the evolution of humans over the last 2 million years ......excoffier l, and langaney a (1989)...

24
1 The Evolution of Humans Over The Last 2 Million Years: Genes, Fossils, & Archaeology All fossils found in Africa Found in Africa, Europe and Asia

Upload: others

Post on 24-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    The Evolution of HumansOver The Last 2 Million

    Years:

    Genes, Fossils, &Archaeology

    All fossilsfound inAfrica

    Found in Africa, Europe and

    Asia

  • 2

    What Do GenesTell Us?

    Genes As “Fossils”

    Haplotype Tree

  • 3

    A Haplotype Tree Should NeverBe Equated To A Tree of

    Human Populations. It Is OnlyThe Tree of The Genetic

    Variation For That DNA Region.There Is Information AboutPopulation History in the

    Haplotype Tree, But It Must BeExtracted Carefully.

    InferringEvolutionaryHistory From

    HaplotypeTrees

    Nested CladePhylogeographic

    Analysis

  • 4

    Nested Clade Analysis

    • Converts Haplotype Trees Into A NestedStatistical Design

    • Other Data (Phenotypic or Geographical)Are Then Overlaid Upon The NestedDesign

    • Statistical Tests Are Performed To DetectSignificant Associations Between theData and The Haplotype Tree

    Only When Statistical SignificanceIs Achieved Is The BiologicalSignificance Interpreted With

    Explicit, a priori Criteria•For Example, Under Isolation By Distance, ItTakes Many Generations For A New Haplotype ToSpread Across Many Populations.•Therefore, Expect Older Haplotypes To Be MoreWidespread Than Younger Haplotypes•Younger Haplotypes Tend To Have GeographicalRanges Nested Within the Ranges of TheirAncestral Haplotypes

  • 5

    Significant Gene Flow WithIsolation By Distance in aHuman mtDNA Haplotype

    Tree

    26

    112

    13

    15

    2325

    4041

    42

    45

    46

    505662

    7266

    73

    7549

    1-11-2

    1-3

    1-41-5

    1-7

    1-17

    1-18

    2-12-2 2-4 2-3

    {

    {

    {2-52-6

    2-7

    3-1 3-2

    {

    EuropeAfrica

    Asia

    Excoffier L, and Langaney A (1989) Origin and differentiation ofhuman mitochondrial DNA. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 44:73-85.

  • 6

    Nested CladePhylogeographic Analysis

    • Recurrent Gene Flow, Range Expansion andFragmentation Could All Have Occurred atDifferent Times and/or Places.

    • NCPA Therefore Looks For Multiple Patterns, NotJust One

    • The Relative Temporal Ordering of Events in aNested Series of Clades Is Also Inferred by NCPA

    • The Validity of NCPA Inferences Was TestedWith Actual Data Sets With 150 a prioriExpectations And Did Very Well. The MostCommon Error Was Failure to Detect An Event,And False Inferences Were Rare

    Inference Errors in Nested Clade Analysis

    All of these errors can be minimized by studying multiple lociand requiring each inference (type, place and time) to becorroborated by two or more loci.

    • Requires Adequate Sampling To ObtainStatistical Significance. NCPA can also haveambiguous biological inference due toinadequate geographical sampling.

    • Inference Requires That An Appropriate MutationOccurred At the Right Time and Right Place:Therefore, Some Events and Processes AreMissed With A Particular DNA Region.

    • Selection and Evolutionary Stochasticity CanDistort The Distribution of Haplotypes in Spaceand Time, Therefore Leading to False Inferences.

  • 7

    Performed Nested Clade Analyses on25 DNA Regions

    • Mitochondrial DNA (Ingman et al. Nature 408, 708 - 713, 2000: Sykeset al. American Journal of Human Genetics 57, 1463-1475, 1995; Torroni et al. American Journalof Human Genetics 53, 563-590, 1993, American Journal of Human Genetics 53, 591-608, 1993).

    • Y-DNA (Hammer et al. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15, 427-441, 1998)• 11 X-Linked Regions (Balciuniene et al. 2001; Garrigan et al. 2005;

    Hammer et al. 2004; Harris. & Hey, 1999, 2001; Kaessmann et al. 1999; Nachman et al. 2004;Saunders et al. 2002; Verrelli et al. 2002; Yu et al. 2002)

    • 12 Autosomal Genes (Bamshad et al. 2002, Harding et al. 1997; Holloxet al. 2001; Jin et al. 1999; Koda et al. 2001; Rana et al. 1999; Rogers et al. 2000; Toomajian andKreitman 2002; Wooding et al. 2002; Zhang & Rosenberg 2000).

    Expected Coalescence Times

    4NefAutosomal DNA

    3NefX-Linked DNA

    NefY-ChromosomalDNA

    NefMitochondrial DNA

  • 8

    Mean and Variance ofCoalescence Time

    For an Autosomal Locus:Mean = 4Nef

    Variance = 4.64(Nef)2

    Estimated Times To Common Ancestor(Method of Takahata et al. 2001)

    Dh Nuc.Diff.Within Humans

    Dhc Nuc.Diff.Between Humans

    & Chimps

    6 Million Years Ago

    TMRCA = 12Dh/Dhc

  • 9

    Estimated Times To The CommonAncestor (Method of Takahata et al. 2001)

    * Older than the Human/Chimp Split That is Set to 6.0 MYA.

    *

    Cross-Validation of Inferences

    • Concordance of Inference Type andGeographical Location AreStraightforward

    • E.g., the 25 DNA regions collectively yield15 inferences of Range Expansion(concordance of inference type) going outof Africa to Eurasia (concordance ofgeographical location)

    • Cross-Validation Also RequiresConcordance in Time

  • 10

    Estimate Time of Event orProcess By Age of Youngest

    Haplotype or Clade thatContributes to Inference In a

    Statistically SignificantFashion

    Estimate the distribution of the age ofthe haplotype or clade as a GammaDistribution with mean T (the age

    estimate of Takahata et al. 2001) andVariance T2/(1+k)

    where k is the average pairwisedivergence among present day

    haplotypes derived from the haplotypebeing aged, measured as the number

    of nucleotide differences

  • 11

    Gamma Distributions For Out-of-Africa Inferences

    !

    G = "2 (1+ ki) 1"ti

    ˆ T + ln ti " ln

    ˆ T # $ %

    & ' (

    i=1

    j

    )

    A Likelihood Ratio Test of TheHypothesis That The Estimated Timesof An Event From j Loci Are The Same

    !

    ˆ T =

    ti(1+ ki )

    i=1

    j

    "

    (1+ ki )

    i=1

    j

    "

  • 12

    The log likelihood ratio test rejects the null hypothesis that all 15 eventsare temporally concordant with a probability value of 3.89 × 10-15.

    P = 0.95

    P = 0.51

    P = 0.62

    Three Out-of-Africa Events, All DefinedBy Three or More Loci With A High

    Degree of Temporal HomogeneityBut With Highly Significant

    Heterogeneity BetweenThe Three Events

    There Were At Least Three Out-of-Africa Expansion Events Over

    the Last 2 Million Years

    0.9937-3.09691.9007

    0.3917-0.97450.6508

    0.0965-0.16930.1304

    95% Confidence RangeTime of Expansion

    (Millions of Years Ago)

  • 13

    Gamma Distributions ForAfrican/Eurasian Gene Flow Inferences

    With Isolation By DistanceExtensive overlap implies cross-validationwith the exception of MX1, the only locuswith most of its probability mass in the Pliocene.

    The lack of clusters implies therewas no prolonged breaks in geneflow throughout the Pleistocene

    Temporal Congruence in Means Is NotNecessary for Recurrent Processes

    Such as Gene Flow, But Can CombineSeveral Loci Together To DetermineThe Probability of Gene Flow By A

    Given T in the Past.

    !

    Pr(gene flow by T ) =1"tikie"ti (1+ ki ) / Ti

    Ti

    1 + ki

    #

    $ %

    &

    ' (

    1 + ki

    )(1 + ki )0

    T

    *i=1

    j

    + dti

  • 14

    African/Eurasian Gene Flow Has ExistedFor At Least 1.46 MY with 95%

    Confidence (excluding MX1)

    Can All of TheseInferences Be IntegratedInto A Single Overview ofRecent Human Evolution?

  • 15

    Homo erectus ExpandsOut of Africa at 1.9 MYA,as Shown By Fossil Data

    And Molecular Data

    A Multi-LocusReconstruction

    of HumanEvolution Over

    the Past 2Million Years

    Allfossils

    found inAfrica

    Found in Africa, Europe and

    Asia

    Homo erectus ExpandsOut of Africa at 1.9 MYA,as Shown By Fossil Data

    And Molecular Data

    By Using ModernHumans, Chimpsand Gorillas as

    Models, AQuantitative

    Genetic OverlayUpon FacialMorphologyRevealed A

    Relaxation ofSelection At This

    Time, Indicating ASignificantIncrease in

    Reliance UponCulture & Tools(Ackermann &

    Cheverud, PNAS101: 17946, 2004)

  • 16

    Homo erectus ExpandsOut of Africa at 1.9 MYA,as Shown By Fossil Data

    And Molecular Data

    Agusti J, Kiladze G,Mouskhelishvili A, Nioradze M,de Leon MSP, Tappen M, andZollikofer CPE (2005)Anthropology: The earliesttoothless hominin skull. Nature434:717.

    Homo erectus ExpandsOut of Africa at 1.9 MYA,as Shown By Fossil Data

    And Molecular Data

    As A Consequence,The Human FaceProbably Evolved

    As A MostlyNeutral Trait

    Associated WithSelection for

    Increased CranialCapacity And CanBe Predicted WellUsing The GrowthModels Of Modern

    Chimps and Gorillas

  • 17

    Homo erectus ExpandsOut of Africa at 1.9 MYA,as Shown By Fossil Data

    And Molecular Data

    Was this initial colonization of Eurasia by Homo erectus permanent or didthey go extinct (Dennel, J. Human Evol. 45: 421-440, 2003)?

    With NCPA, The Only Events Detectable Are Those Involving PopulationsThat Left Genetic Descendants In the Current Populations Sampled.

    The 1.9 MYA Expansion Event WasDetected By 3 loci, and There is aContinuous Record of Gene FlowInvolving Eurasian Populations

    Throughout the Pleistocene.

    Therefore, the initialcolonization of Eurasia by

    Homo erectus was a permanentone for the human lineage

    A Multi-LocusReconstruction

    of HumanEvolution Over

    the Past 2Million Years

    1.9 MYA

    Gene Flow Between Africanand Eurasian Populations

    With Isolation By Distance by1.46 MYA With 95%

    Confidence

  • 18

    1.9 MYA

    Second Expansion Out ofAfrica 0.65 MYA, as Shown By

    Genetic Data, the AcheuleanExpansion and an Increase in

    Cranial Capacity

    1.9 MYA

    A Major Archaeological Question IsWhether The Acheulean ExpansionWas The Spread of a Culture or The

    Spread Of Populations With TheCulture?

    The Detection of A Major PopulationRange Expansion Out of Africa At

    This Time Indicates It Was TheSpread of Acheulean Populations

  • 19

    1.9 MYA

    Did These Acheulean PopulationsReplace (Drive to Extinction) TheNon-Acheulean Populations That

    They Encountered in Eurasia?Since NCPA Can Only Detect Events

    In Populations That Left Descendants,If Replacement Occurred, There

    Should be No Eurasian InferencesOlder Than the Acheulean Expansion.

    Any Event Older ThanThis Exceeds The 1%

    Older Tail of The PooledAcheulean Gamma

    Distribution.This Includes the 1.9 MYAHomo erectus Expansion

  • 20

    Any Event Older ThanThis Exceeds The 1%

    Older Tail of The PooledAcheulean Gamma

    Distribution.This Includes Two Gene

    Flow Events (MX1Excluded)

    The log-likelihood Ratio Test Rejects The Hypothesis ofTotal Acheulean Replacement With p =0.0346

    A Multi-LocusReconstruction

    of HumanEvolution Over

    the Past 2Million Years

    1.9 MYA

    0.65 MYA

    Gene Flow Between Africanand Eurasian PopulationsWith Isolation By DistanceWith 99.99% Confidence

  • 21

    Third Out of Africa Expansion0.096 to 0.169 MYA; Spread of

    “Modern” Traits Out ofAfrica, But Many “Modern”Traits Are Still Polymorphic

    and There is TemporalContinuity Of Other Traits

    1.9 MYA

    0.65 MYA

    A Multi-LocusReconstruction

    of HumanEvolution Over

    the Past 2Million Years

    The 1%Tail Of The Third Out-of-Africa ExpansionEvent is At 0.1774 MYA. The Log-Likehood Ratio Test

    Of The Hypothesis That There Were No EarlierEurasian Events Yields a p-value < 10-17

    Therefore, This ExpansionWas Also CharacterizedBy Interbreeding, Not

    Replacement.Interbreeding AlsoExplains The Fossil

    Pattern of A MixtureOf Spreading Traits

    And RegionallyContinuous Traits

  • 22

    0.3

    0.2

    1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

    Geographic Distance in Miles

    0.0

    0.1

    fst(x)

    A Multi-LocusReconstruction

    of HumanEvolution Over

    the Past 2Million Years

    Gene Flow With Isolation ByDistance Continues, But Now

    With Some Long DistanceDispersal. Expansions OccurOut of Asia Back to Europe &Africa (Male Mediated) andInto Northern Eurasia, thePacific, and the Americas

    0.13 MYA

    1.9 MYA

    0.65 MYA

  • 23

    All of The InferencesValidated By Two Or MoreGenes Define a Coherent

    Overview of RecentHuman Evolution That Is

    Consistent With TheFossil & Archaeological

    Record.

    Two DominantThemes

    • Out-of-Africa Expansions.Populations of African origin dominaterecent human evolution, although not

    exclusively.

    • Genetic Interchange.Recurrent gene flow with isolation by

    distance dominates human history,with occasional range expansions

    resulting in interbreeding, notreplacement.

  • 24

    Implications

    • All living humans are from a singleevolutionary lineage that has evolved asa cohesive unit for at least the past1,460,000 years because of gene flow.

    • There are no biological races in humans.• Current human populations show genetic

    differences, but these are smallcompared to other species of large-bodied mammals and primarily reflectgeographical distance.