1

Technical Indicator Description Grid 2013/14 Annual Performance Plan

Contents 4.2 PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................................................... 3

SO: 4.2.1.1 To improve efficiency by implementing the necessary information technology infrastructure and systems ...................................... 3

SO: 4.2.1.3 Ensure adherence to policies and standards on logistical services .................................................................................................... 7

SO: 4.2.1.4 To provide effective communication services and events management ........................................................................................... 8

SO: 4.2.1.5 To ensure a safe and healthy physical environment ........................................................................................................................10

SO: 4.1.1.6 To prevent fraud and corruption .....................................................................................................................................................11

SO: 4.2.1.7 To ensure an efficient and effective system of financial and assets management, governance and controls in the Department and in relation to its public entities .............................................................................................................................................................................11

4.3 PROGRAMME 2: HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING AND MONITORING COORDINATION .................................... 14

SO: 4.3.1.2 Establish and maintain a coherent career management and career information system by 2014 ....................................................14

SO: 4.3.1.3 Promote research and innovation in the Higher Education and Training Sector by publishing an annual academic journal of contributions from stakeholders in the sector annually ....................................................................................................................................15

SO: 4.3.1.4 Manage and maintain credible planning and budgeting process for the DHET annually ...................................................................16

2

SO: 4.3.1.5 Pursue and strengthen bilateral relations with priority countries in Africa, Middle East, South and the North as well as with multilateral agencies such as COMEDAF, SADC, AU, ADEA, UNESCO, ILO, OECD and the Commonwealth .........................................................18

SO: 4.3.1.6 Maintain database of international engagements of all public post school institutions and publish an annual report of international collaborations ...................................................................................................................................................................................................19

SO: 4.3.1.7 Support, advise and monitor the implementation of the post-school education system legislative framework annually ..................20

SO: 4.3.1.8 Establish a well-functioning social inclusion, equity and transformation services within the DHET entities ......................................21

SO: 4.3.1.9 Monitor and support the implementation of the National Qualification Framework Act .................................................................22

4.4 PROGRAMME 3: UNIVERSITY EDUCATION .................................................................................................................................. 23

SO: 4.4.1.1 Expand the higher education sector in order to increase equitable access with success ..................................................................23

SO: 4.4.1.2 Improve success rate in higher education studies at public institutions and therefore increase graduate output by 2014 ...............29

SO: 4.4.1.3 Monitor good governance and management of the higher education system in order to build capacity and efficiency ...................33

SO: 4.4.1.4 To develop and enhance the research capacity and productivity of universities by 2014 .................................................................35

SO: 4.4.1.5 To maintain and enhance the Higher education Management Information System (HEMIS)............................................................38

4.5 PROGRAMME 4: VOCATIONAL AND CONTINUING EDUCATION .................................................................................................. 39

SO: 4.5.1.1 Increase access to and improve success in programmes leading to intermediate and high-level learning by 2014 ...........................39

SO: 4.5.1.2 Strengthen the institutional capacity of VET institutions to improve their performance and efficiency ............................................47

SO: 4.5.1.3 Manage and administer a credible and efficient examinations and assessment system for VET institutions ....................................52

SO: 4.5.1.4 Provide support for the implementation of a monitoring, evaluation and research for the improvement of the vocational education and training system ..........................................................................................................................................................................................53

4.6 PROGRAMME 5: SKILLS DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................................................................................56

SO: 4.6.1.1 Provide a dynamic interface between the workplace and learning institutions and to promote quality learning at work and for work by 2016 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................56

SO: 4.6.1.2 Promote the alignment of skills development outputs to the needs of the workplace and to the broader growth needs of the country’s economy ...........................................................................................................................................................................................60

3

4.2 PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION

SO: 4.2.1.1 To improve efficiency by implementing the necessary information technology infrastructure and systems

1.

Indicator title ICT maturity level achieved

Short definition ICT governance maturity level 2 achieved by implementing the necessary infrastructure and systems

Purpose To measures progress made in terms of ICT infrastructure implementation

Source Self-Assessments Method of calculation Achieved maturity level measured against developed and in line with DPSA framework

Data limitation Skilled assessors

Type efficiency Calculation type Non-cumulative

Reporting period Annually New indicator No Desired performance Improved ICT governance processes to bring about business value through the of ICT Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: GITO

2.

Indicator title % network connectivity uptime Short definition Increase network uptime and accessibility to job related functions

Purpose Achieve 99.99% uptime and allow an official to operate from any location using any connected device

Source Self-Assessment

4

Method of calculation Through SITA network monitoring tools and monthly service level management reports

Data limitation Accuracy of reports, availability of network management

Type Output Calculation type Non-cumulative

Reporting period Bi-Annually New indicator No Desired performance 99.99% Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: GITO

3.

Indicator title Availability of IT services Short definition 24/7 Availability and accessibility of IT services to DHET staff Purpose Allow an official to operate from any location using any

connected device and have access to the desired information

Source User satisfaction report on Enterprise Portal Network Uptime Reports

Method of calculation Comparisons between various sources will be drawn and aggregated to a single

Data limitation Quality of user surveys accuracy of network statistics Type Outcome Calculation type Non-cumulative Reporting period Bi-annually New indicator No Desired performance Accessibility for all DHET staff Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: GITO

5

4.

4.1.1.2 To provide effective and efficient human resource planning and management services Indicator title Period it takes to fill a vacancy from the date of advertisement (in terms of months) Short definition Four months to fill a vacancy Purpose To ensure sufficient human resource and compliance with the public service regulations Public Service Commission

norms and standards Source Post establishment and management plan for filling of vacancies Method of calculation Count number of days it takes from advertising a post to actual appointment of a candidates Data limitation Requirements such as:

(a)Candidates having to serve a notice with current employer (b)Vetting /screening requirements and NIA responsiveness after a recommendation is made (c)Period of verification of qualifications after a recommendation is made

Type Output Calculation type Cumulative Reporting period Bi-annually New indicator No Desired performance Four month to fill a vacancy

Responsibility Sub-Programme Manager: HRM&D

5.

Indicator title Vacancy rate in the department Short definition % of vacant posts in the Department as a proportion of funded posts Purpose To measure the vacancy rate within the department and to plan the filling thereof to deliver on departments strategic

objectives. Source Post establishment

Method of calculation Number of posts that are unfilled as a percentage of funded posts in the establishment Data limitation Posts that are temporary or on contract must be counted as filled

Posts that are additional to the establishment may not be fully funded Calculation type Cumulative Reporting period Bi-Annually New indicator No Desired performance 10% Responsibility Sub-Programme Manager: HRM&D

6.

Indicator title Number of day to resolve disciplinary cases Short definition Days to resolve disciplinary cases Purpose To measure efficiency in managing disciplinary cases Source Number of employees who have been charged for misconduct Method of calculation Actual number of employees charged with misconduct Data limitation Employees may take sentence on appeal Type Cumulative

6

8.

Indicator title Compliance with performance management framework

Short definition 100% compliance with performance management framework

Purpose To measure the level of compliance with PMSP and manage performance by rewarding good performance addressing poor performance

Source Performance appraisal reports Method of calculation Number of staff that submit performance agreements in time and quarterly ,half-yearly and annual performance

appraisal

Calculation type Number of days it take from the date when charges are preferred to the date of passing a sentence Reporting period Bi-Annually New indicator No Desired performance 90 Days Responsibility Sub-Programme Manager: HRM&D

7.

Indicator title % of the human resources strategic planning framework Short definition 98% Compliance with Human Resource Strategic Framework Purpose To measure compliance with the Public Service Regulation Source Assessment and audits Method of calculation − Availability of HR plan

− Monthly monitoring / oversight report − Appointment of competent staff − Expenditure according to the allocated compensation budget (to be confirmed)

Data limitation Insufficient funding and lack of capacity in terms of personnel. Type Efficiency Calculation type Non-cumulative Reporting period Annually New indicator No Desired performance Proper and efficient use of human resources Responsibility Sub-Programme Manager: HRM&D

7

Data limitation Non-submission of performance work plans

Type Cumulative Calculation type Number of staff who comply Reporting period Annually New indicator No Desired performance All employees submit performance agreements on time and PMDS framework adhere to

Responsibility Sub-Programme Manager: HRM&D

SO: 4.2.1.3 Ensure adherence to policies and standards on logistical services

9.

Indicator title % compliance of SCM Short definition Compliance of SCM transactional processes complying with SCM policies Purpose It monitors compliance and provide feedback to the extent to which legal prescripts are adhere and design ways to deal

with expectations Source The LOGIS system and supporting documents filed in batches Method of calculation Each order is a unit of measurement and assessed against the SCM policies Data limitation There are no data limitation for this indicator, but there are very high volumes especially if manual count is involved Type Activity ( compliance) Calculation type Cumulative Reporting period Quarterly New indicator No Desired performance 100% compliance Responsibility Sub-Programme Manager: Logistical Service

10.

Indicator title Period of time to pay invoices from service providers from the day the invoice was received (in terms of days) Short definition Limit the number of days to pay invoices from service providers to 20 days from the day of receipt by 2015/16 Purpose It measures the extent of compliance in 20 day payment regulation Source LOGIS system Method of calculation Simple count of the number of days from the day of receipt of invoice to payment thereof Data limitation No data limitation, but delays may results from queried invoices Type Efficiency

8

Reporting cycle Bi-annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance All payments made within 20 day of receipt of invoice Responsibility Sub-Programme Manager: SCM and Logistical Service

SO: 4.2.1.4 To provide effective communication services and events management

11.

Indicator title Functional DHET website Short definition The functionality of DHET website with quarterly newsletter. Purpose To ensure extended reach to internal and external audience in the effort to keep them up to date with information Source Observe number of hits (browser visit) and self-assessment Method of calculation Feedback messages received through amongst others call centre queries Data limitation Appointments of skilled web developer and manager Type Output Calculation type Quarterly Reporting period Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Achieve functional website that is interactive and updated Responsibility Sub-Programme Manager: Media Liaison and Communication

12.

Indicator title Number of DHET internal newsletters published

Short definition Write and publish articles Purpose To inform staff and stakeholders about programmes and achievements of DHET Source Collect pictures and articles from events Method of calculation Frequency of events and publishing of newsletter Data limitation No permanent and qualified journalist. No professional photographer Type Output Calculation type accumulative Reporting period Quarterly New indicator none Desired performance Regularly publish every quarter

9

Responsibility Sub-Programme Manager: Media Liaison and Communication

13.

Indicator title % of responses to queries via call centre Short definition Response to queries Purpose To measure and monitor the responsiveness of the call centre Source Call centre and presidential hotline Method of calculation Number of queries received and total hours taken to resolve Data limitation Queries referred to entities and institutions and incorrectly channelled queries to DHET Type Efficiency Calculation type Cumulative Reporting period Quarterly New indicator No Desired performance 100% (All) resolution of queries with 48 hours Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Call Centre

14.

Indicator title Number of exhibitions / Public Relations events published annually Short definition 8 exhibitions and Public Relations events annually Purpose To measure the ability of the department to communicate with the public Source Actual public events held Method of calculation A simple count each time a public relations event is conducted Data limitation None Type Efficiency Calculation type Cumulative Reporting period Quarterly New indicator No Desired performance 8 public events annually Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Media Liaison and Communication

10

SO: 4.2.1.5 To ensure a safe and healthy physical environment

15.

Indicator title Percentage compliance with Occupational Health and Safety Act Short definition 99 % compliance with Occupational Health and Safety Purpose To ensure a safe and physical environment Source Acts and Policies Method of calculation Report all injuries on duties, regardless where it occurred (sites). Ensure compliance then with the Act and rectify the

problem Data limitation Depend if injuries on duty are reported and shortcomings rectified Type Efficiency Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Ensure 100% safe working area-5 star NOSA rating Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Security Services management

16.

Indicator title % compliance with security directives Short definition 95% compliance with security directives by 2013/14 Purpose To measure and monitor fraud and corruption activities in the department Source Policies, strategies on fraud and corruption; reports on activities Method of calculation Availability of strategy and number of cases reported Data limitation False cases; referred cases to entities and institutions Type Efficiency Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Strategy implemented and dealt with cases reported Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: DDG: Corporate Services

11

SO: 4.1.1.6 To prevent fraud and corruption

17.

Indicator title Fraud and anti-corruption strategy developed and implemented

Short definition Fraud and anti-corruption strategy developed and implemented by 2013/14 Purpose To measure and monitor fraud and corruption activities in the department Source Policies, strategies on fraud and corruption; reports on activities Method of calculation Availability of strategy and number of cases reported Data limitation False cases; referred cases to entities and institutions Type Efficiency Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Strategy implemented and dealt with cases reported Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Risk Management

SO: 4.2.1.7 To ensure an efficient and effective system of financial and assets management, governance and controls in the Department and in relation to its public entities

18.

Indicator title Period of time taken to process transfers and payments (in terms of days) Short definition Number of days taken to process transfers and payments Purpose Measure efficiency in processing payment Source Payments Method of calculation Number of days taken to pay invoices from the date of receipt Data limitation Invoices with incomplete information e.g. Vat registration number, no or incorrect bank account details,

BAS system and Safety net system is down and changes to bank account details that need to be verified by the Reserve Bank.

Type Efficiency Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Within 5 days Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: SCM & Logistical Services

12

19.

Indicator title Approved Financial statements Short definition Financial statements submitted to the Auditor-General Purpose To comply with the Public Finance Management Act Source Financial data from systems within the Department Method of calculation Simple count Data limitation Information no linked to systems that needs to be included in the Annual Financial Statements Type Efficiency Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Unqualified Audit Report Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Finance

20.

Indicator title Percentage compliance to PFMA Short definition 100% Compliance to PFMA Purpose The indicator measures compliance of the DHET with PFMA

Source Internal stakeholder and financial systems Method of calculation Deviation or non-deviations from PFMA prescripts as accounted for in monthly financial reports

Data limitation Non-submission of information by stakeholders on time and system downtime Type Efficiency Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator None Desired performance To submit required PFMA reports on time to National Treasury Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Finance

21.

Indicator title Number of agreements concluded and projects supported Short definition 10 Agreements concluded and projects supported Purpose Compliance to PFMA and ensure achievement of outcomes. Source Business plans and reports Method of calculation Simple count Data limitation Project managers do not submit reports on time.

13

Type Outcomes and output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Efficient use of funds and achievement of outcomes. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Development Support

22.

Indicator title Percentage of assets lost and /unauthorized movements Short definition 1% Assets lost and unauthorized movements Purpose Enables the department to manage the control systems and track asset losses or any unauthorised

movements Source Asset register Method of calculation Office inspections Data limitation Movement of assets by users without involving asset management and not completing movement forms Type Efficiency Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance No losses/unauthorised movements Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Finance

14

4.3 PROGRAMME 2: HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING AND MONITORING COORDINATION

SO: 4.3.1.1 Establish and maintain an integrated education and training management information system, linking all providers of education and training into a single system, to provide accurate data on skills supply and demand in the country

23.

Indicator title Percentage of public institutions with data integrated into the education and training management information system

Short definition Integration of data from public institutions Purpose To maintain an integrated education and training system in all public institutions Source DHET management information system Method of calculation Number of public institutions with data integrated divided by total number of public institutions * 100 Data limitation None, as the number of public institutions is known Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance It is desirable that 100% of institutions have their data integrated into the DHET management information

system Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Information Systems Coordination

SO: 4.3.1.2 Establish and maintain a coherent career management and career information system by 2014

24.

Indicator title Modules developed and approved by DG Short definition Development of a coherent career management and information system established (module based) Purpose To develop and implement a coherent career management and information system for the post-school sector Source Career management and information system Method of calculation Count of the number of system modules developed and completed Data limitation N/A Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance The full system with 2 (all) modules to be developed and implemented

15

Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Information Systems Coordination

25.

Indicator title Numbers of users reached by career guidance services Short definition Reach of career guidance service Purpose To ensure that career guidance service offered by the Career Advice Service Project reach as many people as

possible Source SAQA/DHET reach database Method of calculation Count of users reached Data limitation Reach is not always accurately quantifiable e.g. radio programme and exhibitions Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance It is desired that as many users as possible are reached by the career advice service Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Information Systems Coordination

SO: 4.3.1.3 Promote research and innovation in the Higher Education and Training Sector by publishing an annual academic journal of contributions from stakeholders in the sector annually

26.

Indicator title A research bulletin by DG Short definition Number of academic journals published for Higher Education and Training Purpose To promote research development and innovation in the higher education and training sector. Source DHET Method of calculation Simple count Data limitation N/A Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance 1 journal per year Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Research Coordination, Monitoring and Evaluation

16

SO: 4.3.1.4 Manage and maintain credible planning and budgeting process for the DHET annually

27.

Indicator title Annual DHET Annual Performance Plan developed with performance indicators and targets approved by the Minister of Higher Education and Training

Short definition DHET Annual Performance Plan developed Purpose This indicator tracks the development of Annual Performance Plan and performance indicators used to focus

the Department’s service delivery performance obligation and to track progress thereof. Source The Annual Performance Plan is a Departmental Plan compiled on the basis of inputs from various internal

business units, as is signed off by Minister. Method of calculation Each Annual Performance Plan is counted once for each year it is developed Data limitation None. Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance The APP is able to accurately measure and report on performance

Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Strategic Planning

28.

Indicator title Annual MTEF Bid developed and approved by the DG Short definition Annual MTEF priority Bid for the Department of Higher Education and Training developed Purpose The development of the Department’s bid for the funding of its Medium Term Expenditure Framework

priorities for the implementation of its Strategic Plan Source A bid document signed off by the Minister Method of calculation Each priority bid is counted once for each year it is developed Data limitation None Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance The bid document clearly identifies the budget requirements and the assumptions and costing are clearly

evident in the bid document Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Strategic Planning

29.Indicator title Number of quarterly performance progress reports on the implementation of the strategic plan Short definition Quarterly performance progress reports on the implementation of the strategic plan and the Annual

Performance Plan produced

17

Purpose This indicator tracks the number of departmental quarterly performance reports against the implementation of the Annual Performance Plan compiled to track progress on the achievement of its set targets

Source A signed of quarterly report by the DG Method of calculation Each performance report is counted once for each quarter it is compiled Data limitation The accuracy of reports depends on the reliability of the information reported by various business units in the

Department Type Output Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance All reports are compiled and are accurate, the department is able to track progress on the implementation of

its Annual Performance Plan and introduce corrective measures where necessary. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Strategic Planning

30.

Indicator title Investment report produced Short definition Report on government investment in education and training and the returns thereof produced annually Purpose This indicator tracks the level of government investment in education on an annual basis and the associated

returns to inform future planning Source The report is compiled on the basis of information extracted from accountability documents such as the

Annual Reports, Estimates of National Expenditure and various research reports. A submission to DG Method of calculation Each report is counted once each year it is produced Data limitation None Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance The report is developed with a view to track the level of government investment in education on an annual

basis – a compiled report informs future planning and mobilisation of resources Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Strategic Planning

18

SO: 4.3.1.5 Pursue and strengthen bilateral relations with priority countries in Africa, Middle East, South and the North as well as with multilateral agencies such as COMEDAF, SADC, AU, ADEA, UNESCO, ILO, OECD and the Commonwealth

31.

Indicator title International relations operational framework strategy developed and implementation reports produced and approved by the DG

Short definition International relations operational framework strategy Purpose To streamline international relations within the Department and ensure alignment with strategic priorities

and government’s foreign policy Source A framework document approved by the Minister Method of calculation One framework document Data limitation None Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance The framework streamlines all bilateral relations with priority countries Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Africa and Middle East

32.

Indicator title Engagement plans developed and implementation report compiled and approved by the DG Short definition Implementation plans with priority countries and multilateral agencies developed Purpose To ensure bilateral agreements signed are implemented and relations strengthened Source Signed bilateral agreements Method of calculation Implementation plans developed Data limitation Political instability and changes in political relations Type Activities Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Plans developed and implemented Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: International Relations

19

SO: 4.3.1.6 Maintain database of international engagements of all public post school institutions and publish an annual report of international collaborations

33.

Indicator title A publication produced and approved by the DG Short definition Publication on international cooperation Purpose To provide a comprehensive overview of the Department’s international engagements and how they support

strategic plan and priorities Source A publication on international cooperation is approved Method of calculation Count of publication Data limitation None Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non- cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Publication produced Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Global Partnerships

34.

Indicator title Database of international engagements of all public post-school institutions maintained Short definition Database of international engagements Purpose Track all international activities of institutions to ensure alignment with department’s strategic priorities and

government’s foreign policy Source Database Method of calculation Existence of database Data limitation Institutions do not submit reports Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non- cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Database maintained and up to date Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Global Partnership

20

SO: 4.3.1.7 Support, advise and monitor the implementation of the post-school education system legislative framework annually

35.

Indicator title % of Litigations dealt with Short definition 100% (all) litigations against the DHET dealt with Purpose Tracks the number of court cases against the Minister and the progress made in managing them within the

timeframes set by court rules. Source Court papers, pleadings, affidavits and judgments. Method of calculation Counting the number of cases against the Minister or Department against number of default judgments

awarded against the Minister. Data limitation The percentage may be incorrect if the original case was not served on the Minister due to incorrect citation

and the default judgment must be recommended to correct the outcome of the court judgment. Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance That all court cases are dealt with within the court rules and timeframes. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Legal Services

36.

Indicator title % of legislations and regulations drafted and amended Short definition 100% of legislation and regulation drafted and amended Purpose Track the number of Bills and draft Regulations required by Minister to be drafted against the Acts and

Regulations promulgated. Source Bills, draft Regulations. Method of calculation Counting the number of Bills and draft regulations against the Acts and Regulations promulgated. Data limitation Some Bills may be identified originally as omnibus Bills to cover amendments to more than one Act but in the

end the name of the Bill changes because one Act is amended. Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance That all legislation is promulgated into law. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Legislation

37. Indicator title % of legal opinions and agreement Short definition 100% (all) of legal opinions and agreements drafted to support the post school framework

21

Purpose Track the number of legal opinions and agreements Source Bills, draft Regulations. Method of calculation Counting the number of legal opinions and agreements provided. Data limitation Number of legal opinions and agreements Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance That all legal opinions and agreements are provided in line with the law. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Legal and Legislative Services

SO: 4.3.1.8 Establish a well-functioning social inclusion, equity and transformation services within the DHET entities

38.

Indicator title A monitoring report on the implementation of the Social Inclusion Policy Framework compiled and approved by the Director-General

Short definition One monitoring reports produced on the implementation of the policy Purpose To report on progress and impact of the social inclusion and equity policy. Source Existence of a monitoring report submitted to Minister Method of calculation Counted of reports Data limitation None Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator Yes Desired performance A monitoring report covering all required areas of implementation of the social inclusion and equity policy by

institutions of higher learning. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Social Inclusion and Equity

22

SO: 4.3.1.9 Monitor and support the implementation of the National Qualification Framework Act

39.

Indicator title A Monitoring and evaluation report on the mandatory role of the Quality Councils and SAQA compiled and approved by the DG

Short definition One monitoring instrument developed in consultation with the Inter-departmental Steering Committee, SAQA and the Quality Councils

Purpose To monitor and support actions needed to implement the statutory functions assigned to the Minister, DG, SAQA, CHE, UMALUSI and QCTO in terms of the NQF Act

Source Existence of formal approved instruments and consequent report count Method of calculation Count Data limitation Depends on availability of information for SAQA and the Quality Councils Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance the monitoring instrument and report covers all relevant situation functions Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: National Qualification Framework

40.

Indicator title Annual Ministerial policy guidelines developed and approved by the Minister Short definition Guideline on the strategy and priorities for the NQF in terms of section 8 (2)(C) of NQF act 2008 Purpose To set out strategy and priorities for the implementation of NQF. To update, build on and augment the

previous guideline document. Source Approved Ministerial gazette (government gazette) Method of calculation Qualitative outcome Data limitation NQF Act of 2008 Section 8 (2)(C) provides that guidance may be update annually Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Guidelines cover all relevant situation function. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: National Qualification Framework

23

41.

Indicator title % and number of request for advice answered within standards approved by the Branch Head Short definition 100% (all) requests for advice answered within standards Purpose Provide advice to the Minister on determining the NQF policies Source Policy guideline documents Method of calculation Qualitative outcome Data limitation Depends on the availability of information for SAQA and the Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Guidelines cover all relevant situation function. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: National Qualification Framework

4.4 PROGRAMME 3: UNIVERSITY EDUCATION

SO: 4.4.1.1 Expand the higher education sector in order to increase equitable access with success

42.

Indicator title Number of students enrolled in higher education studies at universities Short definition 935 710 students enrolled in higher education studies at universities by 2013/14 Purpose To track the extent of growth and expansion of the system Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on a census date per academic period1 Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities Type Input (registered students - enrolment) Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Actual headcount reported to equal or exceed projected headcount Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate:

HEMIS

1An academic period is either a semester enrolment or an annual enrolment

24

43.

Indicator title % headcount enrolment at Universities over population 20 to 24 year old Short definition Total (18) headcount enrolment at Universities over population 20 to 24 year old to reach 19.3 by 2013/14 Purpose To track the extent of excess and growth of the system Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by University on a census date per academic period Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by Universities Type Input (registered students enrolment) Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Actual first time enrolled students reported to equal or exceed projected first time enrolled students Responsibility Directorate: HEMIS (Supported by Directorate : Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation)

44.

Indicator title Number of first time enrolments at universities Short definition 183 893 of first time headcount enrolments at universities in a particular academic year Purpose To track the extent of access to and growth of the system Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on a census date per academic period Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities Type Input (registered students - enrolment) Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Actual first time enrolled students reported to equal or exceed projected first time enrolled students Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate:

HEMIS

45.

Indicator title Number of public higher education institutions established Short definition 1 public higher education institutions established by 2013/14 Purpose Tracks progress on the process to increase the number of public institutions offering higher education

programmes Source Government Gazette

25

Method of calculation Promulgation of seat of new higher education institution Data limitation none Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative over the MTEF New indicator No Desired performance 1 new university established as a juristic person in terms of the Higher Education Act by March 2014 Responsibility DDG University Education supported by CD Academic Planning and Management (Branch Project)

46.

Indicator title Number of public higher education institutions involved in foundation phase teacher education Short definition 20 public higher education institutions that offer training in foundation phase teacher education by 2013/14 Purpose Tracks progress on the initiative to increase the number of public universities developing or offering initial

teacher education programmes for the production of Foundation Phase teachers Source Data collected monitoring the Strengthening Foundation Phase Teacher Education Programme projects,

DHET PQM clearance data, DHET evaluation of qualifications database, HEMIS Method of calculation Programmes that receive PQM clearance, CHE accreditation, and recognition for employment in education

and on which students are enrolled (HEMIS); as well as institutions working towards the establishment of programmes as reported through the Strengthening Foundation Phase Teacher Education Programme, are counted.

Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by Universities Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance 20 universities involved in Foundation Phase teacher education from a baseline of 13 by 2013/14 Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: School and Pre School Teaching (formally Initial Professional Education of

Teachers)

47.

Indicator title Number of African students enrolled at universities Short definition 610 357 African students enrolled at universities by 2013/14 Purpose To track the extent of growth of African students enrolled in the system Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on a census date per academic period Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities Type Input (registered African students)

26

Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Actual headcount reported to equal or exceed projected headcount Responsibility Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate: HEMIS

48.

Indicator title A monitoring report on the Implementation of FET Lecturer Qualifications policy developed and approved by DG

Short definition A monitoring report on the Implementation of FET Lecturer Qualifications developed, and approved over the MTEF period

Purpose The policy will guide the development of university programmes for the development of quality lecturers for FET colleges, in line with the requirement for employment in the sector and need for skills in the sector. The policy will inform DHET processes regarding the approval of lecturer education programmes for employment in public TVET colleges.

Source Internal DG approved implementation report Method of calculation No calculation required Data limitation Not applicable Type Activity Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator Yes Desired performance One annual monitoring report is produced it. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Post School Teaching (formally Continuing Professional Teacher Development)

49.

Indicator title Number of universities offering programmes for FET College lecturers in line with new FET lecturer qualification policy

Short definition 10 Universities offering programmes for FET college lecturers Purpose To support Universities to introduce qualifications for FET College lecturers and to track the extent to which

universities take up the support and offer qualifications Source DHET PQM clearance database Method of calculation Number of universities that have submitted qualifications for FET College lecturers for inclusion on their

programme qualification mix Data limitation None Type Output Reporting period Annually

27

Calculation type Cumulative over the MTEF New indicator Yes Desired performance At least 5 universities have submitted applications for PQM approval to offer qualifications for FET college

lecturers by 31st March 2015: an additional 5 universities have submitted PQM approval by 31st March 2016, and 10 universities will be offering such programmes in the 2017 academic year

Responsibility Directorate: Post School Teaching (formally Continuing Professional Teacher Development)

50.

Indicator title A policy document on Adult Educator Qualifications developed and implemented. Short definition A policy document on Adult Educator Qualifications developed, and universities supported to develop

programme in line with the policy over the MTEF period Purpose A qualifications policy for adult educators will assist to professionalise this sector and will provide uniform

direction to universities on the design of such qualifications. Source Government Gazette Method of calculation No calculation required; Policy is published in the Government Gazette Data limitation Not applicable Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator Yes Desired performance A final version of the policy is gazetted by 2013/14. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Post School Teaching (formally Continuing Professional Teacher Development)

51.

Indicator title Number of female students enrolled at universities Short definition 563 509 female students enrolled at universities by 2013/14 Purpose To track the extent of growth in absolute numbers of female students enrolled in higher education

programmes across the system Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on a census date per year Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities Type Input (registered female students) Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Actual headcount reported to equal or exceed projected headcount

28

Responsibility Directorate: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate: HEMIS

52.

Indicator title Total number of students in foundation provisioning programme at universities Short definition 15 200 students in foundation provisioning programme at universities by 2013/14 Purpose Programmes offering additional teaching services to students, together with a curriculum that ensures a

strong foundation for higher education learning, extending beyond the minimum time set for the related regular university curriculum

Source Based on applications from universities Method of calculation Professional evaluation of programmes submitted. Estimated student enrolments. Funding based on

approved weighted FTE foundation programme student numbers Data limitation Indicator based on projected enrolments Type Input (estimated enrolment) Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance 15 200 students headcount enrolled Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorates:

Financial and Physical Planning and Post School Teaching (formally CPTD)

53.

Indicator title Infrastructure grants provided to universities for the improvement of different projects (in rand value) Short definition R2 billion of improved/ expanded infrastructure to improve teaching, learning, research and accommodation

facilities that will contribute to improving access over the MTEF period Purpose These grants assist universities to maintain and expand their infrastructure which contributes positively to

expand access to higher education and improve teaching, learning and living environments, and therefore , improve the quality of higher education offered across the system

Source Ministerial Statement on University Funding Method of calculation The funding in the baseline allocation to university for infrastructure over the MTEF Data limitation Dependants on amounts in the MTEF being made available by nation treasury Type Input Reporting period Annually (however allocations committed in three year cycle) Calculation type Cumulative over MTEF (3 reports) New indicator Yes Desired performance Investment provided for projects to improve infrastructure to expand access to higher education and improve

the quality of teaching, learning and living environments

29

Responsibility Directorate: Financial and Physical Planning

54.

Indicator title Number of monitoring and evaluation reports on the use of infrastructure grants to universities produced and approved by the DG

Short definition A report will be produced on the progress of infrastructure projects funded through the infrastructure grant Purpose To monitor the progress of infrastructure investments and the quality of teaching , learning and living

environments at universities Source Progress reports from universities; audited financial statements on the use of funds; oversight monitoring

reports Method of calculation Analysis of data collected and input reports provided Data limitation Dependence on information from universities Type Output (report) Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative over the MTEF New indicator Yes Desired performance 1 consolidated monitoring report on the effective3 use of infrastructure grants complied annually (3 reports

over the MTEF) Responsibility Directorate: Financial and Physical Planning

SO: 4.4.1.2 Improve success rate in higher education studies at public institutions and therefore increase graduate output by 2014

55.

Indicator title Number of monitoring and evaluation reports on the use of teaching development grants to universities produced and approved by the DG

Short definition Improved use of teaching development grants for improved teaching, learning and success at universities over the MTEF period

Purpose Teaching Development Grants , and therefore the Teaching Development Plans, are intended to support the improvement in teaching and learning at universities

Source University Teaching Development Plans (University submit plans which are evaluated, and approved by the Director-General if they comply with the DHET’s policy on the use of the teaching Development Grants), audited financial statements on the use of the funds; data collected through oversight visits when required.

Method of calculation Analysis of plans and reports Data limitation Dependent on the quality of plans and reports from universities Type Impact

30

Reporting period Plans approved once every three years: monitoring report annually Calculation type Plans non-cumulative; reports cumulative over MTEF New indicator No Desired performance 24 university 3-year Teaching Development Plans produced and approved by the Director- General by June

2014; 2 annual monitoring reports produced by September 2014 Responsibility Directorate : Post School Teaching (formally Continuing Professional Teacher Development)

56.

Indicator title % success rate of students enrolled at Public Higher Education Institutions on foundation provisioning Short definition Success rate of students enrolled at Public Higher Education Institutions on foundation provisioning to reach

80% by 2013/14 Purpose Increase the number of underprepared students entering universities through supporting them academically

via foundation provisioning programmes; and therefore increasing the likelihood that they will successfully complete an undergraduate programme

Source HEMIS together with data collected through on-going qualitative monitoring of approved programmes Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on a census date per academic period Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities Type input Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator yes Desired performance Actual headcount reported to equal or exceed projected headcount Responsibility Directorate: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate: HEMIS

57.

Indicator title % success rate of students enrolled in higher education studies at public institutions Short definition 77% success rate of students enrolled in higher education studies at public institutions by 2013/14 Purpose To track the performance of students across the system per year Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities’ student production system Method of calculation FTE degree credits divided by FTE enrolments. These calculations, for a programme or for an institution as a

whole, produce weighted average success rates for a group of courses. Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Actual academic performance reported to equal or exceed projected performance

31

Responsibility Directorate: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate: HEMIS

58.

Indicator title Number of graduates from universities Short definition 179 780 graduates from universities by 2013/14 Purpose To track the extent of growth of students receiving a qualification at universities Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on a census date per academic period Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative over the MTEF New indicator No Desired performance The number of graduates to equal or exceed projected targeted number of graduates Responsibility Directorate: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate: HEMIS

59.

Indicator title Number of graduates in Engineering Sciences from universities Short definition 11 247 graduates in Engineering Sciences from universities by 2013/14 Purpose To track the extent of growth of students receiving a qualification in Engineering at Universities Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on a census date per academic period Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance The number of graduates in Engineering to equal or exceed projected targeted number of graduates Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate:

HEMIS

60.

Indicator title Number of graduates in Human Health and Animal Health from universities Short definition 9 006 graduates in Human Health and Animal Health from universities by 2013/14 Purpose To track the extent of growth of students receiving Human Health and Animal Health qualifications at

universities Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on a census date per academic period Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities

32

Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance The number of Human health and animal health graduates to equal or exceed projected targeted number of

graduates Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate:

HEMIS

61.

Indicator title Number of graduates in Natural and Physical Sciences from universities Short definition 5 387 graduates in Natural and Physical Sciences from universities by 2013/14 Purpose To track the extent of growth of students receiving a Natural and Physical Sciences qualifications at

Universities Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on the first semester enrolment, 2nd semester enrolment and

an annual enrolment there will be 3 census dates. Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance The number of Natural and Physical Sciences graduates to equal or exceed projected targeted number of

graduates Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate:

HEMIS

62.

Indicator title Number of graduates in initial Teacher Education from universities

Short definition 10 673 graduates in initial Teacher Education from universities by 2013/14 Purpose To track the extent of growth of students receiving an initial Teacher Education qualification at universities Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on a census date per academic period Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities Type Output

33

Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance The number of Teacher educationgraduates to equal or exceed projected targeted number of Teacher

educationgraduates Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorates:

HEMIS

SO: 4.4.1.3 Monitor good governance and management of the higher education system in order to build capacity and efficiency

63.

Indicator title % of public higher education institutions with good governance and management Short definition 83% of public higher education institutions with good governance and management by 2013/14 Purpose To monitor and regularize the system and to ensure that all universities are stable and managed effectively

and efficiently Source Annual reports of the Universities reporting on governance and management aspects as required by the

Regulations for Reporting by HEI, Higher education Act, 1997; progress reports from institutions under administration; monitoring reports on institutions produced on an on-going basis.

Method of calculation Analysis of reports and professional assessment of the state of governance and management of institutions against predetermined criteria

Data limitation Quality of reports and quantity of inputs Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator Yes Desired performance Universities to meet set criteria and efficiency targets as approved by the Minister and no institutions under

administration or exhibiting problems requiring independent assessments

Responsibility Sub Programme Manager : Management Support

64.

Indicator title % of registered Private Higher Education Institutions compliant with the regulatory criteria Short definition 100 % of registered PHEIs compliant with the regulatory criteria by 2013/14 Purpose To ensure that all registered institutions comply with the set policies and operate according to law. Source Conditions of registration and annual reports submitted by institutions to the Department.

34

Method of calculation Monitoring of conditions set for registration of individual institutions and annual reports. Data limitation No established database system and the annual reports are of poor quality Type Records and reports Reporting period Annually Calculation type Analysis New indicator None Desired performance Good database system to assist with the monitoring of compliance Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Private Higher Education Institutions

65.

Indicator title % of Statutes of universities reviewed and published in Government Gazette Short definition 100% of statutes of universities reviewed and published in government gazette by 2013/14 Purpose To publish a revised Research Output Policy, which provides the criteria for what counts as research outputs

that will be subsidised, on how these will be measured Source Review of the Research outputs from the system Method of calculation Government Gazette Data limitation Nope Type Output Reporting period Once-off Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Policy is approved by the Minister and made available to the public Responsibility Directorate: University Policy and Development Support

66.

Indicator title Number of universities with five Ministerial council appointees appointed Short definition 24 universities with five Ministerial council appointees appointed by 2013/14 Purpose To ensure that councils are adequately equipped with people who have requisite skills for the effective and

efficient governance of universities Source Departmental database of potential Ministerial Council members and database of terms of office of

appointed Ministerial Council members Method of calculation Councils without Vacancies for Ministerial appointees Data limitation N/A Type Input Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No

35

Desired performance All Councils fully functioning with five Ministerial appointees each Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: University Support and Sector Liaison

67.

Indicator title Number of governance training workshops for ministerial appointees Short definition 1 Governance training workshops for ministerial appointees annually Purpose To equip Ministerial Council appointees with requisite skills to ensure that they understand their role and are

effective in contributing to the good governance of the institution to which they are appointed Source Criteria for good governance; appropriate expertise in university governance Method of calculation Hosting of a training workshop Data limitation None Type Input Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative; qualitative New indicator No Desired performance Ministerial Council Members fully engaged and skilled to ensure they are effective in implementing good

governance at their respective institutions Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: University Support and Sector Liaison

SO: 4.4.1.4 To develop and enhance the research capacity and productivity of universities by 2014

68.

Indicator title Number of postgraduate graduates Short definition 47 617 postgraduate graduates by 2013/14 Purpose To track the extent of growth of students receiving post graduate qualifications (honours’, masters’ and

doctorate qualifications) Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities’ student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on a census date per academic period Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative over the MTEF New indicator No Desired performance The number of students receiving a post graduate qualification to equal or exceed projected targeted number

of post graduates in institutions’ enrolment plans Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate:

36

HEMIS

69.

Indicator title Number of Honours graduates Short definition 24 019 Honours graduates by 2013/14 Purpose To track the extent of growth of students receiving honours’ qualifications Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities’ student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on a census date per academic period Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance The number of students receiving a honours qualification to equal or exceed projected targeted number in

institutions’ enrolment plans Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate:

HEMIS

70.

Indicator title Number of Research Masters graduates Short definition 5 287 Research Masters graduate by 2013/14 Purpose To track the extent of growth of students graduating with a Master’s degree Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on a census date per academic period Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by Universities Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance The number of student receiving a Master’s degree qualification to equal or exceed projected targeted

number in the enrolment plan Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate:

HEMIS

71.

Indicator title Number of doctoral graduates Short definition 1 941 doctoral graduates by 2013/14

Purpose To track the extent of growth of students graduating with a Doctoral degree

37

Source Audited Institutional HEMIS sub data set from Universities student production system Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities on a census date per academic period Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by Universities Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative over the MTEF New indicator No Desired performance The number of student receiving a Doctoral degree qualification to equal or exceed projected targeted

number in the enrolment plan Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Academic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, supported by the Directorate:

HEMIS

72.

Indicator title Number of publication units Short definition 11 603 publication units by 2013/14 Purpose To measures the growth in the number of approved research publications across the system, which also

indicates institutional research capacity, and therefore tracks the extent of the contribution of institutions towards the production of new knowledge

Source Submissions by each University on institutional research outputs and the professional assessment of these by the Research Outputs Panel to generate a data base of assessed research publications which includes: approved peer reviewed scholarly books; papers in accredited journals; and papers in approved peer reviewed published conference proceedings.

Method of calculation The sum of the number research output units produced as calculated from the database of approved publications. Units are allocated per publication based on the author proportion at each institution. A single authored accredited journal article earns 1 unit, an approved conference paper 0.5 units and an approved scholarly book up to 5 units depending on its length.

Data limitation Accuracy of the assessment process and reliable provision of data by Universities Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance An increase in the number and quality of publications produced by researchers at Universities Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: University Policy and Development Support

73. Indicator title Ratio of research output units per instructional/ research staff Short definition Ratio of research output units per instructional/ research staff to reach 1.36 by 2013/14

38

Purpose To measure the research productivity of each institution through a per capita ratio, in order to effectively compare growth in research capacity across the system

Source Database of approved research publication outputs per institution; audited HEMIS data on instructional/ research staff per institution; and audited HEMIS data on masters’ and doctoral graduates per institution

Method of calculation The number of weighted research outputs units divided by the number of permanent instructional / research staff

Data limitation Accuracy of data depends upon the reliable provision of data by the Universities and the accuracy of the database of approved research publications

Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non accumulative New indicator No Desired performance Increase in the production and quality of research publications and post graduates per academic staff Responsibility Sub Programme Manager : University Policy and Development Support, supported by Directorate: HEMIS

SO: 4.4.1.5 To maintain and enhance the Higher education Management Information System (HEMIS)

74.

Indicator title Number of updates on the HEMIS for audited student and staff data Short definition 2 updates on the HEMIS one for audited student data and one for staff data annually Purpose To provide reliable and accurate data for the funding, planning and monitoring of the University sector in

relation to their infrastructure Source Validated database of a subset of data on students and staff extracted from the Universities’ HEMIS systems Method of calculation Unit record datasets (one for students and one for staff) extracted by Universities as at the 31st December and

audited by the 31st July. Data limitation The accuracy of the data depends upon the timeous and reliable provision of data by Universities. Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance A reliable dataset for monitoring and analysing the capacity of the University sector for ensuring stability,

sustainability and future planning purposes. Responsibility Directorate: HEMIS

39

75.

Indicator title Number of updates on the HEMIS system for final building space data from the Universities Short definition 1 update on the HEMIS system for final building space data from the 24 Universities annually Purpose To provide reliable and accurate data for the planning and monitoring of the capacity of the University sector

to produce their infrastructure Source Validated database of a subset of data from the Universities’ building space production systems Method of calculation Unit record dataset extracted by Universities as at the 31st December Data limitation The accuracy of the data depends upon the timeous and reliable provision of data by the Universities. Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance A reliable dataset for monitoring the capacity of the University sector and for future infrastructure planning. Responsibility Directorate: HEMIS

4.5 PROGRAMME 4: VOCATIONAL AND CONTINUING EDUCATION

SO: 4.5.1.1 Increase access to and improve success in programmes leading to intermediate and high-level learning by 2014

76.

Indicator title Number of learners enrolled in AET Centres Short definition 287 000 learners enrolled in AET Centres by 2013/14 Purpose Minister’s Delivery Agreement has targets that are to be achieved by 2014. In line with section 35 of the

Adult Education and Training Act, 2000, centres have a duty to provide information. Source Snap survey and Annual EMIS Survey Method of calculation Number of learners disaggregated according to level of education, race, gender, age. Data limitation The data is gathered as per survey date and therefore does not address attendance and progression. Type Survey report Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Actual enrolment to meet or exceed target Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr EB Mahlobo

40

Indicator title Number of headcount enrolments in public FET colleges Short definition 650 000 headcount enrolments in FET Colleges by 2013/14 Purpose To track expansion of access to FET Colleges Source Annual Survey Method of calculation Use the headcount in all qualifications and programmes offered in FET Colleges. Data limitation Subject to accuracy of Survey data Type Inputs Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Actual enrolment target Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Ms T Futshane

77.

Indicator title Number of FET college students awarded bursaries Short definition 222 817 FET College students awarded bursaries by 2013/14 Purpose To determine the degree to which government is able to ensure that financial need does not constitute a

barrier to FET college opportunities Source National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) report Method of calculation 100% of the eligible students are covered Data limitation None Type Input Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Cumulative New indicator Continuing Desired performance The target is to be able to match the affordability with the high demand for financial aid Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr EB Mahlobo

78.

Indicator title Revised NC(V) qualification policy Short definition New 1x3 Revised NC(V) qualification policy by 2013/14 Purpose To ensure that the NC(V) qualification is responsive to the needs of the intended cohorts of students,

supports skills developments and enables efficient implementation in TVET colleges Source NC(V) qualifications policy Method of calculation Not applicable Data limitation Accuracy in pass and throughput rates of enrolled students since 2007 Type Input and output examinations data

41

Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Revised qualification policy for the NC(V) published Responsibility Sub-programme Manager: Ms G Magnus

79.

Indicator title National Senior Certificate for Adults (NASCA) developed and approved by the DG Short definition 4 350 AET Educators and FET College lecturers trained on the GETC and the NASCA Purpose To develop an alternative qualification for youths and adults at NQF level 4 Source GENFETQF Method of calculation Not applicable. The indicator does not need to be calculated Data limitation None Type Input and activity Reporting period Once on in 2012 Calculation type No calculation is required New indicator Yes Desired performance Existence of the NASCA Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr EB Mahlobo

80.

Indicator title Number of AET Educators and FET College lecturers trained for the NASCA and the GETC Short definition 3 600 adults enrolled for NASCA by 2014 Purpose To measure the number of post-school opportunities availed to the youths and adults with a view of raising

the base and to reduce the NEETS. Source Survey reports Method of calculation Headcount enrolment into the qualification per province Data limitation Subject to accuracy of survey data Type Input Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator Yes Desired performance High enrolment Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr EB Mahlobo

81. Indicator title Amended National Certificate (Orientation) developed and approved by the DG Short definition Amended National Certificate (Orientation) developed and approved Purpose To serve as a bridging programme for learners without the requisite level of literacies and numeracies but

42

who wish to access the learning opportunities provided by TVET colleges Source Submission approved by the DG Method of calculation Availability of a submission approved by the DG for implementation Data limitation None Type Input Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator Yes Desired performance New qualification at NQF level 2 Responsibility Sub Programme Manager MsA Singh

82.

Indicator title Higher Certificate (Foundation) developed and approved by the DG Short definition Higher Certificate (Foundation) offered in TVET colleges in partnership with HEIs Purpose To enable students wishing to pursue higher education studies an opportunity to improve their

competencies in Science, Language and Mathematics in the TVET college sub-system Source NQF Method of calculation Availability of an approved Higher Certificate (Foundation) developed Data limitation No data limitation Type Input Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator Yes Desired performance HC (Foundation) developed and registered by HEIs and offered in TVET colleges Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr MMA Maharaswa and Dr D Parker

83.

Indicator title Amended National Senior Certificate for adults out of school youth developed and approved by the DG Short definition An amended National Senior Certificate for adults and out of school youth developed and approved by the

DG for implementation Purpose To measure the availability of a National Senior Certificate to cater for adults and out of school youth Source DG approved NSC Method of calculation Availability of an approved amended NSC Data limitation No limitation Type Input Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative

43

New indicator Yes Desired performance An amended National Senior Certificate for adults and out of school youth developed and approved by the

DG for implementation Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr MMA Maharaswa

84.

Indicator title NASCA related policies and regulations developed and approved by the DG Short definition NASCA policies and regulations approved by the DG Purpose To measure the availability of approved NASCA policies and regulations Source DG Approved submission with policies and regulations Method of calculation Availability of approved policies and regulations Data limitation No limitations Type Input Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator Yes Desired performance NASCA policies and regulations approved by the DG Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr MMA Maharaswa

85.

Indicator title Number of colleges offering NQF level 5 to 6 programmes Short definition A total of 10 colleges supported to offer NQF level 5 to 6 programmes by 2013/14 Purpose To determine the degree to which the State is able to expand access to university education programmes

through FET college Source Minister’s Gazette under section 43 Method of calculation As per the Gazette. Data limitation None Type Activity and efficiency Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Actual performance higher than targeted is desired. Partnerships between colleges and universities are

encouraged due to increase access and articulation possibilities. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr EB Mahlobo

86. Indicator title Certification rates in the VET qualifications Short definition Percentage certification in the following VET qualifications:

GETC:40%

44

NC(V) L2:50% NC(V) L3:50% NC(V) L4:52% N1 –N3:43% N4- N6:48% NASCA :52% By the 2013/14

Purpose To show the performance and efficiency (value for money) of the VCET system Source Examination Report Method of calculation Number of candidates who sat for the exams divided by the number of students who certificated Data limitation Subject to SITA data Type Efficiency Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance 50% by 2014 Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr EB Mahlobo

87.

Indicator title Pass rate in Maths: NC(V) L2,NC(V) L3 and NC(V) L4 and Maths literacy: NC(V) L2,NC(V) L3 and NC(V) L4 Short definition Pass rate in Maths and Maths literacy:

Maths: NC(V) L2:48% NC(V) L3:44% NC(V) L4:55% Maths literacy: NC(V) L2:70% NC(V) L3:80% NC(V) L4:85% By 2013/14

Purpose To measure the impact of the academic support service focusing on these subjects to improve overall certification rates.

Source Examination Report Method of calculation Number of candidates who passed each subject divided by the number of candidates who sat for exams in

the respective subjects

45

Data limitation Subject to SITA data Type Impact Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator Continuous Desired performance 50% by 2014 Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr EB Mahlobo

88.

Indicator title Certification rates of Bursary recipients : NC(V) L2,NC(V) L3 NC(V) L4,N1-N3 and N4-N6 Short definition Certification rates of Bursary recipients :

NC(V) L2:44% NC(V) L3:46% NC(V) L4:47% N1-N3:45% N4-N6:45%

Purpose To determine governments return on investment by the FET College sector Source NSFAS Report Method of calculation Number of students who were awarded bursaries and obtained certification divided by the total number of

bursary beneficiaries per year. Data limitation Subject to NSFAS report accuracy Type Efficiency Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator Continuous Desired performance Gradual improvement in the certification rates of bursary recipients across all levels. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr EB Mahlobo

89.

Indicator title Number of reports on coordination of the following donor-funded projects: Business Management Standards, Qualifications, review, NC (V) selected subjects review and Student Support Services interventions to selected FET colleges through donor funding

Short definition 2 half yearly of reports on coordination of the following donor-funded projects: Business Management Standards, Qualifications, review, NC (V) selected subjects review and Student Support Services interventions implemented to selected FET colleges compiled annually

Purpose To account for the use of donor-funding

46

Source PSKD, NICHE and SESDIII implementation report Method of calculation No calculation required Data limitation No data Type Input Reporting period Bi-annually Calculation type No need for calculation New indicator No. Always depends on the availability of the donor funds Desired performance Clear and detailed account on how donor funding is utilized to strengthen different aspects of the FET

College sector Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr EB Mahlobo

90.

Indicator title Number of lecturers, Student Support Services (SSS) managers and PDE / Regional officials that are trained to implement the comprehensive student support services framework

Short definition 130 lecturers, Student Support Services (SSS) managers and PDE / Regional officials that are trained to implement the comprehensive student support services framework by 2013/14

Purpose To show the degree of investment in building the capacity for effective coordination and implementation of the SSS Framework in the FET Colleges

Source Attendance registers collected by the DHET during the training Method of calculation Number of delegates who attend the training sessions according to attendance registers Data limitation NONE Type Input Reporting period Bi-annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator Continuous Desired performance To reach SSS officers of all the campuses is desired. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr EB Mahlobo

91.

Indicator title Number of trained lecturers to support curriculum delivery Short definition 600 of trained lecturers, to support new and revised curriculum delivery in FET Colleges by 2013/14 Purpose To show the degree of investment in building the capacity of college lecturers in subject content and

teaching abilities Source Lecturer training reports with attendance registers Method of calculation The number of lecturers who attend various training sessions as per registers Data limitation None Type Input

47

Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Cumulative – for the year New indicator No Desired performance Higher than targeted numbers is desirable. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr EB Mahlobo

92.

Indicator title Number of trained provincial (PED) officials to support the new NASCA and GETC curriculum delivery Short definition 60 PED officials trained to support curriculum delivery by 2013/14 Purpose To show the degree of investment in building the capacity for PEDs to support curriculum delivery in AET

institutions Source PED training reports with attendance registers Method of calculation The number of PED officials who attend various training sessions

Data limitation Subject to accuracy of training reports and attendance registers

Type Input Reporting period Bi-Annually Calculation type Cumulative – for the year New indicator No Desired performance Building the capacity of all PED officials to support AET curriculum delivery is the desired performance.

Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr EB Mahlobo

SO: 4.5.1.2 Strengthen the institutional capacity of VET institutions to improve their performance and efficiency

93.

Indicator title Number of personnel trained in VCET institutions trained to support curriculum delivery in AET and colleges Short definition 130 of personnel in VET institutions trained support curriculum delivery in AET and colleges by 2013/14 Purpose To show the degree of investment in building the capacity for financial management skills, as colleges have

to manage large amounts of public funds Source Training session reports and attendance registers Method of calculation Number of personnel who have been trained financial management Data limitation Double training, some colleges send same people to similar types of training, resulting in double counting Type Activity-input

48

Reporting period Bi-annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance All College have financial management capacity to manage public funds Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Ms T Futshane

94.

Indicator title Number of college councils trained in institutional and corporate governance Short definition 50 of college councils trained in institutional and corporate governance annually Purpose To indicate the number of colleges with a potential for governance stability Source College annual report and Gazette notices Method of calculation No calculation is required. Data limitation None Type Activity and Input Reporting period Annually Calculation type None New indicator New Desired performance Must be in all 50 colleges Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Ms T Futshane

95.

Indicator title Number of personnel at public FET Colleges trained in financial management Short definition 184 personnel at public FET Colleges trained in financial management Purpose To ensure that there is a Human Resource management and Planning framework for the FET colleges that

regulate, inter alia, staff provisioning Source Report Method of calculation No calculation required Data limitation Not applicable Type Input- activity Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Once only for 2012 New indicator No Desired performance Adequate staff provisioning, Improved HR Management, Labour Relations and increased throughput rate Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Ms T Futshane

96. Indicator title Number of public institutions to be declared as community colleges in the next financial year Short definition 9 Public institutions to be declared as community colleges in the next financial year Purpose To show the degree of investment in building the capacity for financial management skills, as colleges have

49

to manage large amounts of public funds Source Training session reports and attendance registers Method of calculation Number of personnel who have been trained financial management Data limitation Double training, some colleges send same people to similar types of training, resulting in double counting Type Activity-input Reporting period Cumulative Calculation type Bi-annually New indicator No Desired performance All College have financial management capacity to manage public funds Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Ms T Futshane

97.

Indicator title Number of new Public FET College campuses built and completed Short definition 6 new FET Colleges campuses built and completed by 2013/14 Purpose To measure the number of new FET colleges built Source Signed off building completion certifcates Method of calculation Availability of Signed off building completion certificates versus physical visibility of building Data limitation No limitation Type Output Reporting period Annual Calculation type Annual New indicator Yes Desired performance 12 new FET Colleges campuses built and completed by 2013/14 Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr MMA Maharaswa

98.

Indicator title Number of personnel at public FET Colleges trained in Strategic and Operational planning Short definition 300 personnel at public FET Colleges trained in strategic and operational planning by 2013/14 Purpose To show the degree of investment in building the capacity of personnel at Public FET Colleges trained in

Strategic and Operational planning Source Personnel training report with attendance registers Method of calculation Number of delegates who attend the training sessions as per registers Data limitation None Type input Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No

50

Desired performance To reach all personnel than targeted numbers Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr MMA Maharaswa

99.

Indicator title Number of fully constituted college councils Short definition 30 fully constituted college councils by 2013/14 Purpose To indicate the number of colleges with a potential for governance stability Source College annual report and Gazette notices Method of calculation No calculation is required. Data limitation None Type Activity and Input Reporting period Annually Calculation type None New indicator No Desired performance Must be in all 50 colleges Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Ms T Futshane

100.

Indicator title Human Resource Management and Planning (HRM&P) framework for FET Colleges developed and approved by the DG for implementation

Short definition 9 FET Colleges implement the Human Resource Management and Planning (HRM&P) framework for FET Colleges by 2013/14

Purpose To ensure that there is a Human Resource management and Planning framework for the FET colleges that regulate, inter alia, staff provisioning

Source Report Method of calculation No calculation required Data limitation Not applicable Type Input- activity Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Once only for 2012 New indicator No Desired performance Adequate staff provisioning, Improved HR Management, Labour Relations and increased throughput rate Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Ms T Futshane

101.

Indicator title Percentage of AET Centres with improved conditions of Service for educators Short definition 100% (all) Improved conditions of services for AET Educators implemented in all AET centres by 2013/14 Purpose To measure the number of AET Centres with improved conditions of Service for educators in percentage

form

51

Source Report on AET Centres with improved conditions of Service for educators in percentage form Method of calculation Availability of report Data limitation No limitation Type Input Reporting period Annual Calculation type Annual New indicator No Desired performance 100% Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr MMA Maharaswa

102.

Indicator title Number of provinces where training and assessment of the implementation of the Collective Agreement is conducted

Short definition Training and assessment of the implementation of the Collective Agreement is conducted in 9 provinces Purpose To measure training and assessment conducted in provinces for the implementation of the Collective

Agreement Source List of trainees who physically attended training Method of calculation Total number of provinces where training and assessment was conducted as confirmed by the list signed by

individual trainees Data limitation If attendance register is not administered information reported may be incorrect Type Output Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance 9 provinces receive training and assessment on the implementation of the Collective Agreement Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr MMA Maharaswa

103.

Indicator title % of public FET College functions transferred to the DHET Short definition 100% (All) of public FET College functions transferred to the DHET by 2013/14 Purpose To measure FET college functions that were transferred to DHET Source Funding allocation as per National Treasury confirmation Method of calculation Funding allocation as per National Treasury confirmation Data limitation No limitation Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative

52

New indicator No Desired performance 100%

Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr MMA Maharaswa

SO: 4.5.1.3 Manage and administer a credible and efficient examinations and assessment system for VET institutions

104.

Indicator title An efficient registration, resulting, and certification system per examination cycle Short definition 100% of efficient registration, resulting, and certification system annually Purpose To measure success in registration, resulting, and certification within colleges Source Examination report Method of calculation Number of colleges that administered registrations, examination and certification successfully without any

fraud and other challenge Data limitation No limitation Type Output Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance 100% Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: D MMA Maharaswa

105.

Indicator title % of FET Colleges conducting improved assessments Short definition 100% (50) FET Colleges conduct improved assessments annually Purpose To measure the number of Colleges that conduct improved assessments annually Source Assessment report Method of calculation Total number colleges that conduct improved assessments over total number of colleges *100 Data limitation No data limitation Type Output Reporting period Bi-Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No

53

Desired performance 100% Responsibility Branch Head: Dr MMA Maharaswa

106.

Indicator title % of AET Centres conducting improved assessments Short definition 100% (1 540) AET Centres s conduct improved assessments annually by 2013/14 Purpose To measure the number of AET centres that conduct improved assessments annually Source Assessment report Method of calculation Total number centres that conduct improved assessments over total number of colleges *100 Data limitation No data limitation Type Output Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance 100% Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr MMA Maharaswa

107.

Indicator title A national examination report compiled and approved by the Minister Short definition A national examination report compiled and approved by the Minister annually by 2013/14 Purpose To assess national examinations conducted in colleges

Source Minister approved report Method of calculation Approved report Data limitation No limitation Type Input Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Report approved by the Minister Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Dr MMA Maharaswa

SO: 4.5.1.4 Provide support for the implementation of a monitoring, evaluation and research for the improvement of the vocational education and training system

108. Indicator title Business Management System standard set for Public FET Colleges and approved by the DG Short definition 50 public FET Colleges implement Business Management System (BMS) standards by 2014/15

54

Purpose To ensure an acceptable level of data quality Source Annual and snap surveys Method of calculation Headcount enrolment on all programmes per college, per province. Data limitation Not all colleges are able to convert fully to the required standard in one year Type Input Reporting period Annually Calculation type N/A New indicator No Desired performance All college implement the required data standard Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Ms T Futshane

109.

Indicator title Number of AET centres responding to an annual survey conducted by DHET Short definition 3 083 AET Centres responding to an annual survey conducted by DHET annually over the MTEF period Purpose To collect data in the whole sector per centre Source Annual and Snap survey Method of calculation N/A Data limitation The accuracy of the data depends on the reliability of the class registers kept at the centre as well as the

accuracy of the capturing of the data at the centre Type Output Reporting period Bi-Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator No Desired performance To monitor the return rate of completed survey forms from each centre in the country Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Ms T Futshane

110.

Indicator title Number of public FET Colleges responding to an annual survey conducted by DHET Short definition 50 Public FET Colleges responding to an annual survey conducted by DHET over the MTEF period Purpose To collect data in the whole sector Source Annual survey and weekly enrolment monitoring Method of calculation The surveys gets distributed to each college and reported to National Data limitation The accuracy of the data depends on the reliability of the class registers kept at the college as well as the

accuracy of the capturing of the data at the college Type Output Reporting period Bi-Annually Calculation type Cumulative

55

New indicator No Desired performance To monitor the return rate of completed survey forms from each college in the country Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Ms T Futshane

111.

Indicator title % of private FET Colleges responding to an annual conducted by DHET Short definition 100% (All) of private FET Colleges responding to an annual survey conducted by DHET Purpose To collect and make data available on private FET colleges as part of the FET sector and to understand the

size and shape of private FET college sub-sector in South Africa Source Annual Survey The annual survey is distributed to each registered private college to complete and return

to the DHET for analysis Method of calculation No specific method. Report entails tables, percentages and graphs based on the analysis of data collected Data limitation Data accuracy and completeness depend on the ability of respondents to navigate the annual survey Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance All (100%) registered private FET colleges to respond to annual survey Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Ms T Futshane

112.

Indicator title A report on the Implementation of a Public FET College Model developed and approved by the DG Short definition A model for public FET Colleges expansion developed and implementation monitored Purpose To ensure efficient and effective expansion Source Colleges Method of calculation Calculation of M2/FTE per timetable programme Data limitation Colleges not calculating their floor space correctly Type Efficiency Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-accumulative New indicator new Desired performance Colleges to show in excess of 40% improvement Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Ms T Futshane

113.

Indicator title % of registered private colleges complying with all applicable regulations Short definition 100% (All) private colleges monitored for compliance and performance Purpose To ensure that registered private colleges continue to comply with the requirements for maintenance of

their registration and perform at an acceptable and comparable level with public FET colleges

56

Source Annual reports as provided by Regulation 18 of the Regulations for the Registration of Private FET Colleges, 2007. The annual reports are to be submitted by each registered college to the DHET, together with documentary proof/evidence of compliance with the requirements for maintenance of registration (Accreditation report, OHS report, Audited annual financial statements, etc.)

Method of calculation No specific method. Report entails tables, percentages and graphs based on the analysis of data collected Data limitation None Data veracity is verifiable by contacting the agencies that issue the required documentary proof

submitted by private colleges. Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance All (100%) registered private colleges to submit annual reports with the required documentary

proof/evidence. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: Ms T Futshane

4.6 PROGRAMME 5: SKILLS DEVELOPMENT

SO: 4.6.1.1 Provide a dynamic interface between the workplace and learning institutions and to promote quality learning at work and for work by 2016

114.

Indicator title The number of artisan learners registered nationally Short definition 26 000 Artisan learners entering learning by 2013/14 Purpose Records number of new and/or RPL artisan learners entering artisan learning programmes annually in

support of economic growth Source SETAs and INDLELA coordinated by National Artisan Development Support Centre Method of calculation Number reported by SETAs and INDLELA Data limitation No reports or late or inaccurate reports received Type Measures Inputs Reporting period Quarterly

Calculation type Cumulative

57

New indicator On-going from previous years Desired performance Achieve or exceed cumulative monthly SETA & INDLELA targets Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: INDLELA

115.

Indicator title Number of artisan candidates found competent nationally Short definition 12 000 artisan candidates found competent nationally by 2013/14 Purpose Records number of persons becoming qualified artisans in support of economic growth Source Monthly reports from SETAs, INDLELA and other relevant role players Method of calculation Number reported by SETAs, INDLELA and other relevant role players. Data limitation No reports or late or inaccurate reports received Type Measures Outputs Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Cumulative that is compared against annual target New indicator On-going from previous years Desired performance Performance must be at target level or more. Responsibility Sub Programme manager: INDLELA

116.

Indicator title Number of graduates receiving Work Intergraded Learning (WIL) Short definition 27 279 graduates receiving Work Integrated Learning (WIL) by 2013/14 Purpose Records numbers of learners entering workplaces to complete or complement their learning programmes

to enhance their employability Source Reports from SETAs, FET Colleges and Universities Method of calculation Reports from SETAs, FET Colleges and Universities Data limitation No reports or late or inaccurate reports received Type Measures Outcomes Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative that is compared against annual target New indicator New Desired performance Performance must be at target level or more. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager : WIL

117.

Indicator title Percentage of national artisan learners pass trade test Short definition 48 % of national artisan learners pass trade test by 2013/14 Purpose Records number of persons passing a national trade test in support of improved artisan training and

testing. Source INDLELA Trade Test Centre and MerSETA

58

Method of calculation Number reported by INDLELA and MerSETA Data limitation No reports or late or inaccurate reports received Type Measures Outputs Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Cumulative New indicator On-going from previous years Desired performance Achieve or exceed quarterly targets Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: INDLELA

118.

Indicator title Secure trade testing system developed and implemented at all accredited trade test centres Short definition System for management of trade test tasks implemented at all test centres Purpose National single secure system utilized to ensure same standard utilized nationally to remove any

irregularities from system. Source National Artisan Moderation Body Method of calculation System operational in planning or development or in pilot phase or operational Data limitation Lack of trade tests for specific artisan trades Type Measures inputs, processes and outputs Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator New Desired performance Progressively achieving operational status Responsibility Sub Programme Manager:INDLELA

119.

Indicator title Number of audits conducted at SETA or QCTO accredited trade test centres Short definition The number of audits conducted at SETA or QCTO accredited trade test centres increasing to 30 by

2013/14 Purpose Records number of audits at SETA or QCTO accredited trade test centres in support of improved quality of

artisan development Source National Artisan Moderation Body Method of calculation Number reported by National Artisan Moderation Body Data limitation No audits conducted Type Measures Outputs Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Cumulative New indicator On-going from previous years

59

Desired performance Achieve or exceed quarterly target Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: INDLELA

120.

Indicator title Scarce and Critical Skills List compiled, approved by the Director-General and published Short definition List of Top 100 occupations in demand has been compiled and approved by the DG Purpose To identify occupations that are in high demand with a view to informing skills planning, resource

allocation, enrolment planning, qualifications and curriculum development, working permits issued by Home Affairs and career advice to young people

Source Sources include: SETA Sector Skills Plans; SETA Priority Skills lists; the vacancy index produced by the Department of Labour; research on wage analyses; scarce occupations identified through the SIPS process; Existing research on skills needs; interviews with key stakeholders and benchmarking with an advisory committee

Method of calculation Occupations were identified, weighted and ranked Data limitation The methodology relies on secondary data sources Type Process indicator Reporting period Annual Calculation type Non-Cumulative New indicator New Desired performance To be determined Responsibility Sub Programme Manager:INDLELA

121.

Indicator title Number of SETAs with partnerships agreements, Public FET Colleges and Universities Short definition 21 Strategic Plans of all SETAs analysed and approved in relation to the Sector Skills Plans annually by

2013/14 Purpose To align SETA Plans and Funding to the Government wide Strategy and to Sector demands with the Post

schools system of FET Colleges and Universities Source SETAs submit Sector Skills Plans to the Department as an annexure to the Strategic Plan. Method of calculation The alignment of Sector Skills Plan in reflecting the labour market demand for skills and the alignment to

Government priorities. Data limitation Lack of quality data and analysis to indicate demand Type Outcomes and impact Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator New Desired performance Sector Skills Plans that are responsive to the economic growth needs of the Country and the Labour

60

Market. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: SETA Support and Learnership

122.

Indicator title % of SETAs implementing NSDS III with approved service level agreement Short definition 100% (21) SETAs implementing NSDS III with approved service level agreement annually by 2013/14 Purpose To improve the effectiveness and efficiency of skills development and promote sustainable employment Source NSDS III reports submitted by SETAs Method of calculation Quarterly reports submitted by SETAs Data limitation Lack of reporting system for SETA data to the Department Type Impact, efficiency, economy, equity and outcomes Reporting period Non-Cumulative Calculation type Quarterly New indicator New Desired performance SETAs to implement and achieve the set targets as indicated and agreed upon in the SSP and Strategic

Plans Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: SETA Performance

123.

SO: 4.6.1.2 Promote the alignment of skills development outputs to the needs of the workplace and to the broader growth needs of the country’s economy Indicator title Number of SETAs’ Strategic Plans analysed and approved by the Minister (in relation to the Sector Skills Plans) Short definition 21 Strategic Plans of all SETAs analysed and approved in relation to the Sector Skills Plans annually by 2013/14 Purpose To align SETA Plans and Funding to the Government wide Strategy and to Sector demands with the Post schools

system of FET Colleges and Universities Source SETAs submit Sector Skills Plans to the Department as an annexure to the Strategic Plan. Method of calculation The alignment of Sector Skills Plan in reflecting the labour market demand for skills and the alignment to

Government priorities. Data limitation Lack of quality data and analysis to indicate demand Type Outcomes and impact Reporting period Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator New Desired performance Sector Skills Plans that are responsive to the economic growth needs of the Country and the Labour Market. Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: SETA Support and Learnership

61

124.

Indicator title Number of SETA Fora held to improve communication (Department and SETA's) Short definition 4 SETAs For a to enter into at least 8 partnership agreements with Public FET Colleges and Universities by outer

year Purpose All SETAs to enter into at least 8 partnership agreements with Public FET Colleges and Universities by outer year Source SETA Coordination Method of calculation Number of Meetings held Data limitation None Type Input and Impact Reporting period Bi-Annually Calculation type Cumulative New indicator New Desired performance To ensure alignment and achievement of the Skills Development Objectives Responsibility Sub Programme Manager : SETA Coordination

125.

Indicator title % of SETAs implementing NSDS III with approved service level agreement Short definition 100% (21) SETAs implementing NSDS III with approved service level agreement annually Purpose To improve the effectiveness and efficiency of skills development and promote sustainable employment Source NSDS III reports submitted by SETAs Method of calculation Quarterly reports submitted by SETAs Data limitation Lack of reporting system for SETA data to the Department Type Impact, efficiency, economy, equity and outcomes Reporting period Quarterly Calculation type Non-Cumulative New indicator New Desired performance SETAs to implement and achieve the set targets as indicated and agreed upon in the SSP and Strategic Plans Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: SETA Performance

126.

Indicator title Number of annual NSDS review reports approved by the Director-General Short definition 1 NSDS review report produced annually Purpose To track progress on the implementation of NSDS 11 targets Source SETA Coordination, NSF, VCET, Universities Branches and INDLELA/NAMB reports Method of calculation Simple count. Each implementing agent submits report against set NSDS objectives Data limitation No independent method of verifying veracity of submitted reports

62

Type Output Reporting period Annually Calculation type Non-cumulative New indicator No Desired performance Report with verified content Responsibility Sub Programme Manager: SETA Coordination