subir sachdev
DESCRIPTION
Quantum phase transitions of ultracold atoms. Subir Sachdev. Quantum Phase Transitions Cambridge University Press (1999). Transparencies online at http://pantheon.yale.edu/~subir. E. E. g. g. Avoided level crossing which becomes sharp in the infinite volume limit: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Subir Sachdev
Quantum phase transitions of
ultracold atoms
Transparencies online at http://pantheon.yale.edu/~subir
Quantum Phase Transitions Cambridge University Press (1999)
What is a quantum phase transition ?
Non-analyticity in ground state properties as a function of some control parameter g
E
g
True level crossing:
Usually a first-order transition
E
g
Avoided level crossing which becomes sharp in the infinite
volume limit:
second-order transition
T Quantum-critical
Why study quantum phase transitions ?
ggc• Theory for a quantum system with strong correlations: describe phases on either side of gc by expanding in deviation from the quantum critical point.
~ zcg g
Important property of ground state at g=gc : temporal and spatial scale invariance;
characteristic energy scale at other values of g:
• Critical point is a novel state of matter without quasiparticle excitations
• Critical excitations control dynamics in the wide quantum-critical region at non-zero temperatures.
Outline
I. The superfluid—Mott-insulator transition
II. Mott insulator in a strong electric field.
III. Conclusions
I. The superfluid—Mott-insulator transition
S. Sachdev, K. Sengupta, and S. M. Girvin, Physical Review B 66, 075128 (2002).
I. The Superfluid-Insulator transition
†
†
Degrees of freedom: Bosons, , hopping between the
sites, , of a lattice, with short-range repulsive interactions.
- ( 1)2
j
i j jj j
ji j
j
b
b b n n
jU nH t
† j j jn b b
Boson Hubbard model
For small U/t, ground state is a superfluid BEC with
superfluid density density of bosons
M.PA. Fisher, P.B. Weichmann, G. Grinstein, and D.S. Fisher
Phys. Rev. B 40, 546 (1989).
What is the ground state for large U/t ?
Typically, the ground state remains a superfluid, but with
superfluid density density of bosons
The superfluid density evolves smoothly from large values at small U/t, to small values at large U/t, and there is no quantum phase transition at any intermediate value of U/t.(In systems with Galilean invariance and at zero temperature, superfluid density=density of bosons always, independent of the strength of the interactions)
What is the ground state for large U/t ?
Incompressible, insulating ground states, with zero superfluid density, appear at special commensurate densities
3jn tU
7 / 2jn Ground state has “density wave” order, which spontaneously breaks lattice symmetries
Excitations of the insulator: infinitely long-lived, finite energy quasiparticles and quasiholes
2
, , *,
Energy of quasi-particles/holes: 2p h p h
p h
ppm
Boson Green's function : Cross-section to add a boson while transferring energy and momentum
( , )
p
G p
Continuum of two quasiparticles +
one quasihole
,G p Z p
Quasiparticle pole
~3
Insulating ground state
Similar result for quasi-hole excitations obtained by removing a boson
Entangled states at of order unity
ggc
Quasiparticle weight Z
~ cZ g g
ggc
Superfluid density s
( 2)~ d zs cg g
gc
g
Excitation energy gap
,
,
~ for
=0 for p h c c
p h c
g g g g
g g
/g t U
A.V. Chubukov, S. Sachdev, and J.Ye, Phys. Rev. B 49, 11919 (1994)
Quasiclassical dynamics
Quasiclassical dynamics
Relaxational dynamics ("Bose molasses") with phase coherence/relaxation time given by
1 Universal number 1 K 20.9kHzBk T
S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2411 (1992).K. Damle and S. SachdevPhys. Rev. B 56, 8714 (1997).
Crossovers at nonzero temperature
2
Conductivity (in d=2) = universal functionB
Qh k T
M.P.A. Fisher, G. Girvin, and G. Grinstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 587 (1990).K. Damle and S. Sachdev Phys. Rev. B 56, 8714 (1997).
Outline
I. The superfluid—Mott-insulator transition
II. Mott insulator in a strong electric field.
III. Conclusions
II. Mott insulator in a strong electric fieldS. Sachdev, K. Sengupta, and S. M. Girvin, Physical Review B 66, 075128 (2002).
M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Nature 415, 39 (2002).
Related earlier work by C. Orzel, A.K. Tuchman, M. L. Fenselau, M. Yasuda, and M. A. Kasevich, Science 291, 2386 (2001).
Superfluid-insulator transition of 87Rb atoms in a magnetic trap and an optical lattice potential
Detection method
Trap is released and atoms expand to a distance far larger than original trap dimension
2
, exp ,0 exp ,02 2
where with = the expansion distance, and position within trap
m mmT i i iT T T
0 0
20 0
0 0
R R rRR
R = R + r, R r
In tight-binding model of lattice bosons bi ,
detection probability † 0
,
exp with i j i ji j
mb b i
T
Rq r r q
Measurement of momentum distribution function
Schematic three-dimensional interference pattern with measured absorption images taken along two orthogonal directions. The absorption images were obtained after ballistic
expansion from a lattice with a potential depth of V0 = 10 Er and a time of flight of 15 ms.
Superfluid state
Superfluid-insulator transition
V0=0Er V0=7Er V0=10Er
V0=13Er V0=14Er V0=16Er V0=20Er
V0=3Er
M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Nature 415, 39 (2002).
Applying an “electric” field to the Mott insulator
V0=10 Erecoil perturb = 2 ms
V0= 13 Erecoil perturb = 4 ms
V0= 16 Erecoil perturb = 9 ms
V0= 20 Erecoil perturb = 20 ms
What is the quantum state
here ?
† †
†
12
i j j i i i i iij i i
i i i
UH t b b b b n n n
n b b
E r
, ,U E t E U
Describe spectrum in subspace of states resonantly coupled to the Mott insulator
Effective Hamiltonian for a quasiparticle in one dimension (similar for a quasihole):
† † †eff 1 13 j j j j j j
j
H t b b b b Ejb b
Exact eigenvalues ;
Exact eigenvectors 6 /m
m j m
Em m
j J t E
All charged excitations are strongly localized in the plane perpendicular electric field.Wavefunction is periodic in time, with period h/E (Bloch oscillations)
Quasiparticles and quasiholes are not accelerated out to infinity
dk Edt
Semiclassical picture
k
Free particle is accelerated out to infinityIn a weak periodic potential, escape to infinity occurs via Zener tunneling across band gaps
Experimental situation: Strong periodic potential in which there is negligible Zener tunneling, and the
particle undergoes Bloch oscillations
Creating dipoles on nearest neighbor links creates a state with relative energy U-2E ; such states are not
part of the resonant manifold
Nearest-neighbor dipole
Important neutral excitations (in one dimension)
Nearest-neighbor dipoles
Dipoles can appear resonantly on non-nearest-neighbor links.Within resonant manifold, dipoles have infinite on-link
and nearest-link repulsion
Nearest neighbor dipole
A non-dipole state
State has energy 3(U-E) but is connected to resonant state by a matrix element smaller than t2/U
State is not part of resonant manifold
Hamiltonian for resonant dipole states (in one dimension)
†
† †
† † †1 1
Creates dipole on link
6 ( )
Constraints: 1 ; 0
d
d
H t d d U E d d
d d d d d d
Note: there is no explicit dipole hopping term.
However, dipole hopping is generated by the interplay of terms in Hd and the constraints.
Determine phase diagram of Hd as a function of (U-E)/t
Weak electric fields: (U-E) t
Ground state is dipole vacuum (Mott insulator)
† 0dFirst excited levels: single dipole states
0
Effective hopping between dipole states † 0d
† † 0md d† 0md
0
If both processes are permitted, they exactly cancel each other.The top processes is blocked when are nearest neighbors
2
A nearest-neighbor dipole hopping term ~ is generatedtU E
,m
t t
t t
Strong electric fields: (E-U) tGround state has maximal dipole number.
Two-fold degeneracy associated with Ising density wave order:† † † † † † † † † † † †1 3 5 7 9 11 2 4 6 8 10 120 0d d d d d d or d d d d d d
Ising quantum critical point at E-U=1.08 t
-1.90 -1.88 -1.86 -1.84 -1.82 -1.800.200
0.204
0.208
0.212
0.216
0.220
S /N3/4
N=8 N=10 N=12 N=14 N=16
Equal-time structure factor for Ising order
parameter
Hamiltonian for resonant states in higher dimensions
† †1, , 1, ,
,
† †,
† † † †, , , , , , , ,
, , ,,
† †, , , ,
,
6
( ) 2
2 3 H.c.
1 ; 1 ; 0
ph n n n nn
n n n nn
n m
n n n n n n n
n mnm
n
H t p h p h
U E p p h h
t h h p
p p h h p p h h
p
†,
†,
Creates quasiparticle in column and transverse position
Creates quasihole in column and transverse position n
n
p n
h n
Terms as in one dimension
Transverse hopping
Constraints
New possibility: superfluidity in transverse direction (a smectic)
Resonant states in higher dimensionsResonant states in higher dimensionsQuasiparticles
Quasiholes
Dipole states in one dimension
Quasiparticles and quasiholes can move
resonantly in the transverse directions in higher
dimensions.
Constraint: number of quasiparticles in any column = number of quasiholes in column to its left.
Ising density wave order
( ) /U E t
( ) /U E t
Transverse superfluidity
Possible phase diagrams in higher dimensions
Implications for experiments
•Observed resonant response is due to gapless spectrum near quantum critical point(s).
•Transverse superfluidity (smectic order) can be detected by looking for “Bragg lines” in momentum distribution function---bosons are phase coherent in the transverse direction.
•Present experiments are insensitive to Ising density wave order. Future experiments could introduce a phase-locked subharmonic standing wave at half the wave vector of the optical lattice---this would couple linearly to the Ising order parameter.
Conclusions
I. Study of quantum phase transitions offers a controlled and systematic method of understanding many-body systems in a region of strong entanglement.
II. Atomic gases offer many exciting opportunities to study quantum phase transitions because of ease by which system parameters can be continuously tuned.