sustainable support for renewable energy: an alternative energy perspective tom briggs, vp policy...
TRANSCRIPT
Sustainable Support for Renewable Energy: an alternative energy perspective
Tom Briggs, VP Policy & Communications, BP Alternative Energy
22
Alternative energy: the market today
Grossed-up estimate based on disclosed deals. New investment only. Source: New Energy Finance
Global new investment in clean energy
20070
25
50
75
100
125
$28.6bn
2004
$54.6bn
2005
$86.5bn
2006
$148.4bn
$b
n
150
3
Principles for transitional incentives
• Goal: “accelerate the deployment of low-carbon power technologies”
• Policy understood to be ‘transitional’ – eventually phased down and replaced with a carbon-based measure
• Policy based around a market mechanism, e.g. tradable certificate system – to seek out lowest-cost solutions and to allow business to optimise across a wider playing field
• Policy provides encouragement tailored to each technology without ‘picking winners’ for favored treatment
4
Priorities to stimulate investment
• Enduring carbon pricing policies eg continuance of CDM, cap and trade in US and EU
• Stability and predictability in transitional incentives - long-term policies – avoiding stop-go syndrome
• Further tailoring of incentives to technologies
• Regulatory support for Grid expansion and development, including
streamlined planning permission.
• Reduce barriers to global trade and investment
5
Historical cost development and learning rates
1
10
100
1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000
• Capital cost; 2004 USD/W
• Cumulative capacity installed
• MW
• Solar PV1975 – 2003
• Solar Thermal1985 – 1991
• Wind Power1981 – 2001
− Historical learning rates per doubled cumulative capacity of
− 23% for Solar PV*
− 13% for Wind Power
− 15% for Ethanol
− 6% for PV inverters
− 3% for Solar Thermal
Source:UC Berkeley Energy Resource Group; Navigant consulting
• Ethanol1978 – 1996
• PV inverter
• 1995 – 2002
“By the year 2010 we'll be able to halve generation costs. By 2020 we expect a further reduction – half of 2010 – and by 2030 we expect half the 2020 level.”
Katsuhiko MachidaPresident, Sharp Corp
6
BP Alternative Energy
• In 2008, BP AE will invest $1.5 billion in renewable energy technologies and projects.
• In BP Alternative Energy, ~$800 million has been invested in wind energy projects to date. Two-thirds of the 2008 wind investment spend is in the US
• By end of 2008, we expect to have 1000MW wind capacity installed
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Wind Thermal Solar Biofuels Venturing Hydrogen DistributedEnergy
S AmericaUSAsia & Middle EastEurope
200
8 in
vestm
en
t sp
en
d (
$m
)
2008 Alternative Energy investment spend by region
7
BP Alternative Energy: where we operate
Investing $1.5bn in 2008
Solar PV facility / market
Wind power
Hydrogen power
Biofuels facility / market
Gas fired power
8
• Texas produces and consumes more electricity than any other state:
− 9.8% share of US total net electricity generation
− 11th in the world in terms of consumption
• Approximately 50% of electricity produced by gas-fired power plants
• Texas is the largest wind energy producer in the US
• 78.5% of Texas’ renewable generation is from wind
Overview of Texas electricity market
50.5%
47.2%
38.0%
0.6% 4.5%7.3%
Petroleum-firedNatural gas-firedCoal-firedNuclearHydroelectricOther renewable
Source: EIA August 2008
Texas electricity generation mix
7.8%10.6%
78.5%
0.5%2.6%
Hydro conventional
Wind
Wood/wood waste
Landfill gas
Biomass
Texas renewable generation mix
9
The growth of wind power in Texas
0100020003000400050006000700080009000
10000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009est.
Growth of renewable energy capacity in Texas
Capaci
ty (
MW
)
• As a result of incentives and competitive market forces, Texas has seen an explosion in investment in generation facilities, particularly wind.
• As of 1Q 2008, Texas has installed over 5,300 MW of wind capacity – more than any other state.
• ERCOT predicts that as much as 10,000 MW could be operating by spring 2009.
• The growth surge has been driven by:
− high natural gas prices
− excellent wind resources
− relatively few planning permission issues
− viable retail and wholesale markets in which to sell energy
− favourable transmission policies
− Federal tax credits and Texas Renewable Portfolio Standards
10
Transmission plays a key role in promoting the growth of renewable energy
• Within ERCOT, there is no multi-state licensing and permitting that can often delay project development
• No limit to interconnection and a standard interconnection agreement – “plug and play”
• Within ERCOT, all transmission costs are spread among customers within the region
• The PUC is building transmission to the windiest areas in Texas - Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZ)
• The “Wild West of Open Access”
From the perspective of network upgrade needs, there are generally 4 sets of potential CREZs:
COASTAL
PANHANDLE
MCCAMEYAREA
ABILENEAREA
11
Transmission CREZs in Texas
• TX PUC approved Competitive Renewable Energy Zones that will be able to accommodate 18,456 MW of renewable energy by 2017
• PUC selected the lowest cost scenario, estimating total transmission cost at $4.93 bn. Does not include .8 billion in estimated generator connection costs.
• PUC estimated savings of $38 per MWH relative to other scenarios.
• Study found that 23% wind penetration could be managed reliably by ERCOT.
• The impact of the decision is significant: Wind developers have confidence that grid capacity and operations will not be a barrier to development.
12
Conclusion
• TX PUC decision on Grid development provides a useful example of how regulators can support renewable energy.
• However, one reason this approach may work in Texas is due to the relative ease of building transmission lines.
• Approach may not be possible in other jurisdictions.
13
Additional Slides
14
Texas electricity market structure
• Texas spans four regional power grids
• 85% of usage occurring in the Electric Reliability Council Of Texas (ERCOT) grid
• ERCOT lies solely within the state so the production and sale of electricity is not subject to regulation by the FERC
• Market and utility restructuring began in 2001, with implementation of Texas Senate Bill 7
• Transmission, generation and competitive retailers were unbundled into separate market segments
15
Electricity market structure in ERCOT
Generation companies
Transmission & distribution
utility
Retailelectricityproviders
End user
REP
REP
REP
• Market prices subject to ERCOT-ISO and PUC rules
• Regulated by the PUC • Open access
• Unregulated rates
16
Texas wholesale electricity pricing history
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
$/
MW
h
Average all-in price for electricity in ERCOT
2003-2007
Natu
ral g
as p
rice (
$/M
Mb
tu)
Ancillary servicesUpliftEnergyNatural gas price
Source:2007 State of the market report for the ERCOT wholesale electricity markets
17
The retail electricity market in Texas
• Most Texas residents have a choice in their Retail Electricity Provider (REP)
• There are a proliferation of consumer offerings for all types of customer (industrial, commercial and residential)
• Prior to restructuring, only a fraction of such offerings existed
Some of the REPs serving Houston
18
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028
Transition incentives are needed for new technology
Longer term CO2 price driven by economics of supply and demand, and fiscal regime
*Solar costs reflect combination of rooftop PV and CSP costs, weighted average across regions. Wind cost is onshore weighted average across regions
• Solar
• CO2 price
• $/t
• Year
• Wind
• Carbon price
• Where cost of abatement technology is greater than the carbon price, there is a need for transition incentives to drive investment
• Carbon price “funnel”
19
Incentives can accelerate maturity
R&D
Demo.
Commercialisation
Capital-based
Production-based (MWh)
TRANSITIONAL INCENTIVES
CARBON PRICING (CO2 tonnes)
Time
+ tradinge.g. capital grants, inv tax credits
e.g. feed-in-tariffs, prod tax credits
e.g. RO, RPS
Cap-and-trade programs, carbon taxes
H2 power with CCS
Solar PV
Onshore wind
Gas power
Tech Cost
Offshore wind
Deployment
Solar nano
20
Transmission constraints in Texas
• Large distances between wind resources and load centres
• The grid is increasingly congested.
− The PUC is reviewing the move to a nodal marketplace from a zonal one
− New transmission infrastructure is being added
West
South
North
Houston
Northeast
CommerciallySignificantConstraint (CSC)
Zonal market Nodal market