stochastic aerodynamics
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
1/17
Stochastic Aerodynamics:
An Application to Bluff
Body with Variable Gust
Inlets
Dr. Imran Afgan
STURM4
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
2/17
Breakdown of Work
Modelling and Numerics LES (Standard Smagorinsky) model with Code_Saturne
Conforming/Non-Conforming Mesh Refinement Investigation
Bluff Body 1 (Flat Plate)
Bluff Body 2 (Cylinder arrays)
Code_Saturne Development
STURM4
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
3/17
Bluff Body 1 (Flat Plate)
Establish a test case with for flow over a Bluff body (Normal & oblique
Flat Plate) using literature review Code_Saturne user programming tweaking to obtain desired output
variables
Testing of Code_Saturne on the user subroutines for a simple channelflow
Benchmark the test case with available data Use Generalized Chaos polynomial (gCP) as a Black box to obtain
desired input parameters
Perform a number of LES runs to obtain the output variables.
Postprocess the output variables by gCP to obtain a set of data for thedesired range
STURM4
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
4/17
Bluff Body 2 (Cylinder Arrays) Establish test cases with flow over a wide range of
tube bundle configurations Benchmark the test case with available data
Testing a number of non-conforming meshes for a
complete parametric study
Perform a refined LES/DNS of the tube bundles with
various inlet
STURM4
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
5/17
Over & Above Bluff Body 2 (Cylinder arrays)
Perform a refined LES/DNS of the tube bundles with
various inlet conditions
Perform a gCP analysis much like Case 1 to generate
a test database
Code_Saturne Development
Implementation of Wall adapting Local Eddy Viscosity
Model in Code_Saturne via user subroutines
Benchmark the case with a channel flow simulation
STURM4
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
6/17
Case 1: Flat Plate Establishment of test case and Flow parameters
Re (2.5 x 104 2.5 x 105)
Uniform Inlet
2 Configurations to be tested
Flat Plate normal (900) to the inflow
Flat Plate oblique (450) to the inflow
Lift, drag, Pressure, Admittance Parameter, U,V,W,
some higher order statistics uiuj
STURM4
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
7/17
Geometry
STURM4
6H
24H
15HH
Height (y): H
Thickness (x): 0.1H
Length (z): 14H (Spanwise direction Periodic BC
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
8/17
Numerical Grid
STURM4
2 D Mesh contains 250,000 cells
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
9/17
Flat Plate Data
STURM4
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
10/17
Application of Gust Inlet
STURM4
( )( )
[ ]
2 2
0 4( )( ) sin 3
/ 2
is Gust Life, is Amplitude and 0,
t t Tu t U A t T TT
T A t T
= + +
T
A
( , , , ) velocity signal with gust inlet
( , , ), ( , , ) decoupling life and amplitude of gust
( , , ) for different cases, where is number of cases choseni i
u f x t T A
u f x t A u f x t T
u f x t A i
=
= =
=
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
11/17
gPC Pre-processor
( , , )u x t
( , , ) where 1,inlet ju x t z j Nq=
CFD Solver
Code_Saturne
PDF of Stochastic Input is chosen a priori andassigned
Nq number of Quadrature points are also chosen apriori
var( , , ) where 1,
iable jO x t z j Nq=
Stochastic Collection Method
2
( , , ), ( )( , ) where k=0,K
( )
k
k
k
O x tO x t
=
where
( , , ), ( ) ( , , ). ( ). ( )k kO x t O x t d
=
Can be approximated by Monte Carlo method or quasi Monte Carlo method
We on the other hand use Deterministic Numerical Quadrature Method
var
0
( , , ), ( ) . ( , , ). ( ) where 0,Z
k j j k j
j
O x t w O x t z z k K =
= =
Wherejw is the weight function, ( )k is the orthogonal polynomial which depends up
the PDF selection criteria
gPC Method
Some Selected Classical orthogonal PolynomialsRandom field data is now represented using
gPC expansion of the form
0
( ; , ) ( , ). ( )K
k k k
k
O x t w O x t =
=
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
12/17
Case 2: Tube Bundles Cross flow over square in-line tube bundles with 4 different gap ratios was tested. P/D=1.2, 1.5, 1.6
and 1.75
Comparison was made with experimental data and with LES of Code Saturne
P/D=1.5 case was also simulated with conventional URANS models
Average Cp comparison
for P/D=1.5 case
Cross sectional View of
the grid
Pseudo-average mean velocity streamlines. From left to right: P/D=1.2, P/D=1.5, P/D=1.6 and P/D=1.75
Average Velocity contours at
mid section for P/D=1.5 case
STURM4
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
13/17
WALE Model*
Based on the traceless part of the
square of the velocity gradient tensor
Where the Wale constant is
estimated as
Model is based purely on wall
behaviour and dimensional analysis
so no additional and/or special walltreatments are required
( )
( ) ( )
3/ 2
12 2
5/ 45/ 22
& &
( ) ( ) & &
d d
ij ij
T W W d d
ij ij ij ij
OP
v C COP S S= =
+
( )3/ 2
1/ 2
2 2
1
2
2 ij ijW S
ij ij
S S
C C
OPS SOP
=
STURM4
* Nicoud, F., Ducros, F. 1999. Subgrid scale stress modelling based on the square of the
velocity gradient tensor. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. Vol 62, 183-200
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
14/17
Bibliography Flat Plate Breuer, M., Jovicic, N. 2001. Separated Flow Around a Flat Plate at High Incidence: An LES
Investigation. Journal of Turbulence, 1468-5248, Vol. 2, N 18.
Chen, J. M., Fang, Y. -C. 1996. Strouhal Numbers of Inclined Flat Plates. Journal of WindEngineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 61, pp 99-112.
Drabble, M. J., Grant, I., Armstrong, B. J., Barnes, F. H. 1990. The Aerodynamic Admittance of aSquare Plate in a Flow with a Fully Coherent Fluctuation. Physics of Fluids A 2(6), pp 1005-1013.
Dennis, S. C. R., Wang Qiang, Coutanceau, M., Launay, J. L. 1993. Viscous Flow Normal to aFlat Plate at Moderate Reynolds Numbers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Vol. 248, pp 605-635.
Fage, A., Johansen, F. C. 1927. On the Flow of Air behind an Inclined Flat Plate of Infinite Span.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A. Vol. 116, No. 773, pp 170-197. Julien, S., Lasheras, J., Chomaz, J,-M. 2003. Three-Dimensional Instability and Vorticity Patters in
the Wake of a Flat Plate. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Vol. 479, pp 155-189.
Julien, S., Ortiz, S., Chomaz, J.-M. 2004. Secondary Instability Mechanisms in the Wake of a FlatPlate. European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids. Vol. 23, pp 157-165.
Kiya, M., Matsumura, M. 1988. Incoherent Turbulence Structure in the Near Wake of a Normal
Plate. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Vol 190, pp 343-356. Leder, A. 1991. Dynamics of Fluid Mixing in Separated Flows. Physics of Fluids A 3, pp 1741-
1748.
Mazharoglu, C., Hacisenvki, H. 1999. Coherent and Incoherent Flow Structures Behind a NormalFlat Plate. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 19, pp 160-167.
STURM4
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=t713665472~tab=issueslist~branches=2#v2http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=t713665472~tab=issueslist~branches=2#v2http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=t713665472~tab=issueslist~branches=2#v2 -
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
15/17
Najjar, F. M., Vanka, S. P. 1995a. Simulations of the Unsteady Separated Flow Past a NormalFlat Plate. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Fluids. Vol. 21, pp 525-547.
Najjar, F. M., Vanka, S. P. 1995b. Effects of Intrinsic Three-Dimensionality on the DragCharacteristics of a Normal Flat Plate. Physics of Fluids 7(10), pp 2516-2518.
Najjar, F. M., Balachandar, S. 1998. Low Frequency Unsteadyness in the Wake of a Normal FlatPlate. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Vol. 370, pp 101-147.
Narasimhamurthy, V. D., Andersson, H. I. 2009. Numerical Simulation of the Turbulent WakeBehind a Normal Flat Plate. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 30, pp 1037-1043.
Perry, A. E., Steiner, T. R. 1987. Large-scale Vortex Structures in Turbulent Wakes behind Bluff
Bodies. Part 1: Vortex Formation Processes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Vol. 174, pp 233-270. Steiner, T. R., Perry, A. E., 1987. Large-scale Vortex Structures in Turbulent Wakes behind Bluff
Bodies. Part 2: Far-Wake Structures. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Vol. 174, pp 271-298.
Saha, A. K. 2007. Far-Wake Characteristics of Two-Dimensional Flow past a normal flat plate.Physics of Fluids. Vol. 19, Article 128110.
Tamaddon-Jahromi, H. R., Townsend, P, Wbster, M. F. 1994. Unsteady Viscous Flow Past a Flat
Plate Orthogonal to the Flow. Computers and Fluids. Vol. 23, No. 2, pp 433-446. Wu, S. J., Miau, J. J., Hu, C. C., Chou, J. H. 2005. On Low-Frequency modulations and three-
dimensionality in Vortex Shedding Behind a Normal Plate. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Vol. 526,pp 117-146.
Yeung, W. W. H., Pakinson, G. V. 1997. On the Steady Separated Flow Around and Inclined FlatPlate. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Vol. 333, pp 403-413.
STURM4
Bibliography Flat Plate (cont.)
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
16/17
Bibliography Tube Bundles Aiba, S., Tsuchida, H., Ota, T. 1982. Heat Transfer around Tubes in In-line Tube Banks. Bull. JSME, 25, 919-926.
Benhamadouche, S., Laurence, D., 2003. LES, coarse LES, and transient RANS comparisons on the flow acrosstube bundle. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 4, 470-479.
Benhamadouche, S., Laurence, D., Jarrin, N., Afgan, I., Moulinec, C. 2005. Large Eddy Simulation of Flow AcrossIn-line Tube Bundles, 11th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics (NURETH-11),Popes Palace Conference Center, Avignon, France. Paper: 405.
Boris, J.P., Grinstein, F.F., Oran, E.S., Kolbe, R.L. 1992. New Insights into LES. Fluid Dynamics Res. 10, 199-228.
Bouris, D., Bergeles, G. 1999. Two dimensional Time Dependent Simulation of the Subcritical Flow in a StaggeredTube Bundle using a Subgrid-scale Model. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 20:2, 105-114.
Bouris, D., Papadakis, G., Bergeles, G. 2001. Numerical Evaluation of Alternate Tube Configurations for ParticleDeposition Rate in Heat Exchanger Tube Bundles. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 22:5, 525-536.
Breuer, M., Rodi, W. 1994. LES of Turbulent Flow through a Straight Square Duct and 1800 End. Voke, P. et al.(Eds), Direct and LES I. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. 273-285.
Celik, I. B., Cehreli, Z. N., Yavuz, I. 2005. Index of resolution quality for Large Eddy Simulations. J. of Fluids Engg,127, 949-958.
Chen, S. S. 1987. Flow-Induced Vibration of Circular Cylindrical Structures. Hemisphere publishing corporation.
Chen, S.S., Jendrzejczyk, J.A. 1987. Fluid Excitation Forces Acting on a Square Tube Array. JSME TransactionsVol 109, 415-423.
Ferziger, J.H., Peric, M. 2002. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer, third edition. Fitz-Hugh, J.S. 1973. Flow Induced Vibration in Heat Exchangers. Proc. Int. Sym. on Vibration Problems in
Industry, Keswick, UK, Paper No. 427; in Flow induced vibration of circular cylinder structures by Chen, S. S.
Frohlich, J. Rodi, W. 2002. Introduction to Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows. Closure strategies forturbulent and transitional flows by B. Launder and N. Sandham, Cambridge University press. 267-298.
Hassan, Y., Ibrahim, W. 1997. Turbulence Prediction in Two-Dimensional Tube Bundle Flows using Large EddySimulation, Nuclear Technology 119, 11-28.
STURM4
-
8/9/2019 Stochastic Aerodynamics
17/17