sustainability in packaging
DESCRIPTION
Document presentingTRANSCRIPT
Sustainability in Packaging
Montserrat Cas+llo Owner & Consultant at RepaQ Packaging Consul+ng
+34629310468 [email protected]
CONTENTS
SUSTAINABILITY & PACKAGING LEGAL SITUATION: Considera6ons on Direc6ve 94/62/CE IDENTIFICATION OF “HOT POINTS” ON PACKAGING SUPPLY CHAIN Analizing packaging func+onality SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION / INNOVATION (3R) Material category purchasing management Material Re-‐engineering Process Re-‐engineering Eco design
1
PACKAGING AND SUSTAINABILITY
SUSTAINABILITY: "Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future genera+ons to meet their own needs. It contains within it two key concepts:the concept of 'needs', in par+cular the essen+al needs of the world's poor, to which overriding priority should be given; and the idea of limita+ons imposed by the state of technology and social organiza+on on the environment's ability to meet present and future needs." Our Common Future, Brundtland Comission 1987
PACKAGING: Packaging is defined in the regula+ons as "all products made of
any materials of any nature to be used for the containment, protec+on, handling, delivery and preserva+on of goods from the producer to the user or consumer."
2
… but once packaging performes its func6on, then it becomes waste
3
SUSTAINABILITY OBJECTIVE: ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT & BUSINESS
STRATEGY
4
EXCESS PACKAGING
Think about… cost of packaging vs cost of product throughing out waste packaging
5
OVER PACKAGING
Think about… cost of air transport?
6
NON FUNCTIONAL PACKAGING
Think about… easy open? Or frustating? a good buy, add value? Repeat it, promote repeat
purchase?
7
PACKAGING FEATURES An ESSENTIAL element to CONTAIN PROTECT PRESENT
the manufactured/commercialized product And to MINIMIZE the “a`er use” waste
Sustainable/Responsible Packaging is optimized to reach 100% features
8
CONTENTS
SUSTAINABILITY & PACKAGING LEGAL SITUATION: Considera;ons on Direc;ve 94/62/CE IDENTIFICATION OF “HOT POINTS” ON PACKAGING SUPPLY CHAIN Analizing packaging func+onality SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION / INNOVATION (3R) Material category purchasing management Material Re-‐engineering Process Re-‐engineering Eco design
9
PACKAGING WASTE: EUROPEAN LEGISLATION
• DIRECTIVE 94/62/CE for PACKAGING AND PACKAGING WASTE • DIRECTIVE 2004/12/CE (modifica6on of 94/62/CE) • DIRECTIVE 2005/20/CE (modifica6on of 94/62/CE) • COMISSION DECISION:
– 97/129/CE (Material iden+fica+on) – 2005/270/CE (Data base) – 97/622/CEE (report D 91/692) – 2005/270/CE (raw material on plas+c transport elements) – 2005/270/CE (raw material on glass packaging)
10
OBJECTIVES OF EUROPEAN PACKAGING DIRECTIVE
11
The Member States must introduce systems for the return and/or collection of used packaging to attain the following targets: Ø by no later than 30 June 2001, between 50 and 65% by weight of packaging waste to be recovered or incinerated at waste incineration plants with energy recovery; Ø by no later than 31 December 2008, at least 60% by weight of packaging waste to be recovered or incinerated at waste incineration plants with energy recovery; Ø by no later than 30 June 2001, between 25 and 45% by weight of the totality of packaging materials contained in packaging waste to be recycled (with a minimum of 15% by weight for each packaging material); Ø by no later than 31 December 2008, between 55 and 80% by weight of packaging waste to be recycled; Ø no later than 31 December 2008 the following targets for materials contained in packaging waste must be attained:60% for glass, paper and board;50% for metals;22.5% for plastics and;15% for wood.
TRANSPOSITION OF EUROPEAN PACKAGING DIRECTIVE
12
Austria Packaging Ordinance of 1992, amended 29th November 1996 Target Ordinance (Federal Law Gazette No. 646/1992, as amended by 649/1996)
Belgium The Ecotax-Act (ordinary Law of 16th July 1993 aiming at completing the federal structure of the State) Interregional Co-operation agreement Packaging Decree of 30th of May 1996 (came into effect on 5th March 1997) Law of 21st December 1998 (essential requirements) The Royal Decree of the 25th of March 1999 defining standards for packaging.
Denmark Statutory Order no. 298 of 30 April 1997 on certain requirements for packaging Statutory Order no. 299 of 30 April 1997 on waste Statutory Order no. 124 of February 27, 1989 on packaging for beer and soft drinks as amended by statutory order no. 540 of 1991 and no. 583 of 1996 and no. 300 of 30 April 1997
Finland Decision of Council of State on Packaging and Packaging Waste 1997 Law on Alcohol Excise, No. 1471 of 29th December 1994 Law on Soft Drinks Excise, No. 1474 of 29th December 1994
France Lalonde Decree N° 92-377 of April 1 1992, in force since January 1993, setting out conditions for the collection and the recovery of packaging waste produced in households. Decree N° 94-609 of 13 July 1994 on packaging waste for which the holders are not households. Decree N° 96-1008 on the disposal of household waste which contains the quotas set by the European Packaging Directive Decree N° 98-638 of 20 July 1998 related to the environmental requirements in the design and manufacture of packaging
Germany Packaging Ordinance of 1991, amended 21st of August 1998
Greece Draft Law "Measures and conditions for the alternative management of packaging and other waste products. Foundation of the National Organisation for the Alternative Management of Packaging and Other Waste (NOAMPOW)"
Ireland Waste Management (Packaging) Regulations 1997 Waste Management (Farm Plastics) Regulations 1997 Waste Management (Packaging Amendment) Regulations 1998 Source:
European Commission DGXI.E.3 European Packaging Waste Management Systems Final Report February 2001
TRANSPOSITION OF EUROPEAN PACKAGING DIRECTIVE
13
Italy "Ronchi Decree", Law effective from 5th Feb. 1997 implementing EC Directives (Directive on waste, hazardous waste and packaging waste)
amended 28th Nov. 1997
Luxembourg Grand Ducal Regulation of 31st October 1998
Portugal Decree-Law No. 366-A/97 of 20th December 1997 (modified by Decree-Law N° 162/2000 of 27th July 2000) Ordinance N° 29-B/98 of January 1998 The Decree-Law N° 407/98 of 21 December 1998 for essential requirements and maximal concentration of heavy metal
Spain Packaging Law 11/1997 of 24th April 1997 Royal Decree 782/98 of 30th April 1998 Law 10/1998 of April 21st 1998 Order 50/1998 of 30th December 1998
Sweden Decree (1997 - 185) on producer responsibility for packaging.
TheNetherlands Packaging and Packaging Waste Decree of July 4th 1997 Packaging Covenant II of 26 December 1997
UK Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 1997 Packaging Regulation (1998) Packaging (Essential Requirements) Regulations 1998 Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1999
Source: European Commission DGXI.E.3 European Packaging Waste Management Systems Final Report February 2001
BUSSINESS PREVENTION PLAN • What is it? Organiza6on commitment to reduce and improve quality of
packaging waste. • What is for? The main objec6ve is to minimize amount of packaging waste
• Who? Economic operators must plan and implement a bussiness preven6on plan if they place into market more than: MATERIAL Tm. /year Glass 250 Steel 50 Aluminium 30 Plas6c 21 Wood 16 Cartonboard 14 Other 350
14
BUSSINESS PREVENTION PLAN GOAL MEASURE INDICATOR/CONTROL
15
CONTENTS
SUSTAINABILITY & PACKAGING LEGAL SITUATION: Considera6ons on Direc6ve 94/62/CE IDENTIFICATION OF “HOT POINTS” ON PACKAGING SUPPLY CHAIN Analizing packaging func6onality SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION / INNOVATION (3R) Material category purchasing management Material Re-‐engineering Process Re-‐engineering Eco design
16
CPP ANALYSIS
Analysis of packaging func+onality enables to:
– Define/Design packaging adapted to its Contain, Protect, Present requirements
– Grade of achievement of CPP requirements for already exis+ng packaging
DEFINE OBJECTIVES
17
CPP ANALYSIS
CONTAIN Packing facility
PROTECT Transport
PRESENT Retail / Final customer
X => X X X X
X X
=> => X X
X X
X
18
CPP DATA MANAGEMENT <= PRO
DUCT
S CONTENT PROTECT PRESENT
Material 1ari
Process
… Packing Transport Acond. … Waste Lineal …
M1
M2
M3..
P1 P2…
… E1 E2 E3 T1
T2
T3
C1 C2 … PAP
PL VID
PD1
PD2
…
19
STEPS FOR CPP ANALYSIS
1.-‐ Data compila+on 2.-‐ Data management Indicator parameter-‐s defini+on.
3.-‐ CPP data matrix 4.-‐ Conclusion Iden+fica+on of improvement items
20
STEP1: EXAMPLE OF CPP ANALYSIS
21
STEP2,3: EXAMPLE OF CPP ANALYSIS
22
STEP2,3: EXAMPLE OF CPP ANALYSIS
23
STEP4: CONCLUSIONS OF CPP ANALYSIS • OPTIMIZATION of PRODUCT – MATERIAL – PROCESS
CONCLUSION IMPROVEMENT BY Product vs Material => OK => Alterna+ve supplier-‐s / Category Purchasing Management
=> KO => Material re-‐engineering, alterna+ve material Material vs Process => OK => ✓
=> KO => Material re-‐engineering, alterna+ve material for produc+vity improvement Process re-‐engineering
24
CONTENTS
SUSTAINABILITY & PACKAGING LEGAL SITUATION: Considera6ons on Direc6ve 94/62/CE IDENTIFICATION OF “HOT POINTS” ON PACKAGING SUPPLY CHAIN Analizing packaging func+onality SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION / INNOVATION (3R) Material category purchasing management Material Re-‐engineering Process Re-‐engineering Eco design
25
CASE STUDY 1: NON FUNCTIONAL PACKING
26
• Clima+c condi+ons (RH, T…) • Palle+za+on Plan (cross, ver+cal stacked) • Palle+za+on Height • Load characteris+cs (self suppor+ng, fragile…) • Distribu+on cycle • Transport type (truck, ship, plane…) • Transport box format and dimensions • Maximum Sta+c Load Resistance • ….
PACKING OPTIMIZATION: STRUCTURAL DESIGN GUIDE
Safety factor => BCT, ECT 27
28
# of referencesDe
Composition ECT (kN/m)
309269 BFB 111B 3 0,34% -15,35%
309271 B110P95B110 3 0,50% -3,67%
309272 B110P95B110 3 0,06% -3,67%
309282 B4-SQ3-B4 3 0,14% -3,67%
309287 B120P100B120 3 0,20% -3,67%309288 B100F100B100 3 0,03% -3,67%309945 BFB 3 0,03% -3,67%313046 BFB 3 0,06% -6,59%313458 BFB 3 0,06% -15,35%309375 BFB 3 0,06% -3,67%312968 BFB 3 0,06% 17,05%312877 BB130F100B100 3 0,09% -6,59%313394 BBFB 3 0,14% 8,01%312617 BBFB 3 0,14% 17,05%312755 BB125F95B110 3 0,22% -6,59%313047 BB130F100B100 3 0,34% 8,01%311459 TB160SQ150T180 3 0,39% 17,05%313288 BBFB 3 0,67% 8,01%310036 BB130F100B100 3 0,84% -3,67%312846 BB130F100B100 3 1,21% 17,05%313589 BFB 3 1,68% -6,59%309380 BFB 3 1,68% -3,67%310978 BB130F100B100 3 1,99% 8,01%311069 BB130F100B100 3 1,99% 17,05%312865 B100F100B100 3 3,06% -6,59%313376 B100F100B100 3 5,64% 5,09%311753 B100F100B100 3 5,64% 5,09%313534 BBFBB 3 6,73% -6,59%309378 BBFBB 3 6,73% -3,67%313640 BBFB 3 0,50% 8,01%313367 BB130F100B100 3 0,08% 2,17%313367 B110F95B110 3 0,48% -15,35%313367 BB125F105B110 3 1,40% -15,35%311658 B130F100B130 4 0,21% -9,97%313648 B130F100B130 4 0,34% -3,47%311749 B130F100B130 4 0,34% 0,28%313137 KBFK 4 0,34% 0,28%311752 KBFK 4 0,67% 0,28%309268 T7M6T7 4 1,07% 2,53%309267 T7M6T7 4 3,22% 2,53%312687 T7M6T7 4 13,48% 7,53%310118 KB5-P4-B4 5 0,06% 3,36%313367 KB140S130T170 5 0,23% 0,10%313457 KB5-P4-B4 5 0,31% 0,10%312956 KB5-P4-B4 5 0,31% 0,60%309289 KB5-P4-B4 5 0,31% 0,35%309275 BTE8-P4-BET8 5 0,35% 7,87%311368 TB160SQ150T180 5 0,39% -4,67%313588 TB160SQ150T180 5 0,84% -0,91%309276 BET8-P4-BET8 5 1,11% -3,16%313441 KB140F100B100 5 1,21% 5,36%310217 KB5-P4-B4 5 1,40% -7,18%310308 KB5-P4-B4 5 1,40% 5,36%313415 KB5-P4-B4 5 13,48% -7,18%309284 T8SQ8T7 6 0,50% -8,51%312526 1
2 T8SQ8T7 6 1,29% -2,13%
312596 6 8,87% -10,64%311661 K7-SQ5-K7 8 0,73% 4,26%311662 K7-SQ5-K7 8 0,20% 17,02%311446 K7-SQ5-K7 8 2,08% 2,13%311537 K7-SQ5-K7 8 2,08% -2,13%
D % coste medio/m2
% Volum anual
29
PACKING PURCHASING
30
• Material Category Defini+on Material Category is defined as a group of references suitable for a
common management. They use to share material quality, manufacturing process, supplier, market…
• Nego+a+on for each Material Category • I.e. Nego+a+on of corrugated transport box in terms of ECT,
process, prin+ng, volum… => change from purchasing boxes to purchasing different quality
corrugated carton sheet => cri+cal factor for purchasing: cost/m2
MATERIAL CATEGORY MANAGEMENT FOR PURCHASING
31
CASE STUDY 2: PACKAGING MATERIAL RE-ENGINEERING
• CPP Analysis => Significant impact in refrigera+on process – Product: 200g dairy desert – Primary packaging: PP container + lid – Secondary packaging: corrugated carton box for 12 units
• Suitability analysis: – Product vs 2nd Pack => OK, composi+on is adjusted to required BCT – 2nd Pack vs Refrigera+on Process => KO (theoric 5s => 2ºC, actually 10s =>
5ºC)
Op+miza+on of refrigera+on channel formed in the box
32
48mm 103mm
57,5 40
25mm 40mm
50mm
INITIAL (350x180x125mm)
REFRIGERATION HOLES: Dimensions: 40xh20mm Posi+on: according to plan
57,5 40 57,5
2xformatge fresc 1,8 Kg 6xiogurt500g
RE-ENGINEERING OF PACKAGING MATERIAL
48mm 98mm
76
78mm
40mm
Alterna+ve 1 (350x180x125mm)
40
2xformatge fresc 1,8 Kg 6xiogurt500g
Alternta+ve 2 (292x196x125mm)
60
REFRIGERATION HOLES: Dimensions: 40xh20mm Posi+on: according to plan
RE-ENGINEERING OF PACKAGING MATERIAL
CASE STUDY 3: PROCESS & MATERIAL RE-ENGINEERING
• CPP Analysis => Significant impact in pasteuriza+on process – Product: cooked meat product (barbacued ribs) – Primary packaging: PA/PE film for thermoforming – Secondary packaging: folding carton + corrugated carton transport box
• Suitability analysis: – Product vs 1st Pack => OK – 1st Pack vs Process => OK for pasteuriza+on, KO for steriliza+on
Thermal process op+miza+on, changing to suitable material for new
process condi+ons
35
36
PROCESS & MATERIAL RE-ENGINEERING
PROGRAMA 10
FASE:6 TIEMPO: 2h 55 min TIEMPO Tª PRESION
25 90 750 140 90 750 2 70 500 2 50 400 2 45 300 4 40 0
PROGRAMA 11
FASE: 6 TIEMPO: 57 min TIEMPO Tª PRESION
35 110 900 10 110 900 2 90 700 2 70 500 3 50 300 5 40 0
Film PA/PE Film PP/PA/PE
37
CASE STUDY 4: PACKAGING PROCESS RE-ENGINEERING
• Product: Mayonnaise 900g • Primary packaging: PP bucket 1200cc + flexible lid + rigid lid • Packaging system: fill+ seal+ close 25 env/min
38
PACKAGING PROCESS RE-ENGINEERING
Product: Maionesa 900g Primary packaging: flexible film for stand up pouch Packaging system: FFS 300 env/min
39
ECO-EFFICIENCY Reduce / Recycle / Re-‐use => Minimiza+on of waste on the way to the
Sustainable packaging
40
REDUCE BY DIMENSIONAL OPTIMIZATION
• Kr/Kp op+miza+on, minimiza+on of free space
Applica+on example:
• 8% less material +bigger savings in added components of the supply chain => reduction of air space in the inner bag => reduction of the packaging size without decreasing the amount of food • The new compact packaging also allows for more efficient use of retailer space and enables retailers to [fit] a wider variety of products [on store shelves]
41
RE-USE, RECYCLE
Product: 100% natural – no preserva+ves Packaging materials:
PET – 60% recycled PLA -‐ compostable
42
ECO-DESIGN What is eco-‐design?
Eco-‐design means considering Environment as one more factor when developing or re-‐designing some product
.
The objec6ve of eco-‐design is to minimize environmental impact in the whole Life Cycle of the developing product.
Product design
Environment Ergonomics
Quality
Safety Func+onality
Cost
Ste+cs
43
ECODESIGN AND LIFE CYCLE
44
LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS
45
ECO-DESIGN
Source: Tuboplast Hispania 46
ECODESIGN
Source: Tuboplast Hispania
• Raw material consump+on reduc+on (33%) • Increasing produc+vity (40% reduc+on forma+on cycle +me) • Energy consump+on reduc+on (38%) • Waste reduc+on (12%) 47
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!!
Montserrat Cas+llo Owner & Consultant at RepaQ Packaging Consul+ng
+34629310468 [email protected]
www.montsecas+llo.com / www.repaq.es Linkedin: hxp://es.linkedin.com/in/montsecas+llo
Twixer: hxps://twixer.com/montsecas+llom