supreme court cases the supreme court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may...
TRANSCRIPT
The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer.
A. Engel v. VitaleB. Miller v. California C. Gideon v. WainwrightD. Mapp v. Ohio
1
The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer.
A. B. C. Gideon v. WainwrightD.
1
In this 1833 case the Supreme Court held that the Bill of Rights only limited actions of the federal government, not the states.
A. Marbury v. MadisonB. McCulloch v. MarylandC. Barron v. BaltimoreD. Gibbons v. Ogden
2
In this 1833 case the Supreme Court held that the Bill of Rights only limited actions of the federal government, not the states.
A. B. C. Barron v. BaltimoreD.
2
The Supreme Court held that the First Amendment protects newspapers from “prior restraint”.
A. Lemon v. KurtzmanB. Near v. MinnesotaC. Zelmon v. Simmons-HarrisD. Texas v. Johnson
3
The Supreme Court held that the First Amendment protects newspapers from “prior restraint”.
A. B. Near v. MinnesotaC. D.
3
In this case the Supremes held that Congress has powers beyond those enumerated in the Constitution (“necessary and proper” clause).
A. Gibbons v. OgdenB. McCulloch v. MarylandC. Barron v. BaltimoreD. Marbury v. Madison
4
In this case the Supremes held that Congress has powers beyond those enumerated in the Constitution (“necessary and proper” clause).
A. B. McCulloch v. MarylandC. D.
4
The Supreme Court held that the 4th Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure applies to the states.
A. Mapp v. OhioB. Miller v. CaliforniaC. Miranda v. ArizonaD. Gregg v. Georgia
5
The Supreme Court held that the 4th Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure applies to the states.
A. Mapp v. OhioB. C. D.
5
The Supreme Court held that abortion is legal, as a matter of “privacy”.
A. Roth v. U.S.B. Roe v. WadeC. Webster v. Health ServicesD. Planned Parenthood v. Casey
6
The Supreme Court held that abortion is legal, as a matter of “privacy”.
A. B. Roe v. WadeC. D.
6
The Supreme Court held that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the 1st Amendment.
A. Gregg v. GeorgiaB. Gitlow v. New YorkC. NY Times v. SullivanD. Schenck v. U.S.
7
The Supreme Court held that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the 1st Amendment.
A. B. C. D. Schenck v. U.S.
7
In this case the Supreme Court held that it holds the power of judicial review and has the right to determine Constitutional meaning.
A. McCulloch v. MarylandB. Gibbons v. OgdenC. Marbury v. MadisonD. Barron v. Baltimore
8
In this case the Supreme Court held that it holds the power of judicial review and has the right to determine Constitutional meaning.
A. B. C. Marbury v. MadisonD.
8
The Supremes decision that sets guidelines for police questioning of accused persons; serves to protect people against self-incrimination.
A. Gitlow v. New YorkB. Gregg v. Georgia C. Roth v. U.S.D. Miranda v. Arizona
9
The Supremes decision that sets guidelines for police questioning of accused persons; serves to protect people against self-incrimination.
A. B. C. D. Miranda v. Arizona
9
In this case the Supreme Court held that the 1st Amendment protection of speech applies to the states as well as the federal government.
A. Gitlow v. New YorkB. NY Times v. SullivanC. NY Times v. U.S.D. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
10
In this case the Supreme Court held that the 1st Amendment protection of speech applies to the states as well as the federal government.
A. Gitlow v. New YorkB. C. D.
10
The Supremes held that burning of the American flag is protected as “symbolic speech” under the 1st Amendment.
A. Roth v. United StatesB. Miller v. CaliforniaC. Brandenburg v. OhioD. Texas v. Johnson
11
The Supremes held that burning of the American flag is protected as “symbolic speech” under the 1st Amendment.
A. B. C. D. Texas v. Johnson
11
In this case the Supreme Court held that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
A. Roth v. United StatesB. NY Times v. SullivanC. NY Times v. U.S.D. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
12
In this case the Supreme Court held that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
A. Roth v. United StatesB. C. D.
12
The Supremes held that speech is not protected if it encourages imminent lawless actions.
A. New York Times v. SullivanB. Zurcher v. Stanford DailyC. Brandenburg v. OhioD. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
13
The Supremes held that speech is not protected if it encourages imminent lawless actions.
A. B. C. Brandenburg v. OhioD.
13
In this case the Supreme Court decided to leave it to local communities to decide whether material is obscene and therefore unprotected by the 1st Amendment.
A. Miller v. CaliforniaB. NY Times v. SullivanC. Miami Herald v. TornilloD. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
14
In this case the Supreme Court decided to leave it to local communities to decide whether material is obscene and therefore unprotected by the 1st Amendment.
A. Miller v. CaliforniaB. C. D.
14
The Supremes upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty, meaning it is not “cruel and unusual punishment” under the 8th Amendment.
A. NAACP v. AlabamaB. Griswold v. ConnecticutC. Engel v. VitaleD. Gregg v. Georgia
15
The Supremes upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty, meaning it is not “cruel and unusual punishment” under the 8th Amendment.
A. B. C. D. Gregg v. Georgia
15
The Supremes held that public officials must prove “actual malice” and “reckless disregard for the truth” to win a libel suit against the press.
A. New York Times v. SullivanB. Zurcher v. Stanford DailyC. Red Lion Broadcasting v. F.C.C.D. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
16
The Supremes held that public officials must prove “actual malice” and “reckless disregard for the truth” to win a libel suit against the press.
A. New York Times v. SullivanB. C. D.
16
The Supremes held that the “no prior restraint” rule prevented the government from stopping the publishing of the “Pentagon Papers”.
A. New York Times v. United StatesB. Washington Post v. NixonC. Ellsberg v. United StatesD. New York Times v. Nixon
17
The Supremes held that the “no prior restraint” rule prevented the government from stopping the publishing of the “Pentagon Papers”.
A. New York Times v. United StatesB. C. D.
17
In this case the Supreme Court held state officials violated the 1st Amendment when it had schoolchildren recite a prayer it wrote.
A. Zelman v. Simmons-HarrisB. Engel v. VitaleC. Lemon v. KurtzmanD. Griswold v. Connecticut
18
In this case the Supreme Court held state officials violated the 1st Amendment when it had schoolchildren recite a prayer it wrote.
A. B. Engel v. VitaleC. D.
18
In this case the Supreme Court held that a state could provide families with vouchers to be used to pay tuition at religious schools.
A. Zelman v. Simmons-HarrisB. The Pope v. United States C. Lime v. KurtzmanD. Griswold v. Connecticut
19
In this case the Supreme Court held that a state could provide families with vouchers to be used to pay tuition at religious schools.
A. Zelman v. Simmons-HarrisB. C. D.
19
A. Carlin v. FCCB. FCC v. Pacifica FoundationC. &%$# v. United States
20
The Seven Words you cannot say on radio or TV
are . . . CENSORED
A. B. FCC v. Pacifica FoundationC.
20
The Seven Words you cannot say on radio or TV
are . . . CENSORED