The Developmental Management Approach to Behaviour at Meadows PS

Helen Hatzikalis and Mary Cox

OUR JOURNEY SO FAR…

• School profile and background• The Beginning• The Merge• Where we’re at now• Moving forward…..…The future• Personal Journeys

SCHOOL PROFILE ANDBACKGROUND

SCHOOL PROFILE

• Approximately 300 students• Culturally diverse and socio-economic

disadvantaged population• The Student Family Occupation (SFO) density of

the student population is 0.86. • Indicators show that our students usually achieve

at or below the expected level in literacy and numeracy

• The Regeneration Project will result in a purpose-built school organised around learning units with students grouped according to the VELS Levels.

COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS

• Our school has developed strong partnerships to optimise the development, learning opportunities, health and wellbeing of children and their families.

• Vic Health • Melbourne City Mission • Broadmeadows Uniting Care • Dianella Community Health Services• Anglicare Victoria • Vicseg • Hume City Council • Playgroup Victoria

BEFORE DEVELOPMENTAL MANAGEMENT APPROACH

PRE 2009

IN THE BEGINNING – BEFORE DMA

• 2 campuses Meadowbank PS & Campmeadows PS

• 2 Student Welfare and Discipline Policy Procedures

• Varied school rules and expectations-• Classroom rules- each classroom set

their own rules at beginning of year• School values/classroom values

through the Quality Approach

WHAT THE DATA SHOWED

• Surveys (parent, teacher, student) showed that behaviour management was an issue, particularly outside the classroom on both campuses

• Anecdotal records showed that incidences in the yard were increasing and that to a lesser extent the classroom.

• Serious cases dealt with by senior leadership• Classroom teachers dealt with

misdemeanours – consequences and detentions.

STUDENT WELFARE TEACHER

• As a result of increasing behaviour management issues, Meadowbank campus appointed a full time welfare teacher

• Campmeadows campus had welfare teacher 1 day a week

• Dealt with issues such as absenteeism, sorting out issues amongst students, contacting parents

THE NEED FOR ALIGNMENT

• Ramon Lewis PD’s provided an opportunity for both schools to develop a Behaviour Management Approach as a whole school.

• To improve student learning outcomes we had to look at Behaviour Management in the classroom.

• Staff had to have clear, consistent and aligned views about behaviour management.

• Disengaged students identified.• Consensus by teachers to focus on rights and • responsibilities as per DMA.• Ramon’s visit/ recommendations

IMPLEMENTATION OF DMA• Staff PD:• Types & identification of

students- A, B, C, D and their different needs

• Types of teacher approaches

• Rights based philosophy – Learn/ Safe

• Personal & Communal Responsibilities

• Develop, build and negotiate relationships – difficult students

• Hinting non verbal gestures

• Using the language of all of the above

THE MERGE TERM 3 2009

The Merge – The Beginning Of A Combined Approach

• Beginning- Values, Vision - Quality Approach• Developing relationships • Conveying to students 2 rights and their behaviours• The right to learn• The right to feel safe

RESOURCES

• Dedicated staff • Welfare room set

aside

EXIT NOTE

• Implementation of ‘exit’ notes given after-

• 4 step process• Explanation• Warning• Removal from group &

re entry by student• Exit from room to

Welfare Room

COMMITMENT TO CHANGE & RE-ENTRY FORMS

TEACHER RESOURCES

• Booklets using the language of Ramon Lewis

• Competition• Posters • Yard duty form for

incidences• Dialogue cards• GAME

USING DMA LANGUAGE

POSTERS

• DISPLAYS OF POSTERS IN LEARNING UNITS

• AROUND SCHOOL

STUDENTS UNDERSTANDINGS

• Competition by students to design symbols

• Students present at assembly:

a focus of Safety and Learning by a different Learning Unit

VISUAL DISPLAYS

COMMUNITY UNDERSTANDINGS

• Documentation developed to inform parents-

• Positive letter home

• Letter to advise of behaviour management

WHERE WE’RE AT NOW….

What the data shows…. And responding to data• What were the specific commonalities, patterns of

behaviour ?• Who were the students? • Identification of C’s & D’s.• Can we be more proactive?

• Commonalities identified…. Students exited from classrooms distracting others etc…• Outside play behaviour needs to be addressed.

EXITS

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

EXITS Yard Class Art PE Library Science

Series1

STUDENT REPORTED INCIDENTS

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

student reported incidents

Namecalling/teasing

exclusion

hit,kicked,punched,pushed

rumours/lies

things taken from me

my things damaged

scared in the yard

VISITS TO WELFARE ROOM

Highest number of exits

MOVING FORWARD….

STAFF EVALUATION

Where to from here……..

• Moving forward…..…The future• Change classroom practises to affect student

outcomes: Tailored programs for student

engagement C-D students 1 HOUR IN -1 HOUR OUT

Individual learning plans and student support groups

• Classroom environment • Continued staff Professional Learning• Socialisation programs - student welfare teacher

More Recommendations

• Mentoring new teachers, CRT’s, specialists• Build and develop relationships and

continue to develop the Ramon Lewis language, signs, dialogue cards

Professional relationshipsStudent relationshipsFamily relationships

• Continue Mentor program – Kids Hope, Breakfast Program, Learning Club

Other recommendations

• Special Play Days to develop socialisation programs

group gamesco-operative gamesbuild resilience

• Develop oral language – non competitive games- chants, rhymes, skipping.

• Cross age tutoring• Peer mediation – student responsibility

CHALLENGES

• Common understandings & common culture between 2 schools

• Teachers getting out of their comfort zones

• Shift in attitudes clinging to own beliefs

My Personal JourneyWhat’s Happening That’s

Great!

• Introduced rights and responsibilities• C student manageable – started with

a contract• Student voice – negotiation of

solutions• Whole school assembly focus

Personal goals

Contract

Community Tree

• Poems of “Change”

• Values each individual bring to learning unit

ASSEMBLY PRESENTATIONS