statistical yearbook of fair trade commission · pdf file · 2015-08-04statistical...
TRANSCRIPT
� � � � � � �
STATISTICAL YEARBOOK OF FAIR TRADE COMMISSION
���� 103�
2014
����
���� 104� 4��
Fair Trade Commission
April 2015
����
��������� ���������������������� !"#$%&
'()*+%,-�.(/01 2201 5�3(456789:;
<����=>?)�@ABC?D
�����EF%GH;
�<��I?JD��KLMN#$�OPQRSTU�N#$����VWVKL#$��
���XYZ[\]^_`#$;
�a�bcd;
�A�01Dbcefgh�M?KL�ijklmK�nmopK�qIrs;
a����tuvwxy%zI{|%0}4+d�~}|;
A������bc��(/���$?�+td}|3(���5�����KL��L)����
������)�;
����������h��D
� d����
-- d���h��
… d���i�
0 d���i\���
�������vw) �vw(¡%¢£=>i¤¥(¦��£��)�;
§����vw¨©�+��ª«�ª¬ http://www.ftc.gov.tw/��U[bc�/����u�(
�9���=>®¯°±²³´VTu(µ e-mail��¶·¸L¹º[email protected];
»�¼½�����+ 104� 2¾ 4¿�Às�(�ÁÂ�¼½¢�����;
I
����
���� Editorial Notes
1. The Statistical Year Book is to provide an overview of work and achievements of the Fair Trade
Commission’s enforcement of the Fair Trade Act. In order to facilitate international exchange, the
Yearbook is written by a Chinese-English bilingual way except Appendix 2~5.
2. The Yearbook consists of four parts:
- Organization & duty of the Fair Trade Commission.
- Summary AnalysisDProcessing of cases, Regulation of multi-level sales Enterprises, Commissioners
Meeting and consulting service & policy implementation.
- Statistical Tables.
- Appendix: major statistical terminologies, list of decision rulings, list of mergers not prohibited, list
of concerted actions approved, and important measures of the FTC.
3. Sources, notes, remarks for data are shown below the tables.
4. In this Yearbook, “year” refers to calendar year and data are measured by “case” or “NT dollar” unless
otherwise specified.
5. The following symbols are used for tables:
- None
-- Meaningless
… Not available
0 Less than half unit
6. The figures showing in this issue may not be the same with the corresponding figures in the previous
issue due to the corrections and revisions made in exchange of base.
7. The data of this Yearbook can be found on the “statistics” / “Yearbook” of the website of the Fair
Trade Commission (http://www.ftc.gov.tw/). For any request or advice, please e-mail toD
» The most recent amendments to the Fair Trade Act was promulgated and enacted on 4 February, 2015.
The materials included in this Yearbook was prior to that date.
����
II
�� Contents
������� I. About the FTC
����EFÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 3 1. Organization ChartÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 9
<���CÅGHÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 3 2. Departments and ResponsibilitiesÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 9
��� �� II. Summary Analysis
��KLMN#$ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 15 1.Processing of CasesÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 43
<�OPQRSTU�N#$ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 30 2. Regulation of Multi-Level Sales EnterprisesÄÄ 60
a����VWVKL#$ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 33 3.Commissioners MeetingÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 63
A�����XYZ[\]^_`#$ 35 4.Consulting Services & Policy Implementation 65
����� III. Statistical Tables
ÆÇ\ÈKKL Cases Received and Self-initiated
d 1 ÆÇ\ÈKKLbc�ÉÆÇ\
ÈK�¾�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
76 1. Cases Received and Self-initiated– by
PeriodÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
76
d 2 ÊcKL�\ÊclKËbcÄÄÄ 77 2. Accumulated Cases and Accumulated
Cases Conclusion RatioÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
77
d 3 ÌÍKLMNbc�ÉlK�
¾�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 78
3. Results of Complaints – by Case-
closure TimeÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 78
d 4 ÌÍKLMNbc�ÉÌÍ¥
\ÎÌÍ¥Ï�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 80
4. Results of Complaints – by Classification
of Complainant & Complained Entity 80
d 5 ÌÍKLMNbc�ÉÌÍ¥
Ð?��?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 81
5. Results of Complaints – by Classification
of Complainant and PeriodÄÄÄÄÄÄ 81
d 6 ÌÍKLMNbc�ÉÎÌÍ
¥Ð?��?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 82
6. Results of Complaints – by Classification
of Complained Entity and PeriodÄÄÄ 82
d 7 ÌÍKLMNbc�ÉÎÌÍ
¥�U�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 83
7. Results of Complaints – by Industry of
Complained EntityÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 83
d 8 ÌÍKLMNbc�ÉÎÌÍ
¥ÑÒ�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
88 8. Results of Complaints – by Area of
Complained EntityÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
88
d 9 Óµnm�)KLbcÄÄÄÄÄ 89 9. Applications for Concerted ActionÄÄ 89
d 10 Óµnm�)opKLbc�
Énm�)ÔÕ?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 90
10. Approvals for Concerted Action – by
Types of Concerted ActionÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 90
d 11 lmKLbcÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 91
11. Applications and Notifications for
MergerÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 91
d 12 lmop³ijklmKLb
c�ÉlmÕÖ�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 92
12. Merger – by Types of MergersÄÄÄÄÄÄ 92
III
��
�������
��� ��
�����
��
�������
��� ��
�����
d13 µ×KLMNbc�ÉlK�¾
�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 93
13. Results of Explanation Request – by
Case-closure TimeÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ93
d14 �`ØÙKLbcÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 94 14. FTC Self-initiated InvestigationsÄÄÄÄ 94
d15 ÌÍKM?#$�ÉÚ��)�
?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
96
15. Complaints Subject to Decision Ruling –
by Illegal PracticesÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
96
d16 �`ØÙKM?#$�ÉÚ��
)�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 98
16. Decisions for FTC Self-initiated
Investigations Case –by Illegal
PracticesÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 98
d17 M?KLbc�ÉÚ��)�\
Û8�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 100
17. Cases of Decision – by Illegal
Practices & ArticlesÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
100
d18 M?KLbc�ÉÚ��)�\
�U�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 104
18. Cases of Decision – by Illegal Practices
& IndustryÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
104
d19 M?KLÜÝbc�ÉÚ��)
�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
114
19. Decisions for Imposing Penalty – by
Illegal PracticesÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
114
d20 M?KLÞ�bc�ÉÚ��)
�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 118
20. Business Firms Subject to Decision – by
Illegal PracticesÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 118
d21 M?KLÜß��bc�ÉÚ�
�)�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
120
21. Fines Subject to Decision – by
Illegal PracticesÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
120
d22 àáM?K\ÜßKLbcÄÄÄÄÄ 122 22. Decisions Affirmed and Fines and Cases
of Decision Statements…….……122
�]âã
Appeals
d23 �]M?KL�äåæ\�]å
çbcÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 124
23. Appeals and Administrative Pro-
ceedingsÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 124
d24 åæKLbcÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 126 24. Results of AppealÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 126
d25 ÎèSM?KLbc�Éé��
)�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
128
25. Decisions Repealed – by Type of Illegal
PracticesÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
128
OPQRS
Multi-level Sales
d26 OPQRSTU�êÞ�bcÄÄÄ 132 26. Recordation of Multi-level Sales
EnterprisesÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
132
d27 OPQRSTU�êÞ�bc�
ÉÑÒ�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 133
27. Recordation of Multi-level Sales
Enterprises– by AreaÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
133
d28 OPQRSTUU[ÌÙbcÄÄÄ 136 28. Inspection of Multi-level Sales Enter-
Prises ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
136
d29 ÚëOPQRS�NÇ�M?
KL�ÉÚëÛ8�?ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
138
29. Decision Ruling for Multi-level Sales
Enterprisesìby Illegal Articles ÄÄÄÄ
138
íî
Other
d30 ���VVKbcÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 142 30. Deliberation of ProposalsÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 142
d31 Z[6ïZ[bcÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 144 31. Services of Service CenterÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 144
��
�������
��� ��
�����
IV
d32 ��ðñlòÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 146 32. FTC Manpower StructureÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 146
d33 ���óÑ~��ôõö÷ÇN
����øõU[bcÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 148
33. Supporting Activities of Local
GovernmentsÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 148
d34 ����� ùú{|�bcÄÄÄ 150 34. Educational Seminars on FTA &
MLMSAÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 150
���� IV. Appendix
��qIbcefghÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 153 1. Major Statistical TerminologiesÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 156
<�M?KL�ûdÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 160 2. List of Decision RulingsÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 160
a�ijklmKL�ûdÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 180 3. List of Merger Not ProhibitedÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 180
A�nm�)opKL�ûdÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 184 4. List of Concerted Action Cases ApprovedÄÄÄ 184
����qIrsÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 186 5. Important Measures of FTCÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 186
�������
V
����
����
�������
����
������
����
����
�����
-3-
103 ������
����
������
��������� ����
1. ��������������� !"
2#������������$%� !"
3#&'����$��������$(�)*� +"
4#&'����$��������$��,-#./-�01-� +"
5#234-� !"
6#�56$7823�!�!9:"
�����
-4-
������
����������
�����
�����
�!"�
#�$%�
;�<=9:�
1. ��(�%c#�E�+#��>H�>?#�k���"
2. ��&$|3���%c�&'"
3. �������S����_�"
4. ��q�����#q����"
5. ����$�jVW�XY#���lD`a"
6. ������[$B���%c���"
7. �5�u�����_%c9:"
&�'�()*�
;�<=9:uy��#�_��_'�#�E����#�E�� ¡¢�����£'
�#¤¥ ¦§��'��kl0�9:¨
1. ©ª`aj#«�`a�¬|`aj"
2. ªj#®#¯°�±pj"
3. ²³#´µ�w�ij"
4. ¶#·#¸#¹j"
+�,-()*�
;�<=9juy��#�_��_'�#�E����#�E�� ¡¢�����£'
�#¤¥ ¦§��'��kl0�9:¨
1. º�»¼j#½j#¾¿»�»¼j�ÀÁ»�»¼j"
2. ²x»�»¼j#ÂÃi�»¼j#®©Ä»¼j��5»¼j"
3. Åj#ÆÇÈÉj#ʼj�ËÂÌÍj"
4. �5Îu wÏÐÑ�'j"
.�/0)*�
;�<=9:�
1. 9jÒÓ'�#ÔÕwÖ ×|ØÙ�ÚÛ#ÚÜ�Ý,'��kl0�"
2. Þß5|Êjpà'���5áâãä��åæ�¤¥ ¦§��'��kl0�"
3. �����9j�çè#���wé�����'��kl0�"
-5-
������
;�<=9:�
1. ����$%�>?�@A"
2. ����$B�CD"
3. ����$EFG�>H"
4. IJ����$KL&'�0�"
5. ����$M9I$-N�OP"
6. ����$'�QR�0�"
7. STU����$%VW�XY�>H"
����������
;���VZ[\R1]^_`a�b%c�de�VZ7fgh�%c[���[ijk
l�\R1]"
�����
;�!9#mn#op#qr#sa#�tuv�wxyz0#{9:"
�����
6$;�|9��9:"
�!"�
6$;�})#�)�~)9:"
#�$%�
6$;���9:"
&�'�()*�
+�,-()*�
.�/0)*�
I. Organization and Duty of
Fair Trade Commission
-9-
Organization Chart
Departments and Responsibilities
1. The Commissioners Meeting
The highest decision-making organ of the FTC; it shall be charged with the disposition of matters
regarding the following:
(1) Review of fair trade and multi-level sales administration policies;
(2) Review of fair trade and multi-level sales administration regulations;
(3) Evaluation and approval of enforcement plans for the Fair Trade Act and the Supervisory
Regulations Governing Multi-level Sales;
(4) Evaluation and decision on announcement, approval and disposition with regard to cases involving
the Fair Trade Act and the Supervisory Regulations Governing Multi-level Sales;
(5) Review of motions presented by commissioners;
(6) Other decisions defined by law to be made at commissioners' meetings.
Chief Secretary
Chairperson
Vice Chairperson
Commissioners
Commissioners
Meeting
Budget�
Accounting and
Statistics Office
Department of
Service Industry
Competition
Department of
Fair
Competition
Civil Service
Ethics
Office
Department
of Planning
Department of
Manufacturing
Industry
Competition
Department
of Legal
Affairs
Information and
Economic
Analysis Office
Personnel
Office
Secretariat
-10-
�
2. Department of Planning
The Department of Planning shall be charged with the following matters:
(1) preparing and formulating fair trade policies;
(2) preparing and implementing the training programs for law enforcement officers;
(3) international exchange and cooperation of fair trade policy;
(4) editing and publishing of the relevant publications;
(5) collecting and maintaining fair trade studies and provigin consulting services;
(6) planning and advocating fair trade policy and law; and
(7) handling other matters related to the planning of fair trade.
3. Department of Service Industry Competition
The Department of Service Industry Competition shall investigate and process matters relating to
monopolies, mergers, concerted actions, resale price maintenance, lessening competition or impeding
fair competition, and deceptive or obviously unfair conduct by enterprises in the following sectors:
(1) industrial/commercial services, social and personal services;
(2) commercial, transportation, warehousing, and communications businesses;
(3) finance, insurance, real-estate; and
(4) agriculture, forestry, fishery, and animal husbandry.
4. Department of Manufacturing Industry Competition
The Department of Service Industry Competition shall investigate and process matters relating to
monopolies, mergers, concerted actions, resale price maintenance, lessening competition or impeding
fair competition, and deceptive or obviously unfair conduct by enterprises in the following sectors:
(1) manufacture of food products, textiles, Chemical Products, Plastics Products;
(2) manufacture of metals, electronic products, transport equipment and parts, and others;
(3) mining, earth/gravel excavating businesses, construction, and supply of water, electricity, and gas;
and
(4) other related or non-classifiable businesses.
5. Department of Fair Competition
The Department of Fair Competition shall be charged with investigating and processing the following:
(1) counterfeiting, false or misleading representations, symbols and advertisements;
(2) business defamation, and other deceptive or obviously unfair acts that are sufficient to affect
trading order; and
(3) report filing, management, and investigating illegal conducts of multi-level sales.
-11-
6. Department of Legal Affairs
The Department of Legal Affairs shall be charged with the following matters:
(1) preparing and formulating fair trade laws and regulations and amendments thereof;
(2) consulting laws and regulations related to fair trade;
(3) studying and researching legal systems related to fair trade;
(4) carry out the execution of fines;
(5) enforcement referral of criminal cases;
(6) administrative appeal case handling; and
(7) referral of criminal offenders for prosecution.
7. Information and Economic Analysis Office
The Information and Economic Analysis Office shall be charged with strategic planning and
development of integrated services on information and economic analysis, planning and management
of environment information system , industry survey, and economic analysis.
8. Secretariat
The Secretarial Office shall be charged with meetings, clerical matters, use of the official seal,
receipts and disbursements, general affairs, and public relations as well as matters not relating to
other Departments.
9. Personnel Office
The Personnel Office administers personnel affairs as prescribed by laws.
10. Budget�Accounting and Statistics Office
The Accounting Office administers the annual budget, accounting and statistical affairs as prescribed
by laws.
11. Civil Service Ethics Office
The Civil Service Ethics Office administers civil service ethics matters as prescribed by laws.
������
������
������
����
� ������
� ������ ��
-15-
������
103�������� 2,375� ������ 374������ 2,001����� 1,538
��������� 8��� !�� 68���"� 387�#$%�&��'(�!�)* 95
� 76.0+,�-. 103�/ 90.3+ ������(�!�) 94.4% �����(�!�) 70.1%
$0123456
������
103�7����8 2,001� 9 102�:; 28��: 1.4+# < 103�=�>&��8 2,225
� ��?@ 102�AB!�� 224� CD&!�8 2,100� 9 102�:; 111��: 5.6+#
EF 103�AB!�� 125�$�G 1.1#
� 1.1 ������
����
H��IJK8 103������ 1,538� 9 102�LM 85��L 5.2+# ������
� 8� 9 102�:; 4� � !�� 68� 9 102�:; 17� �"� 387� N9 102�
:; 92��: 31.2+#$H��!OPQR S���T 76.9+UV �W��"�T 19.3+$E
F 103�AX %����Y8/ 4Z 2,494�$�G 1.2�[ 1.1#
� 1.2 ������ ��
������
�� �� ��� �� �� ���� ��
101� 2,114 1,955 10 52 97
102� 1,973 1,623 4 51 295
103� 2,001 1,538 8 68 387
103�� 102�
�����
1.4 -5.2 100.0 33.3 31.2
�� ���
101� 100.0 92.5 0.5 2.5 4.6
102� 100.0 82.3 0.2 2.6 15.0
103� 100.0 76.9 0.4 3.4 19.3
103�� 102�
�������
-- -5.4 0.2 0.8 4.3
��
����
��� !�"#�
$�"#� !�%&
101� 179 2,114 2,053 240
102� 240 1,973 1,989 224
103� 224 2,001 2,100 125
103�� 102�
�����
-6.7 1.4 5.6 -44.2
-16-
� � H���!\]^_ 103�8>& 2,225� CD&!�` 2,100� (����!)/
94.4+ 9 102 �:; 4.5 abQc$d 81 �eY8F 103 �AX %�!��Y8 4 Z
2,369� Y8!�)/ 99.7+$�G 1.3#
� 1.3 �������
����
��
'�&�(
�)* ��� �� �� ���� ��
101� 89.5 89.1 100.0 87.0 100.0
102� 89.9 88.5 100.0 86.2 99.0
103� 94.4 93.8 87.5 86.8 98.7
103�� 102�
�������
4.5 5.3 -12.5 0.6 -0.3
�"� +���(
101� 99.4 99.2 100.0 99.9 99.9
102� 99.4 99.3 100.0 99.9 99.8
103� 99.7 99.7 99.5 99.9 99.8
103�� 102�
�������
0.3 0.4 -0.5 - -
���
� �������
-17-
� �������
�f#���
103������8 1,538� 9 102� 1,623�LM 85��L 5.2+# =�>&��8 1,751
� ��?g 102�AB!�� 213�$
103�CD&!� 1,642� ��hiDQ` 77��Tj�!��� 4.7+# 9 102�LM 25
�kFlmDQ�� 199��T 12.1+# 9 102�LM 77� mDQnoSpqmr�stjd
�uvwB/DQxyz�{Vk�|D} 2��T 0.1+# 9 102�:; 1� <~��'�|
���z����������&�=��t���a����k�X>&�� 1,275 ��T 77.6
+# ��no C%>�w��!�o���s�� 44��T 3.5+# ���s�� 261��
T 20.5+# �%��w��������8 454��T 35.6+# �������������
���� �BH¡¢£¤¥¦�§¨m©'��8 516��T 40.5+#$�G 1.4#
� 1.4 �������
����
��
���� ��,
!�"
# �
$�"
# �
!�
%&
�� � - � .
/
01
��
2�
�
101� 173 1,955 1,895 86 316 6 1,340 147 233
102� 233 1,623 1,643 102 276 1 1,160 104 213
103� 213 1,538 1,642 77 199 2 1,275 89 109
�� �$������ ������
�$�
�����
101� 10.2 43.5 100.0 4.5 16.7 0.3 70.7 7.8 34.7
102� 34.7 -17.0 100.0 6.2 16.8 0.1 70.6 6.3 -8.6
103� -8.6 -5.2 100.0 4.7 12.1 0.1 77.6 5.4 -48.8
ª«��`�¬��Q®Q�f¯�°��±�²�³´�µ����¶·G�|¸��
��h¹�QI N 103��! 1,642���� Sf¯�°��T 83.8+{º 9 102�LM 0.8
abQck�±�²T 10.8+W' 9 102�:; 0.5 abQckFl¬��»¼NS�±�²T
88.9+UV f¯�° 4.7+W'$�G 1.5#
-18-
� ���� ���������������
����
�� �� 3456 78 9 :;<= 7> 5?@A .BCD EF
��G
101� 100.0 82.8 11.0 0.2 0.8 0.1 4.3 0.8
102� 100.0 84.6 10.3 0.2 0.7 0.3 3.2 0.6
103� 100.0 83.8 10.8 0.2 0.5 - 3.5 1.0
103�� 102�
�������
-- -0.8 0.5 - -0.2 -0.3 0.3 0.4
H��G
101� 100.0 2.9 92.4 0.2 1.4 - 0.7 2.4
102� 100.0 3.8 92.0 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.9 2.1
103� 100.0 4.7 88.9 0.5 2.2 - 1.0 2.7
103�� 102�
�������
-- 0.9 -3.1 0.3 1.2 -0.1 0.1 0.6
���� ������������������
103 ��!'��� H¬��`�t^_ S½¾�¿ÀtT 41.8+�U. 9 102 �:;
1.2abQc �W�ÁÂtT 13.3+ N9 102�LM 2.1abQck¥Ã�ÄÃÅÆtNÇÈÉ
Ê� T 12.4+ � 102�Ë($�G 1.6#
� 1.6 ���� !���
����
�� �
!"
#$�
�%��
&'()�
*+�
,-�
./
01�
2301
�45
67�
8+�9:�
;<�
=>�
?@�
AB�
CD�
EF�
GF
HI�
101� 100.0 1.1 16.8 2.4 0.2 1.0 34.3 3.0 4.7 13.1
102� 100.0 1.1 15.4 0.6 0.2 0.8 40.6 1.8 3.6 12.4
103� 100.0 1.5 13.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 41.8 2.6 3.8 12.4
103�� 102�
��(���)
-- 0.4 -2.1 -0.2 - -0.5 1.2 0.8 0.2 -
��
JK�
LM�NOP�
Q��
RS�
TU
VW�
XY
VW�
Z[\]
��^�
_`a
�bcd
ef
VW�
gh
Li
��b
j�
VW�
kU�
lm�
no
VW�
��
VW�
��N
pqr
s\�
tuv
101� 3.5 6.9 1.6 1.3 0.2 2.0 1.0 2.1 3.4 1.6
102� 3.5 7.2 1.5 1.7 0.1 1.8 1.2 0.9 3.2 2.3
103� 2.8 7.5 0.8 1.7 0.1 1.8 1.6 1.9 2.9 2.6
103�� 102�
��(���)
-0.7 0.3 -0.7 - - - 0.4 1.0 -0.3 0.3
��wx\��yz\]{| �}~�s����\����r s�r� �
� ������"# $%&
-19-
103 年辦結檢舉案,經扣除調查結果非屬本會主管業務或程序不符之中止審理案及重複檢舉同
一案由之案件後,涉及公平交易法等本會主管法規案件(簡稱涉法案件)計 278 件,依主要涉法行
為態樣分析,屬限制競爭行為 66 件(占涉法案件 23.7%),其中以涉及不當聯合行為與妨礙公平競
爭行為皆為 26 件(占 9.4%)居首,其次為約定轉售價格行為 10 件(占 3.6%);屬不公平競爭行為
194 件(占 69.8%),其中以涉及虛偽不實或引人錯誤廣告行為 114 件(占 41.0%)最多,其次為涉
及欺罔或顯失公平行為 68 件(占 24.5%)、涉及仿冒他人商品或服務表徵行為 10 件(占 3.6%)為
第三;另涉及非法多層次傳銷行為(含違反公平交易法及多層次傳銷管理法)23 件(占 8.3%)。(
表 1.7)
表 1.7 檢舉案件-按涉法行為態樣統計 單位:件
年別
總計
涉及公平交易法 限制 競爭 行為
不公平競 爭行 為
獨占行為
(第 10 條)
結合行為
(第 11 條)
聯合行為
(第 14 條)
約定轉售 價格行為 (第 18 條)
妨礙公平 競爭行為 (第 19 條)
101 年 408 86 4 6 52 3 21 284
102 年 379 80 7 7 28 15 23 253
103 年 278 66 2 3 26 10 26 194
103 年較 102 年 增減(%)
-26.6 -17.5 -71.4 -57.1 -7.1 -33.3 13.6 -23.3
年別
涉及公平交易法
涉 及 多層次 傳 銷 管理法
涉 及個 人資 料保護法
非 法多 層 次傳銷行為
(第 23 條、第 23 條之1 至之 4)
其他
(第 41 條 後段、 第 43 條)
仿冒他人 商 品 或 服務表徵 行 為 (第 20 條)
虛偽不實或 引 人錯 誤廣告行為(第 21 條)
損害他人營業信譽行 為
(第 22 條)
欺罔或顯失公平行 為
(第 24 條)
101 年 18 184 3 79 34 4 - -
102 年 17 175 3 58 40 6 - 2
103 年 10 114 7 68 8 - 15 -
103 年較 102 年 增減(%)
-41.2 -34.9 133.3 17.2 -90.0 - -- -
說明:1.部分案件涉法行為達二種以上,因此各涉法行為件數加總超過檢舉案件涉法行為總件數。 2.個人資料保護法(簡稱個資法)自 101 年 10 月 1 日施行;本會為收辦多層次傳銷違反個資法案件之主管機關。 3.多層次傳銷管理法自 103 年 1 月 29 日公布施行。
103 年涉法之檢舉案件中經作成違法處分者計 77 件,占涉法總件數之 27.7%,計發出處分書 82
件,按處分書所載之違法行為分析(涉及多項違法行為案件經重複計算後統計),以不公平競爭行為
計 55 件最多,占 67.1.0%,其中又以虛偽不實或引人錯誤廣告行為 42 件居多,欺罔或顯失公平行
為 17 件次之。而 103 年處分非法多層次傳銷行為(含違反公平交易法及多層次傳銷管理法)計 12
件,占 14.6%;限制競爭行為 15 件,占 18.3%,其中約定轉售價格行為 5 件,不當聯合行為 4 件,
不當結合及妨礙公平競爭行為各 3 件。(表 1.8)
-20-
表 1.8 檢舉案處分件數統計-按違法行為別分 單位:件
年別
檢舉案
處分書
件 數
涉及公平交易法
限制 競爭 行為
獨占行為
(第 10 條)
結合行為
(第 11 條)
聯合行為
(第 14 條)
約定轉售
價格行為
(第 18 條)
妨礙公平 競爭行為 (第 19 條)
不公平
競爭 行為
101 年 96 9 - 1 4 - 4 68
102 年 110 23 3 5 3 9 3 75 103 年 82 15 - 3 4 5 3 55
年別
涉及公平交易法
涉 及 多層次 傳 銷 管理法
涉 及個 人資 料保護法
非法 多層次
傳銷行為
(第 23 條、
第 23 條之
1 至之 4)
其他
(第 41 條
後段、
第 43 條)
仿冒他人 商品或 服務表徵 行為
(第 20 條)
虛偽不實 或引人 錯誤
廣告行為 (第 21 條)
損害他人
營業信譽
行為
(第 22 條)
欺罔或
顯失公平
行為
(第 24 條)101 年 - 53 1 16 20 1 - - 102 年 - 56 - 20 11 1 - - 103 年 - 42 - 17 3 1 9 -
說明:部分案件違法行為達二種以上,因此各違法行為件數加總超過檢舉處分總件數。
依檢舉案受處分事業之行業別觀察,以批發及零售業占 52.4%為最多,其次為不動產業占 13.4
%,再次為製造業占 11.0%,三者合占 76.8%。(圖 1.2)
-21-
� ������'��(# $��)*+,-�
������f�¡�×Øm(tÙÚ���C��¡ � ���ç ~¡���
I�w�¡%23 V���"������$��������xÎ��S���h stC
�� �~!" %diS# $%&lË��"'���(N')* �t+»l%'
,�Õ-�./ �012'3� 4<�5m�d*���ÙÚ67't��$
103�7���"��8 387� 9 102� 295�:; 92��8 31.2+# 9 103�D&!�
'�"� 385�^' Chi�"�:;<=wj�>?'�@HqA�<=`8 337� ��%
��w§¨m©��<=` 45�$�G 1.9#
� 1.9 ������
����
��
���� ��,
!�"
# �
$�"
# �
!�%& ��
���J
���
01�� 2�
101� 2 97 99 58 41 - -
102� - 295 292 266 26 - 3
103� 3 387 385 337 45 3 5
103�� 102�
���%�
-- 31.2 31 .8 26.7 73.1 -- 66.7
H�!��'�"`QQR Sf¯�°UV T 81.3+ �W��±�²T 11.7+$�G
1.10#
� 1.10,-�������
����
�� �� 3456 78 9 :;<= 7> .BCD EF
101� 100.0 62.6 18.2 - 7.1 11.1 1.0
102� 100.0 81.8 11.3 - 2.7 3.8 0.3
103� 100.0 81.3 11.7 0.3 1.8 4.4 0.5
-22-
).+�/�
stBC!�.D E�Fl-GCH) I%¡JC�'�K L�MNst¡JOPÒ
QRS%TUV��ÙÚLW'ÛÜÙÚH� �����X¡¢ /Yf¢¡J'st!��
� Z[s\/%��]Q ^�_`aC�¾bcd�aefg d 91� 2hijkv���
��»st!���Ø *ls\��]QØmu�ls\� noØm pqrst!�� st
*n�l�fstmu�l.uvstm �Hwx�Ost��wx�OstQ*mÑsty(
$
103�/%� !���8 68� 9 102�:; 17��: 33.3+#$D&!��!� 66�
��?@mzX!�� 33� m{�|w�[� w¥¦m}~<�X>&` 33�$�G 1.11#
� 1.11 ���
����
��
���� ��,
!�"
# �
$�"
# �!�� ��
-�1
� �
�1
��
01
��
2�
101� 2 52 47 26 - 20 1 7
102� 7 51 50 30 - 19 1 8
103� 8 68 66 33 - 33 - 10
103 �C*%>&mzX!� 33 � H!��ÕQR�!��Õ����S��ÏÐ8þ#
S��w���st��wù¥'��������É 6@É 1ýÉ 2�#8 25�{�k�WH
¨���w���Ø�st'tÎCwµs�N �̀É 5�#8 19����stC��ÑCw
���st��C`�É 4�#7����st��`�É 1�#3����w���st'��
w�z�Q'tw³�`�É 3�#8 3�$�G 1.12���Ê 103�mzX!���f�G#
� 1.12 �������
����
��
-�1
����
������(7)KL<S 6TS 1�)
S 1� S 2� S 3� S 4� S 5�
101� 26 2 21 6 2 16
102� 30 5 21 2 9 18
103� 33 3 25 3 7 19
103�� 102�
���%�
10.0 -40.0 19.0 50.0 -22.2 5.6
����±��²2����³´����±�³´������±�����
)0+1,2/ $�
� ���������
� 3!1,2/ $456%
-23-
).+�/�
� ���
� �������
)0+1,2/ $�
�MNÑtÙÚ`�~�'���� ÛÜTUÙÚ�R p����`�K ������
>'zXrS�����ïð��wñÎ��TU�R'������ Lª©������É 14
@~ 7�����';¡]QI� �Kl5yC�����K pC%]Q` Nm�¢×
$
103�st/%-ù������� 8� 9 102�:; 4� �! 7�� 3 ������
��]Q��3 �£¤# 4 ����¥0����]Qsý�k81 �F 103 �A������C
D&!�8 186� �� 174��������]Q��131�£¤# 12��¥0����]Qs
ý$�G 1.13�G 1.14#
� 1.13 ���������
����
��
���� ����
!�"
# �$�"
# �
!�
��
�� ���� ����
���
�� � �� ��
��
��
01
��
101� 2 10 12 9 8 - - 1 3 -
102� - 4 4 - - - - - 4 -
103� - 8 7 3 3 - - - 4 1
� 1.14 3!1,2/ $456%
����
�� ����
����� ����(7)KL<S 14TS 1�)
S 1� S 2� S 3� S 5�
101� 8 4 1 1 4
102� - - - - -
103� 3 - - - 3
����µ�\��²2����³´����³´������¶·����
EF 103�A C*%]Q'����¦§H&`8 10� �� 6��¨©�P©�ª«�
¬�P®¯¥���°=±�� ²���stPV�³ðÁÂtk2 ��wx�O��´�µ
����k1 ���¶�¤|¸����st�O=±¯¥·¸����]Q� ����Õ©
������É 14@É 1ýÉ 5�¡¢ ¹º«Q»u=±i%�LM¥w¼½�»u�°¾¿�
:;�°�oàR&� �Kl5yC��K o<À{]Qk1 ��ÁÂèÄÅÆÇx���
ÇÈ��ÑÀÉ�ÑfÉp���� ©������É 14@É 1ýÉ 1�¡¢$�G 1.15#
��� 100�¸¹ºµ�\����¹ºµ�\�¶·���»¼µ�\�¶·��s���
-24-
� 1.15 �������� �
��103��
���� ���
�
�
���
�������
� �
1��������� !�"#$%& 101.01.01' 103.12.31 6 ( 14�( 1�( 5�)
( 15�( 2�
2.��������*+�"#$%&
�,-�./�
101.02.29' 104.02.28 44 ( 14�( 1�( 5�)
( 15�( 2�
3.��������*+�"#$%&
� 012/�
101.06.01' 104.05.31 5 ( 14�( 1�( 5�)
( 15�( 2�
3���������45�"#$%&
�67/�
101.09.01' 104.08.31 6 ( 14�( 1�( 5�)
( 15�( 2�
8���������9!�"#$%& 101.10.01' 104.09.30 42 ( 14�( 1�( 5�)
( 15�( 2�
:���������45�"#$%&;
�<7/�
103.03.13' 106.03.12 6 ( 14�( 1�( 5�)
( 15�( 2�
7.����=�>��?@ 102.01.01' 104.12.31 29 ( 14�( 1�( 1�)
( 15�( 2�
8.��/0A�BC?=�>�. 101.03.24' 104.03.01 8 ( 14�( 1�( 1�)( 2�
( 15�( 2�
9.�����"$DEFGHI�J
�GK%&LMNO��?@
103.09.29' 106.09.28 13 ( 14�( 1�( 5�)
( 15�( 2�
10.��PQRS9TUVWXYZ��
[\)]^_`)^a`bc��?
@
101.07.02' 104.07.01 5 ( 14�( 1�( 1�)
( 15�( 2�
�������
� �����������
� ������������� �!�
-25-
� �������� ��������
��������� �������������������� �!"#$%&
'()*��+,-.��$/-001�23�456789��:�;<�103 =��$%;
<� 374>�?@ 103=AB�� 2,972>$%;<��C�D�EB 2,838>�FGHIJEB
134>K
103=D� 314>:(L)��BMN 2,245OP�Q<9RS 1,036TKU�>�VWXY�
Z[-\]��X7$%;<�>B 67>:(L)�^_`�Xa 68 >�Q�X9R 100 Tbcd
Fe[-9fghi��jklmngopqrs9>_tEB 227 >:(L)��uvwxyz�
{w�8g|}~���\����7�>B 20>K^� 1.16b
� 1.16 �����������
���
de
fgh
ifg ?Efj 6klm no p(q)h
r
fgs
r
fg�
(�)
101d 102 107 190 112 7 118 39
102d 102 104 153 110 1 71 85
103d 67 68 100 99 3 125 20
��1.� ����������������� �
2.� !"#$�%&'()��*+�,-.��/01��23��
U 103=$%;<�Xa��[-7I���XY����v�g�O����I� 32>��
�sP�h-��P��I�^�[���+,-*��P��/-b16>n��g����I
� 9>K^� 1.17b
� 1.17������������� �!�
���
de
tulm
fgs
r
vw�����
xy
z{
?@
|}?@
(( 10�)
~�?@
(( 11�)
��?@
(( 14�)
���_
��?@
(( 18�)
����
z{?@
(( 19�)
i��
z{
?@
101d 107 19 - - 14 4 2 61
102d 104 6 - 1 4 1 - 57
103d 68 12 2 2 2 3 3 40
de
vw�����
vw
���
��
���
?@
vwq
�M-
���
?@
��
���
��?@
(( 23�)
( 23�c
1'c 4)
no
(( 41�
��)
( 43�)
��o�
���
����
?@
(( 20�)
��iY
���
� ¡¢
?@
(( 21�)
£¤o�
J�=¥
?@
(( 22�)
¦§�
¨©��
?@
(( 24�)
101d - 57 - 4 26 1 - -
102d - 52 1 5 40 2 - -
103d - 32 - 9 2 - 14 -
��4567�89:3� �;<=� �$>?!@� �A� 2BCD7�EF�
-26-
三、處分案件
103 年檢舉案件及本會依職權主動調查之公平交易案件計發出處分書 150 件,較 102 年減少 64
件(減 29.9%),依處分書所載行為態樣觀察(涉及多項違法行為案件經重複計算後),屬限制競
爭行為者占 18.0%,不公平競爭行為者占 63.3%,非法多層次傳銷行為(含違反公平交易法及多層
次傳銷管理法)占 18.7%。(表 1.18)
表 1.18 處分案件統計-按違法行為別分 單位:件
年別
處分書 件 數
違反公平交易法 限制 競爭 行為
獨占行為
(第 10 條)
結合行為
(第 11 條)
聯合行為
(第 14 條)
約定轉售價格行為(第 18 條)
妨礙公平 競爭行為 (第 19 條)
不公平競 爭行 為
101 年 203 28 - 1 18 4 6 129 102 年 214 29 3 6 7 10 3 132 103 年 150 27 2 5 6 8 6 95
年別
違反公平交易法 違 反 多層次 傳 銷 管理法 行 為
違 反個 人資 料保護法行 為
非 法多 層 次傳銷行為
(第 23 條、第 23 條之1 至之 4)
其他
(第 41 條 後段、 第 43 條)
仿冒他人 商 品 或 服務表徵 行 為 (第 20 條)
虛偽不實 或 引 人 錯誤廣告 行 為 (第 21 條)
損害他人營業信譽行 為
(第 22 條)
欺 罔 或顯失公平行 為
(第 24 條)
101 年 - 110 1 20 46 2 - - 102 年 - 108 1 25 51 3 - - 103 年 - 74 - 26 5 1 23 -
說明:部分案件違法行為達二種以上,因此各違法行為處分件數加總超過處分總件數。
觀察 103 年處分之業別,以批發及零售業 46.7%為最高(其中其他無店面零售業占 28.0%),
較 102 年減少 11.7 個百分點,其次為不動產業占 23.3%,則較 102 年增加 12.6 個百分點。(表 1.19)
表 1.19 處分案之行業別結構 單位:%
年別 總計
農林 漁牧業 、礦業及
土石採取業
製造業 電力及燃氣
供應業
用水供應及污染
整治業
營造業批發及
零售業運輸及 倉儲業
住宿及 餐飲業
資訊及 通訊 傳播業
101 年 100.0 1.5 15.3 1.5 1.5 - 53.2 1.5 3.0 4.4 102 年 100.0 - 11.7 0.9 - 0.9 58.4 1.9 2.8 7.5 103 年 100.0 2.0 10.0 0.7 - 0.7 46.7 3.3 2.7 3.3
年別 金融及 保險業
不動產業
專業、 科學及 技術 服務業
支援 服務業
公共行政
及國防;
強制性
社會安全
教育
服務業
醫療保健
及社會
工作 服務業
藝術、娛樂
及休閒
服務業
其他 服務業
其他不
能歸類
之行業
或個人
101 年 1.0 7.4 5.4 3.0 - - - 0.5 1.0 - 102 年 0.5 10.7 1.4 - - - - 0.5 2.8 - 103 年 - 23.3 0.7 - - 1.3 - 1.3 4.0 -
-27-
����
� ��������� �!�
� �������
103=[���+,-.��$/-0Q�X79RB 207T�� 102=�� 114T^� 35.5
�b�UI���� ^)*��[-I�79RC¡¢B£¤b�i¥¦� I�E��v¶·
I� 38T¸�civ��� I�E����v�g�O����I� 90T¸��sP���
g����I� 27Tcih-��P��I�^�[���+,-*��P��/-bB 28T
K^� 1.20b
� 1.20 ��"#����� �!�
����
de
fg
�
vw�����
xy
z{
?@
|}?@
(( 10�)
~�?@
(( 11�)
��?@
(( 14�)
���_
��?@
(( 18�)
����
z{?@
(( 19�)
i��
z {
? @
101d 355 142 - 1 132 4 6 167
102d 321 81 3 8 57 10 3 187
103d 207 68 2 12 38 8 8 111
de
vw�����
v w
���
� �
���
? @
v w
q �
M -
���
? @
� �
� � �
��?@
(( 23�)
( 23�c
1'c 4)
n o
(( 41�
��)
( 43�)
��o�
� � �
����
? @
(( 20�)
��iY
� � �
� ¡¢
? @
(( 21�)
£¤o�
J�=¥
? @
(( 22�)
¦ § �
¨©��
? @
(( 24�)
101d - 141 1 27 46 2 - -
102d - 142 1 46 51 3 - -
103d - 90 - 27 5 1 23 -
��� ��5G7�HIBCD?@JK5G7�83��LMNO� M���
¹º�>[-I�7»³XY^¼½7»³�¾¿�ÀE��¡¢B£b�103=ÁÂÃÄg
ÅÆ[-I�EB 60>^¼½��+,-Ç 13È 4>nÇ 41È 46>nÇ 42È 2>n��P��
/-Ç 32@ 34È 8>b���»É 147>^sJ¼½��+,-Ç 40È 5>nÇ 41ÈÇ 1�
113>nÇ 41ÈÇ 2� 2>nÇ 42ÈÇ 2� 1>nÇ 42ÈÇ 3�Z[���P��/Ê- 5>
n��P��/-Ç 32@ 35È 24>b�Ë�ÌÍ�»ÉÎÏSÐÑÒ 61Ó 8,209ÔÕ�sJ
¥¦� I�ÐÑÒ 61Ó 3,846ÔÕ^sJÖ9T~×ØÙrÚÛ;ÜÝÞØ7ßØàá·I
��âǾP¡�¼-�XÐÑÒ 60.1ÓÕb�v��� I�ÐÑÒ 3,098ÔÕK^� 1.21b
� 1.21 ������$%�
���
de
fgs
r
ª«¬k�®?@ f¯°±
����� �����
���
( 32' 34�
q�M-
���
( 47)48�
�����
( 13� ( 41� ( 42� ( 40�
( 41�
( 1�
101d 203 1 106 19 - - 1 154
102d 214 6 69 21 - - 5 148
103d 150 4 46 2 8 - 5 113
-28-
� 1.21 ������$%�&'(
���
de
f¯°± ²k³´f�)ª«
µ¶)·¸�ª�¹
)�ºv�»¼
(q�M-���
(25�)
½°
¾�¿�
(q�M-��
�(50�)
�����
�����
���( 32
' 35�
q�M-
���(
47' 49�
( 41�
( 2�
( 42�
( 2�
( 42�
( 3�
( 43�
101d - 2 38 1 - - - -
102d 2 4 51 1 - - - -
103d 1 - 5 - 24 - - -
��¦§47�80¨©:ª?«� �$¬K¦§�LM�
�����
��&ã[���+,-.��$/-079R}Iä�X7�¥��åæQ�X9R7�6
�U 89= 7ç�è7Ðéê-01�vë��Iä�XìíIäîïðéêK 103=Iäîéê
�ñQ��+,-.��$/-0éê�> 85>�µB 102=AòV 25>�HI�éê�>B
110>��V 90>�sJóôéê 70>�Í�õ�X 12>�éêvQ 8>K89= 7ç@ 103
=AÄäîéê�ñQéê�>B 2,094>�öV 2,074>K^� 1.22b
� 1.22 )*��������
���
de
ÀÁr Â~r SÃÄÅÆ�g
Çd
È~
hr
Éd
È~
hr
Çd
ÀÁ
hr
ÊË
ÌÍ
ÄÅ
�
Ïfg
ÄÅ
iÁ�
ÄÅ
ÎÍ
7gÄ
ÅÌÍ
7gi
Á�
7g
ÄÅÌÍ
7gÏf
g�
Ïfg
7g
�
101d 29 155 147 119 17 11 - - - - 37
102d 37 100 112 81 8 11 1 2 9 - 25
103d 25 85 90 70 12 8 - - - - 20
� 101= 9ç 6÷ðIäéøù�Å�úû¾����Iäéø�>�Çü��¬.Iä-î
�d´µýþ-îIäéø�K101 = 9 ç@ 103 =Aýþ-îIäéø����+,-.�
�$/-0�>öV 8>�sJ 5>�euóô�1>v-óô�1>Íô�1>z�¬.Iä
-îK
d 89= 7ç�èЦéê-*Iäéø-¤�?@ 103=A¬.Iä-î���+,-.�
������
� +,-������. �!�
-29-
� ������$%�&'(
�����
� )*��������
�$/-0�>öV 849>�sJv-óô 80>�euóô 592>�õ�X*éê�1�Í�
98>�Íô 30>�éê�1*õ�X��XÍ� 32>�õ�X�XÍ�s�õ�7éóô 3>�
éê�1n�éê�1*õ�X�Í� 2>�éê�1n�éê�1*õ�X�XÍ� 1>�éê
�1Í�*õ�s�7éóô 2>�s 9>K
89= 7ç@ 103=A�¬Iä-î���+,-.��$/-0�>öV>�B 472>�s
Jv-óô 125>�euóô 261>�õ��_ô¬.Iä-î 72>�õ��!��
� 6>�Íô 2 >�õ�Xnéê*�éê�1�Í� 1 >��Xõ��_ô¬.Iä-î
*�X��óô 1>�s 4>K
������
103=���X��CéêgIäéø¤Í�õ�X�> 2>c� 81=�� B@ 103=AÄ
�X�>B 4,178>�Í�^��Xõ�XÍ�b168>����X�>^��õ�X�X���>
*ãIä����ò�17�>b4,036>���õ�Xá� 96.6�K^� 1.23b
� 1.23 +,-������. �!�
���
Ïfg
de
�
fgs
r
ÐI�����
|}?@
(( 10�)
��?@
(( 14�)
����
z{?@
(( 19�)
��iY�
���
¡¢?@
(( 21�)
¦§�¨©
��?@
(( 24�)
101d 13 - 6 - 3 3
102d 4 1 2 - - -
103d 2 1 - 1 - -
��1.®¯� �°±²� ®¯�� ²� ®¯�
2.®¯� ��;KAG7�83³:$>?!@� �A�IBCD7�+´®¯� µ¶·AG7� (¸
¹®¯¦º) �
-30-
���������
������
U���P��/Ê-* 103= 1ç 29÷��èI7��P��/-��}�9��P�
�9R�ìã×R�í�����103 =Ð��9RT� 126 T�Í���T� 141 T�?@ 103
=A��79RT�B 414TK(� 2.1)
� 2.1� ���������
����
de
ÉdÑ
ÒÓ�
Çd
ÒÓ�
Çd
��
ÇdÑ
ÒÓ�
101d 414 143 143 414
102d 414 145 130 429
103d 429 126 141 414
U��P��9R���GýXY��Ñ�� 182T�§ 44.0�����ÑJ� 81T�§ 19.6
�¸Ç¾�¬ � 43T�§ 10.4�¸Çú��ÀúE§ 74.0%�!"��P��9R�ãO#$
%�&�'_tK̂ � 2.2b
� 2.2 /012-"#�3
ÔÕe
�
ÔÕe
�
ÔÕe
�
103dÑ 102dÑ 103dÑ 102dÑ 103dÑ 102dÑ
Ê; Ë 414 429
Ö×Ø 39 35 ÖÙÚ 3 2 ÛQÚ - -
Û×Ø 182 183 ÜÝÚ 4 2 ÞßÚ - -
àáØ 35 36 âãÚ 2 3 äåÚ - -
Û6Ø 81 93 <æÚ 1 1 çèØ 1 2
Û<Ø 15 17 éêÚ 1 1 ÖÙØ 1 1
ëìØ 43 47 íîÚ - - íîØ - -
ïðÚ 3 4 ñQÚ 3 2 òóôõö - -
��103� 12» 25¼½¾¿À�ÁÂ�þÄ�
��������
� � � �����������
� 4 #56�789����:;!�
-31-
���������
������
� � ���������
� /012-"#�3
��������
�()��P��7I�þ*Ì��v+RE5½���,-7./�01���&ã��P
��R7C×��2Ö3¯<4ânÖ9�5lâ7]-�67�}89/��&���:v;�
�+,-�17��P��/Ê-�* 103= 1ç 29÷��èI7��P��/-E�<=s
¥>ÅÆ �?v1>@A�B����C��<sì�D�a¯EF��G<4RE���×R
I�����:HI{;�$%_JKL�SM9�5l78WK
����P��RN�<7&O�PI�<7��P��9R �Q�R�XC~��SgT
�pHüUVWs×XYZ7��P��9R�103=|�< 48T��9R�![1sJ 12T9
R�w�<LE{y9��sJ;01EB 15T�§ 31.3��8\]^_`abE 17T�§ 35.4
�cv01��;<E 15T�§ 31.3��sõZ�a¯cdÝ��e>v{; 11T���$f
×Rg�ò�D(3)a¯EF 4TP7K^� 2.3n� 2.4b
� 2.3� � �����������
����
de
÷m ÷m~ø
�
ù�ú�
i�ú�
ûhlm
»üýþ
����
�È
J$
¬� ��i�
101d 57 16 22 8 2 2 7
102d 60 16 27 15 - 1 1
103d 48 15 15 17 - 1 -
� 2.44 #56�789����:;!�
����
de
i�
ú�
�
i�ú�Ï
���
È �Y
¢�î�
s���
ôÒÓ�
ri�ù
����
È ù �
ú �
t �
J���
ÈÓj(�)
s�M-
ÈÒÓ
�J�
ÒÓ��
��È
Y Z !
Ò Ó
no
101d 22 3 3 3 4 1 19 2
102d 27 1 4 2 4 1 19 1
103d 15 - 11 1 4 - - 1
"�#7g�i�ú�$ 2�¯É%&'Ï�Ê()i�ú�Ê� *
-32-
����������
103=��]��X7h-��P��I�B 28>^� 102=�� 23>b�Q�X79RB
27T^hB»ÉhÏS 445ÔÕb�[���+,-�17��P��/Ê-E 5>�[���
P��/-E 23>�sJ�[���P��/-Ç 7ÈòU01,?�� 14>¸i�sP�
[�Ç 6È� 4>K^� 2.5n� 2.6b
� 2.5� ��� �������� !"#$%&�'(�
���
de fgsr ( 23�
( 23�
c 1
( 23�
c 2
( 23�
c 3
( 23�c 4
(�����
����)
101d 46 - - 2 - 45
102d 51 - 2 3 1 51
103d 5 - - - - 5
"�#7gfghr+,^-vw�����I���������*
� 2.6 � ������)� !"'(�
(<)/012-=�> ���
de
fgs
r
( 5� ( 7� ( 11� ( 12� ( 13� ( 14� ( 15�
101d 45 13 25 2 15 2 - 1
102d 51 8 38 - 4 1 1 -
103d 5 2 3 - - - - -
de ( 16� ( 17� ( 18� ( 19� ( 20� ( 22� ( 23�
101d 4 - 2 - 2 3 -
102d 8 - 2 1 - 3 -
103d - - - - - - -
(?)/012-=�
de
fgs
r
( 6� ( 7� ( 9� ( 10� ( 11� ( 12� ( 13�
103d 23 4 14 - 1 - 1 -
de ( 14� ( 15� ( 16� ( 17� ( 18� ( 19� ( 20�
103d 2 - 3 - - - 1
de ( 21� ( 22� ( 23� ( 24� ( 25� ( 26� ( 28� ( 38�
103d 2 - - 2 - - - -
"�#1.7gfghrvw��$ 2.¯É%&'v����Ê()fgÊr *
2.�������� 103d 1/ 290�ºZ?*
���������
���� �
� 4 @ABCD���
� � *+�� ,-��
4
-33-
����������
� � ��� �������� !"#$%&�'(�
� � ������)� !"'(�
< /012-=�>
? /012-=�
���������
���� �
��jA�k����lxm�sX]nopk7þ*�º��¡fèäHI�kKjA�
k$fj�U��01-Ç 9È01B} 6qrs�k��+,*��P��/äln�k��
+,*��P��/-0n�4��+,-*��P��/-èäBtn�4��+,-*�
�P��/-7���nu'�*�X�njAï�7�k*sU-ìujA�k�k9�K
103=��jA�k4vw 52P��kï�B 560>��R��� 391>^69.8%b��k�
169>^§ 30.2%bc��xP�kï� 10.8>�sJ�k� 3.3>���� 7.5>K^� 3.1b
� 3.14 @ABCD���
����P
de
ÊË Ò¢h 12h
r ~K3 r ~K3 r ~K3
101d 677 100.0 480 70.9 197 29.1
102d 571 100.0 425 74.4 146 25.6
103d 560 100.0 391 69.8 169 30.2
103= 169>�k�yz-X����*$%;<�B 85>n-0 30>n{|*{�� 30>
n|}� 1>*s 23>KU�k8~XY���<p 106>^§ 62.7�bn�Æ<p 33>^§
19.5�bn���k 4>^§ 2.4�bns 26>^§ 15.4�bK^� 3.2n� 3.1 b
� 3.2� *+�� ,-��
����P
de ÊË �ú
4h
Ë5
÷6hI
tulm
��
(Ò)h
�7hp8
9:
no
101d 197 47 - 109 23 - - 18
102d 146 21 - 89 15 - 4 17
103d 169 30 - 85 30 1 - 23
de ~K3
101d 100.0 23.9 - 55.3 11.7 - - 9.1
102d 100.0 14.4 - 61.0 10.3 - 2.7 11.6
103d 100.0 17.8 - 50.3 17.8 0.6 - 13.6
4
-34-
��!"#�$#%&
103=��xPjA�k�½��� 2�� 6X�� 102=�� 3X��U�k�½��XY
��ò� 2���§ 46.2�����sP� 2��@ò� 3���§ 44.2�K^� 3.3b
� 3.3� ./0+1234��
-
103d 102d
;� 3<�=� ;� 3<�=�
Ê Ë 52 100.00 53 100.00
È> 29- 24 46.2 18 34.0
2'È> 39- 23 44.2 24 45.3
3'È> 49- 5 9.6 11 20.8
4'È> 59- - - - -
5'È> 69- - - - -
69-¯É - - - -
������������ ��
��'()*+,-�
&<(E5FG��
� 4 E5FGE5HI��
&?(JK�=LMN>��
� 4 JK�=LMN>#5��
-35-
��!"#�$#%&
� � ./0+1234��
������������ ��
��'()*+,-�
&<(E5FG��
�µ�~�}y��+,��ëN�´H�I��+,RN8(���*Iäî��·ëN
J���D}ëN�#�W�~�g9R}y��$/-0�:*èä7����K��ëNJ�
]Rf±�ëN���Rs��$/-0W�n��EF7ï�n{|9��W�*�S�>�Q
K103 =ï�ëN 8,912 >�� 102 =�� 8.3��ëN���ï���$/-0W��$K̂ �
4.1b
� 4.14 E5FGE5HI��
���
de ÊË
Ç;t�
�ú?"
@AM-
BC
���
?"
wDhr
Á�
101d 10,619 8,821 328 1,042 428
102d 9,717 8,013 308 1,084 312
103d 8,912 7,490 206 857 359
&?(JK�=LMN>��
��&ýþ$/xy�I��+,{yRN}�bÝ9�7��!�º{yRNj|ýþxy
� Ê�103=ýþ$/xy� Ê��+,RNB 905>�sJ¡ï�a�EF 261>�¡
¢�> 127>�Ê���£� 18gP�� ¤f 43>�<f9� 18>�¤¥²REF 56>�
:�¦B;< 24>*s 358>K^� 4.2b
� 4.24 JK�=LMN>#5��
103= ���
GHe ÊË
¾BC
s�M-
¾�
hr
��@A
"�;
����
EF
³b
mb
�
³´
G�M-
ph
HËlm
no
ÊË; 905 261 127 18 43 18 56 24 358
Ö×ØEF; 103 8 23 1 18 5 12 1 35
Û×ØEF; 80 25 24 1 5 1 1 5 18
Û6ØEF; 26 0 8 1 2 1 5 2 7
Û<ØEF; 49 14 10 1 1 0 5 0 18
ëìØEF; 17 0 6 1 0 0 1 1 8
I8 ÚØEF; 602 205 52 12 17 11 32 15 258
òóÚEF; 26 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 13
JKÚEF; 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
-36-
&O(PQRSTUVWXFG#5��
��ã 86= 1ç��Ö� älEF*§¨J�â�ï��©}y� älÝ� -:R��
n§¨*ª«ëN�>��{y�G01}y¬� älEF®�¯°K103=�I�8¹±s
1.¤¥�²� älEF�ï�:R��ëNs?@ 103=AB¤¥� äl:Ra³´ 2Ô 2µ
¶n>· 45 ¿�!yç?ÐÖ��-¸�<�¹¦â*ÖAPEC � älEF®â�º� ä
lEF®1>¤¥ APEC 21L�A»EF���©<�K
2.ï�� älª«ëN�¼I� äl½s(1)¾|§¨� -7:Tn¿EHI:LÀÁ�103
=B�Ê 12gP�´ 450OPÂÝK(2)Ã&q¿ÄÊÖ��+,-ª«×Ý��P��/-ª
«×âB7gP�4420OPÂÝK
3.ÅÆ� -Ý� äl{y·Ç�ï�¿È§¨ÂÉÝ�G+Ês103=ÅÆÖ��+,<ËâJ
ÌeÍç·� 6>�Î��� �q:îÏ�aÐ.¿ÈxmÑÒK��+,jA�ØÓ�ã 103
= 4ç 16÷_IÇ 1>�xçÇ 1Ô*Ç 3Ô7Õ>ú`·��R:LÀÁn�G%�nÖ±�
Pn�Ð×Ø*��+,Ù·.�:�ÚÛO�´ 4,000OK
��./012� 345
&<(YZVW[>�\]
���©�ÜÝW��{y-070l�:�103 ="#Ê�����X¨Ã&üÞßàR
Ená1IRREnâ=¿Änã.äå*�Jæç0èvwz-���é%�BÊ 109gP�
��£��sJ���I�Ê 70gP�j|ýþ$/xyÊ 18gP���Q¾@AÁê��{
y-0} 21gPK^� 4.3b
� 4.34 ^_`a YZ��
���ÅÆ
de ÊË Ç;L?6�M�Ô4
t�GH��
M�G�
NO��
noÁPQR
�����
101d 109 65 18 - 26
102d 111 76 19 - 16
103d 109 70 18 - 21
&?(WbcMd V��e�:%
�ZìC�_tÝë�,ìíî����-���z*o£ï���U�ð=� "�Ê�C
ñ�!Âò�G�� -�_tóô*���-Ý�-�P��õ§ÚÝ�Æ��Ó-*�>�
�67'()*8
4
-37-
&O(PQRSTUVWXFG#5��
��./012� 345
&<(YZVW[>�\]
� 4 ^_`a YZ��
&?(WbcMd V��e�:%
õ³��ï¬���>�ö8�´H�-8(K103 =C�-�÷{yÓ-*���õ³7�
:��ÆnÚ1*Ä7Ó-*�õ³�Rsø
1.�ÆÖ��+,jA�ï�äùEËñàúûâK
2.�ÆÖÎüýþ�CV�>�<Ê-âK
3.Ú1Ö��P��/-èI�³âK
4.�ÆÖ��+,-èI�³âK
5.ÄÖ��P��/Ê-âK
6.�ÆÖ��P��RÚ1LOE����3�²Bt*RNöĤLOEF�þ-]RÊ-âK
7.Ú1Ö��P��9R��*,?��û³âK
8.Ú1Ö��P��9R�N��ìC�Bç<4�f7×RÏ�ÏâK
9.Ú1Ö��P��å²xm��*/Ê-âK
10.�ÆÖ��+,jA�&ã��P���>7�õ³âK
11.ÄÖ��P��9R��*,?��p=âK
12.�ÆÖ��+,jA�&ãV{��>7�õ³âK
13.�ÆÖ��+,jA��I�fìIqr9�âK
14.�ÆÖ��+,jA�ÊV{��>7�ÊùâK
15.�ÆÖ��+,jA�&ã����Ï��>7�õ³âK
16.�ÆÖ��+,jA�V{��>& �r"ìIqr9�âK
17.�ÆÖ��+,jA�&ãj�T�*¡ß�>7�õ³âK
18.�ÆÖ��+,jA�&ã�«��«I��>7�õ³â̂ õ��s��+,jA�&ã�
«��«I�70l�£bK
�67'()*8
��+,-� 80= 2ç 4÷¦1�81= 2ç 4÷èI���|� 20=��ã´=��� ë
C����,ï��pµ�ZìÝ;Ü����&JI��+,-�3¯�÷*�Æ��ÚÖ��
+,-�Æ��â�� ²n�n¿�©r"�����§k¤�ã 101= 6ç 19÷�|Iäî�
<�CIäî 101= 12ç 6÷Ç 3326Pî��<<p�!� 101= 12ç 13÷îÑC Ç 1010149963
!`|�-î�kKC�-îC�jA�ã 103= 5ç 12÷* 5ç 26÷vw"P�<��º��
Æ��*�-jA#$%n&'Jn()*n+,�.O7{yï����<�ã 104 = 1 ç 22
÷�-îÇ 8- 6�>Ç 19P�kú.<p�!C ø h¦ 104= 2ç 4÷/hü0 Ç 10400014311
!Â��èIK4
�P�Æ�:$f}1Iäî01Å2n;Ü-ÈVm»¹!�Ú�I�r37�:n�ï
$/xy�-�¥nï4Iä»5�8(.�¡±�Rs
^üb�Æ9R710K̂ �ÆÈeÇ 2Èb
^¾b�Æ��xy���!6�ýþ$/xy701K̂ �ÆÈeÇ 6È.b
-38-
^úb�Æ7§9R7T1úûK̂ �ÆÈeÇ 8Èb
^8b�ÆV{y01K̂ �ÆÈeÇ 10È@Ç 12Èb
^9b�Æ·I�{y01K̂ �ÆÈeÇ 14È@Ç 18Èb
^:b£e;Ä¥¦¢«<=I��´Ú>a�!û½ãëNK̂ �ÆÈeÇ 19Èb
^?b�Æ£19Rv��v¶@<� gsAB� I�cd�B�7v¶����I
�zCv��� :DK̂ �ÆÈeÇ 20ÈÇ 3E*Ç 23Èb
^Fb�Æ9R�9RÂÝ¥¦�g� I�70lK̂ �ÆÈeÇ 20ÈÇ 4Eb
^Gb6�JIÈeÇ 19ÈÇ 5E�ôH×RI%-0lK
^Jb�Æv���I�0lK̂ �ÆÈeÇ 21Èb
^Jüb�ÆKLI�0lK̂ �ÆÈeÇ 22Èb
^J¾bдJÄ;<¦�K̂ �ÆÈeÇ 28Èb
^Júb»³�:r3ïK̂ �ÆÈeÇ 39ÈnÇ 40È*Ç 42Èb
^J8b´Ú¥¦� I�5���8� 5=701K̂ �ÆÈeÇ 41Èb
^J9b£1wR��gsM»7�A�7�»K̂ �ÆÈeÇ 43Èb
^J:b´Ú��+,-�>)�éêù�701K̂ �ÆÈeÇ 48Èb
�9:;�����<38=02:>?@8
&<(f9g/012-=� h
JI��P��9R*sI�7/�$fnU���+,-Ç 23È@Ç 23È7 4.Èe*
sê�Ú17��P��/Ê-{y01KN��P��7/�wDã��+,-J7�0l
�¶On}s�P7�-QRKSã��+,-i� -z-�$fG0l¥¦� Ýv���
I��Ý��P��I�7/¦z-}¨�&ã[-I�75�úûÝTUÈ>Q}vw����
N��P��/701V7�-�§�Ö��P��/-��âK
�-�W�Xã 100= 6çCIäî`|�-î�k��-îC�jA�YXvw�<��Z
ò(ãÇ 7 -�-jA[>�D��k�Z\��º���:¡I��¤��Pã 101 = 6 ç 19
÷N3��|Iäî�k�CIäî 101= 12ç 6÷Ç 3326Pî��<<p�ã 101= 12ç 11
÷îÑC Ç 1010153224 !`�|�-î�kKC 103 = 1ç 14 ÷�-îÇ 8 -Ç 4 �>Ç 18
P�kD�¾nú.ù��!C ø h¦ 103= 1ç 29÷/hü0 Ç 10300013741!Â��èI
K�-nNJIÖ��+,-âJ}y��P��/701�]`V7�-�!NJIÖ��P
��/Ê-âï4M-^_���ï��P��7/�¡±�Rs
1.�-�-��n$/xy*½`10K̂ Ç 1È@Ç 5Èb
2.��P��9R7��n,?*ÃÄ�è7��K̂ Ç 6È@Ç 9Èb
3.��P��9R&��à7�=*�£0NK̂ Ç 10È@Ç 12Èb
4.a¯Âµcd7aV*�:K̂ Ç 13È*Ç 14Èb
&?(i9g/012-=� h�cMd
��A�BC)DEF
&<(jkl�`m
-39-
�9:;�����<38=02:>?@8
&<(f9g/012-=� h
5.��à7[d9u*�þ*K̂ Ç 15Èb
6.��P��9Rv�bceI�(dO���à�*bc¥¦I�(dO���à7f*01K
^Ç 16Èb
7.��P��9R�NEF7ef0NK̂ Ç 17Èb
8.,-��P��*v¶��I�7;ÄK̂ Ç 18È*Ç 19Èb
9.��àW�cdÝöÄcd7-1È>�*ZW�cdÝöÄcd\Ä7�50NK̂ Ç 20È*
Ç 21Èb
10.��P��9Rv�|îZcdW�göÄ�Qg3hig[dÎ�!v�Aj��àÊk
`klK̂ Ç 22È*Ç 23Èb
11.�-W�cd*öÄcd:DãëN78~û½7K̂ Ç 24Èb
12.$/xy7RN�<nU-;<*5�ù�K̂ Ç 25È@Ç 28Èb
13.[��-7m9»�*Iä»�K̂ Ç 29È@ 35Èb
14.�-èI�hi��+,-Ç 8È�1��P��9R¼½�-7nÆ01K̂ Ç 36Èb
15.�-èI�|í$/xy��7��P��9Rì1�-01�ÆÊ,?��7nÆ01
K̂ Ç 37Èb
16.�1C��7��P��9R��å²xm�ÊD���7��P��9RÝ��à�6å
æ* k�RNK̂ Ç 38Èb
17.��+,-)*�-7{yÈe���-èI7÷ð�v¼½7K̂ Ç 39Èb
&?(i9g/012-=� h�cMd
1�wÖ��P��/-â7��èI���D�Ú1��P��/-èI�³n��
P��9R��*,?��û³n��P��9R�N��ìC�Bç<4�f7×RÏ�Ï*�
�P��å²xm��*/Ê-��Æ��+,-èI�³n��P��RÚ1LOE����
3�²Bt*RNöĤLOEF�þ-]RÊ-�Ä��P��/Ê-.-0ÁÂc!�
��Æ��+,jA�&ã��P���>7�õ³�Ä��P��9R��*,?��p=
.Iä0³�} ã��P��/-¦7D�K
��A�BC)DEF
&<(jkl�`m
SãC�3oïÝ�Gï��X9R7¥¦� p�Ýq��� p�Q}{&�Gïóô�
��"#rt�� -$/xy{s]7x��103 =��t��uvwxyxzn{|�
hx�A{}�~���QÝ��*÷�� -$/xyHI��¬�iz*ß]�û���Ã
&�þ-¦*�-Ht+�r"K\ �����Ý��n°��n-�n��nµ�qn��5
*���.��x� -]�k^1b/���K103 = 12 ç?G +�� ±�D�ÖÞ-�
-VW¼½���âÐd�à�x�\�Ñ-� -$/xyÅ0¤¡IaV7]Ðd���
�õ�t�\]yn��}{¶¡f7r0K
-40-
&?(noBCpq
�"#ÂÝ�G01é%�����Ý�G017��yn�Q} ã���2� -�Ð7
:R=�K103=��ÂÝ7�G�k¹Ps�õ@�¬��A�M`� OECD� jA��PP
�nÇ 10-�¬� äl¬ �kc`� ICNÇ 13-¡¢£=�nV§��n¤á¥§��c
`�ÖÇ 8-i¥�G� ¦§â*ÖÇ 18-� äl�G§��âcµ�� OECD-��'¨�
J�7§��K103 =©[ APECÖC�jA�⪱Ö� äl*-^�0â̂ Competition
Policy and Law Group, CPLGb$�j_�0è�Ê� äl*-^�0�k!µ APECC�jA
�Ç 1P*Ç 2P�kK
&O(NrstLMu�vw
�� 103= 10ç 1÷@ 3÷�«GÞ��ÊÖ�G� ¬^ICNb¤á¥§��â��R�
�G�4B 41� 165_�E`���t�n{|n��.$f� -$f�T �Q}���
n®�£n¯¬nF°¬n±�²n��.г� -$/xy�AKdã 9ç@A´÷�º÷�
��+,jA�ݺ�7�Iä-OÖ�G�dxmâ̂ JICAbÃ&_tJ�T�Ê7Ö� -Ý
� älª«µùâ©[ÁçK�u"# 2$Ê�G017� -§���!� г� -$
/xy(d�D��»tJ��ô¶�Gë�7·¸�} �¹��ã'¨� -7�úý_K
&?(noBCpq
&O(NrstLMu�vw
II. Summary Analysis
-43-
Processing of Cases
In 2014, the Fair Trade Commission (hereinafter referred as the “FTC”) opened investigations into
2,375 cases which composed of 374 self-initiated cases and 2,001 reported cases. Among reported cases,
there were 1,538 complaints, 8 applications for concerted actions, 68 merger notifications, and 387
explanation requests. The current year case conclusion ratio in 2006 was 76.0% and then went up yearly to
90.3% in 2014. Among them, the current year case conclusion ratio of the reported cases was 94.4%, and
that of the FTC’s self-initiated cases was 70.1%. The details were as follows:
1. Cases Received
The FTC received 2,001 cases in 2014, 28 cases or 1.4% up from the preceding year. Under processing
in 2014 were 2,225 cases (including 224 cases carried over from the preceding year). Of the total, 2,100
cases were closed, 111 cases or 5.6% up from the preceding year. Pending as of the end of 2014 were 125
cases. (Table 1.1)
Table 1.1 Processing of Cases
Unit: Case, %
Year
Cases under Processing
Cases Closed
Cases Pending
at Year-end Carried Over from
Preceding Year
Received
in Current Year
2012 179 2,114 2,053 240
2013 240 1,973 1,989 224
2014 224 2,001 2,100 125
% Change 14/13 -6.7 1.4 5.6 -44.2
By type of cases received in 2014, complaints decreased 85 cases or 5.2% from the preceding year to
1,538 cases, concerted action applications increased 4 cases from the preceding year to 8 cases, merger
notifications increased 17 cases to 68 cases, and explanation requests increased 92 cases or 31.2% to 387
cases. By composition, complaints ranked the top, accounting for 76.9% of total cases received in 2014,
followed by explanation requests, accounting for 19.3%. The cumulative total number of cases received by
the FTC as of the end of 2014 was 42,494. (Table 1.2 and Chart 1.1)
-44-
Table 1.2 Cases Received by Type
Unit: Case, %
Year Total Complaint
Concerted Action
Application
Merger
Notification
Request for
Explanation
2012 2,114 1,955 10 52 97
2013 1,973 1,623 4 51 295
2014 2,001 1,538 8 68 387
% Change 14/13 1.4 -5.2 100.0 33.3 31.2
Year Composition (%)
2012 100.00 92.5 0.5 2.5 4.6
2013 100.00 82.3 0.2 2.6 15.0
2014 100.00 76.9 0.4 3.4 19.3
PP Change -- -5.4 0.2 0.8 4.3
Note: PP stands for percentage point.
Of 2,225 cases processed in 2014, 2,100 cases were closed in the year. The current year case conclusion
ratio in 2014 was 94.4%, 4.5 percentage point up from the preceding year. Cumulatively, from 1992 to the end
of 2014, 42,369 cases were concluded, and the average case conclusion ratio was 99.7%. (Table 1.3)
�
���
�����
�����
�����
�����
���� ���� ���� ���� ��� ��� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ���� ����
Chart 1.1 Cases Received
Explanation Request
Application & Notification
Complaint
Case
����
-45-
Table 1.3 Conclusion Ratio of Received Cases
Unit: %
Year
Case Conclusion Ratio in Current Year
Total Complaint
Concerted Action
Application
Merger
Notification
Request for
Explanation
2012 89.5 89.1 100.0 87.0 100.0
2013 89.9 88.5 100.0 86.2 99.0
2014 94.4 93.8 87.5 86.8 98.7
PP Change 14/13 4.5 5.3 -12.5 0.6 -0.3
End of Year Cumulative Case Conclusion Ratio
2012 99.4 99.2 100.0 99.9 99.9
2013 99.4 99.3 100.0 99.9 99.8
2014 99.7 99.7 99.5 99.9 99.8
PP Change 14/13 0.3 0.4 -0.5 - -
Note: PP stands for percentage point.
1) Complaints
Complaints received in 2014 totaled 1,538 cases, 85 cases or 5.2% down from 1,623 cases in the
preceding year. Under processing in 2014 were 1,751 complaints (including 213 cases carried over from the
preceding year).
Of the total, 1,642 cases were concluded in 2014. By result of processing, decisions were made for 77
cases or 4.7% of total cases concluded in 2014, the number of cases subject to decision decreased 25 from
the preceding year. No-action decision was set for 199 cases or 12.1% of total cases concluded, and the
number of cases subject to no-action decision decreased 77 cases from the preceding year. The reasons for
most no-action decision included insufficient evidence, self-correction by the complained, and not meeting
the substantive criteria for decision. Two cases or a share of 0.1% were subject to administrative
measurements, 1 case up from the preceding year. These administrative measurements included
recommending competent authorities to take measures in line with the Fair Trade Act, issuing business
warnings, and advising enterprises in question to take corrective measures.
Review and processing were terminated for 1,275 cases or 77.6% of total cases under processing. For
the reasons of terminating processing, 44 cases or a share of 3.5% were involved in criminal charges, 261
cases or a share of 20.5% were involved in civil matters, and 454 cases or a share of 35.6% were outside the
FTC’s jurisdiction or were in other agencies’. The other 516 cases or a share of 40.5% of terminating
processing not meeting the procedural requirements included complaints withdrawn, complainants not
reachable, and incomplete documents received. (Table 1.4)
-46-
Table 1.4 Results of Complaints
Unit: Case, %
Year
Cases Processed Result of Processing
Pending at
Year-end
Carried
Over from
Preceding
Year
Received
in Current
Year
Total Decision
No-action
Decision
Admini-
strative
Action
Review
Termi-
nated
Cases
Consoli-
dated
2012 173 1,955 1,895 86 316 6 1,340 147 233
2013 233 1,623 1,643 102 276 1 1,160 104 213
2014 213 1,538 1,642 77 199 2 1,275 89 109
Year % Change Composition (%) % Change
2012 10.2 43.5 100.00 4.5 16.7 0.3 70.7 7.8 34.7
2013 34.7 -17.1 100.00 6.2 16.8 0.1 70.6 6.3 -8.6
2014 -8.6 -5.2 100.00 4.7 12.1 0.1 77.6 5.4 -48.8
Complainants and complained entities could be categorized as the general public, business firms,
foundations, trade associations, elected representatives, government agencies, and cooperatives. In 2014, of
1,642 cases of complaints concluded, 83.8% filed by the general public ranked the top, and the percentage
share showed decreased 0.8 percentage points. Next was the business firms posting a share of 10.8%, 0.5
percentage points up from the preceding year. Of complained entity, business firms represented the largest
category accounted for 88.9%, and the second largest was general public posting a share of 4.7%. (Tables
1.5)
Table 1.5 Composition of Complaints�By Complainant and Complained Entity
Unit: %
Year Total
General
Public
Business
Firm
Foundation
Trade
Association
Elected
Representative
Government
Agency
Others
Complainant
2012 100.0 82.8 11.0 0.2 0.8 0.1 4.3 0.8
2013 100.0 84.6 10.3 0.2 0.7 0.3 3.2 0.6
2014 100.0 83.8 10.8 0.2 0.5 - 3.5 1.0
PP Change
14/13
-- -0.8 0.5 - -0.2 -0.3 0.3 0.4
Complained Entity
2012 100.0 2.9 92.4 0.2 1.4 - 0.7 2.4
2013 100.0 3.8 92.0 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.9 2.1
2014 100.0 4.7 88.9 0.5 2.2 - 1.0 2.7
PP Change
14/13
-- 0.9 -3.1 0.3 1.2 -0.1 0.1 0.6
Note: “Others” included foreign enterprise, cooperative, and other identity.
-47-
�
For cases concluded in 2014, to divide complained entities in terms of industry, wholesale & retail trade
ranked the top, reporting 41.8% of the total complaints, which showed 1.2 percentage point up from the
preceding year. Manufacturing came next with a share of 13.3%, 2.1 percentage points down from the
preceding year. Information and communication counting the third reported a share of 12.4%, same as the
preceding year. (Table 1.6)
Table 1.6 Industrial Classification of Complained Enterprises
Unit: %
Industry 2012 2013 2014
Change in
PP 14/13
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 --
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing , Animal Husbandry & Mining
and Quarrying
1.1 1.1 1.5 0.4
Manufacturing 16.8 15.4 13.3 -2.1
Electricity & Gas Supply 2.4 0.6 0.4 -0.2
Water Supply & Pollution Remediation Services 0.2 0.2 0.2 -
Construction 1.0 0.8 0.3 -0.5
Wholesale & Retail Trade 34.3 40.6 41.8 1.2
Transportation & Storage 3.0 1.8 2.6 0.8
Accommodation & Food Services 4.7 3.6 3.8 0.2
Information & Communication 13.1 12.4 12.4 -
Finance & Insurance 3.5 3.5 2.8 -0.7
Real Estate 6.9 7.2 7.5 0.3
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1.6 1.5 0.8 -0.7
Supportive Services 1.3 1.7 1.7 -
Public Administration and Defense; Compulsory Social Security 0.2 0.1 0.1 -
Education 2.0 1.8 1.8 -
Health Care & Social Work Services 1.0 1.2 1.6 0.4
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation Services 2.1 0.9 1.9 1.0
Other Services 3.4 3.2 2.9 -0.3
Other Business and Individual 1.6 2.3 2.6 0.3
Note�Industries listed above is according to the Standard Industrial Classification of the ROC edited by the DGBAS.
In 2014, 278 concluded complaints were applicable to the Fair Trade Act. The other closed complaints
were not within the FTC’s jurisdiction, not in conformity with the required procedures, or in duplicate with
other cases. By type of action involved, 66 cases or a share of 23.7% (of total cases) were anti-competitive
practices, 26 (9.4%) illegal concerted actions and impeding fair competition conducts both ranked the top,
and 10 (3.6%) resale price maintenance came next. There were 194 or a share of 69.8% (of total cases)
unfair trade practices, including 114 (41.0%) false, untrue or misleading advertisements, 68 (24.5%)
deceptive or obviously unfair conducts, and 10 (3.6%) counterfeiting symbols of goods or services cases.
Twenty-three cases or a share of 8.3% were illegal multi-level sale practices. (Table 1.7)
-48-
Table 1.7 Concluded Cases of Complaints-By Practices Unit: Case
Year Total
The Fair Trade Act
Anti- competitive
Practice
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
Concerted Actions
(Article 14)
Resale Price Maintenance (Article 18)
Impeding Fair
Competition (Article 19)
Unfair Trade
Practice
2012 408 86 4 6 52 3 21 284
2013 379 80 7 7 28 15 23 253
2014 278 66 2 3 26 10 26 194
% Change 14/13
-26.6 -17.5 -71.4 -57.1 -7.1 -33.3 13.6 -23.3
Year
The Fair Trade Act
The MLMSA
The PIPA
Improper Multi-level
Sales (Articles 23
&23-1~ 23-4)
Others
(2nd Part
of Article41 & Article43)
Counterfeiting Symbols of Goods or Services
(Article 20)
False, Untrue or Mis- leading
Advertisement(Article 21)
Damage to Business
Reputation
(Article 22)
Deceptive or Obviously
Unfair Conducts
(Article 24)
2012 18 184 3 79 34 4 - -
2013 17 175 3 58 40 6 - 2
2014 10 114 7 68 8 - 15 -
% Change 14/13
-41.2 -34.9 133.3 17.2 -90.0 - -- -
Note:1. Illegal actions adding up may exceed the total complaints subject to decision ruling because a complaint may involve more than one illegal action.
2. The Personal Information Protection Act(the PIPA) was enacted on October 1, 2012. The FTC is the competent authority for applying the said Act on the multi-level sales businesses.
3. The Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act (the MLMSA) was promulgated and enacted on January 29, 2014.
In 2014, 77 complaints or 27.7% of total complaints were decided to be against the FTA. A total of 82
decision statements were issued. Following statistics included the multiple charges: on the top there were 55
(67.1%) unfair trade practices (42 false, untrue or misleading advertisements, and 17 deceptive or obviously
unfair conducts), 12 (14.6%) illegal multi-level sale practices, and 15 (18.3%) anti-competitive practices (5
resale price maintenance, 4 illegal concerted actions, 3 illegal merger, and 3 impeding fair competition).
(Table 1.8)
By major division of industrial classification of enterprises subject to decision, wholesale & retail trade
ranked the top, accounting for 52.4%, real estate accounting for 13.4% came next, and the third place was
manufacturing, accounting for 11.0%. The top three accounted for 76.8%. (Chart 1.2)
No
T
AgricFish
Year
DeStat
Com
2012
2013
2014
Year Coun
SymGS
(Ar
2012
2013
2014
ote:Illegal actioinvolve mo
Manufacturing11.0%
Transportation &Storage4.9%
InformationCommunic
3.7%
culture, Forestrhing and Anima
Husbandry2.4%
Table 1.8 C
ecision tements for
mplaints
Ancomp
Prac
96
110
82
nterfeiting mbols of
Goods or ervices rticle 20)
Fal
Adv(A
-
-
-
ons adding up more than one illeg
g
&
n and cation
ry, al
AccomFoo
A
Chart 1.2 C
Complaints Su
nti- etitive ctice
Monopo
(Article
9 -
23 3
15 -
Violatio
lse, Untrue or Mis- leading vertisement
Article 21)
DaB
Re
(A
53
56
42
may exceed the togal action.
Real E13.4
mmodation and od Service
Activities2.4%
Ed
Complaints S
-49-
ubject to Decis
Violat
olies
10)
Mergers
(Article 1
1
5
3
on of the Fair Tra
amage to Business eputation
Article 22)
DecOb
UCo
(Ar
1
-
-
otal complaints
Estate4%
ducation2.4%
Oth7.4
Subject to Dec
sion Ruling-
tion of the Fair T
s
1)
Concerted Actions
(Article 14)
4
3
4
ade Act Impr
MultiSa
(Artic&223
ceptive or bviously Unfair onductsrticle 24)
16 2
20 1
17 3
subject to decisi
hers4%
cision Ruling
By Practices
Trade Act
Resale Price Maintenance (Article 18)
C
-
9
5
roper -level les les 233-1~ -4)
Other
(2nd Pa
of Articl& Article
0 1
1 1
3 1
ion ruling becau
Wh
gs -By Indus
U
Impeding Fair
Competition (Article 19)
UT
Pr
4
3
3
The MLMSA
rs
art le41 e43)
-
-
9
use a complaint m
holesale & RetaTrade52.4%
stry, 2014
Unit: Case
Unfair Trade ractice
68
75
55
The PIPA
-
-
-
may
ail
-50-
2) Explanation Requests
The Fair Trade Act is a set of economic codes regulating both restricting competition and improper
competition behaviors. It covers a scope running wide and deep. However, the actions regulated and the
contents of the law itself leave ample room for explanation. To ensure smooth enforcement of the FTA and
give a clear direction for enterprises to follow, the FTC has, since its establishment, been devoting to publish
explanation statements and to issue guidelines for enterprises. The enterprises can therefore better
understand the FTC’s positions and enforcement direction and adjust their business conducts to be in line
with the spirit of free and fair competition.
In 2014, the FTC received 387 explanation requests, showing an increase of 92 requests or 31.2% from
295 requests in the preceding year. For 337 of 385 requests concluded in 2014, the FTC had come up with
explanation statements, responded with established precedents, or replied according to clear-cut provisions
of laws. Forty-five requests were not answered because they were outside the FTC’s jurisdiction or their
submissions did not follow the proper procedure. (Table 1.9)
Table 1.9 Results of Explanation Requests
Unit: Case
Year
Processing of Case Results of Case Processing Pending
at
Year-end
Carried Over
from Preceding
Year
Received
in Current
Year
Total
Explanation
& Reply
Review
Terminated
Cases
Consolidated
2012 2 97 99 58 41 - -
2013 - 295 292 266 26 - 3
2014 3 387 385 337 45 3 5
% Change 14/13 -- 31.2 31.8 26.7 73.1 -- 66.7
By identification of explanation applicants, the general public was the largest category, which
accounted for 81.3% of total applicants. Following was business firm with a share of 11.7%. (Table 1.10)
Table 1.10 Explanation Requests�By Identification Classification of Applicants
Unit: %
Year Total
General
Public
Business
Firm
Foundation
Trade
Association
Government
Agency
Others
2012 100.0 62.6 18.2 - 7.1 11.1 1.0
2013 100.0 81.8 11.3 - 2.7 3.8 0.3
2014 100.0 81.3 11.7 0.3 1.8 4.4 0.5
3) Mergers
By merger, an enterprise may expand its business scale to enhance the efficiency of operation and gain
advantages from the economy of scale. However, expanding the scale of an enterprise might raise
concentration of a market to the extent that weakens or even impedes free competition. To avoid the
undesired results, the Fair Trade Act required that once a merger reaches certain thresholds, the parties shall
-51-
�
apply for the FTC’s prior approval. In February 2002, to respond to Taiwan’s economic development and
international trend, the “pre-merger approval application” regulations in the Fair Trade Act was amended to
the “pre-merger notification” scheme, merger threshold was restricted and changed into a dual model, in
terms of financial sectors and non-financial sectors.
In 2014, a total of 68 mergers were notified to the FTC, showing an increase of 17 case or 33.3% from
the preceding year. Among 66 merger notifications reviewed in 2014, 33 were not prohibited, and 33 were
terminated due to jurisdiction not exercised, non-notifiable nature or incomplete documentation. (Table 1.11)
Table 1.11 Merger Notifications
Unit: Case
Year
Cases under Processing Results of Case Processing
Carried Over from
Preceding Year
Received in
Current Year
Total Merger not Prohibited
2012 2 52 47 26
2013 7 51 50 30
2014 8 68 66 33
Year
Results of Case Processing
Cases Pending
at Year-end Merger
Prohibited
Termination of Review
Cases
Consolidated
2012 - 20 1 7
2013 - 19 1 8
2014 - 33 - 10
Thirty-three mergers were not prohibited in 2014 under the FTC’s review. By types of merger (which
falls into more than one type will be included in the classification categories accordingly), 25 cases were
holding or acquiring shares or capital contribution of another enterprise (per Subparagraph 2, Paragraph 1,
Article 6 of the Fair Trade Act) ranking the top, followed by 19 directly or indirectly controlling business
operation or personnel change of other enterprise cases (per Subparagraph 5), 7 operated jointly with another
enterprise on a regular basis cases (per Subparagraph 4), 3 merged with another enterprise cases (per
Subparagraph 1), and 3 assigned by or leased from another enterprise the whole or the major part of the
business or properties of such other enterprise cases (per Subparagraph 3). (Table 1.12 and Appendix 3 for
merger notifications not prohibited in 2014)
Table 1.12 Mergers Not Prohibited
Unit: Case
Year
Numbers of Mergers
Notified
By Type of Merger Pattern
(Per Paragraph 1, Article 6, Fair Trade Act)
Subpara. 1 Subpara. 2 Subpara. 3 Subpara. 4 Subpara. 5
2012 26 2 21 6 2 16
2013 30 5 21 2 9 18
2014 33 3 25 3 7 19
% Change 14/13 10.0 -40.0 19.0 50.0 -22.2 5.6
Note: Figures adding up may exceed the total because a merger might be classified into more than one category.
-52-
4) Applications for Concerted Action
To prevent concerted action conducted by enterprises in the same line of business from impeding the
market function and jeopardizing consumers’ interests, the Fair Trade Act specifically prohibits horizontally
concerted actions which damage the market function in such aspects as production, merchandise trade, and
servicing demand and supply. However, 7 types of concerted action listed in per Subparagraph 7, Article 14
of the FTA, considered advantageous to the economy and in the interests of the public, can be exempted
from the prohibition provided that prior-approval is obtained from the FTC.
There were 8 applications for concerted action in 2014, showing an increase of 4 cases from the
preceding year. Among 7 applications concluded in 2014, 3 were for applications for concerted actions
approval (3 approved), and 4 were for amendments to previously approved. The cumulative total number of
applications for concerted action concluded by the FTC from 1992 to the end of 2014 was 186. One hundred
and seventy-four were for approval (131 approved), and 12 were for amendments to previously approved.
(Table 1.13�Table 1.14)
Table 1.13 Applications for Concerted Action
Unit: Case
Year
Cases under Processing Results of Processing
Carried Over from
Preceding Year
Received in
Current Year
Total
Applications for Concerted Action Approval
Sub Total Approved
2012 2 10 12 9 8
2013 - 4 4 - -
2014 - 8 7 3 3
Year
Results of Processing
Cases Pending
at Year-end
Applications for Concerted Action Approval
Amending Concerted
Action Approval Item Rejected Partially Approved
Termination of
Review
2012 - - 1 3 -
2013 - - - 4 -
2014 - - - 4 1
Table 1.14 Types of Applications for Concerted Action
Unit: Case
Year
Concerted Action
Approved
By Type of Concerted Action
(Per Paragraph 1, Article 14, Fair Trade Act)
Subpara. 1 Subpara. 2 Subpara. 3 Subpara. 5
2012 8 4 1 1 4
2013 - - - - -
2014 3 - - - 3
Note: Figures adding up may exceed the total because a concerted action may be classified into more than one category.
Ten concerted actions approved by the FTC remained effective as of the end of 2014. Six of them were
-53-
joint purchases and imports of bulk cargoes such as wheat, barley, soybean, and corn, and most enterprises
participating in these concerted actions were food manufacturing companies. Two applications concerned
with joint credit card business among financial institutions. One was joint shipping of materials and
equipments purchased by government agencies and public owned enterprises and approved in the reason of
lowering import costs, reducing required capital funds and procurement risks, and increasing bargaining
power and therefore was in the interests of the economy (per Subparagraph 5, paragraph 1, Article 14 of the
FTA). And 1 was regarding joint scheduling, joint ticketing and ticket sharing on Tonggang-Little Liuqiu
route between cruise liner companies, proved per Subparagraph 1, Paragraph 1, Article 14 of the FTA.
(Table 1.15)
Table 1.15 Concerted Actions Remaining Valid
Until the End of 2014
Concerted Action
Valid Period of
Concerted Action
No. of
Enterprises
Applicable FTA
Article
1. Joint shipping of barley under extended joint
procurement program
01/01/2012~
12/31/2014
6 Subpara. 5,
Para. 1, Article 14 &
Para. 2, Article 15
2. Joint shipping of corn under extended joint
procurement program (Feed League)
02/29/2012~
02/28/2015
44 Subpara. 5,
Para. 1, Article 14 &
Para. 2, Article 15
3. Joint shipping of corn under extended joint
procurement program(Great Wall League)
06/01/2012~
05/31/2015
5 Subpara. 5,
Para. 1, Article 14 &
Para. 2, Article 15
4. Joint shipping of soybean under extended joint
procurement program (Middle League)
09/01/2012~
08/31/2015
6 Subpara. 5,
Para. 1, Article 14 &
Para. 2, Article 15
5. Joint shipping of wheat under extended joint
procurement program
10/01/2012~
09/30/2015
42 Subpara. 5,
Para. 1, Article 14 &
Para. 2, Article 15
6. Joint shipping of soybean under extended joint
procurement program
03/13/2014~
03/12/2017
6 Subpara. 5,
Para. 1, Article 14&
Para. 2, Article 15
7. Joint credit card businesses among financial
institutions under extended joint program
01/01/2013~
12/31/2015
29 Subpara. 1,
Para. 1, Article 14&
Para. 2, Article 15
8. Joint credit card businesses among state-owned
financial institutions
03/24/2012~
03/01/2015
8 Subpara. 1 & 2,
Para. 1, Article 14&
Para. 2, Article 15
9. Joint shipping of materials and equipment for
government agencies and public owned enterprises
under extended joint carriage program
09/29/2014~
09/28/2017
13 Subpara. 5,
Para. 1, Article 14&
Para. 2, Article 15
10. Joint scheduling, joint ticketing and ticket sharing on
Tonggang- Little Liuqiu route
07/02/2012~
07/01/2015
5 Subpara. 1,
Para. 1, Article 14&
Para. 2, Article 15
-54-
2. FTC Self-initiated Investigations
Since its establishment, the Fair Trade Commission has dedicated itself to establish a fair and
reasonable market order. It has not only carefully handled all kinds of complaints but actively taken initiative
to conduct special investigations on matters which are governed by the Fair Trade Act and might damage the
public interests. In 2014, the FTC initiated 374 investigation cases. The cumulative number of investigation
activities initiated by the FTC as of the end of 2014 totaled 2,972 cases. Of the total, 2,838 cases were
concluded and the remaining 134 cases were under processing.
For 314 self-initiated cases concluded in 2014, the FTC had devoted 2,245 persons in manpower, and
investigated 1,036 enterprises. By processing result, decision ruling was handed down for 67 cases due to
violation against the FTA. A total of 68 decision statements were issued for 100 enterprises. Two hundred
and twenty-seven cases were found not violating the FTA, or not subject to the FTC’s jurisdiction, or simply
required attention to their development, and 20 cases referred by other government agencies or reported by
the general public were in duplicate with other cases. (Table 1.16)
Table 1.16 FTC Self-initiated Investigation
Unit: Case
Year
Cases Subject to Decision
No-action
Decision
Administrative
Action
Investigation
Terminated
OthersInitiated
Cases
Decision
Statements
Firms Subject
to Decision
2012 102 107 190 112 7 118 39
2013 102 104 153 110 1 71 85
2014 67 68 100 99 3 125 20
Note�1. The number of decision statements and firms subject to decision excluded cases also been complained.
2. “Others” means same cases referred by different agencies or cases consolidated due to duplicated complaints.
By type of violation of decision statements issued by the FTC for its self-initiated investigation cases in
2014, 32 false, untrue or misleading advertisements ranked the top. Illegal multi-level sales were 16 cases
(including violation of the FTA and the MLMSA) came next, and followed by 9 deceptive or obviously
unfair conducts. (Table 1.17)
Table 1.17 Decision for FTC Self-initiated Investigations�By Pattern of Action against FTA
Unit: Case
Year
Decision
Statements
for FTC
Self-initiated
Investigation
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
Unfair
Trade
Practice
Anticom-
petitive
Practice
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
Concerted
Actions
(Article 14)
Resale Price
Maintenance
(Article 18)
Impeding Fair
Competition
(Article 19)
2012 107 19 - - 14 4 2 61
2013 104 6 - 1 4 1 - 57
2014 68 12 2 2 2 3 3 40
Year
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
Vio-
lation of
the
MLMSA
Vio-
lation
of the
PIPA
Improper
Multi-level
Sales
(Articles23
&23-1�23-4)
Others
(2nd Part
of Article
41 &
Article 43)
Counterfeiting
Symbols of Goods
or Services
(Article 20)
False, Untrue
or Misleading
Advertisement
(Article 21)
Damage to
Business
Reputation
(Article 22)
Deceptive or
Obviously
Unfair Conducts
(Article 24)
2012 - 57 - 4 26 1 - -
2013 - 52 1 5 40 2 - -
2014 - 32 - 9 2 - 14 -
Note�The discrepancy between the cases of decision ruling and the number of illegal actions was caused by a fact that a case might
involve more than one illegal action.
�
-55-
3. Decision Rulings for Fair Trade Act Enforcement
In 2014, the FTC issued 150 decision statements, for decision rulings of complaints and self-initiated investigation, 64 cases or 29.9% down from the preceding year. By type of illegal actions (a case may involve more than one illegal actions and the following analysis is based on duplicate calculation), 18.0% of total illegal actions were anti-competitive practice, 63.3% unfair trade practice, and 18.7% were illegal multi-level sale practices. (Table 1.18)
Table 1.18 Decision Ruling by FTC-By Illegal Action Unit: Case
Year Decision
Statements
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
Unfair Trade
Practice
Anticom- petitive Practice
Monopolies (Article 10)
Mergers (Article 11)
Concerted Actions
(Article 14)
Resale PriceMaintenance(Article 18)
Impeding Fair Competition
(Article 19) 2012 203 28 - 1 18 4 6 129
2013 214 29 3 6 7 10 3 132
2014 150 27 2 5 6 8 6 95
Year
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
Violation of the
MLMSA
Violation of thePIPA
Improper Multi-level
Sales (Articles23&23-1~23-4)
Others (2nd Part of Article 41 & Article
43)
Counterfeiting Symbols of
Goods or Services (Article 20)
False, Untrue or Misleading Advertisement (Article 21)
Damage to Business
Reputation (Article 22)
Deceptive or Obviously
Unfair Conducts(Article 24)
2012 - 110 1 20 46 2 - -
2013 - 108 1 25 51 3 - -
2014 - 74 - 26 5 1 23 -
Note: The number of illegal actions may exceed the cases of decision ruling because a case may involve more than one illegal action.
Among decision rulings in 2014, by division of industry, wholesale and retail trade ranked the top, accounting for 46.7% of total cases of decision ruling (nonstore retail trade accounting for 28.0%) and 11.7 percentage point down from the preceding year. The next was real estate reported a share of 23.3%, 12.6 percentage point up from the preceding year. (Table 1.19)
Total of 207 firms were subject to the decision ruling for breaching the Fair Trade Act in 2014, showing a decrease of 114 firms or 35.5% down from the preceding year. A firm may commit more than one illegal action. Following analysis is based on the duplicate calculation. By type of illegal actions, under the category of anti-competitive practice, 38 firms committed concerted action ranked the top. Under the category of unfair trade practice, 90 firms committed false, untrue or misleading advertisement, 27 firms committed deceptive or obviously unfair conducts. Twenty-eight firms committed illegal multi-level sales practices (including violation of the FTA and the MLMSA). (Table 1.20)
-56-
Table 1.19 Composition of Decision Ruling Cases�By Industry
Unit: %
Year Total
Agriculture,
Forestry, Fishing,
Animal
Husbandry, Mining
& Quarrying
Manufacturing
Electricity &
Gas Supply
Water Supply &
Remediation
Services
Construction
Wholesale &
Retail Trade
2012 100.0 1.5 15.3 1.5 1.5 - 53.2
2013 100.0 - 11.7 0.9 - 0.9 58.4
2014 100.0 2.0 10.0 0.7 - 0.7 46.7
Year Transportation &
Storage
Accommoda-
tion &Food
Services
Information &
Communica-
tion
Finance &
Insurance
Real Estate
Professional,
Scientific &
Technical
Services
Supportive
Services
2012 1.5 3.0 4.4 1.0 7.4 5.4 3.0
2013 1.9 2.8 7.5 0.5 10.7 1.4 -
2014 3.3 2.7 3.3 - 23.3 0.7 -
Year
Public
Administration ,
Defense;
Compulsory
Social Security
Education
Health Care &
Social Work
Services
Arts,
Entertainment &
Recreation
Services
Other
Services
Other
Business &
Individual
2012 - - - 0.5 1.0 -
2013 - - - 0.5 2.8 -
2014 - 1.3 - 1.3 4.0 -
Table 1.20 Firms Subject to Decision Ruling by FTC�By Illegal Action
Unit: Firm
Year
Decision
Statements
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
Unfair
Trade
Practice
Anticom-
petitive
Practice
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
Concerted
Actions
(Article 14)
Resale Price
Maintenance
(Article 18)
Impeding Fair
Competition
(Article 19)
2012 355 142 - 1 132 4 6 167
2013 321 81 3 8 57 10 3 187
2014 207 68 2 12 38 8 8 111
Year
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
Violation
of the
MLMSA
Violation
of the
PIPA
Improper
Multi-level
Sales
(Articles23
&23-1�23-4)
Others
(2nd Part
of Article
41 &
Article 43)
Counterfeiting
Symbols of
Goods or Services
(Article 20)
False, Untrue
or Misleading
Advertisement
(Article 21)
Damage to
Business
Reputation
(Article 22)
Deceptive or
Obviously
Unfair Conducts
(Article 24)
2012 - 141 1 27 46 2 - -
2013 - 142 1 46 51 3 - -
2014 - 90 - 27 5 1 23 -
Note: The number of illegal actions may exceed the cases of decision ruling because a case may involve more than one illegal action.
An analysis of penalties (duplicate calculation adopted for illegal action liable to more than one penalty)
-57-
�
�
showed that in 2014, 60 cases were ordered to stop illegal actions or take corrective measure. Among them,
4 required by Article 13, 46 required by Article 41, 2 required by Article 42 of the FTA, and 8 required by
Article 32 to Article 34 of the MLMSA. There were 147 cases imposed of administrative fines, including 5
cases under Article 40, 113 cases under the Paragraph 1, Article 41, 2 cases under the Paragraph 2, Article 41,
1 case under the Paragraph 2, Article 42 of the FTA, 5 cases under SRGMS according to Paragraph 3, the
Article 42, and 24 cases under Article 32 to Article 35 of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act. The
fines, after deduction of fines repealed, totaled NT$ 6,182.09 million. The fines for anti-competitive
practices cases totaled NT$ 6,138.46 million (the fine for 9 independent power producers that jointly refused
to re-negotiate the terms of the purchase agreement with the Taiwan Power Company were readjusted to
NT$ 6,007 million), and those for unfair trade practices cases totaled NT$ 30.98 million (Table 1.21)
Table 1.21 Penalty under Decision Ruling by FTC
Unit: Case
Year
Decision
Statements
Ordered to Stop or Correct Action Fined
Fair Trade Act Article
32,33,34
of the
MLMSA
Article 47,
48 of the
PIPA
Fair Trade Act
Article 13 Article 41 Article 42 Article 40
Para. 1,
Article 41
2012 203 1 106 19 - - 1 154
2013 214 6 69 21 - - 5 148
2014 150 4 46 2 8 - 5 113
Year
Fined Forbid Collecting &
Processing, Demand
Deletion, Confiscate or
Destroy, Publicize the
Violation Case
(Article 25 of PIPA)
Fine on
Representa-
tive
(Article 50
of the
PIPA)
Fair Trade Act Article
32, 33,
34, 35
of the
MLMSA
Article
47, 48, 49
of the
PIPA
Para. 2,
Article
41
Article 42
Article
43 Para. 2 Para. 3
2012 - 2 38 1 - - - -
2013 2 4 51 1 - - - -
2014 1 - 5 - 24 - - -
Note: Cases of penalties may not add up to the number of decision rulings because one decision may involve more than one penalty.
4. Appeals
The FTC has authority to impose administrative penalty on enterprises violating the Fair Trade Act. To
protect the rights of the penalized enterprises, in accordance with the Appeal Act effective on July 2000,
enterprises concerned can raise appeal to the Executive Yuan. In 2014, the Executive Yuan received 85
appeal cases concerning the FTA, and reviewed 110 appeal cases, including 25 appeal cases carried over
from 2013.
By results, in 2014, there were 90 appeal cases concluded, 70 of them were rejected, 12 original
decisions were repealed, and 8 appeals were not accepted. The cumulative number of appeal cases reached
2,094 and the number of appeal cases concluded was 2,074 from July 2000 to the end of 2014. (Table 1.22)
-58-
Table 1.22 Results of Appeal
Unit: Case
Year
Case Received Cases Concluded
Carried Over from
Preceding Year
Received in
Current Year
Total Rejected
Original
Decision
Repealed
2012 29 155 147 119 17
2013 37 100 112 81 8
2014 25 85 90 70 12
Cases Concluded
Case
Pending Year
Not
Accepted
Withdrawn
Partially
Rejected,
Partially Not
Accepted
Partially Rejected,
Original Decision
Partially Repealed
Original
Decision
Partially
Repealed
2012 11 - - - - 37
2013 11 1 2 9 - 25
2014 8 - - - - 20
The administrative litigation procedure was restructured as the three-level and two-instance system on
6th
September, 2012. The first instance for the Fair Trade Act case could be then raised to the Administrative
Litigation Division of the District Court, in addition to the High Administrative Court. From September
2012 to the end of 2014, 8 Fair Trade Act and other laws cases administered by the FTC, the District Court
were closed. Five of them were rejected due to unreason, 1 was rejected due to not in conformity with the
law, 1 was withdrawn, and 1 was referred to the High Administrative Court.
Since the enactment of the Appeal Act and the Administrative Litigation Act in July 2000, as to the end
of 2014, a cumulative 849 cases of administrative litigation raised to the High Administrative Court were
closed. Eighty cases were rejected due to not in conformity with the law, and 592 cases were rejected due to
unreason. For 98 cases, original decisions and decisions of appeal were both repealed. Thirty cases were
withdrawn. For 32 cases, decision of appeal and original decision were partially repealed. For 3 cases,
original decisions were partially repealed and other charges were rejected. For 2 cases, decisions of appeal,
decisions of re-appeal, and original decisions were all repealed. For 1 case, decision of appeal, decision of
re-appeal, and original decision were all partially repealed. For 2 cases, decisions of appeal were repealed
and other charges were rejected. And 9 cases were other results.
From July 2000 to the end of 2014, the Supreme Administrative Court had finalized 472 Fair Trade
Act and other laws cases administered by the FTC. One hundred and twenty-five cases were rejected due to
not in conformity with the law, and 261 cases were rejected due to unreason. For 72 cases, the original
judgments were abolished and the cases were returned to the High Administrative Court for reviewing. For 6
cases, the original judgments were abolished and the Supreme Administrative Court had made its own
judgments. Two cases were withdrawn. For 1 case, original decision, decision of appeal and decision of
re-appeal were all repealed. For 1 case, partial original judgment was abolished and returned to the High
Administrative Court for reviewing and partial re-appeal was rejected. And 4 cases were other results.
-59-
5. Decisions Repealed
In 2014, 2 decision statements made by the FTC were repealed by appeals or administrative litigation.
The cumulative number of decision statements made by the FTC as of the end of 2014 totaled 4,178. Of the
total, 168 decisions were repealed or partially repealed, 4,036 decisions were sustained or partially sustained.
The original decision statement maintenance ratio was 96.6%. (Table 1.23)
Table 1.23 Decisions Repealed – By Type of Illegal Actions
Unit: Case
The Year
Decisions
Made
Decisions
Statements
Repealed
Monopolies
Concerted
Actions
Impeding Fair
Competition
False, Untrue or
Misleading
Advertisement
Deceptive or
Obviously Unfair
Conducts
(Article 10) (Article 14) (Article 19) (Article 21) (Article 24)
2012 13 - 6 - 3 3
2013 4 1 2 - - -
2014 2 1 - 1 - -
Notes: 1. Number of decisions repealed includes decisions repealed and partially repealed.
2. Number of decision statements repealed is not the same with illegal actions due to some cases involved with more than
one action or decisions repealed for reason other than the actions involved. (e.g. penalties repealed)
-60-
Regulation of Multi-level Sales Enterprises
1. Recordation
Enterprise engaged in multi-level marketing was previously required by the Supervisory Regulations
Governing Multi-level Sales and is required by the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act since 29 January,
2014 to register with the FTC for recordation prior to commencing the business. In 2014, 126 enterprises
completed the required recordation, and 141 enterprises withdrew their recordation. The cumulative number
of enterprises registered with the FTC was 414 by the end of 2014. (Table 2.1)
Table 2.1 Recordation of Multi-level Sales Enterprises
Unit: Enterprise
Year
Enterprises Recordation
at End of Preceding
Year
Enterprises Recordation
in Current Year
Enterprises
Withdrawing
Recordation
Enterprises Recordation
at End of Current Year
2012 414 143 143 414
2013 414 145 130 429
2014 429 126 141 414
By location, the number of multi-level marketing enterprises in Taipei City ranked the top, reported 182
enterprises or 44.0% of total recorded enterprises. Coming next was Taichung City reported 81 enterprises or
a share of 19.6%, and then Kaohsiung City reported 43 enterprises or a share of 10.4%. Recorded enterprises
in the three cities accounted for 74.0% of total. The distribution of recorded enterprises indicated multi-level
marketing enterprises tend to develop in cities with high density of population. (Table 2.2)
Table 2.2 Location of Multi-level Sales Enterprises
Unit: Enterprise
Area
Number of
Enterprises Area
Number of
Enterprises Area
Number of
Enterprises
2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013
Total 414 429
New Taipei City 39 35 Hsinchu County 3 2 Taitung County - -
Taipei City 182 183 Miaoli County 4 2 Hualien County - -
Taoyuan City 35 36
Changhua
County
2 3 Penghu County - -
Taichung City 81 93 Nantou County 1 1 Keelung City 1 2
Tainan City 15 17 Yunlin County 1 1 Hsinchu City 1 1
Kaohsiung City 43 47 Chiayi County - - Chiayi City - -
Yilan County 3 4 Pingtung County 3 2 Kimmen & Matsu - -
Note: The Taoyuan County was upgraded as a special municipality Taoyuan City on 25 December, 2014.
�
-61-
2. Review of Operation
The FTC monitors the multi-level marketing operation in “full-scale review” and “prevention in
advance” ways to effectively prevent them turning into pyramid selling schemes. If an enterprise’s recorded
materials are found against regulations, the enterprise in question is required to correct them prior to a set
date. In addition, the FTC conducts on-site inspection of multi-level marketing enterprises on an irregular
basis to see if they keep and display the written statements as required by law and if business actions consist
with what they have reported. The purpose is to uncover problems and prevent them from occurring
beforehand.
The FTC conducts on-site inspection of multi-level marketing enterprise on its own schedule, as well as
when there is a complaint received or a need to review further. In 2014, the FTC had reviewed 48
multi-level marketing enterprises, 12 of them were also reviewed the implementation of their security
maintenance program for personal information protection. As for the results, 15 firms or 31.3% complied
with the regulations, 17 firms or 35.4% were advised for minor issues, and 15 firms or 31.3% were
investigated due to failing to comply with regulations. By types of the enterprises failing to comply with
regulations included: 11 firms displaced written contract inconsistent with recordation ranked the top, 4
firms failed to display required documents at place of business came next. (Tables 2.3 and 2.4)
Table 2.3 Inspection of Multi-level Sales Enterprises
Unit: Enterprise
Year
Time of
Inspection
Results of Inspection
Complying
with
Regulations
Not Complying
with
Regulations
Advising for
Minor Issues
Not in
Operation
Operation
Suspended
Location
Unknown
2012 57 16 22 8 2 2 7
2013 60 16 27 15 - 1 1
2014 48 15 15 17 - 1 -
Table 2.4 Inspection of Multi-level Sales Enterprises�By Cause of Violation
Unit: Enterprise
Year
Enterprises against
Regulations
Causes for Violation
Failure to Disclose
Adequate Information to
Participants
Written Contract
Inconsistent with
Recordation
Procedure for
Returning Products
against Regulations
2012 22 3 3 3
2013 27 1 4 2
2014 15 - 11 1
Year
Causes for Violation
Failure to Display
Relevant Documents
at Place of Business
Operation without
Reporting
in Advance
Changes of Recordation
without Reporting in
Advance
Others
2012 4 1 19 2
2013 4 1 19 1
2014 4 - - 1
Note: Figures added up may exceed the total because an enterprise may commit more than one irregularity.
-62-
3. Decision Ruling on Multi-level Sales Enterprises
In 2014, the FTC set decision rulings for 28 multi-level marketing practices, which showed a decrease
of 23 from the preceding year. In 2014, 27 enterprises were subjected to decision rulings, and fines totaled
NT$ 4.45 million. Five enterprises penalized violated the Supervisory Regulations Governing Multi-level
Sales under the Fair Trade Act, and 23 breached the provisions of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act.
Divided by provisions of violations, 14 cases failed to report to the FTC regarding its changes of previous
recordation violated Article 7 of the MLMSA ranking the top, 4 cases violated Article 6 came next. (Tables
2.5 and 2.6)
Table 2.5 Illegal Multi-level Sales Actions
Unit: Case
Year
No. of
Decision
Statements
Article
23
Article
23-1
Article
23-2
Article
23-3
Article
23-4 (Supervisory
Regulations
Governing
Multi-level Sales)
2012 46 - - 2 - 45
2013 51 - 2 3 1 51
2014 5 - - - - 5
Note: Some cases violate both of the Fair Trade Act and the Supervisory Regulations Governing Multi-level Sales.
Table 2.6 Decision Ruling for Multi-level Sales Enterprises�By Illegal Articles
(�) Supervisory Regulations Governing Multi-level Sales Unit: Case
Year
No of
Decision
Statements
Article 5 Article 7 Article 11 Article 12 Article 13 Article 14 Article 15
2012 45 13 25 2 15 2 - 1
2013 51 8 38 - 4 1 1 -
2014 5 2 3 - - - - -
Year Article 16 Article 17 Article 18 Article 19 Article 20 Article 22 Article 23
2012 4 - 2 - 2 3 -
2013 8 - 2 1 - 3 -
2014 - - - - - - -
(�) Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act
Year
No of
Decision
Statements
Article 6 Article 7 Article 9 Article 10 Article 11 Article 12 Article 13
2014 23 4 14 - 1 - 1 -
Year Article 14 Article 15 Article 16 Article 17 Article 18 Article 19 Article 20
2014 2 - 3 - - - 1
Year Article 21 Article 22 Article 23 Article 24 Article 25 Article 26 Article 28 Article 38
2014 2 - - 2 - - - -
Note: 1.Figures may add up to exceed the total because violation may consist of more than one article of the FTA.
2.The Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act was promulgated and enacted on January 29, 2014.
-63-
�
�
�
Commissioners Meeting
1. Deliberation
The decision-making body of the FTC is the Commissioners Meeting which functions through
gathering of commissioners to deliberate and decide the FTC’s major administrative programs. The 6 main
responsibilities of the FTC’s Commission Meeting in accordance with the provision of the Article 9 of the
Organic Statute of the Fair Trade Commission are: (1) deliberating fair trade and multi-level sales
management policies; (2) deliberating laws and regulations related to fair trade and multi-level sales
management; (3) deliberating and evaluating administration plans relate to fair trade and multi-level sales
management; (4) deliberating and evaluating public notices, approvals, and disposition related to the
enforcement of the Fair Trade Act and the Multi-level Sales Management Act; (5) deliberating proposals by
commissioners; (6) deliberating other matters as provided by the Acts.
The FTC held 52 Commissioners Meetings to review 560 submissions in 2014. The submissions
included 391 reports (69.8%) and 169 discussions (30.2%). On the average, each time the Commissioners
Meeting heard 10.8 submissions, including 3.3 discussions and 7.5 reports. (Table 3.1)
Table 3.1 Submissions to the Commissioners Meeting
Unit: Case, %
Year
Total Report Discussion
Case % of Total Case % of Total Case % of Total
2012 677 100.0 480 70.9 197 29.1
2013 571 100.0 425 74.4 146 25.6
2014 560 100.0 391 69.8 169 30.2
The 169 discussions reviewed in 2014 included 85 complaints and self-initiated investigation cases, 30
draft amendments of laws and regulations, 30 applications & notifications, 1 request for explanation, and 23
other issues. Results of the deliberation showed that of total review cases, 106 cases or 62.7% were passed
as proposed, 33 cases or 19.5% were passed with amendments, 4 cases or 2.4% pending for further
discussion, and 26 cases or 15.4% with other results. (Table 3.2 and Chart 3.1)
-64-
Table 3.2 Discussions by Type
Unit: Case;�
Year Total
Laws &
Regulations
Project
Proposals
Complaints &
Self-initiated
Investigations
Applications &
Notifications
Requests
for
Explanation
Research
Projects
Others
2012 197 47 - 109 23 - - 18
2013 146 21 - 89 15 - 4 17
2014 169 30 - 85 30 1 - 23
Year Ratio
2012 100.0 23.9 - 55.3 11.7 - - 9.1
2013 100.0 14.4 - 61.0 10.3 - 2.7 11.6
2014 100.0 17.8 - 50.3 17.8 0.6 - 13.6
2. Meeting Time
On the average, each Commissioners Meeting in 2014 spent 2 hours and 6 minutes, showing a decrease
of 3 minutes from 2013. By time used per meeting, less than 2 hours ranked the top, accounted for 46.2%,
and the next was 2-3 hours, accounted for 44.2%. (Table 3.3)
Table 3.3 Time Spent by FTC Commissioners Meeting
Time
2014 2013
No. of
Meeting
% of
Total
No. of
Meeting
% of
Total
Total 52 100.0 53 100.0
Less than 2 hours 24 46.2 18 34.0
2 – 3 hours 23 44.2 24 45.3
3 – 4 hours 5 9.6 11 20.8
4 – 5 hours - - - -
5 – 6 hours - - - -
more than 6 hours - - - -
Chart 3.1 Deliberation on Discussions
Pass as Proposed
62.7%
Pass with
Amendment
19.5%
Pending for Further
Discussion 2.4%
Others 15.4%
In 2014, the Commission Meeting of the FTC deliberated 169 Discussions.
-65-
Consulting Services and Policy Implementation
1. Consulting Services
1) Service Center
The FTC set up service centers in its main office and south Taiwan branch to provide enterprises and
the general public with consulting services and to answer questions concerning the Fair Trade Act and
administrative projects. Services provided by the centers, according to the operation guidelines, are
classified into four categories: (1) explanation of the laws and regulations administered by the FTC; (2)
provision of educational materials; (3) explanation of applied item; and (4) acceptance of complaints. The
aforementioned services totaled 8,912 cases in 2014, 8.3% down from the preceding year. Most services
provided were explanation of laws and regulations administered by the FTC. (Table 4.1)
Table 4.1 Services Provided by FTC Service Center
Unit: Case
Year Total
Explanation of
the Laws and
Regulations
Administered by
the FTC
Provision of
Educational
Materials
Explanation of
Applied Items
Acceptance of
Complaints
2012 10,619 8,821 328 1,042 428
2013 9,717 8,013 308 1,084 312
2014 8,912 7,490 206 857 359
�
2) Supporting Activities by Local Governments
The FTC has authority and responsibility to instruct and supervise local governments in implementing
Fair Trade Act related matters, as well as to entrust the local governments to provide supportive services.
Supporting activities provided by local governments in 2014 were 905 cases, including 261 cases in
providing forms and information, 127 cases in referring cases, 18 cases in holding educational programs, 43
cases in collecting evidences, 18 cases in checking matters, 56 cases in collecting industrial data, 24 cases in
ad hoc statistical survey, and 358 cases in other matters. (Table 4.2)
-66-
Table 4.2 Supporting Activities of Local Governments
2014 Unit: Case
Agencies Total
Providing
Forms & Data
Delivering
Case Document
Conducting
Educational
Program
Collecting
Evidence
Total 905 261 127 18 43
New Taipei City Gov’t 103 8 23 1 18
Taipei City Gov’t 80 25 24 1 5
Taichung City Gov’t 26 - 8 1 2
Tainan City Gov’t 49 14 10 1 1
Kaohsiung City Gov’t 17 - 6 1 -
15 County/City Gov’ts 602 205 52 12 17
Kingmen County Gov’t 26 9 3 1 -
Lien-chiang County Gov’t 2 - 1 - -
Agencies
Checking
Matters
Collecting
Industrial Data
Ad hoc survey Others
Total 18 56 24 358
New Taipei City Gov’t 5 12 1 35
Taipei City Gov’t 1 1 5 18
Taichung City Gov’t 1 5 2 7
Tainan City Gov’t - 5 - 18
Kaohsiung City Gov’t - 1 1 8
15 County/City Gov’ts 11 32 15 258
Kingmen County Gov’t - - - 13
Lien-chiang County Gov’t - - - 1
3) Competition Policy Information and Research Center
The FTC established the Competition Policy Information and Research Center (the CPIRC) in January
1997. The CPIRC is designed to provide both domestic and foreign users with consultation on competition
policy and laws as well as research and training services. Achievements of the CPIRC in 2014 were as
follows:
(1) Collection and maintenance of competition policy information, provision of professional consultant
services: collecting competition policy data, including more than 22,000 volumes of books, more than
45 periodicals, the monthly updating competition law newspaper clipping system, and the APEC
Competition Policy and Law Database which consists of data of the 21 APEC members.
(2) Provision of competition policy training services to promote competition policy concepts: (1) inviting
experts and scholars majoring in competition law to give lectures, 12 lectures were held in 2014 with
nearly than 450 attendees; (2) holding 7 sessions of the Training Program on the Fair Trade Act and the
-67-
Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act for university and college students. The attendees were around
420.
(3) Publication of competition policy and law related materials to facilitate academic research and
international information sharing: In 2014, the “Competition Policy Newsletter” bi-monthly were
publicized in both Chinese and English versions and provided to libraries of universities, colleges, and
research institutions both domestic and overseas. The E-News of the FTC was first published on 16,
April, 2014, and is to be released every first and third Wednesday of each month. The contents included
keynote speeches, international activity, major cases, latest news, and the Fair Trade Quarterly, Number
of subscription nearly reached 4,000.
2. Public Education and Issuing Guidelines
1) Public Education and Training
To help the general public to understand the Fair Trade Act, the FTC actively engaged in publicity
works and designed tailor-made contents for the business in general, sector-specific practitioners, young
students, female and senior citizens, and junior high school teachers. In 2014, 109 seminars were held,
including 70 seminars by the FTC, 18 seminars by the contracted local governments, and 21 seminars
supported by the FTC lecturers. (Table 4.3)
Table 4.3 Fair Trade Act Public Education Programs and Seminars
Unit: Session
Year Total
Conducted
by FTC
Conducted by
Contracted Local
Governments
Conducted by
Contracted
Industrial
Associations
Lectures on Fair
Trade Act
2012 109 65 18 - 26
2013 111 76 19 - 16
2014 109 70 18 - 21
2) Issuing Guidelines
To meet the needs of economic development and social change and to enhance the transparency and
effectiveness of the enforcement work, the FTC has been issuing and revising guidelines on cases in line
with its own enforcement experiences, international trend of competition laws development, and legislation
and enforcement of various countries. In 2014, the FTC issued, revised and abolished guidelines as follows:
(1) Revised the “Fee-charging Standards for Providing Government Information by the Fair Trade
Commission”;
(2) Revised the “Regulations for the Examination of Financial Holding Company Merger Cases”;
(3) Issued the “Enforcement Rules of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act”;
(4) Revised the “Enforcement Rules of the Fair Trade Act”;
(5) Abolished the “Supervisory Regulations Governing Multi-Level Sales”;
-68-
(6) Revised the “Regulations Governing the Security Maintenance Program for Personal Information Files
and the Methods Handling Personal Information After Termination of Business by Multi-level
Marketing Enterprises”;
(7) Issued the “Criterion for Multi-level Marketing Enterprises Filing Reports for Record or Amendment”;
(8) Issued the “Thresholds for Multi-level Marketing Enterprises’ Financial Statements Required to be
Audited by Certified Public Accountants”;
(9) Issued the “Regulations for the Establishment and Administration of the Multi-level Marketing
Enterprises and Participants Protection Institute”;
(10) Revised the “Fair Trade Commission Guidelines on Cases Concerning Multi-level Marketing”;
(11) Abolished the “Notices for Multi-level Marketing Enterprises Filing Reports for Record or
Amendment”;
(12) Revised the “Fair Trade Commission Guidelines on Handling Merger Notification Cases”;
(13) Revised the “Fair Trade Commission Notices on Holding Public Hearings”;
(14) Revised the “Fair Trade Commission Guidelines on Procedures of Handling Merger Notification
Cases”;
(15) Revised the “Fair Trade Commission Guidelines on Cases Concerning Promotions by Means of Gifts
and Prizes”;
(16) Revised the “Fair Trade Commission Notices on Seeking Outside Opinions on Merger Notification
Cases”;
(17) Revised the “Fair Trade Commission Guidelines on Cases Concerning Illegal In-house Sub-contract”;
(18) Revised the “Fair Trade Commission Guidelines on Sales of Preconstruction Real Estate” (previously
known as the “Fair Trade Commission Policy Statements on Sales of Preconstruction Real Estate”) ;
3. Revisions of the Fair Trade Act
The Fair Trade Act had been enforcing for more than 20 years since its promulgation on February 4,
1991 and entering into force on February 4, 1992. To respond to the dramatic changes of socio-economic
environment in recent years, the FTC thoroughly reviewed the Fair Trade Act, drafted the amendments of it,
consulted with relevant government agencies, the business communities, and the academic, and then on June
19, 2012, submitted the draft amendments to the Executive Yuan. The Executive Yuan then reviewed and
passed the draft amendments in the cabinet meeting on December 6, 2012, and presented the draft
amendments to the Legislative Yuan on December 13, 2012, for deliberation. The Economic Affair
Committee of the Legislative Yuan held two sessions to review the draft amendments along with other
proposals raised by some legislators on 12 and 26, May, 2014. The amendments were finally passed in the
Legislative Yuan’s 19th Meeting of the 6nd Session of the 8th
Members’, and promulgated and enacted by the
Presidential Decree No. 10400014311 on 4, February, 2015.
-69-
The amendments were to respond to the structural reformation of the Executive Yuan, to re-structure
and refine the Fair Trade Act, to strengthen the FTC’s enforcement power, and to enhance the effectiveness
of penalty. The major aspects included:
(1) Revised the definition of enterprise (amendment Article 2);
(2) Revised the name of the FTC, and abolished the provisions regarding local government (amendment
Article 6, etc.);
(3) Revised the criteria for defining monopolistic enterprise (amendment Article 8);
(4) Revised the regulations regarding mergers (amendment Article 10 to Article 12);
(5) Revised the regulations regarding concerted actions (amendment Article 14 to Article 18);
(6) Prohibited resale price maintenance, added qualifying clause and applicability of the provision on
services (amendment Article 19);
(7) Prohibited predatory pricing and other behaviors impeding fair competition, and listed undue
gift-giving and prize-giving practice in the Chapter of Unfair Competition (amendment Subparagraph
3, Article 20 & Article 23);
(8) Revised the clause regarding enterprise causing another enterprise to participate in restrictive trade
practices (amendment Paragraph 4, Article 20);
(9) Abolished the Paragraph 5, Article 19 regarding on unfair competition by acquiring trade secret;
(10) Revised the regulations concerning untrue and misleading advertisements (amendment Article 21);
(11) Revised the regulations concerning counterfeiting (amendment Article 22);
(12) Added the regulations regarding termination of investigation (amendment Article 28);
(13) Categorized the penalties (amendment Article 39, Article 40 and Article 42);
(14) Extended the time for imposing sanctions on anti-competitive practices to 5 years (amendment Article
41);
(15) Added the liability of the members of trade association or other institution (amendment Article 43);
(16) Abolished the applicability of the Fair Trade Act case to the Appeal Act (amendment Article 48).
4. Enactment of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act and related regulations
1) Enactment of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act
The management of multi-level marketing enterprises and their practices mainly relied on the previous
provisions of the Article 23, Article 23-1, Article 23-2, Article 23-3, and Article 23-4 of the Fair Trade Act,
and the provisions of the Supervisory Regulations Governing Multi-level Sales which was stipulated by the
authority of the said Act. However, the inclusion of management of multi-level marketing in the Fair Trade
-70-
Act was only a matter of expediency. Considering the Fair Trade Act is a competition law in nature and aims
at regulating of anti-competitive behaviors and unfair competition practices rather than managing multi-level
marketing, as well as the different criteria and conditions for penalties, the FTC decided to draft the
Multi-level Marketing Supervision Bill to set up a separate law for multi-level marketing supervision.
The Bill was sent to the Legislative Yuan for consideration by the Executive Yuan in June 2011.
Although the Economic Affairs Committee of the Legislative Yuan held review board for the Bill, it did not
finalized the review process by the end of the 7th
Members’ term. The FTC then reconsidered the Bill and
submitted it to the Executive Yuan once again on June 19, 2012. The Executive Yuan then reviewed and
passed the amendments in the cabinet meeting on December 6, 2012, and presented the Bill to the
Legislative Yuan on December 11, 2012, for another consideration. On January 14, 2014, the Legislative
Yuan in its 18th
Meeting of the 4th
Session of the 8th
Members’ passed the second and the third reading of the
Bill. The Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act (the MLMSA) was promulgated and enacted by the
Presidential Decree No. 10300013741 on 29, January, 2014.
The Act separated provisions regarding multi-level sales management from the Fair Trade Act and
upgraded the legal ranking of the Supervisory Regulations. The major aspects of the MLMSA included:
(1) the legislative purpose, the competent authority, and the definitions (Article 1 to Article 5);
(2) the registration, the revision of recordation, and the announcement of termination of multi-level
marketing business (Article 6 to Article 9);
(3) the obligations of MLM enterprise to notify and explain to its participants (Article 10 to Article 12);
(4) the formation and contents of the written contract between the MLM enterprise and its participants
(Article 13 to Article 14);
(5) the breaches of the contract by participants and its legal consequences (Article 15);
(6) the prohibition of MLM enterprise to enroll persons with no capacity to be participants, and the
requested formation for MLM enterprise to enroll persons with limited capacity (Article 16);
(7) the obligation of the MLM enterprise to disclose its financial statement (Article 17);
(8) the prohibition of pyramid selling and undue practices of multi-level marketing (Article 18 and Article
19);
(9) the statutory requirements for participants to rescind or terminate the contract, and the rights and
obligations thereof (Article 20 and Article 21);
(10) the prohibition of the MLM enterprises of claiming damages or levying penalties against participants
for exercising the right to rescind or terminate the contract, and improperly hindering participants from
returning goods or services arising from rescinding or terminating the contract (Article 22 and Article
23);
(11) the provisions of chapter on rescission or termination of the contract in the MLMSA shall be
applicable to serviced provided by the MLM enterprise (Article 24) ;
-71-
(12) the onsite inspection, investigation, and the procedure to issue sanction by the competent authority
(Article 25 to Article 28);
(13) the criminal penalty and the administrative sanction of violation of the MLMSA (Article 29 to Article
35);
(14) the supplementary provisions stipulating the application of this MLMSA to MLM enterprise not
fallen into the definition described in the Article 8 of the previous Fair Trade Act (Article 36);
(15) the supplementary provisions stipulating the obligation of MLM enterprise registered with the FTC
prior to the enactment of the MLMSA to amend its recordation in line with the provisions the
MLMSA (Article 37);
(16) the establishment of the protection institution by the designated registered MLM enterprises to protect
the rights of the registered MLM enterprises and its participants, and to settle the disputes between
them (Article 38) ; and
(17) the previous relevant provisions stipulated in the Fair Trade Act regarding the multi-level marketing
ceased to be applicable once the MLMSA came into force (Article 39).
2) Enactment of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act
To respond to the promulgation and enactment and to facilitate the building a comprehensive legal
system of the MLMSA, the FTC issued the Enforcement Rules of the Multi-level Marketing Supervision Act,
the Criterion for Multi-level Marketing Enterprises Filing Reports for Record or Amendment, Thresholds for
Multi-level Marketing Enterprises’ Financial Statements Required to be Audited by Certified Public
Accountants, and Regulations for the Establishment and Administration of the Multi-level Marketing
Enterprises and Participants Protection Institute, revised the Enforcement Rules of the Fair Trade Act, the
Regulations Governing the Security Maintenance Program for Personal Information Files and the Methods
Handling Personal Information After Termination of Business by Multi-level Marketing Enterprises,
abolished the Supervisory Regulations Governing Multi-Level Sales, reconsidered and revised the Fair Trade
Commission Guidelines on Cases Concerning Multi-level Marketing, and abolished the Notices for
Multi-level Marketing Enterprises Filing Reports for Record or Amendment.
5. Enhancing International Cooperation
1) Bilateral Interaction and Co-operation
In response to the trend of cross-border anticompetitive and unfair trade practices under globalization
of economy, the FTC is actively seeking opportunities to cooperate with foreign competition authorities. In
2014, the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, and
officials from the European Commission, DG Competition came to visit the FTC. The FTC also held high
ranking as well as working level bilateral talks with competition authorities of Japan and Korea respectively
-72-
to exchange views on legal systems and progresses of enforcement work. The FTC has already signed
co-operation arrangements and co-operated closely with counterparts in Australia, New Zealand, France,
Mongolia, Canada, Hungary, and Panama. In December 2014, with the assistance from the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, the “Memorandum of Understanding between the Taiwan Fair Trade Commission and the
French Autorité de la concurrence Regarding the Application of Competition Laws” was finalized. It was the
first cooperative arrangement renewed after the reformation the FTC and contributed to maintain and
broaden the cooperative relationship between each other.
2) Participation in the International Conferences
Active participation in the international organizations’ activities and building partnership with them
facilitate the Fair Trade Commission to learn the more advanced knowledge of competition laws. In 2014,
The FTC kept participating the OECD Competition Committee meetings, the 10th East Asia Top Level
Officials’ Meeting on Competition Policy, the 13th Annual Conference of the ICN in Morocco, the ICN
Workshops on Mergers, and on Cartel respectively, the 8th Seoul International Competition Forum, and the
seminars held by the OECD/Korea Policy Centre. In 2014, the FTC chaired the APEC’s Competition Policy
and Law Group (the CPLG) under the Economic Committee, planned and held the CPLG meetings and
attended the 1st & 2nd Economic Committee meetings.
3) Facilitating Capacity Building Programs for Emerging Agencies
During 1 to 3, October, 2014, the FTC successfully held the ICN Cartel Workshop in Taipei. There
were 165 participants from 41 countries, including but not limited to, officials from Taiwan, the US, the EU,
Australia, as well as India, Mexico, Kenya, Zimbabwe, and Mongolia. The FTC also sent staff as lecturer for
training course jointly held by Japan FTC and JICA for developing countries in September. The FTC has
been actively hosting the international organizations’ competition law workshops as well as providing
technical assistances to developing countries, so as to contribute to the international society and to play a
leading role in the regional competition community.
. Statistical Tables
Cases Received and Self-initiated
-76-
Unit Case
Year & Month Total Sub Total Complaint
Applicationfor
ConcertedAction
Application forConcerted
Action CasesApproved
Request forExplanation
Self-initiatedInvestigation
Total 45 466 42 494 32 159 187 175 6 729 3 419 2 972
81 1992 1 306 1 296 1 039 12 12 13 232 10 82 1993 1 595 1 567 1 243 9 9 112 203 28 83 1994 2 060 2 020 1 499 11 11 262 248 40 84 1995 2 521 2 486 1 768 2 2 435 281 35 85 1996 2 255 2 234 1 636 12 12 334 252 21
86 1997 2 303 2 277 1 480 23 23 561 213 26 87 1998 2 482 2 444 1 335 13 13 863 233 38 88 1999 2 787 2 757 1 522 7 7 1 064 164 30 89 2000 2 735 2 697 1 372 12 12 1 187 126 38 90 2001 2 593 2 556 1 381 4 4 1 089 82 37
91 2002 1 428 1 387 1 186 8 8 132 61 41 92 2003 1 195 1 100 999 12 12 50 39 95 93 2004 1 249 1 148 1 058 2 2 33 55 101 94 2005 1 976 1 833 1 632 7 7 54 140 143 95 2006 1 741 1 440 1 306 9 9 79 46 301
96 2007 1 513 1 340 1 213 3 3 69 55 173 97 2008 1 605 1 507 1 404 6 6 61 36 98 98 2009 1 612 1 501 1 402 6 6 58 35 111 99 2010 1 438 1 299 1 206 - - 45 48 139100 2011 1 863 1 517 1 362 7 6 57 91 346
101 2012 2 555 2 114 1 955 10 7 52 97 441102 2013 2 279 1 973 1 623 4 - 51 295 306103 2014 2 375 2 001 1 538 8 4 68 387 374 1 Jan. 175 150 116 1 1 10 23 25 2 Feb. 97 89 76 - - 2 11 8 3 Mar. 199 167 138 - - 5 24 32 4 Apr. 214 165 110 1 - 6 48 49 5 May 219 185 130 - - 4 51 34 6 June 186 161 129 1 1 5 26 25
7 July 193 163 138 1 - 5 19 30 8 Aug. 188 161 119 - - 9 33 27 9 Sept. 188 158 130 - - 3 25 30 10 Oct. 261 212 149 1 - 7 55 49 11 Nov. 210 177 129 2 1 4 42 33 12 Dec. 245 213 174 1 1 8 30 32
Note: The number of applications for concerted action since 2011 includes applications for approval and for amendment of approved.
1Table 1 Cases Received and Self-initiated by Period
Cases Received
81 - 103
Mergers
1992 - 2014
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
-77-
% Unit Case %
Year ( )Total
CasesReceived
AccumulatedCase
ConclusionRatio
CaseConclusion
Ratio byType
Complaint
Applicationfor
ConcertedAction
MergerApplication
orNotification
Request forExplanation
81 1992 951 947 72.82 73.07 72.86 75.00 61.54 74.57 40.00
82 1993 2 405 2 383 82.90 83.23 81.11 85.71 96.80 90.34 57.89
83 1994 4 373 4 314 88.15 88.35 86.19 96.88 98.19 94.29 75.64
84 1995 6 761 6 666 90.36 90.46 88.34 94.12 98.42 95.75 84.07
85 1996 9 015 8 893 92.58 92.61 90.95 86.96 99.39 96.13 91.04
86 1997 11 501 11 348 95.52 95.52 94.60 84.06 98.19 98.46 95.63
87 1998 14 056 13 869 96.79 96.82 96.06 97.56 98.49 98.80 94.44
88 1999 16 758 16 544 96.82 96.86 95.98 98.88 98.41 99.18 93.86
89 2000 19 522 19 272 97.40 97.44 96.50 96.04 99.19 99.39 93.98
90 2001 22 164 21 884 97.91 97.99 97.00 98.10 99.83 99.51 92.41
91 2002 23 710 23 388 98.52 98.60 97.87 98.23 99.98 100.00 93.60
92 2003 24 942 24 544 98.74 98.88 98.34 100.00 99.98 99.86 90.66
93 2004 26 125 25 643 98.55 98.74 98.18 99.21 99.95 99.86 89.26
94 2005 27 992 27 382 98.27 98.49 97.86 98.51 99.95 99.79 89.31
95 2006 29 689 28 820 98.22 98.56 97.99 99.30 99.92 99.83 88.31
96 2007 31 298 30 253 98.61 98.92 98.52 100.00 99.89 99.96 90.32
97 2008 32 996 31 836 98.96 99.21 98.93 99.34 99.95 99.96 92.43
98 2009 34 717 33 389 99.32 99.40 99.21 99.37 99.94 99.92 97.22
99 2010 36 177 34 727 99.40 99.54 99.39 100.00 99.92 100.00 96.35
100 2011 38 004 36 227 99.34 99.51 99.36 98.79 99.97 99.92 96.00
101 2012 40 435 38 280 99.08 99.38 99.20 100.00 99.89 100.00 94.02
102 2013 42 793 40 269 99.31 99.45 99.30 100.00 99.88 99.90 97.15
103 2014 45 207 42 369 99.43 99.71 99.66 99.47 99.85 99.85 95.49
Note Case conclusion ratio is the number of accumulated cases closed divided by accumulated cases received by the end of each year.
%%
Table 2 Accumulated Cases and Accumulated Cases Conclusion Ratio
End of 1992 - 2014
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
(%)FTC Self-initiated
InvestigationsCases
Conclusion Ratio
-78-
Year & Month Total Cases DecisionStatements
No-actionDecision
AdministrativeAction
Total 32 050 3 011 3 040 6 248 350
81 1992 757 51 51 100 - 82 1993 1 094 79 79 199 7 83 1994 1 408 118 118 306 40 84 1995 1 643 158 158 280 75 85 1996 1 633 178 178 325 62
86 1997 1 662 206 206 315 34 87 1998 1 409 225 225 278 23 88 1999 1 453 154 154 281 17 89 2000 1 384 202 202 301 13 90 2001 1 404 192 192 252 6
91 2002 1 284 189 189 218 4 92 2003 1 056 123 123 195 3 93 2004 1 012 101 101 176 8 94 2005 1 541 97 97 225 11 95 2006 1 304 101 101 390 15
96 2007 1 304 112 112 342 2 97 2008 1 477 101 101 353 2 98 2009 1 456 140 140 352 3 99 2010 1 243 109 109 291 1100 2011 1 346 110 116 278 15
101 2012 1 895 86 96 316 6102 2013 1 643 102 110 276 1103 2014 1 642 77 82 199 2 1 Jan. 150 12 11 17 - 2 Feb. 86 7 7 15 - 3 Mar. 151 5 5 18 - 4 Apr. 122 9 9 14 1 5 May 134 7 7 21 1 6 June 137 12 16 7 -
7 July 151 7 7 25 - 8 Aug. 126 1 1 17 - 9 Sept. 141 5 6 21 - 10 Oct. 138 1 1 13 - 11 Nov. 131 3 4 11 - 12 Dec. 175 8 8 20 -
81 - 103
Decision
-79-
Unit Case
Sub Total Criminal Cases Civil Cases Cases Beyond FTCResponsibility
Cases not Meetingthe ProceduralRequirements
Cases Consolidated
20 369 374 5 238 7 732 7 025 2 072
591 10 224 235 122 15 749 9 155 291 294 60 852 8 277 301 266 92 997 20 321 362 294 133 931 7 367 295 262 137
912 17 330 299 266 195 773 21 213 303 236 110 912 19 256 347 290 89 759 15 229 340 175 109 825 21 208 385 211 129
798 23 265 305 205 75 659 16 203 215 225 76 680 11 224 237 208 47
1 114 24 271 430 389 94 713 9 179 336 189 85
762 7 221 333 201 86 967 7 186 413 361 54 909 19 188 380 322 52 793 15 140 323 315 49 898 14 153 333 398 45
1 340 22 192 429 697 1471 160 16 175 386 583 1041 275 44 261 454 516 89
93 5 21 42 25 28 61 - 6 31 24 3
113 6 18 56 33 15 94 6 20 37 31 4 96 2 11 36 47 9
112 3 19 32 58 6
112 3 26 36 47 7 107 1 24 33 49 1 115 5 21 39 50 - 120 2 41 30 47 4 109 7 22 32 48 8 143 4 32 50 57 4
Note The number of decisions includes complaints only and excludes FTC self-initiated investigation cases.
Table 3 Result of Complaints by Case-closure Time
1992 - 2014
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
Termination of Review
-80-
Unit Case
Classification TotalCases Decision
Statements
No-actionDecision
AdministrativeAction
Terminationof Review
CasesConsolidated
1 642 77 82 199 2 1 275 89Complaints
1 376 55 57 123 2 1 142 54General Public
178 15 18 63 - 89 11Business Firm
4 - - 1 - 3 -Foundation
9 2 2 2 - 5 -Trade Association
- - - - - - -Elected Representative
58 5 5 8 - 23 22Government Agency
1 - - - - 1 -Foreign Enterprise
1 - - - - 1 -Cooperative
15 - - 2 11 2Others
1 642 77 82 199 2 1 275 89Complained Entity
77 7 7 11 54 5General Public
1 460 67 72 184 2 1 123 84Business Firm
8 - - - - 8 -Foundation
36 2 2 2 32 -Trade Association
- - - - - - -Elected Representative
16 - - - - 16 -Government Agency
2 - - - - 2 -Foreign Enterprise
- - - - - - -Cooperative
43 1 1 2 40 -Others
2014
Table 4 Results of Complaints by Classification of Complainant and Complained Entity
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept. and Information andEconomic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
Decision
-81-
Unit Case
Year Total GeneralPublic
BusinessFirm
Foundation TradeAssociation
ElectedRepresentative
GovernmentAgency
ForeignEnterprise
Cooperative Others
Total 32 050 23 974 5 054 228 611 164 1 521 124 17 357
81 1992 757 624 74 6 20 5 15 2 - 11
82 1993 1 094 805 136 21 31 6 34 41 - 20
83 1994 1 408 1 070 184 16 40 17 35 23 - 23
84 1995 1 643 1 295 200 22 49 20 34 6 1 16
85 1996 1 633 1 248 245 15 41 6 51 7 2 18
86 1997 1 662 1 248 275 11 47 13 53 1 1 13
87 1998 1 409 976 308 16 36 5 44 10 - 14
88 1999 1 453 965 323 16 35 11 81 2 3 17
89 2000 1 384 836 292 11 44 19 166 5 1 10
90 2001 1 404 924 278 5 34 9 134 6 1 13
91 2002 1 284 820 288 8 23 7 102 10 2 24
92 2003 1 056 687 228 11 35 8 72 1 - 14
93 2004 1 012 681 224 7 21 8 59 1 1 10
94 2005 1 541 1 198 201 3 23 7 94 2 2 11
95 2006 1 304 941 245 6 12 7 75 1 - 17
96 2007 1 304 1 000 208 9 19 6 43 - - 19
97 2008 1 477 1 108 205 6 20 2 118 2 1 15
98 2009 1 456 1 164 190 3 22 1 43 1 - 32
99 2010 1 243 985 181 15 9 - 37 1 - 15
100 2011 1 346 1 063 213 9 13 1 40 - 1 6
101 2012 1 895 1 569 209 4 16 1 81 1 - 14
102 2013 1 643 1 391 169 4 12 5 52 - - 10
103 2014 1 642 1 376 178 4 9 - 58 1 1 15
5Table 5 Results of Complaints by Classification of Complainant and Period
1992 - 2014
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
-82-
Unit Case
Year TotalGeneralPublic
BusinessFirm Foundation
TradeAssociation
ElectedRepresentative
GovernmentAgency
ForeignEnterprise Cooperative Others
Total 32 050 1 090 28 065 201 555 7 1 291 68 106 667
81 1992 757 19 608 6 23 - 67 - - 34
82 1993 1 094 28 891 10 40 - 94 2 - 29
83 1994 1 408 44 1 168 15 46 - 99 4 1 31
84 1995 1 643 51 1 325 7 53 - 155 2 12 38
85 1996 1 633 45 1 394 9 24 - 121 2 13 25
86 1997 1 662 37 1 433 5 34 1 113 3 12 24
87 1998 1 409 53 1 192 12 21 - 87 6 27 11
88 1999 1 453 48 1 237 8 26 - 83 8 10 33
89 2000 1 384 42 1 168 9 29 - 97 1 5 33
90 2001 1 404 42 1 245 13 14 - 57 8 8 17
91 2002 1 284 46 1 138 14 17 4 34 3 4 24
92 2003 1 056 44 934 5 12 - 35 4 4 18
93 2004 1 012 23 907 10 16 - 33 4 2 17
94 2005 1 541 45 1 376 15 40 - 39 2 1 23
95 2006 1 304 40 1 190 11 8 - 29 1 - 25
96 2007 1 304 39 1 195 7 10 1 26 1 1 24
97 2008 1 477 59 1 307 11 27 - 22 3 2 46
98 2009 1 456 73 1 295 5 16 - 20 1 - 46
99 2010 1 243 69 1 108 6 11 - 25 2 1 21
100 2011 1 346 50 1 232 7 10 - 10 3 - 34
101 2012 1 895 54 1 751 4 26 - 14 3 2 41
102 2013 1 643 62 1 511 4 16 1 15 3 1 30
103 2014 1 642 77 1 460 8 36 - 16 2 - 43
Table 6 Results of Complaints by Classification of Complained Entity and Period
1992 - 2014
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
-83-
Unit Case
Industrial Classification forComplained Entity
Total Cases DecisionStatements
No-actionDecision
AdministrativeAction
Terminationof Review
CasesConsolidated
Total 1 642 77 82 199 2 1 275 89
21 2 2 5 - 13 1Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Animal Husbandry
19 2 2 4 - 12 1Agriculture and Animal Husbandry
- - - - - - -Forestry
2 - - 1 - 1 -Fishing and Aquaculture
Mining and Quarrying 3 - - - - 1 2- - - - - - -
Extraction of Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas 3 - - - - 1 2
Quarrying of Stone, Sand and Clay- - - - - - -
Other Mining and Quarrying
Manufacturing 218 9 9 51 - 129 29 39 - - 1 - 32 6
Manufacture of Food Products 2 - - - - 2 -
Manufacture of Beverages- - - - - - -
Manufacture of Tobacco Products 1 - - - - 1 -
Manufacture of Textiles 4 - - 2 - 2 -
Manufacture of Wearing Apparel and Clothing Accessories
5 - - 1 - 3 1Manufacture of Leather, Fur and Related Products
3 - - - - 3 -Manufacture of Wood and of Products of Wood and Bamboo
7 1 1 1 - 4 1Manufacture of Paper and Paper Products
2 - - - - 2 -Printing and Reproduction of Recorded Media
1 - - - - 1 -Manufacture of Petroleum and Coal Products
2 - - 2 - - -Manufacture of Chemical Material
26 - - 4 - 3 19Manufacture of Chemical Products
5 - - 2 - 3 - Manufacture of Pharmaceuticals and Medicinal Chemical Products
1 - - 1 - - -Manufacture of Rubber Products
Table 7 Results of Complaints by Industry of Complained Entity
2014
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
Decision
-84-
Industrial Classification forComplained Entity
Total Cases DecisionStatements
No-actionDecision
AdministrativeAction
Terminationof Review
CasesConsolidated
2 - - 2 - - -Plastics Products Manufacturing
1 1 1 - - - - Nonmetallic Mineral Products Manufacturing
2 - - - - 2 -Basic Metals Manufacturing
5 1 1 2 - 2 -Fabricated Metal Products Manufacturing
8 - - 4 - 3 1Electronic Parts and Components Manufacturing
55 2 2 11 - 41 1Computers, Electronic and OpticalProducts Manufacturing
5 2 2 2 - 1 -Electrical Equipment Manufacturing
7 - - 4 - 3 -Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing
19 1 1 7 - 11 -Motor Vehicles and Parts Manufacturing
7 - - 2 - 5 -Other Transport Equipment and Parts Manufacturing
3 - - - - 3 -Furniture Manufacturing
6 1 1 3 - 2 -Other Manufacturing
- - - - - - -Repair and Installation of Industrial Machineryand Equipment
6 - - 1 - 5 -Electricity and Gas Supply
4 - - 3 - 1 - Water Supply and Remediation Activities
1 - - 1 - - -Water Supply
3 - - 2 - 1 -Wastewater (Sewage) Treatment
- - - - - - -Waste Collection, Treatment and DisposalActivities; Materials Recovery
- - - - - - - Remediation Activities and Other Waste
Management Services
Construction 5 1 1 1 - 3 -
3 - - - - 3 -Construction of Buildings
- - - - - - -Civil Engineering
Decision
-85-
Unit Case
Industrial Classification forComplained Entity
Total Cases DecisionStatements
No-actionDecision
AdministrativeAction
Termination ofReview
CasesConsolidated
2 1 1 1 - - -Specialized Construction Activities
Wholesale and Retail Trade 686 39 43 65 - 540 42
26 2 2 8 - 14 2Wholesale Trade
260 18 19 31 - 200 11Retail Trade
400 19 22 26 - 326 29Retail Trade not in Stores or Stalls
Transportation and Storage 42 2 4 3 1 32 4
20 1 3 2 1 14 2Land Transportation
2 - - - - 2 -Water Transportation
8 1 1 1 - 6 -Air Transport
8 - - - - 6 2Support Activities for Transportation
- - - - - - -Warehousing and Storage
4 - - - - 4 -Postal and Courier Activities
63 2 2 9 - 52 -Accommodation and Food Service Activities
13 - - - - 13 -Accommodation
50 2 2 9 - 39 -Food and Beverage Service Activities
203 3 3 22 - 174 4Information and Communication
16 1 1 2 - 13 -Publishing Activities
4 - - 1 - 3 -Motion Picture, Video and Television Programme
Production, Sound Recording and MusicPublishing Activities
14 1 1 5 - 8 -Programming and Broadcasting Activities
118 1 1 7 - 106 4Telecommunications
9 - - 3 - 6 -Computer Systems Design Services
42 - - 4 - 38 -Information Service Activities
Financial and Insurance Activities 46 - - 6 - 39 1
Table 7 Results of Complaints by Industry of Complained Entity (Cont.1)
Decision
-86-
Industrial Classification forComplained Entity
Total Cases DecisionStatements
No-actionDecision
AdministrativeAction
Termination ofReview
CasesConsolidated
28 - - 3 - 25 -Financial Intermediation
11 - - 2 - 8 1Insurance
7 - - 1 - 6 -Securities, Futures and Other Financing
Real Estate Activities 123 12 11 11 1 97 2
67 6 5 7 1 52 1Real Estate Development Activities
56 6 6 4 - 45 1Real Estate Operation and Related Activities
13 - - 4 - 9 -Professional, Scientific and Technical Activities
- - - - - - -Legal and Accounting Activities
2 - - 1 - 1 -Activities of Head Offices; ManagementConsultancy Activities
1 - - 1 - - -Architecture and Engineering Activities;Technical Testing and Analysis
- - - - - - -Scientific Research and Development
1 - - - - 1 -Advertising and Market Research
- - - - - - -Specialized Design Activities
- - - - - - -Veterinary Activities
9 - - 2 - 7 -Other Professional, Scientific and Technical Activities
Support Service Activities 28 - - 3 - 25 -
5 - - 1 - 4 -Rental and Leasing Activities
3 - - 1 - 2 -Employment Activities
17 - - - - 17 -Travel Agency, Tour Operator, ReservationService and Related Activities
- - - - - - -Security and Investigation Activities
2 - - 1 - 1 -Services to Buildings and Landscape Activities
1 - - - - 1 -Business and Office Support Activities
Decision
-87-
Unit Case
Industrial Classification forComplained Entity
Total Cases DecisionStatements
No-actionDecision
AdministrativeAction
Termination ofReview
CasesConsolidated
2 - - - - 2 -Public Administration and Defence; Compulsory Social Security
2 - - - - 2 -Public Administration and Defence;Compulsory Social Security
- - - - - - - Activities of Extraterritorial Organizations
and Bodies
Education 30 2 2 4 - 22 2
26 - - 1 - 25 -Human Health and Social Work Activities
20 - - 1 - 19 -Human Health Activities
2 - - - - 2 -Residential Care Activities
4 - - - - 4 -Social Work Activities without Accommodation
32 - - 5 - 27 -Arts, Entertainment and Recreation
3 - - 2 - 1 -Creative, Arts and Entertainment Activities
1 - - - - 1 -Libraries, Archives, Museums and OtherCultural Activities
- - - - - - -Gambling and Betting Activities
28 - - 3 - 25 - Sports Activities and Amusement and
Recreation Activities
Other Service Activities 48 5 5 2 - 39 2
3 2 2 - - 1 -Activities of Membership Organizations
7 - - - - 7 -Maintenance and Repair of Personal andHousehold Goods
38 3 3 2 - 31 2Other Personal Service Activities
Others 43 - - 3 - 40 -
Table 7 Results of Complaints by Industry of Complained Entity (Cont.2)
Decision
-88-
Unit case
Area Classification forComplained Entity Total
Cases DecisionStatements
No-actionDecision
AdministrativeAction
Terminationof Review
CasesConsolidated
Total 1 642 77 82 199 2 1 275 89
New Taipei City 111 8 10 18 - 82 3
Taipei City 790 29 26 94 2 613 52
Taoyuan City 69 5 5 12 - 47 5
Taichung City 112 15 16 21 - 68 8 Tainan City 32 1 1 9 - 21 1 Kaohsiung City 76 6 8 4 - 54 12
Yilan County 5 1 1 - - 4 - Hsinchu County 19 1 1 6 - 12 - Miaoli County 84 2 2 1 - 80 1
Changhua County 16 1 1 9 - 6 - Nantou County 1 - - - - 1 - Yunlin County 9 - - 3 - 5 1
Chiayi County 11 3 3 - - 7 1 Pintung County 9 - - 1 - 8 - Taitung County 3 1 1 - - - 2
Hualien County 3 - - - - 3 - Penghu County 1 - - - - 1 -
Keelung City 2 - - 1 - 1 -
Hsinchu City 12 1 1 1 - 10 - Chiayi City 8 1 1 - - 7 -
Kinmen County 1 - - - - 1 -
Lienchiang County - - - - - - -
Others 268 2 5 19 - 244 3
Note "Others" includes areas cannot be classified into a single city (county), area uncertain, and area located outside territorial boundaries.Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
Table 8 Results of Complaints by Area of Complained Entity
2014
Decision
-89-
Unit Case
Year & Month Applications Total Sub-Total Approved Rejected PartiallyApproved
Terminationof Review
Total 187 186 174 131 10 11 22 12
81 1992 12 9 9 5 3 - 1 - 82 1993 9 9 9 7 1 - 1 - 83 1994 11 13 13 9 3 1 - - 84 1995 2 1 1 - - 1 - - 85 1996 12 8 8 5 - - 3 -
86 1997 23 18 18 11 - 1 6 - 87 1998 13 22 22 18 - 4 - - 88 1999 7 8 8 4 2 - 2 - 89 2000 12 9 9 6 1 2 - - 90 2001 4 6 6 3 - - 3 -
91 2002 8 8 8 6 - - 2 - 92 2003 12 14 14 12 - 2 - - 93 2004 2 1 1 1 - - - - 94 2005 7 6 6 5 - - 1 - 95 2006 9 10 10 9 - - 1 -
96 2007 3 4 4 4 - - - - 97 2008 6 5 5 5 - - - - 98 2009 6 6 6 6 - - - - 99 2010 - 1 1 1 - - - -100 2011 7 5 4 3 - - 1 1
101 2012 10 12 9 8 - - 1 3102 2013 4 4 - - - - - 4103 2014 8 7 3 3 - - - 4 1 Jan. 1 - - - - - - - 2 Feb. - - - - - - - - 3 Mar. - 1 1 1 - - - - 4 Apr. 1 1 - - - - - 1 5 May - - - - - - - - 6 June 1 - - - - - - -
7 July 1 1 - - - - - 1 8 Aug. - 1 1 1 - - - - 9 Sept. - - - - - - - - 10 Oct. 1 1 - - - - - 1 11 Nov. 2 - - - - - - - 12 Dec. 1 2 1 1 - - - 1
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept. of the Fair Trade Commission.
Application for Concerted Action
AmendingConcerted Action
Approval Item
9Table 9 Applications for Concerted Action
1992 - 2014
No. of Case Closed
-90-
1992 - 2014 Unit Case
Year & Month Subpara.1 Subpara.2 Subpara.3 Subpara.5 Subpara.7
Total 142 21 41 11 81 1
81 1992 5 - - - 5 - 82 1993 7 - - - 7 - 83 1994 10 1 2 - 8 - 84 1995 1 1 - - - - 85 1996 5 - 2 - 3 -
86 1997 12 - 1 - 10 1 87 1998 22 - 20 10 2 - 88 1999 4 - 1 - 3 - 89 2000 8 1 1 - 6 - 90 2001 3 - 2 - 1 -
91 2002 6 2 2 - 2 - 92 2003 14 1 8 - 5 - 93 2004 1 - - - 1 - 94 2005 5 1 1 - 3 - 95 2006 9 5 - - 4 -
96 2007 4 2 - - 2 - 97 2008 5 1 - - 4 - 98 2009 6 2 - - 4 - 99 2010 1 - - - 1 -100 2011 3 - - - 3 -
101 2012 8 4 1 1 4 -102 2013 - - - - - -103 2014 3 - - - 3 - 1 Jan. - - - - - - 2 Feb. - - - - - - 3 Mar. 1 - - - 1 - 4 Apr. - - - - - - 5 May - - - - - - 6 June - - - - - -
7 July - - - - - - 8 Aug. 1 - - - 1 - 9 Sept. - - - - - - 10 Oct. - - - - - - 11 Nov. - - - - - - 12 Dec. 1 - - - 1 -
Note The number of types of concerted action applications may exceed the cases of approvals because an approval may involve more than one type of concerted action.
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept. of the Fair Trade Commission.
10Table 10 Approvals for Concerted Action by Types of Concerted Action
( 14 1 )Types of Concerted Action (Paragraph 1,Article 14 of FTA)
Approved orPartially
Approved
-91-
Unit Case
Year & Month Cases ofApplication Total
Approved orMerger notProhibited
Rejected orMerger
Prohibited
Termination ofReview
CasesConsolidated
Total 6 729 6 719 6 281 10 400 28
Applications for Merger 81 90 1992~2001 5 920 5 910 5 811 3 73 23
91 2002 89 99 93 - 4 2 1 2 Jan.-Feb.
Notifications for Merger 91 2002 43 42 24 1 17 - 2 12 Feb.-Dec. 92 2003 50 50 31 - 19 - 93 2004 33 31 18 - 13 - 94 2005 54 54 34 - 20 - 95 2006 79 77 34 - 42 1
96 2007 69 67 37 1 29 - 97 2008 61 65 36 2 27 - 98 2009 58 57 27 2 28 - 99 2010 45 44 19 1 24 -100 2011 57 60 28 - 32 -
101 2012 52 47 26 - 20 1102 2013 51 50 30 - 19 1103 2014 68 66 33 - 33 - 1 Jan. 10 4 4 - - - 2 Feb. 2 7 4 - 3 - 3 Mar. 5 6 4 - 2 - 4 Apr. 6 6 4 - 2 - 5 May 4 7 4 - 3 - 6 June 5 5 2 - 3 -
7 July 5 5 1 - 4 - 8 Aug. 9 5 2 - 3 - 9 Sept. 3 4 2 - 2 - 10 Oct. 7 9 2 - 7 - 11 Nov. 4 3 2 - 1 - 12 Dec. 8 5 2 - 3 -
Note The amendment of the Fair Trade Act on February 6, 2002 changed the previous "pre-merger approval application"to the "pre-merger notification", the "approval" of the application to "not prohibited" of the notification, and the "rejectionof the application" to "prohibition of the notification".
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept. of the Fair Trade Commission.
Table 11 Applications and Notifications for Merger
1992 - 2014
( ) Applications & Notifications for MergerConcluded Cases
6 009 6 009 5 904 3 77 25
720 710 377 7 323 3
-92-
Unit Case
Year & Month Subpara.1 Subpara.2 Subpara.3 Subpara.4 Subpara.5
Total 6 281 138 447 179 69 5 689
81 1992 6 3 1 2 - - 82 1993 107 3 9 1 - 94 83 1994 259 5 10 4 - 240 84 1995 426 4 12 2 1 408 85 1996 339 3 14 3 6 314
86 1997 535 5 11 10 5 506 87 1998 843 3 23 16 15 791 88 1999 1 032 6 14 14 - 998 89 2000 1 177 26 16 59 1 1 081 90 2001 1 087 23 59 24 2 997
91 2002 117 6 23 2 - 93 92 2003 31 9 18 4 1 5 93 2004 18 3 13 2 - 4 94 2005 34 6 23 4 3 12 95 2006 34 6 25 1 2 22
96 2007 37 4 21 8 4 18 97 2008 36 2 29 4 4 14 98 2009 27 7 20 3 - 13 99 2010 19 - 15 3 2 10100 2011 28 4 24 2 5 16
101 2012 26 2 21 6 2 16102 2013 30 5 21 2 9 18103 2014 33 3 25 3 7 19 1 Jan. 4 - 4 - - 3 2 Feb. 4 - 3 1 - 3 3 Mar. 4 1 4 - 1 3 4 Apr. 4 - 2 1 3 2 5 May 4 1 3 - - 3 6 June 2 - 2 - 1 1
7 July 1 - - - 1 - 8 Aug. 2 - 1 - 1 1 9 Sept. 2 - 2 - - 2 10 Oct. 2 - 2 - - - 11 Nov. 2 1 - 1 - - 12 Dec. 2 - 2 - - 1
Note Figures adding up may exceed the total due to a merger may be classified into more than one category.Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept. of the Fair Trade Commission.
( 6 1 )By Types of Mergers (Per Paragraph 1,Article 6, FTA)
MergersApproved & not
Prohibited
Table 12 Merger by Types of Mergers
1992 - 2014
-93-
Unit Case
Year & Month Total Sub-Total ExplanationCases
Inquiry-answering
Cases
Terminationof Review
CasesConsolidated
Total 3 414 2 417 634 1 783 939 58
81 1992 173 133 82 51 39 1 82 1993 220 164 83 81 53 3 83 1994 251 180 66 114 59 12 84 1995 279 157 79 78 109 13 85 1996 246 175 73 102 60 11
86 1997 238 148 62 86 86 4 87 1998 235 156 77 79 76 3 88 1999 169 108 34 74 60 1 89 2000 129 89 16 73 39 1 90 2001 84 52 11 41 32 -
91 2002 71 45 8 37 24 2 92 2003 36 28 4 24 7 1 93 2004 55 40 9 31 14 1 94 2005 138 64 6 58 73 1 95 2006 47 35 - 35 12 -
96 2007 58 39 3 36 19 - 97 2008 36 29 7 22 7 - 98 2009 34 25 2 23 9 - 99 2010 50 34 2 32 16 -100 2011 89 55 2 53 33 1
101 2012 99 58 1 57 41 -102 2013 292 266 5 261 26 -103 2014 385 337 2 335 45 3 1 Jan. 22 20 - 20 2 - 2 Feb. 11 10 1 9 1 - 3 Mar. 23 21 - 21 2 - 4 Apr. 49 36 1 35 10 3 5 May 52 47 - 47 5 - 6 June 26 22 - 22 4 -
7 July 20 17 - 17 3 - 8 Aug. 26 20 - 20 6 - 9 Sept. 33 32 - 32 1 - 10 Oct. 54 48 - 48 6 - 11 Nov. 41 38 - 38 3 - 12 Dec. 28 26 - 26 2 -
Table 13 Results of Explanation Request by Case-closure Time
Explanation and Reply Requests
1992 - 2014
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs of the Fair Trade Commission.
-94-
Initiated Cases Decision Statements
Total 2 972 2 838 1 004 1 138
81 1992 10 4 3 13 82 1993 28 18 11 14 83 1994 40 37 19 39 84 1995 35 36 21 21 85 1996 21 27 16 27
86 1997 26 31 22 27 87 1998 38 34 28 28 88 1999 30 27 14 16 89 2000 38 36 18 24 90 2001 37 30 19 20
91 2002 41 42 29 29 92 2003 95 76 33 64 93 2004 101 84 34 34 94 2005 143 128 44 44 95 2006 301 259 58 74
96 2007 173 176 66 72 97 2008 98 115 61 68 98 2009 111 168 42 43 99 2010 139 122 44 46100 2011 346 327 151 156
101 2012 441 378 102 107102 2013 306 369 102 104103 2014 374 314 67 68 1 Jan. 25 28 5 5 2 Feb. 8 15 4 4 3 Mar. 32 19 5 5 4 Apr. 49 34 7 7 5 May 34 30 9 9 6 June 25 13 - -
7 July 30 21 5 5 8 Aug. 27 42 8 8 9 Sept. 30 19 2 2 10 Oct. 49 31 10 10 11 Nov. 33 31 7 8 12 Dec. 32 31 5 5
81 - 103
Established Cases Closed CasesYear & Month
Subject to Cases Decision
-95-
Unit Case
Firms Subject toDecision
No-action Decision AdministrativeAction
InvestigationTerminated
Others
1 652 791 113 635 295
18 - 1 - - 19 1 5 1 - 39 10 3 5 - 21 2 8 5 - 27 1 4 6 -
34 2 2 5 - 30 1 3 2 - 31 5 - 8 - 75 7 3 8 - 23 8 2 1 -
29 5 6 2 - 89 9 8 26 - 38 16 8 26 - 54 27 10 41 6 91 131 4 35 31
100 32 23 34 21 93 27 1 21 5
103 31 2 25 68 65 41 2 28 7
230 114 7 42 13
190 112 7 118 39 153 110 1 71 85 100 99 3 125 20
5 9 1 11 2 5 7 - 3 1 5 5 - 9 -
24 12 - 13 2 9 11 - 10 -- 3 - 10 -
13 9 1 5 1 10 8 - 15 11
3 8 - 9 - 12 5 - 16 -
9 7 1 13 3 5 15 - 11 -
Table 14 FTC Self-initiated Investigations
1992 - 2014
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
Note: Anonymous complaints were categorized into FTC self-initiated cases since August, 2012.
Result of Processing
單位:件
獨占行為
(第10條)
結合行為
(第11條)
聯合行為
(第14條)
約定轉售
價 格
(第18條)
妨礙公平
競爭行為
(第19條)
Year & MonthDecision
Statementsfor
Complaints
Anti-competitive
Practice
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
ConcertedActions
(Article 14)
Resale PriceMaintenance(Article 18)
Impeding FairCompetition(Article 19)
總 計 Total 3 040 319 10 41 119 46 109 81年 1992 51 9 - - 3 2 4 82年 1993 79 7 - - - 3 4 83年 1994 118 6 - - 2 1 3 84年 1995 158 24 - - 5 2 19 85年 1996 178 16 - 1 3 4 8 86年 1997 206 13 - 1 5 2 5 87年 1998 225 21 - 4 8 2 8 88年 1999 154 22 - 8 7 - 7 89年 2000 202 27 2 2 15 1 7 90年 2001 192 16 1 1 12 - 3 91年 2002 189 15 3 1 8 1 3 92年 2003 123 16 - 1 6 2 7 93年 2004 101 10 - 4 3 - 3 94年 2005 97 14 1 - 9 2 2 95年 2006 101 13 - 1 6 3 3 96年 2007 112 12 - 3 5 3 1 97年 2008 101 8 - 3 3 - 2 98年 2009 140 10 - 1 4 3 2 99年 2010 109 9 - 1 3 - 5100年 2011 116 4 - - 1 1 3101年 2012 96 9 - 1 4 - 4102年 2013 110 23 3 5 3 9 3103年 2014 82 15 - 3 4 5 3 1月 Jan. 11 1 - - 1 - - 2月 Feb. 7 3 - - - 2 1 3月 Mar. 5 - - - - - - 4月 Apr. 9 4 - - 1 3 - 5月 May 7 1 - - - - 1 6月 June 16 4 - 3 - - 1
7月 July 7 - - - - - - 8月 Aug. 1 - - - - - - 9月 Sept. 6 1 - - 1 - - 10月 Oct. 1 - - - - - - 11月 Nov. 4 1 - - 1 - - 12月 Dec. 8 - - - - - -
說 明:1.部分案件違法行為達二種以上,因此各違法行為件數加總超過處分總件數。
2.多層次傳銷管理法於103年1月29日公布施行。
3.個人資料保護法(簡稱個資法)自101年10月1日施行;本會為收辦多層次傳銷違反個資法案件之主管機關。
資料來源:本會服務業競爭處、製造業競爭處、公平競爭處、法律事務處、資訊及經濟分析室。
表15 檢舉案處分概況-按違法行為別分
中華民國81年 - 103年
年月別
違反公平交易法
檢舉案
處分書
件 數限制競爭
行 為
-96-
Unit:Case
仿冒他人
商品或服務
表徵行為
(第20條)
虛偽不實或
引人錯誤
廣告行為
(第21條)
損害他人
營業信譽
行為
(第22條)
欺罔或
顯失公平
行為
(第24條)
UnfairTrade
Practice
CounterfeitingSymbols of
Goods/Services(Article 20)
False, Untrueor MisleadingAdvertisement
(Article 21)
Damage toBusiness
Reputation(Article 22)
Deceptive orObviously
UnfairConducts
(Article 24)
ImproperMulti-level
Sales(Article 23 &23-1~23-4)
Others(2nd Part ofArticle 41、
Para.2 of Article42、Article 43)
2 388 32 1 499 19 915 293 69 9 - 41 1 39 - 1 3 - - - 64 - 54 - 13 7 3 - -
106 - 71 3 42 7 - - - 127 2 89 1 39 4 4 - - 158 1 99 1 59 2 4 - - 177 2 106 3 71 10 11 - - 187 7 100 1 81 13 13 - - 122 - 70 1 55 9 3 - - 164 5 77 1 83 13 1 - - 148 5 48 - 99 23 5 - - 142 1 58 - 84 31 1 - -
86 2 39 - 48 20 3 - - 69 1 38 1 30 20 3 - - 61 2 41 - 24 19 3 - - 82 - 61 2 22 7 - - - 81 1 73 - 9 18 4 - - 77 1 57 - 23 15 1 - -
119 1 93 4 27 11 1 - - 87 - 67 - 22 12 1 - - 92 - 68 - 30 15 5 - - 68 - 53 1 16 20 1 - - 75 - 56 - 20 11 1 - - 55 - 42 - 17 3 1 9 -
8 - 7 - 2 3 - - - 4 - 4 - - - - - - 4 - 4 - 1 - - 1 - 4 - 3 - 1 - 1 - - 6 - 5 - 1 - - - - 8 - 5 - 4 - - 4 -
6 - 3 - 4 - - 1 - 1 - - - 1 - - - - 5 - 5 - - - - - - 1 - - - 1 - - - - 1 - 1 - - - - 2 - 7 - 5 - 2 - - 1 -
involve more than one illegal practice.
Table 15 Complaints Subject to Decision Ruling-by Illegal Practices
1992 - 2014
Violation of the Fair Trade Act其 他
(第41條後
段、第42條第2項、第
43條)
非法多層次
傳銷行為
(第23條、
第23條之1~之4)
不公平
競爭行為
Note:1.The number of illegal practice may exceed the total case of complaint subject to decision ruling because a case may
Source:Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
3.The Personal Information Protection Act was enacted on October 1, 2012. The FTC is the competent authority of
-97-
applying the said Act on the multi-level sales businesses.
違 反個資法
行 為Violation ofthe PersonalInformationProtection
Act
違 反多層次
傳 銷管理法
行 為Violation ofthe Multi-
LevelMarketing
SupervisionAct
2.The Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act was promulgated and enacted on January 29, 2014.
-98-
( 10 ) ( 11 ) ( 14 ) ( 18 ) ( 19 )
Year & MonthDecision
Statements forSelf-initiatedInvestigation
Anti-competitive
Practice
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
ConcertedActions
(Article 14)
Resale PriceMaintenance(Article 18)
Impeding FairCompetition(Article 19)
Total 1 138 138 4 19 73 16 31 81 1992 13 9 - - 1 8 4 82 1993 14 6 - 3 - - 3 83 1994 39 1 - 1 - - - 84 1995 21 - - - - - - 85 1996 27 8 - 3 2 - 3 86 1997 27 9 - 1 5 - 3 87 1998 28 - - - - - - 88 1999 16 4 - - 4 - - 89 2000 24 7 - - 6 - 1 90 2001 20 2 - - 2 - - 91 2002 29 2 1 - 1 - - 92 2003 64 7 - - 4 - 3 93 2004 34 3 - - 2 - 1 94 2005 44 1 - - 1 - - 95 2006 74 6 - 2 3 - 1 96 2007 72 3 - 1 2 - - 97 2008 68 7 - 1 6 - - 98 2009 43 8 1 3 4 - - 99 2010 46 3 - - 3 - -100 2011 156 15 - 1 7 - 7101 2012 107 19 - - 14 4 2102 2013 104 6 - 1 4 1 -103 2014 68 12 2 2 2 3 3 1 Jan. 5 1 - - - 1 - 2 Feb. 4 1 - - - - 1 3 Mar. 5 - - - - - - 4 Apr. 7 5 1 1 1 - 2 5 May 9 1 1 - - - - 6 June - - - - - - -
- 7 July 5 1 - - 1 - - 8 Aug. 8 1 - 1 - - - 9 Sept. 2 - - - - - - 10 Oct. 10 - - - - - - 11 Nov. 8 2 - - - 2 - 12 Dec. 5 - - - - - -
2. 103 1 29 3. ( ) 101 10 1
81 - 103
-99-
Unit Case
( 20 ) ( 21 ) ( 22 ) ( 24 )
UnfairTrade
Practice
CounterfeitingSymbols of
Goods/Services
(Article 20)
False, Untrueor MisleadingAdvertisement
(Article 21)
Damage toBusiness
Reputation
(Article 22)
Deceptive orObviously
UnfairConducts
(Article 24)
Improper Multi-Level Sales
(Article 23 & 23-1 23-4)
Others(2nd Part ofArticle 41
Para.2 of Article42 Article 43)
620 2 439 1 182 332 44 14 - 4 - 4 - - 1 - - - 1 - 1 - - 4 3 - -
22 - 11 - 11 8 8 - - 6 1 4 - 1 12 3 - -
12 - 11 - 1 3 4 - - 6 - 3 - 3 10 2 - - 5 - 1 - 4 14 10 - - 6 - 1 - 5 6 - - - 6 - 2 - 4 11 - - - 6 - 3 - 3 12 1 - - 3 - 2 - 1 24 - - -
47 - 7 - 40 11 2 - - 13 1 10 - 2 18 1 - - 23 - 21 - 2 20 - - - 57 - 34 - 25 11 - - - 56 - 15 - 41 11 2 - - 41 - 36 - 5 17 3 - - 28 - 27 - 1 7 - - - 32 - 22 - 10 10 1 - - 88 - 83 - 5 54 1 - - 61 - 57 - 4 26 1 - - 57 - 52 1 5 40 2 - - 40 - 32 - 9 2 - 14 -
2 - 1 - 1 2 - - - 3 - 3 - - - - - - 5 - 2 - 3 - - - - 1 - 1 - - - - 1 - 3 - 2 - 1 - - 5 -- - - - - - - - -
3 - 3 - - - - 1 - 4 - 3 - 1 - - 3 - 2 - 2 - - - - - - 9 - 8 - 1 - - 1 - 4 - 4 - 1 - - 2 - 4 - 3 - 1 - - 1 -
involve more than one illegal practice.
applying the said Act on the multi-level sales businesses.
Table 16 Decisions for FTC Self-initiated Investigations Case
1992 - 2014
by Illegal Practices
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
( 2323
1 4)
( 4142
243 )
Note 1.The number of illegal practice may exceed the total case of complaint subject to decision ruling because a case may
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
3.The Personal Information Protection Act was enacted on October 1, 2012. The FTC is the competent authority of
99
Violation ofthe PersonalInformationProtection
Act
Violation ofthe Multi-
LevelMarketing
SupervisionAct
2.The Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act was promulgated and enacted on January 29, 2014.
單位:件
處分書
件數 第1款
DecisionStatements
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
ConcertedActions
(Article 14)
Resale PriceMaintenance(Article 18)
ImpedingFair
Competition(Article 19)
Sub-para.1
總 計 Total 4 178 14 60 192 62 140 12
81年 1992 64 - - 4 10 8 - 82年 1993 93 - 3 - 3 7 1 83年 1994 157 - 1 2 1 3 - 84年 1995 179 - - 5 2 19 6 85年 1996 205 - 4 5 4 11 2
86年 1997 233 - 2 10 2 8 - 87年 1998 253 - 4 8 2 8 - 88年 1999 170 - 8 11 - 7 - 89年 2000 226 2 2 21 1 8 - 90年 2001 212 1 1 14 - 3 -
91年 2002 218 4 1 9 1 3 - 92年 2003 187 - 1 10 2 10 2 93年 2004 135 - 4 5 - 4 1 94年 2005 141 1 - 10 2 2 - 95年 2006 175 - 3 9 3 4 -
96年 2007 184 - 4 7 3 1 - 97年 2008 169 - 4 9 - 2 - 98年 2009 183 1 4 8 3 2 - 99年 2010 155 - 1 6 - 5 -100年 2011 272 - 1 8 1 10 -
101年 2012 203 - 1 18 4 6 -102年 2013 214 3 6 7 10 3 -103年 2014 150 2 5 6 8 6 - 1月 Jan. 16 - - 1 1 - - 2月 Feb. 11 - - - 2 2 - 3月 Mar. 10 - - - - - - 4月 Apr. 16 1 1 2 3 2 - 5月 May 16 1 - - - 1 - 6月 June 16 - 3 - - 1 - 7月 July 12 - - 1 - - - 8月 Aug. 9 - 1 - - - - 9月 Sept. 8 - - 1 - - - 10月 Oct. 11 - - - - - - 11月 Nov. 12 - - 1 2 - - 12月 Dec. 13 - - - - - -
說 明:1.處分件數含檢舉及依職權主動調查案件。
2.部分案件違法行為達二種以上,因此各違法行為件數加總超過處分總件數。
3.多層次傳銷管理法於103年1月29日公布施行。
4.個人資料保護法(簡稱個資法)自101年10月1日施行;本會為收辦多層次傳銷違反個資法案件之主管機關。
資料來源:本會服務業競爭處、製造業競爭處、公平競爭處、法律事務處、資訊及經濟分析室。
表 17 處分案件統計-按違法行為別及條文別分
中華民國81年 - 103年
年月別
Year & Month
違反公平交易法
獨占行為
(第10條)
結合行為
(第11條)
聯合行為
(第14條)
約定轉售
價 格
(第18條)
妨礙公平
競爭行為
(第19條)
-100-
Unit:Case
第2款 第3款 第4款 第5款 第6款
Sub-para.2
Sub-para.3
Sub-para.4
Sub-para.5
Sub-para.6
CounterfeitingSymbols of
Goods/Services(Article 20)
第1款Sub-
para.1
第2款Sub-
para.2
第3款Sub-
para.3
False, Untrue orMisleading
Advertisement(Article 21)
19 20 44 2 47 34 23 10 1 1 938
1 1 1 - 5 1 1 - - 43- - 1 - 5 - - - - 55
1 1 1 - - - - - - 82 4 1 2 - 6 3 1 2 - 93 1 1 5 - 2 1 1 - - 110
2 2 3 - 1 2 2 - - 109 3 1 1 - 4 7 6 1 - 101 1 2 1 - 3 - - - - 71 1 2 1 - 4 5 5 - - 79 2 1 - - - 5 5 - - 51
- 1 - - 2 1 - 1 - 60 1 - 3 - 5 2 - 2 - 46- - 2 - 1 2 1 - 1 48- - 1 - 1 2 - 2 - 62
1 1 1 - 1 - - - - 95
- - - 1 - 1 1 - - 88- - 2 - - 1 - 1 - 93- - 2 - - 1 - 1 - 120- - 4 - 1 - - - - 89
1 3 4 1 3 - - - - 151
- 1 2 - 3 - - - - 110- 1 2 - - - - - - 108- 1 5 - - - - - - 74- - - - - - - - - 8- - 2 - - - - - - 7- - - - - - - - - 6- 1 1 - - - - - - 4- - 1 - - - - - - 7- - 1 - - - - - - 5- - - - - - - - - 6- - - - - - - - - 3- - - - - - - - - 7- - - - - - - - - 8- - - - - - - - - 5- - - - - - - - - 8
Note:1.The number of decision includes complaints and FTC self-initiated investigation. 2.The number of illegal practices may exceed the cases of decision ruling because a case may involve more than one illegal practice.
3.The Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act was promulgated and enacted on January 29, 2014. 4.The Personal Information Protection Act was enacted on October 1, 2012. The FTC is the competent authority of applying the said Act on the multi-level sales businesses.
Table 17 Cases of Decision-by Illegal Practices and Articles
1992 - 2014
Violation of the Fair Trade Act仿冒他人
商品或服務
表徵行為
(第20條)
虛偽不實或
引人錯誤
廣告行為
(第21條)
第1項Para. 1
Source:Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
-101-
-102-
( 22 )Damage toBusiness
Reputation(Article 22)
( 23 231 4)
Improper Multi-level Sales
(Article 23 & 23-1 23-4)
231
PreviousArticle 23
Para. 1
232
PreviousArticle 23
Para. 2
23Current
Article 23
Total 1 483 9 456 20 625 25 112 23
81 1992 31 2 12 - 4 1 4 - 82 1993 35 1 20 - 11 - 11 - 83 1994 65 - 18 3 15 2 15 - 84 1995 72 - 21 1 16 8 16 - 85 1996 97 - 13 1 5 1 5 -
86 1997 96 - 13 3 20 9 17 - 87 1998 84 2 16 1 27 1 27 - 88 1999 47 - 24 1 15 1 13 1 89 2000 52 1 26 1 24 1 3 1 90 2001 34 - 17 - 35 1 1 3
91 2002 47 - 16 - 55 - - 10 92 2003 37 - 9 - 31 - - 5 93 2004 36 2 11 1 38 - - 1 94 2005 49 - 13 - 39 - - 1 95 2006 55 - 40 2 18 - - -
96 2007 71 - 17 - 29 - - 1 97 2008 78 - 15 - 32 - - - 98 2009 88 - 32 4 18 - - - 99 2010 64 - 25 - 22 - - -100 2011 109 - 42 - 69 - - -
101 2012 85 1 25 1 46 - - -102 2013 92 - 16 1 51 - - -103 2014 59 - 15 - 5 - - - 1 Jan. 5 - 3 - 5 - - - 2 Feb. 6 - 1 - - - - - 3 Mar. 3 - 3 - - - - - 4 Apr. 3 - 1 - - - - - 5 May 6 - 1 - - - - - 6 June 4 - 1 - - - - -
7 July 5 - 1 - - - - - 8 Aug. 3 - - - - - - - 9 Sept. 6 - 1 - - - - - 10 Oct. 8 - - - - - - - 11 Nov. 4 - 1 - - - - - 12 Dec. 6 - 2 - - - - -
81 - 103
2
Para. 2
1
Para. 1
Previous
Year & Month
3
Para. 3
-103-
Unit Case
231
Article 23-1
232
Article23-2
233
Article23-3
234
Article23-4
( 24 )Deceptive orObviously
UnfairConducts
(Article 24)
( 41 42 2 )Failure to Cease or
Rectify Conduct Afterthe Prescribed Time (2nd
Part of Article 41Para.2 of Article 42)
( 43 )Refusing
Investigation orProvision of Data
without Justification(Article 43)
17 53 25 478 1 097 86 27 23 -
- - - - 1 - - - -- - - - 13 3 3 - -- - - - 53 8 - - -- - - - 40 6 1 - -- - - - 60 8 - - -
- - - - 74 11 2 - -- - - - 85 20 3 - -- 1 - 2 60 3 - - -
1 3 - 21 87 1 - - - 3 6 1 31 102 4 2 - -
3 4 2 50 85 1 - - - 1 3 1 29 88 3 2 - -- 4 5 36 32 3 1 - -
3 11 3 34 26 2 1 - - 2 3 4 16 47 - - - -
1 4 6 26 50 2 4 - -- 1 - 31 28 1 3 - -- 3 1 15 28 1 - - -
1 4 1 18 32 2 - - -- 1 - 68 35 3 3 - -
- 2 - 45 20 1 1 - - 2 3 1 51 25 2 1 - -- - - 5 26 1 - 23 -- - - 5 3 - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - 4 - - 1 -- - - - 1 1 - 1 -- - - - 2 - - 5 -- - - - 4 - - 4 -
- - - - 4 - - 2 -- - - - 2 - - 3 -- - - - - - - - -- - - - 2 - - 1 -- - - - 1 - - 4 -- - - - 3 - - 2 -
1992 - 2014
Violation ofthe Multi-
LevelMarketing
SupervisionAct
Table 17 Cases of Decision by Illegal Practices and Articles (Cont.)
Violation ofthe PersonalInformationProtection
Act
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
Current
單位:件
獨占行為
(第10條)
結合行為
(第11條)
聯合行為
(第14條)
約定轉售
價 格
(第18條)
妨礙公平
競爭行為
(第19條)
Industry DecisionStatements
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
ConcertedActions
(Article 14)
Resale PriceMaintenance(Article 18)
ImpedingFair
Competition(Article 19)
總計 Total 4 178 14 60 192 62 140農、林、漁、牧業 12 - - 2 - 5Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Animal Husbandry 農、牧業 10 - - 2 - 5 Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 林業 2 - - - - - Forestry 漁業 - - - - - - Fishing and Aquaculture礦業及土石採取業 Mining and Quarrying 23 2 - 1 - 2 石油及天然氣礦業 4 2 - - - 1 Extraction of Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas 砂、石及黏土採取業 19 - - 1 - 1 Quarrying of Stone, Sand and Clay 其他礦業及土石採取業 - - - - - - Other Mining and Quarrying製造業 Manufacturing 471 6 7 38 29 20 食品製造業 54 - 3 9 9 1 Manufacture of Food Products 飲料製造業 27 - - - - - Manufacture of Beverages 菸草製造業 3 - - 1 - 1 Manufacture of Tobacco Products 紡織業 8 - 1 - - - Manufacture of Textiles 成衣及服飾品製造業 2 - - - 1 - Manufacture of Wearing Apparel and Clothing Accessories 皮革、毛皮及其製品製造業 4 - - - 1 - Manufacture of Leather, Fur and Related Products 木竹製品製造業 - - - - - - Manufacture of Wood and of Products of Wood and Bamboo 紙漿、紙及紙製品製造業 5 - 1 1 - - Manufacture of Paper and Paper Products 印刷及資料儲存媒體複製業 11 - - - - 3 Printing and Reproduction of Recorded Media 石油及煤製品製造業 7 - - 1 - 2 Manufacture of Petroleum and Coal Products 化學材料製造業 3 2 - - 1 1 Manufacture of Chemical Material 化學製品製造業 24 - - 1 1 - Manufacture of Chemical Products 藥品及醫用化學製品製造業 7 - - 1 - 1 Manufacture of Pharmaceuticals and Medicinal Chemical Product
橡膠製品製造業 4 - - - - - Manufacture of Rubber Products
說 明:1.處分件數含檢舉及依職權主動調查案件。
2.部分案件違法行為達二種以上,因此各違法行為件數加總超過處分總件數。
3.多層次傳銷管理法於103年1月29日公布施行。
4.個人資料保護法(簡稱個資法)自101年10月1日施行;本會為收辦多層次傳銷違反個資法案件之主管機關。
資料來源:本會服務業競爭處、製造業競爭處、公平競爭處、法律事務處、資訊及經濟分析室。
表 18 處分案件統計-按違法行為別及行業別分
截至中華民國103年底止
行業別處分書
件數
違反公平交易法
-104-
Unit:Case
仿冒他人
商品或服務
表徵行為
(第20條)
虛偽不實
或引人錯誤
廣告行為
(第21條)
損害他人
營業信譽行為
(第22條)
非法多層次
傳銷行為
(第23條、第
23條之1~之4)
欺罔或
顯失公平
行為
(第24條)
其 他(第41條後段、第
42條第2項、
第43條)
CounterfeitingSymbols of
Goods/Services(Article 20)
False, Untrue orMisleading
Advertisement(Article 21)
Damage toBusiness
Reputation(Article 22)
Improper Multi-level Sales
(Articles 23 & 23-1~23-4)
Deceptive orObviously
Unfair Conducts(Article 24)
Others(2nd Part of Article
41、Para.2 ofArticle 42、Article
43)
34 1 938 20 625 1 097 113 23 -- 1 - - 4 - - -
- 1 - - 2 - - -
- - - - 2 - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - 18 - - -- - - - 1 - - -
- - - - 17 - - -
- - - - - - - -
13 168 5 - 199 9 - -- 20 1 - 15 - - -
10 7 - - 9 1 - -
- - - - 1 - - -
- 3 - - 4 - - -
- - - - 1 - - -
1 1 - - 1 - - -
- - - - - - - -
- 1 - - 2 - - -
- 1 - - 10 - - -
1 2 - - 1 - - -
- - - - - - - -
- 12 1 - 10 1 - -
1 1 - - 3 - - -
- 1 - - 2 1 - -
2.The number of illegal practices may exceed the cases of decision ruling because a case may involve more than
4.The Personal Information Protection Act was enacted on October 1, 2012. The FTC is the competent authority of applying the said Act on the multi-level sales businesses.
Table 18 Cases of Decision-by Illegal Practices and Industry
違 反個資法
行 為Violation of
thePersonal
InformationProtection
Act
By the End of 2014
Note:1.The number of decision includes complaints and FTC self-initiated investigation.
Violation of the Fair Trade Act 違反多
層次傳
銷管理
法行為Violation ofthe Multi-
LevelMarketing
SupervisionAct
3.The Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act was promulgated and enacted on January 29, 2014.
-105-
Source:Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
單位:件
獨占行為
(第10條)
結合行為
(第11條)
聯合行為
(第14條)
約定轉售
價 格
(第18條)
妨礙公平
競爭行為
(第19條)
Industry DecisionStatements
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
ConcertedActions
(Article 14)
Resale PriceMaintenance(Article 18)
ImpedingFair
Competition(Article 19)
塑膠製品製造業 15 - - - - - Manufacture of Plastics Products 非金屬礦物製品製造業 21 - - 13 3 1 Manufacture of Other Non-metallic Mineral Products 基本金屬製造業 3 - - 1 - 1 Manufacture of Basic Metals 金屬製品製造業 17 - - - 1 1 Manufacture of Fabricated Metal Products 電子零組件製造業 10 - 1 - 1 - Manufacture of Electronic Parts and Components 電腦、電子產品及光學製品製造業 72 4 1 7 5 3 Manufacture of Computers, Electronic and Optical Products 電力設備製造業 30 - - - 4 1 Manufacture of Electrical Equipment 機械設備製造業 24 - - - - - Manufacture of Machinery and Equipment 汽車及其零件製造業 29 - - - - - Manufacture of Motor Vehicles and Parts 其他運輸工具及其零件製造業 9 - - 1 2 3 Manufacture of Other Transport Equipment and Parts 家具製造業 10 - - - - - Manufacture of Furniture 其他製造業 68 - - 1 - - Other Manufacturing 產業用機械設備維修及安裝業 4 - - 1 - 1 Repair and Installation of Industrial Machinery and Equipment電力及燃氣供應業 33 1 1 15 - 6Electricity and Gas Supply
用水供應及污染整治業 10 - - 5 - 2 Water Supply and Remediation Services 用水供應業 - - - - - - Water Supply 廢(污)水處理業 - - - - - - Wastewater (Sewage) Treatment 廢棄物清除、處理及資源回收處理業 10 - - 5 - 2 Waste Collection, Treatment and Disposal Activities; Materials Recovery 污染整治業 - - - - - - Remediation Activities and Other Waste Management Services營造業 Construction 82 - 1 9 - 1 建築工程業 4 - 1 - - - Construction of Buildings 土木工程業 52 - - 3 - 1 Civil Engineering 專門營造業 26 - - 6 - - Specialized Construction Activities
表 18 處分案件統計-按違法行為別及行業別分 (續1)
截至中華民國103年底止
-106-
行業別處分書
件數
違反公平交易法
Unit:Case
仿冒他人
商品或服務
表徵行為
(第20條)
虛偽不實
或引人錯誤
廣告行為
(第21條)
損害他人
營業信譽行
為
(第22條)
非法多層次
傳銷行為
(第23條、第
23條之1~之4)
欺罔或
顯失公平
行為
(第24條)
其 他(第41條後段、第
42條第2項、
第43條)
CounterfeitingSymbols of
Goods/Services(Article 20)
False, Untrue orMisleading
Advertisement(Article 21)
Damage toBusiness
Reputation(Article 22)
Improper Multi-level Sales
(Articles 23 & 23-1~23-4)
Deceptive orObviously
Unfair Conducts(Article 24)
Others(2nd Part of Article
41、Para.2 ofArticle 42、Article
43)
- 2 - - 13 - - -
- 1 - - 3 - - -
- - - - 1 - - -
- 5 1 - 10 - - -
- 4 - - 4 - - -
- 24 - - 34 1 - -
- 17 - - 8 - - -
- 12 2 - 9 2 - -
- 22 - - 7 1 - -
- 3 - - 2 - - -
- 5 - - 4 2 - -
- 23 - - 44 - - -
- 1 - - 1 - - -
- 1 - - 9 - - -
- - 1 - 2 - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - 1 - 2 - - -
- - - - - - - -
- 9 - - 64 - - -- 2 - - 1 - - -
- 2 - - 47 - - -
- 5 - - 16 - - -
違反多
層次傳
銷管理
法行為Violation ofthe Multi-
LevelMarketing
SupervisionAct
Table 18 Cases of Decision-by Illegal Practices and Industry (Cont.1)
By the End of 2014
-107-
違 反個資法
行 為Violation of
thePersonal
InformationProtection
Act
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
單位:件
獨占行為
(第10條)
結合行為
(第11條)
聯合行為
(第14條)
約定轉售
價 格
(第18條)
妨礙公平
競爭行為
(第19條)
Industry DecisionStatements
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
ConcertedActions
(Article 14)
Resale PriceMaintenance(Article 18)
ImpedingFair
Competition(Article 19)
批發及零售業 Wholesale and Retail Trade 1 850 - 3 21 28 29
批發業 393 - 1 5 17 11 Wholesale Trade 零售業 644 - 2 16 5 17 Retail Trade 其他無店面零售業 813 - - - 6 1 Retail Trade not in Stores or Stalls
運輸及倉儲業 Transportation and Storage 44 2 3 14 - 4
陸上運輸業 15 - 3 4 - 1 Land Transportation 水上運輸業 7 - - 5 - - Water Transportation 航空運輸業 8 - - 3 - 2 Air Transport 運輸輔助業 6 2 - 2 - - Support Activities for Transportation 倉儲業 1 - - - - 1 Warehousing and Storage 郵政及快遞業 7 - - - - - Postal and Courier Activities
住宿及餐飲業 79 - - - - 2Accommodation and Food Service Activities 住宿服務業 12 - - - - - Accommodation 餐飲業 67 - - - - 2 Food and Beverage Service Activities
資訊及通訊傳播業 301 1 37 10 4 35Information and Communication 出版業 36 - - 1 4 5 Publishing Activities 影片服務、聲音錄製及音樂出版業 63 - 7 2 - 18 Motion Picture, Video and Television Programme Production, Sound Recording and Music Publishing Activities 傳播及節目播送業 66 - 24 7 - 7 Programming and Broadcasting Activities 電信業 41 - 5 - - 1 Telecommunications 電腦系統設計服務業 34 - - - - 2 Computer Systems Design Services 資料處理及資訊供應服務業 61 1 1 - - 2 Information Service Activities
金融及保險業 Financial and Insurance Activities 112 1 4 4 - 1
表 18 處分案件統計-按違法行為別及行業別分 (續2)
截至中華民國103年底止
-108-
行業別處分書
件數
違反公平交易法
Unit:Case
仿冒他人
商品或服務
表徵行為
(第20條)
虛偽不實
或引人錯誤
廣告行為
(第21條)
損害他人
營業信譽行
為
(第22條)
非法多層次
傳銷行為
(第23條、第
23條之1~之4)
欺罔或
顯失公平
行為
(第24條)
其 他(第41條後段、第
42條第2項、
第43條)
CounterfeitingSymbols of
Goods/Services(Article 20)
False, Untrue orMisleading
Advertisement(Article 21)
Damage toBusiness
Reputation(Article 22)
Improper Multi-level Sales
(Articles 23 & 23-1~23-4)
Deceptive orObviously
Unfair Conducts(Article 24)
Others(2nd Part of Article
41、Para.2 ofArticle 42、Article
43)
11 761 5 613 349 66 23 -
3 220 3 12 123 20 - -
8 366 2 - 208 35 - -
- 175 - 601 18 11 23 -
- 11 - - 11 4 - -
- 5 - - 2 - - -
- 2 - - - - - -
- 2 - - 3 - - -
- - - - 2 - - -
- - - - 1 - - -
- 2 - - 3 4 - -
1 45 - - 33 2 - -
- 11 - - 1 - - -
1 34 - - 32 2 - -
3 130 3 2 83 8 - -
2 10 1 1 15 - - -
1 18 - - 14 5 - -
- 15 2 - 12 - - -
- 25 - 1 10 1 - -
- 17 - - 15 2 - -
- 45 - - 17 - - -
1 37 - - 64 - - -
-109-
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
Table 18 Cases of Decision-by Illegal Practices and Industry (Cont.2)
By the End of 2014
違反多
層次傳
銷管理
法行為Violation ofthe Multi-
LevelMarketing
SupervisionAct
違 反個資法
行 為Violation of
thePersonal
InformationProtection
Act
單位:件
獨占行為
(第10條)
結合行為
(第11條)
聯合行為
(第14條)
約定轉售
價 格
(第18條)
妨礙公平
競爭行為
(第19條)
Industry DecisionStatements
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
ConcertedActions
(Article 14)
Resale PriceMaintenance(Article 18)
ImpedingFair
Competition(Article 19)
金融中介業 79 - 2 1 - - Financial Intermediation 保險業 25 - 1 1 - - Insurance 證券期貨及其他金融業 8 1 1 2 - 1 Securities, Futures and Other Financing
不動產業 Real Estate Activities 639 - - - - -
不動產開發業 506 - - - - - Real Estate Development Activities 不動產經營及相關服務業 133 - - - - - Real Estate Operation and Related Activities
專業、科學及技術服務業 71 - - 10 - 2Professional, Scientific and Technical Activities 法律及會計服務業 10 - - 7 - - Legal and Accounting Activities 企業總管理機構及管理顧問業 21 - - - - 1 Activities of Head Offices; Management Consultancy Activities 建築、工程服務及技術檢測、分析服務業 20 - - 1 - - Architecture and Engineering Activities; Technical Testing and Analysis 研究發展服務業 - - - - - - Scientific Research and Development 廣告業及市場研究業 8 - - - - 1 Advertising and Market Research 專門設計服務業 1 - - - - - Specialized Design Activities 獸醫服務業 - - - - - - Veterinary Activities 其他專業、科學及技術服務業 11 - - 2 - - Other Professional, Scientific and Technical Activities
支援服務業 Support Service Activities 79 - - 1 - 1
租賃業 6 - - 1 - - Rental and Leasing Activities 人力仲介及供應業 4 - - - - 1 Employment Activities 旅行及相關代訂服務業 6 - - - - - Travel agency, Tour Operator, Reservation Service and Related Activities 保全及私家偵探服務業 6 - - - - - Security and Investigation Activities 建築物及綠化服務業 1 - - - - - Services to Buildings and Landscape Activities 業務及辦公室支援服務業 56 - - - - - Business and Office Support Activities
表 18 處分案件統計-按違法行為別及行業別分 (續3)
截至中華民國103年底止
-110-
行業別處分書
件數
違反公平交易法
Unit:Case
仿冒他人
商品或服務
表徵行為
(第20條)
虛偽不實
或引人錯誤
廣告行為
(第21條)
損害他人
營業信譽行
為
(第22條)
非法多層次
傳銷行為
(第23條、第
23條之1~之4)
欺罔或
顯失公平
行為
(第24條)
其 他(第41條後段、第
42條第2項、
第43條)
CounterfeitingSymbols of
Goods/Services(Article 20)
False, Untrue orMisleading
Advertisement(Article 21)
Damage toBusiness
Reputation(Article 22)
Improper Multi-level Sales
(Articles 23 & 23-1~23-4)
Deceptive orObviously
Unfair Conducts(Article 24)
Others(2nd Part of Article
41、Para.2 ofArticle 42、Article
43)
- 34 - - 42 - - -
- 1 - - 22 - - -
1 2 - - - - - -
- 531 - - 115 6 - -
- 452 - - 60 5 - -
- 79 - - 55 1 - -
1 30 2 1 24 1 - -
- 2 - - - 1 - -
1 14 1 1 3 - - -
- - - - 19 - - -
- - - - - - - -
- 5 1 - 1 - - -
- 1 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- 8 - - 1 - - -
3 56 - - 21 5 - -
- 4 - - 1 - - -
- 3 - - - 1 - -
- 3 - - 3 2 - -
- 5 - - 2 - - -
- - - - 1 - - -
3 41 - - 14 2 - -
-111-
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
Table 18 Cases of Decision-by Illegal Practices and Industry (Cont.3)
By the End of 2014
違反多
層次傳
銷管理
法行為Violation ofthe Multi-
LevelMarketing
SupervisionAct
違 反個資法
行 為Violation of
thePersonal
InformationProtection
Act
單位:件
獨占行為
(第10條)
結合行為
(第11條)
聯合行為
(第14條)
約定轉售
價 格
(第18條)
妨礙公平
競爭行為
(第19條)
Industry DecisionStatements
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
ConcertedActions
(Article 14)
Resale PriceMaintenance(Article 18)
ImpedingFair
Competition(Article 19)
公共行政及國防;強制性社會安全 24 - - 1 - 10Public Administration and Defence; Compulsory Social Security 公共行政及國防;強制性社會安全 24 - - 1 - 10 Public Administration and Defence; Compulsory Social Security 國際組織及外國機構 - - - - - - Activities of Extraterritorial Organizations and Bodies
教育服務業 Education 46 - - 4 - 1
醫療保健及社會工作服務業 12 - - 1 - -Human Health and Social Work Activities 醫療保健服務業 12 - - 1 - - Human Health Activities 居住照顧服務業 - - - - - - Residential Care Activities 其他社會工作服務業 - - - - - - Social Work Activities without Accommodation
藝術、娛樂及休閒服務業 36 - 4 4 - 2Arts, Entertainment and Recreation 創作及藝術表演業 4 - - 2 - - Creative, Arts and Entertainment Activities 圖書館、檔案保存、博物館及類似機構 - - - - - - Libraries, Archives, Museums and Other Cultural Activities 博弈業 2 - - - - - Gambling and Betting Activities 運動、娛樂及休閒服務業 30 - 4 2 - 2 Sports Activities and Amusement and Recreation Activities
其他服務業 Other Service Activities 186 1 - 52 1 15
宗教、職業及類似組織 76 1 - 48 1 15 Activities of Membership Organizations 個人及家庭用品維修業 36 - - 2 - - Maintenance and Repair of Personal and Household Goods 未分類其他服務業 74 - - 2 - - Other Personal Service Activities
其他不能歸類之行業或個人 Others 68 - - - - 2
表 18 處分案件統計-按違法行為別及行業別分 (續4完)
截至中華民國103年底止
-112-
行業別處分書
件數
違反公平交易法
Unit:Case
仿冒他人
商品或服務
表徵行為
(第20條)
虛偽不實
或引人錯誤
廣告行為
(第21條)
損害他人
營業信譽行
為
(第22條)
非法多層次
傳銷行為
(第23條、第
23條之1~之4)
欺罔或
顯失公平
行為
(第24條)
其 他(第41條後段、第
42條第2項、
第43條)
CounterfeitingSymbols of
Goods/Services(Article 20)
False, Untrue orMisleading
Advertisement(Article 21)
Damage toBusiness
Reputation(Article 22)
Improper Multi-level Sales
(Articles 23 & 23-1~23-4)
Deceptive orObviously
Unfair Conducts(Article 24)
Others(2nd Part of Article
41、Para.2 ofArticle 42、Article
43)
- 2 - - 10 2 - -
- 2 - - 10 2 - -
- - - - - - - -
- 29 2 - 12 1 - -
- 5 - - 8 - - -
- 5 - - 8 - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- 16 2 - 9 - - -
- - - - 2 - - -
- - - - - - - -
- 2 - - - - - -
- 14 2 - 7 - - -
1 86 - 2 28 4 - -
- 8 - 1 2 - - -
1 25 - - 9 1 - -
- 53 - 1 17 3 - -
- 20 - 7 34 5 - -
-113-
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
Table 18 Cases of Decision-by Illegal Practices and Industry (Cont.4)
By the End of 2014
違反多
層次傳
銷管理
法行為Violation ofthe Multi-
LevelMarketing
SupervisionAct
違 反個資法
行 為Violation of
thePersonal
InformationProtection
Act
-114-
(Penalty & Illegal Practice Decision 13 ) 42 31 32
Statements (FTAArticle 13)
(FTAArticle 42)
(MLMSAArticle 31~32 )
Total 4 178 1 6 -
Anti-competitive Practice( 10 ) 17 - - -
Monopolies (FTA Article 10)( 11 ) 57 1 - -
Mergers (FTA Article 11)( 14 ) 192 - - -
Concerted Actions (FTA Article 14)( 18 ) 62 - - -
Resale Price Maintenance (FTA Article 18)( 19 ) 140 - - -
Impeding Fair Competition (FTA Article 19)
Unfair Trade Practice( 20 ) 34 - - -
Counterfeiting Symbols of Goods/Services (FTA Article 20)( 21 ) 1 938 - - -
False, Untrue or Misleading Advertisement (FTA Article 21)( 22 ) 20 - - -
Damage to Business Reputation (FTA Article 22)( 24 ) 1 097 - - -
Deceptive or Obviously Unfair Conducts (FTA Article 24)
( 23 23 1~4) 625 - 6 -Improper Multi-level Sales (FTA Article 23 & 23-1~23-4)
( 43 ) 27 - - -Refusing Investigation or Provision of Data withoutJustification (FTA Article 43)
( 41 86 - - -42 2 )
Failure to Cease or Rectify Illegal Conduct after the Prescribed Time (FTA 2nd Part of Article 41 & Para.2 of Article 42 )
23 - - -Violation of the Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act
- - - -Violation of the Personal Information Protection Act
1. 2. 103 1 29 3. ( ) 101 10 1
Operation SuspendedMergerProhibitted
103
-115-
Unit Case
42 31 32 32 34 47 48(FTA
Article 42)(MLMSA
Article 31~32 )13
(Article 13)41
(Article 41)42
(Article 42)(MLMSA
Article 32~34) (PIPA Article 47~48)
20 - 35 3 303 290 8 -
- - - 13 - - -
- - 35 - - - -
- - - 186 - - -
- - - 60 - - -
- - - 137 - - -
- - - 34 - - -
- - - 1 726 - - -
- - - 20 - - -
- - - 1 085 - - -
20 - - 61 289 - -
- - - - - - -
- - - 83 2 - -
- - - - - 8 -
- - - - - - -
Note 1.Sum of illegal practice or penalty may exceed the total case of decision. Subject to a case may involve more than one illegal practice of penalty.
2.The Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act (the MLMSA) was promulgated and enacted on January 29, 2014. 3.The Personal Information Protection Act (the PIPA) was enacted on October 1, 2012. The FTC is the competent authority of applying the said Act on the multi-level sales businesses.
Ordered toClose Business
By the End of 2014
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
Order to Cease or Rectify Illegal Conduct
Table 19 Decisions for Imposing Penalty by Illegal Practices
-116-
Penalty & Illegal Practice ( 25 )(PIPA Article 25) (PIPA Article 50)
Total - -
Anti-competitive Practice( 10 ) - -
Monopolies (FTA Article 10)( 11 ) - -
Mergers (FTA Article 11)( 14 ) - -
Concerted Actions (FTA Article 14)( 18 ) - -
Resale Price Maintenance (FTA Article 18)( 19 ) - -
Impeding Fair Competition (FTA Article 19)
Unfair Trade Practice( 20 ) - -
Counterfeiting Symbols of Goods/Services (FTA Article 20)( 21 ) - -
False, Untrue or Misleading Advertisement (FTA Article 21)( 22 ) - -
Damage to Business Reputation (FTA Article 22)( 24 ) - -
Deceptive or Obviously Unfair Conducts (FTA Article 24)
( 23 23 1~4) - -Improper Multi-level Sales (FTA Article 23 & 23-1~23-4)
( 43 ) - -Refusing Investigation or Provision of Data withoutJustification (FTA Article 43)
( 41 - -42 2 )
Failure to Cease or Rectify Illegal Conduct after the Prescribed Time (FTA 2nd Part of Article 41 & Para.2 of Article 42 )
- -Violation of the Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act
- -Violation of the Personal Information Protection Act
103
Forbiding Collecting & Processing,Demanding the Deletion, Confiscating
or Destroying, Publicizing the ViolationCase
Liability of theRepresentative
( 50 )
-117-
Unit Case
40 41 42 42 43 32 35 47 49
FTAArticle 40
FTAArticle 41
FTA PreviousArticle 42
FTA CurrentArticle 42
FTAArticle 43
MLMSAArticle 32~35
PIPAArticle 47~49
59 2 039 113 480 27 23 -
- 11 - - - - -
59 - - - - - -
- 126 - - - - -
- 36 - - - - -
- 63 - - - - -
- 16 - - - - -
- 1 151 - - - - -
- 10 - - - - -
- 572 - - - - -
- 30 113 479 - - -
- - - - 27 - -
- 82 - 2 - - -
- - - - - 23 -
- - - - - - -
Table 19 Decisions for Imposing Penalty by Illegal Practices(Cont.)
By the End of 2014
Fined
-118-
( 10 ) ( 11 ) ( 14 ) ( 18 ) ( 19 )
Year & Month BusinessFirms Subject
to Decision
Anti-competitive
Practice
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
ConcertedActions
(Article 14)
Resale PriceMaintenance(Article 18)
Impeding FairCompetition(Article 19)
Total 6 122 1 645 20 105 1 301 62 172 81 1992 76 28 - - 14 10 8 82 1993 105 22 - 7 - 3 12 83 1994 220 64 - 1 59 1 3 84 1995 285 99 - - 80 2 19 85 1996 227 38 - 4 18 4 12 86 1997 280 44 - 3 31 2 8 87 1998 291 44 - 4 31 2 8 88 1999 271 86 - 13 64 - 9 89 2000 564 231 2 4 212 1 12 90 2001 358 115 3 2 110 - 3 91 2002 302 52 6 16 29 1 3 92 2003 260 63 - 1 50 2 10 93 2004 160 31 - 6 21 - 4 94 2005 222 62 1 - 57 2 2 95 2006 227 55 - 3 44 3 5 96 2007 242 49 - 5 40 3 1 97 2008 239 41 - 7 17 - 17 98 2009 338 126 3 5 113 3 2 99 2010 216 49 - 2 41 - 6100 2011 356 55 - 1 43 1 11101 2012 355 142 - 1 132 4 6102 2013 321 81 3 8 57 10 3103 2014 207 68 2 12 38 8 8 1 Jan. 17 2 - - 1 1 - 2 Feb. 16 6 - - - 2 4 3 Mar. 11 - - - - - - 4 Apr. 39 31 1 2 23 3 2 5 May 16 2 1 - - - 1 6 June 21 8 - 7 - - 1 7 July 20 9 - - 9 - - 8 Aug. 11 3 - 3 - - - 9 Sept. 16 4 - - 4 - - 10 Oct. 13 - - - - - - 11 Nov. 13 3 - - 1 2 - 12 Dec. 14 - - - - - -
2 3. 103 1 29
81 - 103
-119-
Unit Firm
( 20 ) ( 21 ) ( 22 ) ( 24 )
UnfairTrade
Practice
CounterfeitingSymbols of
Goods/Services(Article 20)
False, Untrueor MisleadingAdvertisement
(Article 21)
Damage toBusiness
Reputation(Article 22)
Deceptive orObviously
UnfairConducts
(Article 24)
Improper Multi-level Sales
(Article 23 & 23-1 23-4)
Others(2nd Part of Article
41 Para.2 ofArticle 42 Article
43)
3 733 34 2 301 22 1 461 667 115 23 - 46 1 44 - 1 5 - - - 67 - 57 - 13 11 7 - -
133 - 84 4 55 16 8 - - 164 3 120 1 44 16 7 - - 178 1 112 1 66 5 8 - - 205 2 117 3 88 23 13 - - 207 7 108 1 93 27 23 - - 169 - 71 1 101 15 3 - - 324 5 81 1 240 24 1 - - 200 5 57 - 142 38 6 - - 174 1 62 - 112 75 1 - - 165 2 49 - 117 32 5 - -
89 2 55 1 33 38 4 - - 106 2 82 - 28 51 3 - - 155 - 111 2 47 18 - - - 160 1 111 - 50 30 6 - - 162 1 132 - 33 32 4 - - 194 1 166 5 29 18 1 - - 142 - 112 - 32 22 3 - - 228 - 197 - 37 69 6 - - 167 - 141 1 27 46 2 - - 187 - 142 1 46 51 3 - - 111 - 90 - 27 5 1 23 -
11 - 9 - 3 5 - - - 10 - 10 - - - - - - 10 - 7 - 5 - - 1 -
6 - 5 - 1 - 1 1 - 9 - 7 - 2 - - 5 - 9 - 6 - 4 - - 4 - 9 - 6 - 4 - - 2 - 5 - 3 - 2 - - 3 -
12 - 12 - - - - - - 12 - 10 - 2 - - 1 -
6 - 6 - 1 - - 4 - 12 - 9 - 3 - - 2 -
decision ruling because one business firm may involve more than one illegal practice. 3.The Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act was promulgated and enacted on January 29, 2014.
Table 20 Business Firms Subject to Decision by Illegal Practices
1992 - 2014
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
( 2323 1
4)
( 4142 2
43 )Violation ofthe Multi-
LevelMarketing
SupervisionAct
Notes 1.The number of business firms includes complaints and FTC self-initiated investigation. 2.The number of business firms under each category of illegal practices may exceed total business firms subject to
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
4.The Personal Information Protection Act was enacted on October 1, 2012. The FTC is the competent authority of
119
Violation ofthe PersonalInformationProtection
Act
applying the said Act on the multi-level sales businesses.
-120-
( 10 ) ( 11 ) ( 14 ) ( 18 ) ( 19 )
YearFines Subjectto Decision
Anti-competitive
Practice
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
ConcertedActions
(Article 14)
Resale PriceMaintenance(Article 18)
Impeding FairCompetition(Article 19)
Total 2 197 303 2 039 098 5 930 10 747 2 000 546 3 646 18 229
81 1992 170 - - - - - - 82 1993 640 350 - 350 - - - 83 1994 510 10 - 10 - - - 84 1995 705 - - - - - - 85 1996 595 130 - 130 - - -
86 1997 1 035 30 - 30 - - - 87 1998 1 622 320 320 - - - 88 1999 4 937 3 260 1 090 2 080 - 90 89 2000 15 656 11 075 1 000 520 8 765 50 740 90 2001 28 908 17 060 1 400 40 15 530 - 90
91 2002 25 375 3 870 2 200 300 1 040 20 310 92 2003 46 965 36 625 - 350 35 260 5 1 010 93 2004 7 072 2 720 - 290 1 950 - 480 94 2005 34 525 26 397 150 - 24 702 15 1 530 95 2006 23 104 8 287 - 142 7 470 156 519
96 2007 23 979 5 269 - 1 355 3 064 750 100 97 2008 30 325 12 745 - 2 820 1 440 - 8 485 98 2009 20 198 11 960 500 570 10 610 20 260 99 2010 6 584 2 798 - 450 1 868 - 480100 2011 23 311 10 405 - 10 7 350 100 2 945
101 2012 36 662 30 778 - 90 29 346 280 1 062102 2013 1 250 369 1 244 496 500 595 1 243 271 90 40103 2014 614 056 610 513 180 1 285 606 800 2 160 88
12.
3. 103 1 29 4.
6.102 125 963.2 60.5 103 60 700
81 - 103
5.100 11 23 41
-121-
Unit NTD10,000
( 20 ) ( 21 ) ( 22 ) ( 24 )
UnfairTrade
Practice
CounterfeitingSymbols of
Goods/Services(Article 20)
False, Untrueor MisleadingAdvertisement
(Article 21)
Damage toBusiness
Reputation(Article 22)
Deceptive orObviously
UnfairConducts
(Article 24)
Improper Multi-level Sales
(Article 23 & 23-1 23-4)
Others(2nd Part of Article
41 Para.2 ofArticle 42Article 43)
106 480 923 60 785 286 44 486 41 549 9 766 410 -
- - - - - 170 - - -- - - - - 160 130 - -- - - - - 240 260 - -- - - - - 470 235 - -- - - - - 95 370 - --- - - - - 565 440 - -- - - - - 420 882 - -
1 132 - 615 - 517 455 90 - -3 586 150 820 20 2 596 895 100 - -7 371 180 725 - 6 466 4 310 167 - -
-3 365 - 1 625 - 1 740 18 130 10 - -2 070 20 515 - 1 535 3 190 5 080 - -1 515 - 840 10 665 2 240 597 - -4 848 18 3 442 - 1 388 3 215 65 - -
14 117 - 6 123 121 7 873 700 - - --
16 183 50 9 453 - 6 680 1 677 850 - -16 514 500 13 662 - 2 352 1 031 35 - -
7 858 5 7 273 65 515 330 50 - -3 291 - 2 431 - 860 270 225 - -
11 910 - 4 890 - 7 020 926 70 - -
4 664 - 3 848 60 756 1 205 15 - - 4 958 - 2 445 10 2 503 820 95 - - 3 098 - 2 078 - 1 020 35 - 410 -
Notes 1.The number of business firms includes complaints and FTC self-initiated investigation. 2.The number of business firms under each category of illegal practices may exceed total business firms subject to
decision ruling because one business firm may involve more than one illegal practice. 3.The Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act was promulgated and enacted on January 29, 2014.
4.The Personal Information Protection Act was enacted on October 1, 2012. The FTC is the competent authority of applying the said Act on the multi-level sales businesses.
6.The fines in 2013 totaled NT$ 12,500 million. Among them, the fine for 9 independent power producers that jointly refused to re-negotiate the terms of the purchase agreements with the Taiwan Power Company were NT$ 6,320 million, and later on were readjusted to NT$ 6,050 due to decision of appeal. The said fine for those power producers were then readjusted once again in 2014 to NT$ 6,007 million due to another million decision of appeal.
Table 21 Fines Subject to Decision by Illegal Practices
1992 - 2014
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
( 2323 1
4)
( 4142 2
43 )
Violation ofthe Multi-
LevelMarketing
SupervisionAct
5.The Article 41 of the Fair Trade Act was amended on 23rd November, 2011 to raise the ceiling of the administrative fines for certain illegal practices stipulated.
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
Violation ofthe
PersonalInformationProtection
Act
121
-122-
Unit Case Firm NTD10,000
Cases Firms Cases Firms Fine
Total 4 036 5 848 2 598 3 732 893 476
81 1992 63 75 4 5 170
82 1993 90 100 16 18 375
83 1994 156 218 23 23 460
84 1995 177 283 21 21 690
85 1996 196 216 17 17 585
86 1997 222 267 26 28 735
87 1998 241 278 45 45 1 047
88 1999 162 263 50 74 4 722
89 2000 218 553 136 274 13 481
90 2001 203 302 150 210 24 778
91 2002 207 287 172 229 23 530
92 2003 180 248 132 188 46 767
93 2004 131 156 110 133 5 612
94 2005 135 215 134 214 32 365
95 2006 171 223 170 222 22 179
96 2007 176 230 176 230 18 029
97 2008 159 216 154 206 19 747
98 2009 179 331 158 294 11 932
99 2010 154 215 139 194 6 534
100 2011 266 347 239 316 18 061
101 2012 191 314 178 299 14 622
102 2013 211 306 203 290 13 209
103 2014 148 205 145 202 613 846
Note Decisions affirmed include decisions under appeal.
Decision Statement Fines and Cases of Decision Statements
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
By the End of 2014
Table 22 Decisions Affirmed and Fines and Cases of Decision Statements
103
Date ofOriginalDecision
Appeals
-124-
Case Received
(%)Case Appealed
Ratio
Total 10 426 12 370 802 18.73 406
Sub-total 3 715 4 283 802 18.73 406
81 1992 164 176 19 10.80 1282 1993 292 304 40 13.16 1883 1994 463 526 78 14.83 4484 1995 459 565 97 17.17 4285 1996 530 552 112 20.29 56
86 1997 548 595 148 24.87 9087 1998 531 569 133 23.37 7288 1999 451 552 113 20.47 6689 1-6 Jan.-June 277 444 62 13.96 6
Sub-total 6 711 8 087 - - -
89 7-12 July-Dec. 250 421 - - -90 2001 464 610 - - -
91 2002 436 520 - - -92 2003 382 455 - - -93 2004 311 336 - - -94 2005 366 447 - - -95 2006 565 617 - - -
96 2007 526 584 - - -97 2008 522 592 - - -98 2009 535 690 - - -99 2010 446 507 - - -
100 2011 550 634 - - -
101 2012 519 671 - - - 102 2013 490 597 - - - 103 2014 349 406 - - -
1. 89.7.1 89.7.12. 3.
4.
Appeal Committee
Appeal Committee,Fair Trade Commission
AppealCommittee,
Executive Yuan
Date ofOriginal Decision
89.7.1 Before July 1, 2000
Number ofCases
103
Number ofEnterprisesDisposed
-125-
Unit Case Firm
(%)
Adminstrative Court Case Received Case Appealed Ratio AdministrativeLitigation Court,
District Court
HightAdministrative
Court
SupremeAdministrative
Court
192 2 014 24.90 9 766 388
192 - - - 32 17
5 - - - - - 11 - - - - - 25 - - - - - 22 - - - 1 - 28 - - - - -
54 - - - - - 38 - - - 3 2
9 - - - 28 15- - - - - -
- 2 014 24.90 9 734 371
- 150 35.63 - 69 30- 231 37.87 - 88 45
- 163 31.35 - 69 29- 165 36.26 - 62 33- 73 21.73 - 27 10- 109 24.38 - 53 38- 168 27.23 - 71 36
- 139 23.80 - 51 28- 141 23.82 - 42 23- 174 25.22 - 62 32- 87 17.16 - 27 11- 89 14.04 - 28 21
- 148 22.06 4 45 18- 97 16.25 3 20 16- 80 19.70 2 20 1
Note 1. Before July 1, 2000 and After July 1,2000 indicate different time periods when Appeal Act and Administrative proceedings Act apply.
2.Number of firms subject to administrative decisions includes that of decisions and no-action decisions. Cases received means appeal cases and administrative proceedings cases against decisions decisions and no-action decisions. Case number of every stage calculates
only the first reception. 3.A decision may apply to more than one enterprise or individual. And any enerprise or individual concerned may apply for
administrative remedy. Number of enterprises disposed therefore reresented number of administrative remedy. 4.Number of administrative remedy included number of appeals and administrative proceedings without appeals.Source Dept. of Legal Affairs of the Fair Trade Commission.
Administrative Proceedings
89.7.1 After July 1, 2000
Appeal Committee, Executive Yuan
125
AdministrativeProceedings
Administrative Decisions
Table 23 Appeals and Administrative Proceedings
By the End of 2014
-126-
Unit Case
Year &Month
Total IncompleteProcedure
SubstantiveCause
OriginalDecisionRepealed
OriginalDecisionPartiallyRepealed
Withdrawn Others
Total 802 55 679 29 12 18 9
81 1992 2 - 2 - - - -
82 1993 38 5 29 - - 2 2
83 1994 63 5 53 4 - - 1
84 1995 58 2 47 1 1 6 1
85 1996 128 5 111 4 3 3 2
86 1997 153 10 123 11 5 2 2
87 1998 157 10 141 2 2 1 1
88 1999 78 11 61 4 - 2 -
89 2000 125 7 112 3 1 2 -
1 Jan. 12 2 10 - - - -
2 Feb. 29 1 27 1 - - -
3 Mar. 14 - 14 - - - -
4 Apr. 4 - 4 - - - -
5 May 11 1 10 - - - -
6 June 16 3 12 - - 1 -
7 July 9 - 8 - 1 - -
8 Aug. 30 - 27 2 - 1 -
Note Starting from July 2000, the enterprises penalized by the FTC could appeal to the Executive Yuan.Source The Administrative Petition Committee of the Fair Trade Commission.
Case Concluded
Table 24 Results of Appeal
( ) 81 - 89
Rejected
1992-2000
-127-
Unit Case
Year & MonthCarried Over
from PrecedingYear
Received inCurrent Year
OriginalDecisionRepealed
NotAccepted
Total 2 094 94 186 89
7-12 July-Dec. 113 - 3 90 2001 98 260 10 23 91 2002 93 175 5 25 92 2003 57 191 11 14 93 2004 86 80 2 14 94 2005 32 113 2 5 95 2006 43 173 3 9 96 2007 62 154 2 16 97 2008 50 143 14 11 98 2009 44 168 3 12 99 2010 72 101 1 15100 2011 29 83 4 9101 2012 29 155 17 11102 2013 37 100 8 11103 2014 25 85 12 8
Year & Month Withdrawn CasePending
Total 13 20 89
7-12 July-Dec. 1 98 90 2001 - 93 91 2002 - 57 92 2003 3 86 93 2004 3 32 94 2005 2 43 95 2006 - 62 96 2007 - 50 97 2008 - 44 98 2009 2 72 99 2010 - 29100 2011 1 29101 2012 - 37102 2013 1 25103 2014 - 20
Note Appeals received after July 2000 are applicable to Appeal Act enforced on July 1, 2000.Source Dept. of Legal Affairs of the Fair Trade Commission.
- - -
70 90
-
-
-
-
2-
---
-- -
5
-
-
-
-
-
- -
15 1
-
--
9
28 -
2
-
5
Partially Rejected,Partially not
Accepted
Partially Rejected,Original DecisionPartially Repealed
-
2 1
-
15
1 715
Original DecisionPartially Repealed
13 48
1 -
Case Concluded-By Decision of Appeal
2 074
211
112
100 140 123
83 69
Case Received
Total Rejected
2000-2014
166
102
265
147
115
Table 24 Results of Appeal (Cont.)
( ) 89 - 103
-- --
11 231 166
117
147 119
149
-
-
162 134
154
133
81
144
91 142
-128-
10 11 14 18 19
Date ofOriginal Decision
Number ofDecisionsRepealed
Monopolies
(Article 10)
Mergers
(Article 11)
ConcertedActions
(Article 14)
Resale PriceMaintenance(Article 18)
Impeding FairCompetition(Article 19)
Total 168 7 8 30 1 8 81 1992 1 - - - - - 82 1993 4 - 2 - - - 83 1994 2 - - 1 - - 84 1995 4 - - - - - 85 1996 10 - - - - 1 86 1997 12 - - - - 1 87 1998 14 - 4 - - 1 88 1999 8 - - - - - 89 2000 12 - - 3 - - 90 2001 10 1 - 5 - - 91 2002 14 3 - 2 - - 92 2003 9 - - 3 - - 93 2004 6 - - - - - 94 2005 6 - - 1 - - 95 2006 4 - - - - 1 96 2007 8 - - 1 - - 97 2008 12 - 1 1 - 1 98 2009 6 1 1 - - - 99 2010 1 - - 1 - -100 2011 6 - - 4 - 2101 2012 13 - - 6 1 -102 2013 4 1 - 2 - -103 2014 2 1 - - - 1 1 Jan. - - - - - - 2 Feb. - - - - - - 3 Mar. - - - - - - 4 Apr. 1 - - - - 1 5 May 1 1 - - - - 6 June - - - - - - 7 July - - - - - - 8 Aug. - - - - - - 9 Sept. - - - - - - 10 Oct. - - - - - - 11 Nov. - - - - - - 12 Dec. - - - - - -
1.2.
( ) 3. 103 1 29
103
-129-
Unit Case
20 21 22
2323 1
4 24
4142 2
43
CounterfeitingSymbols of
Goods/Services(Article 20)
False, Untrue orMisleading
Advertisement(Article 21)
Damage toBusiness
Reputation(Article 22)
Improper Multi-level Sales
(Articles 23 &23-1 23-4)
Deceptive orObviously
UnfairConducts
(Article 24)
Others(2nd Part ofArticle 41
Para.2 of Article 42 Article 43)
1 42 1 9 51 10 - -- 1 - - - - - -- - - - - 1 - -- - - 1 - - - -- 2 - 2 - - - -- 7 - - 1 - - -- 1 1 2 5 3 - -- 2 - - 3 5 - -- 3 - 2 4 - - -
1 3 - - 4 - - -- 1 - 1 3 - - -- 2 - - 7 - - -- 1 - - 5 - - -- 1 - - 3 - - -- 3 - - 2 - - -- 1 - - 2 - - -- 3 - - 4 1 - -- 6 - 1 2 - - -- 2 - - 1 - - -- - - - - - - -- - 2- 3 - - 3 - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
Note 1.Number of decisions repealed includes decisions overruled and decisions partially repealed.2.Number of decisions repealed is not the same with illegal actions due to some cases incolved with
more than one action or decisions repealed for reason other than the actions involved. (e.g. penalties)
Source Service Industry Competition Dept., Manufacturing Industry Competition Dept., Fair Competition Dept., Dept. of Legal Affairs, and Information and Economic Analysis Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
Violation ofthe PersonalInformationProtection
Act
129
4. The Personal Information Protection Act was enacted on October 1, 2012. The FTC is the competent authority of 3.The Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act was promulgated and enacted on January 29, 2014.
Violation of the Fair Trade Act
applying the said Act on the multi-level sales businesses.
Table 25 Decisions Repealed by Type of Illegal Practices
By the end of 2014
Violation ofthe Multi-
LevelMarketing
SupervisionAct
Multi-level Sales
-132-
1992 - 2014 Unit Enterprise
EnterprisesRecordation at End of
Preceding Year
EnterprisesRecordation inCurrent Year
EnterprisesWithdrawing
Recordation inCurrent Year
EnterprisesRecordation at End of
Current Year
Total - 4 473 4 044 -
81 1992 - 243 17 226 82 1993 226 165 39 352 83 1994 352 188 109 431 84 1995 431 284 111 604 85 1996 604 300 146 758
86 1997 758 304 218 844 87 1998 844 240 343 741 88 1999 741 184 281 644 89 2000 644 153 153 644 90 2001 644 223 216 651
91 2002 651 317 239 729 92 2003 729 272 256 745 93 2004 745 230 236 739 94 2005 739 242 246 735 95 2006 735 186 217 704
96 2007 704 164 148 720 97 2008 720 124 448 396 98 2009 396 122 116 402 99 2010 402 98 141 359100 2011 359 146 91 414
101 2012 414 143 143 414102 2013 414 145 130 429103 2014 429 126 141 414
Source Fair Competition Dept. of the Fair Trade Commission.
Table 26 Recordation of Multi-level Sales Enterprises
Year
-133-
Unit Enterprise
Total New TaipeiCity
TaipeiCity
TaoyuanCity
TaichungCity
TainanCity
KaohsiungCity
81 1992 226 7 139 4 29 9 18
82 1993 352 21 198 9 45 12 28
83 1994 431 22 228 14 66 12 40
84 1995 604 34 301 27 99 15 59
85 1996 758 53 355 38 119 19 82
86 1997 844 64 378 40 152 18 88
87 1998 741 67 302 32 139 17 84
88 1999 644 64 259 46 118 10 63
89 2000 644 63 265 48 111 11 72
90 2001 651 66 257 48 123 10 86
91 2002 729 81 277 59 148 12 82
92 2003 745 88 256 58 160 17 90
93 2004 739 80 252 54 171 15 88
94 2005 735 75 252 52 174 16 87
95 2006 704 71 241 51 156 16 83
96 2007 720 76 235 56 161 17 83
97 2008 396 44 164 39 60 10 26
98 2009 402 34 160 39 71 8 34
99 2010 359 28 158 27 66 16 41
100 2011 414 36 165 39 94 15 44
101 2012 414 41 168 36 92 18 38
102 2013 429 35 183 36 93 17 47
103 2014 414 39 182 35 81 15 43
1.97 2.99 ( ) ( ) ( ) 3.103 12 25Note 1.Number of enterprises in Kinmen & Matsu in 2008 and before contains that of enterprises overseas.
Tainan County and the Kaohsiung County respectively.
Source Fair Competition Dept. of the Fair Trade Commission.
Table 27 Recordation of Multi-level Sales Enterprises by Area
End of 1992 - 2014
Year
2.In the end of 2010, there were restructuring of local governments. Then the Taipei County was renamed as the New
3. The Taoyuan County was upgraded as a special municipality Taoyuan City on 25 December, 2014.
Taipei City, the Taichung City, the Tainan City, and the Kaohsiung City were merged with the Taichung County, the
-134-
YilanCounty
HsinchuCounty
MiaoliCounty
ChanghuaCounty
NantouCounty
YunlinCounty
ChiayiCounty
PintungCounty
81 1992 - 1 1 1 2 - - 2
82 1993 1 1 1 2 4 - - 8
83 1994 1 1 - 3 4 1 - 5
84 1995 2 2 1 5 5 1 - 3
85 1996 2 2 2 7 4 3 1 5
86 1997 2 3 5 7 5 5 - 5
87 1998 2 2 3 7 4 5 - 4
88 1999 2 1 3 5 4 4 - 4
89 2000 3 1 2 4 2 4 1 3
90 2001 1 6 1 4 2 3 3 4
91 2002 3 4 2 5 2 3 - 4
92 2003 3 2 2 7 3 3 - 3
93 2004 3 2 1 9 4 4 2 5
94 2005 4 4 2 7 4 4 2 6
95 2006 2 4 3 8 5 4 2 7
96 2007 3 8 3 8 3 3 1 7
97 2008 3 3 2 2 2 1 - 5
98 2009 2 3 2 2 1 2 - 4
99 2010 2 4 2 2 1 3 - 2
100 2011 2 3 2 2 1 2 - 2
101 2012 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 2
102 2013 4 2 2 3 1 1 - 2
103 2014 3 3 4 2 1 1 - 3
Year
-135-
Unit Enterprise
TaitungCounty
HualienCounty
PenghuCounty
KeelungCity
HsinchuCity
ChiayiCity
KinmenCounty &
LienchiangCounty
TaichungCounty
TainanCounty
KaohsiungCounty
- 1 1 - - - - 3 6 2
- 3 1 2 1 1 - 4 8 2
- 3 1 2 4 2 - 9 12 1
- 4 1 3 7 3 - 17 14 1
- 4 1 4 8 11 - 15 22 1
- 4 - 3 8 12 - 14 26 5
- 4 - 5 6 11 - 15 26 6
- 4 - 3 6 10 - 12 23 3
- 3 - 3 6 6 1 8 21 6
- 1 - - 2 5 1 11 12 5
1 4 - - 3 7 1 13 17 1
1 2 - - 5 5 3 16 18 3
1 5 - 1 5 2 2 16 13 4
- 3 - 4 1 2 2 18 13 3
1 6 - 5 3 1 2 16 11 6
2 8 - 4 1 3 2 13 16 7
1 2 - 2 2 1 - 8 11 8
- 3 - 2 4 1 - 10 10 10
- 1 - 2 3 1 - - - -
- 1 - 2 2 2 - - - -
- 2 - 2 2 1 - - - -
- - - 2 1 - - - - -
- - - 1 1 - - - - -
Table 27 Recordation of Multi-level Sales Enterprises by Area (Cont.)
End of 1992 - 2014
-136-
YearTime of
Complying withRegulation
Enterprisesagainst
RegulationsTotal
Failure toDiscloseAdequate
Information toPaticipants
Written ContractInconsistent with
Recordation
Total 834 335 556 45 71
82 1993 71 11 29 7 1
83 1994 106 4 7 2 1
84 1995 88 2 3 1 -
85 1996 69 1 2 1 -
86 1997 25 10 20 2 -
87 1998 51 17 21 - 1
88 1999 45 4 4 1 -
89 2000 31 16 22 1 1
90 2001 20 9 11 2 2
91 2002 32 26 53 5 14
92 2003 31 17 22 1 2
93 2004 26 34 62 5 4
94 2005 39 19 47 1 5
95 2006 38 25 42 - 3
96 2007 31 16 25 - 3
97 2008 40 8 8 1 1
98 2009 15 12 18 - 2
99 2010 17 14 28 1 7
100 2011 12 26 48 10 6
101 2012 16 22 35 3 3
102 2013 16 27 32 1 4
103 2014 15 15 17 - 11
2. 103 1 29
82 - 103
-137-
Unit Enterprise
( )
Procedure forReturning
Products againstRegulations
Failure to DisplayRelevant
Documents atPlace of Business
Operation withoutReporting in
Advance
Changes ofPracticing without
Reporting in Advance
Operation withoutReporting in
Compliance withTransition Article
Others
92 58 48 133 7 102
7 6 6 1 - 1
3 1 - - - -
- - 1 - - 1
1 - - - - -
4 1 4 4 - 5
5 1 3 10 - 1
1 - 1 - 1 -
3 - 5 5 6 1
2 2 2 - - 1
10 2 9 6 - 7
6 3 2 4 - 4
16 2 4 10 - 21
8 4 2 11 - 16
7 1 - 11 - 20
2 2 1 5 - 12
- 2 1 1 - 2
2 2 1 7 - 4
2 6 2 8 - 2
7 11 2 12 - -
3 4 1 19 - 2
2 4 1 19 - 1
1 4 - - - 1
Notes 1. Figures adding up may exceed the total because an enterprise may commit more than one irregularity. 2.The Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act was promulgated and enacted on January 29, 2014.Source Fair Competition Dept. of the Fair Trade Commission.
Table 28 Inspection of Multi-level Sales Enterprises
1993 - 2014
Causes for Violation
-138-
Year
Total 119 60 42 2 1 37 35 81 1992 4 3 1 1 1 3 4 82 1993 11 6 1 1 - 7 7 83 1994 15 9 2 - - 6 5 84 1995 16 12 4 - - 6 9 85 1996 5 3 - - - 1 2 86 1997 17 7 6 - - 9 1 87 1998 27 11 15 - - 1 4 88 1999 15 5 8 - - 3 2 89 2000 8 4 4 - - - - 90 2001 1 - 1 - - 1 1
Year
Total 476 138 243 4 15 150 44 38 89 2000 21 5 6 - 6 4 2 - 90 2001 31 15 11 1 3 8 - 1 91 2002 50 25 19 2 - 21 7 2 92 2003 29 14 9 - 3 17 2 3 93 2004 36 6 21 1 - 15 2 6 94 2005 34 8 21 - - 15 8 6 95 2006 16 6 6 - - 4 6 7 96 2007 26 4 11 - 1 10 4 4 97 2008 31 3 14 - - 8 1 2 98 2009 15 5 6 - - 3 3 3 99 2010 18 5 9 - - 4 - -100 2011 68 19 44 - - 22 6 3101 2012 45 13 25 - 2 15 2 -102 2013 51 8 38 - - 4 1 1103 2014 5 2 3 - - - - -
6 14
Year Article 6
Article14
103 2014 23 4 1 2 -
12
3. 103 1 29
14 - - 1 -
Article 7
Article 9
Article10
Article 11
Article 12
Article13
Article 15
13 15( )
Decision
7 9 10 11 12
Article 14Article 5 Article 7 Article 8 Article 11 Article 13 Article 13
1413
Decision
8 11 12
1Para. 1
2Para. 2
3Para. 3
4Para. 4
1Para. 1
2Para. 2Decisions
3 Article 3 4
( )81 - 103
-139-
Unit Case
4 2 49 12 7 4 1 1 - 4 2 1 - - 1 - 7 5 - - - 1 1 5 2 4 1 -- 1 10 - 1 1 -- - 2 - - - -- - 9 1 - - 1
1 - 5 2 1 2 -- - 6 - - - -- - - - - - -- - 1 - - - -
57 30 12 34 6 6 13 2 9- 2 - - - 1 - - 8- 1 - 1 2 1 - - -
3 - 1 2 1 - 1 1 1 2 - - 5 1 - - - - 7 2 - 4 1 1 - - - 6 6 3 4 - - 2 - - 6 - 1 5 - - - - - 8 2 2 1 - 1 1 - - 7 1 4 3 - - 1 - - 2 1 - 2 - - - 1 - 4 1 1 - - - 1 - -
11 2 - 3 - - 1 - - 1 4 - 2 - 2 3 - -- 8 - 2 1 - 3 - -- - - - - - - - -
3 1 2 - - - -
Notes 1.The partial revision of the Supervisory Regulations governing Multi-level Sales was promulgated on June 16,1999, and entered into effect on July 1, 1999.
2.Figures may add up to exceed the total because a case of decision ruling may be concerned with violation of morethan one article of SRMS.
Source Fair Competition Dept. of the Fair Trade Commission. 3.The Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act was promulgated and enacted on January 29, 2014.
( )Supervisory Regulations Governing Multi-level Sales
2 - --
Article22
Article23
Article24
Article38
- -
Article26
Article28
Article 16
Article17
Article18
Article19
Article20
Article21
Article25
28 3823 24 25 2616 17 18 2119 20( ) Multi-Level Marketing Supervision Act
22
Article 20 Article 22 Article 23 Article 25Article 15 Article 16 Article 17 Article 18 Article 19
20 22 23 2515 16 17 18 19Current Regulations
7 Article 7
3Para. 3
Article 4 5
Article 5
Previous Regulations
1Para. 1
2Para. 2
4Para. 4
61
Article 6 Para.14
Para. 4
Table 29 Decision Ruling for Multi-level Sales Enterprises by Illegal Articles
1992 - 2014
Other
-142-
Year & Month Laws &Regulations
Projects &Plans
Complaints Self-initiated Mergers
Total 16 460 7 969 8 491 426 272 5 246 741 712
81 1992 535 214 321 4 2 148 13 18 82 1993 749 278 471 4 1 290 24 38 83 1994 903 317 586 7 29 432 16 35 84 1995 946 354 592 1 19 455 14 18 85 1996 916 314 602 2 9 484 7 21
86 1997 868 399 469 - 19 328 13 33 87 1998 869 495 374 1 34 245 6 34 88 1999 864 466 398 - 42 261 7 26 89 2000 1 032 481 551 4 52 388 11 46 90 2001 942 427 515 24 26 354 13 59
91 2002 814 292 522 62 7 343 24 42 92 2003 647 264 383 21 12 248 39 48 93 2004 534 228 306 20 11 199 38 21 94 2005 564 239 325 22 6 179 49 40 95 2006 600 244 356 41 - 167 81 38
96 2007 491 195 296 22 - 149 71 39 97 2008 618 322 296 20 1 114 104 29 98 2009 576 342 234 17 2 122 34 24 99 2010 512 344 168 27 - 94 - 20100 2011 672 458 214 29 - 74 66 25
101 2012 677 480 197 47 - 54 55 16102 2013 571 425 146 21 - 63 26 15103 2014 560 391 169 30 - 55 30 27 1 Jan. 47 34 13 - - 5 4 3 2 Feb. 47 33 14 2 - 5 2 3 3 Mar. 47 29 18 6 - 2 4 3 4 Apr. 53 30 23 4 - 9 6 2 5 May 56 41 15 1 - 6 1 2 6 June 43 29 14 - - 7 - 4
7 July 41 30 11 1 - 8 - 1 8 Aug. 43 31 12 3 - 2 3 3 9 Sept. 42 29 13 4 - 2 - 2 10 Oct. 40 33 7 4 - 2 - 1 11 Nov. 44 32 12 2 - 2 4 2 12 Dec. 57 40 17 3 - 5 6 1
96 99
81 - 103
Total Report Discussion
-143-
Unit Case
Application forConcerted Action
Requests forExplanation
Special TopicResearch Others
Passed asProposed
Passed withAmendment
Pending forFurther
Discussion Others
28 563 204 299 5 658 1 804 711 318
… 95 5 36 135 101 53 32… 83 11 20 278 102 74 17… 52 7 8 389 107 84 6… 50 32 3 393 122 77 -… 48 31 - 442 109 46 5
… 51 23 2 355 89 22 3… 39 15 - 200 124 45 5… 46 16 - 217 118 61 2… 44 3 3 393 103 53 2… 16 7 16 363 99 35 18
… 11 11 22 385 77 11 49… 4 1 10 296 58 8 21… 4 - 13 227 44 27 8… 5 3 21 234 66 20 5… 1 13 15 239 83 14 20
… 1 6 8 190 74 17 15 7 1 7 13 199 70 17 10 6 6 2 21 171 49 10 4 1 3 3 20 104 39 9 16 4 2 4 10 135 53 7 19
7 - - 18 109 62 11 15- - 4 17 98 22 6 20
3 1 - 23 106 33 4 26- - - 1 9 2 1 1- 1 - 1 12 - - 2
1 - - 2 9 6 - 3- - - 2 14 7 - 2- - - 5 11 2 - 2- - - 3 10 2 1 1
- - - 1 6 4 - 1 1 - - - 5 4 - 3- - - 5 8 - 1 4- - - - 3 1 - 3- - - 2 6 3 - 3
1 - - 1 13 2 1 1Notes Number of application for concerted actions before 2007 were calculated in items of mergers Number of self-initiated investigations in 2010 were calculated in items of complaints.Source Secretariat of the Fair Trade Commission.
Table 30 Deliberation of Proposals
1992 - 2014
Discussed Items Resolutions
-144-
Year & MonthTotal
By PersonalPresence
ByTelephone Sub-Total
By PersonalPresence
ByTelephone
Total 302 686 21 438 281 248 260 363 10 843 249 520
81 1992 11 012 2 141 8 871 8 180 457 7 723 82 1993 9 736 942 8 794 7 853 327 7 526 83 1994 13 452 1 301 12 151 11 810 589 11 221 84 1995 14 085 1 301 12 784 12 177 568 11 609 85 1996 15 846 1 742 14 104 13 232 575 12 657
86 1997 15 700 1 370 14 330 13 658 588 13 070 87 1998 12 978 976 12 002 11 161 448 10 713 88 1999 12 858 765 12 093 10 966 350 10 616 89 2000 14 464 648 13 816 12 552 316 12 236 90 2001 14 073 594 13 479 12 425 324 12 101
91 2002 17 572 838 16 734 15 865 383 15 482 92 2003 16 832 890 15 942 14 431 342 14 089 93 2004 15 539 830 14 709 13 696 392 13 304 94 2005 15 882 957 14 925 14 403 703 13 700 95 2006 14 074 756 13 318 12 466 546 11 920
96 2007 13 570 993 12 577 11 912 739 11 173 97 2008 12 208 901 11 307 10 698 667 10 031 98 2009 12 120 882 11 238 10 468 639 9 829 99 2010 10 655 819 9 836 9 004 634 8 370100 2011 10 782 651 10 131 9 082 450 8 632
101 2012 10 619 438 10 181 8 821 319 8 502102 2013 9 717 362 9 355 8 013 256 7 757103 2014 8 912 341 8 571 7 490 231 7 259 1 Jan. 738 25 713 623 19 604 2 Feb. 634 37 597 556 25 531 3 Mar. 808 41 767 678 30 648 4 Apr. 799 20 779 675 15 660 5 May 739 25 714 625 21 604 6 June 632 35 597 526 26 500
7 July 739 32 707 605 23 582 8 Aug. 656 22 634 527 12 515 9 Sept. 671 22 649 558 14 544 10 Oct. 925 33 892 789 18 771 11 Nov. 755 20 735 629 13 616 12 Dec. 816 29 787 699 15 684
81 - 103
Total Explanation of the Laws and RegulationsAdministered by the FTC
-145-
Unit Case
Sub-TotalBy PersonalPresence
ByTelephone Sub-Total
By PersonalPresence
ByTelephone Sub-Total
By PersonalPresence
ByTelephone
16 986 8 211 8 775 13 613 1 243 12 370 11 724 1 141 10 583
2 111 1 567 544 330 61 269 391 56 335 833 491 342 530 49 481 520 75 445 928 544 384 422 59 363 292 109 183
1 107 595 512 591 71 520 210 67 1431 547 978 569 726 115 611 341 74 267
1 075 631 444 688 118 570 279 33 246 928 415 513 511 72 439 378 41 337 863 334 529 493 46 447 536 35 501 590 218 372 730 62 668 592 52 540 533 189 344 544 48 496 571 33 538
608 331 277 533 67 466 566 57 509 736 464 272 502 35 467 1 163 49 1 114 843 368 475 453 21 432 547 49 498 587 183 404 412 19 393 480 52 428 576 155 421 500 23 477 532 32 500
576 205 371 491 26 465 591 23 568 519 139 380 373 50 323 618 45 573 440 132 308 533 60 473 679 51 628 429 85 344 590 65 525 632 35 597 315 84 231 678 58 620 707 59 648
328 42 286 1 042 41 1 001 428 36 392 308 30 278 1 084 39 1 045 312 37 275 206 31 175 857 38 819 359 41 318
12 1 11 72 3 69 31 2 29 12 6 6 46 6 40 20 - 20 23 2 21 84 5 79 23 4 19 17 2 15 73 2 71 34 1 33 22 - 22 60 1 59 32 3 29 20 3 17 50 3 47 36 3 33
28 2 26 73 2 71 33 5 28 18 2 16 76 4 72 35 4 31 16 2 14 74 2 72 23 4 19 24 5 19 87 6 81 25 4 21
5 2 3 94 2 92 27 3 24 9 4 5 68 2 66 40 8 32
Source Dept. of Planning of the Fair Trade Commission.
Table 31 Services of Service Center
1992 - 2014
Provision of Educational Materials Explanation of Applied Item Acceptance of Complaints
-146-
Total Chairman'sOffice
ViceChairman's
Office
Commi-ssioners'Office
SecretaryGeneral's
Office
Counselors'Office
Dept. ofPlanning
Total 209 4 1 10 2 1 25 By Sex
Male 76 2 - 2 1 1 6 Female 133 2 1 8 1 - 19
By Age50 Years & Over 54 1 - 5 2 1 840~49 Years 93 2 1 2 - - 1030~39 Years 43 1 - 3 - - 529 Years & Less 19 - - - - - 2
By Position( ) 31 2 - 5 1 1 3
Special and Selected Appointment
( ) 137 2 - - 1 - 15Recommended Appointment
( ) 30 - 1 - - - 7Designated Appointment
11 - - 5 - - -Contracted Personnel
By Edu. attain 101 2 - 7 - 1 12
Graduate School 89 2 1 3 2 - 10
University 14 - - - - - 3
Junior College 5 - - - - - -
Senior High & Vocational
101 2 6
Item
103
-147-
Unit Person
Dept. ofServiceIndustry
Competition
Dept. ofManufactur-ing IndustryCompetition
Dept. of FairCompetition
Dept. ofLegal
Affairs
Informationand
EconomicAnalysisOffice
Secretariat PersonnelOffice
BudgetAccounting
andStatistics
Office
Civil ServiceEthics Office
31 27 31 21 16 22 6 10 2
13 15 13 7 8 6 - - 2 18 12 18 14 8 16 6 10 -
3 7 5 5 4 9 1 2 1 15 10 15 8 11 10 3 5 1
8 7 7 5 1 2 1 3 - 5 3 4 3 - 1 1 - -
3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1
23 20 25 14 13 12 3 8 1
3 4 2 3 - 7 2 1 -
2 - 1 1 1 1 - - -
14 16 18 10 9 4 2 5 1
16 10 13 10 6 9 4 2 1
1 1 - - 1 5 - 3 -
- - - 1 - 4 - - -
Note The Commission was restructured as the Fair Trade Commission on February 6, 2012.Source Personnel Office of the Fair Trade Commission.
Table 32 FTC Manpower Structure
End of 2014
-148-
Municipality/County Total Providing Forms& Data
DeliveringCase Document
ConductingEducational
Program
Total 905 261 127 18
New Taipei City 103 8 23 1
Taipei City 80 25 24 1
Taoyuan City 81 33 10 1
Taichung City 26 - 8 1
Tainan City 49 14 10 1
Kaohsiung City 17 - 6 1
Yilan County 17 1 12 1
Hsinchu County 49 24 - 1
Miaoli County 29 - 9 1
Changhua County 36 19 3 1
Nantou County 7 2 - -
Yunlin County 27 9 5 -
Chiayi County 11 2 1 1
Pintung County 6 - - 1
Taitung County 17 - - 1
Hualien County 54 31 1 1
Penghu County 12 7 - -
Keelung City 48 12 - 1
Hsinchu City 136 31 3 1
Chiayi City 72 34 8 1
Kinmen County 26 9 3 1
Lienchiang County 2 - 1 -
-149-
Unit Case
Collecting Evidence Checking Matters Collecting IndustrialData
Ad hoc Survey Other Matters
44 18 55 24 358
18 5 12 1 35 5 1 1 5 18 2 6 2 7 20
2 1 5 2 7 1 - 5 - 18- - 1 1 8
1 1 - - 1 1 - - - 23- - 9 - 10
- - 1 1 11- - - - 5
4 - 2 - 7
1 - 2 1 3- - 5 - -- - - - 16
- - 3 1 17- - - - 5
- - 4 1 30 6 - 1 2 92 3 4 2 2 18
- - - - 13- - - - 1
Note “Other Matters” mean attending meetings, supporting the FTC’s businesses such as providing transportations and meeting places.Source Dept. of Planning of the Fair Trade Commission.
Table 33 Supporting Activities of Local Governments
2014
-150-
2014 Unit Meeting
Area Total Conducted byFTC
Conducted byContracted
LocalGovernments
Conducted byContractedIndustrial
Associations
Other InvitedLectures onLaws and
RegulationsAdministered by
the FTC
Total 109 70 18 - 21
New Taipei City 3 1 1 - 1
Taipei City 35 24 1 - 10
Taoyuan City 7 3 1 - 3
Taichung City 11 8 1 - 2
Tainan City 7 5 1 - 1
Kaohsiung City 18 16 1 - 1
Yilan County 1 - 1 - -
Hsinchu County 1 - 1 - -
Miaoli County 1 - 1 - -
Changhua County 1 - 1 - -
Nantou County - - - - -
Yunlin County - - - - -
Chiayi County 3 2 1 - -
Pintung County 8 7 1 - -
Taitung County 2 1 1 - -
Hualien County 2 1 1 - -
Penghu County 2 2 - - -
Keelung City 1 - 1 - -
Hsinchu City 4 - 1 - 3
Chiayi City 1 - 1 - -
Kinmen County 1 - 1 - -
Lienchiang County - - - - -
Source Dept. of Planning of the Fair Trade Commission.
Table 34 Educational Seminars on FTA & MLMSA
IV. Appendix
�������
�����
����� �
-153-
�������
�����
��������� ������������������ !"#$%!&'�
()*+,!�-.%/012�3�4 �/5��!6789:;/5���< =
�>%?@A����< �(BCD�EFG��H���I)*�� �����J9
�K�?@LM�NOP?@�Q=
�R%S?@A����< �(BCD�EFG�!TUBCD�EVE�(WXYZ[
\]Q%��^_�� �������`Sa?@Q=S?@bc���defA
1.ghijkl�m 45K!m 46K�MQ=
2.no?@�30p AqrsStuSvw/0�M�x*p u�`yz{|}
u�~��(����Q=
3.�7AT����R�Q=
��%{�?�A����< �(BCD�EFG�!TUBCD�EVE�(WXY
Z[\]Q%���� �����!�����`���d�?���A
1.{`���!�}%A��S��)*?@LM����{���� ������
��!�S���� kl¡¢� ��£M�¤¥�`¦<3�{���=
2.§<��A��S��)*?@LM����{���� ��������!�
S���� kl¡¢� ��§¨�`3�{���=
3.O©��89ªw\]A��:©«¬�`��89ªw\]=
4.�7��AT������Q=
�%®¯V]A������3�°± ���`²u!Z �³789�´E:P78
9?]Qu!�7µ¢Sv�< =
1.®¯V]]6A(1)¶�< (2)·�< (3)789¸¹(4)µ¢Sv�[º�-.»
¼½¾¿!nZ�MÀPÁÂuT�³�-.»ÃÄuH��QÅ@Sv ���
���M%=
2.®¯V]ÆÇA(1)OÈ(2)ÉÊ(3):789\]=
����� �
��Zijkl�m 14K�M��`4 �¾©Ãw{�Ë�< _¾©ÌÍÃw{
����< =
�>%YÎA��¾©Ãw{�Ë�< !¾©ÌÍÃw{�Ë���< �(B
CD�EFG!ÏÐ�)*ËLMQ=
-154-
�R%Ñ@YÎÑ@Ò½A��¾©Ãw{�Ë�< !¾©ÌÍÃw{�Ë��
�< �(BCD�EFG!ÏÐ�Ó¾©���)*Ñ@ËÑ@Ò½�LMQ
=
��%Ò½A��¾©Ãw{�Ë�< !¾©ÌÍÃw{�Ë���< �(B
CD�EFG!ÏÐ�Ó¾©���)*Ò½LMQ=
�%®¯V]A��¾©��3ÔÕ�ijkl�3���!< ?]ÆÇT�Ö���
�e�×(WÎÆ<Q=
�������
��Zijkl�m 11K�M��`4 �BؾÏÆw�< =
�>%SÙ¯ÆwA��¾ÏÆw�< �(BCD�EVELESÙ¯Æw!SÚEQ=
�R%Ù¯ÆwA��¾ÏÆw�< �(BCD�EVELEÙ¯ÆwQ=
��%®¯V]A��¾Ï.»�ÁÂSÛÜ�( �ÔÀ}¦ÝÞ�ßànÀ}!À}Þ
áBÁÂâSÛÜQ�!< ?]ÆÇT�Ö�R��eQ=
����
���ã89u�`.»_·ä4 �å©�æ�9 ������< �!�ã.»O©
çM�Tgh ������çM<=
�>%�æ<A�� ���ã89u�`.»u!>è·äå©æéê����ë� �
����%�ì{á��9�íîï�ðñ³@òQ�(BCD�EFG)*�æóQ
=
�R%ôõ<A
1.��Zö �y)*��æ<\]�TUBCD�EVE�(WXYZ[æÈ
Q�!©æ�éï���÷yñó�M!���óïyJøùú×TûE�TUü
�ðæ�ýZþ{���Ma�OÈ\]Q=
2.OÈ��!��.»©� �çM�< =
��%®¯V]A��©æ< �Oõ���° ���`²� �T��æQ�!Oõ�
����(¦Ý;ó.»Àñ�n½È!Sa�]Q=
�������
�����<u¾©Ãw{�<u¾ÏÆw<_©æ<� � �Z¸����^_�
� ���������Z>M?]µ¢*���Ê<=�� ����<�ÊQu��C
D�õQu°/5��Q�_789:;°/5���<$�±�=
�>%?@A�����Ê< �(BCD�EFG���Ê�I)*�� �����J
9�K�?@LM�NOP?@�Q=
-155-
�������
����
�������
�R%S?@A�����Ê< �(BCD�EFG�!TUBCD�VE�(WXY
Z[\]Q%�H���`Sa?@Q=S?@bc���defA
1.ghijkl�m 45K!m 46K�MQ=
2.no?@�30p Ano?@�30p qrsStuSvw/0�M�x*p
u�`yz{|}Q=
3.�7AT����R�Q=
��%{�?�A����Ê< (BCD�EFG�!TUBCD�VE�(WXYZ
[\]Q%���� �����!�����`���d�?���A
1.{`���!�}%A��S��)*?@LM����{���� ������
��!�S���� kl¡¢� ��£M�¤¥�`¦<3�{���=
2.§<��A��S��)*?@LM����{���� ��������!�
S���� kl¡¢� ��§¨�`3�{���=
3.O©��89ªw\]A��:©«¬�`��89ªw\]=
4.�7��AT������Q=
�%®¯�ÊA��Z¸����Ê< �(�ÊÆÇ° �¸¹��!����� Ô
��(WÏÆ<Q=
��A ��@e_Mï� 83� 12� 22�`²�ÏFG¦��� 84� 1�3��N� 84
� 9�u91� 2�u94� 8�u100� 2�u101� 8� }=
-156-
Major Statistical Terminologies
I. Complaint
Complaint refers to a case filed by reporting agency or referred by other government agencies
in writing (including E-mail and fax) or oral (recorded by the FTC) to the FTC, stating a possible
violation of the provisions of the laws enforced by the FTC.
1. Decision
Decision refers to a complaint reviewed and a disposition made by the FTC’s
Commissioners Meeting that the defendant is confirmed to violate the laws enforced by the FTC
and will receive a decision document.
2. No-action Decision
No-action decision refers to a complaint reviewed (or authorized persons in accordance
with a precedent) and a disposition made by the FTC’s Commissioners Meeting that the
defendant is confirmed not to violate the laws enforced by the FTC. Reasons for the no-action
decision can be classified into following categories:
(1) Cases subject to the regulation by the Article 45 or the Article 46 of the FTA.
(2) Failing to meet substantive prerequisites: insufficient evidences, failing to meet substantive
criteria; the defendant had already taken corrective measure, or in a minor case a settlement
had already been reached between two sides.
(3) Others: reasons may not be classified into the aforementioned items.
3. Administrative Action
Administrative action refers to measures taken by the FTC’s Commissioners Meeting (or
authorized persons in accordance with a precedent) in response to a defendant who violated the
laws enforced by the FTC or the spirit thereof. Administrative action could be any of the
followings:
(1) Industrial warning (guidance): cases for which no decision ruling will be made before a
general administrative guidance is issued to require a large number of specific parties’
correction of behavior that might violate the laws enforced by the FTC or affect trading order.
(2) Business warning: cases for which no decision ruling will be made before an administrative
guidance is issued to require an individual party’s correction of behavior that might violate the
laws enforced by the FTC or affect trading order.
(3) Written advice for competent authority to take appropriate measures: cases for which the
competent authority is advised by the FTC to take appropriate measures to solve competition
concerns.
(4) Other measuresAcases that may not be classified into the aforementioned three items.
4. Termination of Review
-157-
Termination of review refers to the complaint goes beyond FTC’s responsibilities, shall be
referred to another agency according to division of jurisdictions between agencies, or fails to
meet the FTC’s procedural requirements.
(1) Reasons for termination of reviewA�criminal case, �civil dispute, �case fallen upon other
agency’s responsibility, and �failing to meet procedural requirements (e.g., the filing party
withdrew its complaint, failed to supplement information required, been out of contact,
complained anonymously, or the complained party not fitting into the definitions stipulated in
the laws enforced by the FTC).
(2) Results of Terminating ReviewA�replied with a written explanation, �filed for record, or
�referred to another agency.
II. Application for Concerted Action
Application for concerted action refers to an application submitted by enterprises to the FTC
for an approval to conduct a concerted action and amendment of approved content of a concerted
action according to the Article 14 of the Fair Trade Act.
1. Approved
An approved case refers to an application for concerted action and amendment of approved
content of a concerted action for which the FTC decides to grant approval at its Commissioners’
Meeting.
2. Partially Approved
A case partially approved refers to an application for concerted action and amendment of
approved content of a concerted action for which the FTC decides to grant approval for part of
the applied items at its Commissioners’ Meeting.
3. Rejected
A rejected case refers to an application for concerted action and amendment of approved
content of a concerted action against which the FTC decides to reject at its Commissioners’
Meeting.
4. Termination of Review
A review of an application case is terminated refers to an application which contains a fact
taking place before the Fair Trade Act became effective, or a case whose handling results can not
be classified into any one of the aforementioned three categories and which is already closed as
proposed.
III. Merger Notifications
It refers to a merger notification filed by an enterprise to the FTC according to the Article 11 of
the Fair Trade Act.
1. Merger not Prohibited
-158-
Merger not prohibited refers to a merger proposal not prohibited or objected by the
Commissioners’ Meetings of the FTC.
2. Merger Prohibited
Merger prohibited refers to a merger proposal prohibited by the Commissioners’ Meetings
of the FTC.
3. Termination of Review
Termination of review happens either when notifying parties fail to provide sufficient
documents to meet the FTC’s written request, or the results of cases handling cannot be
categorized into merger not prohibited or merger prohibited.
IV. Request for Explanation
Request for explanation refers to a request of a government agency, an enterprise, or an
individual to the FTC for explanation of certain provisions of the laws enforced by the FTC or a
written request of a government agency to comment whether a case is applicable to the laws
enforced by the FTC.
1. Explanation
Explanation refers to a written statement which, issued by the FTC’s Commissioner’
Meeting, deliberates and analyzes the meanings of the laws enforced by the FTC for its
enforcement work upon a government agency, an enterprise, or an individual’s request.
2. Inquiry-answering
(1) Inquiry-answering refers to a response provided by responsible personnel, instead of the FTC
Commissioners’ Meeting, in accordance with a previous explanation or based on the existent
laws and regulations whose provisions are already adequate to clarify the question raised or
whose provisions are very clear without controversy and need no further interpretation.
(2) It also refers to a response to a request of FTC’s advisory opinion by a court, a prosecutor’s
office, or an investigation agency.
3. Termination of Review
Termination of review happens when a request for explanation goes beyond the FTC’s
responsibilities and for which the FTC has no authority to provide explanation, or the contents of
the request are vague and the party making such request fails to respond to or ignores the FTC’s
request for supplementary explanation.
V. FTC Self-initiated Investigation
The FTC self-initiated investigation means that the FTC take initiative to investigate, per its
authorization and duties, possible illegal actions against the laws enforced by the FTC in accordance
with an established procedure. This category includes actions taken by the FTC itself and triggered
by the oral interpellation by the legislators, anonymous complaints, and anonymous complaints
referred by other agencies.
-159-
1. Decision
Decision refers to a disposition made by the FTC’s Commissioners’ Meeting that a FTC
self-initiated investigation case is confirmed to violate the laws enforced by the FTC and will
receive a decision document.
2. No-action Decision
No-action decision refers to a disposition made by the FTC’s Commissioners Meeting (or
authorized persons in accordance with a precedent) that a FTC self-initiated investigation case is
confirmed no violation of the FTA or relevant regulation. Reasons for the no-action decision can
be classified into following categories:
(1) Applicable to Article 45~46: cases subject to the regulation by Article 45~46, FTA.
(2) Failing to meet substantive prerequisites: insufficient evidences, failing to meet substantive
criteria; the defendant had taken corrective measure already, or in a minor case a settlement
had already been reached between two parties.
(3) Others: reasons may not be classified into the aforementioned items.
3. Administrative Action
Administrative action refers to measures taken by the FTC’s Commissioners Meeting (or
authorized persons in accordance with a precedent) in response to a FTC self-initiated
investigation case which violated the laws enforced by the FTC or the spirit thereof.
Administrative action could be any of the followings:
(1) Industrial warning (guidance): cases for which no decision ruling will be made before a
general administrative guidance is issued to require a large number of specific parties’
correction of behavior that might violate the laws enforced by the FTC or affect trading order.
(2) Business warning: cases for which no decision ruling will be made before an administrative
guidance is issued to require an individual party’s correction of behavior that might violate the
laws enforced by the FTC or affect trading order.
(3) Written advice for competent authority to take appropriate measures: Cases for which the
agency-in-charge is advised by the FTC to take appropriate measures to solve competition
concerns.
(4) Other measuresACases which may not be classified into the aforementioned three items.
4. Investigation Suspended
Termination of review happens when a FTC self-initiated investigation case goes beyond
FTC’s responsibilities or should be monitored and then closed.
Note�The terms and the definitions were approved by the FTC staff meeting on December 22, 1994, came into effect
in January 1995, and were then amended in September 1995, February 2002, August 2005, February 2011,
and August 2012 respectively.
-160-
�� ���
List of Decision Rulings
�� 103�
2014
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
������� �������������� �
����
�������������� !"#$%&
��'()*��+,-.$����/01��
2�3-.$�����������4�56)
7789:-.$;<��=5 >�:/7�:-.$���=
5?7@:-.$���=5 >�:/7�:-AB�CD
EFEGHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����X� ���������� [D\]^_`a
���� bcddef�
cghc�eei8j�
�klmnoFpqr�stT� �UVW �u Y�
������� ��������9� vwxyz���
���
{n|}~�������������V��
���T�
�UVW X� YF � �
��F|}~���
��VW 9YW �Z
������� ��������9� �����l�`
a�����
� !"#� �f� ��$����-�C��F
stHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����@� ��������u� � �`a��
���
{n|}~�����¡¢O��V���£¤
¥��T�
�UVW X� YF � �
��F|}~���
��VW 9YW �Z
�����>� ��������7� ¦)§¨`a��
���
���$©ª«-¬�®¯°��±²³´µ
¶·R�M¸q¹�#º c� ´ � »¼�½¶¾
¿�À�ÁÂ+,ÃOÄÅsÆ�HÇÈÉ
ÊÁËÌÍFÎÏÐHT�
�UVW X� Y�
�����9� ���������� ÑÒÓo�����Ô�¶O�ÕrÖ¿ !"#$×q�Ø�Ù®
ÚÛÜÝo ÞßØ�ÖàÙºáâßØ-�C
DEFEGHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����u� ��������@� ã°äå�æ¨�
�����
Ô�¶OçèMéêëìíOQßF��îï
ð�íñòQßóô�õö÷ø�äå��Hù
úûüýþ����äå����¦�z��ä�
�UVW X� Y�
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
-161-
�� ���
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
� � � å��FL�ó�þz���HÇÈÉÊÁ
ìÌÍFÎÏzHT�
�
�����7� ��������>� Ú ���ê`a
�����
Ô�¶O����ð��$��.�����§
�-M$���o¨�� ����� ���-�C
��FEGHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
������� ��������9� Ú!§¨����
."#$����
���
Ô�¶O��$Ú%8&E-§'��(����
�)*�+Do ,-.$¬/0 1234+
5÷�67 U85÷-�CDEF39HIJ
KLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
������� ��������9�:;&)<z��
����
Ô�¶O� fgi=l>DE��"#$?=l�
��:@��:-.$�=?l ��:@��:-A�CDEF
EGHIJALMNOPQFRSB�{n|}
~������CL�¹£¤¥��T�
�UVW X� YW � Z
.W X� YF � ��F
|}~�����V
W @YW �Z�
�����X� �������X��DEVOFGH�
IJ�¥�
Ô�¶O�¥&KèêL�MNRO�õ¥P
�qQ¥PnoRSTÇÈÉÊUVWXF²Y
Z[T�
�UVW �� YW �Z
������� �������X��\]l^`a��
���
Ô�¶O�U_l^����ó`a=[bc
Ò®defDE�CDEFEGHIJKLMN
OPQFRSB��U_l^��gtFhi�
jklnoimZn�o�þçpqrdefD
EEGHA�UFhis]�HÇÈÉÊÁËÌ
ÍFtu�UFÐHT�
�UVW X� YW � Z
.W X� Y�
������� �������X�� vKSwxyû
;�����
xy��$0z{-§'¬���|§'}�
~�q����$��Á� >�� ef�l�-�C
ó��F39HIJKLMNOPQFRST
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����@� �������Xu����� �� Ô�¶O{n|}~������CL�¹£¤
¥��T�
�UVW X� YF � �
��F|}~���
��VW @YW �Z
�����>� �������X7� [��-`a��
���
Ô�¶O{n|}~�����M��qYÆM
t����L�¹£¤¥��T�
�UVW X� YF � �
��F|}~���
��VW 9YW �Z
-162-
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
�����9� �����X��>�����wêÓ`
a����.��
§¨no`a��
��.��)<�
¾`a�����
Ô�¶O��$�����-.$���å>-.$
��0¦G-A§'������$��8X� ��
É��woG÷��3�1�-�CDEF39
HIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����u� �����X��9���)� ���
��
Ô�¶O� !C�\l��DE���$Ô)
<�����H���wE-.$4 m�w
E ¡¢-ÈM$��?[WúE¡-AB�C
óDEF39MEGHIJKLMNOPQF
RST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����7� �����X���� ì� ����� � £c¤¥¥ ¦§¨© !�� ªf�� eh�f� @«��
�����î®cdh�g��g¬�ge�g�i®ßØ�CD
EFEGHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����X�� �����X��7�\¯6°`a��
���
±íq²³´Dµ$l¶·��st¸H¹¤·
s �/@º-»H¼½óll¶·²¸DFÁìY
¾�¿�ÈKÀÁ�V�ílnoKHstFd
e�Â��kdeÃÄÅ�UdeFÆT�
�UVW �7 YFW �
�
����X�� �����X�X��Çȧ¨`a��
���
��$ÇÈ X�É�-§'�� Ê�.Ê@.Ê> M Ê9
UËÌÍMNa�ÈI���ÎSHÏ3ÐÑM
´ÒÓG�CDEF39M�ÔHIJKLMN
OPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����XX� �����X�X��Õll[`a��
���
��$ÖiÊ ×l9lØ-DE����$ÙÚÛ
ÜlØúºÈqÝÞ-�CDEFEGHIJA
LMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����X�� �����X�X�����A ��� �ßàÃá�$4�Hâãâäw�å¥-�n
Ú�Ñ�æz��âã.âäst��Èr�ç
¿îï奥P�èõÈKÀÁ�V�íóln
oKHstdeFzH�T��kdeÃÄÅ�
UdeFÆT�
�UVW �7 YFW �
�
����X�� �����X�X>��é}¯�������� !��$�é �777 2xo ê-M$
!��é}¯vëWìí)îEG�Ø ï¢ð
�UVW X� YW �Z
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
-163-
��� ����� ���� ��� � ����� ��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
� � � ð-�ÈUñòØ�T��� !F$�}yó
-M$Lôøõ- ö¶÷"#|ø¨ùÑ�ú
�ó�*Ñ�F�}yóMLûyóUñA�C
��FEGHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�
����X@� �����X�X>�����wêÓ`
a����.��
§¨no`a��
���
C$üý-§'þ�����$�>> ����S
�Wú-M$Ú+� �>> ����S�÷-�C
DEF39HIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����X>� �����X�X9��)<`a��
���
�$�Iôg�-°�kû�D���D
EFst�� �UÁìVW �u Yg�T�
�UVW �u Y�
����X9� �����X�X9���)<`a��
���
�kû�D���>�ADEstT� �UVW �u Y�
����Xu� ��������@���0���`a
�����
�$m�>�>���-��������~F
�kY¾�CDEF39HIJALMNOPQ
FRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����X7� ��������9���[�� `a
�����
��$���-DE����$ÙÚÛÜlØú
ºÈqÝÞ-M$ÙÚÛÜlØÝÞ �@X 2-�
CDEFEGHIJALMNOPQFRST
�UVW X� YW �Z
������� ����������0ô)<�ê`a
�����
��� !��$° !F"'��+W° ÷
Çîæ��#��$���5���:-�C��F
EGHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
������� ����������4 �xy`a
�����
� !�� X��� 2$vë)îE¡%ü¢&'
�()*-�C��FEGHIJKLMNOPQ
FRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����X� ��������u�+|,^§¨`a
�����
�\]Ñ�"-$.hi�¥ª /0-§'����
�$W0á12�D�¥�33�� �X�-�C
DEFEGHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
������� �������X��4!no`a��
���
{n|}~�������D%4M567�8
q9 �� Ñ3��V�:��D;³;�T�
|}~����VW
X� Y�
-164-
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
������� �������X��<=§¨`a��
���
Ô�¶O���$<=�Âá-¬�®¯�+
,ÃO>?@� C±²�q·�HÇÈÉÊ
ÁìÌÍFtu�UzHT�
�UVW X� Y�
�����@� �������X��A/�ê`a��
���
���$Aî B/ÉCD-¬�®¯��±²³´µ
¶·RM+,ÃO>?@� C±²�q·
�HÇÈÉÊÁìÌÍFÎÏzHT�
�UVW X� Y�
�����>� �������X��EF�ꧨ`a
�����
���$Ú-G-¬�®¯�+,ÃO>?
@� C±²�q·�HÇÈÉÊÁìÌÍFt
u�UzHT�
�UVW X� Y�
�����9� �������X�����A X�� �HI�Ü��"#$�ØJKWú~HL @�
OÈq-�C��F39HIJKLMNOPQ
FRSB��HI�Ü®¯°���¸s�Üû
üVM¹�È·Ë£ÁËUrON¶�O$��
HPWQùú�ÜþRF6n.üo�SMqú
2c%4.56�qh5FT/¾U-Aâ+Á
˾¿�HÇÈÉÊVW�ÜÁËÌÍFtu�
UÐHT�
�UVW X� YW � Z
.W X� Y�
�����u� ��������X�TX��no��
��.YZLo`
a�����
��$gÖdfª�[-§'���r�í�¶÷H
\]}o÷F§'�í�ú^�_F�BMhi
R�CóDEF�ÔHIJKLMNOPQFR
ST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����7� ����������4 `ä`a��
���
�kû�D��`ä¡wEFstT� �UVW �u Y�
������� ����������a!Lo`a��
���
b�0þ2cd¢RS�ó�Ú¢Z$a!ef
_0�� ��2gháiÖ-¢�®Á�HÈ,j
F�V�ídefFÁìUrOôækÁìFz
H���kdeÃÄÅ�UdeFÆT�
�UVW �7 YFW �
�
������� ��������9�lm)<`a��
���
�kû�D��én+wEFstT� �UVW �u Y�
�����X� ��������9�o�HîpqrD
oùo�¥�
� ���2 �s X@ Ño�HqEtêWX�Èuv
²¸n6KÇH��±K�±í�õ¥PHw
�UVW �7 YFW �
�
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
-165-
��� ����� ���� ��� � ����� ��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
� � � bX>jÑKxXÁìFyy&��¿�ÈKÀÁ�
V�ílnoMôÛ<FzH�Â��kdeF
ÆT�
�
������� ��������>� � z�`a��
���
��°zL{$§|} -Â�C~<»�§f
F§|} �{§|FâÍs�Ãh�»H}
/�����C<»�§f��ȧ|�C�
s»H/����Â04ü�}¯|s2�5F
â��H�ÀÁ��r�²�|����ofF
�+�V�¨�?O�÷��FzH�õ��n
oól��WX�°FzHT�
�UVW �� YFW �
�
������� ��������>�J��o����
.����Lo�
���.�-��
����.���
�����.��
�� o����
.¡Ó�����
�.¢c��}o
`a����.£
¤������.
�¥����.§
°}¯`a���
�.§�Lo`a
����.��
�`a����.
¦�§��¨©�
����.ôªü
�����.«Ò
��¬<}��
��.�T o`
a�����
<y£�²®´L{¯�� �±í��¨©�
stq°FÛ<zH�ÇÈÉÊ�±�÷��¨
©�WX²YZ[T�
�UVW �� YW �Z
-166-
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
�����@� ��������>�üc��}o`a
����.²³�
�}o`a���
�.�,��}o
����.¡��
�����.´µ
��}o`a��
��.¶· o`
a����.¸�
��`a�����
r���¨©�F�sxz<y�ÇÈÉÊ/�
�÷��¨©�WX²YZ[T�
�UVW �� YW �Z
�����>� ��������9�¹D"º»¼½¾
`a����4
¶���
�l�"¿$ÀÜ�-E¡ÁÂÃÄÅ����
�$Æ�hÀÜ���=ÇÁÂÃÄÅE¡È-
�CDEFEGHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����9� �������X��Éʽ)<`a�
����
{n|}~�������DEFEZ��V�
��£¤¥��T�
|}~����VW9
YW �Z�
�����u� �������X����� � � � �
§ oD�
H��äåÌÍ�Èb�$�� êR¥-M
΢RS�HÏ�¬�ÁìÐ�FñòM�Ѻ
¥�xÂr�DEstHKÁFÒÓ�ÔÈo�
PÕÖñò �î�xz×ØÙ��Úíñò�
æ�yy1*ÛÜFÝà��ÂHÁì&��è
ó�þ��zH�HÇÈÉÊÁìÌÍFÎÏM
tu�UzHT�
�UVW X� Y�
�����7� �������X���Þ§¨�������$ß�&W-§'Â�r�í�¶÷Hà]
}o÷ǧ'í�ú^�á�BMÌ�aSF
���CDEF�Ôô39HIJKLMNOP
QFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����@�� �������X����� � � � Ëã
ãäå�æ oD�
HKÁ��äå��TÇÈÉÊÁìÌÍ
FÎÏzH���¤¥ ��X2 9s � Ñ��âW
��X���$�¶·yã�æ�¶·�)F~Ñä�
*Ëå6ó�VzHT�
W �� YW �Z�
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
-167-
��� ����� ���� ��� � ����� ��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
����@�� �������Xu�æçè`a���
�.éê o`a
�����
Ô�¶OAûë¼ùûü�<o�UÁìVW >
YW � ZW � ÆFs<ì��í)ùVW �� Y
W � ZW � Æg�Fî�ïð�ñ�ùVW ��
YF �4Òm�Ýò�¸î�s<Â�î�T
�UVW �� YW �Z
����@X� �������Xu�4 ÚóÚ`a�
����
���zS)ô�����Có��F39HI
JKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����@�� ����������0õ�ö÷|�E
�����
�k�²û�no��$�øDùúûÉ-üýþ÷|�
UADEFstT�
�UVW �u Y�
����@�� �����@����4 l�`a��
���
� !M³�þ��°��l�$�R�-��
î®[))î��� ¥P�g®QßØA39
��í��g®ßØÎ�Mç�$�g®�c�gh��X�@��@@�
cûûù�É�d¬�����X����-â�F(¾�CDEE
GHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����@@� �����@��X��¤§¨`a��
���
�$ü�a\-§'��a��µ c� ´V�
»°ÍÎSHÏ3ÐÑFú½¶�CDEF�Ô
M39HIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����@>� �����@��u�c�no`a��
���
{n|}~�������DEEZ���L�
¹£¤¥��T�
|}~����VW9
YW �Z�
����@9� �����@��u�4 �[¾���
���
{n|}~�������DEEZ���L�
¹£¤¥��T�
|}~����VW9
YW �Z�
����@u� �����@��7���ô`a���
��
��� !���Ü$U��L� > u�s-
F ö39�C��F39HIJKLMNOP
QFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����@7� �����@���� [$)<�|�
`a�����
{n|}~�����|}~����VW �9
YW�Zg��V���3£¤¥ÅÀó¸��
F(¾.¾UT�
|}~����VW9
YW �Z�
����>�� �����@��@�¹ºD�ªî�,
�l¶`a���
��
ôÑD�Ø`a����.ÑD��jl`a�
���Aofk���·�¨� i�/ª Î�gt
�ȼù¼½���{� i�/ª��ñ ,WX
F���°��WXÝnt���Ýà�� K
OÔ¼½O!"F�¥�M#$+µ�¼½ F�
�UVW �� YFW X
�
-168-
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
� � � /s���õKÁ+µ¼½ FstT� �
����>�� �����@��>�%õ&'Dç([
`a����4
¶���
ÈAÁ��h �)±�)Ò*�+ i.i ¥P
>�MÈAÁ������±� .hd� cghc ¥P
½�jí��f»�Áì&�T�
�UVW X� Y�
����>X� �����@��>�,-§¨�ê��
���
� !��$¤���*ü§�êÈ �@ 2�H
ùo.¼/0�m�'�FÝo§¨��-�C
DEFEGHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����>�� �����@��7� 1)<�ê`a
�����
{n|}~�����|}~����VW �9
YW�Zg��V���3£¤¥ÅÀó¸��
F(¾.¾UT�
|}~����VW9
YW �Z�
����>�� �����@�X��2��� {n|}~�����|}~����VW �9
YW�Zg��V���3£¤¥ÅÀó¸��
F(¾.¾UT�
|}~����VW9
YW �Z�
����>@� �����@�X��3ü4=� `a
�����
�� É5��6ÉÍS789:��� öÈa�;³
$�X��<=>�ùúÉC�>æ#� ���?ú6øDÉC¶@-����
$�=�4A}BCDE�33�bDEFGð
33�6b.6=±x>æ#FGZ=33çð
�=H;DE-M$H;DE�K�IJFØð
ʪfcKh�L�®c�g�MúDN�øD�ʪfcKh�L�g«fc�-A
=]�CDEFEGM�ÔHIJKLMNOP
QFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����>>� �����@�XX��µLo`a��
���
�wE����óH$��ÝêE¡OPÔQR
Súè�D-T�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����>9� �����@�Xu���� � � � �
���
��$ec�¬¥ªf-§'���í�lno¦�M
T}UËaFÐÑÌÍSyMNa�CDEFE
GM�ÔHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����>u� �����@�Xu� )U� `a��
���
îïdefV�®�F æst��rKÌ<F
defW�H½,O�£¨© !±³�»½X
½�b�±íóKH�sde�èõÈKÀÁ�
V�ílnoKHstFdeFzHT�
�UVW �7 YFW �
�
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
-169-
��� ����� ���� ��� � ����� ��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
����>7� �����@�Xu� ãY����� çèMéêëìíOQßF��îïð�íñò
Qßóô�õö÷ø�äå��Hùúûüý
þ����äå����¦�z��äå��
FL�ó�þz���HÇÈÉÊÁìÌÍF
ÎÏzHT�
�UVW X� Y�
����9�� �����>��@�Z[no�����{n|}~������D56�q��;³;
�Â��È��D�Ãst 7�:\���D�µ
�FDET�
|}~����VW
X� YW XZ�
����9�� �����>��@�s])<¾¿ �
����
� ö"-hi��°���$¥P�|-�C
��F6^HIJKLMNOPQFRSB��
ö"-hi��°�ÈALMNOQß��_
hderr���q`aM;��k���HÇ
ÈÉÊÁËÌÍtu�UFÐHT�
�UVW X� YW � Z
.W X� Y�
����9X� �����>��7����� �� �á�°bcdeÛf¥¥Ú�Ñ�æz��g
hst���|Ûf¥Fi½�ï�õ¥P�è
õÈKÀÁ�V�íólnoKHstdeFz
H�T��kdeÃÄÅ�UdeFÆT�
�UVW �7 YFW �
�
����9�� �����>��7�j\)<[9��
���
{n|}~������CL�¹£¤¥��T�|}~����VW>
YW �Z�
����9�� �����>��7�j\)<[9��
���
ö���ñ) u72 �Xs X Ñx*�CDEF
EGM39HIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����9@� �����>����:kiÖDz� � uu7� °lÖ m¨:kiÖtê�X
bNDDûn��CMú68uu7�8<�?8DM�ú6Éo8ND?>j�"-$pw
dù�D�6�LÉ6X�X��>2³�J�R-°lÖ���
CDEFstHIJALMNOPQFRST
�UVW X� YW �Z
����9>� �����>��X�Fä������ � ö"-$úrúhiR-�Clno$qq
�-â+Á쾿HNOPQFRS�ya��
þçpq��A�UFhis]�¿�ÇÈÉÊ
ÁËÌÍFtu�UÐHT�
�UVW X� Y�
����99� �����>����4 ÚÖr`a�
����
�¾�¨stÖr`a������µ�stÖ
r`a����`a)*�R&½`a0¶F
�UVW �� YW �Z
-170-
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
� � � úÈq�T�uvÃÑvwkstÖr`a��
��Fo�ûüMOnà0�<o�UÁìVW
> YW � ZW X ÆMW @ Æg�Fs<ì��í
)ùVW �� YW � ZW X Æg�Fî�ïð�
T��ùVW �� YF � n¹î�F4Òm�Ý
ò�¸î�s<Â�î�T�
�
����9u� �����>����4 ÚÖr`a�
���.ªt/¯
֮k��o��
��.sx/¯Ö
®k��`a��
��.stÖr`
a�����
4 ÚÖr`a����Ù®stÖr`a�
���í�sx/¯Ö®k��`a����
Mªt/¯Ö®k��o����ý+üoô
¾w�<o�UÁìVW >YW �ZW �ÆFs
<ì�B4 ÚÖr`a����Ù®stÖr
`a����Ñvwksx/¯Ö®k��`
a����Mªt/¯Ö®k��o����
Fo�ûü�<oùVW >YW �ZW @Æg�
Fs<ì��í)ùVW �� YW � ZW X Æg
�Fî�ïð�T��ùVW �� YF � n¹î
�F4Òm�Ýò�¸î�s<Â�î�T�
�UVW �� YW �Z
����97� �����>����4 ÚÖr`a�
���.y^/¯
֮k�����
��
4 ÚÖr`a����í�y^/¯Ö®k
������ý+üoM¾w�<o�UÁìV
W >YW �ZW �Æg�Fs<ì�B4 ÚÖ
r`a����ñ�uvwky^��Fo�
ûü�<oùVW >YW �ZW @Æg�Fs<
ì��í)ùVW �� YW � ZW X Æg�Fî
�ïð�T��ùVW �� YF � n¹î�F4
Òm�Ýò�¸î�s<Â�î�T�
�UVW �� YW �Z
����u�� �����>��>�z��Rî`a�
����
{n|}~������CL�¹£¤¥���
������kc���L�¹£¤¥��T
|}~����VW>
YW �Z.W 9YW �
Z�
����u�� �����>��7�{|)<������HI�Ü®¯°���¸s�ÜûüVM¹�
È·Ë��£ÁËUrON¶T���O�C
ük¹ô�Üük®¯°F��.DνF½,�
�UVW X� Y�
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
-171-
��� ����� ���� ��� � ����� ��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
� � � 39ô�=��.}~�øF39.��HPW
Qùú�ÜþRFqú2c%4ô56�qh5
FT/¾U�M�ÜûüVMF�kA�Üâ+
¾¿�HÇÈÉÊ�W�ÜÁËÌÍFtu�U
ÐHT�
�
����uX� �����>��7�\O6°��`a
�����
{n|}~�������D�q%4�=9 ��
Ñ3�����DÃ\;�DE�@s T�
|}~����VW
X� YW XZ.W X� Y
����u�� �����>�X>� °�)<no��
���
�HI�Ü®¯°���¸s�ÜûüVM¹�
È·Ë£ÁìUrON¶T�����Cük
¹F��ô��HPWQùú�ÜþRF6n.
üo�SMqú2c%4.56�qh5FT/
¾UA�Üâ+¾¿�HÇÈÉÊ�W�ÜÁì
ÌÍFtu�UzHT�
�UVW X� Y�
����u�� �����>������zS`a��
���
� !"#$gK�6ÉDM�ù�C�.7�X-DE���Có
DEFEGHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����u@� �����>������zS`a��
��.�þlm`
a�����
� !"#$gK� .7�X-U_l^DE���C
óDEFEGHIJKLMNOPQFRST
�UVW X� YW �Z
����u>� �����9������� � � � Ëã
���äå oD�
éêëËíOQßF��îïð�íñòQßó
ô�õö÷ø�äå��Hùúûüýþ���
�����Ð��äå��FL�ó�þÐ
���HÇÈÉÊÁËÌÍFÎÏÐHT�
�UVW X� Y�
����u9� �����9��u��/��Rno`
a�����
{n|}~�������DEEZ���L�
¹£¤¥��T�
|}~����VW9
YW �Z�
����uu� �����9����¸�§¨`a��
���
���$� //�÷-¬�®¯�+,ÃO
>?@� C±²�q·`a�HÇÈÉÊÁì
ÌÍFtu�UzHT�
�UVW X� Y�
����u7� �����9���� ��§¨���
��
��$4f-§'����qµ�4°ÍÎSH
Ï3ÐÑÇú½¶�CDEF�ÔM39HIJ
KLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
-172-
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
����7�� �����9���� UlØ`a��
��.Ú�lØ`
a����.t�
lØ`a����
.t[lØ`a�
���.)�lØ
`a����.��
<y��V�ô4 lØ`a����FÃ�
l�5�íÇÈÉÊ)3êlWXF²YZ[�
� �UÁìVW �� YW � Z¤(Û<zHF
g�T�
�UVW �� YW �Z
� � �il`a���
�.!�lØ`a
����.�Fl
Ø`a����.
/�lØ`a��
���
� �
����7�� �����9���� [D�^Àm`a
����4 ¶�
��
b�d¢RS����������fq -�
�����CDEF39HIJKLMNOPQ
FRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����7X� �����9��9�4 ¦Jîµ�)
<`a�����
�ó !�� cgiLXXe¬� A �� Æì$���
$vëû�½[��?[Î�-��í�?[Î
�aS�CDEFEGHIJALMNOPQF
RST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����7�� �����9��9�ª�� `a��
���
�$gKh�®¥¥�����Ý©-�Ü����$
+W�°2.FG°À2.° !¹2.�¡Ú
ù2.4°0ñ2.4±+ï2.6��¢ 2
.o�£à23A3µ$¯�ë,ÂT[×® �
2Èq�¤ó�Èqde¥¦Ç³â§D¨�
gKh�®¥¥�U�süo�¶÷[+µ�©���@X@�
��ª«-.$gKh�®¥¥�U�süo�¶÷[+
µ�©���@�>� ��ª«-�C��F39HIJ
KLMNOPQFRSB��HI�Ü®¯°�
��¸s�ÜûüVM¹�È·Ë£ÁìUrO
N¶T����$��HPWQùú�ÜþRF�
�UVW X� YW � Z
.W X� Y�
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
-173-
��� ����� ���� ��� � ����� ��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
� � � 6nMqú2c%4.56�qh5FT/¾U
-Aâ+Á쾿�HÇÈÉÊ�W�ÜÁìÌ
ÍFtu�UzHT�
�
����7�� �����9�X7� t¥¬)<��
���
{n|}~�������kc��L�¹£¤
¥��T�
|}~����VW9
YW �Z�
����7@� �����9����®¥§¨`a��
���
�$ªE¯ X-§'��q�µ�°ÎSHÏ3
ÐÑFú½¶�CDEF�ÔM39HIJKL
MNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����7>� �����9������� � � � Ëã
°��äå}¯z�
çèMéêëìíOQßF��îïð�íñò
Qßóô�õö÷ø�äå��Hùúûüý
þ����äå����¦�z��äå��
FL�ó�þz���HÇÈÉÊÁìÌÍF
ÎÏzHT�
�UVW X� Y�
����79� �����9����4 ±²î¿��
���
� ��X2 �Xs 7 Ñ.�Xs �> Ñô �Xs X� Ñb
� �³ æÃ\{²r�RS�CDEF6^H
IJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����7u� �����u��9��4��l�no
`a����.�
^��l�`a�
���.´µ��
l�`a�����
´µ��l�`a����.�4��l�no
`a����ô�^��l�`a����û
ë¼ùûü�<o�UÁìVW > YW � ZW �
ÆFs<ì��í)ùVW �� YW � ZW X Æ
g�Fî�ïð�T�ùVW �� YF � 4Òg
�Fm��¸î�s<Â�î�T�
�UVW �� YW �Z
����77� �����u���� [Df¶����
4 ¶���
{n|}~�������DEEZ���L�
¹£¤¥��T�
|}~����VW9
YW �Z�
������� �����u����·*¸)<���
��
{n|}~���HI�kzH[ØOH��D
��n¹{�V�á�O·Ëº»T�
|}~����VW
�> YW XZ�
������� �����u����¶¼¦)<`a�
����
�HI�Ü®¯°���¸s�ÜûüVM¹�
È·Ë£ÁìUrON¶T����DνF
½,39M�=���ô��HbWjùú�Üþ
RF6nMqú2c%4.56�qh5FT/
¾UA�Üâ+¾¿�HÇÈÉÊ�W�ÜÁì�
�UVW X� Y�
-174-
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
� � � ÌÍFtu�UzHT� �
�����X� �����u�XX�Ú�µ½����
��
¾êq4Ý,X¿ÀØmÁ�ÕëÎÂí{�Ý
, ,���HÇÈÉÊÁìÌÍFÎÏFzH
T�
�UVW X� Y�
������� �����u�X@�Ã�)<�������$+%¦� �¥8> çp+Ä-§'���Å
;lno¦��CDEFEGHIJKLMNO
PQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
������� �����u�Xu� [�Rno`a
�����
{n|}~���HI�kzH[ØOH��D
��n¹{�|�kzH[ØOFV�á�O·
˺»��Ç�M��qT�
|}~����VW
�> YW XZ�
�����@� �����u�Xu�1ȧ¨`a��
���
��$êhFÉ-§'�ó���#FUËÊË
ÌÍaµ$�lÏ-°ÍÎSHÌÏÐÑFú½
¶�CDEF39HIJKLMNOPQFRS
T�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����>� �����u�Xu�Í㧨`a��
���
��$ÎBÏ ��-§'���µ �®.X®.�®.
�®FåÖÐÑ.�4ÎSHÐÏAÏ3ÐÑ�C
DEF�ÔM39HIJKLMNOPQFR
ST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����9� �����7���� 6�WÑ*+úÒ
-(�}D��Ó
�ÅÔL.6�W
Ñ*+úÕÖ(�
Ó�ÅÔL.6�
WÑ*Tú(�¥
/Ó�ÅÔL.6
�WÑ*ÕÖÒ-
(�Ó�ÅÔL�
åK�L<H�O6&�Ýo�n<Å�×6
^��¶Ì¡¢�×FÅÔL�ØÙC|6Ýo
�n±²UùÞ¾MÚÛKHde�ÇÈÉÊ
6�WÒ�ÚÜ FÅÔÚÝ��WX²YZ
[T�
�UVW �� YW �Z
�����u� �����7����*vÞÐ`a��
���
� !��$ æ�Ãß'Ìñà��î�m�
-�C��FstHIJKLMNOPQFRS
T�
�UVW X� YW �Z
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
-175-
��� ����� ���� ��� � ����� ��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
�����7� �����7��7��!�ìÃ`a�
���.����
� � Ë*á)<
oD�
��!Ã|4��$997X�â�Ì�ÁãäåÝ
�æU-DE�����R�Ìç.Áè=]B
æé���¹q�êí��¹��Æ�ë�Tú
Ëæé3Ò�Ì�Bêíãì»úí�êîï°
Ñv<�R�ð�Kñã=]�CDEFEGM
39HIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
������� �����7��7�¦ò�þ� `a
����.����
� � Ë*á)<
oD�
�¦òÃ|4��$óôõö0=<ú÷Ì�4
óäåøùú-DE�����R�4ç.Áè
F=]TÁè5) 7787>:Bæé���¹q�ê
í��¹��K¥ë�TúËæé3Ò�Ì�B
êíãì»úí�êîï°Ñv<�R�ð�K
ñã=]�CDEFEGM39HIJKLMN
OPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
������� �����7�X�� Ú\î`a���
�.ûzDlü¾
¿`a����.
\ýÌî�����
�þ�DE����û gLg)<gt��$�Û
u����� ~î®-.$�Û�� u�~ ��ðð-AB
�CDEFEGHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����X� �����7�X���¢Lo`a��
���
�$�¢� � æ��2-��$�c�Ö�L� �X
��ì �®/Ê�XÊ�-DE����$?[Î�
-�CDEEGHIJKLMNOPQFRST
�UVW X� YW �Z
������� �����7�X@�þ$§¨`a��
���
��$Øû-§'���µ��ÐÑ��°
Í"#� XM��÷aS�CDEF�ÔM3
9HIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
������� �����7�X>�¡���z���
��.��§¨`
a�����
��$��-§'��c�M c�ÊËÌÍMNa
µ�4°ÍÎSHÏ3ÐÑFú½¶�CDEF
39M�ÔHIJALMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����@� ��������>� Ñ�z�§¨�ê
�����
�$Ñ�z� X-§'��µåÖÐÑM�4°
ÍÎSHÏ3ÐÑ�CDEF39M�ÔHIJ
KLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����>� ��������>���§¨������$WI¯Ð-§'��µ�4.ä4.�°
ÍÎSHåÖÃÏ3ÐÑ�CDEF39M�Ô�
�UVW X� YW �Z
-176-
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
� � � HIJKLMNOPQFRST� �
�����9� ��������u�Tú�������Ô�¶O���RSF¦�{�Môf�¾�J
�°¢����â+Á쾿�o��fQßÂ
H��UVwEFÁì�èó�þ��zH�
HÇÈÉÊÁìÌÍFÎÏMtu�UzHT
�UVW X� Y�
�����u� ��������7�-�)< o��
���
{n|}~�������kcM��DE��
�V���£¤¥��T�
|}~����VW9
YW �Z�
�����7� �������X����§¨�������$º�¥�-§'�ó���#FUËÊË
ÌÍaµ$�lÐÑ-°ÍÎSHÌÏÐÑFú
½¶�CDEF39M�ÔHIJKLMNOP
QFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����X�� �������XX���§¨����
.������
��
��$��-§'��c�ÊËÌÍMNaMcX/c9
ÊËÌÍMNaµ�4°ÍM» ÑÎSHÏ
3ÐÑFú½¶�CDEF39M�ÔHIJA
LMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����X�� �������X��!§îl����
.¦ò�þ� `
a�����
��$&i¤h¬fh ¦[*�i ?[*�á£"�#
$-DE�� ö��-#?[Î�aS�C
DEFEGHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����XX� �������X9�%f§¨`a��
���
��$0&Ï-§'�ó���#FÊËMNS
yaµ$��-.$'(Ï-<Å$�4-�ÎS
HÐÏÐÑí��CDEF39M�ÔHIJK
LMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����X�� �������X9�î)§¨�������$î)Ú¦ô-§'��$�÷ÌÍSya
�£df�c-M$�÷ÌÍSya �£df�Ê-�µV�
Ð�.åÖÐÑ.�4.» ÑMÈU4ÎS
HÏ3ÐÑí��CDEF�ÔM39HIJK
LMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����X�� �������X7��Ĭ��no�
����
�HI�Ü®¯°���¸s�ÜûüVM¹�
È·Ë£ÁìUrON¶�����Cük¹
F��.DνF½,39M�=���ô��
HbWjùú�ÜþRqú2c%4.56�qh
�UVW X� Y�
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
-177-
��� ����� ���� ��� � ����� ��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
� � � 5FT/¾UA�Üâ+¾¿�HÇÈÉÊ�W
�ÜÁìÌÍFtu�UzHT�
�
����X@� ���������� ¦§¨`a��
���
��$ ¦*þ-§'���µ iX+ @ �X »
F��M�4ÎSHÏ3ÐÑ�CDEF�ÔM
39HIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����X>� ��������@�,µÑwiÖ`a
�����
�ó !��$gÖdfª�gf��ªc-./À¼q�
×°Úì�Ö-��N¶��UVâ+¾¿�C
DEFEGHNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����X9� ��������>�_0`a������$i8øû� ig1t2�EÝ©2-����$���
�0�Ü -�Có��39HIJKLMNO
PQFRSB��HI�Ü®¯°���¸s�
ÜûüVM¹�È·Ë£ÁìUrON¶T��
���Üük®¯°F��.DνF½,39
ô�=��.}~�øF39ô��.��Hb
Wjùú�ÜþRqú2c%4ô56�qh5
FT/¾U.�ÜûüVMF�kA�Üâ+¾
¿�HÇÈÉÊ�W�ÜÁìÌÍFtu�Uz
HT�
�UVW X� YW � Z
.W X� Y�
����Xu� ��������9� Ñs���`a�
����
� diN�?É�¥6>ú6ÉD23 Ê=6=6=�«=DÉù�gN�û æ
D2"#�}¡���45���ì$ �/�X��
M �/�X�������$=l?[� �¥8�-M
$vë=l?[Î�-�CDEFEGHIJK
LMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����X7� ���������� º�§¨`a��
���
��$ë¤-§'���� �»ÊËUËÌÍM
NaµÏÒÐÑÎSHÐÏÏ3ÐÑFú½¶
�CDEF39M�ÔHIJALMNOPQF
RST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
������� ��������X� ·6�|� `a
�����
{n|}~����7��DEEZ���L�
¹£¤¥��T�
|}~����VW9
YW �Z�
������� ��������X�lè÷|8E��
���
�k�²û�D��÷|�UDEF��stT��UVW �u Y�
-178-
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
�����X� ��������X�Ü9������ �k�²û�D��÷|�UDEF��stT��UVW �u Y�
������� ���������� ^�l¶D�`a
����.:Ò)
<`a�����
��$¥g/7�@�øgN=ûÉ §9_-wE�� ö��
-#$��>�<=>�ùúÉC� ���?ú6øDÉC-aò�CDEF
EGM�ÔHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
������� ����������DEVO6�WK
Sw�sÞ�¥�
��;n¥K&K�k¥Pæ�&��Î �
�qQnoRSTÇÈÉÊUVWXF²YZ[
T�
�UVW �� YW �Z
�����@� �������X���*�)<`a�
����
{n|}~������CL�¹£¤¥��B
����DEEZ��V��B�ô��D¸s
·ËM��qF39�½<V�nZBHI�k
zH[ØOH��DÂ��n¹{�óV�á�
O·Ëº»B��V�������D56�q
F;³;�T�
|}~����VW>
YW �Z.W 9YW �
Z.W �� Y.W �> Y
W X Z.W X� YW X
Z�
�����>� �������X������ �� yólOM�Â�C|}~��noFüo�M
��kc�HIJKLÃNOPQFRSBÈ�
Z'=F��yólOM�Â�C|'=xz�
Ñ.ë�,¸MêÓ.¯AnL�HIJKLÃ
NOPQFRST�
|}~����VW
�� YW XZ.W �X Y
�����9� �������X�� [D/=,`a�
���4 ¶���
{n|}~����7��DEEZ���L�
¹£¤¥��T�
|}~����VW9
YW �Z�
�����u� �����X��@� >�ê`a��
���
�$?ü@-§'��FÊËÌÍMNa�µ�
�`HÏ3í�ÐÑ�CDEF39M�ÔHI
JKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����7� �����X��@���� � � � ËA
B oD�
H��äåÌÍ�Èb�$�� êR¥-M
΢RS�HÏ�¬�ÁìÐ�FñòM�Ѻ
¥�xÂr�DEstHKÁFÒÓ�ÔÈo�
PÕÖñò �î�xz×ØÙ��Úíñò�
æ�yy1*ÛÜFÝà��ÂHÁì&��è
ó�þ��zH�HÇÈÉÊÁìÌÍFÎÏM
tu�UzHT�
�UVW X� Y�
��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
-179-
��� ����� ���� ��� � ����� ��� ����� ���� ��� � �����
������� �����X��7�!§îl����
.¦ò�þ� `
a�����
�?�?�Ã| ��Cþ ����i?["�D
E���$DÐEw8nZ[-�CDEFEG
HIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
������� �����X��7��ÞFF�|�
`a�����
Ô�¶O{n|}~������CL�¹£¤
¥��T�
|}~����VW>
YW �Z�
�����X� �����X���� vw æz�`a
�����
{n|}~������D�GÂ�íóH2K
,���D;³;�F·ËIsT�
|}~����VW
�� YFW ��
������� �����X���� ãYäå�����çèMéêëìíOQßF��îïð�íñò
Qßóô�õö÷ø�äå��Hùúûüý
þ����äå����¦�z��äå��
FL�ó�þz���HÇÈÉÊÁìÌÍF
ÎÏzHT�
�UVW X� Y�
������� �����X��X�J¸iÖ������ æ"#$��K�D=�£=ùúC-°lÖ���CDE
FstHIJALMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����@� �����X��@�������Ë)(
�ÕL oD�
� !��DER�M�Ý,½�CDEFEG
HIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����>� �����X��9�&ò(Nno`a
�����
�éêFl¶(��HKLF���C��FE
GHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����9� �����X��u��F����� ��äå����Ã�9��¦�z��äå
OñPFL�ó�þz���HÇÈÉÊÁìÌ
ÍFÎÏzHT�
�UVW X� Y�
�����u� �����X��u� ¦Q§¨�������$�R-§'���"#lno¦��Mí
�ú^�á�BôSyMNa�CDEFEGM
�ÔHIJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
�����7� �����X��7� Ú\î`a���
��
��KST3UP�9i¬�@ OaQDE�� !
��$U:G���� KST-�CDEF39H
IJKLMNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
����@�� �����X�X��õÐDVW���
��
� !��$Súvë*V.X¢ÇYZD-.$
Súvë*V.ÚX¢ÇYZD-.$33È�¾
U ���:[.õÐD¥P�[\¾U[û]�:
¶�è�^�UV¾U-AB�C��FEGH
IJKLÃNOPQFRST�
�UVW X� YW �Z
-180-
������ ���
List of Merger Not Prohibited
�� 103�
2014
������ 6�� 1�� 1�
�! à ¾! ! Ï! ! �! ! �
103/05/07 _`Lo`a����(��_`��)ôô«l¶`a����(��ô«��)xz<Å�È_`
��HÀ$���ô«���H�a���¤'s<=¸ý+ÉÊFUVWXH$b�c�Mþ
de�¾-WX�õ�Us<ì�T
103/11/12 Àµ`a����Ù®<Åêz�`���Ã\ü¦¹o`a����êzFól`a�<Å9
Àµ���HÀ$���ü¦��µH�a��T
������ 6�� 1�� 2�
�! à ¾! ! Ï! ! �! ! �
103/01/14 ÑD0fl�g�¥D.ÑD0fl�Ú» ,��`a����(�� MELTEC)M4 0fl
`a����s<�0fl�hµ�4 0fl 43.69%F`½.MELTEChµ�4 0fl
6%F`½�s<90fl��/ó¶��MELTECr4 0fl Fµ`) 54.69%T
103/03/05 4 il¼�`a�����íµ�!�lØ`a����(��!�lØ)íêz`aH 32.5�
�Ã\!�lØ 5.5�F`a9�µ�!�lØ�R&½F`a×®0¶Fú�õ�Us<T
103/06/18 hÚvN-}o`a����Ù®óµ� 100%`aFVM o�Ñvµ� Kraton Performance
Polymers,Inc. 50%F`a�s<=¸ý+ÉÊFUVWXH SBCPi\j59�íþ�ç� SBC
QWX�õ�Us<ì�T
103/10/14 4 il¼�`a����Ã\!�lØ`a����íêz`a 5.5��oóµ�!�lØF`
a) 38�T
103/10/15 °\lm`a����Ù®¶��°\)<kö`a����{�lSz�����0¶FúÈ
q³¾��õmus<T
103/12/08 nþl^}o`a����Nxo�� `a����P��o�� Q�wæSN¨��±Ò
ó}æSN[Ø��ßÃo�� �`�µ�Ã{�o�� F`aó¾��)*�R&½
`aþ¤·�0¶FúÈq�õ|pNs<ì�T
������ �� �� �
������ �� �� �
-181-
������ ���
������ �� �� �
������ �� �� �
������ 6�� 1�� 3�
�! à ¾! ! Ï! ! �! ! �
103/02/19 Microsoft Corporation (��Microsoft)ô Nokia Corporation (�� Nokia)H�`aô¾w\©�q
�Microsoft1J Nokia�ÍM��no½ï�Ú½¶üoô¾w�½q|½ïF¨/Er.��
�w¨�Fük.��ôz�RSrsZ[�M|½ï�wwEF���Ý,TNokia µ¼O
Microsoft 102~ÝõÝ,¼½�Microsoftt�µ|¼½ÓÙ �0Fuv½�wMicrosoftµ±
² Nokiawúno½ï HEREo�(6°�aM�°��)FÛ�¼½�õmus<Fì�T
103/04/09 :x¹xÕþlæ`a����P��:x¹xQ1JÒpl¶`a����P��Òpl¶Q
ý+½¶FüoÃyw��zwEWX¸H$�Çá}WX-�õ�Us<��T
103/11/26 4 {å|`a����LÃ4 ãA`a�����V5ê9�}~��D(Thermoplastic
Polyurethane��� TPU)o�M¾w�s<9�4 {å|M4 ãA�HÀ$���õ�Us
<T
������ 6�� 1�� 4�
�! à ¾! ! Ï! ! �! ! �
103/04/03 Ç� 9 Z¡ßK�6/�>�¾w``a����.°\lm`a����.�î�,D2`a
����.� ���`a����.���Dng�¥D.�^)< o`a����.�î
l^`a����ô¦ò wxo�¾`a����A 8 îP�A<�Môs<noQMô�¾
ô¼ùûü§��<z�`a����P��§���Q{,§6o�Fs<�s<9/�>�
w��ô°\lm��<ŵ�§��� 48�`½�õ|pNs<T
103/07/03 y ¾¿`a����.yEVOÛ<m�>��°ÐMyEVO4 à�Á�o�êÓ� ¥
<¾¨*� zSr@`a����ûü $m�����U4PË PSP TSMQ�H|pNs<
ì�T
103/08/26 ¶¼¦)<`a����ôüµîk`a����Cüµ�l��!ÈM»�Ü��ûü¶¼¦
�,D2T
-182-
������ 6�� 1�� 2�5�
�! à ¾! ! Ï! ! �! ! �
103/01/22 °\lm`a����.Û<�`a����ôÛû6°`¶����<¾¨*«��`a��
���¶÷��R&½`a 65%.25% 10%�õ|pNs<ì�T
103/01/22 °)m� �w``a����È`a����{�� OÝ��`a����(��� OÝ
��)�½íêz`a��êÑvwk� OÝ���¶F�µ`F¶��4Ý�w���o�
ûüÃOnà0�õ|pNs<ì�T
103/01/24 $DMerck KGaALà AZ Electronic S.A.íêzF 100%`a�{���$UËtS���ú-
FWX�°�õ|pNs<ì�T
103/02/05 °\lm��M Benefit One Asia Pte. Ltd.��)�*°\mÃ`a����P��°\mÃ��
Q�ûü oP}f,l¶D����°\lm��µ�°\mÃ�� 50%`a�uvÃÑvwk
óo�ûüÃOnà0�õ|pNs<ì�T
103/02/12 °\lm��µ�°\]�� `a����P��°\]���Q51%`a��Â�uvÃÑ
vwkóo�ûüÃOnà0�õ|pNs<ì�T
103/02/19 °\lm`a����Ù®¶���:᧨�ê`a����µ�Ã{�RvKSw`a��
��(��Rv��) 100%`a��ÈuvÃÑvwkRv��Fo�ûüÃOnà0�õ|pN
s<ì�T
103/03/03 Ú\l`a����P��Ú\��Q�µ�4 ��l¶`a����P������Q30%
Fíêz`a6�s<9Ú\���H����uvµ` 100%F����õmus<T
103/03/25 4 ÚóÚ`a����Ù®¶���+(x�ê`a����¾µ� 100%`a��¨�+(x
�É���'`a�����õ|pNs<ì�T
103/05/07 °\�ê �w``a����(��°\�ê w��)Èr@`arsMh rs��{��
-Doõz`a����(���-Doõz)�½`a�s<9�-Doõz�H°\�ê w
����µ`F¶���õ�Us<ì�T
103/05/14 '�`a����.��`a����.�x`a����.[��¾`a����M�î`a
����LÃ4 �E`a�����)*lno�R&½`aþ¤��0¶FúÈq��u
vÃÑvwklnoFo�ûüÃOnà0�õ|pNs<ì�T
103/05/20 MasterCard�Ù®MasterCard Australia{� Pinpoint�½`a�)*lno�R&½`aþ¤
·�0¶FúÈq��uvÃÑvwklnoFo�ûüÃOnà0�H|pNì�T
103/08/27 ���l`a����Ù®����{��Ç�l`a�����½`a��uvÃÑvwkó
o�ûüMOnà0�Môs<noý+üoZn�H6�cê�ÕëþPLEDQ��ñM��
� ¤'Mõ�Us<Fì�T
������ �� �� � � �
������ �� �� � � � �
-183-
������ �� �� � ��! à ¾! ! Ï! ! �! ! �
103/09/10 Ç� 7 Z¡ßK�6Ú¤��l�`a����(��î�OÃÚ¤��){�4 6°����
l�`a����(��46��)100%`a�s<946��µ#$À$��HÚ¤�� 100%
µ�F¶��T
103/09/24 ÑD���Dng�¥D(ITOCHU Corporation){�ÑD�î�,D2g�¥D(FamilyMart Co.,
Ltd.)F`a)ó·`6F 37%�õmus<Fì�T
103/11/26 ���¶6°� `a����(�����¶) Ù®óµ� 100%`aF Gamania International
Holdings Ltd.�LÃ Achieve Made International Ltd.51%F`aTAchieve Made International Ltd.�
µ�ç,6°� `a����(��ç,6°)100%F`aTs<9���¶µÑvµ�ç,6
° 51%F`a��Ñvwkç,6°Fo�ûüMOnà0T
������ 6�� 1�� 2�4�5�
�! à� ¾! ! Ï! ! �! ! �
103/04/02 4 }<N-`a����b��4}��jô¦f� `a����b��¦f� j ¼ù§*ú
<¾��$}!`a����-¶÷µ�<¾�� 9�:M ��:F`a�õ|pNs<ì�T�
103/04/30 4 )<�¡`a����ô��[�`a����<¾�¨4 ß�¢X`a�������
õM�WX�~Kù�¤s<õ|pNs<��T�
103/06/11� ��lm`a����.�£`a����.££Û<z�`a����.����`a���
�.�U¤¥���`a����ô��)<Doõz`a����<¾¼ùûü�§l¶àØ
`a����Ýül¶àØo�T�
������ 6�� 1�� 1�2�4�5�
�! à ¾! ! Ï! ! �! ! �
103/03/26� dN�Dù�6ú<C��h6<8b�� dN�Dù�6ú<Cj.¦�¹x�§`a����b��¦��§j.ÑDÚѤç�g�
¥Db��ÚѤç�jM4 ÚÑç�§� `a����b��4 ÚÑçj�s<�xz¶ X¨
©�¹í¦��§�H dN�Dù�6ú<C Ñvµ� ���:`aFª��BÔ�¦��§ô4 ÚÑçxz
<Å�Ȧ��§HÀ$��.4 ÚÑçH�a����� dN�Dù�6ú<CôÚѤç�¼ùûüT
-184-
������� ���
List of Concerted Action Cases Approved
�� 103�
2014
� � ��103.03.05
î « O�ÚT¬`a����.Tú o`a����.Ú�Ú& o`a����.-\�D}o`a
����.[®`a����
î«nZ�ú.î«O��UÁËVW 15YW 2Zg��î«�:ÙÓ<¡�Ãx¯k°±<ÐHF»ê�
�T
Õ.±<ÐHL��Ñ�æ»ê��í äÙÓ 3²T
»ê39�ú.î«O�î«<¡�Ãx¯k°��� 103² 3s 12Ñ6T¤~î«ÙÓ»ê���³<
�UÁËVW 14YW 1ZW 5ÆMW 15YW 2Zg��¸O»êÙÓ�»ê�� 106²
3s 12Ñ6T
Õ.î«O¸µ¤±<ÐHF´ÐÝò�½<[¡~³x¯OF-µ�ö.L<�ö.�Ã
�¡�M�Ãst.��¡�ÞÑ�M·)�)z¯Ñ��³î«O[sx¯¶.�}¶.
��¶.³À¶A¾¸�¹£Á拉T
0.î«OA�º�¤»ê{n»x¯·¶�k¼�½¶ÌkAól±<ÐH�Ã�kî«OF
úæ�&�ó±<�Ãx¯F½¶�Ã�6î«OFúæÐ�Ãx¯�Ã�ÀÁ:����
ólk°x¯no�G¤±<�ÃT¤±<ÐHýþ¾��S¸�î«O�û¤¥è�T
Ü.î«OA�º��¤»êÂ{�FWX�°�HAÁFst&�.+µÃ�7�Ã�ÄÅl
no�UdeA¿�WX�°Ãól� �UÁËVFÐHT
� � ��103.08.28
î « O��º�k`a����.�º�k`a����.,ñÞk`a����.��Þk`a���
�.�!)<`a����.°Tkî`a����.) Þk`a����.Ü+Þo`a�
���.4 Þo`a����.Úv�k`a����.��Þk`a����.ÀºÞo`
a����.åvÞo`a����
î«nZ�ú.î«OA��$IÀ�VM�üno�¿x¯|¾�kk�»o�V-W 9 Yg�¼ù
�k�VP¿Qx¯|¾�õ�UÁËVW 7Y��±<ÐH��ùVW 14YW 1ZÁ·M
W 15YW 2Zg�<ÐH»êÙÓ 3²T
Õ.�Áî½ßêFÝ¢�¿�$IÀ�VM�üno�¿x¯|¾�kk�»o�V-U
Vg��/�³î«O�kF½âhÂ�gÃÙÄm#�kfT
»ê39�ú.î«OA<k��$IÀ�VM�üno�¿x¯|¾�kk�»o�V-�Ã
FÚ·|¾Mú^Å��³<Á¹�þû�º¬�»ê��æ 103² 9s 29Ñä 106² 9
s 28Ñ6/ 3²T
-185-
������� ��� Õ.î«OAMÁî½ßêFÝ¢�¿A���ól³<$IÀ�VM�üno�¿x¯|¾
�kk�»o�V-F)Æ¡Çk�of�G¤±<ÐHT¤±<ÐHýþ�S¸�¤
¥��T
0.î«OAMÁî½ßêFÝ¢�¿A�º��»ê{�FWX�°�Â�ÄÅlno�Ud
eÃól¿�WX�°FÐHT
Ü.î«OA±<�kIÀ�VM�üno�¿x¯|¾�¸µÝ¢�¿gÃÙÄF)Æ¡
Ço¦ðM�k½âhÂ�¤¥��T
� � ��103.12.25
î « O�fÈ�D`a����.fÝLo`a����.��É|`a����.Tú o`a���
�.-¸ÊË`a����.� ÷Ú�èE}oùo�¥
î«nZ�ú.ÙÓÛ<�Ã<¡x¯Ú�F»ê��T
Õ.Û<zHL��Ñ�æ10421s1Ñä 106212s31Ñ6/32T
»ê39�ú.î«O¹î«Û<�Ã<¡x¯Ú���� 103212s31Ñ�¤~î«ÙÓ»ê���³<
�UÁìVW14YW1ZÁ·W5ÆMW15YW2Zg��¸O»êÓ���� 106 212s31
ÑT
Õ.î«O¸µ¤Û<zHF´zÝò�½<[¡~³x¯OF-µ�Ã^.L<�Ã^.�Ã
�¡�.��z¦�.¡·��zÑ�.æ��z�ÞÑ�.¡·�)z¯Ñ�.�Ãst
.³î«O[sx¯^.��^.³À^A¾U�¹£Á�¤¥T
0.î«OK�,�¤»ê{nólÛ<zH�Ã�kàúî«Oæ�&�óÛ<�Ãx¯F6
^�Ã�6àúî«Oæz�Ãx¯�Ã�ÀÁ�����lno�G¤Û<�ÃT¤Û<
zHýþ�S�¸�û¤¥��T
Ü.î«OK�,��¤»êÂ{�FWX�°�HKÁFst&�.+µÃ���Ã�ÄÅl
no�UdeÃól��WX�°FzHT
-186-
������
Important Measures of FTC
�� 103�
2014
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
1s ú.Ì�W ��@9 ~ W ��>� ~ÍP¥K�`Kî® X� ZK'T�
Õ.de°Ð�
búj �s �� ÑΫ(NÚ-û�-R�-�Ú¼Ý(Ï©$êÓÐrwoôÑËs¿FÉ
ÊÒ� ûÓÇ2S-T�
bÕj �UÁËî¿W @� �%(´³"�¶�³xT�
0.)<n��
�s X� ÑM X7 Ñ7� hi�>M¼}»±�lÔ¥KT�
Ü.ól�
búj �s > Ñ7�ÐI.±½±<��°ÐW �97 ~åV¥�T�
bÕj �s X� Ñ7�ÐI.ÕÖêÓNèÍP¥Ì� ��X²×$�)�Ø�V���°.o�
õ�MUV�V½¢¶}FÕÖ-Í�ÕÖ/Ù�Ú��`�¥T�
b0j �s X� ѳÛÐI.±½±<��°ÐW X>� ~o�¥�T�
bÜj �s X� ÑÌ�$�ܤ¥ ��X²×�Iû=nδÐ�]¥K-T�
�
2s ú.Ì�W ��>� ~ W ��>� ~ÍP¥K�`Kî® X� ZK'T�
Õ.ÕÜnÝ�
Xs X� ÑýSÎÞ°\ñ)u�å¥M4 u�wo}¥��¤¥Ì�Üß$|}~��
�à�¿¨ØM�:�Vá'-W X� Y�V�à�âM²�FL{Î�¥KT�
0.�øRS�
Xs X� Ñ.X� Ñ�¤¥b� ���2c$|}~����V�ø㺥-PW �.XX~QT
Ü.de°Ð�
búj Xs �u ÑΫ°ÀÚ-û�-RÒ �Ú¼Ý(Ï©$Ôä�UÁËV��ZÒWXô
de-T�
bÕj �UÁËî¿W @@ �³"�¶�³xT�
1.)<n��
búj Xs �� Ñôå_deM��fÍP¥C hi�s<æ�æ�/ÙxÐlÔ¥KT�
bÕj Xs �9 Ñ.�u ÑM� hi�>M¼}»±�lÔ¥KMçK}»±�$»èôV.MV�
¼n-lÔ¥KT�
b0j Xs X� Ñ7�$7ô^�û�<»PcdfiQkåV¥K-T�
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
-187-
������
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
bÜj Xs X� Ñ X� ÑéP³Û cdfi$deIMVê±�-M$û�ÍP¥-¥KT�
b1j Xs X� Ñ Xu ÑéP³Û ¥fi�$deÍP¥-=¥T�
1.ól�
búj Xs > ѳÛÐI.±½±<��°ÐW �u� ~åV¥�T�
bÕj Xs �X ÑÌ�¤¥$���à�¿±�-���2W �~¥KT�
b0j Xs X� ѳÛÐI.±½±<��°ÐW X>� ~o�¥�T�
bÜj Xs X> ÑÌ�$�UÁËÍP¥�÷UAÝ'±� ���²W �~¥K-T�
�
3s ú.Ì�W ��>@ ~ W ��>u ~ÍP¥K�`Kî® X� ZK'T�
Õ.ÕÜnÝ�
búj �s > ÑÌ�¤¥$���à�¿±�-���²W X~¥KT�
bÕj �s �� ÑÌ�$ÕDõÐ�¥g�¥P�:ÎERS��FmV�åV¥K-�ôõÐo
ý��Vâ�;ë�:ÍP¥xÐÕDT�
b0j �s X@ Ñ�¤¥b�VkÕÜ¥PW �XQ�ׯH$|}~���:V%ì-M$�U
ÁËVøÀá'ãº-T�
0.�øRS�
búj �s X@ Ñ�:$� z�`a����¼UVzí��oôdeK(�ø㺥-T�
bÕj �s X� Ñ�¤¥b�$|}~��RT�qî»Mó¸ïynZ�ø㺥-T�
b0j �s X� Ñ�6�Wðr±½�÷|}~��noMú^ñò�b�$|}~���:V
ñ�ø㺥-��ò°�6�4óè�ø39T�
bÜj �s �� Ñ��ôWIÀðr�ôW��ñMú^ñò�b�$|}~��Vñg�ãº
¥-T�
Ü.de°Ð�
búj �s � ÑΫ°õÕÖ.Vê-ÕÖ�ç¾øöÕÖPÝ(Ï©$X½Vô�UÁË-T
bÕj �s @ Ñ�÷Ú-¥/R7ôde°Ðb�F�UÁËV}øüT�
1.)<n��
búj �s � Ñôå_deM��fÍP¥C¤¥7ô hi�s<æ�æ�ÝòxÐlÔ¥KT
bÕj �s � Ñ.�� ÑM �u Ѷ÷7� hi�>M¼.ð�ÐHMçK}»±�lÔ¥KT�
b0j �s X@ Ñ Xu ÑéP ù)�¼�7� ¥fi�/ù)I°Ðb�$cú ��þ²¼û�
de'¾)<<»-¥KT�
1.ól�
búj �s > ÑÌ�¤¥$���à�¿±�-���²W X~¥KT�
bÕj �s �� ѳÛÐI.±½±<��°ÐW �u� ~åV¥�T�
b0j �s �� ÑM X� ÑΫIüÚ-yI-RýþñÚ¼©¼$ ��åû�-�ß-ÚÝ}
øׯT�
bÜj �s X� ÑΫÐI.ý/·��ö�Ú[�*¥©¼$3½wkk×æÐæ�M3½�
-188-
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
è»o-T�
b1j �s X� Ñ7�ÐI.±½±<��°ÐW X>X ~o�¥�T�
b1j �s Xu ÑÌ�¤¥$�UÁË£"-��ÍP¥ ���²×W �~��¥KT�
bj � s �� Ñ.� s � Ñ�:¤¥ ��� ²×$��°Ð�OPÝ�©Ô¼�xOP´V}
ø-T�
4s� ú.Ì�W ��>7 ~ W ��9� ~ÍP¥K�`Kî® X@ ZK'T�
Õ.ÕÜnÝ�
� s � ÑýSÎÞ°\ñ)u�å¥M°\ñ)|}~��Doùo�¥��¥�Ì�Õ
Ü$&|}~���à�¿¨ØM�:�Vá'*UVy M§KnZnÝ-¥KT�
0.�øRS�
búj �s �u Ñ��°Wðr|}~��noMú^ñò�b�$|}~��Vñ¼�O¾¸
�àVg�㺥-T�
bÕj �s X� Ñ�6�W�:$¬���ÐHg��ø㺥-T�
b0j � s XX Ñ.X@ ÑM X7 Ѷ÷��ôW.6�WM�°W�:$�UÁËÍP¥r�â
�oFg��ø㺥-T�
Ü.de°Ð�
búj �s �> Ѥ¥l¶�W ��À�rÒêÐT�
bÕj � s X7 ÑΫ� Ú-Ä_ÕÖ�����:Ú¼Ý(Ï©$ÄÜb÷ljdeVUVF
Vê�<-T�
b0j �UÁËî¿W @> �³"�¶�³xT�
1.)<n��
búj �s X Ñ.�ÑM ��Ñ7� hi�>M¼}»±�lÔ¥KM hi�s<}»±�lÔ¥KT
bÕj �s X� Ñ X@ Ñò§�ó����³Û hi� W ��í²¥T�
1.ól�
búj �s 9 ѳÛÐI.±½±<��°ÐW �uX ~åV¥�T�
bÕj �s 9 ÑÌ�¤¥$���à�¿Ý'±�-���²W �~¥KT�
b0j �s �� ÑM �u Ñ�¤¥¾¿Mû�¶ìÏý��ý੼$�UÁËVFû�¶ì÷W
Xx�-ÚÝ}øׯT�
bÜj �s X� ѳÛÐI.±½±<��°ÐW X>� ~o�¥�T�
b1j � s Xu Ñ.X7 Ñ���H�:$¤¥ô��ý��Vo�åV¥�-W �� ~PÐI±
�±�Q¥KT�
�
5s ú.Ì�W ��9� ~ W ��99 ~ÍP¥K�`Kî® X@ ZK'T�
Õ.�øRS�
búj @s 9 Ñ.u Ñ.�� ÑM �7 Ѷ÷ò6�¸�� Ú-.o�� Ú-.°ÀÚ-MÚ
vÚ-�:$�UÁËVô|}~���:V}øü-T� �
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
-189-
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � � � � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
bÕj @s 7 Ñ.�> ÑM X9 Ѷ÷ò4±�NÚ¥÷�²Ú-.o�H�»c�ºD÷êÓå
¥M6�WD¥�Ú��<��°Ð�:$ÁË��ËË -�øRST� �
b0j @s �� Ñ�¤¥b� ���²×Ý(�ø$�UÁËVr±<ÐHF��ø�g�M�¶
'Âãº-T� �
bÜj @ s �@ Ñ.�> ÑM X� Ѷ÷�Ú� ,-..�«Ú-M£àÚ-b�$�UÁËÍ
P¥r�ÚÝ.5F|}~��Vñ�ø㺥-T� �
b1j @s XX Ñ�FGH�:$)ñ°±-Ú�·��ÐHFg�ãº-�ø㺥T� �
b1j @s XX Ñ�6�WF�÷���:$|}~��Vñg�㺥-T� �
bj @s XX M X> Ñ��ôWM�°W�:$Ò-(:ÅÔL¾¿�OFg�ãº�ø㺥
-T� �
bìj @s X� Ñ��°W�:$¬���ÐHg��ø㺥-T� �
0.de°Ð�
búj @s � ÑM X� Ñ�÷Ú-û�-RÞ�M�ôÚ-Vê-RÞ�7ôde°Ð$�UÁ
ËVô|}~���:V}øü-T� �
bÕj @ s X� ÑΫ°�Ú-Vê-R!"#öÚ¼Ý(Ï©$�Ü8qeKô�UÁËV-
T�
b0j $�UÁËî¿-W @> �%(´³"�¶�³xT�
Ü.)<n��
búj @s u ÑéP³Ûû�½)<ÑË�Ì�$«�¥r�)W �~ÑËI��«�¥$·�
OP%!¥K-T�
bÕj @ s XX Ñ�: �dd�ªifd ÚÝ}øRS�Ϋ°\û�ÕÖ.&'ãöÕÖP©¼$
�dd�ªifd FxÓ()ôr�)deIÇy*-T�
b0j @s �� Ñ7� hi�>M¼}»±�lÔ¥KT�
1.ól�
búj @s @ ѳÛÐI.±½±<��°ÐW �u� ~åV¥�T� �
bÕj @s u ѳÛÐI.��f�à�Ì�F$ÕD ���/��@²×��f�à/ÙP+,Q¥
K-T� �
b0j @s �� ÑÌ�$¤¥ ���²×Í�ÕÖ/Ù¹�»o`K¥K-T� �
bÜj @s �> ÑM X� Ñ�:$�UÁËVFû�¶ì÷WX-�×ô��-¿�-ÚÝ}ø×
¯T� �
b1j @s X> ѳÛÐI.±½±<��°ÐW X>� ~o�¥�T�
b1j @s X> ÑÌ�¤¥$���à�¿Ý'±�-���²W �~¥KT�
bj @s X9 ÑÌ�¤¥$3½�è}»±�-W �~¥KT� �
�
6s ú.Ì�W ��9u ~ W ��u� ~ÍP¥K�`Kî® �9 ZK'T�
Õ.ÕÜnÝ�
búj >s � ѳÛzI.ý/·�Ì�F$ÕD&IÀ3½�è¸zïynZbøÀá'j*M
&³�V3½wkkcæzæ���bøÀá'j*-¥KT�
-190-
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
bÕj >s �7 Ñ�¤¥b�$y ¾¿`a����A �� no<¾�¨noûü dgd� �g¬�î
�s<'-.!¥T�
b0j >s �� Ñb�¤¥ ���2cW �~$deV)<êÓM�'ÕÜ}~-T�
0.�øRS�
búj >s � Ñ.�9 ÑM X� Ѷ÷ò��HØqc��.o�H:Ð/Åf,��°ÐMo�
H0üc1z+]ORS°Ð��$Áì��ËË -�øRST�
bÕj >s �� ÑÎÞ�)³�|}~��D}¥�b�$|}~���à�¿¨*M���V
-Ѻ¥T�
b0j >s �� Ñò2�� Ú-��$�UÁìVô|}~����V}~ü-T�
bÜj >s �� Ñ�¤¥b�$|}~��RT�qî»Mó¸ïynZ�øѺ¥-T�
b1j >s X9 Ñ�¤¥b�$|}~��V3¼�O¾U�àVg�Ѻ¥-T�
Ü.de°Ð�
$�UÁìî¿-W @9 �³"�¶�³xT�
1.)<n��
búj >s �X ÑåïÚ-��Ú¼ c>Éo=6ù� � gÉD>ú<ú6úú¹�4¥¤¥��xz´V'¾Á$T
bÕj >s �> Ñ X� ÑéPM�¥fi��deÍP¥=¥T�
b0j >s X� ÑM�>M¼}»±�W X¶�lÔ¥KT�
1.ól�
búj >s @ ÑÌ�Õ�¤¥ ���2c�I/Ùá'¥KT�
bÕj >s 7 ѳÛzI.±½Û<��°ÐW �u� ~åV¥�T�
b0j >s �7 Ñq5Ì�¤¥$3½�è±�-W X~¥KT�
bÜj >s X� Ñ��$wû¾U³RTçy-ÚÝ}~ׯT�
b1j >s X� ѳÛzI.±½Û<��°ÐW X>@ ~o�¥�T�
b1j >s X� ÑÌ�¤¥$�UÁì£"-��ÍP¥ ���2cW X~��¥KT�
bj >s X� ÑΫÄÜde·2�Ûû�-Ýî±�PiNúÉ6�f<�6�?úCD��É=?Qû��' �5CÉ6�
¬�>6=ù�7J8¥Ï©$�Us<Fû�¶ìôL�-�� X@ Ñô¤¥ùn.!T�
bìj >s X� ÑÌ�¤¥$���à�¿Ý'±�-����2W @� ~¥KT�
b�j >s X> ÑÌ�$�UÁìÍP¥�÷UAÝ'±� ���2W X~¥K-T�
�
7s� ú.Ì�W ��uX ~ W ��u> ~ÍP¥K�`Kî® �9 ZK'T�
Õ.ÕÜnÝ�
9�s ��� ÑÌ�$O:��ofr�Ý�M�9��F��2:q�'(-.!¥�ÎÞ°\
ñ)OÝ��Doùo�¥.yEVO��noêÓ°ÐMÝ�ofáR¼ùÜä6:öJ
F�M�9�'(T�
0.�øRS�
9�s �9� Ñ�¤¥b�$�UÁìÍP¥r�ÄØ��zHg��øѺ¥-T�
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
-191-
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � � � � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
� Ü.�de°Ð�
búj 9s � ÑΫ:�Ú-V-.h�xöÚ¼Ý(Ï©$;2ô)<6� wode<='
=>ÜÒÈÛ<zHôs<'=H°Ð-T�
bÕj 9s XX ÑΫ°õÕÖ.V?ÕÖ�@A°ÕÖPÝ(Ï©$V�â��eKFDÎV
ô�UÁìVæì-T�
b0j $�UÁìî¿-°(´W @u� �³"�¶�³xT�
1.�)<n��
búj 9s � ÑÄÜde·2)<VM�I� ��ùBÉ6� ��6D¹�*¥ý©ÄÜdeVgM´V
CàT�
bÕj 9s �@ ÑM�>M¼}»±�W X¶�lÔ¥KT�
1.ól�
búj 9s 9 ѳÛzI.±½Û<��°ÐW �u@� ~åV¥�T�
bÕj 9 s �� Ñ.X� ÑM X> ÑrszI.±½Û<��°Ð®î���$®î&8*��ç
�-RST�
b0j 9s �9 ѳÛzI.�÷UA�Ì�F$zI.�õ�VÙS�÷UAo�_øNèM
¢D/Ù-ÕD¥KT�
bÜj 9s �u ÑÌ�¤¥$���à�¿Ý'±�-���2W >~¥KT�
b1j 9s �u ÑM X@ ÑΫ°ÀÚ-û�-RÒ �Ú¼©¼$�UÁìVFû�¶ìEs<
-ÚÝ}~ׯT�
b1j 9s X� ѳÛzI.±½Û<��°ÐW X>>� ~o�¥�T�
bj 9s X� Ñq5Ì�¤¥$¢���MF���ÙS±�-W XX ~¥KT�
bìj 9s X� ѳÛ)îêÓÍP¥Ì�`�$zI.�õ³�V ���2c�I/Ùá'-W
>X~¥KT�
8s ú.Ì�W ��u9 ~ W ��7� ~ÍP¥K�`Kî® �� ZK'T�
Õ.ÕÜnÝ�
búj us �� ÑÌ�$���2c°õý��V��f�ào�û=Nè-L�Nè¥KT�
bÕj us �� Ñ��$Ú¤��l�`a�����ô4 6°����l�`a����s
<'-.!¥T�
b0j us �@ Ñ�¤¥de°Ð��$)< �Gåô oHVûÓ¶I-.!¥T�
0.�øRS�
búj us �@ ÑM XX Ѷ÷��°WM6�Wb�$�UÁìÍP¥r�ÄØ��zHg��
øѺ¥-T�
bÕj us X� Ñò�±W��ñVJ��å¥��$Áì��ËË -V3�øRST�
b0j us X7 Ñ�6�Wb�$|}~��V3¼�O¾U�àVg�Ѻ¥-T�
Ü.de°Ð�
búj us @ ÑΫ£àÚ-yûV?ÕÖ�δ�öÚ¼Ý(Ï©$��ÁìzH����°
-192-
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
F��'(-T�
bÕj $�UÁìî¿-%(´W @u �³"�¶�³xT�
1.�)<n��
búj us > ÑM�>M¼}»±�W X¶�lÔ¥KT�
bÕj us9ÑΫû�½ûÑ!"áR��ÏkÆX�K�M¤¥OP���dd�ªifd�!"O
PÚÝ}~�©¼$!"L�ûÓ¶I-T�
b0j us �X Ñ[)�4å¥û��Lî&�Ú4¥¤¥ýàÍPT�
bÜj us �9 Ñ �u ÑéPM� cdfi� û�ÍP¥W X� ~¥KT�
1.ól�
búj us � ѳÛzI.±½Û<��°ÐW �u>� ~åV¥�T�
bÕj us u Ñ.�@ ÑM XX ÑΫ°�Ú-yûV?-RÒÖñÚ¼©¼$�UÁìVFû�
¶ìEmuÁì�kzH-ÚÝ}~ׯT�
b0j us �@ Ñ÷�ºýàÍP5Eò�°�ø�Ì�µf¥T�
bÜj us �@ ÑéPM�)îêÓÍP¥b�F$���2czI�VñyV�ÕÔ¥-T�
b1j us �u ѳÛzI.±½Û<��°ÐW X>9 ~o�¥�T�
b1j us X� ÑéPM�)îêÓÍP¥b�F$×NIÀü�=[Fx��MM»V-Ѻ
¥�ÁÑ�b�ûmÕNOPX¢x�T�
bj us X� ÑΫ[)ï¦�'�� iN=ù>ÉC� ªúÉù� cCC�<ú=DÉC� ýÛ�NO7JP�ù8� f>ú5=BÉDN�
Pú=�/ªø�«=6QQ8¥Ï©${û�-pcRÝ,»ê°Çde'(-T�
bìj us Xu ÑÌ�¤¥$���à�¿Ý'±�-���2W 9~¥KT�
9s ú.Ì�W��7�~ W��7@~ÍP¥K�`Kî®��ZK'T�
Õ.ÕÜnÝ�
búj 7s 7 Ñ�¤¥��$øÀ�UÁìÍP¥r�¬���zHFg�Ѻ.!¥-T�
bÕj 7s �� ÑM �u Ñ�¤¥b�$�UÁìVøÀá'Ѻ-VkÕÜ¥PW X�XQT�
0.�øRS�
búj 7s � ÑM 7s X� Ѷ÷��+WM6�W�b�$�UÁìÍP¥r�KL��'¾
F��ôg��øѺ¥-T�
bÕj 7s > Ñò2�HIÀ��$Áì��ËË -V3�øRST� �
b0j 7s �@ Ñò6�nSFî��$Áì��ËË -V3�øRST� �
bÜj 7s �> Ñ��°Wb�$|}~��V3g�Ѻ¥-T� �
b1j 7s �u Ñ��+Wb�$|}~��RT�qî»Mó¸ïynZ�øѺ¥-T� �
b1j 7s X� Ñ��+Wb�)ñ°-$�UÁìV]¶ÚÞÕÔü-T� �
bj 7s X� Ñò6�Wú� Ú-��$�UÁìVô|}~����V}~ü-T� �
bìj 7s X> Ñ��°W��$�UÁìÍP¥r��ÜoýûüzHg�-�øѺ¥T�
b�j 7s �� Ñ�¤¥b��UÁìVÝ(�øRSP�+XW XXQT�
Ü.de°Ð�
búj 7s X ÑΫ°ÀÚ-V?-R¼ÕÖ�T(�Ú¼Ý(Ï©$�UÁìVW� ��� YW� X�
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
-193-
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � � � � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
Zg�m�F>Ü-T�
bÕj 7s X7 ÑIüÚ-V?RÞ�Môde°Ð$�UÁìVô|}�~����V}~ü-
T�
b0j $�UÁìî¿-W @7� �³"�¶�³xT�
bÜj ³´¤¥â+%('=U�W ����¶�³xT�
1.)<n��
búj 7s �� ÑM�>M¼}»±�W X¶�lÔ¥KT�
bÕj 7s �� Ñ X� ÑéPòVJÑ3ä³Û«�¥Ì��)W� �� ~Ñ� ìI�Ü¥KT�
b0j 7s �� Ñ�� hi�>M¼ÕÜ¥WX1¥T�
1.ól�
búj 7s � ѳÛzI.±½Û<��°ÐW �u9 ~åV¥�T�
bÕj 7s � ÑéPM�3I½b�$�ÑV�øѺ¥-T�
b0j 7s � ѳÛzI.��f�à�Ì�F$°õý��V ���/��@2c��f�à�'P
á'Q`�¥KPW �XQ-T�
bÜj 7s � Ñ�ݺHb�$¤¥ô��ý��Vo�åV¥�-W �X ~P��Ú2Q¥K
T�
b1j 7s 7 ÑÌ�¤¥$3½�è±�-W �~¥KT�
b1j 7s �� ѳÛ)îêÓÍP¥Ì�F$ÙS³½¥Y� æMô�k-}»±�W � ~
¥KT�
bj 7s XX ѳÛzI.±½Û<��°ÐW X>u ~o�¥�T�
bìj 7s X> ÑÌ�¤¥$�UÁì£"-��ÍP¥ ���2cW �~��¥KT�
b�j 7s �� ÑÌ�¤¥$���à�¿Ý'±�-���2W u~¥KT� �
10s ú.Ì�W ��7> ~ W ��77 ~ÍP¥K�`Kî® �� ZK'T�
Õ.ÕÜnÝ�
búj ��s > Ñ��$)< �Gåg�ôL�-�ø.!¥T�
bÕj ��s X9 ÑÌ�¤¥$���à�¿Ý'±�-���2W 7~¥KT�
0.�øRS�
búj ��s u Ñòo�Ú�-¯��$Áì��ËË -�øRST�
bÕj ��s �� ÑM �> Ѷ÷òo�Ú-y���RM6�Wú� Ú-y���R��Ú-
.5$�UÁìVô|}~����V}~ü-T�
b0j ��s �9 Ñò�±HDo¥©¼�UÁìVT�
bÜj ��s XX Ñ�FGH��)ñ°-$�UÁìV]¶ÚÞÕÔü-T�
Ü.de°Ð�
búj ��s �� Ñ��(NÚ-V?-RÞ�Mô$�UÁìVô|}~����V}~ü-T
bÕj $�UÁìî¿-%(´W @7 �³"�¶�³xTT�
1.)<n��
-194-
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
búj ��s > Ñ[)�V½ �Gå2ö2Ú ÊùÉ6Dg6KÉù¹�ô%�ôýàÍP¥!T�
bÕj ��s �� ÑM� hi�>M¼}»±�W �¶�lÔ¥KT�
b0j ��s �7 Ñ XX ÑýàÍP5EòѳÛ��ab�F$)<?Þå¥PhÊcQ2¥-M
$W ��í�^deI6�¥K-T�
bÜj ��s X� ÑM� hi� �V�=}»±�lÔ¥KT�
1.ól�
búj �� s > ÑΫ[)�V½ �Gå2ö2Ú ¬ù8ÊùÉùúDg6KÉù ¤¥©¼$[)r�>M
¼'¾FV�ôä<-T�
bÕj ��s �� ѳÛzI.±½Û<��°ÐW �uu ~åV¥�T�
b0j ��s �� ѳÛû�½$���2°\ñ)m�DOuZ`�¥K-T�
bÜj ��s X� ѳÛzI.±½Û<��°ÐW X>7 ~o�¥�T�
b1j ��s X� ÑÌ�¤¥�÷UAÝ'±� ���2W �~¥KT�
b1j ��s X� ÑÌ�¤¥$��þ�ø±�-W �~¥KT�
11s ú.Ì�W �X�� ~ W �X�� ~ÍP¥K�`Kî® XX ZK'T
Õ.ÕÜnÝ�
búj ��s 9 Ñ�¤¥��$�UÁìÍP¥r��ÜoýûüzHFg�Ѻ-øÀá'.
!¥T�
bÕj ��s �� Ñ�¤¥��$�UÁìÍP¥r���l�UVnoFg�Ѻ-øÀá'.
!¥T�
0.�øRS�
búj ��s � Ñ��+Wb�$|}~����ô�à�øѺ¥-T�
bÕj ��s �� Ñò°\ñ)rÒÑìêÓ奩¼$)<deg�-T�
b0j ��s �� Ñ�6�Wb�$�UÁìÍP¥r�ÚÝ.5F|}~��V3�øѺ¥-
T�
bÜj ��s �� Ñ�6�Wb�$���2c�UÁìVR;Ý(©.-6�XT�
b1j ��s �@ ÑòÚ�±[äc\]VJå¥��$Áì��ËË -�øRST�
b1j ��s �u Ñ��+Wb�$|}~��RT�qî»Mó¸ïynZ�øѺ¥-T�
Ü.de°Ð�
búj ��s �u ÑΫ�ZÚ-V?-RÎìxöÚ¼Ý(Ï©$äno^¿lOüom�Fz
H-T�
bÕj ��s Xu Ñb�$W X�ídeIô�UÁìV-,ÕÜ¥-T�
b0j $�UÁìî¿-W >� �°(´³"�¶�³xT�
1.)<n��
búj [)¤�Q=6e�É>>C?Þn��?Þ ��s �� Ñ�¤¥Ï©$[)ô°)Ú_ GåV;2
êÓ-T�
bÕj ��s �� Ñ.�u ÑM� hi�>M¼}»±�lÔ¥KT�
b0j ��s �7 ѳÛW �7í�Ñû�Ñì¥KT�
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
-195-
� � �� � � �� � � �� � � � � � �� � � �� � � �� � � �
bÜj ��s X� Ñbz�ÑdeVý��V}»}2¥KT�
1.ól�
búj ��s � ѳÛzI.±½Û<��°ÐW �u7 ~åV¥�T�
bÕj ��s X� ÑÌ�¤¥$3½�è±�-W �~¥KT�
b0j ��s X� ѳÛÒÁ½MzI.�÷UA�¼ùÌ�F$zI.�÷UA¥)<M�¼M
ô�W u~¥K-T�
bÜj ��s X� ѳÛzI.±½Û<��°ÐW X9� ~o�¥�T�
12s ú.Ì�W �X�� ~ W �X�u ~ÍP¥K�`Kî® X� ZK'T�
Õ.ÕÜnÝ�
búj �Xs � Ñb�$|}~���à�¿¨*.k»ML�Î�.!¥-T�
bÕj �Xs �@ Ñ��¤¥ ���2cW X~$deV)<êÓM�'ÕÜ}~-T�
b0j �Xs X� ÑÌ�$)3iÖ�9+øFhàôdeK(-.!¥T�
0.de°Ð�
búj �Xs �> ÑΫ� � Ú-¾¿��R`&�Ú¼Ý(Ï©$�çôdeØ-T�
bÕj �Xs �u Ñ��:�Ú-�¿��-RÞ�Mô$�UÁìVô|}~����V}~ü
-T�
b0j $�UÁìî¿-%(´W >� �³"�¶�³xT�
Ü.)<n��
búj �Xs � Ñ X ÑéP çc�$#M�$X���2 hi�s<ÕÜ¥-T�
bÕj �Xs �@ Ñ �u ÑéP³Û ¥fi�$deÍP¥-=¥T�
1.ól�
búj �Xs � ÑM �u Ѷ÷éPM�zI.��f�à�Ì�F$ÕD&zI�Vr��f�
àEþFabnÝ*¥K-M$���2c�)��f�ào��Ü¥-T�
bÕj �Xs �> ÑÌ�¤¥$���à�¿Ý'±�-���2W �� ~¥KT�
b0j �Xs �u Ñ��¤¥ ���2c³ZzI¾¿"-zI.��»o©ÔT�
bÜj �Xs �7 Ñ��$deVFû�¶ì�VL�Ï~-ÚÝ}~ׯT�
b1j �Xs X� ÑÌ�¤¥$�UÁì£"-��ÍP¥ ���2cW �~��¥KT�
�
���� ������
���� 103 ������
��������� ����
� � ����
�� � ������ !" 2# 2$ 12%
&� � �http://www.ftc.gov.tw
'� � ((02)2351-7588
��)*104) 4*
+,)*82) 3*
- .250/
0�1� 2� �
3456789��
� � � � � � ��:;<� ���78 =;> $ : %� � � '(?;=@�=A:BC;=;D�
E�FGHI�
� � � � � � � � � � ��<;;� �J�JK L$� � '(?;<@===LC;MM;�
STATISTICAL YEARBOOK OF FAIR TRADE COMMISSION 2014
Publisher:FAIR TRADE COMMISSION
Address:12th F1., 2-2 Chi-Nan Rd. Sec. 1,
Taipei, Taiwan,
Republic of China
Web Site:http://www.ftc.gov.tw
Telephone No.:(02)2351-7588
Printed on:April 2015
GPN:2008200019
ISSN:1027-6041
NOPQRCSTUVCWXYZ[\]^_ =`A �a��
bcZdN+e ff[#\]ghijklSmnoWXYZpQRcZ�O
P#^qrisnebcZt�