strengthening early mathematics education5 math is clearly seen as a critical skill subject – both...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Douglas H. Clements, Julie Sarama, University of Denver
Arthur J. Baroody, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign & DU
Strengthening Early Mathematics Education
© 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, D. H. Clements, Ph.D., & Julie Sarama, Ph.D. All rights reserved. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
2
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
Math’s Predictive Power
Large-scale research, predicting school success(Duncan et al., 2007)
3
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
Math Predicts
• Early math best predictor of elementary school success
• Math best predictor of high school graduation and college entry (Duncan et al., in press)
• Persistent math problems most reliable predictor
4 Untitled - November 25, 2013
!5
Math is clearly seen as a critical skill subject – both in theory but also in a practical sense
!Both children and parents rate it as the most important school subject.
!Both see it as the subject most needed for a good job.
!Both see it as the subject they will use the most.
Source: PROMISE research, Phase 2, June 2010
5
!6
!Most kids (8 of 10) like school and like math (7 of 10) !Only 55% think they are excellent or very good at it !All three measure slip in 7-8th grade
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
. . . And parents may be feeding into this: !Parents’ ratings of their children in math also decrease as they age.
Source: PROMISE research, Phase 2, June 2010
An Issue of Confidence
6
!7Source: PROMISE research, Phase 2, June 2010
Some parents believe that certain children will simply “never get math
29%think math ability
is hereditary
39%say it’s okay for a child to say “I’m not good in
math”
7
!8
Opportunities needed
Our schools need to find ways to ensure the
brightest kids have opportunities to take
higher-level courses in areas like math and
science !
91%
8 Untitled - November 25, 2013
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
9 10
Professional Development&
Best PracticesBoth involve:
• Promoting a conceptual understanding of the mathematics, especially the big ideas (e.g., for PD, comprehending the mathematics taught in pre-K-grade 8);
• Engaging learners in actual mathematical inquiry (e.g., problem solving, reasoning, justifying);
• Integrating/connecting instruction with other domains (e.g., for PD, integrating math content instruction with mathematical psychology and best instructional practices);
• ensuring instruction is engaging or motivating.
Professional Development and Best Practices
11
Zork Odd and Even
12 Untitled - November 25, 2013
Example:Zork Odd and Even
1. Provides a basis for understanding
A. zero is an even number and
B. the concept of even and odd numbers.
by relating these concepts to the big idea of equal partitioning (fair sharing):
an even number of items can be shared fairly by exactly two people.
13
Equal partitioning also underlies variety of other concepts
• division—either a partitive meaning (An amount shared fairly among a certain number of people yields a share of what size for each person?) or quotitive division (An amount divided into equal shares of a particular size yields how many shares?);
• fractions—both a quotient meaning (e.g., 3/4 can be viewed as: Sharing three candy bars among four people, what is the size of each person’s share?) and a and part-whole meaning (e.g., 3/4 can be viewed as: What part of the whole candy bar is three of four equal size pieces?);
• measurement—a continuous quantity such as length or area can be subdivided into equal size parts or shares (units), which can then be counted;
• mean—to find what a typical share size (score) would be if everyone had the same size share, combine all shares (scores), and then divvy them up the total fairly among the number of people (number of scores).
14
2. Zork Odd and Even could be used by PD trainers or teachers of children to involve learners in solving a genuine problem by simply posing such questions as: Is the game fair? Is there a winning strategy?
3 & 4. Addressing those questions could create a real need to collect and analyze data
or
addressing such questions as If we have 10 fingers and group by tens, what do you suppose they group by on planet Zork? or How would a Zorkian represent 4, 7, 8, 15, 16 with a written number? provides a basis for exploring and understanding grouping and place-value concepts and skills
—in an entertaining manner that promotes a positive disposition.
15
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
16 Untitled - November 25, 2013
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
Learning Trajectory for Counting
• Art’s Alison
17
Learning Trajectory for Counting
• Precounter Says number words, not sequence: "one, two, four…”.
• Chanter Says in sequence but may run together
• Reciter Verbal counting to 5, then 10
18
19 20 Untitled - November 25, 2013
Learning Trajectory for Counting
• Corresponder Counts correctly using 1-1 correspondence, at least up to 5 objects in a line
• Counter (Small Numbers) Counts 1-5 objects in a line meaningfully (i.e., employ the cardinal rule)
21
Learning Trajectory for Counting
• Producer (Small Numbers) Counts out a collection up to 5
• Counter (10) Counts collections up to 10
• Counter and Producer (10+) and keeps track of unorganized collections
22
23
Learning Trajectory for Counting
• Counter from N Can count from any number; +1 and -1
• Counter On Using Patterns
• Counter on Keeping Track (includes hidden object tasks)
• Counter of Quantitative Units Counts unusual units, including “wholes” of broken objects
• Counter Forward and Back Counts embedded sequences, decades, etc.
24 Untitled - November 25, 2013
Learning Trajectories: 3 Parts
1.Goal
2.Developmental Progression
3. Instructional Activities
25 26
27 28 Untitled - November 25, 2013
Geometry and Measurement
29
• Which are rectangles?
• Slightly > 50%
• 4s were more likely toaccept the squares
• All accepted “long” quads w/ pair of parallel sides#3, 6, 10, and 14
• Properties less frequently
7
1
2
3
4 5
68
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Rectangles
30
Low SES 4-6Mid SES 6-12
Compare to Elem.—Rectangles
31
What Children See
• Ring the triangles
32 Untitled - November 25, 2013
A Trajectory for
Composing Geometric
Shapes
33
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
Pre-Composer
34
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
Picture Maker
35
Shape Composer
What’s important? —Think, pair, share
36 Untitled - November 25, 2013
Take Away
• All 3 components of LT’s
37
Brief #3: Interventions
• What is a research-based intervention?
38
TRIAD Scale-up Model
39
• 167 classrooms in 3 states
• Schools publicly, randomly assigned to:
• TRIAD
• TRIAD-with Follow Through
• Control
Design
40 Untitled - November 25, 2013
Control
TRIAD
Rasch scores
p < .0001
ES = .72
41
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
Building Blocks in the News
• http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/15776035/detail.html
42
Ctrl-Non Ctrl-AA TRIAD-Non TRIAD-AA
43
Follow Through
44 Untitled - November 25, 2013
Control
TRIAD
TRIAD Follow Through
45
ControlTRIAD
TRIAD Follow ThroughTo do better than this…
We need this…
46
Relationship to Other Domains: Example—Language and Literacy
Does that area suffer?
47
Assessments• Letter Recognition
• Renfrew Bus Story Assessment
48 Untitled - November 25, 2013
Results
• Letter recognition: ns
• Bus Story, ns on:
• Sentence length
• Listening
• Story duration
49
Results• Sig. higher for TRIAD on:
• Information .29
-1.10
-1.00
-0.90
-0.80
-0.70
-0.60
-0.50 Control Building Blocks
Information (Rasch) - OL Scores by Treatment Group - Beginning of K (Fall 2007), TRIAD II
50
Results• Sig. higher for TRIAD on:
• Information .29
• Complexity .16
0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25
Control Building Blocks
Complexity (Raw) - OL Scores by Treatment Group - Beginning of K (Fall 2007), TRIAD II
51
Results• Sig. higher for TRIAD on:
• Information .29
• Complexity .16
• Independence .36
36.00 36.50 37.00 37.50 38.00 38.50 39.00 39.50 40.00
Control Building Blocks
Independence (Raw) - OL Scores by Treatment Group - Beginning of K (Fall 2007), TRIAD II
52 Untitled - November 25, 2013
Results• Sig. higher for TRIAD on:
• Information .29
• Complexity .16
• Independence .36
• Inferential Questions .16
3.40
3.50
3.60
3.70
3.80
3.90
4.00
Control Building Blocks
Inferential Reasoning: Q2 Practical (Raw) - OL Scores by Treatment Group - Beginning of K (Fall 2007), TRIAD II
53
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
Is Early Math “Research-based”?
• You can not consider yourself child-centered without substantial mathematics
• The whole child
54
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
Math and Play
55
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
Math, Literacy, and Play
• Curricula focus lead to stronger emphasis in subject-matter
• Children in content-focused classrooms more likely to engage at high-quality level during free play
• Those focusing on both math and literacy more engaged at high level than neither or only one!
56 Untitled - November 25, 2013
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
NRC Recommendation #1
“A coordinated national early childhood mathematics initiative should be put in place to improve mathematicsteaching and learning forall children” (p. 3).
57
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
Professional Development
• All teachers, children 0-8, need
• Pre-service: Minimum of 2 courses…
• Combining 3 components of LTs, and affect, as ‘Zork’ modeled
• Inservice: 50 to 75 hours
• Grounded in practice
58
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
Professional Development• Performance assessment of teachers seeking
certification, including
• mathematical competencies (show two ways to add),
• interpreting children’s behaviors (e.g., diagnosing errors), and
• pedagogy (design and implement a research-based activity that addresses a key goal of the CCSS).
• States’ standards for research-based professional development
59
© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.© D. H. Clements. Do not use or duplicate without permission.
Math Specialists
• Specialist just teaching math
• Team member specializing
• At least: Specializing coach
60 Untitled - November 25, 2013