sustainable waste

Upload: yk-ykk

Post on 06-Mar-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Sustainable Waste

TRANSCRIPT

  • Sustainable management of

    construction waste

    for Hong Kong

    Professor C.S. Poon

    Dept of Civil and Structural Engineering The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

  • Construction Waste 15 Million tonnes

    in 2009

    Batching plants

    Excavation

    Construction

    Refurbishment

    Renovation

    Demolition

    Road Work

    C&D Waste

  • 15

    C&D Waste Generation

    Inert C&D materials (mainly sand, bricks and concrete) both suitable for land reclamation and land formation works, are disposed of at public filling areas.

    Non inert portion (bamboo, plastics, glass, wood, paper, vegetation and other organic materials) ends up at municipal solid waste landfills.

  • 2

  • 6

    Salvageable Scraps Reuse/Recycling

    C&D Waste

    C&D Waste Management in Hong Kong

    Non-inert Portion - Landfills

    Inert Portion Public fills Mixed waste Sorting facility

  • 3

    Construction Waste (source EPD)

    (2008)

    5%

    86%

    10%

    Sorting Facilities

    2,080 tpd

    Public Fill

    Reception Facilities

    18,680 tpd

    Landfills

    1,020 tpd

    Total: 21,780 tpd

    Figures may not add up to total due to rounding-off

  • 93% 7%

    Non-inert

    68% 25%

    Soft Hard

    20% 5%

    Recyclable Non-recyclable

    Inert

    Construction Waste

    (Approx. 15.4 M tonnes in Year 2009) (source CEDD)

  • 8 8

    C&D Materials Management Facilities

    Locations

  • 30

    The Problem

    Hong Kong will soon be running out of both landfill space and public filling areas.

    According to Government sources :

    Landfills will be filled up soon.

    Limited reclamation projects. Temporary fill banks will be full soon.

  • 11

  • 12

    Delivery of Reclamation Material to Mainland

  • 13

    Designated Reclamation Site in Mainland

    20km

  • 14

    Construction Waste Disposal

    Charging Scheme

    Implemented on 1 Dec 2005

    Government waste disposal

    facilities Type of construction waste accepted

    Charge per

    tonne

    Public fill reception facilities Consisting entirely of

    inert construction waste $27

    Sorting facilities

    Containing more than 50% by

    weight of inert construction

    waste

    $100

    Landfills

    Containing not more than 50% by

    weight of inert construction

    waste

    $125

    Outlying Islands Transfer

    Facilities

    Containing any percentage of

    inert construction waste $125

  • 5

    Waste Management Hierarchy

    1. Avoid waste generation

    2. Minimize waste generation

    3. Reuse/Recycle the material

    4. Proper disposal of waste

    AVOID

    MINIMISE

    REUSE/RECYCLE

    DISPOSAL

  • CWDCS presentation by CS Poon 15

  • Nature of C&D waste Mixture of inert & non-inert materials

    16

    Soft inert

    materials

    Hard inert

    materials

    Non-inert

    materials

    FILLS

    FILLS/

    RECYCL

    E

    LANDFIL

    LS

    CWDCS presentation by CS Poon

  • 24

    Form work Finish work Concrete

    work

    Masonry

    work

    Material

    handling

    Scaffolding

    work

    Hoarding

    Ranking of Major Waste Producing Processes

    on Building Sites

    Source : HK PolyU

  • 25

    Damaged during

    laying

    19%

    Cutting Waste

    39%

    Damaged during

    storage

    11%

    Over Order

    15%

    Damaged during

    transportation

    16%

    Figure 6 Major Causes of Waste for Brick/Block

    (Source: Hong Kong PolyU [ 6 ] )

  • 26

    Over order

    11%

    Others

    7%Cutting waste

    40%

    Damaged during

    storage

    29%

    Change of design

    13%

    Figure 8 Major Causes of Waste for Tiles

    (Source: Hong Kong PolyU [ 6 ] )

    Source : HK PolyU

  • 35

    Dimensional Coordination and

    Standardization

  • 36

    Minimizing Temporary Works

    In Hong Kong, most of the

    waste arising from

    temporary works is due to

    the use of timber

    formworks

  • 37

    Minimizing Temporary Works

    Alternatives to be considered:

    system formworks (metal or aluminum

    formworks) that can be reused and/or

    recycled

    Prefabricated elements (facades, slabs,

    staircases, etc)

  • 38

    Minimizing Temporary Works

    Other reusable alternatives to be considered:

    Metal temporary work

    Metal platform work

    Reusable safety system

    Metal scaffolding or mixed

    bamboo and metal scaffolding

    Metal hoarding

  • 39

    Waste reduction 0.21

    Labor dependence 0.56

    Developers requirement 0.76

    Familiarity with the construction tecnology 1.11

    Construction cost 1.31

    Construction time 1.33

    Figure 8: Factors that determined a construction method selection

    (Question 25)

    0.21

    0.56

    0.76

    1.11

    1.31

    1.33

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

    Waste reduction

    Labor dependence

    Developers requirement

    Familiarity with the construction tecnology

    Construction cost

    Construction time

    Fa

    cto

    rs

    Index

    Construction Method Selection

  • 43

    On-site Low Waste Building Technologies

    Formworks:

    Large panel formwork.

    Steel, aluminum and plastic

    forms.

    Composite steel decking.

    Pecaform.

  • 45

    Off-site: Precast and Prefabrication

  • Construction Waste Disposal

    Charging Scheme Implemented in Dec 2005

    Government waste disposal facilities

    Type of construction waste accepted

    Charge per

    tonne

    Public fill reception facilities

    Consisting entirely of inert construction waste

    $27

    Sorting facilities Containing more than 50% by

    weight of inert construction waste

    $100

    Landfills Containing not more than 50%

    by weight of inert construction waste

    $125

    Outlying Islands Transfer Facilities

    Containing any percentage of inert construction waste

    $125

  • Aim of Study

    How much construction waste has been reduced?

    What changes has taken place among building professionals ?

    What are the impact of CWDCS on major work trades on construction sites ?

    What are the barriers for changes ?

    28 CWDCS presentation by CS Poon

  • Research Methodology

    Questionnaire Totally 319 nos. of questionnaires w; 109 nos. of

    questionnaires returned

    Structured interviews

    One to one structured interviews with difference

    construction professionals

    Case Studies

    Three detailed case studies

    29 CWDCS presentation by CS Poon

  • After the WCS has been implemented, what is the extent of changes (% increase in waste disposal cost) you allowed in bidding new

    projects?

    30 CWDCS presentation by CS Poon

    1.1%

    7.4% 7.4%

    19.8% 21.0%

    17.3%

    9.9%

    6.2% 7.4%

    2.5%

    0 No change

    < 0.05% 0.05% < 0.1%

    0.1% < 0.3%

    0.3% < 1%

    1% < 1.5%

    1.5% < 2 %

    over 2% no answer

  • Research Findings

    Level of Waste Generation (After CWDCS)

    31 CWDCS presentation by CS Poon

    5.0%

    11.3%

    40.0%

    28.8%

    3.8%

    10.0%

    1.1%

    -15% < -10% -10% < -5% -5% < 0% No change 0% < 1% over 3% No answer

  • Research Findings

    Barriers of On-site Waste Sorting

    32 CWDCS presentation by CS Poon

    All respondents Building Engineer Project Manager Quantity Surveyor

    Mean Rank Mean Rank Mean Rank Mean Rank

    Narrow site access 5.21 7 4.42 4 5.38 7 5.32 6

    Limited waste storage area on site 3.70 1 2.58 1 4.35 5 3.44 1

    No sorting area on site 3.86 2 4.17 3 3.85 2 3.76 3

    Intensive labor cost in sorting wastes 4.19 4 5.75 6 3.21 1 4.62 5

    High supervisory to subcontractor's

    behaviors

    4.16 3 5.75 6 4.29 4 3.47 2

    Low waste sortability 4.86 6 5.17 5 4.24 3 5.38 7

    Interference with normal site activities 4.55 5 4.42 4 4.76 6 4.38 4

    Impractical in using too many waste chutes 5.46 8 3.75 2 5.91 8 5.62 8

  • Research Findings

    Changes after CWDCS implemented

    33 CWDCS presentation by CS Poon

    All respondents

    Building Engineer

    Project Manager

    Quantity Surveyor

    Mean Rank Mean Rank Mean Rank Mean Rank

    Reduction of site wastage level 3.30 3 2.95 3 3.10 3 3.71 5

    More efficiency in waste sorting on site 4.15 6 4.86 6 4.38 6 3.56 4

    Improvement in materials estimation before ordering

    3.82 4 4.14 5 3.57 4 4.00 6

    Improvement in inventory monitoring 3.87 5 3.86 4 4.16 5 3.48 3

    Increase environmental awareness 2.84 1 2.55 1 2.82 1 2.98 1

    Increase materials recycling awareness 3.02 2 2.64 2 2.96 2 3.27 2

  • 34 CWDCS presentation by CS Poon

    Conclusions less than 5% waste reduction has been achieved since the CWDCS

    Charge is not high enough to raise the awareness of waste management at construction sites.

    Wet-finishing & dry-finishing trades have

    undergone little changes

    CWDCS has NOT motivated subcontractor to change their methods of construction

  • On-site waste sorting is more possible at large construction sites

    Need to have other measures, such as inclusion of waste reduction requirements

    in contractual clauses and government

    regulations, to effect the waste reduction

    CWDCS presentation by CS Poon 35

  • Eco-friendly

    Construction

    Materials

    Professor Chi-Sun Poon www.eco-block.hk

  • 93% 7%

    Non-inert

    68% 25%

    Soft Hard

    20% 5%

    Recyclable Non-recyclable

    Inert

    Construction Waste

    (Approx. 15.4 M tonnes in Year 2009) (source CEDD)

  • Incoming C&D Materials

    Sorting Plant

    Inert C&D Materials

    suitable for Recycling

    Recycled

    Aggregates

    Sieving Crusher

    Recycling Plant

    Source :CEDD

  • C & D Waste Sorting Facility

    >250 mm 150-250 mm 150-50 mm

  • Extension of SENT Landfill

    To handle :

    Wastes that cannot be incinerated, e.g. construction waste

    Possible C&D waste recycling

    facility ???

  • Properties of Recycled Aggregates

    40 mm 20 mm 10 mm 5 mm down

    Min. dry particle density (kg/cu.m.) 2350 - 2550 2450 - 2600 2450 - 2600 2450 - 2600 2000

    Max. water absorption (%) 3.1 - 4.9 1.0 - 4.9 1.4 - 2.6 N/A 10

    Max. content of wood and other material

    less dense than water (%)0 0 0 0 0.5

    Max. content of other foreign materials (%) 0 0 0 0 1

    Max. content of fine (%) 0 - 0.3 0.1 - 0.7 1.0 - 3.0 N/A 4

    Max. content of sand (

  • Source: CEDD

  • Use of Recycled Aggregates in

    Concrete in Hong Kong Wetland Park

    15,000 m3 RAC used in

    pile caps, ground slabs,

    external works, mass

    concrete etc

  • Recycled Aggregates for Concrete : Limitations High water absorption (in particular, the recycled fines)

    presence of contaminants and other foreign materials

    Compressive strength, tensile strength and bond

    strength of concrete would be reduced

    Drying shrinkage is higher and the creep of concrete

    may increase.

    Acceptance for structural concrete application is low

  • Recycled aggregates

  • Impurities

  • Eco-blocks

    Alternative casting : Pre-cast bricks and

    blocks (dry mixed)

    Use with waste glass to enhance aesthetics and water absorption

    properties

    Use with photo-catalyst for valued added properties

  • Experiment conducted at PolyU

    Steel moulds for

    fabrication of blocks Hand compaction of the

    wet mixed materials

    After hand compaction, the

    compression was carried out

    using a compression machine

    at a rate of 600 kN/min twice Manufacturing process in industry

    The mixer

    Block manufactured

    The ingredients were

    mixed in the mixer

  • Hong Kong : in 2009 About 300 tonnes per day; about 1% recycled 99% landfilled

    Waste Glass

  • Factory made blocks

  • Air Pollutant Removal Paving Blocks

    Eco-blocks - 3rd

    Generation

    Sunlight

    Surface layer

    Cement +Recycled Glass +

    Recycled Aggregate + Photo-catalyst

    Base layer

    Cement + Recycled Aggregate +

    Recycled Glass

    Air Pollutants (NOx) Precipitation

    NO3 TiO2

  • Eco-Blocks

    Recycled Aggregate Recycled Aggregate + Recycled Glass

    Recycled Glass + Recycled

    Aggregate + Photo-catalyst

  • Examples of field applications

  • 5

    What can we do with the problems?

    Recommendations

    1. Avoid waste generation

    2. Minimize waste Generation

    Better design and construction methods

    Change of work practices etc

    3. Reuse/Recycle the material

    AVOID

    MINIMISE

    REUSE/RECYCLE

    DISPOSAL

  • Extension of SENT Landfill

    To handle :

    Wastes that cannot be

    incinerated, e.g. construction

    waste

    Possible C&D waste recycling

    facility ???

  • BEAM Plus

    Materials Aspects

    Prof. C.S. Poon

    (BEAM Faculty / MA panel Chair)

  • Materials Aspects NB EB

    No. of Prerequisites 4 2

    No. of Credits 22 11

    No. of Bonus 1 2

    Credit Summary for NB:

    Ma P1 Timber Used for Temporary Works

    Ma P2 Use of Non-CFC Based Refrigerants

    Ma P3 Construction / Demolition Waste

    Management Plan

    Ma P4 Waste Recycle Facilities

    Ma 1 Building Reuse

    Ma 2 Modular and Standardized Design

    Ma 3 Prefabrication

    Ma 4 Adaptability and Deconstruction

    Ma 5 Rapidly Renewable Materials

    Ma 6 Sustainable Forest Products

    Ma 7 Recycled Materials

    Ma 8 Ozone Depleting Substances

    Ma 9 Regionally Manufactured Materials

    Ma 10 Demolition Waste Reduction

    Ma 11 Construction Waste Reduction

    Credit Summary for EB:

    Ma P1 Use of Non-CFC Based Refrigerants

    Ma P2 Waste Recycling Facilities

    Ma 1 Building Reuse

    Ma 2 Modular and Standardized Design

    Ma 3 Adaptability and Deconstruction

    Ma 4 Rapidly Renewable Materials

    Ma 5 Sustainable Forest Products

    Ma 6 Ozone Depleting Substances

    Ma 7 Waste Management

    BEAM Plus

    Materials Aspects

  • Requirement:

    It is required to implement with proof of documentation a waste management system providing

    for the sorting, recycling and proper disposal of inert and non-inert construction / demolition

    materials.

    Ma P3 Construction and Demolition Waste Management Plan Prerequisite

    Objective:

    Encourage best practices in the management of construction and demolition wastes, including

    sorting, recycling and disposal of construction waste.

    BEAM Plus

    NB Ma P3

  • Requirement:

    1 credit for demonstrating that at least 30% of demolition waste is recycled.

    2 credits for demonstrating that at least 60%.

    NB Ma 10 Demolition Waste Reduction 2 credits

    Exclusion:

    Project where demolition is not required or is not under the Clients control.

    Remark:

    Disposal of inert waste to public fill will NOT be considered.

    Objective:

    Encourage best practices in the management of waste, including sorting, recycling and disposal of

    demolition waste.

    BEAM Plus

    NB Ma 10

  • Requirement:

    1 credit for use of recycled materials contributing to at least 10% of all materials used in site

    exterior surfacing work, structures and features.

    1 credit where at least 10% of all building materials used for faade and structural components are

    recycled materials.

    1 credit where at least 10% of all building materials used for interior non-structural components are

    recycled materials.

    NB Ma 7 Recycled Materials 3 credits

    Objective:

    Promote use of recycled materials in order to reduce the consumption of virgin resources.

    Remark:

    The unit shall be mass/volume/dollar value.

    Exclusions:

    None.

    BEAM Plus

    NB Ma 7

  • Prof. C.S. Poon

    Dept of Civil and Structural Engineering

    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    Tel : (852) 2766-6024

    Email : [email protected]

    Thank You