study objectives
DESCRIPTION
Estimation of Genetic Multipliers for Douglas-Fir Height- and Diameter-Growth Models Peter J. Gould, David D. Marshall, Randy Johnson and Greg Johnson. Study Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Estimation of Genetic Multipliers for Douglas-Fir Height- and Diameter-
Growth Models
Peter J. Gould, David D. Marshall, Randy Johnson and Greg Johnson
1. Estimate growth differences between average (wood’s-run) tree and individual families in terms of genetic-gain multipliers.
2. Relate multipliers to breeding value (BV = percent gain at age 10).
3. Evaluate multipliers effects in model.
Study Objectives
Effect of Multipliers
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 20 40 60 80 100Year
Dia
met
er (i
n)Initial Size Advantage
Gain Multiplier= 0.05
Typical Tree
Coop: breeding zone. Completely independent families.
Sites: Geographical locations within coops.
NWTIC 1st-Generation Progeny Tests
Rep 1 Rep 2
Rep 3 Rep 4
Rep 1 Rep 2
Rep 3 Rep 4
Rep 1 Rep 2
Rep 3 Rep 4
SET 1 SET 2 SET 3
DBH Data: Variation between Coops
10-YR GROWTH PERIOD
DBH Data: Variation between Sites
10-YR GROWTH PERIOD
DBH Data: Variation between Sets
10-YR GROWTH PERIOD
DBH Data: Breeding Values
BV = Age 10 Gain 1 (percent)
1. Average growth = wood’s run.
2. Multipliers work with any unbiased growth model.
3. Removing sources of variation other than genetics is very important.
Modeling Strategy: Assumptions
Strategy:1. Fit models with random effects at site-set level.
2. Calculate genetic multiplier (m) for each family at coop level.
Obs = m ∙ Pred
3. Estimate m from BV.
m = A0 + A1 ∙ BV
>16 coops
> 109 sites
> 513 site-sets
> 2485 families
> 222 818 observations
10-YR Modeling Dataset: HT Model
∆HT = b1∙HTb2∙b3HT
random effects on b1,b2,b3
Fixed Effects: ∆HT = 231.7∙HT0.94∙0.86HT
HT Model 1
HT Model 1Model R2
Base 37.6
Base + random effect 69.0
Residual Variation (%) 31.0
Between Families (%) 2.4
HT Model Results: Family M
>7 coops
> 45 sites
> 193 site-sets
> 1160 families
> 76 012 observations
Modeling Datasets: DBH Model
∆DBH = b1∙DBHb2∙b3DBH∙b4BA REP
random effects on b1,b2,b3
Fixed Effects: ∆DBH = 3.7∙DBH0.3∙1.01DBH∙0.97BA REP
DBH Model 1
DBH Model 1Model R2
Base 25.5
Base + random effect 61.6
Residual Variation (%) 38.4
Between Families (%) 3.3
DBH Model Results: Family M
10-yr A1 estimates:
Study Ht Diameter
Gould 0.001434 0.001577
Marshall 0.001498 0.001657
--
R. Johnson(BV = 13%)
0.001145 --
G. Johnson(assume BV=13%)
0.001824 0?
Other Periods
• Ht data for 5-yr (167,000 obs) and 15-yr (7600 obs) growth.
• DBH data for 5-yr (7,700 obs) and 15-yr growth (20,000).
• Estimates of m are higher for 5-yr, but about the same for 15-yr growth.
What’s Next?
• Manuscript on multipliers.
• ORGANON interface.
• Test multipliers.