Test 2 N/A

8.87%

6.65%

1.17%

Water absorption (% of dry mass)

Test 1 Test 2 N/A

2.21

2.36

2.63

Apparent particle density

Flakiness & Elongation Index

RCW-1 RCW-2 RCW-3 NA0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Flakiness & Elongation Index

Flakiness Index (%) Elongation Index (%)

Marshall Test

3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.50

0.51

1.52

2.5

Density

BITUMEN CONTENT(%)

dE

NS

ITY

3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.505

1015202530

Porosity

bITUMEN CONTENT(%)

pO

RO

SIT

Y

3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.50

1

2

3

4

Flow

bITUMEN CONTENT(%)

FLO

W

3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.50

2

4

6

8

10

Marshall Stability

bitumen content(%)

mars

hall

stab

ility

3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.50

2

4

6

8

10

Actual Marshall Stability

BITUMEN CONTEN(%)M

AR

SH

ALL

STA

BIL

ITY(k

N)

ConclusionVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate

Conclusion

• Further test require to pin-point the exact quantity and measurement to get optimum percentage of Ceramic to be used to be replaced with the conventional aggregate.

• This is to determine the exact data that are which are more consistent and reliable.

Q & A