the bay area future of jobs · • service-sector jobs have grown both knowledge-sector jobs as...
TRANSCRIPT
The Bay Area Future of JobsHorizon Perspective Paper #4
May 20, 2019, San Mateo Public LibraryAksel Olsen, Senior PlannerCynthia Kroll, Chief Economist / Assistant DirectorABAG / MTC
Perspective Papers Overview
2Overview
1) Autonomous Vehicles 2) Toward a Shared Future 3) Growth Strategies
4) The Future of Jobs 5) Bay Crossings 6) Sea Level Rise
Priority strategies from Horizon will be considered for inclusion in Plan Bay Area 2050 – starting in
September 2019.
MotivationRegional Agencies ABAG and MTC
• Charged with 20+ year land use / transportation investment plans
• Last plan (2017) projected • Hollowing out of middle income
households over by 2040• Housing crisis could be seen as
income crisis• Plan Short Term “Action Plan”
• Housing (CASA)• Economic Development (CEDS)
• Question: did we think about the robots?
3
Perspective Paper 4: The Future of JobsPurpose
Review key trends affecting the regional labor market and job prospects of Bay Area residents
How will these trends affect the region and its diverse communities?
Identify priority strategies on the state, regional, and local levels to address planning challenges associated with a changing regional economy
Continue the conversation related to the emerging economic development role of the regional agencies in preparation for Plan Bay Area 2050
4Overview
Background: Economic Foundations
5
https://st.llnl.gov/?page=1
Productivity Grows at Faster Rate than Jobs
0
50
100
150
200
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Jobs and Economic Output Trends – Bay Area (compared to 2001 base year)
Jobs
Economic Output
6Overview
Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2001 to 2017
Knowledge-Sector Jobs Continue to Grow, Particularly in the Tech Sector…
7Overview
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Technology Job Trends – by County
San Francisco
San Mateo
Santa Clara
Remaining Counties
Alameda
Source: QCEW, 1990 to 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Share of Jobs by Occupation – Bay Area
Management & Professional
Service
Sales & Office
Construction & Extraction
Production & Transportation
Source: PUMS, 1960 to 2016
… While Industrial and Manufacturing Jobs Continue to Decline.
• Jobs requiring physical labor have
declined in recent years, including
industrial and construction jobs.
• Service-sector jobs have grown both
knowledge-sector jobs as well as
personal and food services.
• Missing middle hollowing out in action?
8Overview
Select Occup. Changes in Bay Area Jobs: 2000 to 2017
+88,000
+47,000
+42,000
+27,000
+24,000
-16,000
-16,000
-45,000
-51,000
Food preparation & serving
Business & financial operations
Healthcare practitioners and technicians
Arts, design, sports entertainment & media
Personal care & service
Construction & extraction
Transportation & material moving
Office & administrative support
Production
Source: BLS OES
Bay Area Future of Jobs: Four “Lenses” of Change
TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION
COMPENSATIONLOCATION
9Overview
• Decline of “standard” jobs• Emergence of the “gig
economy”• Changing employment
conditions
• Automation and digitization of tasks
• Complex division of labor
• Shared workspaces• Virtual workspaces• Benefits and drawbacks of
concentration
• Bifurcating wage structure• Variable & unpredictable
income streams
Jobs Are Changing in Several Ways…
TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION
COMPENSATIONLOCATION
10
• Decline of “standard” jobs• Emergence of the “gig
economy”• Changing employment
conditions
• Automation and digitization of tasks
• Complex division of labor
• Shared workspaces• Virtual workspaces• Benefits and drawbacks of
concentration
• Bifurcating wage structure• Variable & unpredictable
income streams
“For [the Bay Area], I see nothing but continued future
growth pressures. And they will be exacerbated because
it’s the lower level “routinized” jobs that can be most
easily automated and replaced by AI in the future.”
- Managing Director, Strategy + Innovation, real estate
service firm
11Next Steps
Automation Creates Both Opportunities and Risks
• Vexing for regional economists and
planners
• Grows the economy in the
aggregate, while issuing pink slips
• Balancing act: Speed matters
• Fate of regions tied to the success
of their economies
12
TECHNOLOGY
http://digital.library.louisville.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/cs/id/1347/rec/10
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Model_S#/media/File:Tesla_auto_bots_(cropped).jpg
New wave(s) of automation
• Big data, distributed computing power and
deep learning neural networks: pattern
recognition at scale
o Classifying legal documents, finding flaws in
contracts, analyzing health records, scoring
credit risks
• Complement or competition? Likely both.
• Challenge: Embrace digital innovation,
automation but support labor markets,
communities
13
TECHNOLOGY
https://www.cmcmachinery.com/portfolio-item/ecommerce1-cmc-cartonwrap/; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Dynamics#/media/File:Atlas_from_boston_dynamics.jpg; https://www.computerworld.com/article/3318118/ibm-to-move-watson-health-to-a-hybrid-cloud.html ;
Scale Question: What kind of automation will AI be?
14
TECHNOLOGY
http://www.assiniboine.com/property-maintenance/fall-yard-clean-up/
https://idtxs3.imgix.net/si/30000/F4/FA.jpg?w=1024&h=450fit=fill&bg=ffffff&border=0
Alameda 288,000 135,300 235,300
Contra Costa 178,600 95,400 166,000
Marin 50,400 21,600 35,000
Napa 20,300 10,600 24,900
San Francisco 188,900 83,300 131,200
San Mateo 146,900 68,600 110,900
Santa Clara 378,900 148,800 256,900
Solano 57,900 35,300 74,000
Sonoma 75,200 41,100 89,900
<30 pct 30-70 pctAutomation Score
>70 pct
Bay Area Automation "Risk", by County
80,000
160,000
240,000
320,000
• Strategic development functions and skills highly concentrated here-likely to continue, even increase
• North Bay Counties: more workers in high risk category,
• South Bay, West Bay: Lower, middle
Which areas are most at risk?
Source: Automation Data From Frey & Osborne 2017; Demographic Data From US Census ACS PUMS 2015-2017
<30 pct >70 pct30-70 pctAutomation Score
Less than high school
High school or equiv
Some college
Associate's degree
Bachelor's degree
Postgraduate degree
43,200 93,500 171,300
110,400 130,200 265,500
200,900 134,900 303,200
89,600 42,800 89,300
502,900 125,800 229,200
438,300 112,900 65,800 80,000
160,000
240,000
320,000
400,000
480,000
Bay Area Automation "Risk" by Education
Source: Automation Data From Frey & Osborne 2017; Demographic Data From US Census ACS PUMS 2015-2017
Education and risk
• Education reduces risk
• For many education groups, workers in low or high risk groups, less in middle
Jobs Are Changing in Several Ways…
TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION
COMPENSATIONLOCATION
17
• Decline of “standard” jobs• Emergence of the “gig
economy”• Changing employment
conditions
• Automation and digitization of tasks
• Complex division of labor
• Shared workspaces• Virtual workspaces• Benefits and drawbacks of
concentration
• Bifurcating wage structure• Variable & unpredictable
income streams
“This whole idea of an “API economy” is a big deal. …
Companies can now seamlessly outsource many pieces of their
business. They can get access to programmers through the gig
economy roles. There's no doubt that this will continue to
play out in the world of big companies as well.“
- Managing director, executive search firm
18Next Steps
• More fluid labor markets (agency temp, contract, short term)
• Independent work opportunities are expanding, accelerated by new technologies, organizational changes
• Advantages include:o More choices on how to worko Flexibility on when to worko Cash on the side
• At the same time, there are challenges:
o Less obvious career ladder jobso Income instabilityo No guaranteed benefits (e.g., medical)o No pensions/retirement benefits
ORGANIZATION
Alternative WorkArrangements
Bay Area: Nontraditional Employment Outpaced Wage + Salary Employment
20
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
Remaining Industries
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Other Services (except Public Administration)
Transportation and Warehousing
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Health Care and Social Assistance
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and RemediationServices
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
Wage & Salary Jobs and Nonemployer Establishments (2001: Index 100)
Nonemployers Wage & Salary Workers
Ride Sharing More Common in Bay Area than CA, US
21
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Share of Sole Proprietors, CountTaxi and Limousine Service
Bay Area California US
Source: US Census, Nonemployer Statistics
ORGANIZATION
$-
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Receipts per WorkerTaxi and Limousine Service
Bay Area California US
For Types of Independent Workers
• Just under half of independent
workers have it as primary
source of income
• “Casual earners” are the
largest demographic,
accounting for 4 in 10 workers
(US data)
ORGANIZATION
Source: US data, Manyika et al. (2016)
Primary
By choice
Out ofnecessity
Supplemental
FREEAGENTS22 million 32%
RELUCTANTS10 million 14%
FINANCIALLYSTRAPPED
9 million 14%
CASUALEARNERS
27 million 40%
46% 54%
28%
72%
22
Jobs Are Changing in Several Ways…
TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION
COMPENSATIONLOCATION
23
• Decline of “standard” jobs• Emergence of the “gig
economy”• Changing employment
conditions
• Automation and digitization of tasks
• Complex division of labor
• Shared workspaces• Virtual workspaces• Benefits and drawbacks of
concentration
• Bifurcating wage structure• Variable & unpredictable
income streams
“One contributor to wealth inequality is being driven by digital
transformation – as the Superstars become bigger Superstars; and
some Superstars become Supernovas. ”
- Managing Director, Strategy + Innovation, real estate service firm
24Next Steps
Incomes are Growing – but Not for Everyone
COMPENSATION
• Wages are bifurcating, with growing
incomes for the wealthy while lower-
income households’ earnings remain
relatively stagnant.
• Returns to skill: Technology has favored
grads
• Income inequality has been rising
since the 1970s; just over 10 countries
are more unequal than the Bay Area. $-
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Household Income Trends – Bay Area (in today’s dollars)
20th
Percentile
50th
Percentile
80th
Percentile
90th
Percentile
10th
Percentile
Source: iPUMS, 1960 to 2016
25
Part of story is education
COMPENSATION
Bay Area 2017 Wages (>32 hours/week) by Educational AttainmentBay Area: 25th Percentile to 75th Percentile
Source: Us Census Bureau, ACS PUMS (1-year), 2017
26
• Education is the typical road to higher wages—but it may not be enough – more agile training and funding needed.
• Occupational shifts also loom large with rise in low pay service sector work
• Securing livelihoods may require intervention—particularly as low skill work may be less valuable in the future
Jobs Are Changing in Several Ways…
TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATION
COMPENSATIONLOCATION
27
• Decline of “standard” jobs• Emergence of the “gig
economy”• Changing employment
conditions
• Automation and digitization of tasks
• Complex division of labor
• Shared and virtual workspaces
• Industry sorting• Benefits and drawbacks of
concentration
• Bifurcating wage structure• Variable & unpredictable
income streams
“The city is a living laboratory which I think is critical to the
operations of a lot of small to midsize tech firms; whether it's a
delivery service or something fashion based … they thrive off the
energy of the city and it [offers] the ability to implement beta
versions of whatever it is they're doing within mere blocks of
where they operate.”
- Industry Lead, Architectural Services Firm
28Next StepsImage Credit: Nic Lehoux
A Changing Regional Landscape?
LOCATION
• Urban Space or Cyberspace: Paradoxically, automation enhances growth in city centers as face-to-face interactions remain valuable.
• Decline of manufacturing: Transition to more dense, amenity rich employment centers: SF, South Bay hold more workers in the same buildings: new modes / spaces of working.• Many suburban office parks repurposed,
made more amenity rich. More like cities
• Long term impacts to transportation, housing
• Lower barriers to entry: Flexible work sites concentrate in existing job centers.
29
Office in-fill, BIG’s proposed Google offices in Sunnyvale
https://www.dezeen.com/2018/01/04/big-google-caribbean-terraced-office-buildings-sunnyvale-california/
Changing Geographies of Work
30
Source: Census 1982 of Retail; LEHD LODES
LOCATION
• Different industries “prefer” different types of locations, amenities, workers
• New technologies could allow for greater decentralization via telecommuting –e.g., virtual reality. So far, information sector most prone to centralization.
• Retail has lost jobs in the middle band but gained in the core. Can it continue to be a career ladder in the periphery?
Priority strategies will be considered in the context of three “what if…” scenarios developed for use in Horizon.
Priority strategies are intended to be long-range planning concepts to move the Bay Area in a more sustainable direction.
Priority strategies are not intended to be specific short-term legislative proposals or calls-to-action.
31Overview https://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/media/apprenticeship_opportunities.jpg
32
Overview of Potential Priority Strategies
Technology Organization Compensation Location
Priority Production Areas
State Training Fund for Displaced Workers
Lifelong Learning and Training Accounts
Portable Benefits
Increased Childcare Support for Families
Wage Insurance
Universal Basic Income
Incubator Programs in Distressed Areas
Means-Based Transit
Development Limits in Job-Rich Cities
Employment Incentives in Transit-Rich Areas
What’s Next for The Future of Jobs Paper?
Outreach to Stakeholders
Perspective Paper
Release
Strategy Testing via
Futures
Draft Preferred
Plan
33Next Steps
January-April 2019
May 2019Fall 2019 &Winter 2020Spring 2019
Moderator and Panelists:
• Cynthia Kroll (Moderator): Chief Economist & Assist. Planning Director, MTC/ABAG
• Stephen Baiter, Executive Director, East Bay Economic Development Alliance
• Laurel Arvanitidis, Dir. of Business Development, City and County of San Francisco
• Ofelia Bello, Executive Director, Youth United for Community Action
• Randy Howder, Managing Director, Gensler San Francisco
Panel Discussion
34Overview
Potential Priority Strategies
35OverviewImage Credit: Tabea Damm, https://unsplash.com/photos/9-xfYKAI6ZI
Priority Production Areas (PPAs) to Protect Key Industrial Lands
36
Strategy
DIVERSE VIBRANT
TECHNOLOGY
T1
Benefits
Primary Guiding
Principles
Identify critical areas to the regional industrial land base and establish a program to protect such areas, thus helping to stabilize land markets.
Supports local supply chains for regional economic clusters; supports local jobs and training.
Examples• San Francisco: PDR Zoning • San Jose: Framework for
Preservation of Employment Lands
HPA Architecture, https://www.northbaybusinessjournal.com/northbay/solanocounty/8829673-181/solano-fairfield-industrial-real-estate-construction
State-Level Training Fund for Workers Displaced by Automation
37
Strategy
DIVERSE VIBRANT
TECHNOLOGY
T2
Benefits
Primary Guiding
Principles
Establish a state-level fund for automation-induced displacement and distribute grants to regional programs working in partnership with county workforce development boards.
Equips displaced workers with skills needed to quickly reenter the workforce.
Examples• Colorado: Skillful Worker Training• Germany: Dual-System Work/School
Apprenticeship Program
By Steve Jurvetson - Flickr: Tesla Autobots, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=24819239
38
ORGANIZATION
Lifelong Learning and Training Accounts (LLTAs)
Strategy
VIBRANT
O1
Benefits
Primary Guiding
Principle
Confers rights to training to workers; useful for mid-career training.
Examples• Aspen Institute: $2,000 pretax with
matching funds for training• Singapore: $500 training credit
Establish LLTAs to address the decline of traditional single-employer jobs, resulting in a better trained workforce with greater flexibility to change careers.
Mirko Tobias Schäfer https://www.flickr.com/photos/gastev/9319066661/
39
ORGANIZATION
Portable Benefits
Strategy
VIBRANT
O2
Benefits
Primary Guiding
Principle
Decouple benefits from employment and address the rise of part-time employment by advancing a portable benefits system and creating a safety net for workers in alternative arrangements.
Ties employment benefits to the individual, instead of the employer.
Examples• Freelancers Union• New York: Black Car Fund
https://www.flickr.com/photos/statefarm/9734368418/in/photostream/
40
COMPENSATION
Increased Child Care Support for Low-Income Families
Strategy
C1
Benefits
Primary Guiding
Principles
Increased access to well-placed child care boosts labor force participation and eases drop-off and pickup
Examples
Provide low cost and accessible child care for low income communities to both remove barriers to working for women, while reducing driving to distant child care centers.
DIVERSE VIBRANT
Child Care Center near Multimodal Tamien Station
https://umanitoba.ca/faculties/education/media/2018-11-02-BEd-banner-image.jpg
https://www.facebook.com/BHTamien/photos/rpp.207530306067888/938566169630961/?type=3&theater
41
AFFORDABLE DIVERSE
COMPENSATION
Wage Insurance
Strategy
C2
Benefits
Primary Guiding
Principles
Ties earnings replacement to gains in experience; stabilizes households during transition.
Examples• United States: Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance Program• Canada: Earnings Supplement Project
Consider developing a wage insurance program to reduce the wages lost experienced by most re-employed displaced workers, while encouraging continued participation in the workforce.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ca/39/ce/ca39ce70d7f769f80235c1191d291dd7.jpg
42
COMPENSATION
Universal Basic Income
Strategy
C3
Benefits
Primary Guiding
Principles
Breaks negative feedback loops associated with poverty; makes communities more resilient.
Examples• Y-Combinator Research: UBI Pilot• Stockton: UBI Pilot• Finland: Universal Basic Income
Provide households with guaranteed, unconditional cash transfers, commonly referred to as a “universal basic income”, should jobs be disrupted at a scale well beyond individual control.
DIVERSE VIBRANT
43
LOCATION
Incubator Programs in Economically-Distressed Communities
Strategy
L1
Benefits
Primary Guiding
Principles
Encourages entrepreneurship beyond tech; spurs better business plans from participants.
Examples• San Francisco: La Cocina• The Bronx: Business Bridge Incubator• Philadelphia: iHub
Create incubator programs in economically distressed areas to create business and employment opportunities for low- and moderate-income individuals.
DIVERSE VIBRANThttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/20130307-OC-RBN-4104_%288577514545%29.jpg
44
LOCATION
Means-Based Transit Pricing
Strategy
L2
Benefits
Primary Guiding
Principles
Improves access to jobs for lower-income households.
Examples• Seattle: ORCA LIFT• Portland: Metro Fare Discount
Develop regional means-based pricing for public transit to help low-income workers overcome travel barriers to access economic opportunities in the region and provide for their families.
AFFORDABLE CONNECTEDhttps://www.clippercard.com/ClipperWeb/images/new_design/toolbox/Photos/HR/customers_tagging_card_hr/003_hr.jpg
45
LOCATION
Balancing the Jobs Side of the Jobs/Housing Imbalance
Strategy
L3
Benefits
Primary Guiding
Principle
Disincentivizes excessive job concentrations; provides funding for needed mitigations.
Examples• San Francisco: Proposition M (1986)• San Francisco: Transportation
Sustainability Fee (TSF)
Consider annual caps of commercial development or expansion of impact fees, thus internalizing costs to infrastructure and providing a funding stream for improvements.
CONNECTEDImage Credit: Shawn Clover, Flickr
46
LOCATION
Incentivizing Jobs in Transit-Rich Areas
Strategy
L4
Benefits
Primary Guiding
Principles
Increases transit ridership; potentially improves jobs-housing balance.
Examples• Contra Costa Centre TOD• PSRC “Transit-Supportive Densities
and Land Uses” promoting TOD jobs
Prioritize employment densification in PDAs and TPAs, with an emphasis on locations close to transit that currently have very low employment densities.
CONNECTED HEALTHYImage Credit: PCI Developments