temporal trends and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy in lombardy, northern italy, 1996–2010
TRANSCRIPT
MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE
Temporal trends and determinants of peripartum hysterectomyin Lombardy, Northern Italy, 1996–2010
Fabio Parazzini • Elena Ricci • Sonia Cipriani •
Francesca Chiaffarino • Renata Bortolus •
Vito Chiantera • Giuseppe Bulfoni
Received: 31 May 2012 / Accepted: 23 August 2012 / Published online: 19 September 2012
� Springer-Verlag 2012
Abstract
Purpose To analyze the temporal trends of peripartum
hysterectomy (PH) in the period 1996–2010 in Lombardy,
Italy.
Methods Using data from the Regional Database, PH
ratios/1,000 deliveries were calculated from 1996 to 2010,
in strata of age and mode of delivery among women resi-
dent in Lombardy, Italy. PH cases were identified search-
ing the database for the ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for
subtotal and total hysterectomy. PH ratios/1,000 deliveries
in strata of age, mode of delivery and calendar year were
computed. Poisson’s regression analysis was used to test
trend over time.
Results A total of 905 PH and 1,289,163 deliveries were
recorded between 1996 and 2010. The overall PH ratio was
0.70/1,000 deliveries. The PH ratio/1,000 deliveries
increased over time, being 0.57 in 1996 and 0.88/1,000
deliveries in 2010 (P \ 0.0001). After including calendar
year, mode of delivery and maternal age in the Poisson’s
regression equation, no significant linear trend emerged in
the PH ratio over time (P = 0.28). Women who underwent
cesarean section (CS) (CS vs. vaginal delivery: OR 5.66,
95 % CI 4.91–6.54) and older women were at increased
risk of PH (maternal age C40 vs. \30 years: OR 5.66,
95 % CI 4.48–7.15). The frequency of intractable peri-
partum hemorrhage and placenta praevia/accreta, the main
indications for PH, significantly increased over the study
period.
Conclusions In Lombardy, the PH ratio increased
between 1996 and 2010. In our population, rising fre-
quency of CS and older maternal age may explain this
trend.
Keywords Hysterectomy � Peripartum � Temporal trend �Risk factor � Maternal age � Cesarean section
Introduction
Peripartum hysterectomy (PH) is a severe complication of
pregnancy. The indications of PH are generally uterine
rupture and life-threatening obstetric hemorrhage, often
due to uterine atony or placenta praevia or accreta. Its
frequency has been suggested to be used as an indicator of
maternal care [1–3] in industrialized countries, where
maternal deaths are rare.
Several studies reported that PH ratios increased during
the last decades, as for example in the USA [4] from 0.72/
1,000 in 1994–1995 to 0.83/1,000 deliveries in 2006–2007,
in Israeli [5] from 0.40/1,000 in 1988–1994 to 0.95/1,000
F. Parazzini � E. Ricci (&) � S. Cipriani � F. Chiaffarino �G. Bulfoni
Dipartimento Materno-Infantile, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’
Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Universita degli Studi
di Milano, via Commenda 12, 20122 Milan, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
E. Ricci � S. Cipriani � F. Chiaffarino
Epi2004, Gruppo per la Ricerca Epidemiologica,
20100 Milan, Italy
R. Bortolus
SSF Promozione della Ricerca, Azienda Ospedaliera
Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
V. Chiantera
Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology,
Campus Charite Mitte (CCM) and Campus Benjamin Franklin
(CBF), Charite Universitatsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
123
Arch Gynecol Obstet (2013) 287:223–228
DOI 10.1007/s00404-012-2547-4
in 2001–2007, and in the UK [6] a threefold increase
between 1994–2003, as compared to 1983–1993. The main
reported risk factors for PH are maternal age and delivery
by cesarean section (CS) [7–9]. Moreover, previous CS
may lead to an abnormal placentation during subsequent
pregnancies; placenta praevia and accreta are risk factors
for CS and PH [8, 10, 11].
In Italy, the CS rate arose consistently over the last
decades, from 17.5 % in 1992 to 39.8 % in 2007 [12]. In
Lombardy, the most populated Italian region, the frequency
of CS increased from 21.3 to 28.2 % [13]. Likewise,
maternal age at delivery has been steadily increasing in the
last decades [14].
We evaluated the temporal trends of PH ratios during
the period 1996–2010 in Lombardy, an Italian region of
about 10 million inhabitants [15], using data from the
Regional Healthcare Database. We aimed to assess whether
the PH frequency increased and, in this case, whether the
increase was explained by the main determinants’ modifi-
cation over time.
Methods
Since 1991, a standard form has been used to register all
discharges from public or private hospitals in Lombardy.
Data are reported in an Integrated Patients’ Database. This
Data Warehouse contains information on inpatient activity
provided to each patient by any hospital or clinic (public or
accredited private) belonging to the Regional Health Sys-
tem (RHS). The RHS provided reimbursement for hospital
admissions to each regional healthcare structure. The col-
lected data were validated because on the basis of this
information the healthcare providers (both public and pri-
vate) were reimbursed by the RHS for the services deliv-
ered to each patient.
We obtained data regarding all PH and deliveries from
obstetric departments over the period 1996–2010 by the
Lombardy Health Directorate. PH cases were identified
searching the database for the ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes:
68.31, 68.39—subtotal hysterectomy; 68.41, 68.49, 68.51,
68.59, 68.61, 68.69, 68.71, 68.79, 68.8, 68.9—total
hysterectomy.
Information on maternal age and mode of delivery was
obtained for all deliveries. For PH cases, type of hyster-
ectomy (total or subtotal) and indication for surgery were
recorded. PH ratios/1,000 deliveries in strata of age (\30,
30–39, C40 years), mode of delivery (vaginal delivery or
CS) and calendar year were computed. To account simul-
taneously for the effects of mode of delivery, calendar
period and maternal age, we used unconditional multiple
logistic regression, with maximum likelihood fitting, to
obtain odds ratios (OR) and their corresponding 95 %
confidence interval (CI). Poisson’s regression analysis was
used to test trend over time. Statistical significance was set
at P \ 0.05.
All analyses were carried out using SAS/STAT, version
9.1 software (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA).
Results
A total of 905 PH and 1,289,163 deliveries were recorded
between 1996 and 2010. The overall PH ratio was 0.70/
1,000 deliveries. During this period, the mean age at
delivery increased, from 30.1 years in 1996 to 31.8 years
in 2010, as well as the CS proportion, from 21.4 to 28.2 %.
The number of PH and ratios/1,000 deliveries are shown in
Table 1.
The PH ratio increased over time, being 0.60 in 1996
and 0.93/1,000 deliveries in 2010 (P \ 0.0001) (Fig 1a).
PH ratios/1,000 deliveries for mode of delivery and age
class are also shown in Fig. 1b and c respectively, over the
1996–2010 period. Women who delivered by CS (OR 5.66,
95 % CI 4.91–6.54) and older women were at increased
risk of PH (maternal age C40 vs. \30 years: OR 5.66,
95 % CI 4.48–7.15). Women who had a twin pregnancy
were at increased risk of PH in the univariate analysis, but
this finding was not statistically significant after adjusting
for maternal age and mode of delivery.
After including in the Poisson’s regression equation
calendar year, mode of delivery and maternal age, no sig-
nificant linear trend emerged in the PH ratio over time
(P = 0.28). The proportion of subtotal PH did not show
marked differences over the period (Table 2). The main
indication for PH was intractable peripartum hemorrhage
(65.7 %), mainly immediately postpartum (48.8 %). PH
due to hemorrhage showed a significant increase over time,
from 48.1 % in the 1996–1998 period to 72.5 % in the
2008–2010 period (P \ 0.0001). Patients with hemorrhage
as the only indication for PH were 352 (38.9 %), a pro-
portion increasing between 1996–1998 (35.1 %) and
2008–2010 (45.3 %).
The indication for surgery ‘‘placenta praevia/accreta’’
also showed a significant increase over the period
(P = 0.03). These findings remained statistically signifi-
cant after adjusting for age class at delivery.
Discussion
This study shows that the frequency of PH in Lombardy
increased over the 1996–2010 period. After taking into
account the effect of mode of delivery and maternal age in
the analysis of time trend, the PH increase over time was
no longer statistically significant.
224 Arch Gynecol Obstet (2013) 287:223–228
123
Fig. 1 a Ratio of PH/1,000 deliveries in the 1996–2010 period; b ratio of PH/1,000 vaginal deliveries or cesarean section; c ratio of PH/1,000
deliveries in women aged \30, 30–39 and C40
Table 1 Peripartum
hysterectomy (PH) in
Lombardy, 1996–2010
a 95 % Confidence intervalb For age class, mode of
delivery, singleton/twin
pregnancy, calendar periodc Reference category
No. of PH No. of
deliveries
Ratio/1,000
deliveries
Crude odds
ratioaAdjusted
odds ratioa,b
Calendar period
1996–1998 131 231,480 0.57 1c 1c
1999–2001 134 246,600 0.54 0.96 (0.76–1.22) 0.87 (0.69–1.11)
2002–2004 200 259,156 0.77 1.36 (1.09–1.70) 1.14 (0.91–1.42)
2005–2007 193 271,800 0.71 1.26 (1.01–1.57) 0.98 (0.79–1.23)
2008–2010 247 280,127 0.88 1.56 (1.26–1.93) 1.18 (0.95–1.46)
Maternal age at delivery (years)
\30 147 459,587 0.32 1c 1c
30–39 617 776,622 0.79 2.49 (2.08–2.98) 2.16 (1.80–2.58)
C40 141 52,954 2.66 8.34 (6.62–10.51) 5.66 (4.48–7.15)
Mode of delivery
Vaginal delivery 276 949,274 0.29 1c 1c
Cesarean section 629 339,889 1.85 6.38 (5.53–7.35) 5.66 (4.91–6.54)
Pregnancy
Singleton 876 1,274,002 0.69 1c 1c
Multiple 29 15,161 1.91 2.79 (1.92–4.03) 1.20 (0.83–1.74)
Arch Gynecol Obstet (2013) 287:223–228 225
123
Our data should be considered totally representative of
the cases of PH in the region: in Lombardy all hospital
admissions and surgical procedures are registered by law in
a regional administrative database. With regard to the
quality of diagnosis, for administrative reasons, all medical
records are reviewed, and diagnosis confirmed, by local
medical officers. Among the strengths, we also have to
consider the population-based design and the opportunity
to analyze temporal trends using similar methods of data
collection.
The frequency of PH has been reported to range from
0.24 to 8.9 per 1,000 deliveries, higher ratios being
reported in low income countries [16]. In developed
countries, the PH incidence showed a wide variation,
ranging from 0.2 to 2.28/1,000 deliveries [4, 8, 10, 17–29].
The estimate reported in our population is consistent with
these findings.
Some epidemiological studies have suggested that the
PH frequency is rising. For example, a 25 % increase has
been reported between 1994 and 2006 in the USA [30], as
well as in a population-based study [31] conducted using
the Washington State Birth Certificate Registry in the
period 1987–2006 (from 0.25 to 0.82/1,000 deliveries).
Consistently, in our sample the PH ratio arose by 37 %
(from 0.57 to 0.88/1,000 deliveries) in the 15-year period
between 1996 and 2010.
CS and abnormal placentation [7, 8, 10, 11] are recog-
nized risk factors for PH. The increasing proportion of
abnormal placentation as indication for PH (from 12.9 to
21.5 %), suggested that the rising CS frequency is a risk
factor for PH in subsequent pregnancies, in our population.
The risk of PH was 3.5 time higher in women who had a
previous CS, in a case–control study conducted in the UK
[8], and the risk associated with previous CS was higher
with increasing number of cesarean deliveries (OR 18.6
with 2 or more). In our study, the PH frequency was about
sixfold higher in women delivering by CS in comparison
with vaginal delivery; regrettably, we lack the information
about reproductive history.
In our study, older age was a determinant of higher risk
of PH, consistently with literature [8, 9]. The increase, in
Lombardy, of mean age at delivery (?1.7 years between
1996 and 2010) and CS frequency (from 21.4 to 28.2 %
over the same period) may, at least in part, explain the
Table 2 Type and indication for peripartum hysterectomy (PH)
1996–1998, No.131
(14.3 %)
1999–2001, No.134
(14.8 %)
2002–2004, No.200
(22.2 %)
2005–2007, No.193
(21.4 %)
2008–2010, No.247
(27.2 %)
Total,
No.896
Total PH 85 (66.9) 89 (66.9) 124 (62.3) 135 (73.3) 166 (68.0) 600 (67.0)
Subtotal PH 42 (33.1) 44 (33.1) 75 (37.7) 57 (29.7) 78 (32.0) 296 (33.0)
Indicationa
Hemorrhage 63 (48.1) 77 (57.5) 126 (63.0) 144 (74.6) 179 (72.5) 589 (65.7)
Prepartum 7 (5.3) 10 (7.5) 12 (6.0) 19 (9.8) 10 (4.1) 58 (6.5)
Early
postpartum
43 (32.6) 55 (41.0) 90 (45.0) 103 (53.4) 146 (59.1) 437 (48.8)
Late
postpartum
10 (7.6) 6 (4.5) 14 (7.0) 15 (7.8) 16 (6.5) 61 (6.8)
Unspecified 3 (2.3) 6 (4.5) 10 (5.0) 7 (3.6) 7 (2.8) 33 (3.7)
Coagulopathy 16 (12.2) 17 (12.7) 15 (7.5) 17 (8.8) 17 (6.7) 82 (9.1)
Pelvic
hematoma
3 (2.3) 4 (3.0) 3 (1.5) 1 (0.5) 5 (2.0) 16 (1.8)
Uterine atony 8 (6.1) 10 (7.5) 14 (7.0) 13 (6.7) 7 (2.8) 52 (5.7)
Uterine rupture 11 (8.3) 7 (5.2) 12 (6.0) 9 (4.7) 15 (6.1) 54 (6.0)
Placenta accreta/
previa
16 (12.9) 23 (17.2) 45 (22.5) 44 (22.8) 53 (21.5) 181 (20.0)
Surgical
complication
6 (4.5) 6 (4.5) 7 (3.5) 6 (3.1) 9 (3.6) 34 (3.8)
Obstetric shock 8 (6.1) 8 (6.0) 6 (3.0) 14 (7.2) 15 (6.1) 51 (5.6)
Genital cancer/
fibroids
7 (5.3) 9 (6.7) 22 (11.0) 11 (5.7) 11 (4.4) 60 (6.7)
Sometimes the sum does not add up to the total because of unreported/not defined indicationa Some cases had more than one indication
226 Arch Gynecol Obstet (2013) 287:223–228
123
increase of PH ratios observed in our population. Along
this line, the age- and mode of delivery-adjusted temporal
trend was not statistically significant.
It has also been suggested that PH is more common in
multiple gestation [28]. Overall, we found that, after
adjusting for age and mode of delivery, the effect of
multiple pregnancy was not statistically significant.
Moreover, the estimated OR diminished from 2.79 to 1.20,
possibly indicating that the apparent relationship was due
to a greater proportion of CS in multiple births and older
age of women with twin gestation.
Potential limitations should also be considered. The main
limitation of this analysis was the lack of information on
indication for CS and reproductive history, that prevented us
to analyze some important factors. Moreover, when the
indication for PH was ‘‘hemorrhage’’, we were not able to
further investigate, if missing, the cause of hemorrhage
(uterine atony, placenta praevia/accreta, uterine rupture).
Conclusions
Our data showed that in Lombardy, over a 15-year period,
the PH ratios/1,000 deliveries increased. This trend was
largely explained by the changing frequency of CS and by
the older maternal age observed in our population, over the
1996–2010 period.
Acknowledgments This study was partially funded by Fondazione
IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, in the framework
of ‘‘Fondi Ricerca Corrente’’. The authors thank Dr. Carlo Zocchetti,
Lombardy Region, Health Directorate, for providing data.
Conflict of interest No competing financial interests exist.
References
1. Baskett TF, Sternadel J (1998) Maternal intensive care and near-
miss mortality in obstetrics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:981–984
2. Mantel GD, Buchmann E, Rees H, Pattinson RC (1998) Severe
acute maternal morbidity: a pilot study of a definition for a near-
miss. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:985–990
3. Drife JO (1993) Maternal ‘‘near miss’’ reports? BMJ 307:1087–
1088
4. Bateman BT, Mhyre JM, Callaghan WM, Kuklina EV (2012)
Peripartum hysterectomy in the United States: nationwide
14 year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:63.e1–63.e8
5. Orbach A, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, Mazor M, Holcberg G, Sheiner
E (2011) Peripartum cesarean hysterectomy: critical analysis of
risk factors and trends over the years. J Matern Fetal Neonatal
Med 24:480–484
6. Yoong W, Massiah N, Oluwu A (2006) Obstetric hysterectomy:
changing trends over 20 years in a multiethnic high risk popu-
lation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274:37–40
7. Gungorduk K, Yildirim G, Dugan N, Polat I, Sudolmus S, Ark C
(2009) Peripartum hysterectomy in Turkey: a case–control study.
J Obstet Gynaecol 29:722–728
8. Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, Brocklehurst P, United King-
dom Obstetric Surveillance System Steering Committee (2008)
Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol
111:97–105
9. Selo-Ojeme DO, Bhattacharjee P, Izuwa-Njoku NF, Kadir RA
(2005) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary London
hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 271:154–159
10. Karayalcın R, Ozcan S, Ozyer S, Mollamahmutoglu L, Danısman
N (2011) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol
Obstet 283:723–727
11. Tapisiz OL, Altinbas SK, Yirci B, Cenksoy P, Kaya AE, Dede S,
Kandemir O (2012). Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a
tertiary hospital in Ankara, Turkey: a 5-year review. Arch
Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jun 29. (Epub ahead of print)
12. Declercq E, Young R, Cabral H, Ecker J (2011) Is a rising
cesarean delivery inevitable? Trends in industrialised countries,
1987 to 2007. Birth 38(99):106
13. Parazzini F, Bulfoni G, Cipriani S, Ricci E (2010) Obstetric
admission in Lombardy hospital, 2008. (I ricoveri ostetrici negli
ospedali della Lombardia, 2008). It J Gynecol Obstet 22:13–31
14. ISTAT. Fecondita in ripresa e calendario riproduttivo postcipato
(rising fertility and delayed age at delivery). http://noiitalia2011.
istat.it/index.php?id=7&user_100ind_pi1%5Bid_pagina%5D=24
&cHash=ae07770fb46269b70a504c61075100f5. Accessed May
2012
15. ISTAT. Demografia in cifre. www.demo.istat. Accessed May
2012
16. Machado LS (2011) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: inci-
dence, indications, risk factors and outcome. N Am J Med Sci
3:358–361
17. Engelsen IB, Albrechtsen S, Iversen OE (2001) Peripartum hys-
terectomy—incidence and maternal morbidity. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand 80:409–412
18. Langdana M, Geary W, Haw D, Keane F (2001) Peripartum
hysterectomy in the 1990s: any new lessons? J Obstet Gynaecol
21:121–123
19. Kwee A, Boto ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW (2006) Emergency
peripartum hysterectomy: a prospective study in the Netherlands.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 124:187–192
20. Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M (2003) Identifying risk
factor for peripartum cesarean hysterectomy. A population based
study. J Reprod Med 48:622–626
21. Christopoulos P, Hassiakos D, Tsitoura A, Panoulis K, Papadias
K, Vitoratos N (2011) Obstetric hysterectomy. A review of cases
over 16 years. J Obstet Gynaecol 31:139–141
22. Kastner ES, Figueroa R, Garry D, Maulik D (2002) Emergency
peripartum hysterectomy: experience at a community teaching
hospital. Obstet Gynecol 99:971–975
23. Zelop CM, Harlow BL, Frigoletto FD Jr, Safon LE, Saltzman DH
(1993) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 168:1443–1448
24. Bakshi S, Meyer BA (2000) Indications for and outcomes of
emergency peripartum hysterectomy. A five-year review. J Re-
prod Med 45:733–737
25. Forna F, Miles AM, Jamieson DJ (2004) Emergency peripartum
hysterectomy: a comparison of cesarean and postpartum hyster-
ectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:1440–1444
26. Kacmar J, Bhimani L, Boyd M, Shah-Hosseini R, Peipert J
(2003) Route of delivery as a risk factor for emergent peripartum
hysterectomy: a case–control study. Obstet Gynecol 102:141–145
27. Stanco LM, Schrimmer DB, Paul RH, Mishell DR Jr (1993)
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy and associated risk factors.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:879–883
28. Francois K, Ortiz J, Harris C, Foley MR, Elliott JP (2005) Is
peripartum hysterectomy more common in multiple gestations?
Obstet Gynecol 105:1369–1372
Arch Gynecol Obstet (2013) 287:223–228 227
123
29. Glaze S, Ekwalanga P, Roberts G, Lange I, Birch C, Rosengarten
A, Jarrell J, Ross S (2008) Peripartum hysterectomy: 1999 to
2006. Obstet Gynecol 111:732–738
30. Callaghan WM, Kuklina EV, Berg CJ (2010) Trends in post-
partum hemorrhage: United States, 1994–2006. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 202:353.e1–353.e6
31. Bodelon C, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Schiff MA, Reed SD (2009) Factors
associated with peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol
114:115–123
228 Arch Gynecol Obstet (2013) 287:223–228
123