social security today: from the origins of social security to today’s structure; long-run problems...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
Social Security
Today: From the origins of Social Security to today’s structure; Long-run problems due to the graying of America
Today: Social Security
Some people rely on SS for a majority of their income
How many of you pay less than $500 for rent on an apartment?
Let’s see what $500 can rent in Memphis
6895 Club Ridge Cir.
6895 Club Ridge Cir.
Price checked May 2010
Studios from $445
Today
We analyze another benefit that most seniors receive Social Security (SS)
Questions How did Social Security begin? What is today’s structure? How is the graying of America affecting SS? How do we solve the long-run challenges to SS? How do people change their behavior with the
implementation of SS?
How did Social Security begin? SS, which is officially Old Age, Survivors, and
Disability Insurance, began in 1937 White male work categories initially were covered Coverage grew to more people over the next 50
years or so Justification for SS
What if I outlive my money? Indirectly transfers money from those that die young to
those that die old Directly, the transfer is from workers to retirees
Fully funded?
Original idea involved having a large fund to pay benefits out of
Political pressure turned SS into a pay-as-you-go system The current generation of workers pays for today’s
retirees There has been some money in reserve
Reserves projected to diminish starting in 2017
Fully Funded Plan
Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4
contribute benefits
contribute benefits
contribute benefits
The GreatestGeneration
The Baby BoomGeneration
Generation X
Work Retire Dead
Unborn
Work
Work
Retire
StillDead
DeadChildhood
Childhood Retire
Each generation’s benefits based on
deposits it made during working life plus
accumulated interest
Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4
The GreatestGeneration
The Baby BoomGeneration
Generation X
Work Retire Dead
Unborn
Work
Work
Retire
StillDead
DeadChildhood
Childhood Retire
contribute
benefits
contribute
benefits
contribute
benefits
benefits
Pay As You Go (or Unfunded) System
Each generation’s benefits come from tax
payments made by current workers
Projected revenues and payments of SS
In 2017, payments are projected to exceed tax revenue
Growth of SS in the US
Figure 11.1: Social Security expenditures (1937-2005)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1937 1942 1947 1952 1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002
Year
Rea
l Exp
end
itu
res
(200
5 $
Bill
ion
s)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Exp
end
itu
res
as %
of
GD
P
Real Expenditures (2006 $ Billions) Expenditures as % of GDP
How does SS work?
Mostly pay-as-you-go, or unfunded, financing Recall that some reserves exist
Financing Current workers pay, retirees receive
Retirement age “Normal” age is gradually increasing
Benefit structure Based on average indexed monthly earnings
Financing
In 2006, each of the first $94,200 was subject to SS taxes 12.4%, evenly split between employee and employer Note that Medicare financing is separate from SS
Taxes create illusion of obligation to future generations SS could be eliminated if the federal gov’t decided to do so
SS tax rates over time
The Social Security Trust Fund
Money flow shown above Workers pay into the trust fund Retirees receive money from the trust fund
Worker RetireeTrust Fund
Retirement ageYear of birth Full retirement age Months between age 62 and full
retirement age
1937 or earlier 65 36
1938 65 and 2 months 38
1939 65 and 4 months 40
1940 65 and 6 months 42
1941 65 and 8 months 44
1942 65 and 10 months 46
1943-1954 66 48
1955 66 and 2 months 50
1956 66 and 4 months 52
1957 66 and 6 months 54
1958 66 and 8 months 56
1959 66 and 10 months 58
1960 or later 67 60
62 is minimum retirement age (with reduction in benefits)
Benefit structure
Based off average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) Top 35 years of wages, factored for inflation
2006 benefit formula: Primary insurance amount (PIA) 90% of first $656 of AIME, plus 32% of AIME between $656 and $3,955 15% above $3,955 Cap on benefits based on maximum taxable
earnings subject to SS payroll tax
Benefit structure
0200400600800
100012001400160018002000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500
AIME
PIA
First Bend Point
Second Bend Point
Long-run problems with SS
Population growth in some countries is stagnating
Populations are getting older on average
Both problems are putting pressure to do at least one of the following Decrease benefits Increase the retirement
age Increase SS taxes
A simple model
Assume three equal periods of life Childhood Working years Retirement
Suppose that each generation is twice as big as the previous one Twice as many workers as retirees Workers pay less into SS than they receive when
they retire
Stagnation in population growth Population growth has stagnated in some
developed countries Example: Greece, 2007 estimates
Current population growth is 0.16% per year Childbearing is not keeping up with death rates
1.35 children born per woman’s childbearing years Only positive net migration is keeping Greece’s population
from falling
(Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Greece)
Greek population Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Greece
Year
Tho
usan
ds o
f pe
ople
Graying of the population
America is currently “graying” in two ways Americans are living longer
Life expectancy 1959-1961: 69.9 years 2004: 77.8 years
Infant mortality 1959-1961: 2.6% 2004: 0.68%
Baby boom generation has begun to retire
Statistics from Center for Disease Control and Prevention website
Graying of the population
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93 97
Age
Nu
mb
er o
f p
eop
le
Series1
Series2
This graph show the number of people aged 0-99 in 1999
Baby boom generation (roughly)
Some possible solutions to SS problem In order to have
sustainable solvency of the SS system in the US, additional financing equivalent to a 3.5 percentage point increase in the payroll tax must be achieved
Some other possible solutions Raise the maximum
taxable earnings level Raise the retirement age Reduce the cost-of-living
adjustment Change the benefit
formula A combination of options
Warning
Secondary effects must be taken into account with SS reform Be careful about increasing taxes
In Chapter 15, we will see that tax increases can cause other problems in the economy
Increasing the retirement age could increase the supply of workers Could lead to lower wages for all workers
What will happen to SS?
Over the next decade, one of several things could occur to SS Nothing: Let the next generation solve the
problem Waiting too long could lead to social unrest Politically, your age group is the “next generation”
Partly solve the problem Current solvency: 30-40 years Some proposals would increase this to 75 years
Fully solve the problem (not likely)
How do people change behavior with SS? With SS, people change their behavior in the
working years We will examine the life-cycle theory of
savings Wealth substitution effect Retirement effect Bequest effect
Life cycle theory of savings
People save and borrow based on planned lifetime consumption
Somebody with diminishing MU prefers smooth consumption over time Without SS, a rational person will save during the
working years and use this money for retirement
Budget constraint for present and future consumption
Present consumption (c0)
Fut
ure
cons
umpt
ion
(c1)
N
M
I0
I1
D
I0 - S
I1 + (1+r) S
S
(1+r)S
I1 - (1+r) BF
B
(1+r)B
At endowment point consumer
neither saves nor borrows
Wealth substitution effect
Along the budget constraint, suppose I am forced to have $1 less today and $(1 + r) more in future consumption
This will lead to $1 less in saving today Crowds out private saving Known as the wealth substitution effect
Utility-maximizing choice of present and future consumption
Present consumption (c0)
Fut
ure
cons
umpt
ion
(c1)
N
M
I0
I1
E1c1*
A
c0*
Saving
Crowding out of private saving due to SS
Present consumption (c0)
Fut
ure
cons
umpt
ion
(c1)
N
M
I0
I1
E1c1*
A
c0*
R
T
I0T
(1+r)T
Saving before Social Security
Saving after Social
Security
Retirement effect
SS gives workers a financial incentive to retire early Retirement effect states that people may save
more in their working years in order to have their desired consumption during a longer retirement period
Bequest effect
Some people may feel guilty with the fact that their children are financing their retirement Bequest effect states that people save more
during their working years to finance a larger bequest to their children when they die
Summary
SS is a big part of the US economy About 4.25% of GDP Private saving likely changes when SS is
introduced An idea of fully-funded SS system turned into
a pay-as-you-go system Reforms will need to be made in order to
make SS solvent for your retirement
Next lecture: Parts of Chapters 12 and 13 Distribution of income (I
will present this differently than the textbook)
Rationales for redistribution
In-kind versus cash transfers
Various welfare programs for the poor TANF EITC Supplemental Security
Income Medicaid Unemployment insurance
Problems
Contributions to Social Security Crowding out of private saving
Problem 1
Contributing to Social Security Assume 2006 structure
Earnings taxed up to $94,200 12.4% tax rate, split evenly between employee and
employer How much is paid by employee if earnings are…
$40,000? $80,000? $120,000? $160,000?
Problem 1
Explicitly, the employee only pays half of the tax 6.2%
6.2% of $40,000 is $2,480 6.2% of $80,000 is $4,960 For the last two incomes listed on the
previous page, the employee “maxes out” 6.2% of $94,200 is $5,840.40
Problem 2
Crowding out private saving Assume two periods
Working years (period 1) Retirement years (period 2) Real interest rate of 20% between two periods
Earnings of $1,000,000 in period 1, $0 in period 2 Utility is product of consumption in each period
Problem 2
What will consumption be in each period without social security?
What happens if the government provides the following social security system? $200,000 in SS taxes in period 1 $240,000 in SS payments in period 2
Problem 2: Case 1
No social security Utility is c1c2
Constraint (1 + 0.2) c1 + c2 = $1,200,000
Equivalent to $1,000,000 consumed in period 1, $1,200,000 consumed in period 2, or a linear combination
Same as c2 = $1,200,000 – 1.2c1
Solution max c1c2 s.t. c2 = $1,200,000 – 1.2c1
Equivalent to max c1 (1,200,000 – 1.2c1)
Problem 2: Case 1
Solve max 1,200,000c1 – 1.2c12
Set FOC equal to zero 1,200,000 – 2.4c1 = 0
c1 = 500,000
The rest of consumption goes to period 2 Save $500,000 of earnings in period 1 Add 20% interest (100,000)
$600,000 consumption in period 2
Problem 2: Case 2
What happens with SS system $200,000 of saving gets diverted to SS system Implicit 20% return when retired
Same outcome as in Case 1, except $300,000 is saved instead of $500,000
Seniors in protest?
Dear Senator,I have voted for you for the last 30 years. Now that I’m
retired, you’d better not #@$*&! lower my cost-of-
living adjustment.Have a nice day,Mr. Not Working
What’s next? Attacking politicians with walkers and canes?