the relative significance of epas in asia-pacific · 2015. 11. 24. · india’s contribution in...
TRANSCRIPT
29 October 2011
The Relative Significance of EPAs
in Asia-Pacific
10 November 2015
Kenichi Kawasaki
GRIPS/JIIA/RIETI
• TPP and RCEP are shown to complement each other rather than be competitors toward the establishment of FTAAP.
• Trade diversion effects will deteriorate the economic welfare of the non-member economies of regional EPAs.
• Larger economic benefits are expected from NTMs reductions in addition to tariff removals.
• ASEAN countries and others will primarily benefit from their own EPA policy measures.
• East Asian economies would remain benefit largely from future trade liberalization.
1
OverviewThe relative significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific
Estimated impacts of EPAsEstimated economic impacts of trade liberalization are compared with business as usual without liberalization at some time in the future.Those will be achieved over medium-term, after around 10 years.
Economic impacts of trade liberalization
2
Trade liberalization Future
Withoit trade liberalization
With trade liberalization
GDP
Impacts (%)
_______________Source: Author
Regional integration in Asia-Pacific Negotiations on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) began in 2013.The members of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) have increased.
Framework of EPAs in Asia-Pacific
3
_______________Source: Author’s compilation
Hong Kong, China
Chinese Taipei China
Russia Korea
US Japan India
Canada Australia
Mexico New Zealand
Chile
Peru Burunei
Malaysia
Singapore
Viet Nam
Papua New Guinea Indonesia Cambodia
Philippines Laos
Thailand Myanmar
APEC
RCEP
TPP
ASEAN
Impacts of Asia-Pacific EPAs: JapanHigher levels of achievement in TPP including NTMs reductions.Larger gains from RCEP by growing and large Asian markets.Complementary benefits from FTAAP participating in TPP and RCEP.
Japan’s income gains from the Asia-Pacific EPAs
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
TPP12 RCEP FTAAP
% of GDP
Tariff removals
Tariff removals and NTMs reductions
4
________________Sources: Kawasaki (2015), “The Relative Significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific”, Journal of Asian Economics 39
Japan’s source of economic benefitsJapan’s own contribution will be relatively large in TPP.China’s contribution will be major in RCEP.Japan’s gains from FTAAP will largely be given by Japan an China.
Contributions to Japan’s income gains by economies
0
20
40
60
80
100
TPP
Tariff +NTMs
RCEP
Tariff +NTMs
FTAAP
Tariff +NTMs
%
Malaysia US Russia China Japan
5
________________Sources: Kawasaki (2015), “The Relative Significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific”, Journal of Asian Economics 39
Impacts of Asia-Pacific EPAs: USIncome gains from TPP mainly from NTMs reductions.Income losses from RCEP due to trade diversion effectsMuch larger economic benefits from FTAAP than from TPP.
US’ income gains from the Asia-Pacific EPAs
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
TPP12 RCEP FTAAP
% of GDP
Tariff removals
Tariff removals and NTMs reductions
6
________________Sources: Kawasaki (2015), “The Relative Significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific”, Journal of Asian Economics 39
US’ source of economic benefitsJapan’s contribution to tariff removals will be large in TPP.Meanwhile, the US’s own NTMs reductions will be significant.Income gains from FTAAP will firstly be influenced by China.
Contributions to US’ income gains by economies
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
TPP
Tariff +NTMs
RCEP
Tariff +NTMs
FTAAP
Tariff +NTMs
%
Japan Mexico Russia US China
7
________________Sources: Kawasaki (2015), “The Relative Significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific”, Journal of Asian Economics 39
Impacts of Asia-Pacific EPAs: ChinaIncome losses from TPP due to trade diversion effects.Large gains from RCEP, in which tariff removals remain important.Further income gains from FTAAP expanding the members of EPAs.
China’s income gains from the Asia-Pacific EPAs
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
TPP12 RCEP FTAAP
% of GDP
Tariff removals
Tariff removals and NTMs reductions
8
________________Sources: Kawasaki (2015), “The Relative Significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific”, Journal of Asian Economics 39
China’s source of economic benefitsIncome gains from FTAAP will primarily be driven by own measures.India’s contribution in RCEP and Russia’s contribution in FTAAP will be noted.
Contributions to China’s income gains by economies
0
20
40
60
80
100
TPP
Tariff +NTMs
RCEP
Tariff +NTMs
FTAAP
Tariff +NTMs
%
Japan India US Russia China
9
________________Sources: Kawasaki (2015), “The Relative Significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific”, Journal of Asian Economics 39
Impacts of Asia-Pacific EPAs: Chinese TaipeiIncome losses from TPP due to trade diversion effects.Much larger income losses from RCEP.Significant economic benefits from FTAAP.
Chinese Taipei’s income gains from the Asia-Pacific EPAs
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
TPP12 RCEP FTAAP
% of GDP
Tariff removals
Tariff removals and NTMs reductions
10
________________Sources: Kawasaki (2015), “The Relative Significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific”, Journal of Asian Economics 39
Impacts of Asia-Pacific EPAs: EUMay benefit from the spill-over effects of NTMs reductions.However, income losses from FTAAP will be sizable compared with expected gains from TTIP and EU-Japan EPA.
EU’s income losses from the Asia-Pacific EPAs
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
TPP12 RCEP FTAAP
% of GDP
Tariff removals
Tariff removals and NTMs reductions
11
________________Sources: Kawasaki (2015), “The Relative Significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific”, Journal of Asian Economics 39
Significance of domestic reforms in FTAAPIn ASEAN countries and others, contributions through their own initiatives will be much larger than those by partners in FTAAP.
Contributions to income gains from FTAAP by own policies
0
20
40
60
80
100
%
Tariff removals
Tariff removals and NTMs
reductions
12
________________Sources: Kawasaki (2015), “The Relative Significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific”, Journal of Asian Economics 39
Tariff concessions in East AsiaTariff concessions in East Asian EPAs have not substantially been high enough in effect.
Comparison of tariff concessions
0
20
40
60
80
100
%Numbers of commodoties Average tariff rates
13
________________Sources: Authors’ estimates