student orient copy

95
RDIC RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION CENTER OUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY 8 STUDENT ORIENTATION Friday, July 26, 13

Upload: ams-malicse-somoray

Post on 14-Apr-2017

415 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

RDICRESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION CENTER

O U R L A D Y O F F A T I M A U N I V E R S I T Y

8

STUDENT ORIENTATION

Friday, July 26, 13

SERVICE. STYLE.BY MICHAEL JOSEPH S. DIÑO

RESPONSIBILITY.

Friday, July 26, 13

RDICRESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION CENTER

O U R L A D Y O F F A T I M A U N I V E R S I T Y

8

SERVICE.

STYLE.

RESPONSIBILITY.

Friday, July 26, 13

RDICRESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION CENTER

O U R L A D Y O F F A T I M A U N I V E R S I T Y

8rdic personnel, research office achievements, university role

undergraduate research format

services, proposal and final defense

SERVICE.

STYLE.

RESPONSIBILITY.

Friday, July 26, 13

UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CENTERSERVICE.

Friday, July 26, 13

RDIC ORGANIZATION

Friday, July 26, 13

DIRECTOR

AST. DIRECTOR

CAMPUS COOR.

RDIC ORGANIZATION

Friday, July 26, 13

DIRECTOR

AST. DIRECTOR

CAMPUS COOR.

ETHICAL BOARD

RDIC ORGANIZATION

Friday, July 26, 13

DIRECTOR

AST. DIRECTOR

CAMPUS COOR.

ETHICAL BOARD

CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4

RDIC ORGANIZATION

Friday, July 26, 13

DIRECTOR

AST. DIRECTOR

CAMPUS COOR.

ETHICAL BOARD

CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4

COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP.

RDIC ORGANIZATION

Friday, July 26, 13

DIRECTOR

AST. DIRECTOR

CAMPUS COOR.

ETHICAL BOARD

CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4

COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP.

research analytics

research consultants

english dept.

research publication

RDIC ORGANIZATION

Friday, July 26, 13

DIRECTOR

AST. DIRECTOR

CAMPUS COOR.

ETHICAL BOARD

CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4

COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP.

FACULTY

research analytics

research consultants

english dept.

research publication

RDIC ORGANIZATION

Friday, July 26, 13

DIRECTOR

AST. DIRECTOR

CAMPUS COOR.

ETHICAL BOARD

CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4

COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP. COLLEGE REP.

FACULTY

STUDENTS

research analytics

research consultants

english dept.

research publication

RDIC ORGANIZATION

Friday, July 26, 13

6

CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2

CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4

CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4

The RDIC follows cluster-based (per college)

research management

RESEARCH CLUSTERS

Friday, July 26, 13

6

CLUSTER 1Health & Medicine

CLUSTER 2Education & Society

CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 CLUSTER 4

CLUSTER 3Business & IT

CLUSTER 4Graduate School

The RDIC follows cluster-based (per college)

research management

RESEARCH CLUSTERS

Friday, July 26, 13

7

Health & Medicine

Education & Society

CLUSTER 1

CLUSTER 2

CLUSTER 3

Business & IT

medicine.dentistry.nursing.medtech. pharmacy. physical therapy. biology

education. psychology.criminology. philosophy. physical educ. cas

business. accountancy. chim. comp-sci. technology. maritime

RESEARCH CLUSTERS

Friday, July 26, 13

RDIC OFFICE - MAIN

Friday, July 26, 13

RDIC SERVICES

Research Management

Research Consultancy

Research Analytics

Friday, July 26, 13

RDIC PUBLICATIONS

Book of Abstracts Fatima University Research Journal The OLFU Review

Friday, July 26, 13

RDIC PRESENTATIONS (1st SEM)

BS Pharma: 4 Papers23rd Pharmacy CongressSingapore, August 2013

Nursing: 3 PapersAsian Conference on educationJapan, October 2013

RDIC: 2 PaperAsian Conference on S.E.TJapan, October 2013

RDIC: 1 PaperHIMSS AsiaPac Health ITSingapore, October 2013

Friday, July 26, 13

RDICRESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION CENTER

O U R L A D Y O F F A T I M A U N I V E R S I T Y

8INFINITY SYMBOL(research)

PLANT ICON(development)

GLOBE(innovation)

LAUREL LEAF(scholarship)

RDIC LOGO

Friday, July 26, 13

STYLE.UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH FORMAT

Friday, July 26, 13

I THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Introduction

Statement of the Problem

Hypothesis of the Study

Significance of the Study

Scope and Limitation of the Study

II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

Review of Related Literature and Studies

Conceptual Framework

Research Paradigm

Definition of Terms

III METHODOLOGY

Research Design

Locale and Population of the Study

Description of the Respondents

Data Gathering, Instrumentation and

Procedures

Statistical Treatment Used

IV PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

V SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary

Findings

Conclusions

Recommendations

TRADITIONAL RESEARCH FORMAT

Friday, July 26, 13

PUBLICATION FORMAT

International Format

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Background 2.1Theoretical Framework/CF 2.2 Review of Literature 2.3 Simulacrum3.0 Method 3.1 Subjects 3.2 Tools/ Measures 3.3 Analysis

4.0 Results5.0 Discussion

6.0 Conclusion

I-M-R-A-DFORMAT

Friday, July 26, 13

PRELIMINARY PAGES

CONTENT PAGES

REFERENCES, APPENDICES

RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT

(numbered as i, ii, iii, iv)

(numbered as 1, 2, 3, 4) (continue

numbering from previous)(with header/

footer)Friday, July 26, 13

FONT AND SPACING GUIDELINES

TIMES NEW ROMAN SIZE 11All ‘regular’ except titles (BOLD), subtitle Italics, footer (CAPS)

1.5 SPACINGall areas, except appendices and table contents (single)

LETTER SIZEPaper, Header and Footer for content pages only; justified

2.5 cm

2.5 cm

2.5 cm

3.0 cm

Friday, July 26, 13

HEADER AND FOOTER

first 5 words of

title...

page number

OUR LADY OF FATIMA

UNIVERSITY COLLEGEFriday, July 26, 13

SPACING BETWEEN PARAGRAPHS3 SPACES between paragraphs and titles (or 1 keyboard enter)

3 spaces3 spaces

3 spaces

Title: BoldSubTitle: Italics

justified; table with indent

Friday, July 26, 13

PRELIMINARY PAGES

RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT - PRELIMINARIES

FIRST TITLE PAGE

CONTENTS PAGE

ENDORSEMENT PAGECERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY

Friday, July 26, 13

1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Theoretical Framework

CONTENT PAGES

2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum

3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis

4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION

RESEARCH ABSTRACTSECOND TITLE PAGE

RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT - CONTENT (QUANTI)

Friday, July 26, 13

1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Theoretical Framework

CONTENT PAGES

2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum

3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis

4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION

RESEARCH ABSTRACTSECOND TITLE PAGE

RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT - CONTENT (QUALI)

(omitted)

(Key Informat

Selection)

moderatum generalization

reflection

Friday, July 26, 13

REFERENCES, APPENDICES

REFERENCES

LIST OF APPENDICESLetters of Permission ConsentResearch Instrument(s)

Research Tally/ Interview TextResearch Plates

Research BudgetTimeline

Certifications/ EthicsCorrespondenceAuthorsAcknowledgement

SELECTED LITERATURE (MIN 10)

RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT - REF/APPENDICES

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Friday, July 26, 13

SAMPLE TEMPLATE CAN BE ACCESSED FROM YOUR RESEARCH COORDINATORS STARTING

AUGUST 1, 2013

Friday, July 26, 13

STYLE-CONTENT GUIDE.UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH FORMAT

Friday, July 26, 13

PLEASE REFER TO YOUR HANDOUT

Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: TITLE PAGE

6 spaces from top of pageTitle: boldAuthors + adviserCollegeRDICOLFU

superscripts on authors and affiliations

no header and footer for title page

Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: CONTENT

1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum

3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis

4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION

RESEARCH ABSTRACTRDIC requires a structured

abstract and allow a limited number of words, ranging from

150-250.

Abstracts must contain an (1) introductory statement that ends

with a specific aim or hypothesis, (2) methodology, (3) results and the (4) conclusion.

Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: ABSTRACTheader

footer

abstract

keywords (max 10)

Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: ABSTRACT CONTENT

With the pending issues on malnutrition and healthy illiteracy, the focus has been turned towards the potentials share of the gaming industry in attaining the elusive health-for-all across developmental stages. This paper sought to determine the system usability of a researcher-made computer game for health and test the effect of player demographics to usability and usability to the player’s intention to participate in gaming. The results showed that majority of the respondents (n=30) agreed that the game handed to them was usable (x̄=5.40; SD=0.88) and that they would play the game at the soonest time possible (x̄=1.43; SD=0.68). Regression analysis showed that player demographics is not a determinant of the player’s perception of game usability (r=0.18; p=0.82), but usability has shown to have a significant effect of the player’s intention to play the game (r=0.67; p=0.00). This paper is meritorious in providing empirical evidence of the importance of usability testing before handing down games for health to the target consumers.

Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: ABSTRACT CONTENT

With the pending issues on malnutrition and healthy illiteracy, the focus has been turned towards the potentials share of the gaming industry in attaining the elusive health-for-all across developmental stages. This paper sought to determine the system usability of a researcher-made computer game for health and test the effect of player demographics to usability and usability to the player’s intention to participate in gaming. The results showed that majority of the respondents (n=30) agreed that the game handed to them was usable (x̄=5.40; SD=0.88) and that they would play the game at the soonest time possible (x̄=1.43; SD=0.68). Regression analysis showed that player demographics is not a determinant of the player’s perception of game usability (r=0.18; p=0.82), but usability has shown to have a significant effect of the player’s intention to play the game (r=0.67; p=0.00). This paper is meritorious in providing empirical evidence of the importance of usability testing before handing down games for health to the target consumers.

Abstracts must contain an (1) introductory statement that ends with a specific aim or hypothesis, (2) methodology, (3) results

and the (4) conclusion.

Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: INTRODUCTION

1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum

3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis

4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION

RESEARCH ABSTRACT The introduction should provide justification for the study by

identifying a niche area within the existing body of knowledge. It

must also identify specific aims or hypotheses that become the

focus of the described research.

Introduction should be brief and generally limited to three or four paragraphs, and should be used

to set the stage for the study. Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: INTRO CONTENT

header

footer

1.0 Introduction(in bold)

ParagraphsT-I-P-S

Trends, Issues, Problem, Sentence of

Problematizing

Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: REVLIT

1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum

3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis

4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION

RESEARCH ABSTRACT 2.1 Theoretical Framework in S-E-C format

2.2. Should be presented thematically with proper citation (APA style), ends with research question

and hypothesis

Research simulacrum is the research paradigm

(figure)Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESEARCH METHOD

1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum

3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis

4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION

RESEARCH ABSTRACT3.1 State the approach

and design and the reason(s) why it is the

most appropriate

3.2. Describe the setting for the study and why it

was chosen

Friday, July 26, 13

1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum

3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis

4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION

RESEARCH ABSTRACT3.3 Specify sampling used (inclusion/exclusion) and the number of subjects

recruited; for human samples describe briefly;

for animals refer to standards

3.2. Describe ethical considerations

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESEARCH METHOD

Friday, July 26, 13

1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum

3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis

4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION

RESEARCH ABSTRACT3.5 Discuss content/

sections of the instrument and credibility (eg

reliability and validity), pilot testing, or

adaptation/adoptation

3.6. Data collection in detail including protocol

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESEARCH METHOD

Friday, July 26, 13

1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum

3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis

4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION

RESEARCH ABSTRACT

3.7 Describe variables measured and how

measurement was made; include statistics/analysis done, software used and

validation techniques

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESEARCH METHOD

Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESULTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum

3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis

4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION

RESEARCH ABSTRACT

Section TitlePresent TableDescribe Table

Table

Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RESULTS

Section TitlePresent TableDiscuss(dont present analysis and

implications here)

Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: DISCUSSION

1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum

3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis

4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION

RESEARCH ABSTRACT

For every section:(1) 1 sentence summary

of result, (2) possible reasons for the result

(cross ref or not), and (3) implication of the finding

with reference to previous literature

Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: CONCLUSION

1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum

3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis

4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION

RESEARCH ABSTRACT1 sentence summary of

the paper objective

1-3 sentence(s) of method used

1-3 sentence summary of finding

implication to research, practice and education

Friday, July 26, 13

MINIMUM REQUIREMENT: RECOMMENDATION

1.0 INTRODUCTION2.0 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1. Theoretical Framework2.2. Literature Review2.3. Research Simulacrum

3.0 RESEARCH METHOD3.1. Research Design3.2. Research Locale3.3. Population and Sampling3.4. Research Ethics3.5. Research Instruments3.6. Data Collection3.7. Data Analysis

4.0 RESULT(S)5.0 DISCUSSION6.0 CONCLUSION7.0 RECOMMENDATION

RESEARCH ABSTRACT

Discuss limitation of the paper and

recommendation to future researchers

Friday, July 26, 13

TO KNOW MORE ABOUT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR EACH MANUSCRIPT SECTION, PLEASE VISIT JOURNAL

REPORTING STANDARDS (JARS) AT:

http://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/jars.pdf

Friday, July 26, 13

OLFU GUIDE ON RESEARCH FORMAT

NOW ONiTunes U

Friday, July 26, 13

OPEN iTunes U application from your iOS device

Friday, July 26, 13

at the bottom of the screen, click/touch enroll

Friday, July 26, 13

an enrollment request dialogue box will pop-up

Friday, July 26, 13

enter enrollment code: DS9-7QV-NA6

Friday, July 26, 13

click/touch next

Friday, July 26, 13

a course folder will appear along with your other courses

Friday, July 26, 13

a course folder will appear along with your other courses

Friday, July 26, 13

a course folder will appear along with your other courses

GUIDE ACCESS WILL START ON AUGUST 1, 2013

Friday, July 26, 13

browse through notes and materials related to research format

Friday, July 26, 13

RESPONSIBILITY.UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AS RESEARCHERS

Friday, July 26, 13

COMPLETE YOUR PAPER WITHIN THE SEMESTER(NO EXTRA SEMESTER EXTENSION; NO GRADE OF INC)

Friday, July 26, 13

THROWBACK THURSDAY... COST OF MY PAPER

DEFENSE 1,200BIND (4) 600

STATISTICS 6,000ADVISER 400

PHP 8,200(6 in a group)

PHP 1,366

Friday, July 26, 13

DEFENSE/ PRESENTATION

DEFENSE/ PRESENTATION STUDENT FEES EXPENSES

PROPOSAL(for colleges with 2 semesters of

research subject)PHP 250/ STUDENTPHP 250/ STUDENT

ADVISER FEE (300), PANEL FEE (600), ETHICS REVIEW (100),

ENERGY (250)

FINAL DEFENSE PHP 400/ STUDENTPHP 400/ STUDENTADVISER (300), PANEL (600),

ANALYSIS (500), ENERGY (200), RESEARCH (300), BINDING (500)

6 members per group.

pay thru accounting officeFriday, July 26, 13

STANDARD FEES FOR PROPOSAL AND FINAL DEFENSE

DEFENSE/ PRESENTATION

DEFENSE/ PRESENTATION STUDENT FEES EXPENSES

PROPOSAL(for colleges with 2 semesters of

research subject)PHP 250/ STUDENTPHP 250/ STUDENT

ADVISER FEE (300), PANEL FEE (600), ETHICS REVIEW (100),

ENERGY (250)

FINAL DEFENSE PHP 400/ STUDENTPHP 400/ STUDENTADVISER (300), PANEL (600),

ANALYSIS (500), ENERGY (200), RESEARCH (300), BINDING (500)

6 members per group.

pay thru accounting officeFriday, July 26, 13

NO TOKENS SHALL BE GIVEN TO ADVISERS AND PANEL MEMBERS ON PAPER COMPLETION/DEFENSE

Friday, July 26, 13

STATISTICAL PROCEDURE

STUDENT SUBMIT TO ADVISER

ADVISER SUBMIT TO

RDIC

RESULT ENDORSE TO

ADVISER

Friday, July 26, 13

DEFENSE PROCEDURE

STUDENT SUBMIT TO ADVISER

DEFENSE SUBMIT TO ADVISER

(form, 3 copies, receipt) (student comply with changes)

(2 copies, CD softcopy)

Friday, July 26, 13

MANUSCRIPT BINDING

Friday, July 26, 13

MANUSCRIPT BINDING

Friday, July 26, 13

MANUSCRIPT BINDING

Friday, July 26, 13

MANUSCRIPT BINDING

Friday, July 26, 13

MANUSCRIPT BINDING

Friday, July 26, 13

MANUSCRIPT BINDING

Friday, July 26, 13

MANUSCRIPT BINDING

Friday, July 26, 13

MANUSCRIPT BINDING

Effects of Touch Therapy on Hospital Stress among Primiparous Patients in the Philippines

AbstractWith the pending issues on malnutrition and healthy illiteracy, the focus has been turned towards the potentials share of the gaming industry in attaining the elusive health-for-all across developmental stages. Game usability testing has yielded many positive effects for both the gaming company and the gamer, but is given little attention when it comes to games for health. This paper sought to determine the system usability of a researcher-made computer game for health and test the effect of player demographics to usability and usability to the player’s intention to participate in gaming. The results showed that majority of the respondents (n=30) agreed that the game handed to them was usable (x̄=5.40; SD=0.88) and that they would play the game at the soonest time possible (x̄=1.43; SD=0.68). Regression analysis showed that player demographics is not a determinant of the player’s perception of game usability (r=0.18; p=0.82), but usability has shown to have a significant effect of the player’s intention to play the game (r=0.67; p=0.00). This paper is meritorious in providing empirical evidence of the importance of usability testing before handing down games for health to the target consumers.

Keywords: Nutrition, Literacy, Preschool, Usability, Behavior Intention, Regression, Game Development

Juan dela Cruz, SN; Rosario dela Cruz, SN, Jenica Ana Rivero, RN, MAN

College of NursingResearch Development and Innovation CenterOur Lady of Fatima University

Friday, July 26, 13

Friday, July 26, 13

RXLFUOUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY

RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013

Friday, July 26, 13

Our Lady of Fatima University Research Exposition (OLFU-RX)Valenzuela City, Quezon City, Antipolo City

The Research Development and Innovation Center (RDIC) of the Our Lady of Fatima University recognizes the importance of research culture growth among the members of the university community through conceptualization of valuable research programs and events that will highlight and recognize scientific research products of faculty and students. In pursuant of this the, OLFU-RX was conceptualized that will serve as an annual research event of the research departments across programs and campuses starting AY 2013-2014.

RXLFUOUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY

RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013

Friday, July 26, 13

RXLFUOUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY

RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013

Friday, July 26, 13

RXLFUOUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY

RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013

✓To expose the university community to a favorable and challenging avenue for research presentation centered on friendly competition and research camaraderie across colleges and campuses✓To express recognition and reward exemplary research work and efforts of

faculty and students towards attaining sustainable research productivity and excellence✓To expound a culture of research by engaging the community in series of

worthy research activities and education sessions concurrent with the needs of the research society and responsive to the challenges brought by the dynamic research field✓To exhilarate the university community on the reward and benefits of

productive research work towards creation of scholar and honor societies of researchers

Friday, July 26, 13

RXLFUOUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY

RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013

Friday, July 26, 13

RXLFUOUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY

RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013

“Translating Research towards Innovative and Sustainable Practice”

Higher educational institutions must respond to the ever-changing needs of the industry by serving as the primordial proponent of knowledge production and refinement through research and scholarly work. By utilization of research products, innovation and sustainability are ensured.

The following are the thematic strands for the research clusters of the RDIC:

✓Cluster 1 - Health and Medicine: “Sustainable Healthcare through Evidence-Based Practice”✓Cluster 2 - Education and Society: “Exploring Best Practices in Social Sciences”✓Cluster 3 - Business&IT: “Informatics-driven Practice: Catalyst for Transformational Change”

Friday, July 26, 13

CERTIFICATES WILL BE GIVEN TO ALL STUDENT PARTICIPANTS

Friday, July 26, 13

CERTIFICATES WILL BE GIVEN TO ALL STUDENT PARTICIPANTS

special label at your binded manuscript

Friday, July 26, 13

RXLFUOUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY

RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013

Friday, July 26, 13

RXLFUOUR LADY OF FATIMA UNIVERSITY

RESEARCH EXPOSITION 2013

Oral, AV, Poster Presentations

Best College ResearchBest Cluster ResearchRicierca Award of Excellence

Best Faculty Research

Innovation/Product Award

Friday, July 26, 13

Friday, July 26, 13

DATE TIMEACTIVITIES PER CAMPUSACTIVITIES PER CAMPUSACTIVITIES PER CAMPUS

DATE TIMEValenzuela Campus QC Campus Antipolo Campus

Day 1 September 24

10:00 - 12:00Opening Ceremonies Opening Ceremonies Opening Ceremonies

1:00 - 3:00 Education Session 1Updates: Quali Research Poster Viewing and

Ribbon Cutting Session for Cluster 1

Poster Viewing and Ribbon Cutting Session for Cluster 2 and 33:00 - 5:00 Education Session 2

Multidisciplinary Research

Poster Viewing and Ribbon Cutting Session for Cluster 1

Poster Viewing and Ribbon Cutting Session for Cluster 2 and 3

Day 2September 25

9:00 - 12:00 Oral Presentation Cluster 1 Day 2September 25

9:00 - 12:00

Research Product and Innovation Presentation for Cluster 1

1:00 - 4:00 Research Product and Innovation Presentation for Cluster 1

Day 3September 26

9:00 - 12:00 Oral Presentation for Cluster 2 and 3

1:00 - 4:00 Research Product and Innovation Presentation for Cluster 2 and 3

Day 4September 27

8:00 - 9:00 Poster Viewing and Ribbon Cutting Session for Winning Entries from Clusters 1-3

9:00 - 12:00 Audio-Video Research Presentation

6:00 - 9:00 Researchers’ Night and Award CeremoniesLaunching of FURJ issue 5Launching of eJournalsInduction ceremony for Ethics Board and Research Council

Friday, July 26, 13

OLFU-RX Call for PapersFor Poster Presentation. The size of the poster must be 18x24 inches (portrait) with content font size of no less than 16. It must be printed in cintra or sticker material posted on board.

For Oral Presentation. Accepted presentation files are MS Powerpoint, iWork Keynote and Prezi. Pictures should not be less than 96 dpi.

For AudioVideo Presentation. AV presentations can be static (picture and text-based) or dynamic (video-based). The entry should contain clear audio and video, and not exceeding 10 minutes in duration.

ENTRY SUBMISSION:July 30 to September 6, 2013

(online)

Friday, July 26, 13

8RDIC

Friday, July 26, 13

8RDIC

Doing research to improve man as man,publishing research work to rise to the top!

Friday, July 26, 13