The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for AggregateVIVA Presentation
MOHAMAD NAQIUDIN ZAINUDIN16814
IntroductionVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate
AdvantagesTypes of CeramicsAsphalt Road
Introduction
Advantage of ceramic• Light weight
• Withstand the oxidation and corrosion process
• Has high capability of storing heat
• Low in friction coefficient.
Asphalt road.The size, the number, and the continuity of the pores
• Strength of the aggregate,
• Abrasion resistance,
• Surface texture,
• Specific gravity,
• Bonding capabilities,
• and resistance to freezing and thawing action
ObjectivesVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate
Physical Properties Compressive
Strength Porosity
Identify the physical properties of ceramic material.
Determine the compressive strength of the material with addition of ceramic waste
To compare the porosity of the sample with the porosity of the conventional asphalt road (excluding porous asphalt).
Scope of StudiesVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate
Physical Properties Compressive
Strength Porosity
(Ramon et al., 2013) study the future of this material as in treatment of the waste in presents proportionally with natural aggregate in the asphalt mixture design.
Kruger and Solas, (2013) focus on the usage of the RCW on the road surface coarse due to its high degree of whiteness and hardness.
Use of ceramic waste as road surface before and after implementation
Literature ReviewVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate
Mechanical Properties
Leaching Behaviour Porosity Water Retention
Van de Van et al. (2011) use 15% of recycled ceramic aggregate(RCA) with the conventional aggregate and result in positive feedback for both mechanical properties and leaching behavior.
Selmo (1999) and Levy and Helene (1997), For bulk density of mortar which use recycled ceramic shows lower value than from using conventional mortars due to high porosity in the ceramic
Miranda and Selmo (1999) and Levy and Helene (1997), greater water retention in MRA with ceramic aggregate rather than MRA with aggregates from mortars and concrete.
Kikuchi et al. (1998) reported that 40% substitution of the ceramic aggregate with the natural one in the mortar sample will increase the shrinkage of MRA compared to the constant sample with no ceramic aggregate added but also has lower shrinkage of MRA at the initial stages.
MethodologyVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate
Flowchart Type of Test
Conducted JKR Standard
Study and Analyze the Properties of Material Used.
Determine the Size of Aggregate Used According to JKR Standard
Preparing Recycled Ceramic Waste(RCW) Sample
Conduct The Aggregate Test and Collecting Data
Determine the Optimum Bitumen Content (OBC)
PHYSICAL
SPECIFIC GRAVITY & WATER ABSORPTION
SIEVE ANALYSIS
ELONGATION & FLAKINESS INDEX
MECHANICAL
LA ABRASSION TEST
AGGREGATE IMPACT VALUE
MARSHALL TEST
BS Sieve Size
(mm)
Percentage Passing by Weight
A B C D
37.5 100 100 100 100
12.5 45-47 55-85 60-100 -
4.75 30-60 35-65 50-85 55-90
2.00 20-45 25-50 40-70 40-70
0.425 15-30 15-30 25-45 20-50
0.075 8-20 8-20 8-20 8-25
The particle size shall be determined by the washing and sieving method of BS
1377
Gradation Limit For Gravel Surfacing According to JKR Standard
Physical Test for Aggregate
Flakiness Index and Elongation Index• Flakiness and elongation of the
aggregates• Value to measure• Flakiness • Elongation
Physical Test for Aggregate
Specific Gravity and Water Absorption Test• Bulk and apparent specific
gravity• Absorption of water• Value to measure:• Water absorption in mass• Density of sample
Physical Test for Aggregate
Sieve Analysis• Analyze the type of
gradation the aggregate belongs• Value to measure:• Aggregate size in
(mm).
Mechanical Test for Aggregate
Los Angeles Abrasion Test• The difficulty with
aggregates particles are likely to wear.
• Value to measure:• Percentage of weight
(%)
Mechanical Test for Aggregate
Aggregate Impact Value Test• Toughness of aggregate due
to impact• Value to measure• Percentage of weight (%)
Result & DiscussionVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate
Sieve Analysis Flakiness & Elongation Specific Gravity Water Absorption OBC
Sieve Analysis Result
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Specific Gravity and Absorption Test
Test 1 Test 2 N/A
8.87%
6.65%
1.17%
Water absorption (% of dry mass)
Test 1 Test 2 N/A
2.21
2.36
2.63
Apparent particle density
Flakiness & Elongation Index
RCW-1 RCW-2 RCW-3 NA0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Flakiness & Elongation Index
Flakiness Index (%) Elongation Index (%)
Marshall Test
3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.50
0.51
1.52
2.5
Density
BITUMEN CONTENT(%)
dE
NS
ITY
3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.505
1015202530
Porosity
bITUMEN CONTENT(%)
pO
RO
SIT
Y
3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.50
1
2
3
4
Flow
bITUMEN CONTENT(%)
FLO
W
3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.50
2
4
6
8
10
Marshall Stability
bitumen content(%)
mars
hall
stab
ility
3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.50
2
4
6
8
10
Actual Marshall Stability
BITUMEN CONTEN(%)M
AR
SH
ALL
STA
BIL
ITY(k
N)
ConclusionVIVA Presentation: The Use of Ceramic as a Substitute for Aggregate
Conclusion
• Further test require to pin-point the exact quantity and measurement to get optimum percentage of Ceramic to be used to be replaced with the conventional aggregate.
• This is to determine the exact data that are which are more consistent and reliable.
Q & A