the state university of new york facilities master plan
DESCRIPTION
The State University of New York Facilities Master Plan. Presented by the State University Construction Fund PPAA Winter Conference January 31, 2012. “Plans are nothing; planning is everything.” Dwight D. Eisenhower. Facilities Master Plan – Initiative:. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
FACILITIES MASTER PLAN
Presented by the
State University Construction FundPPAA Winter Conference
January 31, 2012
1
“Plans are nothing; planning is everything.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower
2
In 2009, the Fund commissioned consultants to undertake facilities master planning on 32 campuses simultaneously, within a fixed budget and fixed schedule.
The Facilities Master Plans (FMPs) were completed on time and under budget, and have transformed the way we integrate academic and facilities condition needs in capital planning.
The FMPs are not the next capital plan, but are our road map to applying capital resources to their highest and best use.
The purpose of the FMPs is to identify, prioritize, and sequence future construction projects that support the academic mission of SUNY and its member colleges.
3
FACILITIES MASTER PLAN – INITIATIVE:
SYSTEM-WIDE TRENDS:
4
Demographics & Enrollment
Facility Conditions
Facility Needs
SUNY Space Guidelines
FMP Budget
5
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 20220
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
NYS HS Grad Projections
HS Grads to Higher Ed. Total
HS Grads to NYS Higher Ed.
SUNY Share of HS Grads
HS Grads to State Ops Only
Sources: WICH -"Knocking at the College Door"NYSED, ORIS - Dec 2011US Dept Ed. NCES 2011-12
System Wide Trends: DEMOGRAPHICS
High School Graduation - Demographics
System Wide Trends: DEMOGRAPHICS Declining NYS HS grad. rates due to falling birth rates
Upstate versus downstate demographics
Loss of State Ops market share to Comm. Colleges
Students leaving ‘Privates’ due to affordability
Education Pipeline increasing yield
Out-of-State Students
International students
Non-traditional learners
6
7
COMPETITION – NYS HIGHER EDUCATION
2000 2005 2010 -
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
Private CollegesSUNY Community CollegesSUNY State OpsCUNYPropriety Colleges
Historical Enrollment trends – First Time/Full Time Freshman enrollment
System-Wide Trends: FMP ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Majority of SUNY Campuses aspire to grow
Growth rates vary by sector
Most campuses plan to recruit from downstate
Projected growth versus declining NYS demographic
Strong internal competition for students is expected
Affordability of growth, allocation of resources & budget
8
FMP ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
9
Base 2012 2013 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022140,000
150,000
160,000
170,000
180,000
190,000
200,000
210,000
220,000
230,000
240,000
FMP Projected total SUNY State Ops
Total Enrollment tracking Demographics
In aggregate, SUNY State Ops, in the FMP, aspire to grow by 39,000
If State Ops enrollment follows Demographics, total enrollment may decline by 36,000
System Wide Trends: FACILITY CONDITIONS FMP Consultants conducted building condition
assessments as part of their scope of services
Update of the BCAS was not part of the FMP
The FMP confirmed the validity of 2007 BCAS methodology
Results of 2011 survey and backlog reduction
40% of the current 5-year CM plan has not yet hit construction
10
11
2007-08 Backlog 2011-12 Estimated Backlog + Escalation
2011-12 Actual and Reduced backlog
$-
$0.50 B
$1.00 B
$1.50 B
$2.00 B
$2.50 B
$3.00 B
$3.50 B
$4.00 B
$4.50 BBCAS & Backlog Reduction
2007 BCAS Backlog Brought Forward
2007 BCASBacklog
$2.46B$2.46B
12
2007-08 Backlog 2011-12 Estimated Backlog + Escalation
2011-12 Actual and Reduced backlog
$-
$0.50 B
$1.00 B
$1.50 B
$2.00 B
$2.50 B
$3.00 B
$3.50 B
$4.00 B
$4.50 BBCAS & Backlog Reduction
2007 BCASBacklog
2007 BCASBacklog
New Back-log and
Cost Esca-lation
$2.46B $2.46B
$1.69B
13
2007-08 Backlog 2011-12 Estimated Backlog + Escalation
2011-12 Actual and Reduced backlog
$-
$0.50 B
$1.00 B
$1.50 B
$2.00 B
$2.50 B
$3.00 B
$3.50 B
$4.00 B
$4.50 BBCAS & Backlog Reduction
2007 BCASBacklog
2007 BCASBacklog
New Back-log and
Cost Esca-lation
2011 BCAS Preliminary Assessment
$2.46B
$1.69B
$2.46B $2.42B
14
2007-08 Backlog 2011-12 Estimated Backlog + Escalation
2011-12 Actual and Reduced backlog
$-
$0.50 B
$1.00 B
$1.50 B
$2.00 B
$2.50 B
$3.00 B
$3.50 B
$4.00 B
$4.50 B
BCAS and Backlog Reduction
New Backlog and Cost Es-
calation
2007 BCASBacklog
2007 BCASBacklog
2011 BCAS Preliminary Assessment
Estimated Back-log Reduction of
$1.73B
$1.69B
$2.46B $2.46B $2.42B
Consultant observations during execution of FMP:
PSI records generally in poor condition Lack of course & section analysis system – classroom use SUNY Space Guidelines - obsolete Classroom and Lab station sizes don’t support problem
based learning Research Space allocation/modeling is obsolete Modern student expectations of student life have changed Evolution of libraries - less books, more collaborative learning
space 15
System Wide Trends: SUNY SPACE GUIDELINES & PSI
Consultant recommendations:
Overhaul, update & simplify SUNY Space Guidelines
Overhaul PSI, adopt FICM and Federal Standards
Drop (arbitrary) 18% DOB utilization premium
Develop goals/standards for research space
Acknowledge changes in pedagogy
Better serve student services & student activity spaces
16
System Wide Trends: SUNY SPACE GUIDELINES & PSI
Provide Facilities to accommodate growth & change Address building flexibility & adaptability issues Adapt classroom inventories for current pedagogy Adapt to evolving libraries & learning spaces Grow research & link to economic development Provide one-stop student service centers Better serve Intercollegiate athletics & recreation Support recruitment and retention efforts
17
System Wide Trends: FACILITY NEEDS
$23 Million Statewide FMP Budget generated $26 Billion in planned projects through 2023 and beyond
FMP provides a toolkit for program-driven capital needs
This year’s capital planning process will integrate pure CM needs
18
System Wide Trends: FMP BUDGET
FMP Budget
2013-2018FMP Budget2018-2023
FMP Budget2023 and beyond Totals
University Centers & other Doctoral 5.8 4.8 7.0 17.6
Comprehensives 2.4 2.4 .9 5.7Tech Sector 1.1 1.0 .6 2.7
Totals 9.3 8.2 8.5 26.0
19
System Wide Trends: SUMMARY Most campuses aspire to grow
Demographic conditions are not favorable
There will be strong internal and external competition for students
Growth may need to be strategic
Capital resources must be applied to highest and best use
Effective planning is essential
University CentersComprehensive CollegesTechnology Colleges
20
TRENDS BY SECTOR:
19% average projected enrollment
growth. (11.1% without B.U)
Overall average growth rate skewed
by Binghamton University planned
aggressive growth
Most of the growth rate is still
planned to be NYS HS graduates
University Centers recruit
proportionally more students out of
state and internationally
21
University Centers: FMP ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
Base 2013 2018 202370,000
75,000
80,000
85,000
90,000
95,000
100,000
University CentersWithout Binghamton
Allocation of space for research
Strong need for integrated research facilities
Space needs for Division I athletics and recreation
Economies of scale – generally better building conditions
Larger capital plans - numerous full building renovations
Site infrastructure problems remain
22
University Centers: UNIQUE ISSUES
University Centers:
23
24
Comprehensive Colleges: FMP ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
Average Projected Growth 7.9% (Empire State excluded)
Campuses in largest metro areas plan strongest growth rates
Established, reputable specialty programs attract and retain students
Base 2013 2018 20230
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
Enrollment Projections
SUNY Space Guidelines more closely represent Comprehensive Colleges
Adequate space to support renovations
Transitions in use of class labs
Emerging changes in research
Historic preservation issues – “Old Mains”
Improve and expand recreation facilities for non-athletes
Consolidate academic program spaces
Establish one-stop service centers25
Comprehensive Colleges: UNIQUE ISSUES
Comprehensive Colleges:
26
Average Projected Enrollment Growth of 25%
Continued development of baccalaureate programs
Desired increased selectivity
Majority of student population is recruited regionally
Goals: increase number of transfer students from community colleges and increase range of recruitment
Greater % of first-generation, college-bound students
27
Technology Colleges: FMP ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
Base 2013 2018 20230
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Enrollment Projections
Relatively higher deferred maintenance backlog
Smaller campuses lack flexibility to implement renewal
Higher ASF/ FTE ratio - specialty “hands-on” programs & smaller classes
Traditional and unique learning environments & non-standard scheduling
Technology colleges are inadequately served by outdated space factors for support space
28
Technology Colleges: UNIQUE ISSUES
Expansion into 4-year institution - Student Unions, Recreation and Athletic facilities
Vocational education & public / private partnering often use non-state owned facilities
With enrollment growth, need for increased residential facilities
Critical maintenance allocations are challenging for technology colleges
29
Technology Colleges: UNIQUE ISSUES
Technology Colleges:
3030
FMP FUTURE:
31
The Facility Master Plan has acknowledged each
institution’s mission, strategic vision, and projected growth
assessments.
It has crafted a facility planning document to assist in guiding
the institution in developing a prioritized capital plan
maximizing capital expenditures meeting both academic
mission objectives and stewardship responsibilities,
supporting both growth and facility renewal.
32
Thank You!
Questions
33