supreme court health care law
TRANSCRIPT
7/28/2019 Supreme Court Health Care Law
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/supreme-court-health-care-law 1/9
Supreme Court Health CareThe Health Care Law
Business Law Tuesday, April 17, 2012
7/28/2019 Supreme Court Health Care Law
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/supreme-court-health-care-law 2/9
Table of Contents
FACTS OF THE CASE
3
Overview and Key Components of the Law
3
Federal Government Individual Mandate to Enact Health
Care Law 4
LEGAL ISSUES5
Commerce Clause vs. Affordable Health Care Act
5
Violate Freedom of Choice?
5
OPINION AND LEAGAL STANDING
6
APPENDIX
7
BIBLIOGRAPHY
8
2
7/28/2019 Supreme Court Health Care Law
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/supreme-court-health-care-law 3/9
FACTS OF THE CASE
Overview and Key Features of the Law
On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed the comprehensive
health reform, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, into law.
The law sets in place comprehensive health insurance reforms or
amendments that will roll out over the next four years and beyond, with
majority of the changes taken place by 2014. Key components of the
law are very specific (see Figure 1) to improve health the health care
delivery system. The health care law aims to improve the current
health care system by increasing access to health coverage for
Americans, controlling health care costs, and it introduces new
consumer protection for people who have health insurance.
Based on healthcare.gov, the most important parts of the law can
be broken down into five groups, which include:
3
7/28/2019 Supreme Court Health Care Law
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/supreme-court-health-care-law 4/9
(1)Rights and Protections: consumer protection will help those
who have insurance get the most out of their plan.
(2) Insurance Choices: providing coverage eligibility to those that
need insurance coverage or have been rejected due to a health
condition or disability.
(3) Insurance Costs: how does your health insurance policy affect
your wallet and getting the most value for your dollar.
(4)65 or Older : the health care law strengthens Medicare and
provides access to preventive services and prescription drug
discounts for seniors.
(5)Employers: tax credits and new programs are available to
small businesses to help make care more affordable for
employers, employees, and early retirees (HealthCare.gov,
2012).
4
7/28/2019 Supreme Court Health Care Law
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/supreme-court-health-care-law 5/9
Federal Government Individual Mandate to Enact Health Care
Law
Enacting the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in March 2010 did not
come with much applause. In fact, soon after the enactment of
the ACA, according to an article published from the Kaiser
Family Foundation, numerous lawsuits challenging various
provisions of the health care reform law were filed in the
federal courts (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2012). So much so,
that in November 2011, the United States Supreme Court
agreed to consider several of the raised issues regarding the
constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, and on March 26,
2012, the health care reform bill pushed by President Obama
went to the Supreme Court. One of the main issues being: “the
constitutionality of the individual mandate, requiring most
Americans to purchase health insurance by 2014 (2 hours of
argument on March 27)” (Healthcare Financial Management
Association, 2012).
Basically, the concern is the “individual mandate” portion of the
law requiring that most Americans purchase health insurance or be
fined, something that some find unconstitutional. The idea is that the
“individual mandate” would make health insurance like car insurance
(even thought the comparison is not quite the same) – something that
5
7/28/2019 Supreme Court Health Care Law
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/supreme-court-health-care-law 6/9
you must legally have if you decide to use a vehicle, not something that
you can decide to not opt into.
LEGAL ISSUES
Violate Freedom of Choice?
Some opponents argue that in addition to the health care law
being unconstitutional, the insurance mandate violates civil liberties,
and should be optional. But the requirements into this health system are
no different from existing programs that people accept without debate,
like Social Security. For federal tax purposes, most Americans have a
Social Security Number and pay a Social Security tax. The same applies
to other things people are required to pay for, such as driver's licenses,
taxes and Medicare. Are these programs “unconstitutional” and violate
freedom of choice? Should they also be optional? (Cheng, 2012)
Commerce Clause vs. Affordable Health Care Act
Those in favor of the health care law, mainly government
attorneys, claim that federal government power to enact individual
mandate, is within the score of the Commerce Clause of the
constitution, because if millions of Americans who choose not to buy
health insurance, affects interstate commerce. Despite those that
oppose this, there is no actual barrier in the Constitution against such a
mandate. The Commerce Clause allows Congress to "lay and collect taxes…
to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among several States," as long as they
6
7/28/2019 Supreme Court Health Care Law
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/supreme-court-health-care-law 7/9
have a rational basis. And in this case, the Congress claims they do, because they
“estimate that health care services and insurance account for 17 percent of the gross
domestic product and amount to more than $2 trillion annually." And since many
hospitals and health insurers operate on a national market, these two trillion dollars
reveal that the health care market has a significant impact on interstate commerce
(Cheng, 2012).
OPINION AND LEGAL STANDING
With all the facts laid out, I do not believe in government being
able to enact “individual mandate” to “force” citizens to get insurance
or be fined. I think they should start off as making it optional. On the
other hand I understand why the government is attempting to use the
Commerce Clause to grant police power (i.e., the power to compel
individuals to take specific action for the “public good”) to the federal
government. With life expectancy, baby boomers aging, chronic
diseases higher than ever, health care costs are extremely high, so
there definitely needs to be some sort of “control” on the situation.
Hopefully, if granted, the Affordable Act could be the monumental step
in a better health care system for the United States.
7
7/28/2019 Supreme Court Health Care Law
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/supreme-court-health-care-law 8/9
APPENDIX
Legal Issues
Opinion
8
7/28/2019 Supreme Court Health Care Law
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/supreme-court-health-care-law 9/9
Figure 1: (AARP, 2012)
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. AARP. (2012). AARP health Law Guide. Retrieved April 2012,from AARP:http://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/health/healthcare_reform/2012-01/Health-Care-Law-At-A-Glance-AARP.pdf
2. Cheng, B. (2012, April 14). A Constitutionality Checkup.Retrieved April 2012, from Silver Chips Online:http://silverchips.mbhs.edu/story/11533
3. Healthcare Financial Management Association. (2012). LegalChallenges to the Affordable Care Act. Retrieved April 2012,from Healthcare Financial Management Association:http://www.hfma.org/Templates/Print.aspx?id=24263
4. HealthCare.gov. (2012). Key Features of the Law. RetrievedApril 2012, from HealthCare.gov:http://www.healthcare.gov/law/features/index.html
5. Kaiser Family Foundation . (2012, January). Focus on HealthReform . Retrieved April 2012, from Kaiser Family Foundation:
http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/8270-2.pdf
9