THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEACHING READING

TECHNIQUES FOR THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS

AT SMAN 1 SRESEH

THESIS

By:

Sullah

201510100311108

ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG

2021

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEACHING READING

TECHNIQUES FOR THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS

AT SMAN 1 SRESEH

THESIS

This thesis is submitted to meet one of the requirements to achieve

Sarjana Degree in English Language Education

By:

Sullah

201510100311108

ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG

2021

i

This thesis was written by Sullah and was approved on January 25, 2021

By:

Advisor II, Advisor I,

Khoiriyah, S.Pd., M.A. Masyhud, M.Pd.

ii

UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN

PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS Kampus III: Jl. Raya Tlogomas No. 246 Malang Telp (0341) 464318 - 319 Ext. 121 Malang 65144

E-mail: b.inggris@umm.ac.id / Website: www.english.umm.ac.id

SURAT KETERANGAN E.5.a/58/B.Ing-FKIP/UMM/II/2021

Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:

Nama : Bayu Hendro Wicaksono, M.Ed.,Ph.D

Jabatan : Ketua Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

Menerangkan bahwa mahasiswa:

Nama : Sullah

NIM : 201510100311108

Judul Skripsi : The Implementation of Teaching Reading

Techniques for the First Year Students at SMAN 1

Sreseh

adalah benar-benar mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FKIP-

UMM yang telah melaksanakan proses ujian skripsi pada Periode I 2021.

Mahasiswa tersebut telah dinyatakan lulus ujian skripsi dengan nilai B dan telah

melakukan revisi yang telah disetujui oleh para penguji.

Demikian surat keterangan ini dibuat, agar digunakan sebagaimana semestinya.

Malang, 15 Februari 202 1

Ketua Prodi,

Bayu Hendro Wicaksono, M.Ed., Ph.D

iii

III

Sullah

declare hereby I th my work and is at this thesis's intellectual content has the product of

or been submitted to any other University Institution.

I certify that , of the best to my knowledge, my thesis does not infringe upon anyone ' s

that any ideas copyright nor violate any proprietary rights and , techniques , any quotations, or

other other material from the work of people included in my thesis , otherwise published or , are

standard referencing practices. fully acknowledged following the

J also declare that this is a true copy of m~ thesis , approved by my thesis committee as

and English Language Education Department office. the

DECLARATION OF AUTHOR'S ORIGINALITY

iv

MOTTO AND DEDICATION

“خَيْرُ النَّاسِ أنَْفعَهُُمْ لِلنَّاسِ “

“Sebaik-baik manusia adalah mereka yang memberikan manfaat untuk orang

lain.”

I dedicated this work to:

My Beloved Father (Saliwan)

My Beloved Mother (Rohmah)

My Brother and My Sister (Hilmi and Maisuroh)

v

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEACHING READING TECHNIQUES

FOR THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS AT SMAN 1 SRESEH

ABSTRACT

The implementation of teaching reading focuses on the importance of the

teaching techniques used by the teacher. This research was conducted to determine

the teaching techniques used by teachers who taught in the 10th grade at SMAN 1

Sreseh. The use of reading teaching techniques can help students find ideas,

understand the material, and read well.

The research was conducted at SMAN 1 Sreseh. There was one teacher as

a research subject and twenty-five students in grade X IPS. This study used a

descriptive qualitative design to obtain information about the teaching techniques

used by the teacher. After that, to collect data, the researcher used an observation

checklist as the first instrument. The second instrument was the interview guide.

This study showed that there are several techniques used by teachers when

teaching reading. There are phonics, whole-word, language experience, context

support, teach close reading, and vary text length. The teacher implemented the

teaching techniques to help students find ideas in the reading. By applying various

teaching techniques, students are encouraged to comprehend the vocabulary and

grammar at a deeper level. The use of appropriate teaching techniques improves

students’ participation and activeness during the learning has to adjust the material.

Therefore, the teacher has to select the most suitable teaching techniques to boost

students' performance.

Keywords: teaching techniques, teaching reading.

Advisor 1 The Researcher

Masyhud, M.Pd. Sullah

vi

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Alhamdulillah and thanks for the praise from Allah SWT who given

guidance and blessing so that the writer can finish this thesis. Those are perfect

words that the writer revealed for this thesis with the title “The Implementation of

Teaching Reading Techniques for The First-Year Students at SMAN 1 Sreseh”.

The writer would like to express his gratitude to Masyhud, S.Pd., M.Pd. as

the first advisor, and Khoiriyah, S.Pd., M.A. as the second advisor. Invaluable

advice and guidance during the consultation period in the completion of this thesis.

Finally, the writer expressed his deepest gratitude to my beloved father, my

beloved mother, brother, and sister for giving prayers and encouragement during

the thesis period. The writer also thanks to his beloved friends who have given

moral support during the thesis period. The writer hopes this thesis can be useful

for readers.

Malang, January 25, 2021

The Writer

Sullah

vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

This thesis was written by Sullah and was approved on January 25, 2021 ............. i

MOTTO AND DEDICATION .............................................................................. iv

ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................ v

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................... vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................... vii

CHAPTER I ............................................................................................................ 1

INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1

1.1 The background of the study ............................................................................ 1

1.2 The Research Problem ..................................................................................... 4

1.3 The Research Objective ................................................................................... 4

1.4 The Scope and Limitation ................................................................................ 4

1.5 The Significance of the Study .......................................................................... 4

1.6 The Definition of Key Terms ........................................................................... 6

CHAPTER II ........................................................................................................... 7

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE .............................................................. 7

2.1 Implementation of Teaching Technique Reading .......................................... 7

2.2 The Use of Teaching Reading Technique ...................................................... 8

2.3 The Several Techniques of Teaching Reading ............................................... 9

2.3.1 The lecture technique ............................................................................ 9

2.3.2 The task or recitation technique ............................................................ 9

2.3.3 The discussion technique ....................................................................... 9

2.3.4 The demonstration technique .............................................................. 10

2.3.5 The problem-solving technique ........................................................... 10

2.3.6 The question and answer technique ..................................................... 10

CHAPTER III ....................................................................................................... 11

RESEARCH METHOD ........................................................................................ 11

3.1 Research Design ........................................................................................... 11

3.2 Research Subject .......................................................................................... 11

3.3 Data Collection............................................................................................... 12

3.3.1 Technique and Instrument ................................................................... 12

3.3.2 Observation ......................................................................................... 12

3.3.3 Semi-Structured Interview Guide ........................................................ 13

3.3.4 Procedure ............................................................................................. 14

3.4 Data Analysis ................................................................................................. 14

CHAPTER IV ....................................................................................................... 15

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS ........................................................................ 15

4.1 Research Findings ........................................................................................ 15

4.1.1 The Kind of Techniques Used in Teaching Reading ........................... 15

4.1.2 The implementation of teaching techniques of reading ....................... 16

4.2 Discussions ..................................................................................................... 22

CHAPTER V ......................................................................................................... 25

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ................................................................. 25

5.1 Conclusion .................................................................................................... 25

5.2 Suggestions ................................................................................................... 25

References ............................................................................................................. 27

APPENDIX I: Research Permission Letter........................................................... 30

APPENDIX II: InterviewTranscription………………………………………….32

27

References

Albers, M. J. (2017). Quantitative data analysis in the graduate curriculum. Journal

of Technical Writing and Communication, 47(2), 215–233.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281617692067

Arinda, Y., Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). The application Group

Investigation ( GI ) learning model-assisted phet to facilitate student scientific

work skills. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(2), 254–

261.

Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching reading.

ELT Journal, 54(4), 153–160.

Balackova, H. (2004). Foresight Methodologies (second edition). Retrieved April

11, 2019, from https://www.academia.edu/37234700/

Longman_Dictionary_of_Language_Teaching Berninger, V. W., et al. (2002). Writing and reading : Language by hand and

language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1).

ps://doi.other/10.1177/002221940203500104

Budd, J. W. (2010). Mind maps as classroom exercises. The Journal Economic

Education, (October 2014), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.35.1.35-46

Cesur, M. O. (2011). Can language learning strategies predict Turkish university

prep class students ’ achievement in reading comprehension? Procedia -

Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1920–1924.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.028

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design : Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed

methods approach. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education,

35(2), 2–4.

Dinham, S. (2013). The quality teaching movement in Australia encounters difficult

terrain: A personal perspective. Australian Journal of Education, 57(2), 91–

106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944113485840

Dogru, M. (2008). The application of the problem-solving Method on science

teacher trainees on the solution of the environmental problems. Journal of

Environmental and Science Education, 3(1), 9–18.

Ellison, J. G. (2009). Increasing problem-solving skills in fifth grade advanced

mathematics students. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 3(1), 15–31.

https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.2009.v3n1p15-31

Ghabanchi, Z., & Behrooznia, S. (2014). The impact of brainstorming on reading

comprehension and critical thinking ability of EFL learners. Procedia - Social

28

and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 513–521.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.447

Ginting, M. K. Br. (2013). Efektivitas model mind Map dalam meningkatkan

kemampuan menulis artikel oleh siswa kelas XI SMA Swasta Rakyat Sei

Gelugur Tahun Pembelajaran 2012/2013.

Hackathorn, J., Solomon, E. D., & Blankmeyer, K. L. (2011). Learning by doing :

An empirical study of active teaching techniques. The Journal of Effective

Teaching, 11(2), 40–54.

Hockicko, P., Krišt, L., & Miroslav, N. (2014). Development of students ’

conceptual thinking using video analysis and interactive simulations at

technical universities. European Journal of Engineering, (November 2014),

37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.941337

Isye, M. (2009). Penerapan model writing workshop untuk meningkatkan

kemampuan menulis bahasa Inggris siswa kelas XII IPS SMAN 11 Bandung.

Jurnal Penelitian, 10(2), 1–13.

Jones, B. D., et al. (2012). The effects of mind mapping activities on students'

motivation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and

Learning, 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060105

Juriah. (2015). Implementing controlled composition to improve vocabulary

mastery of EFL students. Dinamika Ilmu, 15(1), 137–162.

Khoii, R. (2011). A solution to the dilemma of reading in a foreign language :

Adaptive mentorship. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects

in Education (IGCSE), 2(4), 493–501.

Lambert, V. A., & Clinton, E. L. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research : An

acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research,

16(4), 255–256.

Litcanu, M., et al. (2015). Brain-Writing vs brainstorming case study for power

engineering education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 387–

390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.452

Mitchell, M. G., & Holder, M. (2008). Group investigation as a cooperative learning

strategy : An integrated analysis of the literature. The Alberta Journal of

Educational Research, 54(4), 388–395.

Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps:

A meta-analysis. Review of Education Research, 76(3), 413–448.

Oktavia, W., Martono, Wartiningsih, A. (2016). Penerapan teknik brainwriting

untuk meningkatkan menulis wacana narasi pada siswa kelas XI TPHP

SMK, 1–15. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tanjungpura University,

Pontianak, Indonesia.

29

Onkas, N. A. (2017). Interpretation theory and creative reading. The

Anthropologist, 73(2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891869

Parke, D. J. (2008). Participant and non-participant observation in gambling.

Machine Gamblers, 1(1), 61–74.

Pathak, A., & Intratat, C. (2012). Use of semi-structured interviews to investigate

teacher perceptions of student collaboration. Malaysian Journal of ELT

Research, 8(1), 1–10.

Prasasti, S. R. (2015). The effectiveness of TTW (Think-Talk-Write) strategy in

teaching reading descriptive text. Journal of English Language and Learning,

2(2), 299–304.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Language Teaching & Applied

Linguistics (Fourth Edi). Retrieved June 1, 2019, from www. foresight. pl

Saygili, D. S. (2017). Examining the problem-solving skills and the strategies used

by high school students in solving non-routine problems. E-International

Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 91–114.

Widodo, H. P. (2008). Process-Based academic essay reading instruction. Bahasa

Dan Seni, 36(1).

Witte, T. C. H., & Jansen, E. P. W. A. (2015). In search of the excellent literature

teacher: An inductive approach to constructing professional teaching

standards. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(5), 565–583.

Yuniarti, N., & Setiawan, B. (2013). Menulis cerita pendek dengan menggunakan

metode peta pikiran ( Mind Mapping ) pada siswa selas IX A SMP Negeri 9

Pontianak. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 1(1), 125–139.

Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed method research : instruments, validity, reliability, and

reporting findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254–262.

https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262

30

PENDIDI ’ N AJYSA lNGGit IS

•...+- p

UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN

PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BADASA INGGRIS Kampus III: .11. Ray a Tlopomas No. 246 Malang Telp (fl341) 4643 lS - 319 Ext. 121 Malang 65144

E-mail: b.in crisp umm.ac.id / Website: uvv .english.urnm.ac.id

LEMBAR HASIL CEK PLAGIASI

Koordinator Plagiasi Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FKIP UMM menyatakan bahwa:

’Nama

*NIM

Sullah

201510100311108

Telah melakukan uji kesamaan Karya Ilmiah dalam bentuk Tugas Akhir (Skripsi) dengan hasil sebagai

berikut:

Bagian Skripsi (CHAPTER) Prosentase Hasil Kesamaan

CHAPTER I Introduction 3%

CHAPTER II Review of Related Literature 3%

CHAPTER III Research Method 24%

CHAPTER IV Findings and Discussion 6%

CHAPTER V Conclusion and Suggestions 5%

Berdasarkan prosentase hasil uji kesamaan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa hasil deteksi plagiasi telah

memenuhi syarat dan ketentuan yang telah diatur pada Peraturan Rektor No. 2 Tahun 2017.

Malang, 20 Januari 2021

Prihadi Dwi Nurcahyanto, M.Pd

Catatan

Wajib diisi dengan hasil ketikan bukan tulisan tangan

*Mohon menunjukkan hasil prosentase sebelum meminta tanda tangan