the art and craft of persuasion
DESCRIPTION
The Art and Craft of Persuasion. Based upon: Moser, Joyce, and Ann Watters, ed. Creating America: Reading and Writing Arguments, 3 rd Ed. New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 2002. Types of Appeals. Ethos Based upon shared values and beliefs Ex. FDR, Pearl Harbor, and “fair play” Pathos - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Art and Craft of Persuasion
Based upon:Moser, Joyce, and Ann Watters, ed. Creating America: Reading and Writing Arguments, 3rd Ed. New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 2002.
Types of Appeals
Ethos Based upon shared values and beliefs Ex. FDR, Pearl Harbor, and “fair play”
Pathos Manipulates audience emotions Empathy
Logos Logic and reason Induction and Deduction
Inductive Reasoning
Generalize truth from number of observations MLK: “boy,” motel, playground Faults
Inadequate evidence Faulty conclusion “leap of faith”
Deductive Reasoning
Begins with general principle and makes assertion based upon it
Syllogism Enthymeme
Syllogism
Major Premise + Minor Premise = Conclusion Major Premise: All men are mortal Minor Premise: Socrates is a man Conclusion: Socrates is mortal
Enthymeme
Assumes common knowledge Compresses syllogism “Socrates, being a man, is mortal.”
Errors in Logic
Hasty Generalization Conclusion based upon too few example Two senators are millionaires, therefore all
public officials are rich. Biased Sampling
Examples drawn from a pool guaranteed to produce a certain conclusion
Errors in Logic continued
Straw Man False Target Misstates opponents views
False Analogy Suggests that two people/events are identical
rather than similar Attacks the analogy rather than the issue
Errors in Logic continued
Ad Hominem Attacks against individual holding the position
rather than the position itself “If I am young and right, what does age
matter.” –Sophocles Antigone Post hoc ergo propter hoc
“After this, therefore because of this” Correlation equals causation
Errors in Logic continued
False Dilemma Either-or situation Boils down to only two choices
Slippery Slope First step inevitably leads to disaster
Begging the question Assuming something as a given that hasn’t
been proven
Errors in Logic continued
Non Sequitor Placing two things next to each other to imply
connection without providing any logical backing