sqr-003 rev m rev 1 - vought · nonconformance reference handbook for suppliers sqr-003 revision...

NONCONFORMANCE REFERENCE HANDBOOK FOR SUPPLIERS

SQR-003

Revision Date: 30 September 2014

Approved David Copeland, Manager

Supply Chain Quality

Suppliers may view this document via the Internet at: http://www.Voughtaircraft.com/suppliers/

To obtain a hard copy, please notify Triumph Aerostructures - Vought Aircraft Division

Procurement Representative.

Nonconformance Reference Handbook for Suppliers

Rev. M, 30 September, 2014

2

REVISION RECORD

The latest issue of this manual may be confirmed by viewing the “Suppliers” web site (address shown on the cover).

Revision Date Revision Date Revision Date

Rev. A 25 July, 1997

Rev. B 12 April, 1999

Rev. C 18 Jan, 2000

Rev D 17 Feb, 2003

Rev E 22 June, 2005

Rev F 24 Feb, 2006

Rev G 16 Jan, 2008

Rev H 1 Dec, 2008

Rev I 22 Nov, 2010

Rev J 23 Feb, 2011

Rev K 15 June, 2011

Rev L 26 Oct, 2011

Rev M 30 Sep, 2014

The following is for Vought internal use only:

The information contained in SQR-003 is controlled by the owner listed in the signature sign-off block and is linked to applicable command media. The owner is responsible for the integrity and maintenance of the SQR PROPRIETARY RIGHTS Triumph Aerostructures - Vought Aircraft Division proprietary rights are retained for the information contained herein. The recipient, by acceptance of this document, agrees that neither this document nor the information contained herein, nor any part thereof shall be reproduced or transferred to any other document, used or disclosed to others for any purpose, except as specifically authorized in writing by Triumph Aerostructures - Vought Aircraft Division Employees of Triumph Aerostructures - Vought Aircraft Division may reproduce information contained in this document for internal purposes as necessary. All such copies must be prominently identified as “REFERENCE ONLY” and/ or ”UNCONTROLLED COPY.”



3

Revision M, Summary of Current Changes: 3.0 Nonconforming Material

Supplier-Responsible Nonconformance Cost Recovery

At the discretion of TA-VAD, suppliers may be subject to charges for recovery of costs associated with any/ all supplier responsible nonconforming parts/ materials



4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Title Page

Cover sheet 1

Revision Record 2

Summary of Changes 3

Table of Contents 4

1.0 Nonconformance Report 5

1.1 Purpose 5

1.2 General Information for Suppliers 5

1.3 Electronic SMRR 5

1.4 Superseding a Supplier SMRR 7

2.0 Positive Cause and Corrective Action Guidelines 8

2.1 Introduction 8

2.2 Back to Basics 8

2.3 Corrective Action Response Guidelines 11

3.0 Supplier – Responsible Nonconformance Cost Recovery

12

3.1 Introduction 12

Attachment Title Page

1 Example of Satisfactory Corrective Action Response 14

2 Example of Corrective Action Response form emailed to the

supplier

15

3 Example of acceptable SMRR discrepancy text 18



5

NONCONFORMANCE REFERENCE HANDBOOK FOR SUPPLIERS

1.0 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 1.1 Purpose To provide direction to suppliers for documenting nonconformance’s to either engineering drawing or purchase order requirements that require Triumph Aerostructures - Vought Aircraft Division (Vought) engineering liaison and/or manufacturing engineering liaison disposition. Vought reserves the right to refuse MRB action on a nonconformance. Supplier compliance with these instructions by no means guarantees Material Review Board action for discrepant product. 1.2 General Information for Supplier

If Triumph Aerostructures - Vought Aircraft Division Furnished Material is found to be defective, the supplier shall contact (using SIR form) the cognizant Procurement group for instruction on how to handle the NONCONFORMING material prior to further machining, processing or assembly. 1.3 Electronic SMRR Nonconformances shall be submitted to Vought via the SMRR (Supplier Material Review Record) system which is located on the Vought Supplier Web Site at http://www.Vought.com/suppliers/ on the Quality Tab. . Usage instructions are also available in the same location. Note: When including attachments please ensure that each respective attachment contains the SMRR number that it is associated with. Form 27-910E can be used in the event of internet service interruption. The Supplier’s Quality Assurance Organization initiates Form 27-910E Supplier Withholding Tag (SWT) to request Vought disposition on nonconforming items manufactured/procured for Vought. When additional space is required to complete any of the blocks or to report multiple nonconformance’s, indicate so by entering the words “see continuation sheet” and use Block 36, Continuation. As many continuation sheets may be used as necessary. If necessary, drawings, sketches or other relevant information may be included as attachments to form. When attachments are included, please ensure that the attachments include the SMRR number that it is associated with. Contact the Vought Buyer for information on where to send SWT’s.



6

General 1. Elements that must be present in every description of a non-conformance:

A. State the drawing dimension and/or specification violation affected by the non-conformance.

B. Include the drawing revision letter, zone location and the drawing sheet C. Number of the affected area. D. Give the actual measurement (IS Condition) vs. drawing dimension (S/B

Condition) including tolerance, rather than the over or under tolerance amount.

E. State size and location of defect using a drawing feature as the starting point.

F. When many parts are involved with the discrepancy having a significant range of values from part to part, list the measurement for each part. Note: where only a range is stated, engineering must apply the worse condition to all parts.

2. Additional items to include, but not limited to typical discrepancies:

A. Oversize fastener holes a. fastener callout from drawing b. measured edge margin of all parts (distance from centerline of hole to edge of part) c. measured center to center distance to adjacent fasteners d. measured material thickness B. Undercuts a. measured minimum material thickness b. state which side had the missing material c. measured thickness of adjacent unaffected area d. heat treat condition e. application of finishes – anodize, cad plate, prime, etc. f. application of shot peen, if required by drawing C. Oversize holes other than fasteners

a. give part number of component that installs in hole when shown on drawing b. state if the installation of component is at your facility

c. give remaining wall thickness when hole is near end of part (use freehand sketch)

d. state heat treat condition of part e. state condition of finish – shot peen, anodize, cad plate, etc.



7

1. Examples of acceptable SMRR Discrepancy text templates are located in Attachment 3. The templates were develop for the following reasons:

a. Reduce the amount of the returns for missing or inadequate information b. Standardization to make it easier to find the pertinent data c. Formatting to make it easier to read in the system

2. Corrective Action

Root cause and immediate corrective action are mandatory for each

supplier responsibility defect noted. Root Cause Correction, Verification and Follow-Up should be documented in accordance with supplier’s internal procedures unless otherwise stipulated by Vought.

1.4 SUPERSEDING A SUPPLIER SMRR This outlines Quality Assurance’s responsibilities for superseding a SMRR with another SMRR when the original SMRR has been processed through Material Review. NOTE: ALL SUPERSEDING SMRR’S MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE ORIGINAL VOUGHT MRB DISPOSITIONING SITE! A new SMRR is required under the following conditions: 1. When repair is complete but the hardware (one or more squawks) remains

unacceptable to QA per Engineering disposition and the hardware cannot be reworked to the disposition.

2. When the original SMRR is lost after processing has begun. 3. When the manufacturer is unable to implement the disposition and requests an

alternate disposition before work is started. 4. When repair work is stopped because the manufacturer is unable to finish

implementing the disposition per engineering requirements, a new disposition shall be requested prior to completion.

5. When the discrepancy is inaccurately stated and Material Review/customer

has already accepted the SMRR. 6. The following is applied in the nonconformance, “This SMRR supersedes

SMRR ____”. Follow this statement with a description of the discrepancy. The superseded NR is required to have the superseding NR number cross-referenced.

SECTION 2.0 - POSITIVE CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION GUIDELINES



8

2.1 Introduction Listed below are guidelines for positive cause and corrective action. This is meant only as a guide to assist the responsible personnel in documenting adequate corrective action. Corrective action requirements are established by government and/or customer contract specification, which in turn Vought is required to flow down to, and must be complied with by ’its subcontractors. It must be stressed that only positive corrective action be implemented and submitted. Vought or our customers will not accept meaningless statements. The examples are not to be used verbatim and are presented as a guide. The acceptance of nonconforming hardware is a prerogative of and shall be as prescribed by the customer. The supplier shall establish and maintain documented procedures for implementing corrective and preventive action. The supplier shall implement and record any changes to the documented procedures resulting from corrective and preventive action. 2.2 BACK TO BASICS CORRECTIVE ACTION The procedure for corrective action shall include:

a) The effective handling of customer complaints and reports of product

nonconformities. b) Investigation of the cause of nonconformities relating to product, process

or quality system, and recording the results of the investigation. c) Determination of the corrective action needed to eliminate the cause of

nonconformities. d) Application of controls to ensure that corrective action is taken and that it

is effective. e) Flow down of the corrective action requirement to a subcontractor, when it

is determined that the root cause of a nonconformance is the responsibility of the subcontractor.

I. Flow Charts



9

The supplier shall develop procedures or flow charts that show how the supplier takes corrective action for both Vought and supplier identified nonconformances. II. Corrective Action Response Format: The supplier shall document corrective action in response to Vought corrective action requests using the guidelines listed below and the format shown in Attachment 1. III. Preventive Action The procedures for preventive action shall include:

a) the use of appropriate sources of information such as processes and

work operations which affect product quality, concessions, audit results, quality records, service reports and customer complaints to detect, analyze and eliminate potential causes of nonconformance’s;

b) determination of the steps needed to deal with any problems requiring preventive action;

c) initiation of preventive action and application of controls to ensure that it is effective;

d) ensuring that relevant information on actions taken is submitted for management review.

IV. Effective Corrective Action Requires:

a) The transfer of responsibility back to Vought when the supplier

lacks the authority necessary to implement effective corrective action. If the discrepancy noted on the NR was not caused by you, contact your buyer to negotiate the charge removal.

b) Corrective action closure. Statements such as Tool Order Released, or ELR to be submitted, do not provide closure and there is no assurance at this point that the corrective action will be effective.

c) Assurance that there will be no further occurrence of the error. Statements such as “Personnel to Monitor” must always be supported by some action taken to correct the problem, such as Planning clarified, Tooling repaired, or some other change to the process that addresses the “Root Cause”.

d) That the “Root Cause” has been determined when a Dwg. Or Spec, change were not incorporated. When a Dwg. Or Spec. Change were not incorporated, the “Root Cause” usually has to do with a failing in the Change Incorporation Process. Statements that refer to instructing line personnel after the fact, do nothing to prevent the same thing from happening another place another time. The Change Incorporation Process needs fool proofing in these cases.



10

e) That the corrective action comes from the process owner. The old saying that you cannot inspect quality in, you have to build it in, is very meaningful here. Quality Engineers and or Corrective Action personnel cannot implement the corrective action; it has to come from the owner of the process that caused the error. The process owner or his/her immediate manager must sign for the corrective action.

f) That errors attributed to Sub-Contractors receive Root Cause

investigation and effective corrective action and closure from the Sub-Contractor. The Sub-Contractor is the Process Owner. Suppliers must institute follow-up action to ensure that the C/A implemented by the Sub-Contractor is in fact effective. This should include on site review at the Sub-Contractor if the C/A results cannot be determined by Receiving Inspection at the Supplier.

g) Those items written off as “Isolated Case” are in fact isolated as

determined by a search of non-conformance records for similar problems. Many so called “Isolated Cases”, are in fact intermittent cases, that reappear because the earlier attempts at corrective action did not identify the Root Cause. Intermittent problems should be put on a “Check Order” and maintained there until the “Root Cause” is determined and corrective action implemented.

h) That error attributed to incorrect processing of work requiring

“Certified” Operations and/ or Inspectors address the Training/Certification process. Remember you trained and then certified the Operator/Inspector. If they failed to perform then your certification process certainly failed.

i) That errors attributed to the misused of accountable tools, result in

the Tool being fool proofed. When operators mislocated tools, then the Tool Design should be immediately questioned. This type of problem is almost certain to become “Intermittent” if you don’t fix the tool so that the next new operator can’t make the same mistake.

j) That the corrective action statement focuses on what actually

caused the error and what action was taken to ensure that is does not happen again. Statements that focus on the real root cause of the defect not just the error itself and immediate action to prevent recurrence.

2.3 CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE GUIDELINES



11

Immediate Correction: Specific immediate action taken to correct the identified noncompliance. The response shall address when, where, and how the correction will be made for the short term. Also, potential ramifications shall be investigated and dealt with regarding other affected parts. e.g., "have other parts been manufactured/ shipped with this defect". Root Cause: The source or origin of the noncompliance, as well as any contributing factors involved. The finding is generally a symptom of a root cause. This section documents the supplier's analysis of the finding to determine the root cause of the problem. Adequate analysis/investigation is required for supporting the root cause determination. There are several standard analysis tools that assist the investigator in determining root cause, e.g., fish bone diagram, 5 why’s, etc…. Root Cause Correction: The remedial action implemented to preclude recurrence. This response as a minimum shall address the specific changes to the process (procedures; training; documentation, etc.) for long-term prevention and process improvement. Corrective Action Verification: A plan to ensure the Root Cause Correction has been implemented. This plan shall address all elements (who; where; when; how) for verification of the root cause correction implementation. Follow up: Subsequent action to ensure the committed correction is effective. Vought suppliers are required to individually address each of the above corrective action elements when responding to all requests for corrective action (SCAR, SCARTS, SQSR, SMRR, MESNC, NR, System/Product Audits, etc.), using the definition/description provided as a guide. Adequate data/information shall be provided as necessary to support the responses. SCARTS - Vought has implemented a new corrective action system - SCARTS (Supplier Corrective Action Response Tracking System). All SQSR’s and Systems/Product Audit findings will be recorded in SCARTS and emailed to the supplier’s point of contact with instructions. Supplier will be required to submit the corrective action response via the Supplier Portal. Please see Attachment 2 for example of Corrective Action Response form emailed to the supplier. SECTION 3.0 – SUPPLIER RESPONSIBLE NONCONFORMANCE COST



12

RECOVERY

3.1 Introduction At the discretion of TA-VAD, suppliers may be subject to charges for recovery of costs associated with any/ all supplier responsible nonconforming parts/ materials. The costs are associated with administration, handling and rework of supplier poor quality. Cost recovery does not include nonconfomances caused by engineering, build package or customer issues. The Cause Code is assigned by Triumph Quality Engineering.

Such charges will be divided into the following categories :

Category Description V1 SMRR-PRA Minor issue V2 SMRR-MRB Minor issue V3 Triumph generated PRA V4 Triumph generated MRB V5 Triumph generated MRB/DTA V6 Triumph generated Major issue

NOTE: The value of each category is defined in SQAR section 2.4.

Category V1 - A Supplier Material Review Report (SMRR) representing a nonconformance generated within the supplier’s QMS and disposition with Preliminary Review Authority (PRA). A PRA disposition is performed by a Quality Engineer who was granted PRA authority by the Customer for that program.

Category V2 - A Supplier Material Review Report (SMRR) representing a nonconformance generated within the supplier’s QMS and disposition with Material Review Board Authority (MRB). A MRB disposition is performed by a Quality Engineer and a Liaison Engineer who were granted MRB authority by the Customer for that program.

Category V3 - A Triumph generated nonconformance tag that is assigned to a supplier as an escape. A PRA disposition is performed by a Quality Engineer who was granted PRA authority by the Customer for that program.

Category V4 - A Triumph generated nonconformance tag that is assigned to a supplier as an escape. A MRB disposition is performed by a Quality Engineer and a Liaison Engineer who were granted MRB authority by the Customer for that program.

Category V5 - A Triumph generated nonconformance tag that is assigned to a supplier as an escape. A MRB disposition is performed by a Quality Engineer and a Liaison Engineer who were granted MRB authority by the Customer for that



13

program. Due to the severity of the escape an additional analysis must be performed due to Damage Tolerance Assessment (DTA). The additional assessment may involve more detailed coordination with Stress Engineering and/ or Customer Engineering.

Category V6 - A Triumph generated nonconformance tag that is assigned to a supplier as an escape. A “to be determined” rework charge for each part/ material which require additional charges above and beyond those identified in V1 through V5.

1. Additional charges may apply where supplied parts/ materials require extraordinary rework at Triumph or its Customer, e.g., an assembly needing to be disassembled, part removed and replaced due to bad part/ material, etc. (amount as determined by actual rework cost).

2. Additional charges may also apply where parts or materials Triumph and/ or its Customer; require scrapping at the supplier as a result of the suppliers actions (amount to be determined by scrap cost.



14

Attachment 1: EXAMPLE OF SATISFACTORY CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE To: TRIUMPH AEROSTRUCTURES - VOUGHT AIRCRAFT DIVISION Subject: Corrective Action Response Ref.: (List Rejection Document Number) This memo contains our review and corrective action for the conditions noted in the ref. report. VOUGHT FINDING Parts were assembled with an unacceptable fiberglass ply (BMS-79 Type 1581 instead of BMS 8-79 Type 120). Ref. (document) for P/N 65B05751-016. (Supplier) RESPONSE Immediate Correction: All parts that contained the non-specified glass fiber material were rejected and presented to a Materials Review Board (MRB) for disposition. The parts were dispositioned as “Structurally and Functionally Satisfactory” by Engineering. Root Cause: A Planner changed the material on four individual part numbers. The original Request to Engineering (RTE) asked for the material change on four part numbers. Three of four drawings worked by the planner had ADCN’s released to cover the material change; however the fourth had not yet been received. The Planner erred by changing the fourth manufacturing plan prior to receipt of the ADCN. Root Cause Correction: Production Engineering management concluded that the error was isolated to the planner and parts noted. To preclude a recurrence, all floor-planning personnel were formally instructed, on how to perform a thorough technical evaluation of shop requests prior to implementing any changes to existing work instructions. Training was completed on Oct. 15th 2002 and records of the personnel trained are on file. Corrective Action Verification: The monthly self-audit plan in the Production Engineering - Composites function has been modified to require a sample of floor planning changes be audited to assure that unauthorized changes are not being made to work instructions. This self-audit was put into place on November 1, 2002.



15

Follow-Up: Supplier's Quality Assurance will perform an independent audit follow-up within 90 days from November 1, 2002 to verify that committed corrective actions have been implemented and are effective. Delta first article will be performed on next production run to validate process changes made and verify that the product meets engineering specifications. The supplier's QA department then certifies that the work has been satisfactorily performed by inspection stamping and dating each of the inspection points on the rejection document. Attachment 2: EXAMPLE OF CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSE FORM EMAILED TO THE SUPPLIER



16

Recommended Disposition: The supplier may submit a recommended disposition as an attachment with the rejection document for MRB consideration Rejection Document Close Out - All rejection documents, no matter what the origin or nature, shall be returned to the appropriate site for final close out even if tag has been accepted, canceled, or suspended. It is the supplier's responsibility to ensure that all rejection documents are forwarded to the appropriate site for close out, and that any part shipped to Vought has a copy of the N/R with the data package. NOTE: In circumstances where special instructions or rework will be accomplished by Vought, the part must be stamped in permanent ink with the applicable N/R number (when required by the disposition instructions), if the product is exterior skin quality identification shall be on the interior surface. Rejection Document Close Out for Rework/Repair- When a disposition of Rework/Repair is given, the supplier’s QA department certifies that the work has been satisfactorily performed by inspection stamping and dating the rejection document. If the product has been dispositioned by Vought as “Return to Supplier/Vendor” non-conforming product may have been identified with the N/R number. If the N/R number is still visible after the parts have been reworked per the disposition instructions, the supplier’s QA department signifies the work has been satisfactorily accomplished by interlocking their inspection stamp with the N/R number on the part. Where a MRR (Hawthorne Facility only) is involved, the disposition instructions will instruct the supplier in regards to identification requirements. IF THE SUPPLIER IS SCHEDULED FOR SOURCE INSPECTION, the parts/material, the rejection document and any other documentation normally required must be furnished to the Vought Aircraft Industries Supplier Quality Representative. After passing final inspection, the Vought Supplier Quality Representative will place an inspection stamp and date the rejection document to verify compliance with the MRB action. IF THE SUPPLIER CURRENTLY HOLDS A VOUGHT INSPECTION DELEGATION OR THE ORDER REQUIRES RECEIVING INSPECTION, submit a stamped copy of the completed rejection document with all normally required documentation. NOTE: In all cases the Supplier Packing Sheet must be annotated with the rejection document number and a copy of the Supplier/Vought accepted rejection document must accompany the shipment along with normal documentation.



17

Closeout for Not Acceptable to Engineering (Scrap): When a rejection document has been dispositioned as unacceptable to Engineering for use at Vought (scrap), the parts must be processed in a timely manner through the supplier's own nonconforming material system. Records shall be available to the Vought QA Representative for review to ensure permanent removal from production and/or destruction of product. Change of Disposition: If the supplier disagrees with the disposition, an alternate disposition may be requested by submitting a new SMRR, referencing the previous nonconformance report. NOTE: The supplier shall report any scrappage of parts/material that has been dispositioned repair/rework to the affected Site for document close out. Special Installation Dispositions: Product dispositioned as Special Installation (i.e., open rejection tag) requires special handling. Each piece of product dispositioned Special Installation must be individually identified with a RED tag containing the nonconformance number, Supplier Name and Vought supplier’s code. Special Installation disposition product will be individually packaged. Additionally, obtain, complete, and attach to the packing/invoice slip Vought Form CD-4020B. The form can be down loaded from the following Website: http://www.Vought.com/suppliers/ Note: the form has a red border and large red text displayed diagonally across the form, therefore the form must be printed in color versus black and white.



18

Attachment 3: EXAMPLE OF ACCEPTABLE SMRR DISCREPANCY TEXT

Table of Contents

Click on Topic below to jump to section. The associated Defect Code is in Brackets [xx].

General Instructions: .............................................................................................................. 19

Template Usage: .................................................................................................................... 19

Some Defect Code Clarifications: ........................................................................................ 19

Recommendations to Facilitate Dispositioning the WT: ................................................... 19

Hole Preparation Defects: ...................................................................................................... 20

Oversized Hole(s), True and Round, – [OH] ...................................................................... 20

Deep Countersink & Excessive Fillet Relief (Deburr) – [CW] .......................................... 20

Double Drilled Hole – [DD] .................................................................................................... 21

Fastener Defects: ..................................................................................................................... 21

Fastener Flushness – [FF] .................................................................................................... 22

Damaged Fastener – [DF] .................................................................................................... 22

Fit Defects: ................................................................................................................................. 22

Gaps – [GP] ............................................................................................................................. 22

Interference / Riding Condition – [IN] .................................................................................. 23

Damage Defects: ...................................................................................................................... 23

Scratches / Scored – [PS] ..................................................................................................... 23

Bonding Defects: ...................................................................................................................... 24

Delamination – [DO] ............................................................................................................... 24



19

General Instructions:

Template Usage: 1. To use the templates, revise the text shown in red and then copy and paste

into SMRR. 2. For multiple instances of a defect (like holes), copy and paste the “IS” condition

for each instance and revise accordingly. Some Defect Code Clarifications: 1. A Double Drilled Hole [DD] is a variation of an Elongated or Oversized Hole

where the separation is sufficient to measure two distinct true and round holes that break into one another and are drilled through the entire Part thickness or stack-up.

2. A Drill Start [DR] is a partially drilled hole that does NOT penetrate the entire

Part thickness. If it breaks into an adjacent hole, it is still a Drill Start. 3. A Mislocated or Mismatched Hole [MH] is a condition where the hole is not

located per the IRM/ARM and the closest hole in the correct location has NOT been opened in the same Part (it could be opened in the mating Part). The mismatch is the distance from the nominal hole centerline (or the mating hole CL) to the defect hole centerline.

4. An Extra Hole [EO] is a variation of the mislocated hole where the nominal

hole and the defect hole are opened in the same Part and do NOT break into one another.

5. A Misaligned Hole is a hole with excessive angularity and uses defect code

[AK]. 6. A hole or countersink with fiber breakout around its periphery should use defect

code [FB]. Recommendations to Facilitate Dispositioning the WT:



20

1. PRA NDI Requirement: For all CFRP damage (scratches / gouges / delaminations/ fiber breakout) a PRA disposition must be issued for an NDI prior to engineering evaluation. The NDI results must be attached as a document for the engineer to evaluate, and a statement should be added to the discrepancy that summarizes the NDI results.

2. Include Attachments: For all nonconformances, a clear picture/ image should

be attached in order for the engineer to visually locate and evaluate the nonconformance. The photo should be clear enough so that the engineer can identify the nonconformance location easily. These should include both, hole charts/diagrams and actual photographs of the discrepancy.

3. Abbreviations: Use only approved abbreviations and acronyms found in either

the comprehensive D6-36168, “BCAG – Everett, Acronyms and Abbreviations” or BDS-3010, “Abbreviations”. If an abbreviation is not found for a specific word, then spell out the entire word.

Hole Preparation Defects: Oversized Hole(s), True and Round, – [OH] >>> GENERAL: --- Oversized Hole(s) --- LOCATION: --- STA: xxxx --- STR: xxL --- X= xxxx.xxx, Y= xxxx.xxx, Z= xxxx.xxx Number of discrepant holes: xxx, --- >>> IS: --- Hole(s) is/are true and round to xxx/xxx (in) Diameter through the entire Part stack-up referenced below. --- Pitch Distance to the adjacent hole is xxx (in). --- Edge margin to the closest edge of the Part name is xxx (in). --- >>> S/B: --- Hole(s) should be xxx/xxx (in) Diameter for a Pin/Bolt and Collar/Nut per BAC xxxx-x. >>> REFERENCE: --- Affected Parts: --- Part name, number, material, and thickness, --- *** See Attachment’s *** >>> QA contact: Name and Phone # Deep Countersink & Excessive Fillet Relief (Deburr) – [CW] >>> GENERAL: --- Excessive Deburr --- LOCATION: --- STA: xxxx --- STR: xxL --- X= xxxx.xxx, Y= xxxx.xxx, Z= xxxx.xxx



21

Number of discrepant holes: xxx, --- Hole #1 >>> S/B - Should Be Condition: >>> IS- Current Condition Nominal hole Diameter (in): xxxx/xxxx Diameter (in): xxxx/xxxx Nominal Fastener callout: xxxxxxxxxx Edge Margin (in): xxxx Nominal Fillet relief radius: xxxxxxxxxx Actual Fillet relief radius: xxxxxxxxxx >>> REFERENCE: --- Affected Parts: --- Part name, number, material, and thickness, --- *** See Attachment’s *** >>> QA contact: Name and Phone # Double Drilled Hole – [DD] >>> GENERAL: --- Double Drilled Hole --- LOCATION: --- STA: xxxx --- STR: xxL --- X= xxxx.xxx, Y= xxxx.xxx, Z= xxxx.xxx Number of discrepant holes: xxx, --- Hole #1 >>> S/B - Should Be Condition: >>> IS- Current Condition Nominal hole Diameter (in): xxxx/xxxx Diameter (in): xxxx/xxxx Nominal Fastener callout: xxxxxxxxxx Edge Margin (in): xxxx Nominal Fillet relief radius: xxxxxxxxxx Actual Fillet relief radius: xxxxxxxxxx >>> REFERENCE: --- Affected Parts: --- Part name, number, material, and thickness, --- *** See Attachment’s *** >>> QA contact: Name and Phone # Fastener Defects:



22

Fastener Flushness – [FF] >>> GENERAL: --- Fastener Flushness --- LOCATION: --- STA: xxxx --- STR: xxL --- X= xxxx.xxx, Y= xxxx.xxx, Z= xxxx.xxx Number of discrepant fasteners: xxx, --- >>> IS: --- Flush-head Fastener Callout common to Part name, number is above / below flushness as follows: --- Hole A = +/-.xxx , Hole B = +/-.xxx , etc. --- >>> S/B: --- The noted Flush-head fasteners should be flush to the surface to 0.000, and within +.xxx002 / -0.xxx005 of an inch per BAC xxxx-x. --- >>> REFERENCE: --- Affected Parts: --- Part name, number, material, and thickness, --- *** See Attachment’s *** >>> QA contact: Name and Phone #

Damaged Fastener – [DF] >>> GENERAL: --- Damaged Fastener(s) --- LOCATION: --- STA: xxxx --- STR: xxL --- X= xxxx.xxx, Y= xxxx.xxx, Z= xxxx.xxx Number of discrepant fasteners: xxx, --- >>> IS: --- Hole(s) is/are true and round to xxx/xxx (in) Diameter through the entire stack-up referenced below. --- Pitch Distance to the adjacent hole is xxx (in). --- Edge margin to the closest edge of the Part name is xxx (in). --- >>> S/B: --- Hole(s) should be xxx/xxx (in) Diameter for a Pin/Bolt and Collar/Nut per BAC xxxx-x. --- >>> REFERENCE: --- Affected Parts: --- Part name, number, material, and thickness, --- *** See Attachment’s *** >>> QA contact: Name and Phone # Fit Defects: Gaps – [GP]



23

>>> GENERAL: --- Excessive Gap --- LOCATION: --- STA: xxxx --- STR: xxL --- X= xxxx.xxx, Y= xxxx.xxx, Z= xxxx.xxx >>> IS: --- A tapered / constant Gap exists between Part name, number and Part name, number measuring .xxx to .xxx. ---The gap area between mating Parts measures .xxx by .xxx. >>> S/B: --- No gap between noted Parts exceeding a maximum gap of .xxx per ARM/IRM or Spec. Shim allowance up to .xxx per ARM/IRM or Spec is NOT allowed. --- >>> REFERENCE: --- Affected Parts: --- Part name, number, material, and thickness , --- *** See Attachment’s *** >>> QA contact: Name and Phone #

Interference / Riding Condition – [IN] >>> GENERAL: --- Interference --- LOCATION: --- STA: xxxx --- STR: xxL --- X= xxxx.xxx, Y= xxxx.xxx, Z= xxxx.xxx >>> IS: --- An interference condition exists between Part name, number and Part name, number. The interference area measures .xxx by .xxx. The interference nonconformance is due to: Explanation of riding condition. --- (Additional information for a fouling fastener might include) --- Pitch Distance to the adjacent hole is xxx (in). --- Edge margin to the closest edge of the Part name is xxx (in). --- >>> S/B: --- No interference between noted Parts with a minimum gap of .xxx per MBD or Spec. --- >>> REFERENCE: --- Affected Parts: --- Part name, number, material, and thickness, --- *** See Attachment’s *** >>> QA contact: Name and Phone # Damage Defects: Scratches / Scored – [PS]



24

>>> GENERAL: --- Scratch (es) --- LOCATION: --- STA: xxxx --- STR: xxL --- X= xxxx.xxx, Y= xxxx.xxx, Z= xxxx.xxx Number of scratches: xxx >>> IS: --- There exists the noted scratch(es) common to Part name, number, material. ---Scratch #1: Depth of scratch: xxxx (in.) , --- # of plies affected (if applicable): xxxx , --- Length of scratch: xxxx (in.) --- Width of scratch: xxxx (in.) --- Distance to closest hole: xxxx (in.) --- Distance to closest edge: xxx (in.) --- >>> S/B: --- No scratches or surface defects per BAC xxxx-x. --- >>> REFERENCE: --- Affected Parts: --- Part name, number, material, and thickness, --- *** See Attachment’s *** >>> QA contact: Name and Phone # NOTE: If a scratch/gouge, exists c/t CFRP material please perform a PRA disposition to NDI before submitting for engineering evaluation.

Bonding Defects: Delamination – [DO] >>> GENERAL: --- Delamination(s) --- LOCATION: --- STA: xxxx --- STR: xxL --- X= xxxx.xxx, Y= xxxx.xxx, Z= xxxx.xxx Number of affected areas: xxx, --- >>> IS: --- There is delamination to the inboard / outboard / aft / forward / upper / lower corner / edge / side of the Part name, number. Measurements of the Defect based on visual inspection are: Depth: xxxx , --- Length: xxxx , ---Width: xxxx , --- # of plies affected: xxxx , --- Distance to closest hole (if applicable): xxxx , --- Distance to closest edge (if applicable): xxxx --- *** Upon Completion of NDI per BAC 5980 ***>>> Measurements of the Defect based on NDI are: Depth: xxxx , --- Length: xxxx , ---Width: xxxx , --- # of plies affected: xxxx , --- >>> S/B: --- No delaminations per BAC xxxx-x. --- >>> REFERENCE: --- Affected Parts: --- Part name, number, material, and thickness, --- *** See Attachment’s *** >>> QA contact: Name and Phone #

sqr-003 rev m rev 1 - vought · nonconformance reference handbook for suppliers sqr-003 revision...

Documents