tax authorities going digital - house of entrepreneurship · 2017-05-08 · tax authorities going...
TRANSCRIPT
The better the question. The better the answer�.The better the world works.
Tax Authorities Going Digital05 May 2017
Page 2
Agenda
► Digitalization of Tax Audit
► Preparation for a FAIA based audit
► VAT implications
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 3
Digitalization of Tax Audit
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 4
Digitalization of tax audit
► Clear trend towards digitalization worldwide:
► e-filing considerably eases processing of VAT returns for taxadministrations and makes administration faster and moreefficient;
► having electronic data enables tax administrations to use IT-basedaudit tools more easily, which can help to combat fraud andevasion;
► most taxpayers can also benefit from increased efficiencies arisingfrom e-filing and tax administrations’ increased audit capacities
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 5
Digital tax administration life cycle
Level 1 Level 2
Para
digm
shift
Level 3 Level 4
Dis
rupt
ive
Level 5
“E-file” “E-accounting”
“E-match” “E-audit” “E-assess”
Use ofstandardizedelectronic formfor filing taxreturns requiredor optional;other incomedata (e.g.,payroll, financial)filed electronicallyand matchedannually
Submitaccounting orother source datato support filings(e.g., invoices,trial balances) ina definedelectronic formatto a definedtimetable;frequent additionsand changes atthis level
Submit additionalaccounting andsource data;governmentaccessesadditional data(bankstatements),begins to matchdata across taxtypes andpotentially acrosstaxpayers andjurisdictions inreal time
L2 data analyzedby governmententities andcross-checked tofilings in real-timeto map thegeographiceconomicecosystem;taxpayersreceivingelectronic auditassessments withlimited time torespond
Governmententities usingsubmitted data toassess taxwithout the needfor tax forms;taxpayersallowed a limitedtime to auditgovernment-calculated tax
Note: Not all governments collect the same information or treat it the same under this model. Further, the move to digitization is notnecessarily linear.
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 6
Digital Tax Administration for CertainCountries
Brazil
China
Mexico
USA
UK
Australia
Mexican Tax Authorities haveadvanced digital requirementsenabling it to carryout E-audits
US tax authorities have targeted taxrequirements around certain filing types
UK is undergoing a major initiative to maketax digital by 2020 whereby a need for taxreturns might be eliminated
Brazil has detailed digital taxrequirements including a publicdigital bookkeeping system directlythrough the tax authority
China initiated a “1000 AccountsPlan” to accelerate its digital taxjourney by focusing on largeenterprises.
Australian tax authority isundergoing an initiative to developadvanced analytics capability toanalyze submissions.
Digitizationlevel Level 1 – E-file Level 2 – E-
accounting Level 3 – E-match Level 4 – E-audit Level 5 – E-assess
Poland is in the process of implementing a broad-based ‘e-Taxes’ programthat will impact client’s digital filing and reporting requirementsPoland
Portugal
Portugal is following global and regionalorganization including EU and OECD intheir approach to digital taxadministration.
Argentina
Peru
Colombia
RussiaLuxembourg
Luxembourg requires submission of digital accounting/financial records under SAF-T (FAIA) upon request
France
Chile
France requires financial data underSAF-T (FEC) for audit purposes andalso has mandatory BTG e-invoicing
Austria Austria requires accounting records underSAF-T and mandatory e-invoicing
Norway
Norway is following EU’s path to digitization –requiring accounting records under SAF-T andmandatory e-invoicing
Lithuania
Lithuania requires of digital VAT and transport recordsin addition accounting under SAF-T upon request
Germany
Germany requires electronic accountingdata as well as tax balance sheets
Colombia is making a move to requiree-invoicing from tax payers
Peru requires accounting records and e-Invoicing to be submitted to the tax authority
Chile requires accounting data to bemaintained and access to taxpayer ERPsystems for audits
Argentina requires e-Invoicing fromtaxpayers and does analytics oninvoices submitted
Russia has been in the process of modernizing and digitizing itstax administration since 2010: requiring detailed data on VAT andtransfer pricing. It is also an active member of OECD.
SouthKorea South Korea has an ‘e-Tax’ initiative
implemented a Tax Integrated System (TIS)that requires submission of transactional dataincluding electronic invoices which is matchedagainst taxes paid
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 7
Different Types of Digital Submission
Type Submission Filing threshold
SAF-T (StandardAudit File for Tax)
Submission can occur either through a direct interface(a configured open proxy) between the ERP systemand the tax authority, or through an upload of thecorrectly formatted ERP generated data to the taxauthority portal.
Mainly companies that are based in thecountry, but depending on therequirement.
Spain SII (SII-SuministroInmediato deInformación)
Submission can occur either through a direct interfacemodule between the ERP system and that of the taxauthority, or through an upload of the ERP generateddata to the tax authority portal in the accepted format.
Companies with annual turnover of over€6 million.
Hungary (AuditFunction)
Submit sales invoices directly to the Hungarian TaxAuthority (directly from ERP system).
Companies who hold a Hungarian VATnumber and issue B2B invoices on whichat least HUF 100,000 (approximatelyEUR 320) VAT is charged.
General data suchas Intrastat, ECSL,VAT returns etc.E-InvoicingBEPS Country byCountry Reports,Direct TaxReturns
Submission can be directly via ERP system, add-onsuch as tax compliance software or direct upload tothe tax authority portal, depending on countryBoth direct as well as indirect tax filings can berequired to be submitted digitally
Varies depending on country
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 8
SAFT Overview
Ø SAFT (Standard Audit File for Tax purposes) is an internationalstandard for electronic exchange of reliable accountingdata from organizations to the national tax authority or externalauditors. The standard is defined by the Organisation forEconomic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Ø The format recognised by OECD is XML format
Ø The aim of SAFT is to simplify tax compliance and tax auditrequirements as it relates to information required for taxpurposes from business and accounting system
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 9
SAFT Overview – in the EU
Tax Authorities Going Digital
► The European Commission is looking to develop an EU SAF-T,along the lines of what is already in force or under developmentin certain Member States. The aim is to both facilitate ongoingcompliance by taxpayers and allow tax administrations to carryout more effective tax audits.
► A pilot project is currently under development in the specificcontext of the MOSS for telecommunications, broadcasting andelectronic services, and further developments may be expectedto follow.
Page 10
SAFT Overview – Timeline
Amended SAFTGuidance papersissued by OECD
Apr-10 Jul-16
PolandSAFT Compliant
FranceMandatory electronic filing of
audit files
Jan-14
PortugalSAFT Compliant
Jan-13Jan-12
LuxembourgSAFT Compliant
AustriaSAFT Compliant
Jan-09
SAFTGuidance
papers issuedby OECD
May-05
GTCBAS May2005.pdf
SAFT April2010.pdf
Romania(XML file, but not
SAFT)
Oct-16
Spain(Immediate informationsharing system in XML,
but not SAFT)
Lithuaniai.MAS
TBCJan-16
HungaryAudit Function – VAT
Invoices
NorwaySAFT Compliant
TBC (2018)
SloveniaSAFT Compliant
July - 17
HungarySubmission of invoices in
XML format
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 11
Preparation for a FAIA based audit
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 12
Seven leading practices for preparing e-audits
1. Identify the required data
Ø The information needed for most e-audits includes details fromcustomer, supplier and product databases. Also one shouldn’tforget items such as the algorithm for attributing VAT codes andother VAT internal procedure.
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 13
Seven leading practices for preparing e-audits
2. Determine which details are requiredØ How and when do the tax authorities require the data?=> FAIA is on a calendar year basis
3. Collaborate across your businessØ The data consists of large amounts of accounting and
management information, spread throughout the ERP or ITsystems. In most organizations, designing effective systemsand processes to collect, store and retrieve the VATinformation needed for an e-audit means involving severalspecialist functions, including tax, finance and IT.
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 14
Seven leading practices for preparing e-audits
4. Create a methodology for storing your data
Ø Also consider the fact that data storage periods differ fromcountry to country — as do the rules related to how and whereyou may store data (for example, online or on paper).
Ø What are the best ways for you to store data long term? Is thesolution sustainable and cost-effective?
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 15
Seven leading practices for preparing e-audits
5. Establish how to retrieve and deliver your data
Ø You must be able to retrieve the data requested on time and inthe right format. You may need to identify specific tools for largedata sets.
Ø Delays in producing it can cause disruption, and even penaltiesand fines.
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 16
Seven leading practices for preparing e-audits
6. Understand the checks that e-auditors apply
Ø What are the tax authorities likely to look for in your data? Doyou know what they might find? Anticipate the outcome of an e-audit by examining the VAT data that the tax auditors will begiven, using the same tools.
Ø By conducting an internal audit before an e-audit is announced,you may avoid unexpected tax adjustments and reduce or evenavoid tax penalties.
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 17
Seven leading practices for preparing e-audits
7. Use e-audit techniques to manage VAT better
Ø Improve your ongoing VAT compliance by using data analyticssoftware and validations. Incorporating these checks into yourregular VAT control processes can greatly reduce tax risk byallowing you to remedy errors and weaknesses as they occur.
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 18
EY approaches for different types ofbusinesses
Businesses withhighly customised
ERP systems
• Assistance withthe customisationof their own ERPsystem
Businesses usinglocal software andwilling to make the
changesthemselves
• Assistance byproviding a list ofkey informationthey need in orderto have the formcorrectlypopulated andtranslate taxrequirements intoIT requirements
Businessesoutsourcing theirVAT compliance
• Assistance withthe list of dataneeded in theirsystem so theycan provide EYwith the requiredinformation topopulate the FAIA
• Assistance in theproduction of theVAT returnsbased on FAIA
IT firms providinglocal ERP
solutions to localbusinesses
• Assistance to ITfirms to updatetheir software toprovide solutionsto theircustomers
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 19
VAT Implications
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 20
VAT Implications
► According to Grand Ducal Decree dated December 21st 1979laying down accounting rules for VAT purposes, the accountingentries should be done in such a way that the elementsnecessary to compute the VAT are non ambiguous and easy tocontrol
• On the income side, the following should be distinguished :• Amounts subject to VAT regrouped according to the applicable VAT rate• Amounts not subject to VAT regrouped according to the reason of the non
application of VAT• The VAT can be booked without distinction per VAT rate
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 21
VAT Implications
• On the charge side, the following should be distinguishedaccording to whether the transaction qualifies as purchase ofgoods/services or as importation of goods. Within thesesections,• Amounts subject to VAT regrouped according to the applicable VAT rate• Amounts not subject to VAT regrouped according to the reason of the non
application of VAT• The VAT can be booked without distinction per VAT rate• A distinction between importation for business purposes and importation
for private purposes is required• An additional distinction has to be made between the transactions for
which VAT is deductible, not deductible or partially deductible
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 22
VAT Implications
► The proper use of VAT codes allows to :
► Automate the processing of VAT reports► Perform quick plausibility check of figures on a periodical basis► Quick reconciliation between the accounting and the VAT returns► Clear distinction between transactions exempt and transactions outside
the scope of VAT► Ease the processing of data analytics
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 23
ANY QUESTIONS ?
THANK YOU,
Tax Authorities Going Digital
Page 24
Contacts Details
Yannick ZeippenEmail Address: [email protected] Number: +352 42 124 7362
Johan KristenssonEmail Address: [email protected] Number: +352 42 124 7006
Patrick ThillEmail Address: [email protected] Number: +352 42 124 7539
9 February 2017 EY Tax Club : VAT update
Tax Authorities Going Digital
The information in this presentation is intended toprovide only a general outline of the subjectscovered. It should not be regarded ascomprehensive or sufficient for making decisions,nor does it replace professional advice.Accordingly, Ernst & Young Tax Advisory ServicesLuxembourg S.à r.l. accepts no responsibility forloss arising from any action taken or not taken byanyone using this information. The informationherein will have been supplemented byexplanations arising from any oral presentation byus and should be considered in the light of thisadditional information. If you require any furtherinformation or explanations, or specific advice,please contact us and we will be happy to discussmatters further.