texas nodal development process committee structure
TRANSCRIPT
Ground Rules of this Meeting This is NOT a position advocacy meeting. It
is a meeting to define committee structure for market redesign!!!
Mutual respect is desired from all Everyone get out paper and pen and note
questions on slides and hold them.
Ground Rules of this Meeting Cont. The presentation will be given and questions
taken in sections: Roles/Responsibilities Committee Structure Work flow/appeals process Refinements for presentation at TAC
Purpose of the Meeting
Develop cohesive process for the Texas Wholesale Market redesign
Define roles for those involved Produce recommendation to be
presented at TAC and ultimately the Board
Roles and Responsibilities
Six major players exist in the process ERCOT Staff Stakeholders PUC Staff/MOD TAC ERCOT Board/Board Oversight Committee PUC
ERCOT Staff
Role Process facilitator and advisor
Duties Meeting Chairmanship? Meeting Organization (agenda, when, where) Provide insight and advice on systems and
processes Protocol language development Seams management (more later) Strawman recommendations
Stakeholders
Role Develop the policies needed to operate the Texas
Nodal market Duties
Strawman Development Approval of designs Industry segment concerns
PUC Staff/MOD
Role Ensure that policies & rules established for the
market comply with regulatory policies & rules Ensure policies & rules do not provide improper
market incentives and are non-discriminatory Expedited conflict resolution
Duties Strawman recommendations Reporting to the Commission
Technical Advisory Committee Role
Approve recommendations of the ShAG and provide decisions on issues of dispute
Duties Voting on strawman documents Submitting approved stawman documents to the Board Reporting to the Board Oversight Committee of progress Deciding on appeals Directing PRS to convert Board approved strawmen into
PRRs
ERCOT Board of Directors
Role Approve strawmen produced by TAC Decide on appeals of TAC decisions
Duties Voting on strawman documents Direct TAC to have documents converted to
Protocols Deciding on appeals Report to the LOC on progress?
Board Oversight Committee Role
Act as “subject matter experts” for the Board Oversee market development process Ensure conformity with ERCOT principles Ensure process is non-discriminatory
Duties Assist in development of subcommittee structure Monitor committee process Review issues of conflict with the Board Communicate Board recommendations to TAC
Public Utility Commission
Role Provide final approval of completed Texas Nodal
Design Final arbiter of any disputes in the process
Duties Approval of Protocols including Texas Nodal
Design Provide Orders or guidance on direction of
decisions Rule on appeals
Basic Committee Structure ERCOT BoardERCOT Board
GenerationAdequacy
GenerationAdequacy
TransmissionRights
TransmissionRights
OperatingGuides
OperatingGuides
MarketMitigation
MarketMitigation
Day AheadMarket
Day AheadMarket
SettlementSettlement
OperationsOperations
DesignImplementation
DesignImplementation
CongestionManagement
CongestionManagement
Note: Committees are shown as placeholders and only developed if needed
Board Oversight CommitteeBoard Oversight Committee
Technical Advisory CommitteeTechnical Advisory Committee
Stakeholder Advisory GroupShAG – Yeah Baby!
Stakeholder Advisory GroupShAG – Yeah Baby!
Protocol RevisionSubcommittee
Protocol RevisionSubcommittee
Stakeholders Advisory Group Governance
Chair: Independent or ERCOT Vice Chair: ERCOT Voting Structure
Similar to PRS Allowances for voting by non-ERCOT members and ERCOT? 7/8? Segments with one vote per company in each segment Simple majority to pass? ANY DECISIONS MADE CAN BE APPEALED TO TAC
Issues Clearinghouse for all Texas Nodal Market Decisions Early issue: Standard Market Design vs. ZEN vs. Other?
ERCOT Personnel Minimum of one representative from
Operations Settlement Seams representative
Congestion Management Subc. Governance
Chair: ERCOT, Stakeholder, Independent? Vice Chair: ERCOT seams representative Voting Structure: Non-binding straw votes recorded for input to
ShAG
Issues Definition of nodal market Selection of basic features
Additional ERCOT Representatives: ERCOT Operations
Primary Protocol Section Responsibility Section 6: Ancillary Services
Operations Subcommittee Governance
Chair: ERCOT, Stakeholder, Independent? Vice Chair: ERCOT seams representative Voting Structure: Non-binding straw votes recorded for input
to ShAG
Issues Ancillary Services modification? Dispatch changes to unit specific Congestion management changes Unit specific scheduling changes? (here or DA group) Market data?
Operations Subcommittee Con’t Additional ERCOT Representatives
Operations Operations’ systems Settlement
Primary Protocol Section Responsibility Section 4: Scheduling Section 5: Dispatch Section 6: Ancillary Services Section 7: Congestion Management Section 12: Market Information System Section 17: Market Data Collection and Use
Settlement Subcommittee Governance
Chair: ERCOT, Stakeholder, Independent? Vice Chair: ERCOT seams representative Voting Structure: Non-binding straw votes recorded for input to
ShAG Issues
Node specific resource settlement Process for Load Area creation (same zones for load or new?) Changes to imbalance calculations (settle all or imbalance?) Charge type changes Formula changes
Additional ERCOT Representatives: Wholesale settlement
Primary Protocol Section Responsibility Section 6: Ancillary Services Section 9: Settlements and Billing
Day Ahead Market Subcommittee Governance
Chair: ERCOT, Stakeholder, Independent? Vice Chair: ERCOT seams representative Voting Structure: Non-binding straw votes recorded for input to
ShAG
Issues DAM design
Bidding structure Scheduling process Congestion management process Transmission rights treatment Credit management Market clearing Notification
Trading Hub development
Day Ahead Market Subcommittee Con’t Additional ERCOT Representatives:
Market Operations’ systems Settlement
Primary Protocol Section Responsibility Section 4: Scheduling Section 7: Congestion Management Section 12: Market Information System Section 16: Registration and Qualification of Market participants Section 17: Market Data Collection and Use
Market Mitigation Subcommittee Governance
Chair: ERCOT, Stakeholder, Independent? Vice Chair: ERCOT seams representative Voting Structure: Non-binding straw votes recorded for
input to ShAG Issues
Method to be used to mitigate potential market power abuse in a nodal market
Additional ERCOT Representatives: Market Settlement
Primary Protocol Section Responsibility Section 7: Congestion Management
Operating Guides Subcommittee
Governance Chair: ERCOT, Stakeholder, Independent? Vice Chair: ERCOT seams representative Voting Structure: Non-binding straw votes recorded for
input to ShAG Issues
Changes needed to the Operating Guides to implement unit specific resource management
Additional ERCOT Representatives: Operations
Primary Protocol Section Responsibility None
Transmission Rights Subcommittee Governance
Chair: ERCOT, Stakeholder, Independent? Vice Chair: ERCOT seams representative Voting Structure: Non-binding straw votes recorded for input to
ShAG Issues
Flowgate vs. point-to-point rights or combination Options vs. obligations Auction process Pre-Assigned rights
Additional ERCOT Representatives: Market TCR Auction Settlement
Primary Protocol Section Responsibility Section 7: Congestion Management
Generation Adequacy Subcommittee Governance
Chair: ERCOT, Stakeholder, Independent? Vice Chair: ERCOT seams representative Voting Structure: Non-binding straw votes recorded for input to
ShAG Issues
Method to be used to ensure capacity in ERCOT Additional ERCOT Representatives:
Market Settlement
Primary Protocol Section Responsibility Section 4: Scheduling Section 6: Ancillary Services
Ground Rules
Everyone agrees to play nice Robert’s Rules of Order will
be applied in committees with voting structures
In committees with no voting structures majority and minority opinions will be elevated with straw votes taken
Others?
Work Flow
ShAGSubcommittees---------------------Develop White
PapersStraw Voting
ShAG---------------------Voting of White
Papers
TAC---------------------
Approvals/Appeals
PRS---------------------
Protocol/Development
TAC---------------------
Approval
Board---------------------
Approval
Board---------------------
Appeals
PUCT---------------------
Appeals
White Paper Framework
Key concepts written clearly with sufficient detail for later formation of: Protocols Operating Guides ISO Procedures RFP scope for necessary modification to
ERCOT central systems Crafted with the design of other papers in
mind
Myths to be Dispelled“We are taking our current system and
throwing it away”Fact:
Many of the current settlement and customer registration systems will be largely untouched. This is primarily a “Package 1” modification
“If we don’t find a way to streamline the process we won’t make it in time”
Fact: The original process required only 2
years and 4 months from the first ISONP meeting through the market being placed on line and included many changes not required in this process (single control area, customer registration, etc.)
Using the rule timeline gives us 2 years and 7 months
Also Important to Note
Protocol changes for market redesign may not require large wording changes
Small changes to Protocol language can have profound affects on required system changes
Process used to implement the Protocol changes could be as important or more important than the Protocol revision process itself
Areas of the Protocols that should require no or minimal change Section 1: Overview Section 3: Open Access to the ERCOT Transmission Grid Section 8: Outage Coordination Section 10: Metering Section 13: Transmission and Distribution Losses Section 14: State of Texas Renewable Energy Credit Trading
Program Section 15: Registration Section 18: Load Profiling Section 19: Texas Standard Electronic Transaction Section 20: Alternative Dispute Resolution Section 21: Process for Protocol Revision Section 22: Attachments
Role of Seams Representative Attend as many meetings as possible Inform groups of work going on in other
groups that may affect them Inform internal groups in ERCOT who may be
affected by changes being recommended
Timeline
A timeline should be developed in the initial meetings of the ShAG to establish milestones and aid in determining progress
It should include: Protocol development RFP development and bid process Implementation Testing Production
Other Considerations
Training for the market should be provided on various nodal market designs and differences operating in the US and elsewhere
The first ShAG assembly should be a two day meeting First day to ratify the ground rules and committee
structures Second day to fill chair positions and establish
marching orders