system finances (finance 101)
DESCRIPTION
System Finances (Finance 101). Board of Trustees October 2014. Agenda. Introduce board policy framework Review major trends Provide overview of the system’s operating budget and capital investment program. Board policy framework. Board financial responsibilities. Provide oversight - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator.
System Finances (Finance 101)
Board of Trustees October 2014
2
Agenda
Introduce board policy framework Review major trends Provide overview of the system’s operating budget
and capital investment program
3
Board policy framework
4
Board financial responsibilities
Provide oversight Set policy Approve certain decisions
5
Decisions requiring board approval Revenue and expenditure annual operating budget plans - establishment
of financial management policies including the reserve policy - acceptance and release of annual audited financial statements
Biennial budget requests -tuition and fee rates - optional fee maximums -room and board rates - student union facilities fees
Contracts of three million dollars or more (policy change to $1M pending) - sale or disposition of real property -retirement program administration and oversight
Criteria for multi-year capital budgets -prioritized multi-year capital investment program -revenue fund debt management and all bond sales
System information technology long range strategic plan -approval of finance and IT related policies
6
Financial authorities the board has delegated to the chancellor Procurement and professional/technical contracts over $100,000 less than
$3M (change to $1M under board consideration)
Master facilities plan for the colleges/universities
Execution and delivery of all documents regarding the acquisition, disposal, transfer or leasing of real property after Board approval
Systemwide reserve and institutional reserves per board policy
Oversight of college/university financial management
Naming of buildings, sites and common areas
Master technology plans for colleges/universities
Development and management of acceptable use procedure for information technology related resources and assets
7
Financial authorities the chancellor has delegated to the presidents Administrative and financial management
Budget monitoring
Composite financial index oversight
Purchases and professional/technical contracts Up to $100,000
Optional fees up to Board-approved maximums
Individual tuition and fee waivers per policy
Fundraising for the college/university
Acceptance of gifts & grants, except for real property
Leasing real property
College/university financial reporting
8
Vice chancellor assurance practices
Annual financial reviews with campus leadership Monthly, quarterly and semiannual monitoring reports Watch list and work out protocols Regional financial and facilities quarterly management
meetings Facilities program management reviews Strong communication systems
9
Board financial risk management strategy Annual financial statement/audit discipline
Operating budget reserves maintenance/improvement policy
Unrestricted net asset improvements
Composite financial index improvements
Capital improvements tied to facilities condition index
10
Major trends
11
Revenue drivers
State economic outlook Public support for public higher education Tuition rate and competitive environment Overall enrollment Federal and state financial aid funding policy
12
Cost drivers
Negotiated contracts (salaries and benefits) Enrollments Health care costs (employer-paid insurance cost) Technology (investments in new technology and
system maintenance) Size of campus physical plants, building operations,
maintenance and preservation
13
Primary dynamics Enrollment – local management within system strategic
framework Tuition and revenue – board establishes rates,
colleges/universities collect and spend Financial aid revenue – state and federal program guidelines Gifts and fund raising – colleges/universities solicit and spend State support – established by legislature, allocated per board
approved method Wage and benefit costs – based upon state or board approved
systemwide contracts
14
FYE enrollment grew rapidly but has fallen since its peak in 2011
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 est
2015 est
110,000
120,000
130,000
140,000
150,000
160,000
170,000
132,586
135,494 135,839
143,924
157,903
153,447
144,609
142,274
Fiscal Year
FYE
15
Tuition revenue and state support per FYE remains stable in constant dollars
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 est
2015 est
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
$10,000
$11,000
$7,187 $7,445
$8,501
$9,240 $8,811 $8,917
$9,679 $9,950
$7,187 $7,091
$7,586 $7,756
$7,280 $6,992 $7,331
$7,388
Actual Constant Dollars
16
State support increasing
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 est
2015 est
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
33.7%
44.7%47.4% 48.6%
55.2%60.1% 58.0% 56.1%
66.3%
55.3%52.6% 51.4%
44.8%
39.9%42.0%
43.9%
Tuition Appropriation
Changing relationship between tuition and state support
17
State support per student FYE has begun to improve in constant dollars, but is still 32% below 2002 levels
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 est
2015 est
$-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$4,766
$4,368
$3,924 $3,715
$3,994
$3,847
$3,980 $3,863
$3,261 $3,070
$2,787 $2,813
$3,079 $3,247
18
Minnesota’s most affordable higher education option
Carl
eton
M
acal
aste
rSt
. Ola
fG
usta
vus
St. B
ened
ict
St. J
ohn'
sSt
. Tho
mas
Ham
line
Aug
sbur
gCo
ncor
dia,
Moo
rhea
dM
pls
Art
& D
esig
nSt
. Cat
heri
neBe
thel
St. S
chol
astic
aSt
. Mar
y's
Nor
thw
este
rnBe
than
yA
rt In
stitu
tes,
MN
Crow
nIn
stitu
te o
f Pro
ducti
on &
Rec
ordi
ngD
unw
oody
Conc
ordi
a, S
t. P
aul
Nor
th C
entr
alM
N S
choo
l of B
usin
ess
Glo
be
Arg
osy,
Tw
in C
ities
Dul
uth
Busi
ness
O
ak H
ills
Cros
sroa
dsCa
pella
Mpl
s Bu
sine
ss C
olle
geW
alde
nU
of M
Tw
in C
ities
Rasm
usse
n Co
llege
U o
f M R
oche
ster
U o
f M D
ulut
hU
of M
Mor
ris
Mar
tin L
uthe
rN
W H
ealt
h Sc
ienc
esU
of M
Cro
okst
onSo
uthw
est
MN
Sta
te
MSU
Moo
rhea
dW
inon
a St
ate
Bem
idji
Stat
e M
SU, M
anka
toSt
. Clo
ud S
tate
M
etro
polit
an S
tate
A
noka
Tec
hnic
alN
orm
anda
le C
CD
akot
a Co
unty
TC
MN
Sta
te -S
E Te
chni
cal
MN
Wes
t C&
TCRo
ches
ter
C&TC
Nor
thla
nd C
&TC
Rive
rlan
d CC
Nor
thw
est
Tech
nica
lN
orth
Hen
nepi
n CC
Cent
ral L
akes
Col
lege
Ridg
ewat
er C
olle
geA
lexa
ndri
a T&
CCSo
uth
Cent
ral C
olle
geCe
ntur
y Co
llege
MN
Sta
te C
&TC
Rain
y Ri
ver
CCV
erm
illio
n CC
Hib
bing
CC
Itas
ca C
CSt
. Clo
ud T
&CC
Mes
abi R
ange
CC
Inve
r H
ills
CCFo
nd d
u La
c Tr
ibal
&CC
Sain
t Pa
ul C
olle
geH
enne
pin
Tech
nica
lLa
ke S
uper
ior
Colle
gePi
ne T
echn
ical
Ano
ka-R
amse
y CC
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
$50,000
Most Expen-sive
Least Expensive
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
Private colleges and universities; University of Minnesota
College/University
20
13
-14
Tu
itio
n a
nd
Re
qu
ired
Fe
es
Source: Chronicle of Higher Education, October 23, 2013
Affordability: Tuition & fees as a percent of median income
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 20140%
10%
20%
30%
40%
4.9% 4.9% 5.1% 5.1% 5.4% 5.6% 5.7% 5.7% 5.9% 5.8%
6.4%6.4% 6.7% 6.8% 7.3% 7.5% 7.7% 7.7% 8.1%
8.0%10.7%
10.9% 11.2% 11.6%12.8% 13.6% 14.3% 14.4% 15.0%
14.8%
27.7% 28.0%28.9% 29.1%
33.2%34.4%
35.5% 35.0%36.9% 37.0%
State Colleges State Universities University of Minnesota
Private Colleges and Universities
Tu
itio
n &
Fe
es
as
% o
f M
ed
ian
Inc
om
e
19 Source: System Office Research – Academic and Student Affairs
20
Income Levels for State Grant Recipients
Average 2014-2015 Student Tuition Cost
Income Levels for State Grant Recipients
Average 2014-2015 Student Tuition Cost
Less than $20,000 $626 Less than $20,000 $801
$20,000 to $39,999 $1,197 $20,000 to $39,999 $1,254
$40,000 to $59,999 $2,062 $40,000 to $59,999 $2,671
$60,000 and above $3,134 $60,000 and above $4,419
Average for all state grant recipients
$1,247Average for all
state grant recipients$2,022
Non-state grant recipients $4,816 Non-state grant recipients $6,782
2014-2015 tuition rate for full-time students (30 Credits - 15 per term)minus estimated state and Pell grants
Estimated net student tuition cost in fiscal year 2015
State Colleges State Universities
21
Inflation adjusted expenses per FYE remain below pre-recession levels
FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 $6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
$10,000
$11,000
$12,000
$10,277 $10,249
$9,719 $9,599
$9,967 $10,052 $10,145 $10,313
$9,582 $9,325
$8,981
$9,442
22
Institutional support expenses per FYE
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 $1,000
$1,100
$1,200
$1,300
$1,400
$1,500
$1,600
$1,700
$1,398 $1,417
$1,342
$1,436 $1,456
$1,455
$1,381 $1,357
$1,259
$1,327
Actual Adjusted for inflation
23
Reduction in the size of the system office
FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013$25
$27
$29
$31
$33
$35
$37
$39
$41
$43
$45
2.0%
2.2%
2.4%
2.6%
2.8%
3.0%
3.2%
3.4%
3.6%
3.8%
38.8
39.4
36.737.1
39.0
40.541.0
43.5
39.8
36.7
33.1 33.1
3.7%
3.6%
3.2% 3.2%
3.1% 3.1%
2.9%
3.0%
2.6%
2.3%
2.2%2.3%
System Office Appropriation System Office Percentage of Systemwide GEN Revenue
Appr
opria
tion
in M
illio
ns
24
Institutional spending restraint continues
System ranks 38th out of 51 in institutional spending per FYE
Rankings have averaged 37th-40th last four years Spending is 15% below the national average per FYE Spending levels per FYE are below all contiguous
neighbors (Iowa, WI, North Dakota, South Dakota)
25
Operating budget
26
Revenue Trends
State Appropriation Tuition (Gross) Total Change0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Percent Share of Revenue General Fund
FY2009 - FY2013(nominal dollars)
FY2009 FY2013
27
Expense Trends
Salaries & Benefits Operating Expenses Change0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
General fund expenses FY2009 vs FY2013(nominal dollars)
FY2009 FY2013
28
FY 2016-17 financial outlook
Improved, but risk of softening state funding environment
Continued commitment to affordable tuition Uncertain enrollment outlook Contract settlements known
29
Pressures from all sidesInvestment requirements for quality academic and student support are pressured by: Affordability commitment holding down tuition revenue Enrollment growth strategies needed to best serve the state State investment levels up slightly after years of sharp decline Capital investment requirements (buildings and technology)
competing for campus operating funds Accreditation agencies and Board of Trustees increasing focus
on financial sustainability of colleges and universities increasing pressure for net asset and operating margin improvements
30
FY2014-2015 all-funds budget
($ in millions)FY2014 Budget
FY2015 Budget
Dollar Change
Percent Change
Revenues $1,919.9 $1,924.7 $4.8 0.3%
Expenses $1,907.3 $1,919.9 $12.6 0.7%
Budget balance $12.6 $ 4.8
31
General fund budget
($ in millions)FY2014 Budget
FY2015 Budget
Dollar Change
Percent Change
RevenuesState appropriation $587.9 $622.1 $34.2 5.8%Tuition $811.8 $793.5 ($18.3) -2.3%Other revenues $113.4 $104.8 ($8.6) -7.6%
Programmed fund balance $14.9 $15.0 $0.1 0.3%Total budgeted revenues $1,528.0 $1,535.4 $7.4 0.5%
ExpensesCompensation $1,139.9 $1,156.7 $16.8 1.5%Other operating costs $379.4 $376.5 ($2.9) -0.8%
$1,519.3 $1,533.2 $13.9 0.9%
Budget balance $8.7 $2.2
Composite financial index Trends for college and universities
< 1.00 1.00 - 3.00 3.00 - 5.00 5.00 - 7.00 -
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
201120122013
Composite Financial Index
Num
ber o
f Ins
tituti
ons
33
K-12 Education42%
Health & Human Services
29%
All Other Expenses9%
Property Tax Aids & Credits
8%
Higher Education7%
Public Safety & Ju-diciary
5%
State of MinnesotaGeneral Fund Expenditures FY2014-2015 Biennium
$39.6 Billion Total
34
Office of Higher Ed-ucation
16%
University of Min-nesota
41%
MN State Colleges & Universities
43%
Higher Education State Funding FY2014-2015 Biennium$2.8 Billion Total
35
Tuition86557%
State Appropriation55337%
Other916%
Minnesota State Colleges and UniversitiesFY2013 General Fund– Revenues
$1,509 Million Total
Source: FY2013 Audited Financial State-ments
36
Allocation process
37
Revenue practices All tuition and fee revenue is collected and retained
by the colleges and universities. These funds are not centrally redistributed
All grants and gifts controlled by the colleges and universities
All auxiliary income controlled by the colleges and universities
All state funds appropriated to the Board and distributed to the colleges and universities in a lump sum
38
State support allocation
Institutional allocations: priority funds and institutional base allocations
Systemwide set asides: enterprise technology, debt service (system share), attorney general, etc.
System office support
39
“Allocation Framework” provides a method for distributing state funds to colleges and universities
A single model that equitably recognizes the diversity of Minnesota State College and University students' needs and supports the unique educational goals of each institution.
Allocation of funds are based on a number of factors such as enrollment, cost of instruction, national benchmark data, and other institutional data.
Allocation framework distributed $461M in FY2015 Framework changes now under study by the Charting the
Future implementation team on system incentives and rewards
40
Allocation framework design
Student Support and Administrative Services (30%)
Instruction (56%)
Facilities (8%)
Library (4%)
Research and Public Service (2%)
41
Allocation framework design principles
Methodology used to distribute base funds to colleges and universities:Rewards cost efficient instructionState funds follow enrollment changesSubstantially formulaic
CTF work asking: What does it incent and reward now? What should it incent and reward?
42
Capital investment
43
Capital financing
Campus resources from operating budget or gifts General obligation bonds sold by the state to finance
new construction, renovation or demolition of academic and program space to improve learning
Revenue bonds sold by the Board to finance revenue producing facilities such as dormitories, dining halls, student unions, etc.
Net assets by fund type FY2013(in millions)
44
General172283%
Revenue21810%
Other1437%
45
Total capital investment - bonds(FY2000-2014)
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
Capital Projects HEAPR Revenue Fund
Mill
ions
GO debt service as percent of total expenses
46
FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 $-
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
$1,800,000
$2,000,000
While continuing to invest in infrastructure, debt service has remained a fraction of overall MnSCU expenses
Expenditures and Prinicipal Total G.O. Debt
Mill
ions
(nom
inal
dol
lars
) 1.1%1.0%
1.3%
1.2%1.3%
1.5% 1.1%1.5%
1.4%
47
Summary
Affordability commitment Enrollment growth strategies Capital budget development underway – spring 2015
approval Operating budget development underway - spring
2015 approval FY2014 audit underway – November 2014
presentation
48
End deck