taiga plains sand pit restoration plan for pit lake end use technical... · inventory of the lease...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Taiga Plains Sand Pit Restoration Plan for Pit Lake End Use
Wilson Dimsdale (#V00186676)
Restoration of Natural Systems Program, University of Victoria
Abstract
The purpose of the project was to develop a reclamation plan for the closure of the
Village of Fort Simpson (VOFS) sand pit, a quarry lease, located within the
Mackenzie and Slave Lowlands Mid-Boreal Ecoregion of the Taiga Plains in the
Northwest Territories. Permission was granted from the VOFS Town Council to
access the site and proceed with the project. Inspection of the quarry lease, site
conditions and plant inventory were completed. A relevé plot was selected in an
undisturbed jack pine (Pinus banksiana) stand located on a partially excavated sand
dune. The purpose of the relevé was for classification of the site and to document a
sample of the vegetation and soil structure prior to the excavation of the sand pit. A
small vegetation plot was selected along the shore of the flooded sand pit. The
purpose of the plot was to document the native species and plant cover. A soil pit
was dug at the relevé plot and the soil attributes recorded. The soil pit samples
consisted of slightly moist, well drained, nearly pure sand (>90%) and identified as
part of the Martin River Association: Brunisolic Order, Great Group: Eutric Brunisol,
Subgroup: Gleyed Eutric Brunisols. The sand pit soils are part of the wind modified
fluvial deposits of the Liard River formed during the Pleistocene. Major site
2
disturbances were identified: (1) sand pit excavations that extended below the
summer water table are now flooded, (2) steeply sloped active working face is
potentially unstable and vulnerable to the effects of erosion, (3) invasive White
Sweet-clover (Melitotus alba) and Yellow Sweet-clover (Melilotus officinalis) satellite
population located in the active excavation area, (4) revegetation of disturbed areas
by native species is limited due to the lack of topsoil, (5) access roads have
compacted soils, (6) and dumped wastes were located on the leased property. Lease
requirements and recommended land use guidelines for the reclamation of quarries
was reviewed in relation to existing site conditions. I recommend that an end-pit
lake be selected as the reclamation ecosystem objective. Phase 1 of the reclamation
will focus on the land-shaping and soil reconstruction. Phase 1 of the reclamation
plan includes: site cleaning, weed control measures, regrading of steep slopes and
application of straw, and scarification of access roads. Phase 2 of the reclamation
will require monitoring the site for several years after the reclamation work is
completed to insure the site is stable, prevent the spread of invasive species, and to
evaluate the functional capacity of the developing ecosystem.
3
Table of Contents
Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 4
Study Area................................................................................................................................................................ 6
General Ecoregion Description ........................................................................................................................ 6
Sand Pit Location and Lease Description .................................................................................................... 7
General Geology and Topography .................................................................................................................. 9
Materials and Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 10
Results ....................................................................................................................................................................... 15
General Inspection................................................................................................................................................ 15
Plant Inventory ...................................................................................................................................................... 16
Relevé Plot #1 ........................................................................................................................................................ 19
Soil Pit ........................................................................................................................................................................ 21
Vegetation Plot #2 ................................................................................................................................................ 23
Recommendations and Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 24
Phase I Reclamation Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 25
Phase II Reclamation Recommendations .................................................................................................... 28
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................... 28
Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................................. 30
References ............................................................................................................................................................... 30
Web Site References ............................................................................................................................................ 32
Appendix I: Plant Inventory .............................................................................................................................. 33
Appendix II: Project Photographs Figures 12 to 17 ................................................................................ 34
4
Introduction
The municipal government of Fort Simpson, the Village of Fort Simpson (VOFS), will
need to begin the process of planning for the eventual closure and reclamation of
the municipal sand pit. The sand pit has been in use for at least 28 years as it is
featured in a topographical map (Fig. 2) that was created from satellite imagery
taken in 1986. The remaining sand reserves will be depleted within 2 - 3 years,
according to VOFS management (M.Gast, pers.comm.). The sand pit is located on
Commissioner’s lands and held by the VOFS as a quarry lease under the
Commissioner’s Land Act (DOL, 2014). This project develops a reclamation plan for
the sand pit with the permission from the VOFS. The reclamation plan is based on
site data interpretation and describes site and plant prescription that satisfies the
reclamation requirements in accordance to the lease terms and conditions and
existing land use guidelines.
Commissioner’s lands are lands in the Northwest Territories (NWT) under control
by municipal governments and the Government of the Northwest Territories (DOL,
2014). The Commissioner’s Land Act requires the lessee of the quarry lease to
restore the land to the satisfaction of the Director. The Director in this case would be
the Government of the Northwest Territories, Department of Lands, Regional
Superintendent for the Dehcho region.
5
Following information requests to the Department of Lands for clarification on
reclamation requirements of quarry leases, I was informed that I was to refer to the
Indian and Northern Affairs publication Northern Land Use Guidelines: Pits and
Quarries when designing a reclamation plan for the sand pit. The main requirement
of these guidelines is the reclamation of pit sites to a natural state that conforms to
the surrounding landscape (Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, 2009). Similar
guidelines were reviewed for further information on accepted standards for sand pit
reclamation methodology, including the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources; Sand
and Gravel Pit Rehabilitation in Northern Ontario contained useful information on
the requirements for site grading and planting and seeding operations (Miller and
Mackintosh, 1987). Another important resource for a broad range of issues
involved with the reclaiming of sand operations was the Ministry of Transportation
and Highways; Reclamation and Environmental Protection Handbook for Sand, Gravel
and Quarry Operations in British Columbia. This reference includes particularly
useful information about weed control methods, restoring compacted soils, and the
creation of wetland habitat (Ministry of Transportation and Highways, 1995).
The Deltaic Sand Plain that the sand pit is located on contains a vast resource of
readily accessible, high quality silica sand with potential industrial applications
beyond the needs of the local community. The sand dunes located on the plain have
been identified as an area with high potential as a source for “frac” sand. Frac sands
have particular properties and are in high demand for shale oil and natural gas well
stimulation process called “fracking” (Levson, Pyle, and Fournier, 2012).
6
Understanding the reclamation requirements for the VOFS sand pit may have
broader applications as Deltaic Sand Plain sand resources are developed for use by
the oil and gas industry.
Study Area
General Ecoregion Description
The Village of Fort Simpson and surrounding area lies within the Mackenzie and
Slave Lowlands Mid-Boreal (MB) Ecoregion. Covering 22% of the southern region of
the Taiga Plains the Mackenzie and Slave Lowlands MB Ecoregion is a cold boreal
climate but has the mildest conditions in the NWT. In July the mean temperature
ranges from 15.5°C to 16.5°C, the warmest month. Precipitation is delivered nearly
evenly split between snowfall (45%) and rain (55%). Mean annual precipitation
ranges from 310 mm to 410 mm. The cold climate and wet conditions in poorly
drained areas allows for the development of peatlands by limiting the rate of
organic matter decomposition. Extensive deciduous and coniferous forests cover
areas of better-drained sites (Fig. 1). This southern region of the Taiga Plains is
considered to be the northern coniferous forest extension of the North American
boreal forest (Scott, 1995). Permafrost is discontinuous in the Mackenzie and Slave
Lowlands Mid-Boreal and associated with large fens and bogs (Ecosystem
Classification Group, 2007).
7
Figure 1. Fort Simpson sand pit satellite image. 61°50’45.36” N 121°23’24.33” W. GOOGLE EARTH. May 22, 2004. April 22, 2014
Sand Pit Location and Lease Description
The VOFS sand pit is located approximately 7 km driving distance heading west
along the Mackenzie Highway from the center of Fort Simpson, NWT. The sand pit is
reached by way of the Mackenzie Highway (Fig. 2) then off-road to an access road
located on the lease parcel. The sand pit access road is traversable for high ground
clearance vehicles.
8
Figure 2. Map of Fort Simpson and the municipal sand pit. Map 95 H/14, Edition 2, 1:50 000, Energy, Mines and Resources Canada
The sand pit (active face) is located at coordinates 61°50’48.43”N 121°23’26.41”W,
Map Datum WGS 84. Elevation above mean sea level is 186 m. The sand pit is
located within the Commissioner’s quarry lease parcel that covers 62.46088 ha. The
lease is square shaped (Fig. 3) with each side measuring approximately 250 m in
length. The lease parcel frontage runs parallel and is adjacent to the Mackenzie
Highway.
9
Figure 3. Image of Fort Simpson sand pit. Scale 1:4,032. Government of the Northwest Territories, Department of Municipal and Community Affairs. www.maca.gov.nt.ca/gis
General Geology and Topography
The VOFS lease lies in the Deltaic Sand Plain Physiographic District of the Liard
River. Most of the Mackenzie and Slave Lowlands MB Ecoregion area were covered
by glacial Lake McConnell during the Pleistocene. The Deltaic Sand Plain consists of
fluvial deposits of the Liard River when it flowed into glacial Lake McConnell. The
Deltaic Sand Plain sand deposits are deepest near the Mackenzie River and
gradually thin out into sandy veneers over morainal deposits in the south. The sand
deposits are normally found as gentle undulating forms but large areas of the plain
have been formed into parabolic sand dunes by wind modification, as seen in Fig. 4.
These sand deposits average 6.09 m deep but can be up to 15.24 m deep in the
dunes. The dunes are heavily wind modified, well sorted, and comprised of nearly
pure silica with low clay and organic content. The sand deposits are now vegetated
10
and soils of the Brunisolic order have developed under the forest cover over time
(Soil Classification Working Group, 1998). The sand deposits provide the parent
material for the Brunisols found over the entire plain (Rostad et al, 1976). Lower
slopes and areas with a high ground water table and poorly drained depressions can
be covered with Organic soils, peaty Rego Gleysols, and Orthic Eutric Brunisols.
Figure 4. Deltaic Sand Plain, vegetated sand dunes and peatlands. View towards north bearing. http://www.geomatics.gov.nt.ca/elcphotos
Materials and Methods
I was aware of the sand pit lease and suspected that it was nearing the end of its
usefulness as a source of sand for the municipal government. I contacted VOFS
11
public works staff about the status of the sand pit and learned that no planning had
been done to prepare for the eventual closure and reclamation of the site. I then
outlined my project proposal to the VOFS Town Council at the regular Town Council
meeting May 6, 2013. I received permission from the Council at the meeting to begin
my project and was granted free access to the sand pit lease. In turn the Council
requested that I provide them with a copy of my project report upon completion, to
which I agreed.
I initially explored the lease by walking around the flooded sand pit and sketching a
map of the general location of topographical features and other physical features,
such as disturbances caused by the excavation activities. Counting the growth rings
from the largest cut down stumps allowed me to the estimate tree stand age. A plant
inventory of the lease was recorded during the inspection and plants were identified
with the assistance from the field guidebooks Plants of the Rocky Mountains
(Kershaw, MacKinnon, and Pojar, 1998) and Edible & Medicinal Plants of the Rockies
(Kershaw, 2000).
Equipment used for the inspection:
A hand held laser rangefinder (Redfield Raider 550) was used to measure
topographical features.
Vegetation cover and topography were recorded and photographed with an
Apple Ipod and a Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS digital camera.
A Cammenga 3H lensatic compass was used for sighting compass bearings.
12
Topographical slope angles were measured using an improvised method. A
clinometer application program on an Apple Ipod device was placed on top of
a 1 m long straight edge 2 x 4 wood board and the angle recorded.
Hand held calculator.
Tree stand canopy heights were measured using the tangent method (Fig. 5). A
hand held laser rangefinder (Redfield Raider 550) was used to measure distances
and a clinometer application program on an Apple Ipod device was used for
measuring angles. Heights were measured for 3 main canopy trees.
Figure 5. Tree height measurement – Tangent Method. http://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/content/measuringheight
A site for a relevé plot was selected that best represented vegetation attributes of
the preexisting condition of the lease. The purpose of the relevé plot was to
13
document the plant inventory adjacent to the disturbances and for the classification
of the site (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 2013). A square 10 m x 10
m plot was selected north of the active face, in an undisturbed stand of trees
dominated by jack pine, (Pinus banksiana) and named Plot #1. The jack pine stand
was chosen as a good example of the typical vegetation growing on the sand dunes
of the sand pit area.
Equipment used for relevé plot:
A hand held Global Positioning System (Garmin Etrex 20 GPS) unit was used
to acquire plot location coordinates.
30 m rolled tape measure.
The relevé plot site data recorded included:
Date, plot size and location
Vegetation group
Native Plant project information (vegetation data sheet)
Tree diameter measurements, DBH 1.3 m
Relevé % assessment of plant coverage
Elevation, slope and slope aspect
Topographical context
Tree stand canopy heights
14
A 1 m x 1 m soil pit was dug to the depth of 70 cm in an undisturbed area of the
lease and soil attributes were recorded and classified using the Canadian System of
Soil Classification.
Equipment used for the soil pit included:
A shovel was used to excavate the soil pit.
30 m rolled tape measure.
Soil pit information recorded included:
L-F-H, organic horizon depth
Mineral-soil layers
General soil texture
Drainage class
Sphagnum coverage
Depth and description each soil layer
Plot #2 is a square shaped 3 m x 3 m plot selected along the north shore of the
flooded sand pit that best represented the most common type of vegetation
regrowth found around the perimeter of the open water. The purpose of the plot
was to identify and quantify the abundance of herbs and shrubs as the majority of
the shoreline lacked tree regrowth.
15
Equipment used for Plot #2:
A hand held Global Positioning System (Garmin Etrex 20 GPS) unit was used
to acquire plot location coordinates and elevation.
30 m rolled tape measure.
Plot #2 site data recorded included:
Date, plot size and location
Native Plant Community information (vegetation data sheet)
Relevé % assessment of plant cover
Results
General Inspection
The sand pit is reached from the Mackenzie Highway by way of a short, doglegged
dirt road that leads to the north side of the sand pit. The access road is free of
vegetation and is comprised of compacted sand. The access road is closed with a
wire rope and snow fencing but not locked. I inspected the lease on foot. The sand
pit area is a large area cleared of all trees and topsoil in a roughly rectangular shape
139 m x 86 m. There was evidence of other anthropogenic impacts with signs of tree
harvesting south of the sand pit, stumps and girdled trees, and wastes dumped over
the southeastern area of the lease. There were no obvious indications of hazardous
waste spills on the lease. The south side tree stand average age was recorded by
counting growth rings from the largest cut down stumps indicating an average age
16
of 50 years. Tree canopy heights were 18.28 m. There were no obvious stockpiles of
topsoil or coarse woody debris that would have been originally stripped from the
site. The woody debris may have been burned in piles or buried with the topsoil,
although I did not find evidence of burning or a burial location on the site area.
Adjacent to the southern border of the lease block are a series of peatlands and fens
and these were photographed for reference, see Appendix II, Fig. 16 and Fig. 17.
Plant Inventory: See Appendix I.
A flooded pit dominates the clearing where sand excavations extended below the
summer water table. I assumed that the pit was flooded by ground water seepage as
south of the lease are large fens and peatlands with standing water. The pond is
roughly rectangular in shape 110.6 m x 65.8 m. The flooded pit’s eastern edge runs
very closely to a magnetic north compass bearing. Water depth of the pond is
estimated to be < 1 m as tested with a pole dipped from the shoreline. Water depths
in the center of the flooded pit were untested.
Floating mats of peat mosses (Sphagnum spp.) covered most of the water surface
(Fig. 6) with blue-green algae (Cyanobacteria spp.) covering the visible bottom. The
water is turbid with low visibility < 0.6 m. There was evidence of water level
fluctuations with shoreline areas of exposed moss that appeared to have recently
been underwater.
17
Revegetation by natural species was occurring in the riparian areas of the flooded
pit. The riparian zone is dominated by grasses (Poaceae spp.), horsetails (Equisetum
spp.) and peat moss (Sphagnum spp.). There are occasional scattered willow (Salix
spp.) and young alder (Alnus spp.) patches.
Invasive plant species were located in the active face excavation area of the sand pit
and included White Sweet-clover (Melitotus alba) and Yellow Sweet-clover
(Melilotus officinalis). These invaders dominated the areas that they had colonized
and appeared to be spreading from one location where dump trucks would be
loaded with sand and had carried seeds to the site from an outside source.
Areas lacking native revegetation were noted along the east and west side of the
flooded sand pit. The west side has a barren section of sandy soil that extended
along the sloped sides of the pit as shown in Appendix II, Fig. 13. The west side of
the pit is defined by an access road that is barren of most vegetation where vehicle
tire tracks compacted the sandy soil. The active face area of the sand pit is located
north of the flooded sand pit and is steeply sloped ranging from 42° - 64° slope
angle.
18
Figure 6. Viewing east from west shore of flooded pit with peat moss. Photo W.D. 2013.
Figure 7. Sketched site inspection map. W.D. 2013.
19
A map (Fig. 7) was sketched from field observations indicating notable features of
the lease and sand pit. Significant features from the sketched map were also
transposed onto a satellite image of the lease in Fig.8.
Figure 8. Satellite image of Fort Simpson sand pit. Scale 1:1,352.
Government of the Northwest Territories, Department of Municipal and Community Affairs.
www.maca.gov.nt.ca/gis
Relevé Plot #1
Date: August 18, 2013
Plot Size: 10 m x 10 m
Location: 61°50’48.9”N 121°23’24.0”W, Map Datum WGS 84
20
Elevation: Above mean sea level is 173.74 m
Vegetation Group: Wooded upland
Native Plant Community:
Common Name Species Name
Jack pine Pinus banksiana
Green alder Alnus viridis
Prickly rose Rosa acicularis
Bog cranberry Vaccinium oxycoccus
Peat moss Sphagnum spp.
Spreading dogbane Apocynum androsaemifolium
Trembling Aspen Populus tremuloides
Tree diameter measurements:
Tree Diameters (all trees in plot)
Species DBH (cm)
Pinus banksiana 56, 38, 92, 83, 51, 27, 34, 29, 23, 18
Populus tremuloides 38, total qty.5 (>20 cm saplings)
Alnus viridis total qty. 2 (>20 cm saplings)
Relevé % assessment of plant coverage:
Plant coverage
Common Name Species Name Coverage Class
Jack pine Pinus banksiana Continuous (75 - 100% cover)
Green alder Alnus viridis Rare (5 - 25% cover)
Prickly rose Rosa acicularis Patches (25 - 50% cover)
Bog cranberry Vaccinium oxycoccus Rare (5 - 25% cover)
Peat moss Sphagnum spp. Continuous (75 - 100% cover)
Spreading dogbane Apocynum androsaemifolium Rare (5 - 25% cover)
Trembling Aspen Populus tremuloides Rare (5 - 25% cover)
21
Slope and slope aspect: Slope 8.1% Aspect: North facing slope
Topographical Context: Upper
Tree stand canopy heights: 21 m, 19.1 m, 16.8 m
Figure 9. Plot #1. Viewing west from plot SE corner. Photo W.D. 2013.
Soil Pit
The soil pit samples consisted of slightly moist, well drained, nearly pure sand
(>90%) and identified as part of the Martin River Association: Brunisolic Order,
Great Group: Eutric Brunisol, Subgroup: Gleyed Eutric Brunisols. The sand pit soils
are part of the wind modified fluvial deposits of the Liard River formed during the
Pleistocene (Rostad, White, and Acton, 1976).
22
L-F-H, organic horizon: 10 cm depth
Mineral-soil layers: Ae, Bm
General soil texture: Loamy sand
Drainage class: Excessively drained
Sphagnum coverage: 100% coverage
Depth and description of each soil layer:
Depth of Layer (cm) Soil Horizon Description
10 L-F-H Moss cover, organic material
10 Ae Light grey loamy sand with roots
>60 Bm Yellowish brown loamy sand
Figure 10. Soil pit showing L-F-H layer. Photo W.D. 2013.
23
Vegetation Plot #2
Date: August 18, 2013
Plot Size: 3 m x 3 m
Location: 61°50’47.7”N 121°23’25.3”W, Map Datum WGS 84
Elevation: Above mean sea level is 184.4 m
Vegetation Group: Wetland site
Native Plant Community:
Common Name Species Name
Northern fir clubmoss Lycopodium selago
Yellow-green peat moss Sphagnum angustifolium
Common cattail Typha latifolia
Grasses Poaceae spp.
Relevé % assessment of plant cover:
Plant coverage
Common Name Species Name Coverage Class
Northern fir clubmoss Lycopodium selago Continuous (75 - 100% cover)
Yellow-green peat moss Sphagnum angustifolium Continuous (75 - 100% cover)
Common cattail Typha latifolia Patches (25 - 50% cover)
Grasses Poaceae spp. Patches (25 - 50% cover)
24
Figure 11. Typical peat moss and grass growing along pond shore. Photo: W.D. 2013
Recommendations and Conclusion
Selection of a closure option for the VOFS quarry lease is determined by the
Commissioner’s Land Act, that states that the quarry site be reclaimed to the
satisfaction of the Director. Currently, the Government of the Northwest Territories,
Department of Lands controls and regulates quarry leases on Commissioner’s lands
in the NWT. The Department of Lands was contacted for information on their
reclamation requirements for quarry leases. I was instructed to utilize the
Department of Indian and Northern Affairs publication, Northern Land Use
Guidelines: Pits and Quarries as the accepted guidelines for the reclamation of these
quarry leases. These guidelines state that the main reclamation objective for most
pit sites in the NWT is to return the site to a natural condition that blends in with
the surrounding topography and landscape. Furthermore, an end-pit lake was an
25
acceptable closure objective for a flooded pit site (Indian and Northern Affairs
Canada, 2009). Based on the reclamation guidelines, existing site conditions, and the
fact that the VOFS lease is located adjacent to natural fens and peatlands, I
recommend that the Phase I reclamation objective be an end-pit lake.
Phase I Reclamation Recommendations
Examination and sampling of the VOFS sand pit indicates that natural species are
revegetating most of the impacted areas of the site that were originally stripped of
topsoil during past sand excavation activities. The flooded sand pit shows similar
native plant growth as adjacent fens with peat moss established throughout the
water and shores line. I do not think it is necessary to interfere with the flooded
sand pit natural revegetation process.
Areas of concern that should be addressed during the reclamation include: the
barren west and east sides of the flooded pit, the active face area, the access roads,
and the invasive plant species.
The discovery of significant amounts of dumped wastes in the southeast section of
the lease will require a plan to remove and properly dispose of these wastes.
Although no hazardous waste spills were located during the investigation of the
lease, the area should be carefully examined again for hazardous waste spills that
may have initially gone unnoticed. The nonhazardous wastes can either be buried
onsite or transported to a suitable waste management facility. Hazardous wastes
26
spills located are to be reported to the Government of the Northwest Territories,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources who are the lead investigation
agency for Commissioner’s lands.
The invasive plant species White Sweet-clover (Melitotus alba) and Yellow Sweet-
clover (Melilotus officinalis) located in the active face excavation area of the sand pit
are a serious threat to the successful reestablishment of native plants in the sand pit
as they are capable of out-competing most native plant species. These invaders only
live for 1-2 years, but each plant can produce thousands of seeds during its lifespan
and these seeds may survive for decades in the soil. As this is a satellite population, I
recommend that the plants be pulled out by hand and destroyed by burning. Pulling
is an effective method for these species when they are growing on sandy soil
(Anderson, 2013).
The west side of the sand pit shows the effects of the slope angle increasing the
runoff and lack of topsoil reducing the moisture holding capacity of the sloped pit
sides. The combined effects appear to be preventing the establishment of natural
vegetation. I ruled out erosion as the primary issue as the 15° slope angle is a
shallower than the recommended minimum 18.5° slope angle considered to be
effective erosion control (Miller and Mackintosh, 1987) and vegetation was
reestablished and growing near the water and close to the remaining jack pine
(Pinus banksiana) stand at the top of the slope. As no stockpiled topsoil was available
at the site, I recommend that a thin layer (1-2 cm thick) of clean straw be used as a
27
topsoil substitute and be added over the barren areas of the western side of the pit. I
believe the straw application will help trap and retain moisture, allowing natural
plants to germinate and survive on the slopes without acting like a mulch and
blocking the sunlight from reaching the soil. The straw should have the added
benefits of being relatively inexpensive and readily available from Alberta suppliers.
The east pit side access road soils and main access road are compacted from past
heavy equipment traffic. The compacted soils appear to have formed a traffic pan, a
dense layer of soil that limits or stunts root growth (Brady and Weil, 2008). I
recommend deep ripping of the access roads to loosen the compacted soils, restore
soil structure, and improve support for native plant growth. An addition benefit of
ripping the access roads is it should prevent people from driving into the lease and
dumping any more wastes. The deep ripping should also be applied at the end of the
Phase I reclamation work to allow easy access to the site for as long as possible.
The active face of the sand pit is devoid of topsoil and plant growth and the face is
steeply angled between 42° - 64° slope angle. The maximum slope angle considered
for long-term slope stability is 26.6° (Miller and Mackintosh, 1987), the active face
should be considered unstable and unsuitable for plant growth in the current state.
The exposed sandy soil is vulnerable to the effects of erosion (Brady and Weil,
2008). I recommend that the entire active face slope be resloped to a minimum of
18.5° slope angle for erosion control and insuring long-term slope stability. The
resloped surface should have straw spread over the surface to improve moisture
28
retention and avoid the issues associated with the west side of the sand pit. I do not
recommend seeding operations, as there is the risk of introducing more invasive
plant species to the site (Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, 2009). The
revegetation of the site should occur naturally by native species that are adapted to
the conditions found on the rapidly draining sand dune soils of the Deltaic Sand
Plain and the associated peatlands in the wetter areas.
Phase II Reclamation Recommendations
Phase 2 of the reclamation will require monitoring the site for several years after
the Phase I reclamation work is completed. The resloped surfaces should be
monitored to insure the site remains stable and is not affected by erosion. The weed
control will require yearly monitoring and some active pulling of plants as
remaining stockpiles of seeds grow. The application of straw to the barren sloped
surfaces will need to be monitored for its effectiveness in improving the survival of
native plant species revegetating these areas. The functional capacity of the
developing peatland ecosystem of the flooded sand pit will need to be monitored to
insure that it resembles the natural fens and peatlands in the surrounding area.
Conclusion
The VOFS sand pit excavation activities has impacted a large area of the lease block.
Fortunately, the reclamation requirements of the Commissioner’s quarry lease and
the recommended reclamation guidelines allow the flooded pit to remain as an end-
pit lake. The Deltaic Sand Plain is dotted with many fens and peatlands and the sand
29
pit appears to be slowly transforming into a similar wet ecosystem. Resloping the
active face to an acceptable slope angle will allow native plant species to revegetate
the surface. The addition of straw as a substitute for spreading topsoil should
improve the survival of native plant species by increasing the available moisture on
barren slopes. Ripping the access roads will improve soil structure allowing native
plant species to grow on these areas. Removal of the hard road surfaces should
prevent unauthorized access by vehicles to the site. I believe that all of Phase I
reclamation work could be completed with the VOFS municipal heavy equipment
and human resources if required. Utilizing the VOFS existing capacity will minimize
the costs of the sand pit reclamation work.
30
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the Village of Fort Simpson elected officials for permitting me
to conduct the sand pit reclamation study. I would like to thank Village of Fort
Simpson Staff Member Mitch Gast for providing me with additional information
about the municipal sand pit.
References
Anderson, H. 2013. Invasive White Sweet Clover (Melilotus albus) best Management
Practices in Ontario. Ontario Invasive Plant Council. Peterborough, ON.
Brady, N.C. and Weil, R.R. 2008. The Nature and Properties of Soils. Person Prentice
Hall. 14th Edition.
Ecosystem Classification Group. 2007. Ecological Regions of the Northwest
Territories – Taiga Plains. Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT, Canada.
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. 2009. Northern Land Use Guidelines: Pits and
Quarries. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.
Kershaw, L.J. 2000. Edible & Medicinal Plants of the Rockies. Lone Pine Publishing.
31
Kershaw, L.J., MacKinnon, A., and Pojar, J. 1998. Plants of the Rocky Mountains. Lone
Pine Publishing.
Levson, V.M., Pyle, J.P., and Fournier, M. 2012. Identification of Potential Silica Sand
Deposits in the Northwest Territories. Northwest Territories Geoscience Office.
Open File 2012-6.
Miller, R.J., and Mackintosh, E.E. 1987. Sand and Gravel Pit Rehabilitation in
Northern Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Land Management Branch.
Ministry of Transportation and Highways. 1995. Reclamation and Environmental
Protection Handbook for sand, Gravel and Quarry Operations in British Columbia.
British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources; Ministry of
Transportation and Highways, and Natural Resources Canada.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2013. A Handbook for Collecting
Vegetation Plot Data in Minnesota: The Relevé Method. 2nd Edition. Minnesota
Biological and Ecological Land Classification Program. Biological Report 92. St. Paul:
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Rostad, H.P.W., White, R.A., and Acton, D.F. 1976. Soil Survey and Land Evaluation of
the Liard and Mackenzie River Area Northwest Territories. Saskatchewan Institute
of Pedology Publications.
32
Scott, G. A. J. 1995. Canada’s Vegetation: A World’s Perspective. McGill-Queen’s
University Press.
Soil Classification Working Group. 1998. The Canadian System of Soil Classification.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Publication 1646. Third Edition.
Web Site References
DOL.2014. Department of Lands, Government of the Northwest Territories.
Commissioner’s Lands Act.
http://www.lands.gov.nt.ca/legislation
33
Appendix I: Plant Inventory
Common Name Species Name
Jack pine Pinus banksiana
Green alder Alnus viridis
Prickly rose Rosa acicularis
Bog cranberry Vaccinium oxycoccus
Peat moss Sphagnum spp.
Spreading dogbane Apocynum androsaemifolium
Trembling Aspen Populus tremuloides
Northern fir clubmoss Lycopodium selago
Yellow-green peat moss Sphagnum angustifolium
Common cattail Typha latifolia
Grasses Poaceae spp.
Labrador tea Ledum groen landicum
Bear berry Arctostaphyles spp.
High bush cranberry Viburnum edule
White spruce Picea glauca
Willows Salix spp.
Common scouring-rush Equisetum hyemale
Common sweet clover Melitotus officinalis
White Sweet-clover Melitotus alba
Red-osier dogwood Cornus sericea
Common dandelion Taraxacum officinale
34
Appendix II: Project Photographs
Figure 12. Plot #1 Example of moss ground coverage. Photo W.D. 2013.
Figure 13. West side of sand pit looking north. Photo W.D. 2013.
35
Figure 14. View to the north from south shore of sand pit. Active face in distance.
Photo W.D. 2013.
Figure 15. Soil pit Ae and Bm horizon. Photo W.D. 2013.
36
Fig 16. Peatlands, south of lease block. Photo W.D. 2013.
Fig 17. Peatlands, south of lease block. Photo W.D. 2013.